Slashdot Mirror


Google Bans Chrome Extensions That Mine Cryptocurrencies From the Web Store (bleepingcomputer.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Google announced that effective today, the Chrome Web Store review staff would stop accepting new extensions on the Web Store that perform cryptocurrency mining. Existing Chrome extensions that perform cryptocurrency mining will be delisted sometime in late June. The decision came after Google saw a rise in extensions that performed hidden in-browser mining (cryptojacking) behind the users' backs, in background processes.

Even if Google has not said it outright, the company has taken this step to protect Chrome's image. Cryptojacking scripts have a huge impact on a computer's responsiveness, and when most users investigate, they see Chrome's processes hogging CPU resources. Very few of these users will be able to track the spike in CPU usage back to an extension. Google has worked incredibly hard to create the image that Chrome is today's fastest browser, and the company isn't going to stand by and watch some extension developers ruin Chrome's brand so that some devs can make a few Monero on the side.

49 comments

  1. Gasp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And tens of thousands of gasps of dismay emenated from Ukrania....

    1. Re:Gasp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      semenated? wtf-ated?

  2. I'd like to see a list of those extensions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure some names on the list would surprise us.

    1. Re:I'd like to see a list of those extensions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I'm more interested what they're doing with the extensions that mine cryptocurrency from outside the Web Store. According to the headline this ban only affects extensions that mine cryptocurrency from the Web Store.

  3. Ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Google also kill extensions which show ads?

    1. Re:Ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only when it's not a Google ad.

    2. Re:Ads? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Approved ads get nice encryption from your brand to all the users.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  4. Who knew? by suman28 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had no idea you could mine Cryptocurrencies from the Web Store.
    You learn something new everyday!

    1. Re: Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly do they mine crypto dollars from the store? And who cares if they do? It's not like they are mining from your computer. Google just doesn't want people to profit from their huge ... data .. center.

      Right.

      Imagine that.

    2. Re: Who knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh...no, these apps have a mickey in them which uses your CPU (making your device run hot and slow, while draining your battery) to "mine" this bullshit (yes, that is what crypto-currency is, just more fiat bullshit like the dollar, except you can hold a dollar bill). You get *ZERO* benefit from it,
      plus you may be helping to support a system used mostly for all kinds of criminal activity.

      I will laugh when I see some of these crypto-criminals wind up in PMITA prison. They better make sure they keep a death grip on that soap bar!

  5. Cryptoscams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really good innovation, why they attract so many criminals/criminal activity?
    Could it really be because, all cryptocurrencies themselves are scams, and that is why they attract all kinds of criminals/criminal activity?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?
    Because the price of Bitcoin proved to be extremely unstable to use as a currency?
    Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
    Aren't all work the same way?

    Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
    But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
    What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

    Or, all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually just a modified (made decentralized and paying variable interest) Ponzi Schemes?
    (Price of cryptocurrencies would keep increasing in the long term (by their design), so it is equivalent of paying variable interest to all long term investors.)

    As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere!
    All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

    1. Re:Cryptoscams by barakn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your summary is a type of logical fallacy known as ad hominem.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    2. Re:Cryptoscams by jwymanm · · Score: 1

      This is a bot that keeps posting this.

    3. Re:Cryptoscams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not wrong though

    4. Re: Cryptoscams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A broken clock is still right twice a day.

    5. Re:Cryptoscams by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      and poisoning the well.

    6. Re:Cryptoscams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere!
      All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!"

      It's too late. You already lost control. Have fun crying.

    7. Re:Cryptoscams by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Ad Who???
      He's a bloody AC hiding behind a shred of anonymity to spread bullshit on the web.
      It's amazing how Shashdot, otherwise known as a place where smart people gather, groans under the weight of cryptocurrency-related ignorance.
      And yes, I am tired of endlessly trying to debunk all those retarded "myths" that are flung around like feces thrown by monkeys. Cryptocurrency bashing looks more and more like a fucking religion: a bucketful of nonsense repeated all over again.

      Here's why what he's saying is insane:

      (about cryptocurencies) "why they attract so many criminals/criminal activity?"

      Because they allow value to be easily transferred from one place to another, offer some anonymity, are easy to carry around and don't take room, to name a few reasons. They're a very good alternative to cash. It doesn't mean they're a bad innovation, quite the contrary. It also means they're misused, but not everything that's misused is a bad idea, see gunpowder and dynamite.

      "Could it really be because, all cryptocurrencies themselves are scams, and that is why they attract all kinds of criminals/criminal activity?"

      No, that's ridiculous.
      1. Generally, saying "ALL this is that" is stupid. Dealing with absolutes is generally stupid.
      2. Many well established cryptocurrencies are not scams. At the same time, most newer (2017 and beyond) cryptcurrencies are indeed created with the sole purpose of extracting money out of stupid people's pockets for as long as possible, much like most of whatever's being produced and sold worldwide, from newest flagship phones to risky loans and credit cards. Now, if those scammy ICOs are illegal, we (theoretically) have police and it should deal with that. If they're legal, then all i can say to the dummies who spent money on them is "oops".

      "If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?"

      False statement. Just look at coinmap.org - it's full of companies accepting Bitcoin. Also, it looks like for most people cryptomarket = bitcoin - also false.

      "Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
      Aren't all work the same way?"

      No, they're not. And while we're at it, look at HOW is the AC writing. The word structure is consistent with Slavic languages, with which I am familiar. Anyways, there's a wide variety of cryptocurrency infrastructures. Some offer full anonymity through either obfuscation (Monero) or coin mixing (VIVO), others reward coin ownership through the ability to run masternodes (VIVO), others are aimed at very fast transfers (Dash), others have the capability of acting as exchange medium (Vertcoin) or offer effortless mining without extra energy consumption (Unitus), or multi-algorithm mining (Myriad).
      So another false statement.

      Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
      But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
      What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

      (note the word structure, "they are not" instead of "are they not")
      Some are virtual investments, of course. In finance, they're called futures IIRC.
      Why do we want them? Because it's a type of technology which offers an alternative to "classic" value transfer methods, such as cash and bank-supported value transfers.
      And nothing would happen to the world economy if people would start investing in virtual coins.

      The rest is the same idiotic blabbering, ending with a big bang:

      All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

      So does Putin, but at least there are plenty worrisome reasons to ban Putin.
      Also, "too late" for what exactly?

      Yeah... again I wrote a wall of text which is like a drop in an ocean full of ignorance. That's why I gave up and just resort to labeling posts like the OP's as "ramblings of a madman". Saves me time and energy.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re:Cryptoscams by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      So, how much will you be losing when the crypto fantasy dies, hmm?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:Cryptoscams by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Nothing, really. I entered late and my cryptocurrency assets are now valued at around 200 dollars, highest value was around 500 dollars, all mined with my preexisting GPUs, none bought with cash. If they dip to zero it won't make me any poorer. Same if their value increases tenfold.
      It's more of a hobby, really, and I am interested in this type of technology. Yes, it's in its infancy and it does have many flaws currently, however this applied to literally everything new in the past.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    10. Re:Cryptoscams by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Interesting to see your thought process there. You're stupid, but it's interesting to see it. Nice JACQing off there, pard.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    11. Re:Cryptoscams by Maritz · · Score: 1

      If someone's argument is rambling, vague, and composed entirely of questions, it's not ad-hominem to dismiss it. Standards.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  6. Do I believe them? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    How would I know they did this? Unless the extensions are open source I have no idea what they are doing. Google should be requiring open source.

    1. Re:Do I believe them? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      They're all Javascript, IIRC.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  7. "Chrome fastest browser" by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not anymore, Firefox is faster now.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:"Chrome fastest browser" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In something other than a synthetic benchmark?

    2. Re:"Chrome fastest browser" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they only got that by removing all the features that made firefox good.

      yay... they "won".

  8. Firefox is only fastest for SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:Firefox is only fastest for SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      n/t = no thought. Whatsoever.

  9. Mine got pulled off too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting. Few days ago my extension got pulled of without explanation. I freaked out, didn't know why, because it was only RSS reader. I had few ideas why it could be so I start fixing them. I mentioned in summary that it is replacement of google reader, which they might not like, so I removed that. It was also using google caja sanitizer, so I replaced it with something else. Then there was preset of feeds so I removed them all. I was about to resubmit it next day when they sent me an email that it was removed by accident. They didn't tell why.

    Now that I see they are removing cryptocurrency miners it all makes sense. I use SHA1 sum to make GUID of article if it is not present or if it is too long, so that must have triggered their system to mark my RSS reader as crypto miner.

    1. Re:Mine got pulled off too by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

      That was a legitimately interesting story.

      --
      Just another second banana
    2. Re:Mine got pulled off too by Maritz · · Score: 1

      So they said "Sorry, we removed this by accident."

      And your response to them was... "Why?"?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  10. Re: If they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bye Felicia.

  11. Make Greed Great Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your greed conflicts with our greed, so we won't allow yours on ours anymore.

  12. So is Tampermonkey banned? by kristofer.vesi · · Score: 1

    Because some scripts like Iridium kindly ask for your donation trough mining. (That's the most right way, that it could be used)

  13. Huh? by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Google Bans Chrome Extensions That Mine Cryptocurrencies From the Web Store

    Why are cryptocurrencies even in the web store?!? Maybe the tool is doing everyone a favour?

  14. Browsers are poorly design or at least vulnerable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a browser allows a tab to consume all the systems resources its a poorly designed browser. The same goes for an operating system that allows a program to consume all available resources. A better designed system would inform the user of the possibility of excess resource usage and give the user the option to limit that tab/application's resource usage. This could get hairy with lots of applications causing alerts to confused users so the rational solution is sane defaults that limit resource usage and then enable a particular application or tab to request additional resources. For those capable an easy to utilize sliding scale would be available to manually select resource allocation.

  15. Why? by Gonoff · · Score: 2

    Why have large corporations, central banks and other rich people united behind their opposition to cryptocurrencies?

    It's almost as if they are protecting us peasants from making, or even having, a tiny amount of money outside their control!

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  16. Re:That's because Google is a LUDDITE company! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your boring meme must be about ten years old now. Fucking hell. Get a life.

  17. Re:If they... by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Must be really frustrating not having your cpu cycles taken to make money for a stranger.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  18. Google Chrome scans whole computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why than Google is not concerned about chrome performance?

    https://yro.slashdot.org/story/18/04/02/2041254/chrome-is-scanning-files-on-your-computer-and-people-are-freaking-out

  19. Crypto-currency bookworms.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....can't wait until all of this crypto-crap crashes spectacularly, and the little wieners wake up to reality and suddenly realise that they better memorize the line "so you want fries like that?"

    The shitshow of these douchebags crying and fawning, and running back to mommy and daddy because they can no longer afford that expensive lift will be truly epic!

  20. Crypto-currency bookworms pissing in their pantalo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....can't wait until all of this crypto-crap crashes spectacularly, and the little wieners wake up to reality and suddenly realise that they better memorize the line "do you want fries like that?"

    The shitshow of these douchebags crying and fawning, and running back to mommy and daddy because they can no longer afford that expensive loft will be truly epic!

  21. Huh! I'm about to start by IanScriven · · Score: 1

    was thinking about this yesterday but not doing it. afraid of hacks to my chrome