Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Wins A Big Cloud Deal With America's Intelligence Community (spokesman.com)

wyattstorch516 shared this story from the AP: Microsoft Corp. said it's secured a lucrative cloud deal with the intelligence community that marks a rapid expansion by the software giant into a market led by Amazon.com Inc. The deal, which the company said Wednesday is worth hundreds of millions of dollars, allows 17 intelligence agencies and offices to use Microsoft's Azure Government, a cloud service tailored for federal and local governments, in addition to other products Microsoft already offers, such as its Windows 10 operating system and word processing programs.

The cloud agreement gives Microsoft more power to make its case to the Pentagon as it goes up against competitors like International Business Machines Corp., Oracle Corp. and Amazon for the agency's winner-take-all cloud computing contract for up to 10 years.

That contract is expected to be worth billions of dollars, according to the article, adding that "the Defense Department has said it intends to move the department's technology needs -- 3.4 million users and 4 million devices -- to the cloud to give it a tactical edge on the battlefield and strengthen its use of emerging technologies."

One Microsoft executive said this week's deal reinforces "the fact that we are a solid cloud platform that the federal government can put their trust in."

45 comments

  1. agency's winner-take-all cloud computing contract by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what could go wrong?

  2. Realy? Front page news? by cpurdy · · Score: 1

    In other news, CA closed a multi-million dollar deal with a customer who can't bother to do the work internally to prove that they no longer use CA software anywhere and so just agreed to pay whatever they were asked. This week's deal reinforces "the fact that we are a solid cloud platform that the federal government can put their trust in."

    1. Re:Realy? Front page news? by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 2

      The fact that Microsoft is becoming a legitimate competitor to Amazon in the cloud space is front page news. Obviously they have a way to go to catch up but they have clearly distanced themselves from Google in cloud services.

      Much more interesting when there are multiple companies competing for leadership in a tech sector.

  3. BSOD by rojash · · Score: 2

    Just wait till they all get BSOD'd or have to keep re-booting.

    1. Re:BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, good one.

    2. Re:BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A BSOD joke, still, in 2018?

      Oh, wait, this is /. so the raging hate for MS (wait, I meant "M$") never ends.

    3. Re:BSOD by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. Linux doesn't BSOD.

  4. The cloud gives a tactical edge? by llamalad · · Score: 1

    Let me guess-

    It'll be kind of like the inverse of when the Brits cracked Enigma- they let some bad stuff happen to not give away that they'd cracked the code, and not tipping off their adversaries meant that they could continue to decipher all the messages and avoid the very worst stuff.

    The tactical advantage here will be small leaks (courtesy of Meltdown and Spectre and whatever else we haven't heard of yet) that are true and the occasional huge leak that's a ruse.

    1. Re:The cloud gives a tactical edge? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      The tactical advantage here will be small leaks (courtesy of Meltdown and Spectre and whatever else we haven't heard of yet) that are true and the occasional huge leak that's a ruse.

      Joke's on them, I use a beowulf cluster of Commodore 64's.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:The cloud gives a tactical edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are aiming for a cloud assisted facial recognition, target identification, translation, awareness on the field and in the command. It will be more than what will run in the data center, as low latency and connectivity on the field is important. Maybe that edge thing Microsoft has been talking about made an impression of compatible visions.

    3. Re:The cloud gives a tactical edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't, of course. No tactical edge.

      On one hand, there's not a chance in hell that this snakeoil bullshit actually provides the claimed benefits or meets the government's outrageous requirements.

      On the other hand, there is a slight chance that is still a meaningful improvement over whatever legacy snakeoil bullshit they are using right now.

      On the anterior lateral hand, the chance of it being cancelled for sucking is largely uncorrelated with the degree to which it will actually suck. It's a total crapshoot. Sometimes someone points out that emperor has no clothes. Other times nobody does. Total crapshoot.

    4. Re:The cloud gives a tactical edge? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Connect the MS federal cloud to city efforts like Domain Awareness System https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Spy on people like its was PRISM in every city, state, federal, globally.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  5. Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cloudy thinking!

  6. Picard: How the fuck by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Are Oracle and IBM even in a competition for "cloud" services? Their offerings are just legacy hosted servers wrapped with a fuckton of poorly trained people.

    1. Re:Picard: How the fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and nicely wrapped in astronomical contract fees. When I worked for the US DoD I was shocked with what my work site paid Oracle for shit service. Come to think of it, our Microsoft support contract was mind bogglingly expensive and not very useful.

    2. Re:Picard: How the fuck by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Their offerings are just legacy hosted servers wrapped with a fuckton of poorly trained people.

      So they are what you would call a Silicon Valley Cloud Startup then?

  7. MS Hosting Defense Data by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

    ...Is like putting Dracula in charge of blood-bank security.

    WCPGW?

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    1. Re: MS Hosting Defense Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just payback after giving away Skype, Onedrive, and bitlocker encryption keys and Win10 telemetry to the government.

    2. Re:MS Hosting Defense Data by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Its PRISM 2.0

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:MS Hosting Defense Data by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Interesting analogy. One person who would have a lot at stake in ensuring that a blood supply is protected is the person who relies on it as food. Dracula would be most ideal in protecting blood.

      Now to go back to the analogy I think you were trying to say:

      a) Are you saying MS will misappropriate defence data? Care to cite a case where they have done that to an enterprise customer in the past?
      b) Are you saying MS will lose or let this data get into the wrong hands? Care to cite a case where they have done that to an enterprise customer in the past?

      A lot of people see their Windows boxen crash, and ransomware take over because a user clicked a dodgy link and then creatively extrapolate that to: MS cloud services are not secure or to be trusted. But I've yet to see someone actually come up with a direct reason of why.

    4. Re:MS Hosting Defense Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft couldn't do worse than Amazon.

      Amazon's secure versions (Yes, each agency has their own) of the cloud are years behind the Internet version in features. In addition, they have poor support, and low reliability. And aren't secure - so we can't use it for a lot of stuff.

      Recently, the entire cloud I rely on was down for three days. I got a lot of thumb twiddling done, but not a lot of work. Of course, I get paid anyway, so it doesn't matter that much to me... but maybe the taxpayers might care that hundreds of highly-paid national security professionals couldn't work for days because an old, outdated piece of unreliable software?

  8. how many users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the department's technology needs -- 3.4 million users

    1 in every 100 americans is a defense department worker? That can't be right.

    1. Re:how many users? by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      Presumably that includes the US military.

    2. Re:how many users? by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Getting a real handle on this is a hard task because of the web of contractors, subcontractors, and direct employees spread across a bunch of different agencies. DOD has 1.3 million active duty personnel plus 0.8 million in the National Gaurd and Reserve plus 0.7 million civilian employees. That's direct employees. For contractors it's anybody's guess. Just getting a headcount would cost million$. For scale, the US labor force is ~150 million people. So roughly one employed person in sixty works directly for the DOD. If you /ass/ume a 1:1 FTE/Contractor ratio then that's one in thirty. War is big business.

    3. Re:how many users? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      One trusted worker can watch a lot of people. The US has a lot of people who can watch.
      "5.1 million Americans have security clearances. That’s more than the entire population of Norway." (March 24, 2014)
      https://www.washingtonpost.com...
      "Who has security clearance? More than 4.3M people" (June 6, 2017 )
      https://www.usatoday.com/story...
      Nearly 5 Million People Have Government Security Clearances (07.23.12)
      https://www.wired.com/2012/07/...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  9. Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're all going to die!!

  10. Cloud A.I. ? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    We also have cloud Eh Aye in Canada, eh?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  11. Realy? Front page subscriptions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two ways to making a lot of money. Sell to the government. Sell to a business. Why does anyone think there such a push for clouds and subscriptions?

  12. Clippy and Cortana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clippy: It looks like you're trying to fire off nukes. Would you like me to assist with that?
    Cortana: Oh, you're so 20th-Century! You can use Bing Maps for targeting!

    1. Re:Clippy and Cortana by stooo · · Score: 1

      Good one :)
      The problem is bing maps has poor coverage over North Korea for example.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  13. The Citizen Lost by c++horde · · Score: 2

    I wonder how much personal data of Microsoft's customer has to be handed over in the deal.

    1. Re: The Citizen Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of it?

  14. Another triumph for Linux by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    After all, the Microsoft's cloud infrastructure runs on Linux.

  15. Of course, they threw in all their customer's data by gweihir · · Score: 1

    for free. MS would never landed something like this without that. But anybody sane already knows you cannot trust the cloud in any way anyways, so it does not make a lot of difference.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  16. Payoffs by found404 · · Score: 1

    Lots of these "deals" are payoffs for the continued (backroom) cooperation Microsoft and others provide.

  17. Classic Microsoft by volt4ire · · Score: 1

    Looks like they're following their time-honored strategy of embrace, extend, and eavesdrop

  18. fuckholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuckhole software for fuckholes in their cunts fuckholes

  19. yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a solid cloud"

    ummm, yeah, about that....

    1. Re:yep by stooo · · Score: 1

      True, a cloud is never solid.
      It dissipates and disappears over time, just when you need it the most, leaving you outside in the rain.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  20. Enticement by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    Use our cloud service - we give access to all our users' telemetry data for free!

  21. The Smoking Cloud by stooo · · Score: 1

    >> the cloud to give it a tactical edge on the battlefield

    Yeah, but smoke clouds to hide your position is a WWII technology...

    --
    aaaaaaa
  22. Microsoft would sell it's soul for a dollar by SysEngineer · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Sucks! It always works OK, with other Microsoft products, but is always just a little broken with non MS products. It used to FUD (Fear Uncertainty Doubt), EEE (Embrace Extend Extinguish), But it has always been not work the other product and still is. What is is Microsoft going to break in the government? There is no privacy from MS.