Slashdot Mirror


Snapchat's CEO On Facebook's Long History of Copying His Company's Products (theverge.com)

Earlier this week, Snap's CEO Evan Spiegel publicly addressed Facebook's long-standing practice of copying his company's products, joking that Facebook should model Snap's approach to collecting less information about its users. "We would really appreciate it if they copied our data protection practices also," Spiegel said on Tuesday night at the Code Conference in Southern California. The Verge reports: Interviewer Kara Swisher asked Spiegel how he felt about Facebook's decision to copy key Snapchat innovations including ephemeral 24-hour stories and augmented reality lenses. Spiegel first said that his wife, Miranda Kerr, cared more about it than he did. Snap collects less data on users than Facebook does, though it does still allow advertisers to target ads based on demographic criteria that the company gathers. It has never offered a full-featured API that allows users to give away their friends' information, as Facebook once did.

Spiegel went on to say that he looked at Facebook's copying as a designer. "If you design something that is so simple and so elegant, that the only thing other people can do is copy it exactly [...] that as a designer is really is the most fantastic thing in the world," Spiegel said.

17 comments

  1. Was this where he hid behind his wife by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Troll

    This story sounds like a dup - was this where the whiny CEO complained about what his wife did or didn't like?

    1. Re:Was this where he hid behind his wife by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      This just in: Slashdot has just posted a front-page story containing a link to Mashable.com where Miranda Kerr bitches about Facebook not being "innovative" enough.

      "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of nerds suddenly gagged audibly and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened."

  2. not something to brag about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitching about feature theft by a platform with the second worst UX on the internet is not helping Crapchat's cause.

    1. Re: not something to brag about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is a follower. Better to use the leader.

    2. Re: not something to brag about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is a follower. Better to use the leader.

      Not a good enough. I have plenty of reasons to use facebook despite the shit interface, zero to use crapchat.

  3. Snapchat hardly invented anything by eggstasy · · Score: 2

    We had freebie face replacement apps bundled with our webcams like 20 years ago, wtf. We could use them with Skype or anything else because they worked on the driver level.

    1. Re:Snapchat hardly invented anything by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      All Messenger innovation was done as you say 20 years ago AOL, AIM, Yahoo Messenger,MS Messenger,ICQ Messenger. Aim didn't have video when it first came out Yahoo did so who was first to have video? wasn't AOL that's for sure. but as far as messengers go your right that boat floated 20 yrs ago. having text/image delete after how many seconds could count as innovation but hardly something to die for lol

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    2. Re:Snapchat hardly invented anything by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      IRC is even older, about 30 years now, and it had the "#" prefix for topics (well, actually channels which are more like discussion boards per each topic, but basically the same idea). Kids these days...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Snapchat hardly invented anything by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      We had freebie face replacement apps bundled with our webcams like 20 years ago, wtf.

      WTF indeed and I'm calling a huge pile of bullshit. The seminal Viola-Jones face detection algorithm isn't even 20 years old. That was about the first time that realtime face detection got good enough to be viable. A full 20 years ago, the best intel CPU was barely cresting 400MHz.

      No the hell way did we have realtime face detection and tracking of anything approaching usable quality 20 years ago. The computer vision tech wasn't remotely there and even given the best techniques of today the CPU tech was marginal at best.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re: Snapchat hardly invented anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And @chanops, but the problem is truly the fact that ascii is a limited character set.

  4. Slashdot on Slasdot's Long history of dupes by ToTheStars · · Score: 1

    By "earlier this week", do they mean Wednesday? https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

    1. Re:Slashdot on Slasdot's Long history of dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously BeauHD and msmash aren't talking to each other.

  5. "Products" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Evan, those aren't "products". Those are minor UI tweaks to an entirely unoriginal, meaningless application.

    The idea that any of this is considered innovative is a red flag of how deeply rotten and incestuous Silicon Valley is. When this bubble pops it's gonna be glorious.

  6. A facebook by any other name would smell as bad by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    No matter how much they copy, they are still facebook. Right thinking people have better things to do with their internet time.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  7. kinda hard to not collect published information.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    ..and it's not that hard to get said info.

    snapchat OTOH.. the whole company was based on selling snake oil of sharing stuff you couldn't save.

    really it was based on that one idea, which is a snakeoil idea. ironically a lot of more people fucked themselves up unknowingly with snapchat than facebook, because they bought into that idea.

    got any idea how much snapchat non intended to share porn there is? if you can see it, you can save it. simple as that.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.