Slashdot Mirror
Iran Bans Use of Telegram Messaging App To Protect 'National Security' (reuters.com)
Iran has banned all use of the popular Telegram messaging app. The ban had been introduced to protect "national security," said a statement aired on state television. From a report: Iran had been considering the ban since January when protests over economic grievances erupted in more than 80 cities and later turned into demonstrations against the clerical and security elite of the Islamic Republic. Some hardline officials said protesters used Telegram to organize the rallies, which were ultimately contained by the Revolutionary Guards and their affiliated volunteer Basij militia. The app was temporarily blocked in January. "Considering various complaints against the Telegram social networking app by Iranian citizens, and based on the demand of security organizations to confront the illegal activities of Telegram, the judiciary has banned its usage in Iran," state TV reported. "All Internet providers in Iran must take steps to block Telegram's website and app as of April 30," the judiciary website Mizan quoted a court order as saying.
Yet another PR unicorn for Telegram.
Thanks Iran!
...or first post?
I distinctly remember that Telegram's encryption sucks.
So you're saying your nation's security can be compromised by a simple app? I hope they have many fingers to block all the holes in the dam.
"I distinctly remember that Telegram's encryption sucks."
If it sucked, it would pretty weird for both Russia and Iran to ban and block it.
Telegram operates in a simpler less secure mode by default, and when you want true end-to-end encryption you need to explicitly start a 'private chat'.
The default mechanism cloud stores the messages, which lets you have messages sync'd to multiple devices etc, lets you send messages when the other person is offline.
The 'secret chat' mechanism is end-to-end single device to single device, and it only works when the other party is online (so the messages aren't stored and forwarded by telegram, but directly sent between devices. And if you logout the key for the chat is deleted, so the messages are gone if you log back in. It also has gimmicks like expiring self destruct messages etc. (Naturally, the recipient can do the usual stuff to keep a self-destructing message... but it does mean if law enforcement or something gets your phone old messages will be gone.
So it sounds like the default isn't really much better than skype or whatever, but the private chat mechanism appears to be getting a ringing endorsement from both Russia and Iran now.
The United States National Security Agency (NSA) builds data centre to warehouse all communications on the internet to protect 'National Security'.
While I deplore what Iran has done here, it seems to me it is also peanuts compared to what the nations of the 'Free World' are doing.
I distinctly remember that Telegram's encryption sucks.
If it's good enough to piss of iranian and russian gouvernment it should be good enough for most people.
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
Dictators being dictators.
Table-ized A.I.
"Iran Bans Use of Telegram Messaging App To Protect the people in power from their citizens "
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
if your national security relies on people not using a communication app your in for a lot of trouble.
The companies that have sold tech to Iran that enables them to do this should be the real story here, not just one app
Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
Whats next, Israel prevents freedom of movement of the owners of the land theyve stolen? Jesus man, them Jews are shameless war criminals!
If you need an easy free way around telegram being blocked, search on twitter for "telegram socks".
A few people are running socks5 proxies that you can just enter in telegram settings. You might have to try a few to find a good one.
Telegram traffic is all encrypted so there should be no practical privacy problem.
Tor and I2p may also work, with the hassle of running extra software, and tends to be slower than the socks proxies.
Ahahahaha! So free.
I dislike the poster's strategic addition of quotes around "national security," which are not in TFA. It really is a matter of national security. Whether or not we like that nation or give a fig about its security is irrelevant.
This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
Sometimes I wonder if that is what they want you to think, similar to a Streisand effect.
2 Can someone quickly just roll a replacement?
This is why we need to find a way around the service provider. They are the weak link.
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
Okay.
Government. No "u" in English spelling. Also we usually capitalize names of countries/nationalities.
Finally, it should be noted that your English seems to be better than most other people's English.
"I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
Why would it be any less secure, even if Telegram stored and forwarded (encrypted, with keys known only to the endpoints) messages?
Answer: It wouldn't.
If that were the case, then directing the ISPs to block it's servers and prevent it from functioning in Russia and Iran would be pretty counter productive. If they were trying to trick you, they'd ban it, but make damned sure it remained really easy to get and that it still worked.
I mean, unless Telegram is hacked by the NSA and the CIA in cooperation with the FSB is getting Russia to block the app their trick American's into thinking it's secure... so that the FBI can spy on them.
And this process of trying to lure us over to telegram is an easier solution than simply breaking into whatsapp and instagram - where people already are; owned and operated by the local company facebook already directly under their jurisdiction.
it must be embarressig for Russia to be the first country to ban this app only to have IRAN be the next country to ban it... That alone says ALOT about Russia and none of it is very flattering...
"Answer: It wouldn't."
And this is why you shouldn't be put in charge of security implementations.
A warrant could be issued or a law could be passed requiring telegram to store copies of all messages that pass onto its servers. Then if law enforcement were able to obtain at a future date one of the endpoints with the chat still running, they would be able to read all the messages between them, even if they'd been deleted on both endpoints.
Or a future development could come to pass revealing a flaw in the implementation, and all those stored messages could be decrypted. Or a future development in technology or mathematics could come to pass making it possible to brute force the encryption.
Then there is the whole meta-information level. If the secret chat is inititated directly between two devices, and the messages are passed directly between the devices, then telegram doesn't know, and can't log or report on that meta data. Sometimes it is enough to know who is sending messages to whom and when those messages are sent.