FCC Vote Likely Dooms Sinclair-Tribune Merger (engadget.com)
FCC commissioners unanimously voted on a Hearing Designation Order (HDO) to send the proposed sale of Tribune Media properties to Sinclair to a judge, where the merger is expected to cease. Engadget reports: Earlier this week, FCC chairman Ajit Pai raised "serious concerns" about Sinclair's selloff of 21 stations it had proposed in order to remain under station ownership limits post-merger. Had Sinclair declined to sell off some stations, its 173 broadcast stations in 81 markets, combined with Tribune's 42 stations in 33 markets would reach 72 percent of U.S. TV households. The FCC's National TV Ownership rule "does not limit the number of TV stations a single entity may own nationwide so long as the station group collectively reaches no more than 39 percent of all U.S. TV households." But the rule is more flexible for stations that broadcast using UHF frequencies. Pai, who has been accused of aiding the merger by relaxing the ownership regulations, said Monday that Sinclair's plan would allow the company "to control those stations in practice, even if not in name, in violation of the law." He noted that, "When the FCC confronts disputed issues like these, the Communications Act does not allow it to approve a transaction."
Oh wow, yeah! It's the feeling of the federal government actually doing a good thing. It feels like this hasn't happened in quite some time.
I hope it's the start of a trend, but I have my doubts.
bad news for abc fox?
to our democracy...
you lost, piss off!
Maybe the executives at Comcast and AT&T figured out that a Sinclair-Tribune merger might end up competing with them for consumer eyeball time?
> Ajit Pai
Don't trust that cunt, and Sinclair is in bed with the GOP. Do you really think they will push them over a cliff?
FCC chairman received a fresh bag of money - another day another attempt to deplatform.
Iâ(TM)ve discussed media topics with politicians before and they have a singular motivation. If their advertising platform can be compromised they will spring into action. Thus, if Sinclair threatens to hold too much dominance in a single market then it could impact their reelection.
Sounds like someone missed a kickback payment...
Huge middle finger to you, Sinclair. May you rot in hell.
Pai opposes Net Neutrality because it concentrates control of the internet in a government bureaucracy. He opposes this merger because it concentrates control of the press in a corporate bureaucracy. This is utterly consistent. Back in the late 1800s, there was a name for people who opposed concentrations of power in large institutions. They were called Progressives.
First Pai is doing everything he can to help the merger go forward, and now this happens.
I'm curious as to what has changed. I have great difficulty believing that Pai had a sudden outbreak of common sense.