Slashdot Mirror


Venezuela Says Its Cryptocurrency Raised $735 Million -- But It's a Farce (arstechnica.com)

Earlier this week, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro claimed that a new state-sponsored cryptocurrency called the petro raised $735 million on the first day of its sale. ArsTechnica dives deep on the matter to suggest that it's all a farce. From the report: The government hasn't provided any way to independently verify that $735 million figure. And there's reason to doubt almost everything the Venezuelan government has said about the project. Moreover, there's little reason to believe that the petro will maintain its value over time. The Venezuelan government has portrayed petro tokens as backed by Venezuela's vast oil reserves, but they're not. The government is merely promising to accept tax payments in petros at a government-determined exchange rate linked to oil prices. Given the Venezuelan government's history of manipulating exchange rates, experts say investors should be wary of this arrangement. Moreover, the petro scheme has been opposed by opposition legislators in Venezuela's opposition-controlled legislature. They say that the Maduro government is essentially issuing oil-backed debt, and legally that can't be done without approval from the legislature. If Maduro falls from power in the future, his successor might refuse to honor petro redemptions.

89 comments

  1. It's a Farce? by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Didn't I say that YESTERDAY when we discussed this new crypto currency?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:It's a Farce? by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 3

      Doesn't that really apply to pretty much any crypto currency though?

    2. Re:It's a Farce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good for you.

    3. Re:It's a Farce? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It is not a new crypto currency, that is a lie, it is an energy backed crypto currency and that is a world apart from empty marketing backed crypto currencies, no comparison. The reason of course it fails, is no business method for an international exchange offering a range of crypto currencies with independent mechanism for monitoring and ensuring the energy backing does in fact exist, can be supplied and will be honoured. No international and national exchange business method and no effective energy backed crypto currency, do it your self will fail, not as bad as marketing backed cryto, nothing is quite that bad, you dumb fuckers might as well be trading in bubblegum cards or magic scamming the children with gambling cards gathering (there is a reason they don't want judges to be checked, management and owners have problems).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:It's a Farce? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Pretty much so. Crypto-currencies are built basically on 100% hot air. Well in actual reality they are built on vacuum.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re: It's a Farce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go and do some research. Each crypto has a purpose. Some have promise. Some don't. Assuming everyone investing in these are dumb or just trading Pokemon cards is lazy. There are over 1000+ of them and some will change the world. Some will replace Nasdaq. I know you will probably read this and remain ignorant.

  2. And so, it has come to this by neilo_1701D · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Announce new cryptocurrency
    2. Get "investors"
    3. ???
    4. Profit!
    5. Flee country

    1. Re:And so, it has come to this by pastafazou · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's no mystery step required in your list. Remove 3, and switch the order of 4 and 5.

    2. Re:And so, it has come to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Step 3 is "Blockchain, Blockchain, BLOCKCHAIN!!!"

    3. Re:And so, it has come to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lambos and moons! HODL!

    4. Re:And so, it has come to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Venezuela, "country" profits by fleeing from investors...

    5. Re:And so, it has come to this by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      1. Announce new cryptocurrency
      2. Get "investors"
      3. "WE GOT HACKED!"
      4. Flee country
      5. Profit!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:And so, it has come to this by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      You can revise step 5 when you ARE the country.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  3. What a bummer! by ls671 · · Score: 3

    I should have read your yesterday comment. I bought 734,999,995$ worth of petros, flew to Venezuela and now I am here to collect my oil :(

    What a bummer!

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  4. There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

    government.

    The summary says there is reason to doubt what the Venezuelan government has said about the 'petro". Well, of course there is. There is reason to doubt anything said by the Venezuelan government.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  5. do you want americans to liberate your country? by nimbius · · Score: 1, Insightful

    because trading oil on a market other than the US Dollar is an excellent way to experience sudden and unexpected violently American Freedom(c) and Democracy(c) in your country. https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We don't want Venezuelan oil. It's dirty and high in sulfur and not compatible with our refineries.

      The only refineries in the world that can handle Venezuelan oil are in Venezuela ... and they're all a bit out of order at the moment. Talk about strangling your golden goose.

    2. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by stabiesoft · · Score: 2, Informative

      And I don't think it had anything to do with Iran. At the time, Bush/Cheney hated Saddam. We had the WTC attack by the Saudi's/Afghans and Cheney morphed it into Saddam's fault. Then there was the whole charade of WMD that Iraq did not have. It was all about getting Saddam. That turned out quite badly and spawned ISIS as a real power.

    3. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by saider · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that Saddam tried to assassinate Bush Sr. Bush Jr. was responding to that.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    4. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by quicks0rt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oil was not the sole reason, but a largest contributer. To say otherwise is to turn a blind eye on motivations behind military-industrial complex.

      https://www.cnn.com/2013/03/19...
      https://www.theguardian.com/en...
      http://www.washingtonsblog.com...

      By your logic since Iraq was next door to Iran for invading Iraq, we should invade Kazakhstan(or any neighboring state) and China to engage future warfare with Russia and North Korea, respectively? Why not invade Iran directly instead of surrounding it? Also, since Pakistan is also a border state, what's your excuse for leaving that one behind? You know, the one that provided harbor for Bin Laden?

      And guess who's the biggest sponsor of terrorism now - Saudi Arabia - but we are allies with them?
      https://www.huffingtonpost.com...
      https://www.newsbud.com/2017/0...
      https://www.salon.com/2016/01/...
      http://www.newsweek.com/why-sa...

      You see, we see it as what it is. A complete bullshit by neocons running the White House.

    5. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by Stomper_Stoddard · · Score: 1

      if everything else was exactly the same, except instead of oil, Iraq was one of the largest exporters of grape jelly in the world, would we have still invaded?

    6. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Saddam was happy to sell us cheap oil as long as he got to stay in power. Going to war destabilized that and lowered the supply, raising prices. Also, we didn't keep any oil once we took over. We put Iraqis back in charge of it right away. So we didn't get free oil or cheap oil out of it. That's obvious to everybody but a self-important Liberal who has been fed propaganda his entire life and thinks he's smarter than everyone else.

    7. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Iran, the world's largest sponsor of Islamic terrorism

      [citation-needed]

      Is that the Sunni/Israeli worldview where the world's evils are perpetrated by a minority Shia sect? I myself don't know the facts but am wary of partisan propaganda.

      Wouldn't you just invade Iran then? Dubya mumbled something about Saddam's imagined WMD at the time, while Iran was allegedly building actual nukes.

    8. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of the refineries that can handle that oil/sludge are in USA. Thus Venezuela's problem exporting the oil to anyone else.

    9. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Technically the second Iraq war occurred because Saddam violated every provision in the surrender agreement they signed to end the first Iraq war. Factor in numerous countries who used the UN to circumvent the oil for food program and the second Iraq war was on solid legal ground. People fixate on the WMD claims and totally ignore Iraq's blatant violation of the surrender terms laid out to end the first Iraq war. Surrender terms that were signed off on by all the countries that participated in the first war. At the end of the first Iraq war US should have kept going north to Baghdad blowing up and killing anything showing the slightest bit of resistance. If you are going to go to all the trouble and expense of creating the most powerful military on the planet you should use it to it's full effect. The US has been fighting with one hand tied behind their backs since the Korean war.

    10. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Iraqi oil was already flowing on the world market [...]

      Yes, but they were selling it for euros--not dollars--and that is unacceptable!

    11. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The Venezuelans I've met a) would like the US to liberate their country and b) and very pissed off it shows no sign of doing it.

      That's of course not a reason for the US to do this. The US needs to do things because they're in its interests, not out of charity to a bunch of non citizens.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re:do you want americans to liberate your country? by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      That turned out quite badly and spawned ISIS as a real power

      ISIS spawned because of the power vacuum left behind thanks to the previous administration, and the stupid Iraq government's refusal to come to an agreement on status of forces.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  6. Still government backed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still backed by the same government. Do you trust them any more now than you did when they were using the old currency?

  7. analysts by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    "there's little reason to believe that the petro will maintain its value over time"
    ...and given the evidence we get from other cryptocurrencies and analysts, there are many reasons to believe the opposite.

  8. Doesn't matter by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Even if they raised $7.35B with a capital B, it would be wasted and transferred out of the country by the corrupt People's Cadre running the country.

    In related news, the ANC has announced that they plan to seize white-owned land in South Africa, but they'll be smart this time and won't "hurt the economy." (This puts us on the right into the awkward position of pointing out that Mugabe is corrupt, not stupid. He didn't intentionally set out to burn his agriculture sector to the ground. It's just a byproduct of taking fertile land from farmers and giving it to patsies.)

    So in the future, we keep adding third world countries to the list of victims of "poverty that just happens" like it's some sort of Act of God/Satan(tm) instead of the, by now, highly predictable consequences of adopting radical wealth transfer policies that don't even attempt to say "hey, make sure you transfer the money to the workers who actually know what the fuck to do with it instead of the ones who'll buy more beer, pot and a TV."

    1. Re:Doesn't matter by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      the ANC has announced that they plan to seize white-owned land in South Africa, but they'll be smart this time and won't "hurt the economy." This puts us on the right into the awkward position of pointing out that Mugabe is corrupt, not stupid.

      He's certainly smart enough to know what country he's president of.

      Or rather, was president of.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Doesn't matter by chill · · Score: 2

      Rhodesia, right?

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1

    4. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP might not have been clear, but they're trying to draw a parallel to what Mugabe did in his country back in the early aughts. They're saying (I think) that maybe Mugabe had the right idea after all, since the ANC is now doing the same thing to validate his decision. They're just going to 'do it better', since Mugabes handling of the land seizure pretty much destroyed Zimbabwe.

    5. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      South Africa will be another famine plagued shithole inside of 10 years.

  9. If it's real lets see the results by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I say, let them claim they raised any amount they like. 10 billion? Fine by me.

    Then of course, the question is what happens with all the money supposedly raised? Will Venezuelans start getting food and toilet paper in stores? Will government workers start getting paid regularly again? Will they have functioning hospitals once more?

    No? Well then, what happened to all that money...

    The more they claim the more guilty they look later when it's gone.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:If it's real lets see the results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This. What happens with the money? Will we actually see Venezuelans not having to eat their pets, or will there be more Rolls Royces for the party in charge?

  10. Opposition Controlled?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Moreover, the petro scheme has been opposed by opposition legislators in Venezuela's opposition-controlled legislature.

    Maduro's party is IN CONTROL of the legislature (and the courts). That's like saying Pelosi opposed Obama.

    1. Re:Opposition Controlled?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are two elected bodies. One that has existed for a long time and is run by maduro opponents after an election blow out a few years ago.. When that happened maduro created a new legistlature and had his supporters elected to it. Both these bodies claim to be the true representatives

  11. welcome to cryptocurrency HELL by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is now required that somebody start selling a cryptocurrency called the vuvuzela in order to catch on with brand confusion. If you buy 1 $vvz, that prevents one of the people we will employ as vuvuzela blowers from visiting you at your house. The more $vvz we sell, the more employment as vuvuzela blowers, so this currency actually promotes employment. Obviously we have a built in market cap of ~7.9 billion, with some room for growth.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  12. I am SHOCKED! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Are you saying a fake currency with no value backed by non-existent resources is a farce?

    Next thing, you'll tell me my South Sea shares are worthless and my tulip futures are at best 1 peso a bulb!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I am SHOCKED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you name a currency, any currency other than barter that isn't a fake farce and backed by nothing?

  13. Which is worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To have an unbacked cryptocurrency like Bitcoin?

    Or a dubiously backed cryptocurrency like Petro?

    1. Re:Which is worse? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin is backed by hopes and dreams and hype.

      This is a significant improvement over being backed by Venezuela.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  14. Waking up to the realities of socialism, kiddies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are we now waking up to the realities of socialism, kiddies?

    Wages in the US are now going up after 8 years of Obama "recovery".

    Black unemployment is at an all-time low - a mere year after Obama's "recovery" ended and a real recovery started.

    But, hey, you can always tout the Socialist weight-loss program! Venezuelans have lost an average of 20 lbs each under Chavez and Maduro! Yeah, if you're a kid under 20 lbs, you probably starved to death, but PROGRESS!!!!

  15. Re:There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is reason to doubt anything said by the Venezuelan government.

    There is reason to doubt anything said by ANY government.

    Fixed that for you....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  16. reserves are useless... by k3v0 · · Score: 2

    you can't pull your oil reserves out of the ground if the folks working the wells have no food

  17. WTF?!?!! Venezuela is a "progressive" hell-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    What the fuck are you trying to do, distract from the "progressive" Socialist government of Venezuela running the country with the largest oil reserves on Earth into a poverty-stricken hell-hole with massive starvation?

    CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuelans reported losing on average 11 kilograms (24 lbs) in body weight last year and almost 90 percent now live in poverty, according to a new university study on the impact of a devastating economic crisis and food shortages.

    The annual survey, published on Wednesday by three universities, is one of the most closely-followed assessments of Venezuelans’ well being amid a government information vacuum and shows a steady rise in poverty and hunger in recent years.

    Over 60 percent of Venezuelans surveyed said that during the previous three months they had woken up hungry because they did not have enough money to buy food. About a quarter of the population was eating two or less meals a day, the study showed.

    Last year, the three universities found that Venezuelans said they had lost an average of 8 kilograms during 2016. This time, the study’s dozen investigators surveyed 6,168 Venezuelans between the ages of 20 and 65 across the country of 30 million people.

    ...

    1. Re:WTF?!?!! Venezuela is a "progressive" hell-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You think these anti-American socialist governments fail all on their own? They are targeted and attacked relentlessly by the CIA, the UN, the World Bank, the IMF etc. etc. etc..

    2. Re:WTF?!?!! Venezuela is a "progressive" hell-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source?

    3. Re:WTF?!?!! Venezuela is a "progressive" hell-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      There is more than enough evidence if you care to look. Starting with US backed attempted coup in 2002. If you don't understand the history of US imperialism in Central/South America, then you need a better understanding of history.

      https://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php/venezuela-revenge-mad-dog-empire

    4. Re:WTF?!?!! Venezuela is a "progressive" hell-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/apr/21/usa.venezuela

    5. Re:WTF?!?!! Venezuela is a "progressive" hell-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true patriot (as well as someone with limited understanding of historical context).

    6. Re:WTF?!?!! Venezuela is a "progressive" hell-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes!! They DO fall on their own. Again with all the blame to USA. How on earth is the CIA attacking them? and if it is, would it be possible that it's because Venezuela turned to a big cartel? These governments starts profiting for their own at the costs of millions of people diying/starving/losing all they own and blame everything on whoever they can.

      I'm sorry, but it's so evident. All the government's people suddenly start having mansions and millions of dollars, luxury travels, and other kind of privileges while they continue to say that they are fighting an economic war, all the fault is [some other country or big company] and incredibly, some people buy it. The first thing they do is start to buy all the media companys so the only "narrative" there are in the news is theirs. Source: every "socialist"/near-comunist country in the freaking world.

      The worst thing is the OP is modded Funny and the comment I'm replying to, Insightful.

    7. Re:WTF?!?!! Venezuela is a "progressive" hell-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny that it's always fuckers who didn't have to live in a communist dictatorship that talk shit about "historical context" and "that wasn't true communism" (TM)

    8. Re:WTF?!?!! Venezuela is a "progressive" hell-hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... all that "historical context" shit huh? That's called history buddy. Learn some. Your worldview would certainly be more informed.

  18. Re:There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    There is reason to doubt anything said by the Venezuelan government.

    There is also reason to doubt anything said about cryptocurrencies. That's why I bought in. Two negatives make a positive, right? Right?

    Umm, one other thing. Anyone here know how to reverse a PayPal transfer? This, umm, friend, ordered a computer or something off eBay and it never arrived.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  19. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Distrust by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

    They say blockchain currencies are based on trust, but can you trust anything Maduro says? Venezuela is another proof point as to why Communism and Nepotism are usually found together. Maduro will undoubtedly funnel what's left of the treasury to his family as they exit the country, just as Chavez did.

    --
    Organization? You must be joking..
  22. Venezuela... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now there is a country who has never had its election manipulated by anyone. Certainly not the US. And is thus of no use to the systematic propaganda news of today. And I find it sad that the Venezulan people do not agree with the neo-cons on who should be their leader and it is almost certain that the independent election monitors who deemed the election fair were probably drunk.

  23. Commies are bad with money? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Venezuela: where you can get cannibalism and a Mad Max apocalypse in real life.

    3 socialism

    1. Re:Commies are bad with money? Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The US, where you can send your daughter to UNC Chapel Hill and she gets killed by scum who rode the bus over from Durham.

      You see, things are not much different in REAL LIFE, son.

    2. Re:Commies are bad with money? Who knew? by bobbied · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The US, where you can send your daughter to UNC Chapel Hill and she gets killed by scum who rode the bus over from Durham.

      You see, things are not much different in REAL LIFE, son.

      Bad things happen everywhere and the USA is no exception. All senseless killing is to be condemned.. However..

      In Venezuela, senseless killing is a lot more common these days, as is politically motivated shooting of opposition candidates. Venezuela has never been the paragon of safety, but there isn't a place in the USA which is as dangerous as walking down the street in Caracas these days. These people have NO food, medical care or prospects for finding any. The government is literally controlling EVERYTHING and is likely getting set to default on their latest loan payments so they will have nothing to give to the population. Desperate hungry people are fighting to survive, bloody violence is the way this kind of thing goes, if history is any indicator.

      RDU isn't a perfect place but it's a lot less risky than Caracas as RDU isn't full of hungry desperate people with no prospects.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Commies are bad with money? Who knew? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the only difference being that the odds of anything like that occurring to an individual in the US are miniscule in comparison to Venezuela, so when it does happen here, it's all over the media because it's so rare, unlike the 650 people who were murdered in Chicago last year...that's not newsworthy. CLUE: Stay outta shitholes, and you don't have much to concern yourself with.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re:Commies are bad with money? Who knew? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Yup, 57 murders per 100,000 people in Venezuela last year. The US rate?...4.88

      Stick it troll.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  24. Re:There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan by hawk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure, I believe them--but there was an error in transcription.

    It wasn't actually 735M USD, but 735M Venezuelan.

    The dictator tried to buy lunch with it, but had to settle for a small soda . . . :)

    hawk

  25. At least it's backed by something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not like 99% of all the other craptocurrencies.

  26. Re: do you want americans to liberate your country by Type44Q · · Score: 2

    Bottom-feeding fucktard. Sigh.

  27. Re:There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    The idea itself *almost* has merit.

    Ween OPEC countries off the US dollar as a trading currency, reinvest the profits in new industries that help diversify oil-state economies when electric vehicles become the norm thus helping fight climate change by reducing the global demand for petrol.

    Alas, it's Venezuela, where the cult of Hugo seems to have spiralled out of control in Mugabean proportions.

  28. Re:Waking up to the realities of socialism, kiddie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Context matters little to you I see. Countries don't "fail" in isolation or without outside help.

  29. Re:There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

    Ween OPEC countries off the US dollar as a trading currency [...]

    Actually, as an aside, that's one of those things that can easily put you on the US list of "evil" countries.

    Iraq accepting euros instead of dollars? They're evil and we must invade!
    Iran accepting euros instead of dollars? They're evil and we must have sanctions!
    Venezuela accepting euros or yuan (or trade) instead of dollars? They must be stopped!

    Meanwhile, if you trade your oil in dollars, you can pretty much do whatever the heck you want.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Translation: by slashdotiscompromisd · · Score: 1

    i don't like venezuela because the news tells me its bad and its failures are due to its leader not to the crippling sanctions placed on it for being a sovereign nation independent of most western influence

    --
    My karma was manually wiped by site staff https://slashdot.org/~slshdtisctrldbysjws 18 mod up, 10 mod down = bad karma
    1. Re: Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, how much are you getting from posting your silly chavista propaganda here? Gotta lick a lot of asses for those couple of dollars you'll be getting, so that you can get drunk over the weekend with your other chavistas friends.

      By the way, ask your chavistas lords why is that when the petroleum was a sky-high price, Chavez asked for not one, but two loans from China, because of the crisis.

    2. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So fucking true... all problems in Venezuela are caused by the US...

      It was because of the US that the Venezuelan government allowed over 130k tons of food products to rot in 2012, and they tried to get rid of it before anyone found out, but they failed.

      It was because of the US that Venezuela made multimillionaire deals with companies like Odebrecht, to work on public projects which were promised to be completed even before Chavez died, but they are still unfinished.

      It was because of the US that Venezuela's economy became dependent on petroleum in 94%, when even after Chavez took over, the country generated a diversity of products aside from petroleum, which they exported.

      It was because of the US that Chavez decided to sell petroleum to Cuba at super-low prices, with the excuse that it was a cooperation between the two countries, from which we got "doctors", a lot of which escaped to neighboring countries.

      Yes... it was because of the US... The US, the opposition, the private corporations, Rajoy and Spain, Uribe, Santos and Colombia, the lizard that gets on the power cables and causes blackouts, and of course, the cow. It is always the fault of the cow... *sigh*

  32. Obvious by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    No need for a deep dive here, anyone who knows anything that has been happening in Venezuela for the past decade or so would know this petro thing is just another scam bullshit.

    If people are not aware of this, the Maduro proto-dictatorship already "nationalized" (read stolen) a whole bunch of stuff:
    Petroleum companies that had a whole ton of American investment:
    https://www.nytimes.com/1975/0...
    https://venezuelanalysis.com/n...
    Toys from private business:
    https://edition.cnn.com/2016/1...
    General Motors factory:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    It's just a continuation of Chavez sociodictatorship running the entire country to the ground. Brazil, with some stupid socialist politicians, also lent money for some business there which was promptly stolen and their government already announced they are giving nothing back.
    The only hope I have left is that all the people behind those decisions end up in jail, because most of them are likely to receive a corruption sentence in the wave of revelations that have been happening for a good part of the past half decade or so.
    And unfortunately, venezuelans are likely to keep receiving the short end of the stick until they can get rid of their so called socialist president who's actually a dictator and his entire ilk, party and everything else.
    Because they will keep abusing their power... 'till half the population is dead from famine, mark my words. It's the populist plague that infected a whole bunch of south american countries, including mine. Huge swaths of the respective populations were all swayed into their discourse, with some bullshit talk about humble origins and fighting against the mid to upper class, and we're all now in deep deep shit with huge corruption schemes, and organized crime running the countries. It'll be an entire lost decade or more for several south american countries.

  33. Re:Waking up to the realities of socialism, kiddie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you want 'your' team to take credit for the economy over the last 12 months... ignoring the fact that the previous administration dragged the economy out of a disaster. Apparently the orange shit-gibbon, bankrupt, and celebrity used-car salesman, who can barely string a sentence together, has made everything great again. As long as you were born wealthy, of course.

  34. Re: do you want americans to liberate your country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With name like Smuckers, it has to be good

    You know Trump would be all over grape jelly

  35. Re:There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    I don't think Her Majesty's Government would do anything that was in any way underhand or less than honourable.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  36. Re:There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    There is reason to doubt anything said by the Venezuelan government.

    There is reason to doubt anything said by ANY government.

    Fixed that for you....

    No there's not. Many governments around the world some level of accountability that makes them trustworthy in a lot of things they say. Now there's no reason to trust any government universally on every topic, but that's a big separation from doubting every(any)thing.

  37. Re:There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    There is reason to be skeptical of ANY government. But you can't just paint them all with the same broad brush. There's a big difference between that shithole and it's "leadership", and the vast majority of others.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  38. Re:There's little reason to believe the Venezuelan by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Nice strawman, when's the movie come out?

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  39. Re: do you want americans to liberate your country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US gets paid by forcing the destroyed country to reconstruct infrastructures with expensive US contractors and allies. That's how they checkmate a country and get paid for winnning....