Slashdot Mirror


Once Written Off for Dead, the Aral Sea Is Now Full of Life (nationalgeographic.com)

Years ago, the Aral Sea was the world's fourth-largest freshwater lake with an area of some 26,000 square miles. But in the 1950s, it became the victim of the Soviet Union's agricultural policies. Water from its two river sources -- the Amu Darya and Syr Darya -- was intentionally diverted for cotton cultivation. The Aral Sea began to disappear and nearly completely vanished. But things have changed for good. From a report: This rapid collapse over less than three decades -- which environmental scientists say is one of the planet's worst ecological disasters -- is marked today by the sea's reduced size. Its total area of water, straddling Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, is now a tenth of its original size. What's left has broken into two distinct bodies: the North and South Aral Seas. In Uzbekistan, the entire eastern basin of the South Aral Sea is completely desiccated, leaving merely a single strip of water in the west.

But Kazakhstan's North Aral Sea has seen a happier outcome, thanks to a nearly $86 million project financed in large part by the World Bank. Along with repairs to existing dikes around the basin to prevent spillage, an eight-mile dam was constructed just south of the Syr Darya River. Completed in the summer of 2005, this dam, named Kokaral, surpassed all expectations. It led to an 11-foot increase in water levels after just seven months -- a goal that scientists initially expected would take three years. This turnaround in the North Aral Sea's fate has meant that the fish stocks have returned to its waters, injecting new life into the local communities. Just as government policies had doomed the Aral Sea, careful planning and research helped revive at least part of it.

50 comments

  1. Downsizing works by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    ...sometimes.

    1. Re: Downsizing works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's downsize Congress. Half of them are worse than useless.

      Heck, let's just have a single God-Emperor.

  2. Re:something else full of life by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    It's the Aral sea, not the Oral sea. :-p

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  3. God-Emperor by gDLL · · Score: 1, Funny

    Putin says hi!

  4. One Aral, not the Aral by Troed · · Score: 4, Informative

    “It is helping to save the Small Aral sea,” says FitzGerald. “But it was also a death warrant to the Big Aral, on the Uzbek side. People on the Uzbek side are very angry about it. The dam shut the only source of water that was entering their sea.”

    http://www.bbc.com/news/resour...

    1. Re:One Aral, not the Aral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      top lel

    2. Re:One Aral, not the Aral by DRJlaw · · Score: 5, Informative

      âoeIt is helping to save the Small Aral sea,â says FitzGerald. âoeBut it was also a death warrant to the Big Aral, on the Uzbek side. People on the Uzbek side are very angry about it. The dam shut the only source of water that was entering their sea."

      So, similar to the Uzbeks, you simply chose to ignore the next paragraph, which inconveniently notes that:

      "That ignores, however, the fact that the Amu Darya - known to Central Asian schoolchildren as the Amazon of the region - was diverted into myriad irrigation channels supplying Uzbekistanâ(TM)s own cotton and rice fields."

      It's was the only remaining source of water because the Uzbeks completely diverted their own source of water. But that paints a far less sympathetic picture.

    3. Re:One Aral, not the Aral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, they're now exploring for oil in the dry lake-bed.
      So they're not really interested in doing anything to restore the lake.

    4. Re: One Aral, not the Aral by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If they are lucky the Uzbekistan side will begin to fill anyway. To me, it's amazing how fast life revives once it's been given a space to live.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:One Aral, not the Aral by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      To which the response is Kazakhstan is a lot bigger and has lots of uranium (both the US and Russia want to be friends with them), what can you say, sucks to be Uzbek. It is not a very big dam and well below original water levels, so maybe it will eventually overflow, better some hope than none.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:One Aral, not the Aral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Uzbekistan has a US controlled Novichok nerve agent facility, so the US are still happy !

  5. Re:something else full of life by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    The Aral sea hasn't dried and withered away completely yet.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  6. World Bank please.... by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Also save Owens Lake in California! (see http://mentalfloss.com/article...)

    1. Re: World Bank please.... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen. The Los Angeles water board is too powerful and they oppose it. The problem is not the money, it's the people.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  7. The collapse of the USSR by p51d007 · · Score: 0, Troll

    They kept sucking water out of it faster than it went back in. Once the stupid USSR collapsed, and these nations were allowed to control their own land, it started to recover. Once again, showing how communism and socialism are total LOSERS.

    1. Re:The collapse of the USSR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the anti-russia libtard.

    2. Re:The collapse of the USSR by Memnos · · Score: 1

      Found some tribalist partisan imbecile's lost pet parrot.

      --
      I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
    3. Re:The collapse of the USSR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put down the mirror, dipshit.

    4. Re: The collapse of the USSR by peppepz · · Score: 1

      The World Bank lends money in exchange for letting your country's resources be exploited by capitalists. I don't know if "taking back control" is the most appropriate expression here. Also, the Uzbek seem pretty content with the water diversion operated by the Soviets. I don't know how free they are to express themselves, though. I smell there's some politics at play here.

    5. Re:The collapse of the USSR by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      Why are you so stupid?

      What has communism/socialism to do with a totalitorian regime forcing the destruction of a river for cotton plantages?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:The collapse of the USSR by dunkelfalke · · Score: 3

      Who the fuck modded that crap informative?
      The recovery - which is not that impressive - has nothing to do with the nations being allowed to control their own land. Once the USSR collapsed, the economy in both Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan dwindled and so did the population - of Kazakhstan at least (Usbekistan had a little dirty civil war instead). That is the only reason for the recovery.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re:The collapse of the USSR by stud9920 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly, what Nestlé is doing to water supply worldwide could only happen in dirty commie shitholes

    8. Re:The collapse of the USSR by BlackPignouf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, the much more intelligent capitalists would never build huge cities with golf clubs, water shows and huge swimming pools in the frickin' desert, right?

    9. Re:The collapse of the USSR by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Found Ivan.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    10. Re:The collapse of the USSR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, showing how communism and socialism are total LOSERS.

      What about Owens Lake in California? But I'm sure that you'll reply that California is communist too.

      They kept sucking water out of it faster than it went back in.

      The situation is more complicated than that. Intesive agriculture polluted the Aral waters with herbicides, that in turn accelerated the desertification of the area. So we get to next point:

      Once the stupid USSR collapsed, and these nations were allowed to control their own land, it started to recover.

      Nope, as the article says, the Uzbek part is in dire conditions. It was the end of the intensive agriculture that allowed its recover.

    11. Re:The collapse of the USSR by jabuzz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except looking at the Wikipedia page shows that in 1989 right before comunisim collapsed the Aral Sea was mostly intact but by 2014 it had mostly dried up.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      So while Soviet era policies are the problem it didn't actually dry up during the existence of the USSR. In addition the Wikipedia page says it has been shrinking since at *LEAST* 1850

      Though further reading of the article reveals that the irrigation channels leak like the buggery wasting anywhere between 30% and 75% of the water being used for irrigation. So perhaps all that is needed is to bring the irrigation channels up to scratch and the irrigation can continue and the sea will refill at least partially.

      Reading a bit further shrinkage in the 1990's was basically all down to the Uzbek leader. Fortunately that particular despot died 18 months ago, and things tentatively look to be improving.

      Finally the Soviets expected the sea to disappear.

    12. Re:The collapse of the USSR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the old days, when conservatives talked about killing Russians, instead of all trying to suck Putin's dick.

    13. Re:The collapse of the USSR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like, say, Oregon and California?

  8. Re:Just like global warming... by bug_hunter · · Score: 0

    From TFA

    > For them the disappearance of the sea is a disaster. The revival of the Small Aral brings hope to some, but it was only ever 5% of the whole. The Western basin accounts for another 5%.
    > Ninety per cent of the sea has gone.
    > It’s one of the world’s most startling ecological calamities - the story of how cotton soaked up an entire sea.

    But feel free to add "40 years of man made interference destroyed 90% of a sea" to the list of reasons why climate change is wrong.

    --
    It's turtles all the way down.
  9. We only have one solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Union, dam it!

  10. Thank you comrade Stalin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you comrade Stalin for a happy childhood and for filling our rivers, oceans and lakes. And for making the cows give milk.

  11. The Left in charge of the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ;)

  12. Re:Just like global warming... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The losses of the Aral sea have noting to do with "climate change".

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  13. NOT a freshwater lake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to correct the mistake

  14. Re:Just like global warming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    logic doesn't apply for climate change deniers.

  15. Check your facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aral Sea was never fresh water, unless "fresh" means "salt".
    Stopped reading right after "fresh water"

    1. Re:Check your facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, everything died in the Aral Sea when the salinity shot up higher than the Dead Sea's. Wouldn't have happened if it were fresh water. What journalist can't even do 30 seconds of research?

  16. Re:Trump's Presidency is written off for dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest you seek counseling for your Trump derangement syndrome. Your need to post off topic rants about the President on every thread indicates a lurking anger that needs a more healthy outlet. Otherwise when he wins re-election in 2020 you are either going to suffer an aneurysm or snap and go on a shooting spree.

    Please get help. You don't have to like the President, but your obsession with hating him is not healthy.

  17. Intelligent capitalist pigs.... by gDLL · · Score: 0

    The capitalists might have gone piggy building swimming pools in the desert, but they could afford it....unlike our socialist comrades....

  18. Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks to global warming the ice caps are melting which will cause sea levels to rise making the Aral Sea larger than it has been for at least a few thousand years. That's what the Democrats keep saying is going to happen, right?

  19. Never react to anything by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    "careful planning and research"
    This SHOULD be a lesson to everyone insisting that the government "do something". Reactionary legislation is usually bad legislation that takes years to undo. The other lesson people should learn is that those who insist that the government "do something right away" are lying their ass off.

  20. Re:Trump's Presidency is written off for dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell comrade, pot/kettle syndrome. The fascist right had unwarranted shit fit festival for all of Obama's term, Leftists have actual reasons to want to see trump in a stockade, never has a president made the "swamp" so much more vile than he found it (look at the firings, plea bargains/convictions in the first term and change).

    Here's your 50 kopeyka, thanks for the troll/fake news

  21. When The Patient is Dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You amputate the gangrenous leg. You don't say, "but that will leave the patient with just one leg, which is unacceptable! We must either save the whole patient, with both legs, or the patient dies."

    The Aral Sea was dying, now something effective has been accomplished to save at least part of it. If the Uzbeks want to climb on board and initiate something to rescue their part of the Aral, there is at least something to climb on board to.

    Kazakhstan has literally the first positive, effective action on the Aral Sea in decades. Let the Uzbeks be angry. Their 'plan' was to continue as before, with the certain outcome of extinction for the entire Aral. I get that their portion of the Aral died faster this way but it was dying anyway. Time to get real, the Aral was doomed as things stood, and the Uzbeks are arguing over the manner and timing of it's death.

    This is both practical and symbolic. Up until now the Aral has been a symbol of failure, which discourages action on the matter. Now there is some success to point to, which encourages more steps. At least some of those next steps are up to the Uzbeks.

  22. Pay no attention to geoengineering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, the people who underreport their power plant capacity and then use the excess energy to evaporate fresh water to cause all your weather storms. Those are the ones you are really fighting against.

  23. Re:Just like global warming... by bug_hunter · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I was a little obscure in my description.
    Was just responding to the AC who seemed to claim that the planet is 100% capable of repairing itself from any man made thing done to it before anything bad happens.

    Didn't mean to imply that the sea went missing due to climate change.

    --
    It's turtles all the way down.
  24. Re:Just like global warming... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Ah, my fault perhaps. Probably I did not read correctly :D

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.