Slashdot Mirror


Sony In $2.3 Billion Deal For EMI, Becomes World's Biggest Music Publisher

Sony said on Tuesday it would pay about $2.3 billion to gain control of EMI, becoming the world's largest music publisher in an industry that has found new life on the back of streaming services. Reuters reports: The acquisition is the biggest strategic move yet by new CEO Kenichiro Yoshida and gives Sony a catalogue of more than 2 million songs from artists such as Kanye West, Sam Smith and Sia. The deal is part of Yoshida's mission to make revenue streams more stable with rights to entertainment content -- a strategy that follows a major revamp by his predecessor which shifted Sony's focus away from low-margin consumer electronics.

The spread of the internet led to a shrinking of the music market from around 1999 to 2014, Yoshida said, but added that has turned around with the growth of fixed-price music streaming services. The deal values EMI Music Publishing at $4.75 billion including debt, more than double the $2.2 billion value given in 2011 when a consortium led by Sony won bidding rights for the company. EMI currently commands 15 percent of the music publishing industry which combined with its Sony ATV business would make the Japanese giant the industry leader with market share of 26 percent, a company spokesman said.

28 comments

  1. I'm done with sony like 2 decades ago by TigerPlish · · Score: 2

    They made their name making amazing hardware... I saved for months until I got the Walkman that was barely bigger than the cassette itself.. I had Trinitron monitor, Trinitron TV..Sony VCR. Their stuff was very capable of triggering the drools and the gimmie-gimmies. 70's and 80's.. yeah. Droolworthy kit. ...and then, about 20 years ago, they abandoned electronics. Their stuff became cheap, derivative. No longer bleeding edge.

    I read Morita's book on Sony. I'm left wondering "So, where did Sony go?" I don't see that Sony anywhere anymore. The scrappy little company built on rice cookers (their first product, but not branded Sony) and tape recorders (their first branded product) is no more, it's just a shell. I guess PlayStation is the last shred left. They even fucked the cinema owners with SDDS and left them hanging.

    Having to buy EMI to pad their music fluff doesn't speak well for Sony's future. Don't you have to *make* stuff to *sell* stuff? Or have I missed a gigantic paradigm shift?

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:I'm done with sony like 2 decades ago by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Companies follow a pattern: 1-Do great stuff and make money. 2-try to make more money without more effort. 3-coast on your brand name, sucking all the life out of the corporation before you leave with your golden parachute.

    2. Re:I'm done with sony like 2 decades ago by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Since music producers are being absolutely killed by home taping, you wonder why Sony would pay 2 billion dollars to take one one?

    3. Re:I'm done with sony like 2 decades ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sony

      The Iphone and Samsung phones are hardly low margin electronics. You missed that boat when you stopped striving for the best. Sanyo, Akai, folded.
      Your target audience and growth market will be tech savvy , angry millenials that will not put up with extortion and geo-differentia pricing. 2Gig preloaded disk drives at the Russian markets are also available.However DAB+ is also cutting your grass, only for those who accept low fidelity.

      I stopped buying music when shopping malls blasted my eardrums with shopping mall noise - my ears need a rest, I have less time for music, as work tries to get freebies on my phone/pad away from work. I dont have time to watch my DVD collection, or even watch TV - all energy goes to paying the rent.

      EMI were smart. They see discretionary spending shrinking as ponzi rent extraction by landlolders suck the middle class dry. Stock market multiples at an all time htigh for all boats. The tide will go out. When it does, thin capitalisation and gearing deductability may be enforced by tax authorities.

    4. Re:I'm done with sony like 2 decades ago by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      4 Extend copyright so nobody else can make new stuff and everyone is stuck buying your old crap thats why they think buying EMI will work for them the back catalog

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    5. Re:I'm done with sony like 2 decades ago by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      The problem is that great hardware is now a commodity. You used to have to pay a lot of money to get high quality equipment. It required a lot of R&D to create a good product so it required high markups. However, with the decades of innovation, we are now able to get very good products for a very small amount of money. There are still companies selling high end equipment, but the majority of people just generally can't tell the difference or just don't care about the difference.

      The PlayStation points right to this problem. It's a commodity piece of hardware built off generic parts.You can pick one up right now for $400. Sure you could probably get a better experience from a PC, but you'll be hard pressed to even build a PC for that amount of money. Especially one that can play games at the level of the PS4.

      "Good Enough" products are taking over the market. I got a $300 phone, almost a year back, and it does everything I need a phone to do. Why would I pay $1000 for a phone when the $300 phone isn't really all that different in day-to-day experience?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:I'm done with sony like 2 decades ago by willaien · · Score: 1

      I was done with Sony after I got burned twice on their consumer hardware. Once with Xperia Play, again on the PS3. With the play, they promised an upgrade to Android 4.0 (yes, this has been a while back), which never materialized. Got burned with the PS3 over OtherOS.

  2. I gave up on music by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    it's too much trouble to find nowadays. I miss the heyday of eMusic when I got 70 songs for $20/mo. I could pull 7 or 8 albums, most of which were crap but a few were great. Then they decided to go all in on competing with Apple (they're big in Europe) and raised prices to $0.99 cents a song. That makes music sampling and finding new bands a lot harder. I could drive down to my local record store.... 40 miles away. Haven't had much luck on youtube either. It doesn't help that I'm old and the kind of music I like is dead and gone.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I gave up on music by mentil · · Score: 1

      The major music labels arguably all do the same thing anyhow (the RIAA doesn't help with this), how many bands can you tell what label they're with? It's not like DC vs. Marvel, or Pixar vs. Dreamworks, where it's pretty clear which is which.

      Ontopic: Finding new music is easier than ever, now. No more listening to the radio station you like and praying you hear something that's not in heavy rotation, or that something new rotates in. Now there are countless online streams, satellite radio channels, and websites dedicated to finding/hearing new music (e.g. Pandora). Youtube has plenty of old/rare music as well; want a video of Rodney Dangerfield rapping, or a lost performance of a jazz great? They've got it. Many online music stores let you play back parts of songs that are for sale, to tell if you like them (or if it's that song you're trying to find). And there are other sites dedicated to free (legal) streams and downloads, where I tend to find the best stuff (e.g. Bandcamp, Soundcloud). On the internet, almost nothing is TOO obscure to find.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:I gave up on music by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      That's not the current problem, the current problem is the review of copyright durations due to the excess flow from the internet, everything will end up locked up and choked, simply too much content and you can not differentiate under law, so the copyright crunch is inevitable, no need to promote anything, already too much, copyright will be shrunk and how low can it go is now the question. Copyright the new global conflict?!?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:I gave up on music by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to spend $20 a month for 7 or 8 albums when you could spend $10 a month an get access to basically all the albums. I was on eMusic back when there was no subscription services, but I cancelled after a while because I realized that was usually just downloading random stuff to make sure I got my money's worth.

      I know a lot of people are against subscription services, but personally I think they are great, but only because they got the price right. For less than the cost of a single album per month, I have access to a huge catalog of music that includes most of the stuff I would have bought anyway. Sure I don't "own" the music, but it also offers a lot of convenience. I can access that entire music library without having to go through any trouble with ripping my CD collection, having a server, or having a massive amount of storage on every device that I may want to listen to music on.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:I gave up on music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure I don't "own" the music, but it also offers a lot of convenience.

      Yeah, so very convenient... up the point you find out that a specific version of the music (or any at all) isn't available, or you decide to play the music on a midrange system and see for yourself the subtle but real difference between 320Kbps MP3 and a FLAC, let alone a HD version of it.

      Owning the music has it's shortcomings but please don't pretend there isn't very strong advantages to it.

    5. Re: I gave up on music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried a couple of subscription music services.
      They didn't have the pop artists I like - The Ferrets, SnotKop & A-Mei are probably the three best known.
      None if them had the genres I listened to the most, when growing up - Western,and Township Jazz.
      (Western, not Country & Western. If you don't know thr difference go spend a year listening to nothing but Current 93.)

  3. no more n-words in music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my opinion, it's time to make the n-word taboo for everyone of every color. Right now some "artists" are being silly and asking their non-POC fans to sing along on stage and then act offended when the non-POC sings the n-word that's in their song. It's a cultural change in progress and some people are getting caught in the cross-fire. I don't get why that word is enduring to African-Americans/etc, it should be offensive for anyone to say it, but it is time to stop adding it to new works, just like leaving your kids in a hot car alone isn't ok any more. [on topic]The easy way to make the n-word in popular songs go away like the Rebel flag is to shame any large company that makes any money from calling people the n-word in the songs. Some of the large music companies may insist on keeping the n-word in new music, but I hope that the public that buys music is a little more respectful of everyone.

  4. Compacting by mentil · · Score: 1

    Disney buying Fox, Sony buying EMI, T-Mobile merging with Sprint. Who needs competition?

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Compacting by youngone · · Score: 2

      Getting rid of competition is the end goal for capitalism.
      If the capitalists can get ownership of the regulators, as they have in many industries in the US they have a great leg up towards that goal.

    2. Re:Compacting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalism died in the late 1920s. You should really brush up on your history. You are a full century of thinking behind. Parrot repeater talking points aren't helping anyone these days.

  5. ATV? by spitzak · · Score: 1

    What is Sony ATV? All Terrain Vehicles?

    1. Re:ATV? by Dusthead+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Associated Television, a British music publishing company. It was bought by Michael Jackson in 1985 and sold to CBS records which was bought by Sony.

  6. Worse? by beep54 · · Score: 1

    So now EMI will become exponentially worse than they already are? It's a definite probability so let's cue up the Sex Pistols.

  7. So the big three become the big two by johnsie · · Score: 2

    Universal, Sony and Warner pretty much control music sales around the world. Some interesting statistics about record sales can be found here: https://www.statista.com/stati... Sometimes it's hard to tell if another label is owned by one of those groups.

  8. The United Negro College Fund. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because a Negro mind is a terrible waste.

  9. EMI sounds like music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electro Magnetic Interference sounds like music compared to nowadays music.

  10. Good thing audio DRM is dead by yuhong · · Score: 1

    I remember when Sony bought CBS Records. On DRM, I mentioned before that "Thinking about it, part of the reasons music labels got big is for economy of scale when mass producing CDs for example. Of course, such economy of scale was not needed anymore with the move to digital distribution. This didn't work well with the current debt-based economy where shareholders depends on stocks always going up for things like retirements and companies treat people as "consumers" to be extracted from. I assume that Hollywood has similar problems, right?"