Facebook To Put 1.5 Billion Users Out of Reach of New EU Privacy Law (reuters.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Facebook: If a new European law restricting what companies can do with people's online data went into effect tomorrow, almost 1.9 billion Facebook users around the world would be protected by it. The online social network is making changes that ensure the number will be much smaller. Facebook members outside the United States and Canada, whether they know it or not, are currently governed by terms of service agreed with the company's international headquarters in Ireland. Next month, Facebook is planning to make that the case for only European users, meaning 1.5 billion members in Africa, Asia, Australia and Latin America will not fall under the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which takes effect on May 25. That removes a huge potential liability for Facebook, as the new EU law allows for fines of up to 4 percent of global annual revenue for infractions, which in Facebook's case could mean billions of dollars.
Zuckerberg's apology tour was short-lived, back to usual business.
Facebook already stated that they will afford the same EU type level of protection for ALL the user base.
This change just aford them two things:
1.) Protection if by mistake they screw up and end up in a non-compliance event with EU directives (say, human error, security breach, inside attack). So, instead of all of the users suing, unly those in the EU suing.
2.) In case they have a change of heart and decide to not afford those protections any more, Is easier if the non-EU users are also outside EU jusrisdiction.
*** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
I have European (EU), Asian, and North American phone numbers. I do not have a Facebook account. My contacts have probably shared my info with Facebook. Does Facebook consider me to be covered by EU privacy directives or not?
"fines of up to 4 percent of global annual revenue for infractions"
Revenue = 12.97B
4% = 518 million
https://www.google.com/search?...
Too all good things must end. Eventually even good things become corrupt and Facebook is no exception. I deleted my account and it probably should have never created a profile to begin with.
And they'll never pay a dime.
Seems a bit too much of having their cake and eating it too, if they can say their are an Irish company for the tax breaks but not an Irish company for the data ownership.
Email, IRC, pic, hobbies, age, real name, location, etc. Then one day I realized what an idiot I was and slowly scrubbed every forum profile.
so they get to pay Irish tax rates, I ought to get Irish privacy. I ought to, but looks like I don't.
I do like how the EU does fines. A percentage of gross revenue. Here in the states we do dollar amounts, which tends to make them less than the profit from the crime.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
There is nothing to apologize for. If newspapers assert the right — both legal and ethical — to publish state secrets they obtain as a result of somebody's felony, and the courts agree, how can Facebook (or anyone else) be denied the right to or even reprimanded for publishing personal information given to it willingly?
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
I'm assuming that when this change takes place, affected users will be presented with a new ToS to agree with. How does this affect those who do NOT agree with the new ToS?
I get that they will not be able to continue using the "service", but their old data must still be protected when the GDPR goes into effect, right?
Seems like this is the perfect opportunity for those in affected areas, who were on the fence about deleting their facebook account, to KEEP the protections that will be offered by the GDPR, and not allow their data to be exfiltrated to locations that DO NOT offer those protections. I mean, they can't move your data out of the EU jurisdiction if you don't agree with the new ToS, right?
Also how about we find a reason to put Zuckerberg in jail?
Come on people haven't you all had enough? There's the phone, and email to keep in contact with people you actually care about. Isn't it time you left Facebook for good?
EU-GDPR doesn't work that way. Data privacy and protection is a human right according to the EU. Hence it also applies to anyone just traveling through the EU, all the actions taken while the subject is in the EU fall under the EU-GDPR even if they are not a EU citizen. That is the same as all the other human rights in the EU (and basically anywhere). They apply to "humans" in that area, and not only citizens.
Source: Rushing to be compliant.
Not even from the citizens, who are traitors and secretly work for the state's adversaries?
Sorry, that's like saying, if you did nothing wrong, you shouldn't have anything to fear from your information being disclosed...
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
I would have thought that the intent of the law was to cover EU citizens, no matter where they lived on this planet and not as Facebook intends to argue, where they physically live.
Zuck will never remove your data. Doesn't matter what regulation gets handed down
Wow. I would like a look at the sports section of that news service so I can place my bets more intelligently.
"Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.