Access To Major Airport's Security System Offered on Dark Web for $10 (axios.com)
Researchers at McAfee found remote access to a major airport's security system available on the dark web for $10. From a report: The hacked access came from an online market for remote desktop protocol (RDP) accounts, which sell access to hacked accounts in all kinds of systems. "There's a lot of discussion about sophisticated nation-state attacks, but this was a really cheap way anyone could get access to something," Raj Samani, chief scientist at McAfee, told Axios. The RDP market isn't typically about purchasing access to systems to actually use the systems. Instead, buyers pay between $3 and $19 for access to machines based on bandwidth. Those systems are often used for their resources rather than their information.
$10? For $5 I can tell about updateing there systems.
Call me "not surprised" after passing umpteen machines in the security line with unprotected USB slots. One good boot and...
$10? For $5 I can tell about updateing there systems.
$10? For $5 I can tell about updating their systems.
WTH!! FTFY!
You dummy! You could have charged him $5 for fixing his post!
Not sure if you're joking, but here goes:
If you don't distribute your software outside of your company (e.g. by publishing it on a webpage for the public to download, or selling it to some other companies), then you do not need to give away the source code. That is written in the GPL.
Anything compiled with GCC or clang compiler can still be kept under a closed-source license, you do not need to give the source code away.
Your lawyer is wrong.
Source: I am a lawyer.
For 5 dollars can we buy you spelling and grammar lessons?
Here's what interests me. If this data is available for $10, then we're given a feel for how many customers are needed to buy it to make any serious cash.
Presuming that all the state actors buy the data (and I do so presume... if they don't, they're being really, really stupid), that's a couple hundred right there. Then there are corporations, perhaps... can't imagine there would be many taking the risk, but... and the individual crazies.
Doesn't seem all that economically beneficial to the seller.
Someone else have a different take?
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
Do I really need to explain this at this point?
You are only obligated to give publish your code if you distribute to other people, for something in-house, you don't.
Well, I'm afraid your lawyer is an idiot who doesn't understand the GPL, because the GPL sure as hell doesn't say that. What you wrote is 100% false.
If you guys are paying him for legal advice which is patently false, you should find a better lawyer.
So either you, your lawyer, or both of you are a little too clueless about the GPL to be credible, because pretty much nothing you wrote is actually true.
If either a consultant or a lawyer tells you code compiled with clang has to be open sourced ... they're incompetent to be giving you that advice. From the sounds of it, neither you nor the lawyer know anything about the GPL.
They're, they're. Calm down, know knead too charge. The Internet provides these services four free.
$10? For $5 I can tell about updateing there systems.
$10? For $5 I can tell about updating their systems.
WTH!! FTFY!
Don't be too proud of yourself either. Tell may occur without an overt (visible) indirect object only with wh-noun clauses or phrases. Tell must have an overt indirect object in all other contexts.
Update of a simple typo is annoying and boring. "FTFY" is useful only when the meaning of the sentence is changed by the typo! Develop courtesy toward others. Lack of spelling is common to many genius brains, as well as non-native english writers.
Sheesh, people trying to increase their post count...
I do mean on effective security, not all that worthless "compliance" bullshit.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
For about $3.50 I can tell about selling grammar correction services.
The headline should read: "Airports leave remote desktop open so people can remotely log in and control air planes"
This has absolutely nothing to do with "scary hackers"