Slashdot Mirror


VPNFilter Can Also Infect ASUS, D-Link, Huawei, Ubiquiti, UPVEL, and ZTE Devices (bleepingcomputer.com)

Catalin Cimpanu, writing for BleepingComputer: The VPNFilter malware that infected over 500,000 routers and NAS devices across 54 countries during the past few months is much worse than previously thought. According to new research technical details published today by the Cisco Talos security team, the malware -- which was initially thought to be able to infect devices from Linksys, MikroTik, Netgear, TP-Link, and QNAP -- can also infect routers made by ASUS, D-Link, Huawei, Ubiquiti, UPVEL, and ZTE. The list of devices vulnerable to VPNFilter has seen a sharp jump from Cisco's original report, going from 16 device models to 71 -- and possibly more.

188 comments

  1. Good thing I use.... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 1

    PFSense and Routerboard then huh? ;-P

    1. Re:Good thing I use.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you know how to use it correctly. Most do not.

    2. Re:Good thing I use.... by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      There is a whole slew of Routerboard products listed:

      RB411 (new)
      RB450 (new)
      RB750 (new)
      RB911 (new)
      RB921 (new)
      RB941 (new)
      RB951 (new)
      RB952 (new)
      RB960 (new)
      RB962 (new)
      RB1100 (new)
      RB1200 (new)
      RB2011 (new)
      RB3011 (new)
      RB Groove (new)
      RB Omnitik (new)

      That said, are you running pfSense ON the RB hardware? If so, do you have any docs on that? I'm interested.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    3. Re:Good thing I use.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can only get infected on a Mikrotik device if you're leaving the web port open to world, which any admin knows (on any router) is the height of stupidity. VPNs are there for a reason. None of the MTik devices that we manage (some with old firmwares) have been infected because nothing is open apart from the VPN.

  2. Curious lack of Synology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have both a Synology router and NAS and find it curious this entire brand is omitted from getting infected. Thoughts on why this Chinese-made brand isn't affected?

    1. Re:Curious lack of Synology... by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      They authored the malware. It's a dog-eat-dog world....

    2. Re:Curious lack of Synology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have both a Synology router and NAS and find it curious this entire brand is omitted from getting infected. Thoughts on why this Chinese-made brand isn't affected?

      why hack something with backdoors ;~)

    3. Re:Curious lack of Synology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do your own research, Ivan.

    4. Re:Curious lack of Synology... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I read because QNAP and the other mentioned models used BusyBox for their userland, and likely a vulnerable version. Synology uses discrete Linux binaries for its userland, so it wasn't vulnerable because of this.

      I would say that Busybox is a good product, but there have been some CVEs last year which required updates.

      Synology is a Taiwanese company, so I fear it less than a company on the mainland.

  3. Openbsd still fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My openbsd box still secure.

    1. Re:Openbsd still fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as you know.

    2. Re:Openbsd still fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure it is.... if you're an expert on programming and network security, you've personally audited all of the code and compiled all of the executables yourself with a compiler that you've somehow managed to ensure has not been compromised.

      Otherwise, it's a roll of the dice.

    3. Re: Openbsd still fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you just have to monitor net traffic that is all.

    4. Re: Openbsd still fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or not run a firewall at all, solves a lot of problems.

  4. Alt Firmware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if this enters through the stock firmware, or is it a lower level attack? What if we're running DD-WRT or Tomato on one of these routers?

    1. Re:Alt Firmware? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Informative

      From a different article

      Since the research is still ongoing, Talos researchers "do not have definitive proof on how the threat actor is exploiting the affected devices," but they strongly believe that VPNFilter does not exploit any zero-day vulnerability to infect its victims.

      Instead, the malware targets devices still exposed to well-known, public vulnerabilities or have default credentials, making compromise relatively straightforward.

    2. Re:Alt Firmware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's a vuln in the http server. Mikrotik patched it a year ago.

    3. Re:Alt Firmware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wondering too.. as I'm using an Asus RT-AC68u running Advanced Tomato. I rebooted it as soon as I saw the FBI warning on slashdot and three other security websites I follow.

    4. Re:Alt Firmware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is true, but what about other vendors? Do they provide any information on patch level? The article is missing this information.

  5. "Russian" malware, but all CHINESE devices! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fishy?

    1. Re: "Russian" malware, but all CHINESE devices! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isnt russian, its chinese. All the people who were just overloading my router are also from china.

  6. Wishlist ... by lastman71 · · Score: 2

    It would be nice to have modem adsl with openwrt ...

    1. Re:Wishlist ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this malware could be used to mount a giant DDOS attack that would take down the Internet.
      If everyone turns off their router, permanently, the problem(s) will all be solved.

      Then we can all go back to trying to find a place to buy stamps and waiting in line at the store. Hell, some of us may start having weekly dinners with friends again.

    2. Re: Wishlist ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have several lantiq based devices to choose from, pick danube or newer (preferably VR9/ xrx200).

    3. Re: Wishlist ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If everyone turns off their router, permanently, the problem(s) will all be solved.

      You have a modem on your smartphone...

  7. the old "reference design" trick by swschrad · · Score: 1

    hardware is pretty much all the same, and apparently the core software is also a reference design, with the brand tricks all of the include.something variety.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:the old "reference design" trick by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The "core software" is Linux. Pretty much all routers (most standalone devices really) run Linux under the hood. There are a few oddball routers which use a RTOS like QNX or VxWorks (these are the ones you want to avoid if you're hoping to flash a third party firmware). But the vast majority run Linux because it's free. This malware probably wormed its way in via a universal Linux exploit which was patched in the production releases of Linux distros, but not in the much-slower-to-update router firmware releases.

    2. Re:the old "reference design" trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "core software" is Linux.

      you are totally unaware that linux is just a kernel and the distributions are the core software. you are in fact wrong, the bugs are not in the linux kernel, the bugs are in applications, if you think these applications are "linux" then you are even stupider

    3. Re:the old "reference design" trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the Wikipedia entry, the malware worm gets in by trying/using default admin password. So.. just bad default configurations is what it exploits.

    4. Re:the old "reference design" trick by nmo.marques · · Score: 1

      It wont stop until companies are held accountable for security.

    5. Re:the old "reference design" trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The infection method is still unknown, according to everything I've read.

    6. Re: the old "reference design" trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can bet money the linux kernel used is the 2.x branch, or 3.x if you are very lucky. Man, those have plenty of bugs themselves.

      Good on you if you implemented 4.17.0 in your router.

  8. Re: It can't get to my Linux rig... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your spam is unhelpful. It has nothing to do with routers being infected by a nasty bit of malware through old vulnerabilities that have been patched. Take your spam and leave.

    Two days ago, you were posting violent threats in response to users who were criticizing you. That behavior isn't welcome, either.

    And why would anyone use security software from someone who is so unstable as to make violent threats in response to criticisms? Would you threaten violence against someone who found a serious bug or maybe a vulnerability in your hosts file engine?

    I'm sure you'll respond with tired insults like name calling ("ne'er-do-wells", "soyboys", etc...) and violent threats. You just can't help yourself and change your behavior. You've been threatening people for over 15 years, including making personal attacks and threatening legal action against people on Arstechnica and people like Thor Schrock.

  9. Re: It can't get to my Linux rig... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Untrue. You can export his hosts protective list to routers. This threat is covered in many hosts files already. We also see you stalk or impersonate apk. Go away. You aren't deceiving us troll. I don't blame him for wanting to beat the hell out of you. I would too.

  10. Re: Fuck you you stalking little cunt... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post your real address and phone number. Don't be a coward or a hypocrite.

    You're not man enough to do so. You'll continue to hide behind a keyboard and be consumed with rage about any perceived slight.

    What, are you afraid to post your own address and phone number? Are you afraid that law enforcement might show up, arrest you, and put an end to your violent threats?

    Coward.

  11. Re: It can't get to my Linux rig... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just know that APK is incredibly angry when he makes a second post and pretends to not be APK.

    For anyone who's reading this, you can see plainly that APK is incapable of helping himself by not spamming and making violent threats.

  12. Knew you wouldn't do it UNIDENTIFIABLE pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knew you wouldn't do it UNIDENTIFIABLE pussy. You've doxxed me many times here, you know my address. Come here then, face to face/man to man, pussy - like I said - we can settle it ONCE & FOR ALL you fucking WEIRDO stalking freak!

    * I'll cure you whacko - permanently - I'm sick of your shit motherfucker...

    APK

    P.S.=> You'd BETTER keep HIDING bitch - as I said before - IF I ever get ahold of you? YOU are FUCKING done, motherfucker... apk

    1. Re: Knew you wouldn't do it UNIDENTIFIABLE pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are threatening serious bodily harm, perhaps murder, because you're mad about things that have been posted about you online. There are only two possibilities here:

      1) You are a violent person and need to be incarcerated for making violent threats because you're a danger to society... or...

      2) You are so mentally unstable that you need to be involuntarily committed to a mental health facility to be treated.

      I sincerely hope for your sake that you seek help immediately. If you carry out a single one of your threats, you'll probably be facing life in prison or perhaps the death penalty. Your comments leave a clear record of your violent threats for all to see, including law enforcement.

      I did you a favor by not providing you the information needed to harass me beyond Slashdot. If you tried, your days of posting to Slashdot about hosts files would come to an end very quickly. You'd be facing prison time for the rest of your life if not the death penalty.

      Now shut the fuck up.

  13. Re: It can't get to my Linux rig... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You give away you're upset with yourself by you not realizing hosts lists can be used on routers which I point out. I am not apk. You stalk or impersonate apk constantly. Do you really think you fool us? Who did he threaten? An unidentifiable anonymous coward in you? That's like threatening bugs bunny. Less actually. You technically don't exist and are not real. He hasn't done a thing wrong and you can't justify your disgusting stalking of apk no matter how you try. Seek mental help. You need it. You are a stalker online!

  14. Says "bugs bunny" the imaginary person, lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: You're not even REAL so I threaten nobody you unidentifiable anonymous pussy! Quit playing "jailhouse lawyer", stalker. You're no good @ it.

    HOWEVER:

    Like I said, IF I find out WHO you are? You're fucked - no lie/no joke.

    * I truly WILL fuck you up... in FAR more ways than 1, motherfucker.

    APK

    P.S.=> Why? You're a mentalcase who STALKS me you fucking weirdo - YOU (big man behind anonymous stalking) need to get your puny face pounded in is why... apk

    1. Re: Says "bugs bunny" the imaginary person, lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalking? That sounds a lot like what you've been doing to users like Zontar The Mindless. You've been attacking him for literally years and seem incapable of getting over it.

      Do you care at all that your vile posts are all over the internet, for everyone to see? Do you care at all that you've completely destroyed your own reputation?

    2. Re:Says "bugs bunny" the imaginary person, lol! by Khyber · · Score: 0

      Everyone can safely ignore this coward's ass. He won't give his address because he knows he'll be killed the moment he does. Someone give me his address, I'll be sure to end his sanity and make him take his own life.

      He is a little bitch coward. Cowards and their software are to NEVER BE TRUSTED, like Facebook, Google, and many other cowardly big corps. It doesn't matter your size, if you are a weaselly, lying, shilling, spamming, threatening, COWARDLY FUCKING WASTE OF HUMAN SKIN, you are to not be trusted, nor anything you are associated with.

      APK is to never be trusted. REPEAT AFTER ME.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re: Says "bugs bunny" the imaginary person, lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One violent threat after another from APK, the keyboard warrior. You just can't help yourself.

      Even if I posted my name, address, and phone number, there's zero chance you'd actually show up. Your threats are empty. You're nothing but a coward who hides behind a keyboard and hopes that nobody calls his bluff.

      If you weren't a coward and a hypocrite, you'd have posted your own address and phone number.

    4. Re: Says "bugs bunny" the imaginary person, lol! by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      I guess it's not either 1) or 2), but both.

  15. Zontar stalks me via sockpuppets (druggie loon) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going to make more sockpuppets to stalk & troll me with you LITERALLY ADMITTED loon https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5038387&cid=46782891/ + sending me postcards w/ threats too https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4980459&cid=46704073/ you little STALKING whacko??

    Zontar, take your meds you ADMITTED mentalcase https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4985017&cid=46658165/

    &

    You're also a druggie too https://slashdot.org/comments....

    * You're a butthurt loon freak, plain & simple - you did it to yourself, loser... see below for proof.

    APK

    P.S.=> Still trying to live down how I shot you to pieces in the art & science of computing Mr. Butthurt https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5033597&cid=46760851/ ?

    How about proving hosts & my program that builds them are useless too https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5053067&cid=46794235/ ? ... apk

  16. Re: Zontar stalks me via sockpuppets (druggie loon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, some of those links are to posts that are at least four years old, and you're still angry about them. It's just more evidence that you're batshit crazy. You are incapable of controlling your rage.

  17. LMAO says the bony felon Alex McClown... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alex McQuown alias Khyber the felon (literally) - well, come on then you BONY 140lb. whimp - come meet me face to face pussy. You're the "rich man" working on a "minerological society" (lol, breaking rocks on the San Quentin Prison ROCKPILE != minerological surveys).

    APK

    P.S.=> Anyone can look up your name & find you are a lunatic who threatened a D.A. & did TONS of other stupid shit, arrest after arrest & you're a BONY PUNY CLOWN too, lol - a whimp (how STUPID could you be dumbass? LMAO!)... apk

  18. Good Thing I have an Apple Router by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't see it on the list, and I'm pretty sure that they write their own Firmware. Never heard of an exploit of an Apple Router. Ever.

    Apple, PLEASE come back to the Router Business!!!!

    And, while you're at it, please add AirPlay 2 support to the AirPort Express 2 Router/DAC!!!

    1. Re:Good Thing I have an Apple Router by 605dave · · Score: 1

      I assume you are joking, but there is some truth in there. If you knew how to use it the Airport made a great home router

      --
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
    2. Re:Good Thing I have an Apple Router by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      The Airport Extreme is hands down the most reliable consumer grade router out there. In fact, it's better than a handful of business class routers I have used. For years I refused to buy one because I thought "why, it's just a router and it's expensive!" Well, years of fighting with various routers configs, reboots, updates, custom firmware, etc, and noting that the routers I was buying had started going up in price, I finally caved and bought one. My main reason was a friend stated he'd not rebooted his in years and I had no issues at his house. Sure enough, plugged it in, and a host of network weirdness disappeared immediately. Reboots? I generally don't even think about it unless some notification comes out that actually makes me think about my router. I've had more trouble with my ISP in any given year than my router. I'm going to buy another one before stock runs out.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:Good Thing I have an Apple Router by 605dave · · Score: 2

      Bingo. Everyone dismissed it while it simply worked incredibly well. They say it had a "simple" interface not knowing how configurable it was under the hood. I had custom port forwards, IP assignment, DMZ, everything you'd think you'd want on a home router. Then they EOL'd it.

      --
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
    4. Re:Good Thing I have an Apple Router by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 2

      I assume you are joking, but there is some truth in there. If you knew how to use it the Airport made a great home router

      No. I was being dead serious.

      My Airport Extreme 5th Gen Router NEVER needs a Reboot, has most of the bells and whistles expected in a modern router (separate 2.4 and 5 G Networks, Guest Network, Flexible Port Forwarding, etc.) Plus, I can even securely config. the thing over WiFi from my iPad if I so choose.

      Plus it is hands-down the easiest Router I have ever had to set up in Bridge Mode. And it even supports some type of Mesh networking that I have never understood, since I don't have two of them.

      Yeah, now I wish I'd gotten one of the "ac" capable ones....

    5. Re:Good Thing I have an Apple Router by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      FYI - I do have to agree that the interface on the airport utility 6.x is too simple, for about 0.01% of the target audience. It's adequate for 99% of the things people would ever need to do. However, not having an admin interface that exposes the functionality that was available in the 5.6 utility such as signal strength, logs, etc is something I highly desired enough to install 5.6 alongside the new 6.x utility. I don't know if 5.6 works with the latest AEs though.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re:Good Thing I have an Apple Router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, throwing on custom firmware and configs expecting things to not crash occasionally...

      or jumping into a router where you can't possibly ever do any of the functions you list?

      Yeah, I know which one isn't going to crash (mostly because the user). Any $100+ router I've ever used never needed reboots, and those that are $100 only crash when heavily loaded (which I expect). I've also never recieved a notification to reboot my router, so there's that.

      Enjoy being locked to the simple interface.

    7. Re:Good Thing I have an Apple Router by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Yup, throwing on custom firmware and configs expecting things to not crash occasionally...

      Seems like what I expect out of my router - something that routes reliably. Apparently you consider reliability as a lesser requirement.

      or jumping into a router where you can't possibly ever do any of the functions you list?

      What functions did I list?

      Yeah, I know which one isn't going to crash (mostly because the user). Any $100+ router I've ever used never needed reboots, and those that are $100 only crash when heavily loaded (which I expect).

      Well, considering I've owned at least 3 that also purported to run DD-WRT reliably, which they did when the hardware didn't lock up.... At least I'm assuming the hardware because it was a consistent problem across multiple firmware releases across all three. And several of those routers were in the $150 range. And I don't expect my router to crash due to load unless I'm actually intentionally causing a DOS situation on the interface. Normal TCP based usage should not crash a router, ever.

      I've also never recieved a notification to reboot my router, so there's that.

      I was referring to notifications about issues regarding routers, as sent by various newletters, RSS/Atom feeds, ISPs or even noted in websites about potential router issues.

      Enjoy being locked to the simple interface.

      I enjoy the simple interface because it suffices and I don't see it often. If I was in a situation where I constantly needed to reconfigure my router, I'd place a linux/bsd based firewall into the DMZ configuration and deal with all configuration there because I'd likely need more capabilities than any simple consumer based router provides. Right tool, right job. In fact, this is how I'm setup. You can continue to enjoy your unreliable and inherently less capable router, however.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    8. Re:Good Thing I have an Apple Router by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Yup, throwing on custom firmware and configs expecting things to not crash occasionally...

      or jumping into a router where you can't possibly ever do any of the functions you list?

      Yeah, I know which one isn't going to crash (mostly because the user). Any $100+ router I've ever used never needed reboots, and those that are $100 only crash when heavily loaded (which I expect). I've also never recieved a notification to reboot my router, so there's that.

      Enjoy being locked to the simple interface.

      As usual, the Anonymous COWARD spouts off about how his mythical, $5 device (which, as usual, is NEVER named. Why not, eh? Don't we ALL deserve to know about this GREAT DEAL?) beats the pants off of the "Overpriced" Apple gear.

      Funny, that's how these Anonymous COWARD posts almost ALWAYS go.

      So transparent.

  19. Right: Zontar's stalked me for @ least 4-5 yrs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I provide proof of Zontar's admitted sockpuppet stalking/harassing me, his being on drugs & mental care too (lol, whacko) - so it doesn't MATTER how OLD the links are they ARE valid proof of what I said of him - he's a lunatic!

    APK

    P.S.=> You know, between YOU Zontar & "Alex McCLOWN" the felon (alias "Khyber" the 140 lb. whimp) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56738846/ I have you 2 losers figured out - you HATE yourselves for being DO NOTHING "ne'er-do-wells" many time losers on MANY accounts (mainly your own mental issues I put up proof of that you try project onto me but I HAVE PROOF OF IT with BOTH of you, lol, w/ you BOTH admitting it) & try "take it out on me" (like loons YOU Khyber or Zontar are) because I'm EVERYTHING BOTH OF YOU CAN NEVER BE - successful & doing things others like + use too... apk

  20. Zontar/Khyber, you're no threat (just loons) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & you're either Zontar a nutcase who admittedly stalks me via sockpuppets/sends me postcards https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56738800/ OR Alex McQuown alias "Khyber" KNOWN LUNATIC DRUG ADDICTED FELON (multiple arrests in MANY states, not just where he threatened a DA (& weights @ MOST 140lbs. SOAKING WET) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56738846/

    * ... So I know I am dealing with psychotics (but pussy ones, no threat) who are 'tough' behind their keyboards but I have SEEN Alex McCLOWN & he's a puny little druggie dirtbag I'd wipe out in a heartbeat, one punch (I'd be afraid I'd kill him actually, & his kind? ALREADY dead in this life, lol).

    APK

    P.S.=> No, I've got BOTH of you ADMITTED nutcases/felons respectively figured out - not only have I WIPED YOU BOTH OUT in technical debates here MANY TIMES, but both of you HATE YOURSELVES (& I don't blame you, if I f'd up my life as YOU BOTH HAVE, I might hate myself too) & TRY 'take it out' on me, ME, who is successful in life & I make programs folks LIKE & USE too (Your kind? Never will, you're just life's losers)... apk

    1. Re: Zontar/Khyber, you're no threat (just loons) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, I'm neither Zontar nor Khyber, dumbass.

      As for fucking up your life, that's what happens when you spend nearly two decades spewing your vitriol all over Arstechnica and Slashdot for all to see. Your reputation is shit, and it's all your own doing.

      I'm thinking of posting my name and address just to prove what a coward you are.

      You wouldn't dare show up at Edwards AFB and run your mouth, let alone try anything else. Stay behind your keyboard.

  21. Re: Right: Zontar's stalked me for @ least 4-5 yrs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Different AC here. You've been demanding for a long time that people post their real names, addresses, and phone numbers. You demanded that I do that a couple of weeks ago. Against my better judgment, I actually complied with your demand. Despite all your violent threats and saying you'll ruin people, you didn't do a single thing. You are all bark and no bite.

    Take note, everyone. APK makes all sorts of violent threats, but is too chickenshit to follow through with one bit of it.

  22. Re: It can't get to my Linux rig... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times do you plan on reposting this bullshit?

  23. Khyber alias Alex McQuown we know it's you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khyber alias Alex McQuown we know it's you (diff. ac my ass, lol, as I drink a Miller HighLife sitting here lmao @ u, felon homosexual drug addict) - you?

    FACT: I know you're a KNOWN CRACKPOT admitted multiple felon homosexual druggie who WEIGHS MAYBE 135lbs. TOPS & YOU?

    LOL!

    You = pissed @ life being not only born a sexual deviant "AbNoRmaL OnE" (lol) but also for being BOTH puny AND stupid too (how many states did you get arrested in? Tell us, lol, you STUPID shit (threatening a District Attorney too? YOU ARE DUMB as dumb gets!)).

    * You're SO pitiful, I don't even both with YOU or "your kind" especially NOW that I KNOW it's you, see ps below everyone (as your 'touched in the head' & God may strike me down for giving "your kind" guff - he's already DONE THE JOB on you is why).

    APK

    P.S.=> You slipped here giving it away loony boy posting using your REGISTERED 'luser' ACCOUNT https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56738758/ & thought you were going to SUE me (how many times now? 2 at least over 3 yrs. now too?? LOL, bullshit - clue: I merely tell the truth about you, nothing more, can't sue me for it)... apk

    1. Re: Khyber alias Alex McQuown we know it's you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like you keep claiming that Ol Olsoc is projecting, too... LOL!

      You keep thinking that you're arguing with Zontar or Khyber. Make up your mind.

      Hint: I'm neither Khyber nor Zontar, you idiot.

      Also, none of this changes the fact that you were too chickenshit to do anything when I posted my name, address, and phone number.

  24. Awww, did I run you DRY of downmodpoints? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awww, did I run you DRY of downmodpoints already Khyber (known homosexual multiple felon druggie whimp) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56738758/ ?

    LMAO, it appears I have & like you are in LIFE? You're HELPLESS... lol, & I win.

    * Always!

    (Especially vs. "your kind", the DeViAnT "AbNoRmAL OnEz", lmao!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Having fun TOYING w/ your DO-NOTHING zero "ne'er-do-well" jailbird ass now Khyber - it's FUN showing everyone JUST what you are - a loser, lol - especially while I drink a Miller HighLife in the SUN just smiling @ the thought of CRUSHING you as always, lol... apk

    1. Re: Awww, did I run you DRY of downmodpoints? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Khyber posted from his account in this story. Therefore he couldn't have modded you down, dumbass. You're not very smart, are you?

  25. LOL! Where'd you do that? Show us?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it's you jailbird homo druggie felon whimp Alex McQuown https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56738758/ Show where you posted your supposed address/name/phone # too! I never saw it (what did you do IF you did, doubt it, do it like 3 weeks later? LOL!) ... & as far as beating the snot out of your KNOWN psycho PUNY 135lbs. @ MOST ass?

    I don't hit losers like you (especially fags, as I might catch AIDS which you may most likely have from what I read of you)...

    Face facts Alex McCLOWN - you're already FUCKED in life being a felonious loser queer!

    * Talk EVERYTHING that could be wrong w/ a guy & you have "Khyber" Alex McQuown... no shit, lol!

    (LOOK - I'd be pissed @ myself IF I shit up my life like you, some by defect of BIRTH in your case being a whimp & genetic aberration in being a queer, rest is on YOU though, jailboy! I bet you LIKE jail - stalking myself can put you there AGAIN you know - I bet you want to go, lol - you MISS "Leroy" making YOU his personal "teddy bear" lmao... lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You're SO f'ing pitiful (& stupid, slipping posting using your registered 'lusername' (lol, fits you)) you are not even worth it - thought you were going to SUE me too? What happened?? It's been 2-3 yrs. now (threatening to SUE & not doing so is a criminal offense too iirc) - what's the matter?? Did you get SANE for a second & realize that MY TELLING THE TRUTH OF YOUR LOSER LIFE JAILBIRD IS FACT & you can't sue someone over fact??? Obviously, lol... apk

    1. Re: LOL! Where'd you do that? Show us?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure sounds like you've been stalking Khyber. Too bad for you that I'm not Khyber. Too bad all your threats are empty. All bark and no bite, that's you.

    2. Re: LOL! Where'd you do that? Show us?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you lied you posted your name, address and phone # apk could verify to settle with you in person here https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739430/. Oh, I get it. You're trying to forums slide bury your lie now. Pitiful.

    3. Re: LOL! Where'd you do that? Show us?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hilarious how APK thinks every AC is Khyber or Zontar. What a paranoid loser!

      If APK is such a man, he should post his address and phone number. Oh, wait, he's a coward.

      Also, you are APK.

  26. Bwaahaha speak for yourself...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Create sockpuppets to have more modpoints than any 1 account has & abuse 'em stupid. Zontar does it per https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56738800/ so WHO IS NOT VERY "SMART" HERE, stupid?

    YOU Khyber (where you SLIP giving away it is you, jailbird homo druggie felon loony loser) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56738758//

    * Unbelievable, lol... ONLY a freaked out BITCH queer who likes it up the ass (& yes, I KNOW you do) acts like you - no shit!

    APK

    P.S.=> I almost SPIT out my Miller HighLife I am drinking seeing you TRY that utter bullshit, lol... apk

    1. Re: Bwaahaha speak for yourself...apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not Khyber. I modded you down because your posts are off-topic. They are spam and complete garbage. Get lost.

      By the way, hosts do not protect against VPNFilter, since the first stage of the vulnerability can be triggered by an external connection. You're an idiot and your post is off-topic.

  27. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT DOWN

    -1 OFFTOPIC SPAM

    Thank you, moderators.

  28. LMAO, thought you already DID bitch, lol (liar) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & here PUSSY liar you are https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739430/ BIG bad "soulja BOY" you fucking puss ass bitch punk!

    * YOU MAKE ME LAUGH bitch!

    APK

    P.S.=> That's RIGHT cocksucker - I am LAUGHING @ YOU pussy boy & I'd put your BONY ASS into a hospital with ease - come on OVER "big talker" bitch so I can ... apk

  29. Re: LMAO, thought you already DID bitch, lol (liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep on building the case that you're a stalker who makes violent threats. Keep spamming the same bullshit, retard. The police will love the record you're leaving of your threats.

  30. Re: It can't get to my Linux rig... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK, when he's off his meds, is a vindictive bully. Don't defend him.

  31. * Don't TRY play "jailhouse lawyer" w/ ME bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & from behind your "courageous" UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous PUSSY posts - so I threaten nobody due to it & your no balls bitch "ne'er-do-well" PUNK actions you use!

    * Don't TRY play "jailhouse lawyer" w/ ME you UNDEREDUCATED little pussy ass dolt - you're losing just on THAT alone, see above.

    APK

    P.S.=> Man - I know this place has more than its share of morons, but YOU take the cake "Bugs Bunny", lol... apk

  32. RoTfLmAo: "Help me MOMMY", lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LMAO - so I was right: I ran your punk ass bitch self DRY of "downmodpoints" as I said (hahaha) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739414/

    * Don't worry - I run RINGS around your "all-powerful" mods too, with EASE... lol!

    (... & they KNOW it)

    APK

    P.S.=> It makes me lmao watching you SCREAM "Help me MOMMY", lol... apk

    1. Re: RoTfLmAo: "Help me MOMMY", lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I have no mod points, how come your post is at -1 where it belongs?

      LOL! Retard APK looks like a moron yet again.

  33. RoTfLmAo: "Help me MOMMY", lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Help me MOMMY" CRYING for help (apk's right, you're unidentifiable pussies he ran dry of downmodpoints) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739990/

    1. Re: RoTfLmAo: "Help me MOMMY", lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet your SPAM is at -1 where it belongs.

  34. HELP ME MOMMY - RoTfLmAO @ U... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an unidentifiable no balls do nothing "ne'er-do-well" pussy CRYING "Help me MOMMY"https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739990/ I ran you DRY of downmodpoints easily!

    * CLASSIC - RoTfLmAo!

    (PUSSIES)

    APK

    P.S.=> Lazy ass do-nothing ZERO "ne'er-do-well" JEALOUS JOWIE pussies too with no real skills like guys like myself have making programs folks by the 100's of 1,000s use worldwide & you? A forums trolling punk behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts instead (lmao, loser)... apk

  35. Hahahaha "HELP ME MOMMY" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're laughing at you "HELP ME MOMMY" and apk exhausting you/your sockpuppets downmodpoints https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739990/ you abuse stalking him. He always wins and makes you look like the limited idiots you are. I often come here to watch him do it. It sucks to be you. No wonder you hide behind anonymous posts. You know you're a loser.

    1. Re: Hahahaha "HELP ME MOMMY" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what's YOUR reason for posting anonymously and pretending to not be APK?

      You fucking hypocrite!

  36. Looks FINE to me you "HELP ME MOMMY" punk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HELP ME MOMMY I'm outta downmodpoints apk ran me DRY of again as always https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740070/

    * Don't worry - I don't CARE how many sockpuppets you use, I'll run them DRY too (which is good for my weekend, you'll be outta them, lol!)

    Keep @ it - we'll SEE who wins in the end (always me).

    APK

    P.S.=> Face facts whimp "ne'er-do-wells" - you're POWERLESS against me (or guys like ME in life & you KNOW it)... apk

    1. Re: Looks FINE to me you "HELP ME MOMMY" punk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's going on this weekend? Planning on posting a round of spam about bump stocks and Vatican conspiracies?

    2. Re: Looks FINE to me you "HELP ME MOMMY" punk by Brockmire · · Score: 0

      Guys like you should be under 24/7 supervision within white, padded walls.

  37. Looks fine to me "Help me MOMMY", lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check it out & don't worry - no matter how many sockpuppet downmodpoints you have, I'll run you DRY as always https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740070/ & I win, always.

    * You're PROBLEM is you're TOO STUPID to know it - give up, I always win.

    APK

    P.S.=> I love it, lol - classic - best part is, I build GREAT APPS folks here like & use praising it (& 100's of 1,000's worldwide too) & you WASTE TIME. "trolling" like the wastes of LIFE you KNOW you are... you do me a favor - you'll NEVER be competition... apk

    1. Re: Looks fine to me "Help me MOMMY", lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to your abuses of anonymous posting to keep repeating the same spam?

  38. Latest firmware =/= best firmware by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    My Asus router has to run an older firmware version because the LTE USB modem I use for internet doesn't work with the latest firmwares. And yes I run one of the third-party firmwares which incidentally just announced they were no longer going to update this router anyway. No matter what, this Asus is a dead end even though it works just great.

    My backup router is a Netgear which also happens to be on the hit list, yay, but it doesn't work with the LTE modem so it can't be a frontline device anyway.

    The LTE modem is a ZTE with an internal router so it may also be vulnerable. The fun never ends.

    All of this is sending me screaming out to Microcenter to find something that doesn't suck .... and whimpering back into the maw of Comcast so I can ditch the ZTE LTE modem. Dammit.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  39. Re: It can't get to my Linux rig... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll mod you to -1 when I get around to it. I'll let you post a few angry replies first, and make a few more violent threats.

  40. Releasing the BSD version of my program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It's done too (means MacOS X version soon) & you FLAILING "HELP ME MOMMY" https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739990/ hahahahaha!

    * Limited DOLTS such as yourselves aren't men & certainly NO MATCH for me EVEN ON WHAT YOU think is "your ballcourt" where I blow you away, EVERY SINGLE TIME (mainly because you're dishonest little do-nothing bitches that are easy to outthink & outdo).

    Oh, I KNOW you're trying to "forums bury" your defeats (which is all that ever results when you TRY "take me on" lamos) but it's hilarious showing EVERYONE how easy it is to DO to "your kind" (not-men whimps with no balls OR skills).

    APK

    P.S.=> Like I said before - KEEP WASTING YOUR LIVES & TIME 'trolling' - your kind can NEVER ever be competition to me (or guys like me, & we love it)... apk

    1. Re: Releasing the BSD version of my program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you even capable of posting a reply that doesn't contain numerous idiotic personal attacks?

  41. Hahaha u CRY "help me MOMMY" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aw, so I ran you pitiful do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells" DRY of your downmodpoints again HELP ME MOMMY https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739990/

    * Keep wasting your LIVES & TIME (you should - you're limited dolts with NO SKILLS where on what you THINK is your ballcourt I blow you away easily as you TRY "forums slide bury" your defeats - doesn't matter - folks SEE it all & are LAUGHING @ you & "your kind" (lazy do nothing "ne'er-do-well" TALKERS - not doers like me).

    Angry? LMAO - How can I get ANGRY when you MAKE ME LOOK GOOD & yourselves to be just the anonymous troll do nothing WORMS you are? Please... get a life.

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly, I love it - CLASSIC (hahahaha "HELP ME MOMMY" crying for mods to help you CHUMPS ran DRY of your abused "downmodpoints" because guys like me know 2 things: You are DOLTS & LIMITED + STUPID, easily outthought & outskilled on YOUR OWN "BALLCOURT" (where I actually do GOOD things folks like & use, but losers like you? NO COMPETITION - stay the way you are - you're NOT IN MY WAY, lol, & I LOVE IT)... apk

    1. Re: Hahaha u CRY "help me MOMMY" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mod points are being used properly. You, however, are abusing anonymous posting so you can keep reposting the same spam.

  42. Re: It can't get to my Linux rig... apk by Brockmire · · Score: 0

    I'd download it, but my hosts file doesn't contain an entry for that domain. I'm sure no one else does, either. So what the fuck? Why wouldn't you post the fucking IP instead? FFS, that's your typical nonsensical magical hosts file thinking.

  43. LMAO - CRY "help me MOMMY" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahahahaha https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739888/ & I am running you DRY of your abused downmodpoints.

    * I am MAKING YOU USE THEM UP correctly & easily, you easily PLAYED microcephalic do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" MORONS... lol!

    (Don't even TRY wonder "How does APK beat the piss out of us everytime?", just don't - you're just TOO FUCKING DUMB to get the better of me!)

    Going for the "forums SLIDE burial" now? Good luck, you're DOZENS of posts away as I laugh @ "your kind" UNIDENTIFIABLE do-nothing mentally limited unskilled dolts, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You wastes of life with no skills want to "get the best of me"? DO A BETTER PROGRAM than mine that's multi-platform & works on hosts (beyond your LIMITED RANGE though, & you KNOW it, talkers)... apk

    1. Re: LMAO - CRY "help me MOMMY" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't even write your hosts file engine. You ported someone else's work.

  44. Making u CRY "Help me MOMMY", lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & THIS CLASSIC (lmao @ u + "your kind", do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" mere wannabe TALKERS & trolls behind ac posts) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739990/

    * RoTfLmAO @ u & so is ALL of /. (if not the planet) but that's "nothing new" to YOUR KIND (not-men lazy do nothings with no education or real skills) now is it? Nope... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> Trying for the "FORUMS SLIDE BURIAL" now? Of course - YOU'RE OUT OF YOUR ABUSED "downmodpoints" bullets & MOMMY ISN'T HELPING YOU (gosh, wonder why - they're sick of YOUR SHIT too pussy)... apk

    1. Re: Making u CRY "Help me MOMMY", lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you keep posting, perhaps this will become conspicuous enough for whipslash to completely ban you. One can hope...

  45. Wrong - ask Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong - ask Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes - he's seen my sourcecode & hosts it (which is even BETTER by FAR now) & I used techniques the GREAT Dr. Bruce Krell noted in his EXCELLENT BOOK "High Speed Windows Applications" - which would probably make "your kind", do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells" have a SHORT-CIRCUIT of your limited dolt brains (lol - HELP ME MOMMY classic https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739990/ )

    * Know what I LOVE about "ne'er-do-well" DO-NOTHINGS like you that harass & stalk me behind your UNIDENTIFIABLE (Oh, I can find out WHO you are like I did stupid Khyber above IF I want to put out the effort (not easy))? You waste your time...

    APK

    P.S.=> You can't beat me with downmodpoints I run you out of (HELP ME MOMMY classic above), You can't DO better work that 100's of 1,000's worldwide use as I've done MANY times - you're no competition, easily beaten ON YOUR BALLCOURT as I've done here today (as always) & IF you want to "get the best of me"? WRITE A BETTER HOSTS FILE PROGRAM (you can't - you're TOO limited)... apk

    1. Re: Wrong - ask Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you actually have no way to find out who I am, though I'd love to see you try. All bark and no bite.

    2. Re:Wrong - ask Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comes from someone who just figured out (few days ago) that it's bad idea to use StringList on performance-sensitive apps on Delphi, despite his claims of his decades of "experiences" in Delphi programming. *chuckle..*

      And use sudo for ping command on Linux. Hahhaha....

      And use GTK3 as gui toolkit on FreePascal/Lazarus on KDE system. Hihihihi....

      Who out of job for decades. Tell me why's that again? Because those companies are too stupid to hire the genius, the rockstar programmer, that is APK, right? Bwahahha... The truth is you're stupid, incompetent, and the worst part is you refuse to learn (you think you're genius, so why the fuck should you learn something, right?)

    3. Re:Wrong - ask Mr. Steven Burn of Malwarebytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, APK, me again. Not Khyber, or Zontar or Ol Olsoc or any of the other ACs who have posted so far. I'm the one who usually goes through your posts and quotes sections, like the one, below;

      IF you want to "get the best of me"? WRITE A BETTER HOSTS FILE PROGRAM (you can't - you're TOO limited)

      No thank you. Host files, these days, are a niche thing. They were more useful back about 15-20 years ago. We've been over this. They are a form of black listing and no matter how you look at it, black listing is too limited. You need to combine black and white listing with some kind of heuristics for a defence in depth.

      From a usability POV, having to launch your app to download a list of IPs to load into a host file is too primitive. Things like browser add-ons do this automatically on launch, update in the background and combine white and black listing and offer far more powerful rule creation that you can do with something like a host file.

      Writing a better hosts file program would be kind of like writing a better DOS TCP/IP driver. It's over. Done. Useful in a few niche cases and those who did that sort of thing, back in the day, aren't spamming forums about it.

      Of course, most people have more than one 'win' to crow about ...

      You can't beat me with downmodpoints

      Only you think it's a competition. You're the only one that's so insecure that you've spent nearly three decades 'fighting' people on forums so you can get a 'win' and feel like you've accomplished something. Your reputation on most of the forums you've been a member of is that of a crank. It's quite clear that you have either an untreated mental illness or difficulty.

      I can find out WHO you are

      No. You really couldn't.

  46. Brockmire please, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU are KING "ne'er-do-well" & I see "your kind" CRYING "HELP ME MOMMY" but she's not helping https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739990/

    * I really do NOT get you fools - why? I beat the SHIT out of you in skills/accomplishments + I RUN YOU DRY of your puny single "effete weapon" the abused downmod even EASILY, lol!

    (... & all you do is "troll me" like it's some 'great thing' you do? Hate to tell you this but NORMAL PEOPLE look @ FAKE NAME for FAKE LIFE FUCKS like you as what you really are: Weak scumbag shit).

    APK

    P.S.=> ... & you know it - hence your stalking & harassing me by either UNIDENTIFIABLE ac posts OR fake names for your FAKE LIVES (vs, me, a guy that builds programs folks by the 100's of 1,000's IF NOT MORE love worldwide over decades now) - want to "get the best of me"? BUILD A BETTER HOSTS FILE PROGRAM (then talk - you'll @ least look like a MAN then, vs. a BITCH that cries "HELP ME MOMMY" (see link above, lol - CLASSIC)... apk

    1. Re: Brockmire please, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! You actually think you're winning these arguments? Everyone who's reading this can easily see that you're just making personal attacks with no substance to back any of it up.

    2. Re:Brockmire please, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey APK, you can live in your mum house, but masturbating on her bad is just inappropriate, you bad bad bad APK!

    3. Re:Brockmire please, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he no longer lives there. His parents sued to kick his do nothing lazy ass out and he lost. There was even a story on /. about it a week or two back.

  47. Re: Fuck you you stalking little cunt... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tough guy keyboard warrior. Lets meet somewhere and see how long you would last against a 50 year? I'm betting at best 3 hits and you are jello.

    -geekpoet

  48. Brockmire, you'd like it... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a malwarebytes employee's server (Mr. Steven Burn, great guy & he just had a stroke (didn't deserve it, good Father to his boy too)) & soon it will be on Malwarebytes' hpHosts site too (once he's able to edit it back @ his job there)) - this one?

    Beats Windows model on TONS of fronts - I rethought a couple things is why (no more VCL GUI stringlist processing, I underestimated the messagepass overhead & went PURE non-visible stringlists (tons faster & does 2x the work in 1/2 the time)).

    Another thing I did that's "fairly outstanding" is PING minus Root in Linux (which another TROLL let me know "advanced tools" like WIRESHARK is capable of (no mean feat in C/C++ I bet it was written in, but WAY IMPOSSIBLE in Object Pascal I've seen FAIL on it (3rd party toolkits especially like synapse (when I had doubts in MY work (rare but, yes it happens) so I tried them, they fuckup too)

    + weak attempts @ piping ping itself's tty term outputs BACK into GUI via TProcess HOKEY BULLSHIT that hangs (pascal routines = weak on pipe), using RunAsRoot routines etc. said it was impossible minus Root!

    APK

    P.S.=> Bullshit on impossible, I did it, via porting Linux's OWN IP STACK CODE for ICMP into Object Pascal (f'ing nightmare but works like magic now)... apk

    1. Re:Brockmire, you'd like it... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You failed because you're stupidly incompetent.. yeah! Keep using sudo for ping, you weird person, no one else does! Hahhaha..

      Why would you need TProcess for that (ping), you stupid fuck? Hahahaha... There's even component for that (and you don't root to execute the instruction!) for decades.

      Do you know the overhead of using TProcess? Of course you don't... hahaha... Who am I talking about, it's APK. APK, an "experienced" Delphi programmer who have never profiled his applications of his decades of "experiences".

      Keep being stupid, Alex. Don't listen to anyone, mkayyy...

      We love you...
      XOXOXOXO...

  49. Big talk behind your fake name ac post, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject pusscake - you're just another DO nothing zero to your name "ne'er-do-well" self boy (former NCAA 1st string athlete for a national champ here in Lacrosse - how about YOU, creampuff wannabe nerd?)

    Well?

    ANYTIME pusscake talker... anytime.

    APK

    P.S.=> For Pete's sake, you pussies can't even do BETTER programs than I do, & you think milksop lazy jerks like YOU & "your kind" can take me down in a streetfight? LMAO - you're welcome to COME & TRY bitch... I'd end you, easily... apk

  50. Yet YOU don't show you do better, lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet YOU don't show you do better TALKER (me? I'm a doer & my work rocks & nothing like it in GUI on Linux afaik - how about YOU pussy?)

    NOTHING is what you have behind your ANONYMOUS unidentifiable pussy posts harasing me (as I LAUGH @ "your kind" do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" mere talkers & wannabe fakes).

    FACT...

    APK

    P.S.=> Ah, you're SHIT & you know it - ESPECIALLY "Help ME MOMMY" https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56739990/ as I ran you DRY of your effete easily exhausted abused downmodpoints (all you have & I'm INVULNERABLE to them in the end, lol, but you're not to TRUTH I level @ you)... apk

  51. Asus -- Using AdvancedTomato FW?? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    I have an Asus RT-N66U running Advanced Tomato.. Would it be affected with this issue???

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  52. Hahahaha whipslash TRIED & failed... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: That's RIGHT UP THERE w/ your "HELP ME MOMMY" classic LMAO https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740200/ Ask him - HE knows it, & you whimps don't even REALIZE that's the TRUTH of it (that nothing stops ME, but me) & you've really shown EVERYONE what you are, you know.

    * Man, I have to PITY "your kind", I really do... & I KNOW that "whipslash" Logan Abbott also KNOWS that IF I wished? I could crash & BURN his servers in minutes IF I wished (but I don't, I pity him humiliating him as I did years ago TRYING to 'stall me" & failing).

    APK

    P.S.=> You TRULY are, the "not-men" & TOTAL ingrates + mere talkers (not doers)... apk

    1. Re:Hahahaha whipslash TRIED & failed... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could crash & BURN his servers in minutes IF I wished (but I don't, I pity him humiliating him as I did years ago TRYING to 'stall me" & failing)

      This comes from someone who uses sudo for ping command on Linux... Hahahhaha....!

  53. No question I am with RESULTS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject You can't stop me, I've run you DRY of downmodpoints & results? My other reply to you says all https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740450/

    NOTHING defeats ME, but me & I defeat MAC restrictions w/ EASE via API level code (said to be "impossible"... lol, yea? I DO THE IMPOSSIBLE, everyday & did for decades as a coder - haven't stopped yet).

    * FACT: YOU WISH YOU WERE ME, lol...

    APK

    P.S.=> FUNNY PART IS, you COULD be, maybe better - but you WASTE TIME trying to "F" w/ me vs. learning more (your loss, enjoy the program)... apk

  54. WTF? I've owned my own home for ages... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & QUIT PROJECTING your own "StRaNgE" weird inadequacies on me ok - it gives away YOUR 'issues' you know!

    * Hilarious...

    APK

    P.S.=> I figure MOST of you PUNY unidentifiable anonymous troll whimps are adolescents - gotta be, what w/ your IMMATURE stupidities, lol, like I'm 12 yrs. old that "get to me" (they may you, but I have TAXES to pay & INSURANCES & manage just fine - maybe, one day, you will TOO if you stop being such a cowardly MILLENIAL piece of shit, lol)... apk

  55. Hypocrite much Mr. Pot calling a kettle black? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Are YOU & "your kind" (the NOT-men, lol) capable of producing better work in this area than I? See https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740070/

    ?

    * Do THAT & then, talk (via your UNIDENTIFIABLE pussy "not man" anonymous posts (which is ALL You'll EVER BE if you keep up your present ill-fated course - mark my words)).

    APK

    P.S=> Being FAT lazy & STUPID is not the key to a successful life you know yet you're doing it, lol... apk

  56. Brockmire, take a read... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PROGRAMMATIC EXCELLENCE in motion (what you might do IF you didn't waste time f'ing w/ me) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740450/ what YOU might do IF you weren't a trolling fake name for your fake life moron... lol!

    * THINK (I know, a foreign concept to YOU & "your kind" the FAKE NAME for FAKE LIVES or UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous "troll" kind (some accomplishment)) on that... & say "Satan GET THEE BEHIND ME" (you need it - you've the DEVIL on your back man).

    Your bs can't "take me down" - I'm TOO STRONG for wastes like you to do that, don't you understand that? I'll just keep GETTING STRONGER, you know (& you're helping, lol)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Believe me, I've got YOUR KIND (the "not men", lol) figured out - you HATE yourselves (don't blame you, you = idle hands are the devil's workshop in motion) & try "take it out" on me (a guy that builds some COOL STUFF folks like, even on /., & use + praise - you WISH you were me (you can't be by doing douchebag shit you do, fact))... apk

    1. Re:Brockmire, take a read... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strong person doesn't masturbate on his mum's bed!

  57. I can cite security pros saying hosts = useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: For security & added speed (no questions asked) + browser addons = either SLOWER (usermode alone starting after hosts making them REDUNDANT & USELESS for the most part + browser internal messagepassing (a mistake I made in Windows model of my code IN PART, mix of non-visible stringlist & GUI ones (overheads I underestimated in latter I avoid now)) OR less capable by FAR - care to debate that? Doubt it - I've TORN UP too many FOOLs trying that including AlmostALLAdsBlocked on their forums (which like you fools, they TRIED to "delete hide" lol - weak).

    FACT: NOTHING does as much as hosts does, for FAR less + natively, nothing for added speed/security/reliability & even anonymity (not "Bolt-on-'Moar'" ILLOGIC LOGIC bullshit) period.

    On winning?

    Hey - FACT:

    I ran you UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous fools out of your 1 "weapon" that just BOUNCES off me in the unjustifiable 'downmod' & now you're trying "forums slide burial"?

    Please - by THIS point?? Everyone's SEEN me tear you up & certainly NOT you doing better than I have... fact.

    Lastly - Ask Coren22 WHY he disappeared - he stalked me too, until I shut his ass down (had help from military folks, admittedly). Believe me, IF I want to find you? I can, & will (your kind's not worth the effort OR "marks of due" I call in).

    APK

    P.S.=> You mention the TCP/IP stack (driver)? I ripped that bitch apart for ICMP (ping) & "did the impossible" MINUS root to do this app (was hell, they refactored the HELL out of it is why, had to yank TONS of C .h & more to get to root of it (pun intended)) to find out PING itself ONLY has a MAC on it (the exe), the API is STILL CLEAN (& all Object Pascal toolkits FAIL on it too no less - but NOT ME (no way, I never do IF my name's on it - to me? Looking @ what Linux is NOW lately? It is EXACTLY that - pride of workmanship - IN FACT & I'm convinced of it now? I told my nephew (climbing HIGH @ Apple right now, proud of him, he offered me work there but my money works for ME now, NOT the other way around) on WHY Linux is going to beat Windows & Mac as I told MS Performance mgt. VP head Foredecker here this YEARS ago - it's personal craftsmenship & loving what you build (not just for pay)))... apk

    1. Re:I can cite security pros saying hosts = useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please provide citations from security professionals saying that a host file is useful;
      a) for most users
      b) on its own and
      c) in the last five years.

      Otherwise you haven't proven anything except that it's only useful for a few, niche, situations.

      For security & added speed blah blah blah

      Using your 'solution' is not faster. I have to load your software, wait for it to download a list from various sources, wait for it to modify my host file and _then_ I can open a browser and view a web site. With a browser plug-in, that all happens as I open the bdrowser. The fact that a host file resolves more quickly is true, but irrelevant. Your metric is meaningless. I'm not constrained by CPU cycles. I'm constrained by time and attention. I don't want to have to launch one program just so I can use another.

      Your 'Facts' aren't relevant. You repeat them because you a) have very poor comprehension and what appears to be a cognitive defect and b) have nothing else.

      Stop saying 'it's faster' and argue why that matters. No one is saying 'it's slower'. You're arguing a straw man.

      UNIDENTIFIABLE

      I thought you boasted you could work out who I was. If you can find out who I am, how am I unidentifiable?

      I don't downmod you. I generally don't downmod. When I moderate, I concentrate on modding up comments that are interesting, informative or insightful. I have no need to mod you down, you post at 0 because you post AC. You post AC because you'd be ignored or modded into oblivion by just about everyone because of your behaviour. You are incapable of learning the acceptable behaviour of the groups/forums that you join.

      Everyone's SEEN me tear you up

      I've posted lengthy rebuttals of your various points. You refuse to acknowledge most of them. You neither reason nor argue. You rant. You repeat the same points over and over. Then you claim 'victory' when people stop engaging you. They stop because it becomes clear that you are incapable of normal interaction; that you can't argue - all you can do is rant. If you think that's 'winning' then your life is truly more pitiable than it already seems.

      Believe me, IF I want to find you? I can, & will

      No, you can't. You really, really can't. I'll give you a hint. I'm in Sydney, Australia.
      Come over and we can catch up and talk face to face. If you want to go a couple of rounds, I'd be _more_ than happy to take you up on your various 'offers'.

      You mention the TCP/IP stack (driver)

      No, I mentioned writing one for DOS as a way of comparing relevance. That you read only what you wanted to is a sign of your general inability to communicate, functionally. Your posting on forums borders on the illiterate. I actually thought english was a second language for you for quite a long time.

    2. Re: I can cite security pros saying hosts = useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military did not aid you in acting against Coren22. That's a lie.

      You live in the US. From what I can tell, Coren22 also lives in the US.

      It would be illegal for the US military to be involved. The Posse Comitatus Act expressly forbids the US military from enforcing domestic policies, with a few exceptions. Those exceptions do not include helping you act against internet users who make to angry.

      You are lying.

      You have made a large number of violent threats recently. Your violent threats are still illegal, whether directed against someone by name, a pseudonym, or even an AC. It is extremely unlikely that you're able to carry out any of your threats against Slashdot users. However, the threats raise concerns about your state of mind and whether you are a threat to those around you. Your posts suggest that you've become increasingly deranged and possibly dangerous. Because you may be dangerous to those around you, I believe it is the right thing for me to try to ensure that you are unable to physically harm anyone. For that reason, I have been documenting your violent threats and will be providing this information to the FBI. Unlike the US military, the FBI is capable of enforcing domestic policies, and they do investigate violent threats.

      Nothing you say or do will prevent me from informing law enforcement of your violent threats. It will be up to the FBI to decide how to proceed against you.

      Don't bother replying. Nothing you say or do at this point will prevent this information from being delivered to the FBI. And it certainly is their job to investigate violent threats.

  58. Re:Big talk behind your fake name ac post, lol... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not the AC you were just speaking to, but we've chatted, before. I'm the one who tends to quote you, like below;

    former NCAA 1st string athlete for a national champ here in Lacrosse

    When was that? For how many seasons? What have you done since?

    Playing a college level team sport for 2-3 seasons, decades ago, says _nothing_ about who you are, now. It's the same thing with your software. You did one thing, exaggerated the importance and have spent decades crowing about it.

  59. Then "projectionist" (lol) STOP doing it! apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Don't project your weird issues onto me & instead LEARN how to create excellence https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740070/ as I clearly have... ok?

    * You'll feel BETTER about yourself (instead of being an UNIDENTIFIABLE "jealous JOWIE" anonymous worm you are, lol).

    APK

    P.S => I tell you all 1 thing (& you really SHOULD listen) - It's NOT easy being "World-Class" (like me) - nothing GOOD (like my work which for decades has been praised in the windows world, including by /. users) IS EASY - being a scumbag like YOU, is though, & you pay HARSHLY for it in the end... apk

    1. Re:Then "projectionist" (lol) STOP doing it! apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      World class person doesn't masturbate on her mum's bed!

  60. Uh, learn to READ dumbass... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I completely BYPASS what I suspect is merely a MAC restriction on ping executable in Linux instead using API calls I translated to Object Pascal FROM the basecode of the IP stack itself in Linux (very informative - bit TOO 'broken up' refactored imo & utter bullshit @ some points but it works on THEIR end & SURELY does on me (pats self on back)).

    APK

    P.S.=> I didn't USE TProcess pipes back to GUI controls (streams) from invisibly launching ping (would DEMAND RunAsRoot (which I did in Windows, had to to SAVE hosts to etc, I don't even need THAT now in Linux (via a "puny trick" as I call it, lol), which I also wrote up a 40 or so line routine for, works, but it is a FUCKING KLUDGE, & weak, so I blew it off) that I saw OTHERS on FreePascal forums trying - why should I FUCKUP like they did (I didn't - my stuff, as always, work like a DREAM & fast) doing bs like that? I don't but it IS possible to pipe (All *NIX's are built for that, it's why your scriptkiddie SCRIPTS work via pipes in tty term mode) but imo? THAT SHIT is for CHUMPS (like you, lol, not me - I do it PURE, & CLEAN + FAST (perfect, my name's on it, it had BETTER be))... apk

  61. What have I done since? OK samples... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows NT Magazine April 1997 "BACK OFFICE PERFORMANCE" pg 61

    (For SuperSpeed.com PAID CONTRACT (wrote SuperCache 40% performance boost) & SuperDisk finalist @ MS Tech Ed 2x in a row 2000-2002 HARDEST CATEGORY: SQLServer Performance Enhancement)

    WINDOWS MAGAZINE 1997 "Top Freeware & Shareware of the Year" issue pg 210 #1 entry

    PC-WELT FEB 1998 pg 84

    WINDOWS MAGAZINE, WINTER 1998 pg 92 MUST HAVE WARE

    PC-WELT FEB 1999 - pg 83

    CHIP Magazine 7/99 - pg 100

    GERMAN PC BOOK Data Becker "PC Aufrusten und Repairen" 2000

    HOT SHAREWARE #46 issue pg. 54 2001

    Paid for article @ PCPitstop in 2008 http://pcpitstop.com/news/winn...

    UltraDefrag64 Process Priority Control credited by lead devs of it in the programs credits section.

    APK Hosts File Engine 10++ 32/64-bit is hosted & RECOMMENDED by Malwarebytes http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    (A fraction of what I can put out: & YOU?)

    APK

    P.S.=> Want MORE? Ask... apk

    1. Re:What have I done since? OK samples... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you read?

      You boasted about your lacrosse as 'proof' of your athleticism. I'm challenging that.

      What have you done, athletically, since lacrosse? How long ago was lacrosse?

      Understand?

      Want MORE? Ask... apk

      Yes. I'd like you to read.

      ---

      *laugh* Your Pitstop article isn't a 'paid for article'. You won a cash prize.

      What's even funnier 'though is that you claim that Malwarebytes 'RECOMMENDS' your software. No they don't. They host it. Under 'Third Party Misc'. What's even funnier is they describe _your_ tool as "Small program for managing the HOSTS file ". They describe _both_ the other tools (HostsMan and HostXpert) as "A small and useful utility for managing the HOSTS file".

      That's not a recommendation, no matter how you capitalise it. Your software is not described as useful and both other utilities are. Do you understand the phrase 'damned by faint praise'? It's hilarious that you think this is a recommendation.

    2. Re:What have I done since? OK samples... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow some shit shareware lists from the 90s and early 2000s
      Not a paid for article, but a contest that you won from a more dodgy version of a wanna be Kim Komando radio show that no one can read
      A stupid trivial idea that was rejected by the developers
      A throwaway toy problem
      If that is what you hold up as your accomplishments it is a sad and pathetic list. I have better failures than that.

  62. Talker, EAT YOUR WORDS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aryeh Goretsky/ESET/NOD32: hosts = good security http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7442373&cid=49747129/

    ZD NET http://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-use-a-hosts-file-to-improve-your-internet-experience/ "Hosts files really shine by letting you block ads, spyware sites, malware sites, & tracking sites"

    Steve Gibson on hosts https://www.grc.com/sn/sn-045.htm/

    "classic Windows hosts trick to block the Coinhive or Crypto-Loot domains" - https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/a-new-player-joins-coinhive-on-the-browser-cryptojacking-scene/ - BLEEPING COMPUTER

    Oliver Day (SYMANTEC/SECURITYFOCUS) http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/491/ "Host file browsing the Web - is actually faster

    Spybot S&D add a layer of defense against trojans & other forms of malware to hosts

    Malwarebytes hpHosts hosts & RECOMMENDS my program.

    Want MORE from SANS?

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject "talker" (vs. me the doer)... apk

    1. Re:Talker, EAT YOUR WORDS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aryeh Goretsky - 2014, fails (c), recommends it as an additional layer fails (b), does not address (a).
      Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a writer, not a "Security Professional"
      Steve Gibson - 2006, fails (c), "I wouldn't recommend it for most users" fails (a)
      Bleeping Computer - not a "Security Professional", lists 'hosts' as 3rd after AV and browser add-ons
      Oliver Day - 2009, fails (c). Talks about the downside of blacklists

      Every example fails one or more of the criteria I asked for.

      You fail. And, hilariously, you think this is a 'win'.

      Even funnier, however;

      Malwarebytes does not recommend. It hosts your utility. The other two host file utilities are described as "small and useful". Yours is described as "small".

      --

      Seriously, 'though, you seem to have a reading/comprehension disability. Have you been tested for dyslexia?

  63. Time to humliate you more INFERIOR one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LeMoyne College 1984/1985 14 points in less than 2 seasons 1st string (1st season as Freshman, bulk of my points no less then) MORE than U!

    * They became a CHAMPION (after importing kids from the FABLED highschool in the USA I learned the game @, West Genesee) & I've been FORTUNATE (to have been surrounded by GREATNESS in all facets of life (except for "ne'er-do-wells" like U on /., lol who haven't done shit obviously & CANNOT COMPETE w/ the LIKES of ME on ANY front).

    Even WORLD CLASS pal of mine Todd Curry in Lacrosse said "great shot AL" when I scored on national champion for DECADES Syracuse U!

    APK

    P.S.=> What I put out is only (as I said) A FRACTION of what I can (including /.ers LIKING & USING MY WORK - how about you (again, zero from you like last reply)) - dolts like you? MAKE ME LAUGH, as you're obviously "ne'er-do-wells" & losers TRYING to "cut me down" & I just "move fast SLOWLY" cutting you to pieces in EVERY post, lol... it's just (Haven't done THIS in awhile) "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez' vs. do nothings like YOU, lol... apk

    1. Re:Time to humliate you more INFERIOR one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *wipes tears of laughter from eyes*

      You're calling someone a creampuff because you once played two seasons of lacrosse 34 years ago?

      Talk about clinging to past glories. Dear gods, that's pathetic.
      What have you done _this_ decade? How about last decade? Some gardening? Walking?

      I know people like you. They were active in their youth, maybe even athletic. They haven't trained since, but still act as though they weren't out of shape and refuse to believe that they aren't nearly as good as they were 'back in the day'.

      I pity you. I really do.

    2. Re:Time to humliate you more INFERIOR one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have you done _this_ decade? How about last decade? Some gardening? Walking?

      Masterbating on his mum's bed!

    3. Re: Time to humliate you more INFERIOR one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like watching Married With Children and listening to Al Bundy brag about his high school football prowess while working as a shoe salesman 30 years later.

  64. Tell you what, ask Steven Burn... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's a malwarebytes employee (top one, good man) IF he recommends my work (& hostsman, inferior like you,lol, BUGGY single platform windows only crap) IF he recommends my ware -> Steven Burn ok? I don't LIKE doing this making you EAT YOUR WORDS, but you're going to, lol... I have it from his forums where "ne'er-do-well" /. TROLL do nothings (like you, lol) tried this crap YEARS ago vs. me (only to FAIL eating your words as you will now, lol) - it's ALL "your kind" KNOWS how to do (fail & lose + be zeros, lmao)... fact.

    * You are ridiculous & as I said: Want SANS to 2nd me even MORE? Ask... & ye SHALL receive... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> What blows my MIND is I don't HAVE to try 'win' vs. do-nothing nobody LOSERS like you, "ne'er-do-well" since you DEFEAT YOURSELVES for me (as you haven't got SQUAT to show but your cheap talk & nothing to SHOW for yourselves, lol)... apk

    1. Re:Tell you what, ask Steven Burn... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You failed to provide a single reference from a security professional in the last five years that recommended hosts files, alone, for most users.
      You failed to even read/comprehend the challenge and posted unrelated links.
      You failed to understand that there is no 'RECOMMENDATION' on the link you provide.
      You failed to understand that when there are three options, and two are called 'useful' and one isn't, that's actually pretty damning.

      You have some kind of reading/comprehension disorder. You can't even understand basic english.

      You say 'ask Steven Burns'. No. Your claim. Provide proof. Show me a quote from the last five years where he recommends using hosts files, alone, for most people.

      You can't because your 'solution' is outdated, useful in niche situations only and is limited enough that it's only really useful as an add-on or afterthought - certainly not enough on it's own.

      *laugh* You haven't made me eat my words. You can't even demonstrate that you've read them

      You fail. Utterly. And yet you think you're winning.

      Your utility isn't called 'useful' by Malwarebytes, but Hostman and HostXpert is. Your utility can't even manage to be called 'useful' by Malwarebytes. *laugh* It's just 'small'.

      Good night, APK.
      I'm sure you'll skim this and ignore most of it - it's pretty embarrassing, after all.

      'small'.

  65. When ISP forces their Fibre Router On You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do I scan my Huawei HG8245H for this VPNfilter malware? Is there an online or offline tool to scan a router?

    Before you tell me to upgrade its firmware, please note that Huawei is a typical Chinese company. They sell the router and tell you to f**k off. My Mauritian ISP is the typical ISP. They will tell me "VPN malware what?" This is what you get for living in a 3rd world island. Your best chance is to do it yourself.

  66. LOL! I don't need to know WHO you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: When I know WHAT you are as the "ne'er-do-well" do-nothing ALL talk zero you proved yourself to be behind anonymous posts!

    * RoTfLmAo... no shit (spit my Miller HighLife I'm sipping DISMANTLING worms JUST LIKE YOU, & of course, YOU too, easily).

    APK

    P.S.=> Talker, build something BETTER than this from YOUR OWN CODE as I did (no "OpenSORES" thieving like "your kind" TRIES to pass of as "their work" (pitiful & end up BUGGY as shit unlike MY work no bugs to date since 2012 to now)) here ok https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740070/

    Hell, you CAN'T & that's really ALL I HAVE TO DO to shit on you (I just let you & "your kind" fake talkers do it to themselves & it works EVERYTIME getting you all "hot & bothered" you SUCK & you know it, lol).. apk

  67. Dear "HELP ME MOMMY" hypocrite (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's your reason for being unable to produce wares even /. users LIKE & USE like I do (now in Linux) https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740070/

    * OH, I know (& so does everyone else to YOUR public dismay & humiliation which your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts only PROVE for me all the more)... you're a waste of life UNDEREDUCATED all cheap "talk" imbecile.

    APK

    P.S.=> It has to SUCK to be a total DOUCHE loser like you, lol - but you DO have 1 somewhat redeeming quality (lmao) - CHUMP do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells" like YOU do MAKE ME look GOOD @ your wasted life expense (hahahahaha)... apk

  68. World class me does things your kind can't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & proof wannabe /. TROLLS like u wish u could do but undereducated waste of life like u, can't https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12199712&cid=56740070/ lol, fact!

    * As I've always said SCRIPT KIDDIE "sysadmins" (failures that couldn't MAKE IT as coders, pure truth, mere USERS w/ a better password that DEPEND on guys like ME to make what schmucks like you MERELY USE,lol - fact, in your scriptkiddie scripts you use works GUYS LIKE ME MAKE for inadequate imbeciles like YOU to USE weaklings) - let's see YOU "fake it 'till you make it" FAKE FUCKS do better... ain't happenin' & makes me LAUGH!

    (Same w/ you "webdouches" that TRY "play programmer" lol, when ALL YOU ARE is text formatters & picture pasters, lol!)

    APK

    P.S.=> TRUER WORDS were NEVER SPOKEN on /. - but TRUTH around here? Gets the LOSERS I noted above all "hot & bothered" (of course, truth of their DUNCE LIVES upsets them - especially when PUBLICLY exposted, lol)... apk

  69. You FAIL to provide anything @ all, lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SANS ("A related approach to the DNS issue is to create a hosts file on each system that sends requests for spyware to some place else. Both Ramu and an anonymous reader have suggested this" hosts by myself & RAMU right @ START of "malware explosion" mid 2005 on) https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di...

    SANS (lists using hosts blocks) https://isc.sans.edu/forums/diary/Botnet+malware+defense/4138/

    BLOCKING (What hosts do) BEFORE SCANNING @ SANS https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di...

    APK

    P.S.=> I also asked IF you wanted those too, funny you didn't reply so NOW you EAT YOUR WORDS, lol... apk

    1. Re:You FAIL to provide anything @ all, lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fail

      Link 1. Over a decade old. Considers using a hosts file on its own is vulnerable and recommends "That's why this approach is best used in conjunction with a DNS blackhole and other items in this list." Can you even read? Fails (c) and (b)

      Link 2. This is hilarious. This link doesn't talk about using 'hosts file' it talks about a "Host Intrusion Protection System". This has nothing to do with hosts files! MASSIVE FAIL. You're functionally illiterate, aren't you?

      Link 3. _Anything_ could be 'blocking' before scanning. A proxy. DNS. Firewall. This doesn't recommend hosts at all. ANOTHER MASSIVE FAIL

      You don't even understand the links you provide. You can't read, can you? Do you have a learning disability? Have you been tested for dyslexia?

      Malwarebytes describes APK's software as "small" and APK thinks that's a 'RECOMMENDATION'

    2. Re:You FAIL to provide anything @ all, lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG... APK refers himself as 3rd person. Yet again... You ain't foolin' nobody, homieee....

      Love you

      XOXOXOXO...

  70. REDUCED TO LYING ABOUT ME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REDUCED TO LYING ABOUT ME + LIBELING ME? Prove your statement - let's SEE your proof - I own my own home & am a good tax paying citizen (unlike you little boy living w/ your mommy projecting it).

    APK

    P.S.=> That's when I know I destroyed you UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous worms - when you start your lies, all you'll ever have for your FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIFE lives in "registered 'lusernames'" on websites too... apk

    1. Re:REDUCED TO LYING ABOUT ME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS on that (and everything you said). You inherited your mother's house, you didn't buy it with your own money, because you have.. nothing! Zero! Zip! Nil!

      I also pay tax on cig I just bought, that doesn't tell us anything.

      Do you think you can fool us, Alexander Peter Kowalski? Try again!

  71. Were YOU an NCAA 1st string athlete ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Answer the question UNIDENTIFIABLE do-nothing "ne'er-do-well" that you are: Were YOU an NCAA 1st string athlete ever? No. If not prove it.

    APK

    P.S.=> I workout w/ weights (but can't benchpress anymore as I blew my rotator cuff out in 2013) - & I also have done things in the ART & SCIENCE of computing a DUNCE like YOU will NEVER ever manage, lol... apk

    1. Re:Were YOU an NCAA 1st string athlete ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I workout w/ weights

      Sure you do. Free or machine?

      So what do you squat? Deadlift?

      as I blew my rotator cuff out in 2013

      *laughing* That's because you're soft. I snapped my ACL, tore up the meniscus. Had the knee rebuilt. Was told that without the meniscus that knee would have less stability. So I built up muscle to support the knee. I still run, have spent most of the last decade practising martial arts, playing soccer, touch-football, cycling, parkour etc. Took 18 months of solid physio and remedial exercise but I'm not ending up like those sad old farts who reminisce about how good they used to be.

      Injuries are things you work to overcome. Not excuses.

      Go re-live your glory days you soft has-been and stop talking smack you can't back up.

    2. Re:Were YOU an NCAA 1st string athlete ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See subject: I ask you questions you AVOID you do nothing "ne'er-do-well" bs artist - were U an NCAA 1st string athlete? No obviously, lol! Have U done ANYTHING others speak well of (in my case, our /. registered user PEERS also) in esteemed trade shows, commercially sold software from certified MS partners, books/newspapers/trade magazines/cd-rom distros AS I HAVE?? LOL - Oh HELL no you LAZY brainless imbecile INFERIOR unidentifiable 'anonymous' puss ass... RoTfLmao!

      HAS BEEN ME is SUPERIOR to a "never was OR will be" in YOU & "your kind" (the INFERIOR ONES, lol).

      * TRUER WORDS WERE NEVER SPOKEN ON /. & you KNOW it (proving it for me & all else reading to see, constantly, lol).

      (Keep "chattering" dolt & LET'S SEE PROOF OF YOUR CHATTER BULLSHIT (you don't have it, lol) & I love it - & keep avoiding FAIR questions I ask of you & you RUN from mine, "forrest", lol!)

      APK

      P.S.=> What's it LIKE being a do-nothing "ne'er-do-well' NOBODY who I can easily outdo, outthink, outsmart & "OUT" in yourself?? LMAO... apk

    3. Re:Were YOU an NCAA 1st string athlete ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sunshine, I didn't play lacrosse for two seasons. 34 years ago. You brought that up trying to prove you weren't a 'creampuff'.

      You work with weights?Can't press because you injured yourself last decade? What do you squat?
      C'mon. You're the one making the boasts. Back it up.

      Keep re-living the glory days when you weren't soft and may have been more relevant.
      You can't post anything from the last five years from a "security professional" that says host files, on their own, are useful for most people and you can't post anything athletic from the last three decades.

      Fail

      I'll post proof when I start spamming forums with exaggerated claims of my own importance. Until then, I don't need to be a tailor to tell that the emperor has no clothes.

      Get tested for dyslexia. You're functionally illiterate.

  72. More than YOU ever did & only partial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More than YOU ever did & only partial of what I can put out (I kept saying "want more? ask") Show us you did more, earlier & better than I!

    * LOL - I KNOW that YOU can't!

    APK

    P.S.=> Why can't you show you did anything GOOD ever? It's because YOU are a "ne'er-do-well" DO NOTHING zero waste of life, RoTfLmAo & you KNOW it + prove it w/ you being unable to show ANYTHING of value from you others thought is good (want statements from /.ers on the quality of my work in my hosts program too? ASK)... apk

  73. What've YOU done better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What've YOU done better? Lets see it & PROOF of it from behind your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous "ne'er-do-well" do nothing postings (lmao).

    APK

    P.S.=> You really ARE do-nothings & it makes me laugh so I use it against you EVERY SINGLE TIME as I know you're LIFELONG milksop flops & it works (especially when YOU BRING IT UP to try "belittle" me, ME, who has done things shitbags like YOU & "Your kind" NEVER ever will, lol!)... apk

  74. It can't get to my Linux rig... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK Hosts File Engine 2.0++ 64-bit for Linux h t t p : / / a p k . i t - m a t e . c o . u k / A P K H o s t s F i l e E n g i n e F o r L i n u x . z i p (remove spaces between characters & download).

    Created in FreePascal/Lazarus 1.8.2 using GTK3 on OpenGL 3.1 via KDE Plasma desktop on Kubuntu 18.04 plus patches.

    (Yields more security/speed/reliability/anonymity vs. any SINGLE solution (99% of threats = hostnames vs. IP address (that most firewalls use)) more efficiently/FASTER + NATIVELY 4 less!)

    Vs. "Bolt on 'MoAr' illogic-logic" competitors slowing you, hosts speed you up 2 ways (adblocks + hardcodes u spend most time @) vs. competition loaded w/ bugs (DNS/AntiVir) + their overheads (messagepass ('souled-out' to advertiser addons) + filtering drivers) & their complexity leads to exploitation.

    APK

    P.S.=> Enjoy - it's much better vs. the Windows model on many fronts (speed & efficiency, mostly (plus a new "merge" feature))... apk

  75. MORE APK SPAM DETECTED. MOD DOWN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times are you going to repost this garbage? If you're as successful as you claim, don't you have anything better to do than repost this spam?

    1. Re:MORE APK SPAM DETECTED. MOD DOWN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times are you going to repost this garbage?

      Probably until creimer starts pumping APK's ass full of cum on a regular basis again.

  76. LOL, more "HELP ME MOMMY" from you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL, more "HELP ME MOMMY" from you? Aw, I ran you DRY of your abused "downmodpoints" again & I win as usual, you unidentifiable anonymous "ne'er-do-well" DO-NOTHING ZERO loser...

    * Your kind (not-men)? Wastes of LIFE!

    (... & very, Very, VERY EASY to get the better of + get a rise outta you...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Go AWAY "InFeRiOr" damaged goods one - your type's DISGUSTING (it's why women don't WANT you, lol)... apk

  77. Hahahaha: Ran you DRY of "downmodpoints" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: LMAO @ u "helpless henry" do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells" as always by NULLIFYING ur 1 effete 'weapon': Unjustifiable downmods - why? To show how WEAK "your kind", the 'not-men' REALLY are... & you know it!

    * EVERYONE KNOWS IT as you show it... hahahaha!

    APK

    P.S.=> Grovel BITCH - kneel to me... apk

  78. Yet it IS recommended by security pros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & it's FAR MORE than a useless "ne'er-do-well" DO nothing like "your kind" + you have - LOADS more & you know it + prove it.

    * Thank you for making ME look GREAT & yourselves by comparison? Well - you know - mere "ne'er-do-wells" do nothings, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> All your bullshit doesn't matter when YOU YOURSELF don't do SQUAT, lol... loser! apk

  79. Do registered /.ers say this of your work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017

    (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon February 11 2016

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015

    I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015

    I do use APK's host file on all my systems at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    *Want MORE?

    Ask...

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject: You don't HAVE a damn thing to show for yourself & you KNOW it (we all do of "your kind")... apk

    1. Re:Do registered /.ers say this of your work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every one of those is over a decade old. Not. Relevant.

      And because you don't provide links, we can't see context.

      Watch;

      I realise that I've been an obnoxious asshole and I'm going to see someone about getting some help by APK June 8 2018

      See? That's the same quality as the crap you just posted.

      Are you capable of providing something from the last 5 years, from a "security professional" that says that hosts files, on their own, are suitable for most users?
      If not, then you admit that hosts files are (a) outdated, (b) not secure on their own and (c) niche and surpassed by better solutions for most people.

      You're an illiterate, has-been coasting on past 'glory'.

      Fail

      Do registered Slashdot users say this of your work

      More people have told you that your work is crap in this thread than you can quote from the last two decades

      FFS. Be consistent.

      Please get tested for dyslexia. You're functionally illiterate.

      Malwarebytes describes APK's software as "small" and APK thinks that's a 'RECOMMENDATION'

    2. Re: Do registered /.ers say this of your work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've researched some of those "testimonials" and I can vouch that the quotes are, indeed, accurate. And that's the only good news for APK.

      Most of those are tiny snippets that have been taken out of context. The comments often include criticisms of his software to go along with the positive portions of the comments that he quotes. Some of those comments also criticize his behavior, which is on display here for all to see.

      Many of those comments were also posted in storied where APK has engaged in lengthy flame wars and, in some cases, has completely hijacked the discussion. Some of them contain the same comment reposted repeatedly to circumvent moderation of his spam, just like in this article.

      If APK posted links, the entirety of the comments and the discussions would undermine most of his claims. He's good at posting links repeatedly, but linking to those comments would actually be embarrassing to him.

    3. Re: Do registered /.ers say this of your work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know. I've searched for some of them and managed to track down about 1/2. I linked to them a while back in another thread (actually, a couple of years ago IIRC).

      As you say, what he has quoted is accurate, but often taken out of context. I don't think he actually has links. I think he has a file with anything he thinks supports his position. Lots of cut and paste.

      The thing is, there are claims he could make that are more reasonable and more easily attested. It's the exaggeration and demand for accolades that's off

      Looking at criteria in DSM IV, there's an element of clinical narcissism to his behaviour. The grandiose claims and exaggerated self-importance are what we most often associate with narcissism, but the root is a deep seated inadequacy that simply cannot accept any criticism - internal or external - and that can manifest as rage or the sort of denial, dismissal and outright ignoring of anything that might contradict the fragile self-image that they try to maintain. The origin is usually a failure to properly develop empathy and APKs inability to read social cues and/or model appropriate behaviour is typical of narcissists.

      His need to 'win' arguments; his swift claiming of victory and his constant claim that people think he's good all seem a desperate attempt to find 'narcissistic supply' - an external validation to try and fill the internal void.

      He could 'just' be 'spectrum' - the lack of social modelling matches, but the grandiosity, hyper-sensitivity to criticism and living on past achievements doesn't fit.

      On top of all of that, there really does seem to be some kind of reading impairment - his comprehension is apalling and he seems to skim and use keywords to extract meaning. He misses more than he picks up and just glosses over when he's called on it. His inability to express himself except in the bizarre sentence fragments he uses seems to be worse these days than in older posts on things like Ars. I'm not sure if he's getting worse, or lazier.

      I argue because a) even narcissists can learn to model behaviour given enough time and b) he seems to need it. He settles down after a flame war or so and we don't hear from him for weeks or months.

      He's been especially aggressive in this exchange, 'though. I wonder if there's something more than usually 'wrong'.

  80. Time doesn't change facts, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & again - I put out MORE in my favor than U or "ur kind" (not men do nothing "ne'er-do-wells") will ever have OR do, lol & u know it.

    * That's ANOTHER FACT You can't bs about - you can TRY fool yourself but you can't fool me, OR anyone else since you do ZERO by comparison to myself...

    APK

    P.S.=> Say whatever you want but FACTS are in what I put out that YOU CANNOT DENY & facts about you are true too, lol (& you obviously don't like it HIDING behind your UNIDENTIFIABLE do nothing ZERO "ne'er-do-well" posts - LMAO!)... apk

  81. Folks I quote said EXACTLY what I quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Folks I quote said EXACTLY what I quote IN PRAISE of my efforts & you can't change it w/ your JEALOUS JOWIE bullshit, "ne'er-do-well" lol!

    * FACT...

    APK

    P.S.=> You WISH you were me but "your kind" HIDING behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts 'trolling' (lol, huge accomplishment when I RUN YOU DRY of "downmodpoints" too) can NEVER ever be & you KNOW it proving it constantly, lmao... apk

    1. Re:Folks I quote said EXACTLY what I quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your quotes were researched here: https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12042539&cid=56520379. That thread contains replies that link to the stories containing some of those quotes. Some of the comments were also posted in full. What you are doing is called selective omission. Therefore I'll raise the question: why should I or anyone else trust software written by someone as disingenuous as you?

      Also, from the same story that the previous link leads to, there's another comment documenting your 15+ year history of abuse on forums and via email: https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12042539&cid=56520443. There are links to pages that document and display some of your bad behavior from the early 2000s.

      You love to dismiss comments you don't like by attacking the credibility of anonymous users. There's a good reason that most of the replies to you are anonymous: you have a history of repeatedly attacking any logged-in users who criticize you or your software. It really doesn't matter whether the comments are posted by someone who is logged in or someone who is posting anonymously. What matters is the substance of the post, whether it is credible and verifiable. The research and criticisms posted in those comments contain links that support their claims.

      Your selective omission is dishonest. Your constant dodging of questions is dishonest. Why would I trust someone to secure my computer when they demonstrate so much dishonesty?

      And for good measure, I'll post links to the stories that contain some of those testimonials:
      https://science.slashdot.org/story/16/02/11/1926214/interviews-ask-author-and-programmer-andy-nicholls-about-r

      I've never tried to belittle your work, I've flat out said it's good; I was merely pointing out that it also builds upon the work of others. That in no way takes away from the work you have done. What I have, however, done is to point out that you and your behavior patterns (for example, the way you lash out at people over a joke) are toxic, and that reflects on your work. Take the advice and, as you once told me, quit putting words in my mouth.

      https://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/08/10/136226/study-ad-blocker-use-jumps-41-percent

      You shouldn't respond to APK guy with your actual account. Now he is going to stalk you. On a related note, his hosts program is actually pretty good, however his methods of forum hijacking are a little eh.

      https://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/09/24/1919238/mozilla-fixed-a-14-year-old-bug-in-firefox-now-adblock-plus-uses-less-memory

      The worst is, his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources. Too bad APK doesn't get that different people have different needs and there's no such thing as "one size fits all".

      https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/02/16/192232/cloudflare-puts-pirate-sites-on-new-ip-addresses-avoids-cogent-blockade

      I'm fairly certain that I've been downmodded for giving your software a fair shot (and, in fact, posting an overall favorable impression of it), rather than the content of that informal review.

      Your software is just fine - well written, functional. Your claims that it's practically the cur

  82. You don't DO "squat" talker (prove it)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U don't DO "squat" (prove it) - let's see THAT "miracle" take place from an UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous bs artist in yourself, lol... come on pusscake!

    * You'll RUN "Forrest" - it's ALL "your kind" does (zero accomplishments, lots of "talk" but ZERO proof thereof of ANY of your bs lies).

    (QUESTION: Do you ENJOY me making others laugh their asses off @ u @ YOUR expense?)

    Has been ME HAS been - you'll NEVER EVEN BE THAT (lmao) - truth! You project what U R - IRRELEVANT, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> Bitch, face it - You WISH you were me but "your kind" can't be HIDING like you do UNIDENTIFIABLE pusscake 'WEEZIL', lol - & you KNOW it, lmao... apk

    1. Re:You don't DO "squat" talker (prove it)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you squat? C'mon. You claim to work with weights, but have an 'injury' that prevents you from pressing. So what do you squat?

      Exaggerated claim. Like so much else.

      You talk a lot of smack for a soft has-been.

      You claim you can find out who I am. Prove it.
      You claim you're not a creampuff. Prove it.

      Malwarebytes calls APKs software a 'small program', but calls similar software 'small, useful utilities' and APK thinks this is a 'RECOMMENDATION'

      You're 'small' APK. Even Malwarebytes agrees.

  83. Thanks for admiting what I quote's accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll give you that on folks liking + USING my work (even /.ers, stiffest critics I've ever seen, no joke) - can't deny facts & no "suberfuge wording" pseudo ARBITRARY "interpretations change facts.

    * It's what KILLS my 'courageous' (lol) UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous "detractors"/"naysayers" ALONG w/ my asking 1 simple question (the KILLER):

    WHAT HAVE YOU DONE BETTER?

    (Then, "Silence REIGNS in heaven" iirc quoting John the revelator OR complete fail attempts @ TWISTING what you yourself admit is accurate...)

    APK

    P.S.=> At least YOU'RE somewhat fair - I'll give you that & thanks - what am I TRYING to get these UNIDENTIFIABLE do-nothings to do AS THEY ATTACK ME (& fail, & first as always, I just hit them with truth of them & they FLIP out, lol - truth hurts, always does)? GET THEM TO DO SOMETHING, anything worthy vs. WASTING their obviously WASTED do-nothing chatterbox lives (a noble effort on my part imo, but probably impossible (can't make crocodiles eagles))... apk

  84. Other trolls even ADMIT I'm accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & what I quote is EXACTLY what was said in MY favor of others liking & using my work praising it. No changing that fact. Your purely 'arbitrary interpretation' attempts to twist it fail: Folks like & use my work (not YOUR non-existent HOTAIRWARE, lol).

    * FACTS are facts... no changing it.

    APK

    P.S.=> I didn't BOTHER read your "JEALOUS JOWIE" miles long rant when all I have to do is point out folks said what they said that my work's GOOD & they USE + LIKE it (may not like ME that much, but then, I'm not here to win your 'highschool popularity contests' - I'm here to just plain WIN vs. UNIDENTIFIABLE jealous anonymous do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells" & I always do via facts/truth & getting you to RUN DRY of your abused "downmodpoints" (lol, too easy, ALWAYS WORKS (especially truth of "your kind", do nothings, lol) & gets a RISE outta ya, lol!))... apk

    1. Re:Other trolls even ADMIT I'm accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted some of the full comments that you've extracted quotes from. I included links to the stores that they appeared in. Anyone can follow those links, use the search function in their browser, and verify that those are, indeed, full quotes. That is most certainly not arbitrary interpretation. Anyone can read those quotes and objectively note that there are some fairly harsh criticisms of your behavior or the outlandish claims you make about your software. The rest of your post is simply a train of ad hominem logical fallacies that aren't even worth addressing.

  85. Forrest (lol) prove anything about you... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & "RUN, Forrest: run..." & keep "hiding" behind your 'courageous' (lol, not) UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous pussy posts!

    * You're doing WONDERS for my position & destroying yourself FOR ME (Thanks)...

    APK

    P.S.=> ... & you KNOW it - lol: On myself I can EASILY ("has been" as you call me or not, @ least I WAS & you? Never WAS or WILL BE, LMAO - full of HOTAIR you can't back (don't you understand how STUPID you look? You do)... apk

    1. Re:Forrest (lol) prove anything about you... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like all narcissists when you can't disprove a criticism, you ignore it.

      You claim to 'work with weights' but refuse to answer how much you squat.
      You claim that Malwarebytes "RECOMMENDS" your software, but they actually recommend both other utilities over yours
      You claim that "software professionals" think a hosts file is the solution, but all your links are old and out of date, are 'op-ed' pieces from blogs, suggest a hosts file is only part of a solution and/or don't recommend it for everyone.

      Your main claim to glory is a tool that does little more than could be achieved with a text editor, your claim to athleticism rests on two seasons of college level sport over three decades ago.

      You can't write a proper sentence, you can't read and seem to have some kind of learning or reading disorder and your arguments are full of ad hominems, logical fallacies and links to things you clearly haven't read or understood.

      And you think I'm destroying myself?

      You know nothing about me, despite your claims at being able to track me down and I have shown every claim you make is an exaggeration.
      I'm not the only one. There's another 3-4 people on this thread, alone, who are all saying much the same thing.

      Goodbye, APK.
      Until next time.

  86. Question (answer it)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & answer it: Did registered /.ers say they like + use my work? They certainly do NOT say that of your hotairware,

    * ANSWER THAT QUESTION, lol... you won't OR spout MORE ridiculous bs as always (but nothing to show YOU have done like it earlier or better in the eyes of others on MANY levels).

    (It is going to be a PLEASURE seeing you EAT (your words))

    APK

    P.S.=> I love watching you gyrate & DANCE to MY tune - it's SO easy to get you to do, & VERY entertaining (manipulating do-nothing JEALOUS JOWIES always is, lol - I actually PITY YOU, as you don't seem to see how BAD you look due to your wasted life, lol!)... apk

    1. Re:Question (answer it)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In response to whether registered Slashdot users say they like and use your work, the answer is yes, they did. I don't think anyone is disputing that.

      I'm not in the business of producing software for general use. I do some software development, but it's for use by me and other scientists in my field to conduct research. I have had my research published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. I wouldn't judge you based on your number of peer-reviewed publications, because you do a different type of work. That would be unfair, just like you questioning people here about whether they've produced software that other Slashdot users actually use.

      Regarding your software and the reviews, a lot of users have remarked that your software is effective at producing a hosts file that improves security and generally works well. I don't think that's being disputed. I will give you credit in that regard, too.

      However, you also overstate the security that a hosts file can provide. Other users have said that, and I wholeheartedly agree with their assessment. You also become far too angry at any perceived criticism, no matter how fair or justified that criticism is. Your reactions are beyond being over the top when you're threatening physical violence against people. Many of the reviews give you credit for your hosts file engine while also pointing out that you overstate the security that hosts files can provide and that your bouts of anger are unhelpful and unwarranted.

      I'll admit that you are sometimes are on the receiving end of awful comments, such as the AC reply to this classy post you made: https://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12148450&cid=56667926. You would do yourself a lot of favors if you were as classy all the time as you were in the post I just linked to. That AC's comment was far over the line, and you didn't deserve the criticism there. You would do well to take the high road more often.

  87. Sorry, not my Mom's house... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was never my mother's house (she's still alive in Europe) & it was paid for - do YOU own a home? Prove it. I can easily. You can't anonymous zero.

    (Me by comparison? I've also UPGRADED THE HELL OUT OF IT (great writeoff too) better than money in the pay you shit in interest bank).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're SO completely PITIFUL, lol - I've owned & managed my own home for more than a decade - have you? THIS is gonna be fun to watch (seeing you 'dance' unable to prove anything about yourself (least of all, anything good - why? You ARE NO GOOD & you know it + prove it, constantly (you're unworthy of even INHERITING a damn thing as I suspect your own relatives KNOW you're shit (as you do & prove about yourself, lol)))... apk

  88. LOL! You're projecting & RUNNING Forrest... ap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the matter? Can't prove a DAMN thing about yourself you ask me to do & I do but you?? RUN... you only prove you're shit constantly (makes me laugh & YOU CAN BET everyone else is laughing @ YOU & "your kind", the unidentifiable DO NOTHING zero "ne'er-do-well" - but, that's NOTHING NEW to you, now is it? Hence WHY you 'hide' & LIE + HATE guys like me (when the TRUTH is you really HATE yourselves & everyone SEES it w/ you proving it constantly, hiding (you can't hide from your wasted life self though, lol)).

    * Hahahahahahaha... thank you.

    APK

    P.S.=> Photon torpedos of TRUTH & FACT have utterly dismantled your deceitful romulan warbird hiding behind UNIDENTIFIABLE cloaking devices posts (lol, I am watching Star Trek TOS "Balance of Terror" where a guy after MY OWN HEART & lifestyle in Capt. Kirk rips apart WORMS HIDING, like you)... apk

  89. LOL! Retard, LEARN TO READ... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stringlist objects ARE what got me better performance (vs. using VCL GUI lists combined w/ StringList objects in Win ver) in Linux STUPID!

    You're probably the SAME GOOFBALL who said "use Application.ProcessMessages" to me on updating screens in LOOPS (which SLOWS YOU DOWN DUMBASS, using ListBox1.Update/ListBox1.Refresh does it FASTER minus losing time)

    &

    I DO NOT USE sudo FOR PING (I bypass the MAC restriction on ping & ping itself in Linux, using the TCP/IP stack code ported to Object Pascal instead YOU DUMBASS).

    * You do NOT know WTF you're even TALKING ABOUT fuckbrain - I explained it 10x @ least in posts of mine WHERE I GOT A PERFORMANCE BOOST & HOW but your illiterate DULL BRAIN stated EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE... lol!

    (Lastly, I haven't HAD to work for ANYONE but MYSELF in a decade++ - how about YOU, "wageslave"? I doubt you even HAVE A JOB!)

    APK

    P.S.=> You truly ARE a DUMB BASTARD... apk

  90. Thanks & what do I overstate here? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & thanks for admitting /.ers like + use my ware & that hosts = effective security (+ more speed/reliabililty) + that you SEE I am stalked/attacked/harassed.

    (It's advertisers & webmasters - losing money & IF they wouldn't track/infect/slow us? I'd never have put the program out & also INFERIOR competitors (they're all inferior doing less using more)).

    FACT: Hosts do more for LESS (complexity, resource use, exploits) vs. ANY single so-called 'competitor' (DNS/AntiVir/Firewalls/addons) - natively. No "Bolt-On-'MoAr'" ILLOGIC LOGIC!

    APK

    P.S=> IF attacked NO "Classy". I'm NOT here to win a "highschool popularity contest" (EASILY RIGGED via multiple sockpuppets) - I'm here to WIN & via facts + superior FREE programs helping others (nothing like it in GUI on Linux afaik) - & IF reason/logic fails vs. buttsore trolls I take down in tech debate? STALKING/HARASSING ME is NOT their right... apk