Slashdot Mirror


'Father of GPS' Receives the IEEE Medal of Honor (eetimes.com)

"A former paperboy from Wisconsin passionate about maps led the team in the Air Force responsible for designing the navigation system we use everyday," writes Slashdot reader dkatana. IoT Times reports: At the IEEE honors ceremony today in San Francisco, Bradford Parkinson, a retired Air Force colonel who spent his life between maps and navigation systems, will be awarded the 2018 IEEE Medal of Honor, "For fundamental contributions to and leadership in developing the design and driving the early applications of the Global Positioning System." The current Global Positioning System (GPS) did not exist until 1995, just 22 years ago, and the engineer who led the project for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) was Mr. Parkinson.

Parkinson, whose first job was delivering newspapers, had a passion for maps. He used those maps when canoeing to navigate the lakes and streams of Minnesota, aided by a hand compass. When he graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1957 with a Bachelor of Science in Engineering, he joined the Air Force to study navigation systems. In 1960, when his superiors saw his engineering potential, they sent him to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to pursue graduate studies. He became a protegee of Charles Stark (Doc) Draper, the father of inertial navigation, who was teaching at MIT at the time. Draper was the lead engineer developing the computer systems for NASA's Apollo program. [...] It was in 1972 when his path on inertial navigation collided with satellite systems. He had been recently promoted to colonel when he received a call from another colonel who was part of the Air Force inertial guidance "mafia." He moved to Los Angeles and joined the group, a bunch of Air Force engineers from MIT. Then Parkinson asked to work on the Air Force 621B program, the genesis of GPS.

22 comments

  1. Re:Waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should have developed Google Maps?

  2. former paperboy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What a remarkable rise in station!

    I'm a former embryo, but look at me now: I've risen through the ranks to become anonymous coward!

  3. Re:Waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    completely useless without blockchain.

  4. Parkinson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parkinson? I expect him to be shaken with the news.

  5. I knew him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew him and his family at the time he came up with this stuff. Him and his brother too would try to explain it to me but I couldnâ(TM)t understand. I guess I didnt get Parkinsons.

  6. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is boring. You're boring me!

  7. Re:Waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GPS = Gay Pole Smokers?

  8. Father of GPS? by Jeff1946 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Roger Easton is a better candidate see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    As I recall both the Navy and the Air Force had different ideas for a GPS system. Eventually the Navy version was selected and the Air Force was chosen to manage it. The Air Force system as I recall involved a mix of low orbiting satelites and geo-syncronous ones.

    1. Re:Father of GPS? by mikael · · Score: 1

      The Navy still want an underwater GPS, using buoys and accoustic spekers distributed across the world.

      https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik....

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Father of GPS? by fozzy1015 · · Score: 1

      Roger Easton is a better candidate see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... As I recall both the Navy and the Air Force had different ideas for a GPS system. Eventually the Navy version was selected and the Air Force was chosen to manage it. The Air Force system as I recall involved a mix of low orbiting satelites and geo-syncronous ones.

      I'd mod this up if I had points. Roger Easton is the inventor of GPS and a better pick for this award.

    3. Re:Father of GPS? by fozzy1015 · · Score: 2

      Roger Easton is a better candidate see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... As I recall both the Navy and the Air Force had different ideas for a GPS system. Eventually the Navy version was selected and the Air Force was chosen to manage it. The Air Force system as I recall involved a mix of low orbiting satelites and geo-syncronous ones.

      I'd mod this up if I had points. Roger Easton is the inventor of GPS and a better pick for this award.

      On second thought, maybe the fact that Parkinson is still alive might have some bearing on who won the award.

    4. Re:Father of GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parkinson shared the Draper price with Ivan Getting in 2003, and Getting died the same year. Parkinson praised the work of Getting and Easton as co-inventors of GPS.

    5. Re:Father of GPS? by Wizardess · · Score: 1

      Roger Easton was without a doubt the father of satellite navigation systems. Colonel Parkinson, as I met him and presented proposals to him when I was at Rockwell International, was the ramrod, the father, of GPS, also without question.

      I say that without reservation even considering that he hired some consultants to help critique our presentations that went on to become our competitors on the next generation of the pre-launch test receiver for the GPS satellites. That smudges his reputation. But, he's still the father of GPS with Roger Easton upstaging him as the father of satellite based navigation.
      {^_^}

  9. Time to get my eyes checked by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0

    'Father of GPS' Receives the IEEE Medal of Honor

    I first read that as "FREE Medal of Honor" and wondered, "do other people pay for theirs?"

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  10. Stanford? by xx_chris · · Score: 2

    Didn't he get a PhD from Stanford and teach at Stanford?

    https://profiles.stanford.edu/...

    1. Re:Stanford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes he did, but earlier in life he delivered news papers. It's important people know that. He may have mowed someone's lawn once as well but I haven't been able to verify that 100%.

  11. Gravity Probe B? by thogard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The main article mentioned it but he was also involved in Gravity Probe B which was what he was working on when I meet him.

    He was heavily involved in fixing the relativity issues in the Navstar system and might have been the key person on that.

    Dr Draper's project was the key in developing many of the early advances in making the integrated circuit and digital processing. In the days before Apollo, NSAS had a problem where they would measure the altitude of a rocket with pressure and radar altimeters in the rocket, altimeters and radar in chase planes as well as using radar and optical tracking from the ground. They spent months trying to figure out why the error was increasing over the downrange distance for all the techniques. The ground station would report the lowest, and the chase planes reporting slightly higher with the closest one reporting lower than the rocket. When they flew the 1st inertial guidance system a young engineer pointed out the error they had been looking for was a result of the earth being round compounded with speed of light issues.

    1. Re: Gravity Probe B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That young engineer was...you?

  12. First gulf war ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current Global Positioning System (GPS) did not exist until 1995

    So what was the GPS they were using in 1990 ?

    1. Re:First gulf war ? by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 2
      Great question!! As in 1991 I reported to 2 SOPS which performed C2 of a non-existent (according to this article) satellite system. We created navigation uploads based on fake Pseudo-Ranging from about 20 fake satellites received by fake monitoring stations. The Khalman filter took the fake PRs and created fake navigation uploads. I, as the Satellite Operator, started GPS (by name alone) satellite supports by slewing ground antennaes to a fake location (we used wiijii boards and random number generators for az and elev ) to then radiate into blank open space. Funny thing is watching Patrick AFB have fake launches!! They would load billion dollar Delta2 rockets on the pad, pretend they were fitting a GPS satellite onto the top, and then launch nothing into space. We would do pretend thruster firings to get it into a transfer orbit, and then de-spin the fake satellites.

      So many fake things I did. OH! And we even stood up a Training Squadron, 534th TRS at Vandenberg to train fake satellite operators!! It's a shame only my last years teaching was to people flying real satellites. I guess we had good practice from years of faking it.