Slashdot Mirror
US Once Again Boasts the World's Fastest Supercomputer (zdnet.com)
The US Department of Energy on Friday unveiled Summit, a supercomputer capable of performing 200 quadrillion calculations per second, or 200 petaflops. Its performance should put it at the top of the list of the world's fastest supercomputers, which is currently dominated by China. From a report (thanks to reader cb_abq for the tip): Summit, housed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), was built for AI. IBM designed a new heterogeneous architecture for Summit, which combines IBM POWER9 CPUs with Nvidia GPUs. It has approximately 4,600 nodes, with six Nvidia Volta Tensor Core GPUs per node -- that's more than 27,000. The last US supercomputer to top the list of the world's fastest was Titan, in 2012. ORNL, which houses Titan as well, says Summit will deliver more than five times the computational performance of Titan's 18,688 nodes.
Have gnu, will travel.
Actually Linux wins again, the Summit runs Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.7.
Thank God for Commander of Cheese, Predisent Trump.
Ima wanna do the IMOGENE COCABERRY
You want lobster? heh, i'm thinking IMOGENE COCABERRY!
Will it mine PedoPesos?
USA USA USA!
This is kinda silly. The fastest supercomputer is going to be whomever has built the newest one. Moore's law is slowing down a tiny bit, but it's still going. Someone spending $100,000,000 on a supercomputer today is going to have a slower machine than someone building one for the same amount in a year's time.
My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
But it still can't beat a human at tic-tac-toe.
If you had access to a computer this powerful, what would you do with it? just asking...
"Knowing everything doesn't help..."
Bitcoin mining? Yep I thought you could. :)
What good is a supercomputer if it can't earn some moola!? :D
If you had access to a computer this powerful, what would you do with it? just asking...
. . . in other news . . . the DoE has just announced that they own 51% of the Bitcoin Universe . . .
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
From the fine article:
But to be fair, the article continues, we had 100,000 of the fastest blue screens from Windows' false
starts ever witnessed by humans. Quite the sight!
CAP === 'wideband' <-- It's not even a word!
There are several very useful for humanity topics, requiring lots of calculations: ;)
- fusion, whether for tokamacs or stellarators
- proteins for medicine
- properties of alloys
- PI (to see if Carl Sagan was joking or was he on to something
Anyone who thinks the USA is down and out and can't win at tech needs to refactor their bullshit. The Chinese should stick to making cheap flip flops and Christmas lights for Wal-Mart. Ha-fucking-Ha!
Pron.
I'd rent it out. Sell processing time on it. How else would one pay the power bills? You can rent a lot of processing power on Amazon, but you can't rent a supercomputer-grade high performance interconnect between your nodes. Not from them, anyway.
I'd offer a special service for non-profit customers: They can pay power costs only, but then they only get to use idle resources. Commercial-rate customers take priority - got to pay the bills somehow.
How is this any different than a data center of the same scale? I'm not even sure it has a higher bisection bandwidth.
Okay—I am sure it will have way lower latency between nodes at any equivalent bandwidth tier. But unless you're planning to aggressively exploit that, it's just your garden variety datacenter make more expensive and less flexible.
1977 Heinz Ketchup Commercial "Anticipation"
Heck of a lot of money, Brownie, for less ketchup.
What kind of massive multiplayer game could you facilitate on these?
300,000 person FPS to replicate Normandy landing in WW2? Landing craft, infantry, planes, intense physics and all?
How about making a Beowulf cluster of those? Oh, what a minute. ;-/
LoB
"Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
My Intel desktop has the performance of a 90's supercomputer. Strange to think the best technology available to the world's top scientists in the 90’s now sits on my desk
my karma will be here long after I'm gone
With the possible exception of some recent developments by China, all supercomputers use CPUs made by Intel and AMD. American companies.
Essentially, ALL supercomputers are American. All these other countries are just buying American designed components and putting them together.
"The reason our super computer exists and is so successful is because of me," Trump told reporters, "great confidence in the moves that my Administration is making".
"The Fake News Media barely mentions the fact I made this Super Computer and America just hit another New Record and that business in the U.S. is booming...but the people know!" he tweeted. "Can you imagine if 'O' was president and had this computer — would be biggest story on earth! Slashdot would be on fire!"
He also commented on Apple and Linux users:
"We're rounding 'em up in a very humane way, in a very nice way. And they're going to be happy because they want to run Windows. And, by the way, I know it doesn't sound nice. But not everything is nice."
Titan was ~27K TFlop/s peak and ~17K TFlop/s max at Nov/2017. 27*5 is not 200 PFlop/s...
The supercomputers are measured using Linpack. This is a simple benchmark and can be done efficiently by large number of dumb cores in parallel. Though some workloads mimic Linpack, most workloads don't, so Linpack is not a good measure of supercomputer speed. Another benchmark which is gaining momentum nowadays is HPCG (see http://www.hpcg-benchmark.org/ ) which measures more broader performance and it shows quite a bit different picture. The top is still the 2011 K Computer. Some NEC computers which don't make in top500 are ranked in thirties. The Chinese computer is current top500 leader but it is ranked 5th on HPCG, even behind their own other computer which is 1/3rd the speed on Linpack.
BTW, a fun detail from the article that should really have been included in the summary:
James Hack, director of ORNL's National Center for Computational Sciences
Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
You can rent a lot of processing power on Amazon, but you can't rent a supercomputer-grade high performance interconnect between your nodes. Not from them, anyway.
https://aws.amazon.com/hpc/
Ssshhhiiiiittttt. Don't put it past the Gov to pull a stunt like that.
Step 1. Print money via the Treasury in addition to spending tax payer money.
Step 2. Build supercomputer
Step 3. Mine Crypto Currency (Bitcoin)
Step 4. Sell said Crypto Currency.
Step 5. Recycle the money back into the Gov.
Life is not for the lazy.
America needs all this computing power to process all the data they collect on their citizens and citizens of other countries.
The bandwidth in Amazon's HPC nodes is sort of ok compared to some cluster configurations, but the latency still leaves a fair bit to be desired. Last I tested, 6 months ago, the AWS HPC networking still had a 6 times higher latency on real world tasks I tested it with, compared to Infiniband equipped nodes(depending on the node hardware in question, GPU's might even talk over Infiniband to another GPU inside the node, if it's on another PCIe root complex, because it's faster, and I didn't receive an answer to that question from Amazon when I asked)
probably
Rent it to the IRS and DoJ.
Ensure every cyber currency in the USA was interacted with using the big gov super computer.
When the cyber criminals want to cash out their digital currency collection, the US gov is ready to help with that transaction.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
I went out to *BSD's grave on Decoration Day, out at the old forgotten cemetery by the dark woods beyond the edge of town. There within olfactory distance of the municipal treatment plant you will find *BSD final resting place.
*BSD's tombstone was overgrown with weeds and moss so I pulled the tangled mess off the marker and cleaned it up the best I could. My melancholy thoughts pondered that this indeed was *BSDs figurative charnel house of which so many have spoken
Nothing is so sad as an untended grave, a loved one now forgotten. The short sad life of a doomed and fated OS makes us realize there but for the grace of God go all of us.
I planted some marigolds that I had found discarded behind Bud's Garden Center. Hopefully they will bring a modicum of cheer to that God forsaken plot. I only hope that the torpid colored boy who carelessly mows the cemetery doesn't slice them down, and in so doing, mirror *BSD own fate against deaths irresistible scythe.
Funny how things work out. Linux now runs the world's fastest computers, while *BSD lies moldering within its forgotten grave. Let the barren silence of *BSD's tomb be a mute reminder that hubris and braggadocio were no match when the Angel of Death's bleak umbra fell upon *BSD.
? You don't seem to be the only one with this misconception. I see several posts below that echo you. Note that this supercomputer temporarily replaces a Chinese supercomputer at the top of the list that did not use American processors. So, prior to this one, the world leading supercomputer did not use American processors.
Furthermore, this one is not an Intel or AMD machine. Still American companies, but each node in this one has 2 IBM Power9s and 6 NVIDIA V100 Voltas. In fact, the GPUs are the real compute power in most of the really big supercomputers these days and lots of them run NVIDIA GPUs.
The Power9s appear to be made in Malta, NY, but the NVIDIA V100s, arguably the real compute power, are made by TSMC in Taiwan. This machine might be designed in America, but it appears to be mostly made in Taiwan.
These processors are made to work together. The Power9 has native support for the NVIDIA's NVLink connections. The Power9's 16GB of HBM2 memory maintains cache coherency with the Voltas, essentially acting as an L3 cache for the Voltas.
The core count in this system is mind-blowing. The Power9s are apparently the version with 24 cores each. So 24*2*4600 = 220,800 SMT4 cores. The Voltas are hard to quantify. Each Volta has 84 Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs). By that count, there are 84*6*4600 = 2,318,400 SMs. This is where the real supercomputing occurs. But each SM in turn contains 64 FP32 cores, 64 INT32 cores, 32 FP64 cores, 8 Tensor Cores, and 4 texture units. I'm not going to even bother doing the math. Suffice it to say that this machine has already broken the exaflop barrier in problems that didn't require FP64 precision.
The transistor count is also astounding. The Voltas have 21.1 billion transistors each. The Power9s have 8 billion. ((21.1*6)+(8*2)) * 4600 = 655.96 trillion transistors just in terms of processors. We've come a long way since the Intel 4004's 2300 transistors less than 50 years ago.
IBM POWER and PowerPC get short shrift.
We can only imagine how many fewer datacenters we'd have if these pure RISC implementations with superior multiprocessing capability were used instead of x86-64 emulating crusty old instruction sets.
Kriston
Azure is competing in this space along with AWS.
I am shocked that these firms don't yet offer to bill by CPU usage. I come from the end of the age when CPU cycles were charged per contract and were planned using budgets. It wasn't for rationing but to help pay for the resources.
Kriston
I saw an article that said the nVidia GPUs were V100 Tesla's, not Voltas.
Who cares if all the companies are in the US?
Every single one of them manufacture their products in China
No, the Power9 is fabbed in New York.
It is, isn't it?
Not that it makes much difference (or that it makes it more of a word), but; https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wideband
First used in 1931.
Crysis framerate?
The story has focused so far on how the US got the #1 crown back. But the real story is about how we can now run the fastest and largest AI jobs. Because this IBM supercomputer has 27K+ GPUs, it can run massive deep learning jobs. IBM has been very focused on this deep learning space with their TensorFlow-based open-source PowerAI software offering.
That is not "superscalar". That is "modular". A different word with a different meaning.
it states it is running Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) version 7.4. System User Guide - Overview - OS
My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.