Slashdot Mirror
Gawker.com Sold To Bleacher Report Co-Founder Bryan Goldberg In Bankruptcy Auction (cnn.com)
The now-dormant news and gossip website Gawker.com was sold on Thursday to Bryan Goldberg, the founder of Bustle and co-founder of Bleacher Report. According to CNN, the site sold for less than $1.5 million. From the report: Goldberg founded the sports website Bleacher Report along with three other people in 2005; in 2012, they sold it to Turner, which like CNN is owned by AT&T. He launched Bustle, a website focused on women's issues, in 2013. Goldberg addressed the Gawker sale in a Bustle internal email on Thursday, saying the site will be acquired "under a new holding company, separate from Bustle."
"You are probably wondering what happens next," he said in the email, which was obtained by CNN. "The short is this -- not much. We have no immediate plans to re-launch Gawker. For now, things will stay as they are. I'm very excited about the possibilities for the future of Gawker. I will share more in the months ahead." The sale includes an archive of hundreds of thousands of Gawker stories and social media accounts affiliated with the site. Gawker Media was sold to Univision in 2016 for $135 million and renamed Gizmodo Media Group after the company declared bankruptcy, "the result of a legal assault waged by the former pro wrestler Hulk Hogan that was secretly subsidized by Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, a longtime Gawker adversary," reports CNN.
"You are probably wondering what happens next," he said in the email, which was obtained by CNN. "The short is this -- not much. We have no immediate plans to re-launch Gawker. For now, things will stay as they are. I'm very excited about the possibilities for the future of Gawker. I will share more in the months ahead." The sale includes an archive of hundreds of thousands of Gawker stories and social media accounts affiliated with the site. Gawker Media was sold to Univision in 2016 for $135 million and renamed Gizmodo Media Group after the company declared bankruptcy, "the result of a legal assault waged by the former pro wrestler Hulk Hogan that was secretly subsidized by Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, a longtime Gawker adversary," reports CNN.
You're forgetting the part where Gawker refused to remove a private sex video that was leaked. The site wasn't exactly a bastion for reporting standards.
I figured it get bought up by a revenge-porn site.
I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
No, it was the result of Gawker publishing Hogan's sex tape against his will, then ignoring a judge who ordered them to take it down, then publishing an article gloating about how they were ignoring the judge, then - when it went to trial again - telling the court that they'd happily publish a sex tape featuring a five year old. These guys were scum and they committed legal suicide - it was not inflicted upon them by Thiel even though every single story Slashdot publishes on this subject tries to spin it this way.
The various websites associated with Gawker are so terrible it is comical.
Whether it's The Root with its articles which foment racially-based hatred, or Jezebel with "relationship advice" which comes from people who should be held as in-patients in a mental health facility, the whole mess is a waste of electrons.
I suppose Gawker is good for keeping idiot SJWs busy at night, though. That may be its single redeeming feature.
I know you're hoping that people eventually will stop remembering the shit Gawker did to get themselves sued, and instead believe your headcanon where they were a poor victim, if you keep repeating it often enough. Stop it. You're pathetic.
You forgot to sign this post as APK. There's no longer any doubt that you're doing this spamming. No one wants these posts, plus they firmly establish that you're a racist. There are some who justify some of your behavior as the product of mental health issues. However, mental health issues are not grounds to justify your racism. These posts remove any doubt as to whether you're an asshole. You no longer deserve to be dealt with in good faith. I hope that whoever is impersonating you never stops. Fuck you.
At this point, I'm fairly convinced that APK's posts are some sort of code-speak like spies use. They're barely coherent ramblings, but that could just be him being crazy right? I don't think so. Notice the way he uses the capital words. I've seen plenty of examples of encoded messages and they look almost identical to the way APK writes. APK is command and control activating some type of weird sleeper agents or passing messages to the koreans or who knows what. Def a spy, confirmed.
Well put, See Kim K. And TMZ has more reporters than the Times covering the courts. Why, because they have the bucks.
Don't forget to sign these posts, APK.
Occasionally doing some good in the world doesn't justify all of the terrible things some one has done as well. I don't suspect you'd let off someone who mugged a bunch of people at knife point just because they used some of the ill gotten gains to feed some of the area homeless. The only tragedy in all of this is that a person apparently needs a wealthy person to bankroll their court case in order to have a chance of getting justice.
Gawker was a shitty place for shitty people. The muck was to make click bait money and anything approaching actual journalism was likely an accident. It's almost certain they only went after Thiel due to his political leanings, not because they care about shady business. The number of their former staffers that showed up on the Shitty Media Men list says a lot about them. You might have decided to give them a pass because they appeared to espouse your beliefs, but they were horrible people who realized that they could get away with being horrible people as long as they told people like you what you wanted to hear.
Comparing Gawker to Sinclair says a lot more about you than it does Gawker. Gain some perspective and I think you'll see that nothing was lost.
Remember Upton Sinclair's Jungle? That's the kind of journalism we just lost.
Ironically, Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" was written to be a workers-rights labor-justice piece, but it was taken up by the middle class as a 'Health Code' cleanliness issue.
And let's not let go of the reality that Gawker thought they were going to make a mint crushing a 'little guy' who couldn't defeat them (Hulk Hogan) and didn't know he had a deep pockets backer. How many other victims did they have on the list to make money by attacking?
It's just semi-algorithmic crapflooding. You see a pattern for a reason.
You do know what muckraking is, in respect to journalism, right? Calling any journalist a muckraker is a compliment.
For what it's worth, Gawker did do muckraking from time to time, so you're right even though you meant something completely different. Despite everyone's desire to depict Gawker as the worst thing ever, it had both ups and downs: it was the first publication, for example, to investigate and report on what Harvey Weinstein was doing to aspiring actresses.
Bizarrely, the thing that lead to its death (no, not the Hogan sex tape, if Gawker hadn't published that Thiel would still have killed it using the strategy he pursued) was actually part of an attack on homophobia in Silicon Valley. It didn't reveal anything that wasn't already widely known, but it was inconvenient for Thiel.
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
Yeah...it seems Payboy/Hustler etc had some of the best journalism in the 80's. Perhaps porn will save us after all. I'm being serious. Myanmar-Facebook certainly is not helping.
I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
"they were horrible people who realized that they could get away with being horrible people as long as they told people like you what you wanted to hear. '
Fox / CNN / Facebook ....I'm sure others can insert more.
I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
What about...
So you agree 100% with the quoted statement, I see.
Do you think them proudly proclaiming their willingness to publish sex tapes of 5 year old being raped might have had something to do with their downfall? Or them believing they are above the law when acting as hypocrites?
You are correct. Thiel still would have killed it using his strategy of funding legal cases of the people Gawker had wronged, knowing full well that Gawker was so horrible and vile as to hang themselves if given even an inch of rope. It might not have been Hogan. It could've been the next poor schmuck Gawker decided to make an easy buck off by destroying their privacy and acting illegally.
The thing that led to Gawkers death was the immoral and abhorrent actions of the people who worked at Gawker.
So I suppose you say the same of Infowars, PV, etc.? Yeah, I'm not expecting much.
there's nothing terrible about it.
Wrong.
This is how the sausage is made.
And people don't like it and won't support it anymore. People are losing interest in sleazy gossip stories. Well, more progressive people anyway. Maybe you're one of them dinosaurs who still read them, like those conservative dinosaurs who still listen to Alex Jones or Fox News or other fake news that operate on sensationalism and spin.
Gawker gets a story, the public gets some juicy gossip. Everybody wins.
Nope, not everybody wins. Again, people - the public - are not as interested in gossip. They got tired of Republicans freaking over Clinton's sex life decades ago, and they're tired of Democrats freaking over Trump's today. Again, maybe you're some old fart still clinging to old (dated) values, but the world is moving on.
And now he's pretty much free to do whatever the hell he wants without anybody to call him out on it. But I'm sure that'll be just fine, right?
Well, you can open your own wallet and pay for some of that real journalism to call him out. Modern technology is making it easier for independent journalists to do their own thing: set up a patreon, get connected to social media, your smart phone having capability to record videos live from almost anywhere you go searching for news, etc
That is, if you really do care about real journalism. Something tells me you're one of the consumers of that gossip you defend.
is now legal assault. Modern media is retarded.
So instead of blaming gawker for being scum you blame Thiel for playing the game correctly?
The old "investigative journalism is under attack" canard being pulled out one last time for Gawker. Congratulations silvergun, you're an even bigger scumbag than we realized
The number of their former staffers that showed up on the Shitty Media Men list [wordpress.com] says a lot about them.
That list seems to be based on an open document allowing anonymous edits and zero fact-checking. I'm sure some of them have actual accusers who've publicly stated such, but a lot of the information is pretty shady and sounds like (my friend said this guy did this).
**You can edit anonymously by logging out of your gmail.** Please never name an accuser, and please never share this document with a man. Please don’t remove highlights or names.
Apparently men aren't allowed to report on sexual harassment they've witnessed?
And Sinclair is right wing propaganda. Gawker is muckracking journalism that often brings to light the abuses of our ruling class. There's no comparison. I'd take Gawker any day of any week and so should you if you value freedom.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/