Slashdot Mirror
Tickbox Must Remove Pirate Streaming Add-ons From Sold Devices (torrentfreak.com)
TickBox TV, the company behind a Kodi-powered streaming device, must release a new software updater that will remove copyright-infringing addons from previously shipped devices. A California federal court issued an updated injunction in the lawsuit that was filed by several major Hollywood studios, Amazon, and Netflix, which will stay in place while both parties fight out their legal battle. TorrentFreak reports: Last year, the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment (ACE), an anti-piracy partnership between Hollywood studios, Netflix, Amazon, and more than two dozen other companies, filed a lawsuit against the Georgia-based company Tickbox TV, which sells Kodi-powered set-top boxes that stream a variety of popular media. ACE sees these devices as nothing more than pirate tools so the coalition asked the court for an injunction to prevent Tickbox from facilitating copyright infringement, demanding that it removes all pirate add-ons from previously sold devices. Last month, a California federal court issued an initial injunction, ordering Tickbox to keep pirate addons out of its box and halt all piracy-inducing advertisements going forward. In addition, the court directed both parties to come up with a proper solution for devices that were already sold.
The new injunction prevents Tickbox from linking to any "build," "theme," "app," or "addon" that can be indirectly used to transmit copyright-infringing material. Web browsers such as Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Safari, and Firefox are specifically excluded. In addition, Tickbox must also release a new software updater that will remove any infringing software from previously sold devices. All tiles that link to copyright-infringing software from the box's home screen also have to be stripped. Going forward, only tiles to the Google Play Store or to Kodi within the Google Play Store are allowed. In addition, the agreement also allows ACE to report newly discovered infringing apps or addons to Tickbox, which the company will then have to remove within 24-hours, weekends excluded.
The new injunction prevents Tickbox from linking to any "build," "theme," "app," or "addon" that can be indirectly used to transmit copyright-infringing material. Web browsers such as Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Safari, and Firefox are specifically excluded. In addition, Tickbox must also release a new software updater that will remove any infringing software from previously sold devices. All tiles that link to copyright-infringing software from the box's home screen also have to be stripped. Going forward, only tiles to the Google Play Store or to Kodi within the Google Play Store are allowed. In addition, the agreement also allows ACE to report newly discovered infringing apps or addons to Tickbox, which the company will then have to remove within 24-hours, weekends excluded.
Fair enough.
I wonder how many people will just reinstall the removed addons? I'm sure there is somebody already writing up a how-to just for this court ruling.
First, this is incredibly draconian and a significant escalation of anti-piracy abuses. However, Kodi is GPL software, and would require modification to block some add-ons. The question is, will they release the modified source that blocks some types of add-ons?
Blatant 1st Amendment violation!
Please, let's just make the bittorrent protocol or something similar blend in better with regular traffic, so it's harder to block. We have to work around this one way or another.
Just disconnect your box from the internet and you will not receive the updates.
This people actually easy piracy as a feature of the device and included add-ons that are directly connected to websites with nothing but pirated videos.
I'm surprised they are allowed to just remove the add-ons given that they actually did the legal damage to themselves.
is it *ALL* "infringing" software, or only what the products shipped with new (i.e. excludes user-installed addons, regardless of purpose)..... if it includes the latter, that opens the door for microsoft, google, apple, etc. to soon one day be forced to do the same to their desktop and mobile operating systems.
microsoft can't go app store only with anti trust issues and banning Linux is a big no go
So bloodsuckers then?
antitrust issues and region locking issues + maybe even ISP issues. Say comcrap says no you can't have HBO GO you must use the Comcast app with an full video sub (min level locals or higher as we don't think the 1992 laws cover IP video) + Add on HBO.
NOT PRO KKK OR NAZI. BUT PRO 1ST Amendment
make an kkk vs nazi app and then go to court to fight for your 1st Amendment rights.
Skokie, Illinois tried to ban nazis and lost in court.
NOT PRO KKK OR NAZI. BUT PRO 1ST Amendment
Almost humiliating to be an American.
Just paint that graffiti over that will fix the graffiti problem in all cities.
Sorry, that's not how court orders work.
Here is a documentary about Hollywood's (portrayed as space aliens) conquest to destroy all pirates (portrayed as women).
I think Sony would like to comment about what happens when you issue an update that removes functionality from an already sold device......
Removing user installed software shouldn't be allowed by a court order. Sure, ban the company from distributing or promoting it, but forcibly uninstalling it via a system update, is a violation of the user's rights unless they themselves are convicted in court, and can lead to some really dark waters very quickly.
("Oh, that irresponsible encryption software has to go, as does that compiler that you built it with.....")
and other Mass Killers. This will soon die down - a week at the most - and we will return normalcy. We will move our lips during this time to calm the tree huggers but rest assured, YOUR GUNS ARE SAFE!
Yours,
The Inmates Running Congress, The White House, and The Supreme Court
The real question is how much money they're being paid
That is the question for sure! But it doesn't really matter how much. What matters is that they are in fact being paid by the open infringers. So they get this smackdown and have to play nice now, under supervision.
The lesson is: Plausible deniability has to be plausible. Without it, you get an injunction.
And that foolish person is why you put your own servers in to data centers and plug into the internet. You don't have to pay the microsoft tax. It is a long term issue. If you are in business the long view is good. Deciding on the platform is one of the first tasks in the job. The platform is computer, OS, update schedule, webkit you want to use and can support your business. VMs are useful for testing your updates and not much else. They are C++, Ruby and Java are right up there with VMs. Javascript, not so bad but an outgrowth of a two decades ago. Hard coding languages like 'C' prevents errors and bugs. Coding is not as fast to do but is safer. In a world where tens of millions of private records are being stolen off easy to do servers? When will people get it. Stack overflow is the single biggest bug and C can be made very tight against that.
Buzz words to bedazzle the weak minded managers. Don't get me started on Oracle. Java was designed to operate vending machines.
Their website used to say this on the front page
Question:
What TV shows and movies can I see for free?
Answer:
You can see almost every movie and TV series ever made. You can even access movies and shows that are still on Demand and episodes of TV that were just aired. You will never pay to watch any of them.
Enjoy watching complete seasons of almost every television series ever created, including those from the premium cable movie channels and subscription services.
Relax with some popcorn and catch the latest hollywood blockbuster from the comfort of your own home without paying a rental fee. Also included - Sidetick.TV!
Live stream over 50,000 live radio stations or access full albums from your favorite recording artist... finally cancel your spotify or satellite radio subscription saving hundred of dollars a year!
Watch upcoming PPV Events like UFC, Boxing, and Wrestlemania in ultra high definition without paying a single penny!
https://web.archive.org/web/20...
e.g. folks who own property. So they're going to tend to side with property owners, and that includes Intellectual Property owners. The ruling seems punitive and too broad. VLC could fall under this ruling. This reads like the plantif got everything they wanted while the defendant got nothing. Also, they seem to have picked a small target who couldn't fight back. They did not, for example, go after Roku. Even though it's not terribly difficult to get stuff like Popcorn time running on it.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
District Court judges are so amusingly ignorant of the law in the USA.
Skokie seems somewhat dampened by the fact the ACLU now believes social justice supersedes constitutional rights.
So,... the courts have found some way to modify the fabric of reality such that their collective will is directly implemented by said reality ?
OR
there's a degree of hyperbole involved?
Captcha: Helpless
I've long speculated whether the whole point of slashdot is to train a captch-generator!
To be fair, the other levels are no better, have you seen some of the rulings by the supreme court? Apparently they don't even know that the US has a constitution, let alone what it contains.
The text of the injunction
https://www.scribd.com/documen...
is an interested read, including multiple screen captures and the discussion that follows is fascinating, alleging that they may be responsible for copyright violation
"In Fung, the Ninth Circuit analyzed Grokster and held that a defendant may be held liable for copyright infringement under Grokster ’s inducement theory where four elements are present: “(1) the distribution of a device or product [by the defendant], (2) acts of infringement [by third parties], (3) an object [of the defendant] of promoting [the device’s or product’s] use to infringe copyright, and (4) causation. Fung , 710 F.3d at 1032"
The #3 above may get them in.
4wdloop
So I take it this means that they're stopping the gratuitous sequels, reboots, and cookie-cutter blockbusters, right? ;)
(I suppose I'd also accept it if they agreed to let us pirate works that are not Creative and Entertaining...)
If a judge or court says "remove these software titles from all Windows computers", anti-trust issues won't matter... or worse, "remove these files, identified by fingerprint, hash, samples and/or any future technology to do so, from all Windows computers and prohibit the transfer, copy or distribution of them in perpetuity."
Skokie seems somewhat dampened by the fact the ACLU now believes social justice supersedes constitutional rights.
In what way? Some aspects of social justice follow from the right to "equal protection" pursuant to the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Illinois Nazis?
I hate Illinois Nazis!
These fools are out of their mind, I had no idea these Kodi boxes were such a big deal. I guess I'm going to have to break out mine just to piss them off.
My second thought, just after "WTF is Kodi", was "Streisand effect".
How is this any different from streaming from the web through my notebook to my Chromecast? This ruling to me seems absurd.
What I don't really understand is how one court ruling is not binding elsewhere when another Judge makes a totally different ruling. Or here in the UK where Judges block access to certain sites at the behest of media companies but this is does not become an actual UK law as only certain ISP are listed (top 6), the small ISP can ignore these court order as they are not law, but one individual has been prosecuted to offering a way around the top 6 blocks even though no actual UK law has been broken.
I hope they do not have a webbrowser that would link to a google search where you cab type in filetype:torrent because that would be bad.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)[1] was enacted by Congress in 1986 as an amendment to existing computer fraud law (18 U.S.C. 1030), which had been included in the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984. The law prohibits accessing a computer without authorization, or in excess of authorization.
What's worse, "pirating" movies, or BREAKING INTO PEOPLES' COMPUTERS?
That judge was an unAmerican slimeball moron. I hope that he goes to jail for promoting and being an accomplice to Federal Crimes.
If the works are so devoid of value, why waste time and effort pirating them?
So in other words the internet. By connecting to the internet or having a web browser you are violating copy right laws. So how is this any different from any other type of device out there. When I buy a computer from dell or HP ect. How are they not violating copy right. Same with web browser that let me go to sites like Pirate Bay and others. Information should be free. If you don't want to have people take it for free then don't put it out there.
sure write the patch , make it availlable , nobody will download it or install it , 10$ a patch to the patch will come from the community to reinstate these contents , theres a judge that doesnt understand open source
Negative reinforcement.