Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Deploys Over 300 Powerwalls To Give Hawaiian School Kids AC (electrek.co)

Fred Lambert reports via Electrek: As part of a state initiative, Tesla deployed over 300 Powerwalls in schools to cool down hot classrooms in Hawaii. Hawaii has a problem with hot temperatures in public classrooms that is affecting students negatively. The problem was so significant that the Hawaii State Department of Education had to intervene. They put together a $100 million fund, which has already helped cool down 1,190 classrooms to date, with contracts set for more than 1,300 classrooms, according to The Garden Island. In order to roll out the program without significantly increasing energy costs for public schools, they partnered with Tesla to pair Powerwalls with solar power to reduce the impact of running the air conditioners in classrooms across the state. It also resulted in an interesting learning opportunity about renewable energy and energy storage for students.

147 comments

  1. $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is wrong with Education Departments?

    1. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by muphin · · Score: 3, Informative

      well that only equals $40k per classroom :) Air conditioners + solar panels + batteries + labour

      --
      It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
    2. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might want to check your calculator ... $84,000 per classroom is what I see.

    3. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      School happens primarily during the day. Heat is primarily a problem when the sun is shining brightest. The schools already have an electrical connection to the grid.

      Explain again why they needed power-wall batteries for each installation instead of just using the solar power directly when it was needed the most (on hot, sunny days, which generate the most solar power) and relying on a little bit of to/from grid action at other times if necessary?

      This sounds an awful lot like a publicity stunt, i.e. kids + batteries + renewable science, now everyone sing kumbaya!!!

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    4. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A wise investment all around, free air conditioning, but so much more. In the event of an emergency school gymnasiums are often utilized as shelters. Hawaii being in the ring of fire most likely deals with some pretty crazy weather along with earthquakes etc, and if they don't yet, then as weather patterns continue to deteriorate they soon will. A shelter which is immune to fuel shortages, immune to grid outages and capable of doing things like running washers/dryers/coffe pots/air conditioners and induction cookers could be utilized to save many many lives. Combined with low power LED lights these units are poised to completely change the severity of devestation by removing the weak link in the chain which is power generation centralization.

      What we need now is to remove restrictions on home owners completely shutting off their grid access if they so choose. In many places the utility companies which have become private entities utilize their wealth and power to get laws written which prohibit people from simply cutting their grid access or from supplementing it.

      Of course I would vote for hounding such people with guns knives and pitchforks and cutting their skin off on television as a show of force to utility companies that we are in charge and mean business. However I suppose simply allowing time nature and engineering to make it all a moot point is a good way to go as well. Still...goddamn would it be fun to rip utility higher ups to bloody pieces with a smile.

    5. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previous article said $90,000 per classroom, and the teachers were pissed that Trump is pissing away this money instead of giving it to them. They need this money. Trump is starving teachers to death, and now he is giving luxuries to children while teachers die.

    6. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      Heat is primarily a problem when the sun is shining brightest.

      It's Hawaii, man. It's hot all day. Additionally, buildings function as heat sinks.

      School is about seven hours, Hawaii gets 14.5 hrs of near-equatorial sun in June. That's 7.5 hrs of storage, assuming the AC is set back outside of school hours.

      Also, power is crazy-expensive in Hawaii which is one of the reasons so many people there do solar.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      +1 for that AC. The power stays on for the community when needed.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by russotto · · Score: 1

      With some rather generous assumptions -- a 42,000 BTU, 5.3KW unit costing $10,000 (installed) in each classroom, 180 days of school per year with the unit operating at full power for 10 hours a day -- I get break even in 9 years assuming no additional expenses. This isn't terrible but I suspect with more realistic assumptions break even would take much longer.

    9. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      free air conditioning

      Except for one thing, you forgot the $100,000,000.

      The only way I see this making any sense is if the current Hawaiian electrical infrastructure simply can not supply the demand of these added air conditioners. Otherwise it is just a publicity stunt all while Tesla once again sucks away on the tit of the taxpayer funded government.

    10. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by glenebob · · Score: 1

      In other words, there's plenty of solar energy available exactly when it's needed to cool the class rooms.

      So, as GP asked, what's the point of the batteries?

    11. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you reach the break even point, it will be time to replace the batteries in the Powerwall unit.

    12. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price doesn't matter, you keep imagining a one time expensive cost is somehow a bad thing. So what if it costs more?

      The value in being independent from the grid and all that comes with it is worth this cost many times over.

      Regardless of the cost, what you get from it is the ability to operate during a power outage, the ability to operate during a disaster, the ability to control increase or decrease your energy harvesting. The utility from such a move makes it powerful far beyond simply the bottom line.

      I imagine that you prefer to heat your home with diesel as well. It is the lowering of the cost I suppose. However you are not thinking long term, what if the price changes (which it does), what if your unable to get a diesel truck for resupply (which happens), what if you piss off the wrong guy at the supply company and they just cut you off? Having control is valuable in many many ways. That is just on a personal level, imagine it on a state or national level. However staying on the personal level, your children would inherit a house where they would never see an energy bill, your family blood line for generations could benefit far past your own inevitable shuffling of the mortal coil. These decisions are building a legacy that will outlive us and continue to aid our descendants far into the future.

      Switching to the governmental level, the power of having a system of buildings each one operating independently would mean that no targeted strike beyond a nuke would be able to disrupt the activities of the people. As a matter of national security it makes sense to have a distributed grid. Time and again we see the power of distributed computing, the power of distributed file sharing, the power of distributed financials like bitcoin and block chain. This engineering principle of distribution definitely has something going for it and it should be mandatory that any new building created is capable of operating independently of the grid.

    13. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Bill clearly stated, 14.5 hours of solar during 7.5 hours of school, hard to do without the batteries.

    14. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not hard to make more teachers, einstein.

    15. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by jandjmh · · Score: 5, Informative

      Heat lags peak solar by several hours. Hawaii's grid can't absorb the excess generated at nonn, and strains to supply the need as consumption ramps up just as solar is starting to fall. Some storage to time shift the produced solar power by a few hours is pretty much mandatory, once solar starts to be a large fraction of the total supply. You also need the storage to smooth out sudden dips likes a storm blowing in. Solar production can drop by 80% in a fraction of an hour. That's not a problem if solar is only a few percent of your energy mix, but it can lead to grid instability if the solar is meeting nearly 100% of the total demand at noon, and the conventional power plant is idling near zero output. Fossil fuel plants take time to ramp up. Battery storage (or other grid scale storage) is mandatory for a stable supply once solar (or solar and wind) become a large percentage of total supply.

    16. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 2

      There's only 2 reasons for a powerwall:
      The grid is unreliable/too remote
      The local net energy metering situation sucks

    17. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Consider, fuel for generators comes from the mainland. Grid electricity is expensive in Hawaii.

      Meanwhile, solar is highly effective in Hawaii.

    18. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With some rather generous assumptions -- a 42,000 BTU, 5.3KW unit costing $10,000 (installed) in each classroom, 180 days of school per year with the unit operating at full power for 10 hours a day -- I get break even in 9 years assuming no additional expenses. This isn't terrible but I suspect with more realistic assumptions break even would take much longer.

      The thing I'm curious about is whether the buildings need updated or replaced. The effective R value in commercial buildings tends to be bad, though it doesn't have to be. Reduce the window count. Try to minimize the thermal bridges, particularly the metal ones. Maybe use insulated concrete forms, that way you have vast amount of thermal mass to keep the facility at a more constant temperature. Use a basement.

      I'm not sure how much savings you would get, since the occupants generate a fair amount of heat themselves, but I'd bet it makes sense to design new buildings with more care, given the cost of energy in that area.

    19. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Insulation in Hawaii is generally crap. And forget true basements; what Hawaiians calls a basement is just the lower level of a house built on a slope.

    20. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      14.5 hours of solar during 7.5 hours of school, hard to do without the batteries.

      Easier (and cheaper) to do it without the batteries. Just feed excess power into the grid, and draw out to cover peak demand.

      I can't see how batteries make any sense at all for this application. The only plausible explanation is that it is all a stupid PR stunt funded by the taxpayers.

    21. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Consider, fuel for generators comes from the mainland. Grid electricity is expensive in Hawaii.

      Meanwhile, solar is highly effective in Hawaii.

      I'm sure the coal lobby is desperate to start doing investigative mining.

      If they're not successful, they'l be more than happy to ship coal from the mainland... /s

    22. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teachers are state or county employees, not Federal.

    23. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100,000,000 Ã 2490 = 40,160.64

    24. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The local net energy metering situation sucks

      Bingo. This is the situation in Hawaii. Power retails for 42 cents/kwhr, about 4 times the highest mainland rate. Solar is currently about 10 cents/kwhr, and federal subsidies push that even lower. So Helco doesn't want to give up 42 cents to get something worth 10 cents. They no longer allow any new net metering installations.

      This is, of course, stupid. But from Helco's point of view it makes sense, since they are in the business of maximizing profit from their monopoly market, not serving the public, and the PUC is bought and paid for.

      So Hawaiians get one stupid policy ($100M Powerwalls for daytime use) to counteract another stupid policy (no net metering). This is what happens in a one-party state (there are no Republicans in Hawaii).

      Hawaii also has zero geothermal energy, despite some of the best volcanic geology in the world, for equally stupid political and bureaucratic reasons.

    25. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Hawaii isn't on the Ring of Fire. It has volcanoes, and the earthquakes that come with them, but it is in the middle of the Pacific. The Ring of Fire follows plate boundaries around the outside of the Pacific - from Chile up the coast of South and North America to Alaska, around to Japan, and down to New Zealand through Micronesia and Melanesia, with a branch off through the Philippines and around to Indonesia. Hawaii is one of those isolated spots of activity mid plate that pop up in a few places (Iceland is another).

    26. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is for 1300 classrooms total, of which they have done 1190.

    27. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by gravewax · · Score: 2

      yep typical politicians piling one poorly thought out policy on top of another, with Tesla their to cash in on the bad decisions. Not that I blame Tesla for that, if government is stupid enough to give away money you may as well put your hand out.

    28. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      geez if only Hawaii had some other more efficient and reliable sources of energy like Geo Thermal, shame they are in a region of the world with no such good alternatives,

    29. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by gweihir · · Score: 2

      They do not get that their work is absolutely critical for the future of a nation. Or rather those that decide the budget and staffing of education departments do not get that and place 2nd and 3rd rate people there and give them too little budget to do the job well in addition. The underlying problem is that politicians cannot see or plan beyond the next election and bad education has an effect that is delayed by 10 years or so and then only ramps up over time. That bad education continues to have a negative effect for something like 50 years and longer if you add indirect effects (teachers being taught badly as children usually teach badly themselves...) is completely beyond the comprehension of political "leaders".

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    30. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kids need AC. Anonymous Coward is not a cheap feature!

    31. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you really ask why do solar panels need batteries? It's almost like the power they generate isn't smooth and they needed something to help with that.

      You know, I hear capacitors help smooth out energy curves. Maybe a big capacitor? Oh! Like a....

      Battery.

    32. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 2

      Sounds about right. I'm also betting nobody bothered to explore low tech solutions like shade and reflective paint. Where I live it's as hot as Hawaii and schools get by without AC.

    33. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by shilly · · Score: 1

      + HIDOE’s heat abatement efforts also consist of installing ceiling fans, using nighttime ventilation, painting roofs with heat-reflective coating and extending shade + Solar-powered weather stations mounted on these schools transmit data to a receiver in the school office, which is then posted to the new HIDOE Thermal Comfort website. Indoor classroom temperatures are monitored by the use of 737 data loggers that record the temperature and humidity every 30 minutes

    34. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by shilly · · Score: 2

      If only there were articles describing the other efforts being funded by the $100m. Like "HIDOE’s heat abatement efforts also consist of installing ceiling fans, using nighttime ventilation, painting roofs with heat-reflective coating and extending shade."

    35. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      School happens primarily during the day.

      Yeah, and it's not like the school cafeterias need refrigeration to store food.

      relying on a little bit of to/from grid action at other times if necessary?

      Because electricity from the grid in Hawaii is devilishly-expensive, over USD $0.40/kWh, and much of it comes from burning diesel fuel that must be imported by huge tanker ships that burn even more fossil-fuels. More than likely it's also designed so that extra electricity generated will be sold back into the grid and offset costs while reducing pollution and fossil-fuel use even further.

      It's like the Left hates Musk because Musk is doing all the cool things they thought a huge nanny-state government would do for them while adding insult to injury by doing it better and cheaper than the government could. Nannies don't do cool stuff, they just nanny.

    36. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that, is why Governments run Microsoft software.

      You know what I'm talking about.

    37. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be the payback on a diesel or LPG generators at 50% of the schools?
      You could also try tri-generation and use some waste heat on cooling for a tad more efficiency .
      42 cents mean most homes and hotels should be converting to solar big time.

    38. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      and the earthquakes that come with them

      As those are shield volcanoes, the region should be fairly stable, seismically...

    39. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Elon Musk

    40. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      School happens primarily during the day. Heat is primarily a problem when the sun is shining brightest. The schools already have an electrical connection to the grid.

      Explain again why they needed power-wall batteries for each installation instead of just using the solar power directly when it was needed the most (on hot, sunny days, which generate the most solar power) and relying on a little bit of to/from grid action at other times if necessary?

      This sounds an awful lot like a publicity stunt, i.e. kids + batteries + renewable science, now everyone sing kumbaya!!!

      Silly questions but I'll try to answer it in a factual manner. On the Hawaiian archipelago they generate anywhere from 60-75% of their electrical energy (depending on which island you are on) with oil of all things. That and the fact that Hawaii is located in an area where solar panels should be quite efficient should result in there being a a good chance that the energy from the solar installation is considerably cheaper than the mains energy (In 2016, Hawaii actually had the highest electricity prices in the entire USA) so why not maximise the use of every spark of solar energy you can harvest even during periods of low sunlight? ... or should they be maximising the use of oil generated electricity and then sitting around a a big pile of extortionate electrical bills singing jolly songs in praise of the oil companies? If I was a Hawaiian I'd dimension my solar panel installation and battery pack in such a way that I'd never have to tap the grid for a single kilowatt all year round, the next thing I'd do after that would be to buy an electric car.

    41. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would you find coal on volcanic islands half as old as the time required for coal formation?

    42. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      14.5 hours of solar during 7.5 hours of school, hard to do without the batteries.

      Easier (and cheaper) to do it without the batteries. Just feed excess power into the grid, and draw out to cover peak demand.

      I can't see how batteries make any sense at all for this application.

      Public schools are open Saturdays and Sunday where you are, are they? But lets forget about weekends, since you could apparently have used an extra two days a week of learning.

      Kids leave around 3pm and get in around 9AM, give or take a half hour. So from 3:00PM-~6:30PM, the panels produce unused current and can be banked. Ditto for ~6AM-10:00AM before it gets hot.
      That is about 6.5 hours per day of sun stored (about 4.5 hours worth of 100% panel rated production). They can use the panels to drive the local AC during the peak time rather than pay a (private company) power bill that contributes to fuel imports and air pollution.

      Funny some people see groups of people pooling capital to advance their common interests as a divine right given by Jeebus when he wrote the Declaration of Independence if the group is labelled a "corporation", yet a horror if they are called a "government", or god help us, a "union".

      The only plausible explanation is that it is all a stupid PR stunt funded by the taxpayers.

      Or that you are ignorant and leap to conclusions based on irrationally formed preconceptions.

    43. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by wagnerer · · Score: 4, Informative

      People don't realize that Hawaii doesn't just have one electric grid. It has one for each island with a low capacity level on each one. The issue now, and how valid depends on how much trust you put into the utility, is that there is so much solar currently connected there are serious issues of grid stability. It was built with generators with slow response times and now you have MW of power that flash on and off with a passing cloud. Someone had to put a surge system in, not sure the schools are the best ones though.

    44. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Part of the issue there is build-up of heat over the day, causing that lag. With better sun screens, building design, insulation, and thermal mass, buildings can work well with solar generation in summer and winter, although not all of those options are going to be cost effective to retrofit for all buildings.

    45. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If buildings are sufficiently insulated, thermal inertia can serve the same purpose for short interruptions, but school buildings in Hawaii are probably not sufficiently insulated. Insulating them would be more disruptive than adding solar, due to changes needed in the fabric. Plus Tesla isn't going to offer insulation at cost, and I can't think of a company that would, and get sufficient publicity as ROI.

    46. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by jabuzz · · Score: 2

      Sorry Mary Poppins would disagree :-)

    47. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some such contracts battery replacements and long term maintenance, so battery replacement may be included. Typically, it also includes insurance or a bond to cover those items in event of the vendor going bust.

    48. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      School happens primarily during the day. Heat is primarily a problem when the sun is shining brightest.

      Well, there's your problem right there. Just implement a daylight savings time extreme in Hawaii, shifting the clocks by 12 hours.

      Send the little bastards to school at night!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    49. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by dwillden · · Score: 2

      Iceland is not a good example as it is right on the mid-oceanic ridge where the Atlantic is spreading at the juncture of two plates moving away from each other.

      A better mid continental hotspot example would be Yellowstone.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    50. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Please cite news reports of teachers dying due to insufficient pay. Teacher pay isn't great but even in the worst state it's well above the poverty line, even for first year teachers.

    51. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      It seems the plate map I looked at before posting was too low resolution - it looked like the plate boundary was almost as far east as UK/Ireland, and I was looking at the little red spot (indicating activity) to the NW a little bit inside the North American plate thinking that must be Iceland.

    52. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that geothermal would really only work on the big island, right? The rest of the islands are pretty much geologically inert at this point.

    53. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the coal lobby is desperate to start doing investigative mining.

      Do you even think before you type the stupid that comes out of your teeny tiny little brain? Do you realize that the Hawaiian islands are volcanoes that haven't existed for remotely enough time to have coal.

      But you know, don't let that interfere with you getting to go a do HERP DERP HERP DERP COAL COAL DERP DERP DERP DERP.

      Go fuck yourself, you DERP.

    54. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are literally dying, you fucking bigot!

    55. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they've done 1190 and have contracts for another 1300. This is 2490 classrooms total.

      The article is not clear on whether the $100m fund is for all of these classrooms, the initial buy, or a larger project of which this is only one phase.

    56. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      Explain again why they needed power-wall batteries for each installation instead of just using the solar power directly when it was needed the most

      Electricity is relatively expensive in Hawaii. If they are buying panels anyway to offset AC consumption, it could easily make economic sense to buy batteries. The batteries allow them to continue using those panels even when the kids aren't in class.

      And I don't buy the argument that they could just feed the excess power into the grid. Where I live, the utility company pays jack compared to what they charge. I double the value of my generation if I store/use instead of sell/buy. This makes batteries a very good economic decision---in my area, at least.

      In Hawaii, it looks like there is a feed-in tariff. So going with batteries, you eliminate that right off the bat. I couldn't find published rates, but if Hawaiian Electric works like my utility, those batteries will pay for themselves well before their expiration.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    57. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you reading impaired...push excess to the grid, pull deficiencies when needed. The 'battery' is the grid.
      But I guess kickbacks are good.

    58. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In humid areas, shade and reflective paint do squat. I lived in Arizona and southern California, and it works when in dry climates, not humid like Hawaii.

    59. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Tesla wants to do a publicity stunt, how about visiting Puerto Rico?

    60. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they could have hot humid cloudy days? Perhaps demand from the air-conditioners, lights and classroom computers at some times can exceed supply from the solar panels? Then it's better and more reliable to have batteries to stabilize power output.

    61. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      Utilities in Hawaii are not very grid-tie friendly

    62. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that there are religious reasons that would prevent geothermal energy development. They think of their volcanoes as being like volatile women who are to be respected. Then that puts all sorts of taboos on drilling and industrial exploration.

      Then also, the insurance on having a power station right next to an active volcano would be stratospheric.

    63. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The left always like to thing along the lines of "How can we best make do with what resources we already have and redistribute them fairly?"

      So they would prefer to remain stuck with high electricity prices and have taxation on the wealthy to pay the high electricity bills of the poor.

      When someone comes along with the ability to bring down energy prices to close to zero, suddenly their whole economic model pops like a bubble and the left have no purpose.

    64. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I doubt it has anything to do with democrats versus republicans.
      It simply is the idea of americans that money rules the world.

      Regarding geothermal power, it is not so easy to use geothermal power to create electricity. Not hot enough. And on Hawaii you don't need it for heating. So I doubt there are any "political" reasons against geothermal power.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    65. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      $100m toward utility level solar PV and some storage, minus $5M or so to put mini-splits in classrooms, would yield much more bang for the buck, but its a political win when you can talk Tesla AND schools, the masses have no clue.

    66. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Sorry Mary Poppins would disagree :-)

      Well naturally, That evil Poppins woman created the Umbrella Corp and doomed Racoon City. after all.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    67. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the island is so completely Democratic, there's no way to use this as a wedge issue to pressure politicians. That's the problem. Notice GP said "one-party state", not "controlled by Democrats state". The smaller the political pool, the larger your problems.

    68. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With no net metering the only way solar makes sense is if you have batteries or the solar install is so small that it produces less than your minimum daytime power use.

    69. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Heat lags peak solar by several hours. Hawaii's grid can't absorb the excess generated at nonn, and strains to supply the need as consumption ramps up just as solar is starting to fall. Some storage to time shift the produced solar power by a few hours is pretty much mandatory, once solar starts to be a large fraction of the total supply. You also need the storage to smooth out sudden dips likes a storm blowing in. Solar production can drop by 80% in a fraction of an hour. That's not a problem if solar is only a few percent of your energy mix, but it can lead to grid instability if the solar is meeting nearly 100% of the total demand at noon, and the conventional power plant is idling near zero output. Fossil fuel plants take time to ramp up. Battery storage (or other grid scale storage) is mandatory for a stable supply once solar (or solar and wind) become a large percentage of total supply.

      Nat Gas and even hydro generation can ramp fast enough to deal with wind variability, it is more challenging for solar in a small area where you can have those massive swings but it doesn't have to be 100% battery backup.

    70. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly why you go the battery route and say F-you to the local grid. Two can play this game. If you're going to make your power so expensive, tell ya what, I'll just unplug and go 100% renewable without you. Keep your grid!

    71. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Yeah! By God, when I was their age, I had to walk to school! In the snow! Up hill! Both Ways!

      Sweating builds character.

      Now get the hell off my lawn!

    72. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like the Left hates Musk...

      I don't think they do. You know Elon is fairly left-leaning, don't you? With the renewable energy/concern for the environment, UBI, etc.... And the poster you're responding to sounds rather right-wing-ish as well, so I don't know why you decided to whip out such a non-sequitur (and worthless) comment.

    73. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    74. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 2 possibilities: either the solar panels provide enough power to run the AC units without batteries, or they don't provide enough power.

      If they do provide enough, then the other 7+ hours of sunlight can be stored in the batteries to offset some of the schools other electrical needs.

      If they do not provide enough power, then they'll need those additional daylight hours to bank some extra juice to help run the ACs during the day.

      There is no option where the power walls are not useful.

    75. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Since most of the population and industry are on O'ahu, with the other islands being largely rural and agricultural, it seems to be a good test case. If it works, then see if it can scale down to the smaller islands where the benefits would presumably be lower and the challenges greater.

    76. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      The challenge then would be getting it to O'ahu where most of it is needed. That's at least 300km total. Presuming you could run cable on land or underground on Moloka'i and Maui, you'd still need at least 60km of cable to get from Maui to the Big Island. Maybe more. I have no idea what that would cost. I'm guessing more than a little. We're not talking about a data signal, but actual power, and lots of it.

    77. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      If native Hawaiians are freaking out over a telescope being built on a "holy mountain", what exactly do you think their reaction to tapping that holy source of heat would be?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_Mauna_Kea_Observatories

    78. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the article. The money will also be used to cover things like: installing ceiling fans, using nighttime ventilation, painting roofs with heat-reflective coating and extending shade. The fund aims to eventually cool down all classrooms.

    79. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The $100M will be used for a number of things. In addition to air conditioners and grid infrastructure improvements, the HIDOE’s heat abatement efforts also consist of installing ceiling fans, using nighttime ventilation, painting roofs with heat-reflective coating and extending shade.

    80. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      How much natural gas and hydro power does Oahu have? We're talking about a special case here, not like anything on the mainland.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    81. Re:$100 million for 2490 classrooms? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Do we leftists hate Musk? I must have missed the last Masters of Socialism meeting.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    82. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Bengie · · Score: 1

      From the Midwest here. High humidity and 70f can feel down right hot. I have trouble sleeping when it's 60f and 100% humidity. Get all sweaty and sticky. It's like you feel cold and hot at the same time. Horrible.

    83. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by Bengie · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, the batteries are expected to maintain 100% of their rated power for 10 years, assuming a full rated battery cycle every day. You could replace the battery after 10 years, but it should at least still hold 80% charge and expected to be at 100% and down to 80% after 20 years.

    84. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by interstellarsurfer · · Score: 1

      So, power would be free for everyone during the day, and exhorbitantly expensive at night, or in a monsoon? The powerwalls help balance the grid load, which makes it a net positive for the school, and everyone else in the communities.

    85. Re: $100 million for 2490 classrooms? by EricTheO · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume that there is bright sun all day in Hawaii? That batteries allow for a more consistent supply of power, i.e., when it rains or cloud cover is heavy or the angle of the sun does not allow peak power output from the solar panels.

      --
      -Eric
  2. Wow! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

    Hawaii has a problem with hot temperatures in public classrooms that is affecting students negatively.

    For sure? Have studies been done? Is Hawaii hot? Wow, new info for me!

    But seriously, this is the kind of stuff that will keep giving back to Tesla, they may be "giving away" a lot of stuff, but they are actually building the network that will be the foundation for the future and they are getting their foot in the door before GE or some other huge infrastructure company gets a foothold on the technology.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      giving away? Tesla ainted giving away shit. The tax payer is funding this, Tesla is sucking at the proverbial tit at their inflated prices.

    2. Re:Wow! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      giving away? Tesla ainted giving away shit. The tax payer is funding this

      So? This is the kind of thing the government SHOULD be paying for.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Wow! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Hawaii has a problem with hot temperatures in public classrooms that is affecting students negatively.

      For sure? Have studies been done? Is Hawaii hot? Wow, new info for me!

      New info for me, too.

      I lived on Oahu for a year way back in the '70s. When we moved in, we opened all the windows in the house. When we left, we closed them. Never needed A/C, never needed heat. Hell, with the windows there (think large venetian blinds - the glass was cut into 10cm strips that rotated when you cranked the handle to open/close them), A/C would have been pretty much impossible anyways....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hawaii has a problem with hot temperatures in public classrooms that is affecting students negatively.

      For sure? Have studies been done? Is Hawaii hot? Wow, new info for me!

      But seriously, this is the kind of stuff that will keep giving back to Tesla, they may be "giving away" a lot of stuff, but they are actually building the network that will be the foundation for the future and they are getting their foot in the door before GE or some other huge infrastructure company gets a foothold on the technology.

      What technology? Batteries? Solar Panels? Tesla has zero technology foothold on anybody when it comes to solar, except possibly in solar shingles. They have a brand and marketing advantage because people love Musk, and he's a master at getting government $$. He knows the brand, even if it costs more, is something politicians can sell.

  3. Was /. Down earlier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it went down on my DAMN balls

  4. Nice PR move, but .... by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These Powerwalls just don't add up as truly economic solutions if you're a regular customer buying at Tesla's asking price.

    Same problem Tesla has with those solar roof shingles. The estimated cost to cover the average size roof on a home makes them totally non-competitive with regular panels.

    I really hope I'll see this change in my lifetime, and even better if it's fairly quickly. But battery technology really hasn't evolved at that fast of a pace. Much of the gains we've seen in how long you can go before needing to recharge a laptop or a phone have more to do with CPUs and other components increasing their efficiency.

    Plus, the whole battery making process is REALLY environmentally dirty. The more batteries we use, the more negative environmental impact that production creates -- and right now, companies like Tesla are really trying NOT to address that issue. (It's nice to promise all the "feel good" things about batteries being able to be recycled over and over whenever they wear out, but many, many NEW batteries need to be manufactured to meet the needs for battery powered automobiles and power capture for PV solar. We're FAR from a point where all the batteries we'd ever need already exist can can just be re-used on demand!)

    1. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shingles to panels isn't a straight comparison. The shingles are designed to be a complete roof solution, and last longer than a conventional roof. They're not targeting customers in the market for panels. They're targeting customers doing new construction, or needing to replace a roof. Then the comparison is conventional roof, or comparably-priced roof that lasts longer and generates power.

    2. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same problem Tesla has with those solar roof shingles. The estimated cost to cover the average size roof on a home makes them totally non-competitive with regular panels.

      Yes, except that the point of the roof shingles is that they don't look ugly as sin like normal panels.

    3. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUD.

      The economics are quickly coming into focus in the more expensive energy markets (such as Hawaii) and Lithium batteries are much more environmentally friendly than earlier battery tech. Lithium can be stripped from dead salt lakes or as a byproduct of desalination plants, and as an element is infinitely recyclable, and cobalt has been discarded for years in the slag piles of nickel mines, all they have to do is stop throwing it away.

      We'll get there, stop being so negative about rapidly progressing tech.

    4. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for progress but it right to intimately know the costs involved to get there. If there is FUD, then either the FUD is outright true or otherwise, people haven't done a good enough job pointing out how we can overcome the FUD or show how it is not a big concern.

    5. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      The estimated cost to cover the average size roof on a home makes them totally non-competitive with regular panels.

      Only if you ignore the fact that the energy generated over their lifetime gets you a free roof and maintenance and tidy profit.

      Plus, the whole battery making process is REALLY environmentally dirty.

      Compared to what? Burning more petrol and coal and gas? Creating more nuclear waste? Plus we haven't really started recycling those batteries on a large scale yet because the vast majority of them are still working.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by supremebob · · Score: 1

      You got to hand it to Tesla's PR department, though. If this was ANY other solar sell or battery manufacturer, this wouldn't be front page news.

      Elon pretty much has the tech press trained to track his every bowel movement at this point.

    7. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These Powerwalls just don't add up as truly economic solutions if you're a regular customer buying at Tesla's asking price.

      Same problem Tesla has with those solar roof shingles. The estimated cost to cover the average size roof on a home makes them totally non-competitive with regular panels.

      I really hope I'll see this change in my lifetime, and even better if it's fairly quickly. But battery technology really hasn't evolved at that fast of a pace. Much of the gains we've seen in how long you can go before needing to recharge a laptop or a phone have more to do with CPUs and other components increasing their efficiency.

      Plus, the whole battery making process is REALLY environmentally dirty. The more batteries we use, the more negative environmental impact that production creates -- and right now, companies like Tesla are really trying NOT to address that issue. (It's nice to promise all the "feel good" things about batteries being able to be recycled over and over whenever they wear out, but many, many NEW batteries need to be manufactured to meet the needs for battery powered automobiles and power capture for PV solar. We're FAR from a point where all the batteries we'd ever need already exist can can just be re-used on demand!)

      For a "regular customer", you are right. The market is not regular customers, unless they are just early adopters and want to have the latest new thing anyway. In niche markets, like Hawaii with high rates or the Australia system needing grid stability, there is a good chance of being cost effective.

      When comparing roof costs, your idea of the "average" house size makes a big difference. Up until the late 70's in the US an average home size for a family of 4 was around 750sqft. In late 00's it was pushing 2500-3000sqft. I haven't checked lately but myself and my children are all planning to buy or build homes at 1000 sqft max, probably 750. The problem is zoning and building codes that don't allow building smaller. We don't want a giant energy wasting McMansion. I think most young people see the cost, current wages, future collapse of social security, etc, and refuse to "live large" like our wasteful forebears the boomers. Anyway, small roof, small cost, modest energy generation, but paired with modest energy consumption it's plenty. In my area with a stable grid and cheap rates solar is stupid expensive compared to asphalt shingles and a meter. Off-grid cabin in the middle of nowhere it starts to look good though.

      Your 3rd paragraph hits the nail right on the head. Efficiency is key. Not only getting more from less, such as LED vs incandescent, but also things like heat pumps and more energy efficient construction methods.

      This "dirty" production is not such a problem I think. There was a massive lead problem until car batteries started being recycled near 100% too. We will reach a point where mining goes quite low eventually. I think these new battery technologies are much better than lead-acid. It's not all rainbows and unicorn farts, but still a damn sight better than lead poisoning from contact or ground water contamination. Even the child-miner issue is mostly moot. We don't actually need the output from those mines, it just happens to be cheaper at the moment. That is a fixable problem. At one point oil extraction from tar sand was seen as an impossible stupidly expensive thing to do.

      Just remember to take things in context. These powerwalls can be economical solutions in certain contexts. If you are not in such a context, then don't buy one.

    8. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by fedos · · Score: 2

      The roof shingles are for people willing to pay more to have solar panels deployed on their roof without making it look like they solar panel delpoyed on their roof. They're not meant to compete with roof-deployed solar panels on price.

    9. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      Batteries don't really have a negative impact on environment.
      They get recycled. The mining is simple.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      While I'm a big fan and super interested in the solar roof, I'm still waiting to see 4-5 years of data for a better cost/benefit analysis. On the face of it, the numbers do add up, but it's a brand new product, and I do expect that there will be some bugs to be shaken out.

      Given the weather and climate diversity in this country, I want to see how the roofs perform across a wide geographic area for a couple of years. How do they handle extreme events? What does maintenance really look like?

      I tend to distrust companies selling me a free lunch, and while I have some real faith that Musk can make it work, I'm not willing to totally buy into the numbers just yet.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    11. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the current version of solar roof shingles as equivalent to the Tesla Roadster.

      The first iteration of the product is treated more as a "boutique" item for customers with money to blow. If you're well off and want to be energy conscious, but find the aesthetics of normal solar panels to be garish and uncouth, you can spend a little extra to get these shingles. You can be fashionable and efficient.

      And that's fine for a first run. The sale price contains a pretty big markup, but the target audience is fine with that. The company can refine the process while still turning a profit, and eventually have a more mass-market option.

    12. Re:Nice PR move, but .... by Bengie · · Score: 1

      But battery technology really hasn't evolved at that fast of a pace

      An average increase in power density of 10% per year or 2.6x over the past decade.

      much of the gains we've seen in how long you can go before needing to recharge a laptop or a phone have more to do with CPUs and other components increasing their efficiency.

      Don't forget about everyone being obsessed with "slim". Cellphone is made 25% slimmer while having 25% more capacity in one generation. "QQ, batteries are not getting better fast enough, just look at my cell phone". My cellphone with a case is slimmer than my cellphone without a case from just a few years back, yet the battery storage has gone from 2AH to 3.5AH. Do you have an agenda against battery tech developing too slowly?

  5. 1 aircon unit = 300 bucks installed. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    thats thai pricing, roughtly. enough for a room.
    1000 gets you an office space/bigroom luxus model.

    basically those school systems pay off themselves in 30 years. I really have to think that tesla is starved for buyers for the powerwall. which is a stupid fucking name anyways. Tesla powerBANK would be a better one, since it would lead to less disappointment about what it actually is.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  6. perhaps send those that signed this to maths class by gravewax · · Score: 0

    sooo let me get this right, to save a few dollars on power, they spent a shitload on powerwalls that will never pay for themselves? or did Tesla give them a special deal so that they aren't economically unviable

  7. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    They don't have maths classes in Hawaii. They only teach one math.

  8. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by gravewax · · Score: 1

    sorry forgot they don't teach English in the US.

  9. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They somehow magically generate power which somehow magically cools kids in classrooms. You know, instead of just installing AC and paying for the power because kids are suffering in the heat.

    Tesla PR is spinning this hard.

  10. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    Not since we threw them all out.

  11. Since when has *PAMPERING* become a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > ... School happens primarily during the day. Heat is primarily a problem when the sun is shining brightest ...

    Since when has *pampering * become the perfect solution for anything?

    Classrooms in Singapore are much hotter but they are producing much better students than those from Hawaii

    1. Re:Since when has *PAMPERING* become a solution? by shilly · · Score: 1

      A source for this claim about Singaporean classroom temperatures? Because it would be very unlike the Singaporean government to not put AC in classrooms.

    2. Re:Since when has *PAMPERING* become a solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read this thread - https://forum.singaporeexpats.com/viewtopic.php?t=85614

      It was dated 2012, some six years ago, but the situation of Singaporean public primary schools and public secondary schools remain almost unchanged --- Public schools that are equipped with air conditions are almost always putting air-condition units for their libraries / main halls

      Classrooms are mostly equipped with ceiling fans

      If you want schools with classrooms all equipped with air-conditioners then you have to enroll your children into private (expensive) schools

      And the weird thing is that schools with best academic results in Singapore are public schools, instead of private schools

  12. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by hyades1 · · Score: 2

    Why would you care? Unless you've had a lot to say about fossil fuel subsidies totalling $5.3 trillion (more than 6% of the entire planet's GDP), you should probably just relax about a few bucks going to solar power, especially when it keeps getting cheaper and cheaper to install and use.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_subsidies

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  13. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by gravewax · · Score: 0

    it is just sad to see such wastage. Nothing wrong with solar, though better solutions are probably geo thermal in that region. Solar with net feed to the grid would be far better, Powerwalls suck balls cost wise, they are purely waste, they only have benefit where connectivity to the grid is expensive or the grid is inherently unreliable.

  14. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by hyades1 · · Score: 2

    TFA isn't clear, but a lot of the state doesn't really have a grid. It would be good to know how many of those walls will wind up in places like Kauai, where they still provide power to buildings by running diesel generators.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  15. Why batteries ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Panels on the roof and an A/C unit inside. Maybe with a relay to cut the A/C if the panels aren't producing enough.

    That would work, the kids are only there daytime and the A/C is only needed badly when the sun is shining.

    The batteries just seem an unnecessary expense in this case.

    1. Re:Why batteries ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panels on the roof and an A/C unit inside. Maybe with a relay to cut the A/C if the panels aren't producing enough.

      That would work, the kids are only there daytime and the A/C is only needed badly when the sun is shining.

      The batteries just seem an unnecessary expense in this case.

      Yeah, it's not like the kids need lights or computers or anything that runs on electricity besides the AC unit. A candle and a quill pen and ink is all they need! Next thing you know, they'll want motorized buses instead of horse-carriages to transport students!

      Spoiled brats! /s

    2. Re:Why batteries ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because the GP demanded they also cut their grid tie, so that it is ONLY solar running everything!

  16. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    You must have dropped out in 8th grade. I had to take at least 6 of them.

  17. And I though the US is a developed country... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    How come a country as highly developed and as rich as the USA doesn't even have A/C in schools in what is possibly one of the hottest parts of the country?
    And, as others pointed out, an electricity network that is not even able to provide the power for those A/C units?
    At maybe 10 kW per classroom (with halfway decent isolation that should be more than enough to cool it down) that's a mere 25 MW of electricity - spread out over the network.

    1. Re:And I though the US is a developed country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia is not.
      Parts of NSW and SA have classroom temps of 38 C. There is a politically generous campaign to roll out AC over the next 30 years.
      In the meantime 15yo literacy levels have dropped some 9% relative to rest of world.
      I assume nosebleed electricity rates means the family home is hotter. Certainly SE Asia is raising classroom levels. Now if only American presidents did not suffer from too hot classrooms (Bush, Trump).

    2. Re: And I though the US is a developed country... by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      in what is possibly one of the hottest parts of the country?

      I take it you've never been to Hawaii. FYI, it's generally very pleasant; tradewinds and all that.

    3. Re: And I though the US is a developed country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pleasant. But if you are fat, as Americans generally are, and Hawaiians especially, then that feels too damn hot.

    4. Re:And I though the US is a developed country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. All SA schools are aircond for the past 10 years.

    5. Re: And I though the US is a developed country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The four poorest towns in the USA are in Kentucky, Texas, Mississippi and Arizona.

    6. Re: And I though the US is a developed country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being "poor" != poverty. Nor does being "poor" == crime. Social breakdown and a culture of envy and dependency does that...

    7. Re:And I though the US is a developed country... by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Hawaii is in an awkward situation when it comes to power. They only have a population of 1.5 million, 2/3 of whom live on Oahu. That's borderline too small for a nuclear plant. Because it's a remote island, transport costs dominate the price of fuels, so coal ends up being more expensive than oil. Consequently, most of their electricity is generated by burning fuel oil.

      This leads to Hawaii having the highest electricity cost of any state, higher than even Alaska. It's what makes alternatives like wind and solar more popular there - their price is more competitive with fossil fuels.

      Because of the high price of electricity, you really have to pick and choose when you're going to use electricity. As others have mentioned, most of the state is actually very comfortable despite the heat. The winds are consistent and it's only certain windward sides of the islands where the humidity is high enough to make it uncomfortable. By the time the air has passed over the mountainous areas, the moisture has been squeezed out making it less humid and more comfortable. So you don't actually need to run air conditioners a lot of the time. It's not like the Indian subcontinent or East Asia, where the humidity is absolutely oppressive during the monsoon season and makes the outdoors feel like a sauna.

      The point of the Powerwalls is to allow wind-generated electricity at night to be stored for later use during the day. As has been pointed out, it's mostly a PR stunt since the cost of the Powerwalls would make this non-competitive versus even oil-generated electricity in any real cost comparison. But one hopes it will become cost competitive in the future.

    8. Re:And I though the US is a developed country... by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      When you account for cost of living Hawaii is actually the poorest state in the United States.

    9. Re:And I though the US is a developed country... by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      It's fairly sunny too. I think that as the U.S. goes, O'ahu makes a really good test case for the viability and sustainability of solar power. Lots of sun, alternatives are inherently expensive, population is fairly centralized (most is in Honolulu), and power needs are modest compared to more heavily industrialized regions of the U.S. Now, I believe that experiment is going to require several decades. But I do hope it succeeds. The supply of fossil fuels is (probably) limited, and burning them results in environmental damage. I'd rather save them for places where better alternatives don't exist yet.

    10. Re:And I though the US is a developed country... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      Actually, last time I priced electricity from a powerwall, it cost something like 0.08 UKP/kWh (about 12c/kWh) plus the cost of the electricity (solar panels in Hawaii might be as low as 5c/kWh depending mainly on the installation costs.) So it's fairly plausible they could hit 20c/kWh. Which although not fantastic is still pretty good compared to the 40c/kWh the grid costs you. But even that's only for the stored electricity; most of the electricity you could just generate and stick straight into the AC unit, so the overall cost will be between the two figures, probably nearer the solar panel cost.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  18. RTFA by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    If you did, u would see that a lot more is going on than just adding AC.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      https://apple.slashdot.org/com...

      Hurry Windbourne, tell this person how wrong he is !!

  19. Funny you should say that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had a similiar situation in California, but caused by Pete Wilson during his time as Governor, but triggered during Gray Davis' term (he was either incompetent or a pushover, but the fault really did lie with the previous administration.)

    The bigger problem is citizens tolerating this sort of collusion between the elected officials and the private sector to a degree where this is possible, followed by the ability for blame to be shifted between the parties as one bad law gets put in place under one administration, then only partially repealed under the next so they can continue playing 'Good Cop, Bad Cop' around issues that matter to better pad each other's own pockets. Because at the end of the day that is what American politics looks like, whether local, state, or federal level.

  20. Some like it not. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1, Funny

    Trump recommended Hawaii install all the Powerwalls in a row to make an actual wall, to keep out the Mexicans.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Some like it not. by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Sad!

  21. AC going to Hawaii! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's correct folks, I'm heading to Hawaii!
    It took Musk 300 PowerWalls to get me there, but that's just what I need to continue my trolling in the sun with a pina colada in my hands!

  22. Seems legit by thejeffwhite · · Score: 1

    I went to high school in Hawaii, and I don't understand how this could work without rebuilding the high schools themselves. Most (if not all) the schools are open-air campuses; there's no indoors except the classrooms themselves. The classrooms have no significant insulation (why would they?), and generally feature jalousie windows. How they intend to keep the cold air in is a mystery to me. The other thing to consider here is that it's not just the heat that's the problem. The "heat" itself is generally just fine, it's not like Las Vegas or Phoenix out there. It's the humidity that gets you, and you get acclimated to that after a few months. I'm sure I'm missing something but when I hear A/C in Hawaii schools I immediately imagine all that cold air seeping out the jalousies and the A/C units constantly overworking. Sounds like a massive waste.

  23. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kauai has a total population less than 70,000. how many classrooms can it possibly have?

  24. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    You think it's the only Hawaiian island?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  25. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The majority of Hawaii's population is centred around the 3 main islands. Oahu accounts for over 70% of the population, Maui and Hawai'i account for another 20%. All the other islands combined don't total more than 100k residents.

  26. Re:perhaps send those that signed this to maths cl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and those other NON main islands come to around 20k of people. The rest are all centred on the 3 main islands which surprise surprise have grid.

  27. The poor students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the past 60+ years they have been fine without AC. This is just another govt. spend exactly like Ohio did back in the 80s, more property tax and the students no longer needed to suffer like the rest of us had to. Actually, it wan't suffering, it was just a fact of life. More proof that humankind is becoming weaker by the day.