Slashdot Mirror


Apple Bans Iran from the App Store (bleepingcomputer.com)

Iranian users have not been able to access Apple's App Store all day today, in what appears to be a ban put in place by the US company. From a report: According to reports and sources who spoke with Bleeping Computer, the ban appears to have been put in place earlier today, around noon, GMT. Users were not able to connect to the Apple App Store to install or update applications. When visiting the App Store, they were instead greeted with the message "The App Store is unavailable in the country or region you're in." This ban appears to be IP-based. Meysam Firouzi -- an Iranian security researcher -- told Bleeping Computer that he successfully connected to the App Store while using a VPN, despite having Iran-related details set on his account.

58 comments

  1. Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just when I wanted to install Iran on my iphone.

    1. Re: Crap! by fortfive · · Score: 1

      You canâ(TM) Afford the in app purchases anyway.

    2. Re: Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should that be iRan?

  2. Not first post by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think this is kind of standard for businesses that have a stake in the United States. Tech companies I have worked for have restrictions from making sales to Iran or North Korea. Isn't there an embargo? It changes almost every year it seems.

    Question from me is, how did Apple EVER be able to make sales to Iran?

    --
    Take off every 'sig' !!
    1. Re:Not first post by n329619 · · Score: 1

      Question from me is, how did Apple EVER be able to make sales to Iran?

      1. Go to Ebay or whatever online store
      2. Buy iPhone and Ship to Iran / somewhere close to Iran
      3. Collect iPhone and Go back to Iran
      4. ????
      5. iPhone in Iran

    2. Re:Not first post by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Question from me is, how did Apple EVER be able to make sales to Iran?

      Under UN Security Council Resolution 2231 (20 July 2015) the sanctions on Iran were partially lifted. The US has its own sanctions which remained in place, but as a company registered as tax resident in Jersey, I guess Apple thought they could avoid that. But under the current US regime they are having second thoughts.

    3. Re:Not first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Apple EVER be able to make sales to Iran?

      Sanctions: Great for the pre-owned goods market and smugglers. The one advantage: Hollywood can't bitch about piracy.

    4. Re:Not first post by shahab78 · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Sanctions are against the government not the people. no where does it mention you can't sell goods to people from Iran, you couldn't do business with Iranian government, which by the way some of it was lifted in 2015 (Boeing selling airplanes to Iran is one example of US companies doing business with Iran). These are just voluntarily douchey moves by companies which usually happens when they are trying to score some points with the government for other purposes.

  3. Enough! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    youâ(TM)re

    Look, I don't like the idea of a website like Slashdot banning anyone, because for the most part the moderation system works and it's entertaining to see what people have to say. And that has nothing to do with the fact that my own incredibly high karma has made me the most beloved Slashdot commenter four years in a row.

    But for chrissake, can we please block anyone who posts shit that looks like this? I don't even want to know how come your apostrophes end up looking like your cat sat on your keyboard. Knock it the fuck off.

    youâ(TM)re

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Enough! by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I don't even want to know how come your apostrophes end up looking like your cat sat on your keyboard. Knock it the fuck off.

      youâ(TM)re

      I've found that when I post from my phone that's what comes up. Frustrating, but hardly the fault of the user.

    2. Re:Enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is with slashdot not with the poster.

    3. Re:Enough! by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      Seriously. Smartphones with full-up web browsers have been around over a decade. And unicode has been a thing for just HOW long now? I'd be embarrassed to be a Slashdot developer... or staffer of any kind... what with 1990s-esque deficiencies like this. It make me wonder, just where Slashdot spends its income. They're certainly not spending their money on writing, editorial, or operations staff. And I guess not on developers (or good developers anyway) either.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    4. Re:Enough! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The problem is with slashdot not with the poster.

      Then why am I able to post 'all ' the ' fucking ' apostrophes ' I want without making a mess of it?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Enough! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      I've found that when I post from my phone that's what comes up. Frustrating, but hardly the fault of the user.

      I disagree. If you're posting to Slashdot from your fucking telephone, you don't deserve to be here.

      If God meant for us to use Slashdot on a fucking telephone, He'd have created a fucking Slashdot app.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't even want to know how come your apostrophes end up looking like your cat sat on your keyboard. Knock it the fuck off.

      You know, you're kind of a new guy in these technical forums. And most are like you: "Spare me the details", "I don't even wanna know" and so on.

      Back in the '80s -- no, earlier, in the '70s -- you'd hardly find someone like you. Everyone was interested in everything. A site like Slashdot would be fixed in no time... not because of competence, but because people could not resist to find out what prevents special chars from appearing.

      But, alas, that is the way things are now.

      These days we ask things in curiosity and people start to send weird looks at us...

      Congrats on your +2 score here for not wanting to know.

    7. Re: Enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get off my lawn!

    8. Re:Enough! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      alas

      I love it when the ACs start to speak in poesy.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Enough! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Yes, for over a decade. Why is Apple unleashing this crap only in recent times?

    10. Re:Enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote that comment because... /. has turned into a shit stain of bad editing, so many ads that it's not readable without an ad blocker, 10 pages of spam in the firehose before you find a story to up vote, and the site is down more than up recently. Hire an I.T. staff that can do the job or you're fucking off your readers.

    11. Re:Enough! by sheramil · · Score: 1

      If 4chan can wordfilter any of the digits between 0 and 9 to "OVER 9000", then surely slashdot can wordfilter "â(TM)" to an apostrophe. it's not rocket science, people. it doesn't need hydrazine.

    12. Re:Enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. This not recent. It's been a problem here for years.
      2. It's not just Apple. It happens with many Android phones.
      3. It's neither Apple's not Google's fault. Go to just about any other site and you won't see this. The blame is purely with slashdot and janky AF codebase that they don't seem to want to be bothered to keep up to date.

    13. Re:Enough! by Goragoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What baffles me the most is the fact that we know that there is a unicode whitelist. I get that allowing all of unicode causes all sorts of issues, but why is it so hard to add the few smart quotes to the whitelist? That alone would solve most of the problems. If you then add like maybe 5-10 other common used unicode characters to the list and it would probably fix 99% of the remaining problems. Is it really that hard?

    14. Re:Enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing an apostrophe with a single quote character. They are not the same thing. Neither have they the same encoding, nor are they the same as various accent characters.

      Sigh. This used to be a technical site.

    15. Re: Enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you arenâ(TM)t using an iPad screen keyboard. Because the iPad (and presumably iPhone) have NO WAY TO TYPE NON-UNICODE QUOTES. The only possible way to get traditional ansi quote chars is to copy-paste them from other peopleâ(TM)s posts.

      The other extremely annoying part is that when I log in, it suppresses a vast majority of the comments, even though my user settings are set to show -1. So I have to browse logged out, and generally post anonymously because its too much of a hassle to go log in, manage to get back to the post I wanted to respond to, and then log out again so I can see the rest of the comments.

      And why could I possibly be so masochistic to want to browse slashdot in this degraded fashion? because my iPad weighs a fraction of what my laptop weighs and itâ(TM)s extremely convenient to consume all my news this way from the couch. ...aside from those few occasions when I want to post a comment.

    16. Re: Enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's the problem... The editors are holding it wrong.

    17. Re:Enough! by youngone · · Score: 1

      Sigh. This used to be a technical site.

      Ha ha, that's exactly what thought.
      Now explain to him why can can browse to slashdot.org and doesn't have to remember IP addresses.
      Subnets might be pushing it though.

    18. Re: Enough! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Clearly you arenâ(TM)t using an iPad screen keyboard.

      Clearly.

      because my iPad weighs a fraction of what my laptop weighs and itâ(TM)s extremely convenient to consume all my news this way

      Brother, don't debase yourself for convenience. Have some standards.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Enough! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You are confusing an apostrophe with a single quote character....Sigh. This used to be a technical site.

      And we used to roast pedants around here too.

      Sadly, standards are slipping.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:Enough! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      You are confusing an apostrophe with a single quote character....Sigh. This used to be a technical site.

      And we used to roast pedants around here too.

      Sadly, standards are slipping.

      That's ok. He was being pernickety. I'm being the pedant in this post.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    21. Re:Enough! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      That's ok. He was being pernickety. I'm being the pedant in this post.

      Yeah, but you do it with panache. Or is it grenache? It's one of those, I'm pretty sure.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    22. Re:Enough! by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Back in the '80s -- no, earlier, in the '70s -- you'd hardly find someone like you. Everyone was interested in everything.

      lol. No.

      Complete bollocks.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    23. Re:Enough! by houghi · · Score: 1

      In Perl? We are lucky that we are able to use the letter 'e'.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    24. Re:Enough! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      That's ok. He was being pernickety. I'm being the pedant in this post.

      Yeah, but you do it with panache. Or is it grenache? It's one of those, I'm pretty sure.

      Down int' these parts we call it cranberry juice.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  4. But but but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..isn't this RACIST?

  5. This demos danger of government and centralization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great example of why centralization is dangerous. Both governments and private entities have the power to undermine others. Nothing so critical such as communications and technology should be controlled by any entity, organization, or government. Such power is too great.

    I prefer technologies such as Zen Cash, Riot, MediaGoblin, Open Bizarre, Tor, MaidSafe, NameCoin, BitTorrent and similar technologies that put control of communications into the users hands.

    Nobody has any right to tell me what I can and can't do or say up to the extent that I'm within space of which I'm entitled to control. Safety is never a good excuse for totalitarianism.

  6. Canâ(TM)t block VPNs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If itâ(TM)s an IP block, then it seems like they canâ(TM)t block if someone just uses a VPN.

    IP based blocks will get even more useless with increasing IPV6 adoption. You wontâ(TM)t be able to easily block by IP any longer.

  7. They might ban iRan by tonywong · · Score: 3, Funny

    But they'll never ban iRack.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcjLEwZqcQI

  8. Hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tim Cook hacked by the Ruskies again?

  9. America First! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    But how about Iran before Iraq?

  10. That explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just trying to buy Iran on the App store and couldn't find it anywhere.

    1. Re:That explains it by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The iRan sneakers are now part of the iRack iproduct range.
      Buy the iRack shelf system and the iRan sneakers are included in the box.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. Re: Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get fucked

  12. Embargo by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    I am surprised Apple did business in Iran before. I thought there was an US embargo on Iran that prevented it.

    1. Re:Embargo by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      Nah, we have the latest and greatest even before average joe does in the US.
      It's just 10 to 20% more expensive most of the times.
      Some dev kits and stuff are more expensive though.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    2. Re:Embargo by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      We've got some pretty good ghormez sabzi in the states. The tech is awful though.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  13. toko parcel di jakarta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    toko parcel di jakarta
    http://tokoparcelanggrni16.blogspot.co.id/2018/03/toko-parcel-jakarta-jual-parcel-lebaran.html

  14. toko parcel di jakarta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    toko parcel di jakarta
    http://localparcelind.blogspot.co.id/2018/03/toko-parcel-jakarta-toko-parcel-jakarta_15.html

  15. I love meeting the enemy by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    People who our governments say are our enemy, Chinese, Iranians, Russians. You know... and you know what, they are just like us, BUT now we get to talk to them... and maybe even make a friend or 2.... :)

    --
    [($)]
    1. Re:I love meeting the enemy by stooo · · Score: 1

      yeah, but it seems you won't be able to talk to them via your eyephone.
      Take a samsung instead.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  16. Samasung by stooo · · Score: 1

    Buy Samsung

    --
    aaaaaaa
  17. Refunds please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay to have my app in their worldwide store. I could be losing money because of this.

    In my case, not much money, but some people may lose a significant amount.

  18. Re: Obligatory: Intel CPU Backdoor Report (Jan 1 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TL;DR. Nobody cares. Fuck off. Et cetera.

  19. Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has repeatedly banned apps from the app store that were made in Iran, it's due to US sanctions against Iran which Obama toughened while in office. Since Apple has yet to say anything it could also be the Iranian government blocking the app store in an effort to further restrict their people's freedom.

  20. Looks Like Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the only one to make walls.

  21. Vigilance Should Be Sharpened against Imperialist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mar. 17, Juche 107 (2018) Saturday

    Vigilance Should Be Sharpened against Imperialists' Moves for
    Expanding Sphere of Domination

    The imperialists are perpetrating open interference in the internal affairs of other countries and aggression on them under the deceptive slogans "peace" and "ensuring security" in a bid to achieve their hegemonic purpose.

    The world progressives and countries aspiring after independence have to see through the hegemonic moves of the imperialists veiled with falsehood and deception and counter them with vigilance.

    The "peace" much touted by the imperialists precisely means the slogan for aggression for expanding the sphere of domination.

    They are finding their way out of ruin in escalating the invasion of other countries and the meddling in their internal affairs.

    It is proven by the present reality that sovereignty of countries and nations is violated and there are ceaseless wars and disputes in different countries due to the aggression and interference by the imperialist and hegemonic forces.

    The moves to maintain and expand the sphere of domination by the U.S.-led imperialists are doomed to fail as they are outdated and reactionary ones going against the trend of the times toward independence.

    The arbitrary practices and blusters of the imperialists rampant in the international arena are nothing but the last-ditch efforts of the doomed reactionaries of history.

    No challenge of the imperialists can ever stop mankind from building an independent world.

    Ri Hyo Jin