Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Kills Its Mac App (betanews.com)

BrianFagioli writes: Twitter has announced that it is killing its Mac app. Without warning, the company pulled the app from the Mac App Store and issued the following tweet. "We're focusing our efforts on a great Twitter experience that's consistent across platforms. So, starting today the Twitter for Mac app will no longer be available for download, and in 30 days will no longer be supported.

52 comments

  1. New unified App by MikeDataLink · · Score: 2

    That's because they are working on a new unified app for Apple's new iOS on the Mac plan.... No need to continue to develop a dead end road.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    1. Re:New unified App by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you normally keep a version available and maintained until the new one is ready? How am I supposed to tweet from my Mac? A web browser?

    2. Re:New unified App by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      But why do you need an app for tweets? It's enough with a good web browser.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:New unified App by tepples · · Score: 2

      How am I supposed to tweet from my Mac? A web browser?

      Yes. What problems have you run into when accessing https://twitter.com/ from your web browser?

      (And if any, were they related to Safari's habit of lagging behind Firefox and Chrome in supporting new features of CSS, JavaScript, and DOM?)

    4. Re:New unified App by cstacy · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you like the app you have, you can keep it.

      Twitter is repealing and replacing their current app, and won't get rid of the existing one until the new one is available. It will be essentially simultaneous. And it will be MUCH better than the current app. MUCH. Also, Facebook will pay for it!

    5. Re:New unified App by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Is that like if I like my existing healthcare I get to keep it? You hurt my feelings snowflake!

    6. Re:New unified App by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      It is a joke. I didn't even know there was a Twitter app. Who needs an app to a website?

    7. Re:New unified App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like the app you have, you can keep it. Seriously, you're a moron.

      RTFA. Twitter's official client WILL stop working in a months time .They're revoking the access key after that, so the app will be as much use a fucking chocolate teapot.

      Who's the moron now, Mr. Moron McMoronFace ?

    8. Re:New unified App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How am I supposed to tweet from my Mac? A web browser?

      I guess if you don't use open source software you're at the mercy of the publisher of proprietary software.

    9. Re:New unified App by _xeno_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The best part of the Twitter app on Mac was that it's so out of date, they never bothered implementing ads - I'm sorry, "promoted tweets" - on it. That would be one reason to use it: built-in ad blocking.

      But other than that - yeah, I don't see a point to a Twitter app. If you want an "app-like experience" just grab a Twitter tab and throw it into its own little window. Boom. Twitter app.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    10. Re:New unified App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because users are now to dumb to launch a browser or type www.whereeverthefuckyouwanttogo.com

    11. Re:New unified App by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, Windows is a dead end road too...

    12. Re:New unified App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tweetdeck?

    13. Re:New unified App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notifications. Integration with sharing panels in other apps.

    14. Re:New unified App by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I have too many tabs open in my browser, so having a separate app makes a lot more sense. Speaking in general of all websites that have apps - be it Yelp!, Fandango, Best Buy, et al, not just Twitter or FaceBook

    15. Re:New unified App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want Mexico to pay for it!

  2. Losing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "We're focusing our efforts on a great Twitter experience" by losing 1000's of users

  3. Free Love. by geekmux · · Score: 2

    "But wait, I use that."

    "Hey, you can't do that!"

    "What the hell?! Why?!?"

    Ah, can't you just feel the Free Love? Ain't zero-cost apps awesome?

    BRB, gonna go log into Netflix now...see if they removed my favorite movies and shows again...gotta keep this buzz going.

    1. Re:Free Love. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You don't own anything on your devices. You just rent it from the tech companies. Welcome to 2018.

    2. Re:Free Love. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      You don't own anything on your devices. You just rent it from the tech companies. Welcome to 2018.

      Yup. And here's a little preview of where this is headed:

      You don't own anything. You just rent it. Welcome to 2038.

    3. Re:Free Love. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with Apple you don't even own the hardware.

  4. adverts... by johnjones · · Score: 1

    honestly its all about the advertisers... Is anyone who advertises on twitter objecting to this ?
    (so twitter will publish a website and mobile app's)

    This would be interesting if they link to data showing desktop vs mobile vs Web usage.

    regards

    John Jones

  5. What's the deal? by nine-times · · Score: 1

    Is this guy a paid shill or just a moron? To paraphrase:

    Hello fellow Mac users! I too use a Mac, just like you. Twitter is pulling support for their app, and though that may upset you, Twitter says that using the website is better. And boy are they right! The web experience is great on any platform! You should be using it right now, instead of that stupid app.

    I know, some other Mac users are going to say that they like native apps, but they're wrong. They don't like native apps. If you really want native apps, you can buy one of these native apps! But please don't like native apps. The correct way to use Twitter is through the website. And that's great, because you can get a better Twitter experience on a cheap Chromebook instead of an expensive stupid Mac. I mean... I like Macs, just like you, fellow Mac user.

    Tell me your thoughts in the comments below!

    1. Re:What's the deal? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Tell me your thoughts in the comments below!

      Tweets are for twits.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:What's the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was awesome. I was totally falling for it until the punchline. Perfect parody.

    3. Re:What's the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this guy a paid shill or just a moron?

      Not a real Twitter user. Character length exceeds 140.

  6. The Mac is dead. by sootman · · Score: 1

    Twitter confirms it.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:The Mac is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter is dead.
      The mac confirms it.

    2. Re:The Mac is dead. by HiThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gee...I'll have to think about switching to using a Mac. All the Twitter folks are going away.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  7. This is very disturbing news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess my only option is to continue not giving a shit about Twitter. Wake me up when they inevitably go out of business.

  8. Trump by Teun · · Score: 0

    One hell of a way to discourage this guy Trump.
    :)

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  9. It was dead long ago by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The Twitter Mac app was dead a long time ago, they just kept the corpse twitching to torture users...

    It never worked right for animated images, and never even got an update that let you use the new higher tweet character limit - presumably because the entire app would have had to be re-written from the ground up.

    Luckily there are a few third party Mac apps that fall under the grandfathered "unlimited oAuth tokens" for Twitter API use, so any number of customers can use them... Twitter may just be giving up the pretense they can handle Mac development.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  10. API key revocation by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you like the app you have, you can keep it.

    That doesn't work once Twitter revokes the API key used by said app.

    1. Re:API key revocation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like the app you have, you can keep it.

      That doesn't work once Twitter revokes the API key used by said app.

      But you gotta agree to the terms of service before you can know what's in it.

  11. Mac App? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I never knew they had a Mac app. I've been using FIrefox for Twitter access. I can't see any reason to have an app when the browser does everything I need. I had to take the twitter app off my Android phone because it basically wanted to take over my phone. Damn sure I don't want anything like that on my Mac. Hell no.

  12. Why should any company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maintain an app for a dead platform?

  13. Shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That it is Twitter itself that isn't dying (filing for Chapter 7)
    They are just purveyors of crap and lies.
    In a few decades we will look back and wonder why we were so stupid.

  14. I'm Sure They Are Working on a Hybrid App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect the Mac app was native (probably Objective-C).

    I'll bet their new app will be React Native or Xamarin.

    That's what I would recommend to them. Their service is pretty much the platonic ideal for a hybrid app.

  15. Anti-script hardliners; outdated browsers by tepples · · Score: 2

    Who needs an app to a website?

    Mostly three people:

    • Anti-script hardliners who don't want web pages to be interactive at all beyond link navigation and form submission because they believe a web browser ought to be a viewer for static documents, not an application platform. They prefer native applications that they can vet before installation.
    • Free software purists who refuse to run proprietary script, as described in the article "The JavaScript Trap" by Richard M. Stallman. They prefer to use or write a free native application that talks to the same web service that the site's proprietary script talks to.
    • People stuck on a browser with incomplete support for recent web standards, such as users of Safari for iOS or Edge for Windows 10 S.
  16. Oh yeah, they DID have a Mac app .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Shows how much the thing meant to me.... As far as I'm concerned, Twitter is based on such a simple premise, it's the last thing I want to install a whole application to do. It's bad enough I keep getting spam emails from them to "remind me" about other content people tweeted that I might want to sign in and read.

  17. Re:Breaking:UTF8 symbol crashes all Apple devices by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Because it was on slashdot the other day, you fucking moron. There needs to be at least one week before we get dupes.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  18. Biggest problem: Account switching by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Yes. What problems have you run into when accessing https://twitter.com/ from your web browser?

    All of the Twitter clients I have used have pretty good support for multiple Twitter logins. The website has zero such support (unless I've missed something? Would be happy to be proven wrong here).

    Like many people I know, I have a professional and a personal Twitter account. I'd prefer to be able to see both feeds interleaved, and to be able to easily post to either account. On the web site you have to log out and log back in, which really sucks compared to clients.

    The Mac does have other standalone clients though, so it's not like Mac users are losing anything. If anything they are better off being forced to migrate to vastly better third party apps (the official Mac Twitter app is absolutely terrible).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Biggest problem: Account switching by swell · · Score: 1

      "On the web site you have to log out and log back in, which really sucks compared to clients."

      Sounds like a great safety feature. It seems that many people impulsively post things that they later regret. A built-in time delay could prevent many of those incidents, possibly even protecting the reputation of a World Leader.

      --
      ...omphaloskepsis often...
  19. Multi-Account Containers in Firefox by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    All of the Twitter clients I have used have pretty good support for multiple Twitter logins. The website has zero such support (unless I've missed something? Would be happy to be proven wrong here).

    If you use Multi-Account Containers, a feature of Mozilla Firefox, any website supports multiple logins. Create a container for accounts related to your brand and another for personal use, and Firefox will track your Twitter cookies separately for tabs belonging to each container. It's not interleaving, but it does let you switch between the two more easily.

    Does Safari support anything similar?

    1. Re:Multi-Account Containers in Firefox by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Not really other than private browsing - But that would work in a similar way since you could have two tabs open. with different accounts.

      I don't really like that option though, not only is there the having to switch tabs to read different streams but also one reason for having them in the same client is being able to easily share content from one account via the other instead (basically retweeting under a different account). If you start talking custom browser features you may as well just have a native client, even if a poor one...

      I always thought it was pretty interesting that Twitter never added that ability to the website because like I said, every native client has that feature (including Twitter's own native client).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  20. Re:Breaking:UTF8 symbol crashes all Apple devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a UTF-8 issue. It's Unicode combining characters again, just like Apple had problems with a couple of years ago.

  21. Hey, it's Twitter by HanzoSpam · · Score: 1

    They probably decided Apple were Russians or Nazis or racists or something, and banned them from Twitter in a huff. They get that way sometimes.

    --

    Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
  22. It'd only make sense... by sentiblue · · Score: 1

    Why would you need that app on a computer when the website accessible via any browser is a fully functional option?

  23. What about the OS integration? by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Doesn't MacOS depend on the twitter app in order to do it's twitter integration?

    I could be wrong. I've always thought providing direct OS support for ephimeral services was silly, so I've always ignored that functionality anyway.

    But for all the people that actually do care about this functionality, won't they get screwed over by this?