Slashdot Mirror


MPAA Silently Shut Down Its Legal Movies Search Engine (techdirt.com)

Back in 2015, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) released its own search engine to combat the argument that people pirate films because there are too few legal alternatives. According to TorrentFreak, the search engine, WhereToWatch.com, has since been quietly shut down by the movie industry group, stating that there are plenty of other search options available today. From the report: The MPAA pulled the plug on the service a few months ago. And where the mainstream media covered its launch in detail, the shutdown received zero mentions. So why did the site fold? According to MPAA Vice President of Corporate Communications, Chris Ortman, it was no longer needed as there are many similar search engines out there. "Given the many search options commercially available today, which can be found on the MPAA website, WheretoWatch.com was discontinued at the conclusion of 2017," Ortman informs TF. "There are more than 140 lawful online platforms in the United States for accessing film and television content, and more than 460 around the world," he adds. "That is all absolutely true today, though it was also true three years ago when the site was launched," adds Techdirt. "The simple fact of the matter is that the site did little to serve any real public customer base. Yes, legal alternatives to piracy exist. Everyone knows that, just as they know that there are far too many hoops and restrictions around which to jump that have nothing to do with price. The MPAA and its client organizations have long asserted strict control over their product to the contrary of public demand. That is, and has always been, the problem. On top of all that, the MPAA showed its no better at promoting its site than it was at promoting the legal alternatives to pirating movies."

63 comments

  1. r.i.p. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Matthew Mellon - Wikipedia
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Mellon
    Matthew Taylor Mellon, II (January 28, 1964) is the Chairman of the New York Republican Party’s Finance Committee. He was named Finance Chairman by State ...

    cease fire stand down.. that's the spirit...

    1. Re:r.i.p. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many of those "lawful platform" offer DRM-free video? Round about NONE of them?

      I don't rent things, I buy things. If pay for a video, I want it in my possession with no restrictions upon how I use it for personal entertainment. If the MPAA is unwilling to play fairly, then I'll keep sailing the seven seas.

    2. Re:r.i.p. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      So when you pay to rent a DVD, you want it in your possession too?
      When you pay to watch a movie in the theatre, you want it in your possession too?

      There's this thing called "renting", you might want to look it up.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:r.i.p. by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      I think you could just read before replying. From OP : "I don't rent things, I buy things."

    4. Re:r.i.p. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just an excuse for pirating movies.

    5. Re:r.i.p. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, what? In your opinion, wanting to buy things instead of renting them is an excuse for piracy?

      Sorry, but no. You are attempting to fabricate your own reasoning because you don't understand the statement.

    6. Re:r.i.p. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      He may hate DRM but nothing prevents him from buying movies and TV shows on DVD, Blu-ray or downloads. What he wants is unencrypted files and nobody in the industry is going to sell it that way.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re:r.i.p. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM-free or they don't get my money. Simple as that. If I pay for something, I expect to be able to use it where and when I want.

  2. It was pointless by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of these legal outlets were pointless. You either had to sign up to some ridiculous streaming service that didn't work with your smart TV anyway, or you pad to pay full retail price for a digital rental that also wouldn't play on your smart TV.

    The physical disc was usually cheaper, but also quite awkward thanks to DRM.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:It was pointless by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This. I have some bought legit copies of some movies that I particularly like, and guess what: It's a pain in the ass to get them to watch on the computer (I do not have a dedicated Blu-ray player, for various reasons). It's much simpler and easier to watch the "generic" copy.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    2. Re:It was pointless by atrex · · Score: 1

      Fortunately there are programs out there that make playing a blu-ray on a PC a hassle free experience. Unfortunately it's an additional investment of money that shouldn't be necessary and will probably remain a gray area in danger of vanishing someday if agencies like the MPAA get their way.

    3. Re:It was pointless by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      If it worked as described, it would have been nice to know about it when it existed. I frequently find myself saying "I'd like to watch X, is it on Netflix, Hulu, or Amazon Prime?" and having to search each site independently. If I try Google, it never gives me useful information. If I try websites that supposedly search these sites for you, the information is almost always wrong or incomplete, apparently based upon some snapshot of who streamed what in 1997.

      So, what went wrong? Was the site as bad as everyone else's? Did it not include the major unlimited streaming services? And why did they not do even the slightest amount of SEO?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:It was pointless by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty weak. Excuse. Buy a cheap streamer and you're done.

      Don't be coy. You just don't want to pay. It doesn't matter how easy it is.

      Disks are easy to rip even under Linux. Blurays are minor annoyances. DVDs are ridiculously trivial.

      You just don't want to bother because that would mean parting with money.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:It was pointless by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It was never supposed to be a sensible search engine. It was supposed to be a tool they could point to in their next lawsuit to pretend that legal sources don't change the behaviour or people.

      Unfortunately for them the other, real, legal sources proved pretty much this.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:It was pointless by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      When I part with money, it's on my terms, at least with a product that I can do without.

      You want my money. So earn it by offering me something I want to buy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:It was pointless by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      When I buy CDs and very occasionally DVD/BluRay discs I also download a rip. No point getting out the USB optical drive and wasting energy on ripping/encoding, scanning artwork etc. Other people have already done and checked their work for me.

      But yeah, other times there is no good option to buy or stream legitimately so I just pirate it. Life is too short.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:It was pointless by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Typically you went to the site, typed in what you wanted and it would tell you something like:

      - Not available in your region
      - Buy a Sky subscription and an add-on package (£30/month, minimum 1 year commitment, requires satellite dish and receiver)
      - Available on a streaming service that isn't compatible with your TV
      - Buy it on DVD for 5x the maximum amount you are willing to pay, in 9 months when we release it in your region

      Usually you were better off just going to Amazon or Rakuten and buying the DVD for a fraction of retail price, and after that most people never went back. Their SEO efforts paled in comparison to the big retailers anyway.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:It was pointless by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      So is the complaint that it was broken (ie it didn't show that a film was available on Netflix that was), or just that the search results didn't match the streaming services available to you?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:It was pointless by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I still have an optical drive and I intend to for the foreseeable future. I still have old games that I want to play every once in a while.

      Do you not do this or have you already created images of everything?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    11. Re:It was pointless by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      Saying the Pontiac Aztek is a shitty car is just a smokescreen. They're as easy to drive as anything else. You just don't want to pay for one.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    12. Re:It was pointless by unrtst · · Score: 1

      This is EXACTLY what I was hoping to ask/say here!

      The MPAA is in a perfect position to know all the players that have licensed the content. It should be a simple DB lookup, and maybe they could include some valuable info that's almost impossible to find elsewhere - the time periods when the license will be active (so I can see if something is about to be pulled from netflix, for example).

      At the very least, it sounds like a very good idea for a legit and very useful site. All the ones I've ever run into point to a lot of shady sites with lots of broken links and incomplete info. The streaming devices usually include some way to search across channels, but, IME, that doesn't work well at all, and it doesn't include channels and mediums that aren't available on that device. I'd love a non-biased site that identified all legit channels to obtain each movie (even if that catalog is just MPAA flicks).

    13. Re:It was pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I want to watch a Blu-Ray on my PC, I have to install extra proprietary software just to do it. You can't just fire them up in VLC.

      The same thing with ripping them, plus you have to deal with bullshit like Cinavia that prevents you from watching your rips on your device of choice.

    14. Re:It was pointless by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Saying the Pontiac Aztek is a shitty car is just a smokescreen. They're as easy to drive as anything else. You just don't want to pay for one.

      I'd say that since GM VPs took pains to avoid being even seen near one indicates that most didn't even want to stand next to one.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    15. Re:It was pointless by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I frequently find myself saying "I'd like to watch X, is it on Netflix, Hulu, or Amazon Prime?" and having to search each site independently.

      I've read that the fourth-generation Apple TV can do this.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    16. Re:It was pointless by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Something like http://www.canistream.it/

    17. Re:It was pointless by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I still have an optical drive. It lives in a drawer and never gets used. But even so, why bother wasting time ripping, checking, downloading artwork and metadata etc. when someone has already done it?

      I guess I could buy a digital copy instead of a physical one and get that stuff, but the digital copy is usually the same price and you get less for your money.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:It was pointless by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It didn't know about all streaming services and didn't seem to keep up with Netflix's monthly changes. While it did tailor results to your region, the results were often useless anyway.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:It was pointless by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      I've read that the fourth-generation Apple TV can do this.

      It does. I have one. If I search using siri or global search (it CANNOT be the app's own search!) then the ATV will find any and all versions of what you're looking for, and give a choice of apps to open with.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    20. Re: It was pointless by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      So you pay $300 a month for every single streaming service and pay extra for movies that are just not available?

      The MPAA exists to extract cash from people. They don't care about providing a service.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    21. Re:It was pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It doesn't matter how easy it is.
      Laughably wrong in the hypothetical stage.

      Proven hard wrong in a pile of data showing ease -> revenue time and again.

      Your bullshit is so amazingly wrong, you're wrong for several fields beyond movies that saw players grow because they simplified the consumer's rodeo.

      You probably meant your remark in the context of a discussion about "lol it's ezpz l2technology skiddyfag". It's pretty normal these days to be completely self-interested I guess, blind to the big picture. The discussion isn't about the capabilities of you, me, or the average /. user.

      While GP gets regular eyerolls from me, an accusation of the distribution meta being cumbersome is a really easy hill to defend.

    22. Re: It was pointless by tepples · · Score: 1

      Subscribe to one streaming service for one month, binge watch all interesting works exclusive thereto, cancel, and switch to the next streaming service.

    23. Re:It was pointless by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I frequently find myself saying "I'd like to watch X, is it on Netflix, Hulu, or Amazon Prime?" and having to search each site independently.

      I've read that the fourth-generation Apple TV can do this.

      The Amazon TV stick can, too, for any apps you have installed.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    24. Re: It was pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be better to be able to buy what we want once and then watch them when ever and where ever we want?

      I also don't have time to sit down and binge watch anything. My entertainment needs to come according to my schedule, not the other way around.

    25. Re: It was pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

    26. Re:It was pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      playing a blu-ray on a PC a hassle free experience.

      You mean the kind of software that honours prohibited user operations like, oh I don't know, SKIPPING TO THE FUCKING MENU IMMEDIATELY without being forced to sit through minutes of bullshit? The kind of software the needs internet access to play new titles? Sorry but "hassle-free bluray player" is an oxymoron

    27. Re:It was pointless by mukfe.com · · Score: 1

      how to watch Drama Online

  3. (shrug) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For what they've done in the past...
    Until the mpaa bends over and kisses my ass personally i'm going to pirate everything. forever.

    It's not as bad as they deserve. But it's the best i can do.

    1. Re: (shrug) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They deserve to be forgotten. Narcissists.

    2. Re: (shrug) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly surprised that the **AAs haven't been forcibly disbarred yet. Jack Thompson got disbarred for frivolous lawsuits against violent video games, you'd think that groups who frequently file suits in the range of 8-14 digits for minor cases of filesharing would have had an entire library worth of books thrown at them at supersonic speed.

  4. Public domain movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a list of several movies that are in the public domain.

    But I don't think that list is complete. This is a list of the movies in the Bell System Science Series series (ex: "Our Mr. Sun"), with indications of which are in the public domain.

    So you can watch these movies on YouTube with no guilt.

  5. Reminds me of an issue I had with True Lies by bobstreo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I rented the VHS tape of it. Put it in the VCR, it wouldn't play. I tried about 3 other copies (from Blockbuster) and none of them would play. Finally found out there was a new Macrovision (copy protection) version on the tape that was "Incompatible" with my 1 year old VCR.

    I find most of my legal movie and television needs can be met using archive.org and an antenna, and Netflix.

    1. Re:Reminds me of an issue I had with True Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I rented the VHS tape of it. Put it in the VCR, it wouldn't play. I tried about 3 other copies (from Blockbuster) and none of them would play. Finally found out there was a new Macrovision (copy protection) version on the tape that was "Incompatible" with my 1 year old VCR.

      I find most of my legal movie and television needs can be met using archive.org and an antenna, and Netflix.

      Yes, I remember those days. Putting on the bear skin, strapping on the stone knife and hiking to the Blockbuster across the glacier.

      If one were lucky, you'd come across one's neighbors stalking a woolly mammoth and you could join in and hopefully, get a kill and it's dinner and a movie night!

      One time when I was returning my movie, I had to run for my life from a saber tooth cat and dropped the movie. I had to pay $100 for the damn thing!

      Now, I've come into the modern age and take my horse and buggy to the Target and buy DVDs from the bargain shelf or go to a RedBox.

    2. Re:Reminds me of an issue I had with True Lies by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I stopped - full stopped - giving any care or consideration for what some deem as 'legal' downloads. I see how the execs and the rich live their lives; they are essentially lawless, amoral and uncaring about anyone but themselves. so, I model myself from my 'heroes' and, all of a sudden, I save myself a lot of money and wasted time on DRM issues. I free myself from even thinking that 'downloading' is wrong. its not wrong. or, its no more wrong than how the content 'owners' treat us, the consumers.

      if someone treats me like shit, why would I turn around and give them respect?

      so, I stopped caring and I do as I please, just like the rich class does. I'm not rich, but I see no reason why THEY get to play one set of rules and us rubes have to play by another.

      fuck that.

      treat us fairly and maybe we'll turn-about. but not with things the way they are. you have declared war on your own customer. you have shown your hand. and we have shown ours. the war ends when YOU stop the war. we've not going to just roll over because you say so.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Reminds me of an issue I had with True Lies by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      and hiking to the Blockbuster across the glacier.

      Same story with me, except it was uphill both ways!

      This whole thing reminds me I see Getty images has really nice photos ones I'm willing to pay except $575 is a bit much. Then if want to pay (at least last time I examined) it seemed you need to be in the publishing business as there were lots of requirements and questions which most I couldn't understand. It seems The Business makes it difficult to distribute, there are current celebrities and stars but others from the past could disappear from the internet unless some dedicated fans put together a site of their own.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    4. Re:Reminds me of an issue I had with True Lies by boundandgaggedwomen · · Score: 1

      Pretty much how I live now also. Good enough for them is good enough for me.

  6. I'll admit to landing on and using the page. by Samurai+Nigel · · Score: 2

    When I go to watch a movie or start a new series, I usually check to see if it's already showing on any of the various services I'm already paying for. Why go searching for a movie if I can just fire up Netflix, Hulu, Prime Video or Crunchyroll? Sites that track what's currently playing on the major services are useful, since you can quickly "search" all of your services at once. It kind of reminds me of the old "Dogpile" search engine (which I literally just found out is still somehow a thing) that searched the other search engines for you, back when there was no parity in the sites they returned.

    I agree with the above sentiment that the service wasn't incredibly useful a lot of the time, since it did tend to point to a bunch of random services that I'd never heard of, and therefore didn't really trust. Still, a site that can keep track of the content offered on your streaming services IS still useful, in my opinion.

  7. Roku's used to never have a good search interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They still don't have the best one.

    I used to use this site just to see if something was on one of the many accounts I do legally have (netflix/amazon/hbo/showtime/epix).

    Of course it was mostly useful in determining if I already had access, or if I needed to fire up VPN and torrent.

  8. WhereToWatch rating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this be true? https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wheretowatch.com

  9. Lots of issues with their services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also the issue with their retarded regions and suddenly pulling shows of movies from services, pretty much makes such search engines useless. I will usually find that a show I would want to watch only is available through the US or the UK version of Netflix, and not the stripped version we are thrown as a bone, here in Norway. This is the sole reason why I have stopped consuming both TV shows and movies. They simply aren't made available to me through legal means. I listen to Spotify pretty much every day and happily pay for that service, I also buy games through Steam worth hundreds of dollars every year. I'd be happy to do the same with TV shows and movies too, if they could make their services simple, reliable, a "full library" and not decide to pull every show I start to watch when they feel like it. There is no chance in hell I'll bow down and pay for a service that feels like a scam.

  10. Well, They're Not Wrong by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least in my sphere of the world, JustWatch has cornered the market for streaming listings. There hasn't really been a need to use anything else. So while the MPAA's effort was half-hearted to begin with, there really isn't a need to keep it up when there are other, better options.

  11. There are still no legal alternatives to piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I still pirate 100% of the movies that I watch at home (though I do still go to theaters once or twice a year). If you make movies for a living, I am basically an ex-customer who is waiting for you to re-open for business. (But by "waiting" I sure as fuck don't mean that I've stopped watching your movies.)

    AFAIK there is currently not a single way to legally buy a movie that you can legally play. There is proprietary streaming, where you don't really buy a copy of the movie and you also have to run weird, unaudited, unmaintainable software to play them. Then there's optical disks, which you actually can buy but it's illegal to play the movies.. unless (here we go again) you use unusually shitty and unsafe software, which no reasonable person would ever do.

    Meanwhile, pirates supply perfectly-working files. You can play them legally (though the acquisition is illegal). Furthermore, you can play them sanely. By pirating, I avoid all the malware, orphaning, and generally unpleasant experiences that you get with having to use proprietary players. Nothing else even comes slightly close to the convenience, safety, and elegance of piracy.

    THIS NEEDS TO CHANGE. MPAA members should sell un-DRMed files, or else resign themselves to the fact that they are still encouraging piracy and lots of people are susceptible to their encouragement. One thing's for sure: they obviously give zero fucks about sales and revenue. If you own stock in an MPAA company, you should probably be suing their management for not being open for business yet. Customers exist: why don't you take their money? Opening for business is what anyone would do if they were trying to perform their fiduciary duty.

    1. Re:There are still no legal alternatives to piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many of us would be more than happy to point couchpotato at some MPAA servers and pay them for a pristine copy. I won't accept them tracking my watching, determining what hardware/software I can use to watch it or how many people I can lend it to.

  12. Legal Alternatives? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Like say how Mission Impossible 2 and 4 are available on Netflix, but not 1 3 or 5? Or maybe those legal alternatives like the show I was in the middle of watching when it suddenly disappeared from the library? Or maybe we're talking about me hitting a download button on something I've downloaded but wasn't able to watch on a previous flight only to get a warning saying that I am only allowed to download this thing Netflix knows has never been watched one more time, only for that download to fail and lock me out of the system preventing me from downloading it again.

    Are those the legal alternatives?

    There was an easy solution to all three scenarios:

    1) Torrents
    2) Torrents
    3) Torrents

    All have served me far better than the legal "alternatives" which is a big stretch of the word.

  13. We're going in the wrong direction... yet again by MikeDataLink · · Score: 2

    When Netflix streaming came out I said "This could end piracy. Finally." Then the stupid movie companies decided it wasn't good enough and spun up 400 different streaming services. Defeating the very solution that would have fixed the problem.

    I refuse to have multiple streaming subscriptions just so I can watch one show on your service.

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  14. missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are more than 140 lawful online platforms in the United States for accessing film and television content, and more than 460 around the world

    ...but that's the problem? Why would I spend several hours shopping around for a good deal on a license to watch a 90 minute movie when I could spend 20 minutes finding and downloading a less legitimate copy?

  15. I actually used this. by damnbunni · · Score: 1

    I'm often looking for weird and obscure things, and WhereToWatch actually did point me toward some, in places I never would have found.

    It also had listings for things that just aren't out there anywhere, so at least I'd know to stop looking for a legit copy.

  16. Depends on whether you rewatch by tepples · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be better to be able to buy what we want once and then watch them when ever and where ever we want?

    For things you repeatedly rewatch, such as a single-digit-year-old child's favorite animated movie, that would be better. Otherwise, you're paying $10+ to watch a movie or a TV season once, and it's cheaper to binge, switch, binge, switch. And once you switch back, you end up seeing a different selection with new stuff to binge watch.

    1. Re:Depends on whether you rewatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has never been anything that I watched that I didn't want to watch again. If it's something I don't like, I won't even finish watching it. It should be no different than buying music.

      And as I already said I don't have time to binge watch anything, even if I wanted to. I have a life and responsibilities.

    2. Re:Depends on whether you rewatch by tepples · · Score: 1

      There has never been anything that I watched that I didn't want to watch again.

      I know people whose viewing habits differ greatly from yours. Quoting this post by calima:

      I don't find any replay value in Zelda, Mario, or other such highly regarded games, so my opinion is certainly not limited to current AAA devs or walking simulators. It's rather about what I enjoy in a game, and that I have an excellent memory. If I know what happens next in a movie, book, or game, it is no longer fun to me. I acknowledge I'm in a minority in this position.

    3. Re:Depends on whether you rewatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. Different people have different habits.

      I rewatch films. I reread books. I relisten to music. I replay games. I value quality over newness and most of what is "new" is actually a cheap imitation of something that came before. I tend to find new meaning, perspective and insight into things that I have already experienced due to the depth of the message or due to my own personal growth and perpetually changing understanding of existence. On occasion, something new will get my attention and those get added to my collection to be enjoyed again and again over the course of my life.

      I have no idea who "calima" is, why I should care about his opinion or why you quoted him as though it were a counter to anything I've said. I live according how I want to live, not according to how others live.

  17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GifS4zwggE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0