Slashdot Mirror


Toronto Created More Tech Jobs Than San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle, and Washington Combined Last Year (bloomberg.com)

Toronto's tech scene is so hot the city created more jobs than the San Francisco Bay area, Seattle and Washington, D.C., combined last year, while leapfrogging New York in a ranking of "talent markets." From a report: Toronto was the fastest-growing tech-jobs market in 2017, according to CBRE Group's latest annual survey, released Tuesday. The city saw 28,900 tech jobs created, 14 percent more than in 2016, for a total of more than 241,000 workers, up 52 percent over the past five years, CBRE said. Downtown, tech accounted for more than a third of demand for office space. Canada's biggest city took fourth place in "tech talent," a broad measure of competitiveness, pushing New York down a notch and coming in just after the Bay Area, Seattle and the U.S. capital. CBRE ranked 50 markets across North America, using measures such as talent supply, concentration, education and cost as well as outlooks for job and rent growth for both offices and apartments. The real estate services firm cited some 5 million technology workers in the U.S. and more than 830,000 in Canada, across all sectors.

158 comments

  1. Forst poost - sorry by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    How aboot that, eh, y'hosers!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Forst poost - sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take off, eh!

    2. Re:Forst poost - sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya?

      Well now you have Islamic Fascists running around shooting the place up.

  2. Housing by captaindomon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When the median house price in San Francisco is over $1.6m, using the 1/3rds rule, you need to be making $533k in salary to realistically own a home there. People are starting to realize you can live on an acre of horse property, with an eight bedroom mansion, in most of the rest of the country and still have money left over to feed the horses for the same amount. And the startup talent in SF is also mostly becoming kids that think they know how to be successful because they have a cool idea for an app, with no business or technology training or experience...

    --
    Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    1. Re: Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also everyone shits on the street in San Fran

    2. Re: Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And needles. Don't forget the needles.

      San Francisco is turning into a literal shithole.

    3. Re:Housing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      People are starting to realize you can live on an acre of horse property

      Good luck trying to find horse property in Toronto.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to research a bit how much the houses/condos are in the Toronto area (GTA)....

    5. Re: Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's so whacky and interesting

    6. Re:Housing by keltor · · Score: 2

      From what I've seen, Toronto's housing prices aren't actually much better than SF. Average home price is like $1m. Average home price in SF is only $1.35m. The Bay as a whole is more in line with other urban places at $825k NYC is $680k, but that's the entire city. Manhattan is $1.35m, but Brooklyn is only $788k (and all the tech people I know live here.) Seattle is $765k. But for sure some of the smaller tech centers have better prices, though many of those have sky rocketed in the last 10 years. Even Oakland County, Michigan has gone up a lot.

    7. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When the median house price in San Francisco is over $1.6m, using the 1/3rds rule, you need to be making $533k in salary to realistically own a home there. People are starting to realize you can live on an acre of horse property, with an eight bedroom mansion, in most of the rest of the country and still have money left over to feed the horses for the same amount.

      However finding a job that pays even 1/6th of that salary in a state where you can get such a property is another challenge.

    8. Re:Housing by byteherder · · Score: 1

      The 1/3rds rule is stupid. If you do the math, you will find that you can a $1.6m house on 250K salary.

      A quick look at the numbers.
      Purchase price $1.6m - $320K down payment (20%), $1.28m financed (80%).
      $1.28m mortgage, 4% int, Payment = $6,111/mo.
      Monthly payments should not exceed 30% of your income.
      Income = $6,111*12mo/.30 = $244,440

      Math is your friend

    9. Re:Housing by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Want to know the difference between Toronto and SF? The average person in SF makes nearly $60k/year(converted) more then the average person in Toronto. The average housing price in Toronto is $1.58m as well. On top of that, your average taxes(all combined) in Ontario is around 43-45% of your yearly income.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Housing by xevioso · · Score: 1

      But I don't wan't to live on an acre of horse property. I also don't care about owning a home. I live and rent in San Francisco, and have for 20 years. Yeah, it's very expensive, but there are things I have near my place I cna't find anywhere else. I live in a mostly Russian/Chinese neighborhood with 4 Russian delis, 4 large Asian supermarkets, ~10 sushi restaurants, 4 schools, parks, a Polish deli, 3 Indian restaurants, a soul food place, a tiki bar, multiple churches, synagogues, Thai, Korean, Cajun, Filipino, Vietnamese, Taiwanese restaurants, all within a few blocks of my home. If I am missing something for a meal that I'm making, I go right arounf the corner to one of 4-5 bodegas we have within a block or two to get what I need.

      So yeah, I pay a premium for this, and have to put up with a lot of stuff folks who live in the country don't have to. But I choose to, and I love it.

    11. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, only the ultra-rich can afford to own an urban home in 21st century North America.

    12. Re:Housing by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Average rent for a 900sqft housing in Toronto: $1,501 USD per month (source). Average rent for same thing in San Francisco: $3,620 (source). So, uh, yeah, I'm gonna go ahead and say Toronto's a fair bit cheaper. Also, if you want to buy, I'm finding median prices in Toronto of more like $835k versus $1,600k in SF (not sure if the former is CAD or USD, but USD makes sense for both).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    13. Re:Housing by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      You can easily argue that a 30 yr mortgage is not a sensible choice. I often wonder why I can buy a $80k truck and pay it off in seven years at $1000 a month but that type of loan is not available for real estate. They smack you with 100k in interest and amortize that in with the price of the home (80,000 + 100,000) over 360 payments or whatever. Perhaps that simple loan is available? Why aren't people using it?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    14. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      add taxes and insurance to said payment at the very least... also at 250K... how did you ever manage to save 320k for down payment.also good luck finding a bank to give you a 1.2 mil loan on a 250K income.

    15. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can definitely get a lower term loan and reduce the interest you pay on the life of loan. your 1000 example may be subsidized by the car company, a 1000 dollar 30 yr house payments is more like a 140k house, a 10 yr loan for 80k could be same...

    16. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of these jobs are meaningless and create no real value?

    17. Re:Housing by ArcticBunny · · Score: 0

      and you should do a comparison of what you are getting for 800k vs 1.6M. I think the house in T.O will be a lot nicer. Also if you go outside of T.O the prices will drop. Waterloo where there are a lot of tech jobs, housing is half that of T.O

    18. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much every mortgage lender has 10, 15, and 20 year products on their rate sheet. Most will quote 25 if you ask, but it's usually at the same interest rate as 30 year loans.

      Moreover, you can always pay an N year loan using an N-x (x > 0) year schedule, giving you the equivalent of an N-x year loan with the flexibility to drop back to an N year payment as needed. The downside is that the interest rate is for the N year loan, but you still get much of the interest savings of the N-x year loan. As long as x is reasonable, say 10 for a 30 year loan and 5 for the others, this is an okay tradeoff.

    19. Re:Housing by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      And your taxes in SF on that kind of income top out at 33% federal, plus 10% state, plus sales tax, and doesn't include health insurance. The tax difference is negligible compared apples to apples.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    20. Re:Housing by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      You can get a Ten Year Fixed Mortgage.

      Additionally, you can get a 15, 20, 25 year mortgage, and pay extra every month, without penalty, which goes to principle and gets you out quicker.

      People aren't using it, because for the most part, Mortgages tend to be "cheap money", with interest deductible on taxes, and interest much lower than most other types of loans. I would suggest to you, that if you have ANY debt at all, converting it into a Mortgage and stop over extending yourself. It is a great way to "force savings".

      Many people can't afford the lifestyle they've chosen. All those $5 Lattes add up to real money.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    21. Re:Housing by byteherder · · Score: 1

      How do you save up for a 20% down payment for any mortgage?

      If you are making 60k, you can buy a $400k house with a $80k down payment.
      The percentages work out to be the same.

    22. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does this 1/3rds rule work?

      Certainly not Toronto. Definitely not Vancouver.

      Not even Calgary and Edmonton, which are probably the most affordable somewhat major cities in Canada due to higher incomes, lower taxes, and much lower home prices.

    23. Re:Housing by jbengt · · Score: 1

      People are starting to realize you can live on an acre of horse property, with an eight bedroom mansion, in most of the rest of the country . . .

      Around where I live, you need at least 10 acres to legally stable a horse on your property.

    24. Re:Housing by jbengt · · Score: 1

      I often wonder why I can buy a $80k truck and pay it off in seven years at $1000 a month but that type of loan is not available for real estate,

      That type of loan is definitely available for real estate, if you can afford it. I got a ten year loan when I bought my second house and paid it off in about seven years, and that's when interest rates were a little higher than now.

    25. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The maximum salary in Toronto is 80k.....so yes, go ahead and enjoy the silence.

    26. Re:Housing by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      According to this February article from the CBC, the average price of a detached home in Toronto is Feb. 2018 was $1,283,981 CAD. The internet tells me this is roughly $983K USD.

      So, I question that this current tech boom in Toronto has anything to do with cheap and available housing. (Since, you know, like most urban professionals, the first thing I am looking for in a house in 2018 is an acre of horse property.)

    27. Re:Housing by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It'll all come crashing down once Trump ends the Fed.

    28. Re: Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking about CEOs and investors.

    29. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's going to happen when the middle-class escapes to the burbs so they don't have to see non-white people.

    30. Re:Housing by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      You can easily argue that a 30 yr mortgage is not a sensible choice. I often wonder why I can buy a $80k truck and pay it off in seven years at $1000 a month but that type of loan is not available for real estate. They smack you with 100k in interest and amortize that in with the price of the home (80,000 + 100,000) over 360 payments or whatever. Perhaps that simple loan is available? Why aren't people using it?

      People aren't using it because they can get a mortgage at 4-5% and investment returns of 7-10%. If you get the largest mortgage you can and instead invest the money you didn't put towards the down payment, the returns will almost always cover the extra interest.

    31. Re: Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The burbs in and around the outskirts of the Greater Houston Area has the most diverse ethnic population in all the US. If you want to see larger concentrations of Chinese, Indians (Asia), Koreans, Japanese,etc, look no further than Sugarland and Katy

    32. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All those $5 Lattes add up to real money.

      But it's pumpkin spice! How else can I enjoy myself after yoga in my yoga pants?

    33. Re:Housing by gordguide · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, Toronto's housing prices aren't actually much better than SF. Average home price is like $1m. Average home price in SF is only $1.35m. The Bay as a whole is more in line with other urban places at $825k

      NYC is $680k, but that's the entire city. Manhattan is $1.35m, but Brooklyn is only $788k (and all the tech people I know live here.) Seattle is $765k.

      But for sure some of the smaller tech centers have better prices, though many of those have sky rocketed in the last 10 years. Even Oakland County, Michigan has gone up a lot.

      Not quite. As of June 2018 the average selling price of a home in Toronto (according to the Toronto Real Estate Board) was $C $807,871 which is equal to (at today's exchange rate, which hasn't changed much over the last two years) $US 631,218. So less than half the average in SF if we assume your number for that market is correct.

    34. Re:Housing by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Toronto sales tax is 13%, whereas Cali is still sub-10%.

      A lot of the US vs Canada argument is that "Canadians pay slightly more taxes and gets a lot more services". Funny thing is, both left and right agree on this. Both sides want to get what we pay for. The difference is, the left wants to fix this by bringing our services up to the standards that we're already paying for. The right wants to reduce our taxes and keep existing service levels. And both ignore the fact that our giant global military presence is why we manage to pay more and get less.

    35. Re:Housing by gordguide · · Score: 2

      Want to know the difference between Toronto and SF? The average person in SF makes nearly $60k/year(converted) more then the average person in Toronto. The average housing price in Toronto is $1.58m as well. On top of that, your average taxes(all combined) in Ontario is around 43-45% of your yearly income.

      Well have to use January 2018 numbers here, since it's the most recent with the housing type breakdown I could quickly find (first Google hit, CBC News). 416 Area Code. July 25 Exchange Rate.

      Detached home $C $1,283,981 [$US 1,003,219]
      Semi-Detached home $C $936,623 [$US 731,816]
      Townhome $C 712,186 [$US 556,456]
      Condominium $C $543,279 [$US 424,483]

    36. Re:Housing by gordguide · · Score: 1

      And your taxes in SF on that kind of income top out at 33% federal, plus 10% state, plus sales tax, and doesn't include health insurance. The tax difference is negligible compared apples to apples.

      Canada has a lower Federal income tax rate on it's highest bracket than the US.* However a simple tax rate is virtually useless when it comes to determining actual tax paid so the comparison is of limited value. Presented simply as a FYI.

      With regard to housing, in the US you can deduct the interest portion of your mortgage. Not so in Canada, however there are no Capital Gains on the sale of your home, meaning you can take 100% of your equity and apply it to a new mortgage (or do what many do and retire to a low-cost area and spend the kid's inheritance. Or not ... no Estate Taxes either).

      * -----
      Unmarried used as it's the generally highest rates; highest tax bracket cited; Federal only:

      Canada: Net income after deductions: more than $205,841: $47,670 plus 33% of the portion above $205,841 (Highest Bracket)

      US: Net income after deductions: $$191,651 to $416,700: $46,637.72 plus 33% of that portion above $191,651 (Similar to Canada's Highest Bracket)

      Net income after deductions: $418,401 or more: $120,903.17 plus 39.6% on that portion above $416,651 (US Highest Bracket)

    37. Re:Housing by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      In America the first 250k$ in net on a home sale is not taxed. IIRC provided you lived in it for the last 2 years. So many people move into investment homes for the last 2 years before selling them.

      The actual # might have been inflation adjusted, haven't looked it up recently.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    38. Re:Housing by captaindomon · · Score: 1

      Lol ok, point taken.

      --
      Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
    39. Re:Housing by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      A /.er in yoga pants. Thanks for the nightmares you fuckwit.

      Maybe if I chug a handle of Vodka, my long term memory will shutdown before the image is burned in. Gotta go.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    40. Re: Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, $5 lattes don't add up to real money.

      If you drank one **every day of your frickin' life**, at the end of the year, you would be out $1825.

      For a more reasonable 4 lattes a week, it's a little over $1000.

      Are you going to be able to buy that house or car or save for retirement with that amount of savings?

      It doesn't amount to shit. You need a better paying job.

    41. Re:Housing by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      As someone above pointed out, they don't really work out to be the same. That's because you're not considering cost of living.

      If my income went up $100k right now, I wouldn't have anything to do with that money but invest it, save it, or waste it. If I wanted a house, it would be trivial to save up $300k for a $1.5m house. 3 years and done. At my current salary and cost of living expenses, it would take me about a decade.

      Your example of someone making $60k and trying to save up $80k thus doesn't compare to someone making $250k saving up for $320k. More than likely the person making $60k can maybe scrape together $5-$10k/year, while the person making $250k can probably manage closer to $100k, depending on their lifestyle.

      Another way to look at it is what it would take to save up a quarter of the down payment:

      For the $80k guy, that's $20k. In one year, that would drop them down to $40k in spendable income for the year.
      For the $320k guy, that's $80k. In one year it would drop them down to "only" $170k to live on.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    42. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I've seen, Toronto's housing prices aren't actually much better than SF.

      For semi- and full-detached houses, you are correct. But there is a ridiculous amount of condo construction going on. Young people are generally living downtown, but if you want 2+ bedrooms, you generally have to go to the bedroom communities. Commuter rail isn't awesome, but it's pretty good, so non-driving is actually a not-bad option.

      However, you general sentiment is correct: things are getting more and more expensive in the GTA (= Greater Toronto Area).

    43. Re:Housing by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      The maximum salary in Toronto is 80k.....so yes, go ahead and enjoy the silence.

      Say what? I was making $90K in Toronto fifteen years ago, (before the company I worked for pissed me off and I quit, just a couple of years before they tanked), and salaries have gone up since then.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    44. Re:Housing by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that mortgage interest is not tax deducible in Canada like it is in the good old USA. Neither is property tax and in Toronto it's very high. A lot of big ticket items like cars cost more in Canada and the price of gas is approaching that of Europe. Actually, a lot of things cost more in Canada due to lack of competition compared to the US. So the cost of living is pretty high in Toronto compared to most US cities.

      Toronto does have a very good public transit system - when they aren't on strike - so that's a plus. The weather kind of sucks there - long cold winters and short humid summers. Most of Canada is like that with the exception of Vancouver, which is a beautiful city but horrendously expensive.

    45. Re:Housing by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Toronto is becoming similar to Vancouver in that the government(s) responsible for the place, seem to have /almost/ 0 care factor about corrupt Chinese money being funneled in via overseas property purchasing or basically giving out residency like candy (for enough money, see also: Australia)

      Honestly, I thought Toronto was worse than it must be for this to have even occurred. I thought it was only a bit behind Vancouver.

      These 2 things (the tech jobs, Chinese property investment) can not be good for the original locals and youth of Toronto.

    46. Re:Housing by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      More of the startup scene is people with generational wealth and connections to investors.

    47. Re: Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The year 1950.

    48. Re:Housing by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      When the median house price in San Francisco is over $1.6m, using the 1/3rds rule, you need to be making $533k in salary to realistically own a home there.

      Your numbers don't add up. That's because a first-time buyer (without assets) buys a starter home, not a median home. Let's flesh it out with solid scenarios:

      (1) First time buyer, has rented for 5 years to build up downpayment, is now looking at a starter home. Studio rent is $2k/month in San Jose, so if you earned $100k/year after tax then you'd be paying 24% of your salary on rent, and being frugal you're saving up 25% of it. That will make $125k downpayment at the time you buy your house. Median starter home price is $450k in Oakland, $650k in San Jose, $800k in SF. Let's stay in San Jose, so you need a mortgage of $525k. At 4% interest for a 30-year fixed, you'll be paying $2.5k/month, adding up to 30% of your salary.

      (2) Ten-year home owner, has accrued $400k in equity, is now looking at a mid-range home. Median house price is $1.1M in San Jose, so needs a mortgage of $600k or $2.8k/month. I trust that you're earning more money now, say $130k/year after tax. That works out at 25% of your salary.

    49. Re: Housing by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Feces can be DNA typed. Existing profiles can be searched, and offenders could be awarded a title of "The Pooh". There could be a column in the paper called
      "Pooh Corners".

    50. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not realistically.

      That's buying way more house than you can actually comfortably afford. This is how you get empty houses, people can't afford to furnish them.

    51. Re:Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to know the difference between Toronto and SF? The average person in SF makes nearly $60k/year(converted) more then the average person in Toronto. The average housing price in Toronto is $1.58m as well. On top of that, your average taxes(all combined) in Ontario is around 43-45% of your yearly income.

      Canada also has a lifetime capital gains exemption of $835,716.

      That means that if your Canuck startup succeeds, the first $800,000 of everybody's capital gains on their options are completely tax-free. If you're a founder and your team of 5-10 buddies is merely acquihired, that's still a pretty decent outcome.

    52. Re: Housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of propaganda. It is worse than it used to be but the visuals have more to do with the interim mayor that pushed homeless people out of their previous haunts in a move to "clean up the homeless problem" forcing them into more visible areas. Also to note that other cities have been literally busing homeless people into the city and dropping them on the streets.

    53. Re:Housing by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      There is a sales tax on a new home purchase. There is NO CAPITAL GAINS TAX on your resale for any home.

      Buy a million dollar home, sell it for two, and you pocket a net net million after normal real estate fees.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    54. Re: Housing by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Jokes write themselves. I was accused of pooping on a corner, isn't that some shit? Imagine the dude that has to sample it - a shit job.

      Seems like it would be cheaper for the city to rent some johnny on the spot toilets.

  3. call centers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are just glorified call centers with very low wages.

    1. Re:call centers by blindseer · · Score: 1

      These are just glorified call centers with very low wages.

      In a call center there are a lot of low wage jobs but these are skilled labor positions. The people on the phones need managers, and computers they use need support. The people on the phones will gain further skills on the job, and be able to save money for certifications, training, and college. I worked in call centers and the people there were probably 2/3rds those that will work that job until they die, and the rest moving on to be managers, programmers, and other high wage jobs. Maybe I'm being optimistic on the future prospects of those working there but then at a minimum it's jobs that didn't end up elsewhere.

      Some might laugh at working in a call center as "skilled labor". I worked as a computer lab monitor in college, basically I was there to keep the printer stocked with paper and make sure people didn't walk off with the computers. I'd also be responsible for answering questions students had with the computers. You'd be surprised at how much "skill" it takes to just operate a computer because I saw people that lacked these skills. These were people that graduated high school. Granted, some were from overseas and taking biology or something where they might not need to interact with a computer often. That just means that while they were intelligent enough for college they lacked the skills to operate a computer. If there's jobs for these intelligent people to get some experience with a phone and and computer then unskilled people can get skills needed for many other technical, clerical, and managerial positions.

      Another thing, the people in these jobs might not be bound for some high wage technical position but their children might. A parent with a job that they only have to answer the phone and type some things into a computer will have the money to buy a phone and computer for their home, and teach their children how to use them.

      There are all kinds of governments (city, state, national, whatever) that are willing to invest real money in getting a call center into their area. Or, they would if they were smart and cared about the future. This means in 20 years, give or take, they will have a large population of experienced workers that have basic skills needed to move up to high wage jobs, young adults that grew up in a home with literate and skilled parents, and many others somewhere in between.

      Go ahead and laugh. We'll see who laughs last. California is in a downward spiral. If they can't even attract call centers to their state then they will have much greater problems very soon.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    2. Re:call centers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      call centers don't innovate or create more jobs.

    3. Re: call centers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for one and at first ir was normal, later the payments started to come late and dime chinos of our paycheks started to disappear, long shifts we're normal and bathroom time was a problem, later we found that our manager was taking money from the employees, he was fired but no money was recovered, now I see no change at all.... you can start to invest the little money you get in certifications but you won't have the time needed to actually learn (basically, you just pay to put tour name on it) stuff that in 1 year Will be obsolet, It's a dead end job.

  4. And not surprisingly... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 0

    Toronto had a recent mass shooting. No doubt that they will blame California for that.

    1. Re:And not surprisingly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just the n|ggers.

  5. Too bad Toronto is a shithole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the people there are hateful assholes.

    Otherwise, I'd be interested.

  6. USA closed for business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Thanks Obama....

  7. Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's an old joke in Canada, that Toronto believes it's the centre of the universe(or at least Canada). It's not far from the truth, every major company in Canada is either fully or partially headquartered there or within 150km of it. For tech, you're guaranteed front access to the best place in the country for internet as well. 151 Front St, basically every ISP connects there, and every data center in the country has a massive presence there. It's the heart of money in the country, seat of provincial government, and within ~5hrs(train), 4-6hrs car to Ottawa. Letting you get all the hobnobbing in that anyone who wants to make connections could care to do.

    Downside to Toronto? Nearly 75% of the 1/3 of the population of Canada(Windsor to Ottawa) lives in the area. Your workers need massive pay to live there. The median housing price is $1.58M, but the average worker makes less then $60k/year. In my area, the average income is $43k/year(that's around 140km from Toronto), but the housing prices are well over $400k/year these days. There's a lot of commuting from London, Woodstock, Kitchener and Waterloo and Milton(from the south) into Toronto now as people have been priced out of housing, and that's *in* the tech sector. Renting? Ha good luck. When I was living on Broadview(that's just off the Danforth where the shooting was a couple of days ago back in '06ish), I was paying $1200/mo in a basement apartment and that was a deal. It's around $3800/mo right now, worse in other areas. Living in an apt. building, that has a literal roach problem can run you $4.2k/mo right in the downtown area.

    On top of that living in Canada is expensive. Right now you're looking at $1.24-1.46/L($4.50-6/gal) for gas, you're going to drive a lot. Electricity during peak(8-20h) is $0.185kWh. Despite "free healthcare" you're gonna be waiting a long time for surgery, say 1.5yrs for cataract, 1-2mo for cancer diagnosis, another 1-3mo for starting treatment after that diagnosis. Up to 12mo for bypass surgery. On top of that, medications and dental aren't covered so you'll want to get supplemental health insurance from a company like greenshield.ca or blueshield.ca that'll help but figure $150-300mo/person. Many companies have some type of plan, but there's plenty that don't. Don't hope to have a family doctor, plenty of people don't. Some have been waiting 10 years to get one. Also don't hope on finding a specialist for anything nearby, you might have to drive up to 400km even living in Toronto to get one. Whole bunch of stuff I'm forgetting as well.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I live in downtown Toronto. You can rent a nice condo in a new building downtown for $1900/month or maybe even a bit less ($1600). My sister has rented apartments in other parts of the city for $1200/month. Your $3800/month for a basement apartment quote is way off!

      As for housing, I get junk mail from real estate agents regularly. You can buy downtown codos between $430K - $900K.

      Housing prices and rent prices have gone up a lot over the last few years, sure, but it's not as bad as you say it is.

    2. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. One of my co-workers quit his job and moved there because of the "tech boom". He had a good job and decent salary here, but then moved here because of the salary they were offering. He didn't take into account for the higher cost of living plus the "outrageous" (outrageous is a matter of interpretation thus the quotes) taxation compared to America. Within about four months he came back to his old job and moved back to America. By the time he accounted for expenses and taxes, he made significantly less than he was making here.

      Admittedly, we are *NOT* in one of the "expensive" (SF, SD, LA, NY, etc) places to live here in the US, so that played, at least in part, to why living here was so much cheaper.

    3. Re:Not a surprise by hawkfish · · Score: 1

      Despite "free healthcare" you're gonna be waiting a long time for surgery, say 1.5yrs for cataract,

      Um, no. According to the Canadian Institute for Health Care, 71% receive treatment within 112 days, 90% within 210 days. I don't know where you get 540 days from.

      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
    4. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAN , not "then"!!! Jesus!!

    5. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um...yes. That's Canada. Not Ontario, this is Ontario.

      Here's an example from Ontario, of a 427 days Remember that the ONTARIO average is 217 days, and Toronto is in Ontario. In Toronto, 270-316 days isn't outside the norm.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Not a surprise by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      'here' = ?

    7. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: How many Torontonians does it takes to change a light bulb?
      A: Just 1 - he holds the bulb still above his head then waits for the world to rotate around him.

    8. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect he wasn't making an apples to apples comparison since in Canada you don't need to pay for healthcare. It is quite expensive here and should be factored into any cost of living comparison. Usually it ends up being pretty close with taxes covering more in Canada that you would otherwise have to spend your own money on. Dollar for dollar it is very close unless you're comparing to Kansas or Oklahoma or Mississippi in which case yeah, its much cheaper in the U.S.

    9. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And here in America, more precisely Phoenix my mother waited almost a year to get a shunt put in her head.

      When its not an emergency things can and do wait. My mother went almost a year being so off balance that she could barely walk. She wasn't in danger of dying though and thankfully is much better now that she got the shunt put in.

      More to the point, if it was a real problem Canadian's would be calling for more doctors and hospitals which would bring the wait times down. This is a much simpler formula than the American system which has to deal with insurance causing tons of delays and clogged emergency room visits from people without insurance taking both time and money away from hospitals which now can't afford more doctors and nurses. There is so much inefficiency in the US system for healthcare that I can't fathom why people are so against consolidating duplication of effort.

    10. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite "free healthcare" you're gonna be waiting a long time for surgery, say 1.5yrs for cataract, 1-2mo for cancer diagnosis, another 1-3mo for starting treatment after that diagnosis. Up to 12mo for bypass surgery. On top of that, medications and dental aren't covered so you'll want to get supplemental health insurance from a company like greenshield.ca [greenshield.ca] or blueshield.ca that'll help but figure $150-300mo/person.

      Canada. What're you doing??

    11. Re:Not a surprise by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't we compare canada to some backwater? Apples to apples is fair.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:Not a surprise by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      It's part and parcel to the whole approach to health care in Canada. If you're diagnosed with cancer, or need a heart bypass, you'll be treated within days. Have something that isn't going to kill you (knee replacement, cataract etc), you're going to wait (or pay Unlike how Congress has handcuffed Medicare, provincial health systems are allowed to study the efficacy and cost effectiveness of various treatments and medications and negotiate bulk discounts with big pharma.

    13. Re:Not a surprise by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      Firstly because its not true My uncle just had a heart attack, had his bypass surgery 3 days later. My best friend is a radiation oncologist, he typically sees patients within days of their diagnosis. My wife just had a biopsy to check out her thyroid, had to wait 2 weeks. Yes, you're going to wait for something that isn't going to kill you (my Dad had to wait 9 months for a hip replacement) and it's true that medication outside the hospital aren't covered, but provincial governments negotiate substantial discounts with big pharma so drugs are much cheaper here.

    14. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... Such a misleading post. Please post your sources, I've checked most and turn out to be false. Starting with your gas conversion 1.26 cad/l is nowhere near 4.5usd/gal. 100-300 in health insurance? Lol... Again, nonsense. Wait times for bypass in Toronto is approx. 70 days. http://www.ontariowaittimes.com

      I love how you also included the recent shooting to scare people. Why do you hate the centre of the universe so much?

      Others who are reading this should check/validate the OPs points and realize it's complete nonsense.

    15. Re: Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we are hardcore in desperate need of doctors. Here in BC, we have a good chunk of retiring doctors that have huge patient loads and younger doctors are not replacing them at same pace or patient count. My town of 60k will be something like 14 doctors short next year. Part of our problem is rural areas, as well. But it's also a money thing. They don't even approve $15k bonuses to try and attract more docs.

      I have no problem hiring qualified foreign doctors, so long as their English is good. When I broke my arm as a kid, the doctor put my arm in 90 degree cast from wrist to above elbow, fucking over my summer vs a wrist only cast. When I asked about not getting the cast above the elbow, the fucking doctor went off on a rant about knowing more than me and going to school for so many years. Nurse had to calm him down and explain the impact on a 12 year old boy in summer and wasn't questioning his qualifications. I still think about this decades later. Being able to communicate with your doctor is really fucking important.

      But yeah, we're super in need of more doctors.

    16. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an old joke in Canada, that Toronto believes it's the centre of the universe(or at least Canada). It's not far from the truth, every major company in Canada is either fully or partially headquartered there or within 150km of it.

      Wrong it's the GTA who things this. Toronto proper actually has little to say and little political capital

      For tech, you're guaranteed front access to the best place in the country for internet as well. 151 Front St, basically every ISP connects there, and every data center in the country has a massive presence there. It's the heart of money in the country, seat of provincial government, and within ~5hrs(train), 4-6hrs car to Ottawa. Letting you get all the hobnobbing in that anyone who wants to make connections could care to do.

      This part above is 100% accurate.

      Downside to Toronto? Nearly 75% of the 1/3 of the population of Canada(Windsor to Ottawa) lives in the area.

      The above is hard to parse, but also accurate

      Your workers need massive pay to live there. The median housing price is $1.58M, but the average worker makes less then $60k/year.

      The above is kind of true, prices aren't that bad but average wages are.

      In my area, the average income is $43k/year(that's around 140km from Toronto),

      140km from Toronto is not Toronto. It's not Mississauga, it's not Oakville, it's not Oshawa. Fuck it's not even Barrie, the armpit of Ontario. 140km from Toronto is a totally different place.

      but the housing prices are well over $400k/year these days.

      Sadly the above is probably true. In general Canadian housing is waaaaay over priced.

      There's a lot of commuting from London, Woodstock,

      False. I do know people who commute from pretty darned far, but not that far and if there are people commuting that far, it's nowhere near "a lot". For reference, London is about two hours (with no traffic) from Toronto and Woodstock is like an hour and thirty five minutes (with no traffic). With traffic you're looking at three to four hours each way, it's just ridiculous.

      Kitchener and Waterloo

      Only about an hour away, we do have a lot of commuters from here

      and Milton(from the south)

      this is what pissed me off. Milton is West and slightly North of Toronto. The OP is fucked in the head.

      into Toronto now as people have been priced out of housing, and that's *in* the tech sector.

      The above gets back to reality again

      Renting? Ha good luck. When I was living on Broadview(that's just off the Danforth where the shooting was a couple of days ago back in '06ish), I was paying $1200/mo in a basement apartment and that was a deal.

      That was not a deal, you were getting screwed. In 2006 I lived in the Annex (a neighbourhood closer to downtown than Riverdale) and I was paying $950 for a two bedroom. Even today in the junction (farther from downtown than the Annex or Riverdale but still within a few miles) I pay $1350.

      Learn to shop.

      It's around $3800/mo right now, worse in other areas. Living in an apt. building, that has a literal roach problem can run you $4.2k/mo right in the downtown area.

      This is true... but there are other places!!!!!!!!

      On top of that living in Canada is expensive. Right now you're looking at $1.24-1.46/L($4.50-6/gal) for gas,

      This is true, actually even higher if you have a car that uses premium fuel.

      you're going to drive a lot.

      Bullshit to the above, if you live in Toronto you don't need to own a car unless you have children


      Electricity during peak(8-20h) is $0.185kWh.

      Yes our electrical is fu

    17. Re:Not a surprise by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I also have an uncle who lives in the GTA and needed a triple bypass, he got it within a week, at no meaningful expense to himself.

      American pathological individualism is the only thing protecting Canada from a refugee crisis.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    18. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      If you're diagnosed with cancer, or need a heart bypass, you'll be treated within days.

      Well I guess 21 days, is within days right? I mean that's the length of time you'll wait right now in one of the largest hospital centers in Ontario(LHSC). That's for top priority cancer patients, it's supposed to be 7 days. For heart surgery, if you're a top 1, it is generally 1 day. They're also more likely to fly you to Toronto or Kitchener if you're at any hospital from say Brandford south to Windsor.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    19. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Except where you're waiting 21 days as a top priority cancer patient right? Or a week and change to have angioplasty done? In both cases, you're likely to die. Quickly and painfully but those are the norm, you did look up the numbers on those links right? No, I guess you didn't.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    20. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      And yet, in all those cases when you look at the reported wait times what do you see? That your uncle got treatment before most people, and most people wait up to 34 days for that. Good on him for getting into a hospital with a low wait time. Your best friend, is at a hospital where wait times are low. I'm guessing outside of the GTA, K/W and LHSC. Because those are around 21 days. Your wife got lucky on the biopsy because let me guess it was at the same hospital as your uncle? The wait time is around 61 days for a top priority patient.

      but provincial governments negotiate substantial discounts with big pharma so drugs are much cheaper here.

      Correction, all of the provinces buy drugs together. But if you haven't noticed the last 2 years there's been a substantial shortage of drugs in many areas because they've been buying for a "projected number of people based on trends" instead of the old way where if they're buying more then needed, and donating as required to other countries if they're approaching the shelf-life.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    21. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      'here' = ?

      SWON.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    22. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't we compare canada to some backwater? Apples to apples is fair.

      You mean the UK? I mean, they're just letting people die in the hospitals there because they can't treat them.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    23. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Post places, because looking through rental ads I can't find any. And the ones that you're talking about in a "new building downtown" don't exist, but they do seem to exist in the appt buildings from the 1970's that are in unsafe areas of the city for example.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    24. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're exaggerating. I Airbnb'd for a while in downtown toronto for $4k/month. This was in a really nice condo on a high floor off college. So I'm pretty sure if you really want to you could find a permanent apartment for a lot less than $4k/mo without roaches. Also you don't really need a car if you're living in Toronto. Public transportation works well enough and the go train system is pretty expensive. And if for some reason you DO need a car, Enterprise is pretty cheap there.

      I think we can all agree that the cost of living-to-salary situation in canada isn't great, but it's not nearly as bad as you make it out to be.

    25. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > go train system is pretty expensive

      I mean "extensive". That was a bit of a freudian slip haha.

    26. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but what have you been smoking exactly? I live in Toronto and I know many of your numbers are way off

      Granted, the salaries here are not as comparable to many tech hubs in the states, but seriously, where are you getting this "median housing price is $1.58M" from? Even detached houses with double garage in most areas in the city don't reach that high at its peak price. The average tech worker with some experiences easily make well over 70k per year minimum if not more. Also, what area do you live at that requires a massive "$400k/year" for a house?

      Also what the fuck are you going on about rent and how "It's around $3800/mo right now, worse in other areas. Living in an apt. building, that has a literal roach problem can run you $4.2k/mo right in the downtown area." , did you live in a decked out executive suite? As bad as rent is, it's not even close to $4200k/mo bad and a simple MLS search can prove you're full of shit.

      Yes, the housing prices are indeed pricing people out, rental prices have gone up a lot, but you're doing a massive disservice to people by throwing out random made-up numbers to fit your story. Here's a good breakdown on housing prices for anyone interested https://www.zolo.ca/toronto-real-estate/trends , or realtor.ca for what's ACTUALLY on the market for rent and for sale.

      Don't even get me started on the whole family doctor and insurance thing, because as long as you are employed, i don't know of any tech companies that don't cover the supplemental insurance that's not covered in standard OHIP. I can't weigh in on the wait time tho i do know it can be bad, but given your tendency to throw out random numbers I'd caution others to do their due diligence on any of your numbers as well. Getting family doctors can be a challenge yes, I will give you that, but do you seriously believe that people who have been actively searching for 10 years and can't find a family doctor, and you might have to drive up to 400km even living in Toronto to get a specialist is true? If so, then the only thing you're forgetting is to take your medication

      We don't need more FUD in this world, talk facts, otherwise please stay the hell away from everyone

    27. Re:Not a surprise by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      There's an old joke in Canada, that Toronto believes it's the centre of the universe(or at least Canada). It's not far from the truth, every major company in Canada is either fully or partially headquartered there or within 150km of it. For tech, you're guaranteed front access to the best place in the country for internet as well. 151 Front St, basically every ISP connects there, and every data center in the country has a massive presence there. It's the heart of money in the country, seat of provincial government, and within ~5hrs(train), 4-6hrs car to Ottawa. Letting you get all the hobnobbing in that anyone who wants to make connections could care to do.

      Downside to Toronto? Nearly 75% of the 1/3 of the population of Canada(Windsor to Ottawa) lives in the area. Your workers need massive pay to live there. The median housing price is $1.58M, but the average worker makes less then $60k/year. In my area, the average income is $43k/year(that's around 140km from Toronto), but the housing prices are well over $400k/year these days. There's a lot of commuting from London, Woodstock, Kitchener and Waterloo and Milton(from the south) into Toronto now as people have been priced out of housing, and that's *in* the tech sector. Renting? Ha good luck. When I was living on Broadview(that's just off the Danforth where the shooting was a couple of days ago back in '06ish), I was paying $1200/mo in a basement apartment and that was a deal. It's around $3800/mo right now, worse in other areas. Living in an apt. building, that has a literal roach problem can run you $4.2k/mo right in the downtown area.

      On top of that living in Canada is expensive. Right now you're looking at $1.24-1.46/L($4.50-6/gal) for gas, you're going to drive a lot. Electricity during peak(8-20h) is $0.185kWh. Despite "free healthcare" you're gonna be waiting a long time for surgery, say 1.5yrs for cataract, 1-2mo for cancer diagnosis, another 1-3mo for starting treatment after that diagnosis. Up to 12mo for bypass surgery. On top of that, medications and dental aren't covered so you'll want to get supplemental health insurance from a company like greenshield.ca or blueshield.ca that'll help but figure $150-300mo/person. Many companies have some type of plan, but there's plenty that don't. Don't hope to have a family doctor, plenty of people don't. Some have been waiting 10 years to get one. Also don't hope on finding a specialist for anything nearby, you might have to drive up to 400km even living in Toronto to get one. Whole bunch of stuff I'm forgetting as well.

      Why don't you leave. So negative. My son lives at John and Front in a superb condo. He walks to work, has all amenities, and his rent is around 1600/mo for 1 bedroom apt. If he commutes by moving away, he gets a 3 bedroom for a little more than that amount.

      And you forgot to mention --- NO GUNS -- and Low crime rate. Look at gun killings for all of Toronto and all of Canada.

      And many workers work from home and use skype or other and attend meetings in person once every 10 days.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    28. Re:Not a surprise by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, 1.5 years for a cataract? I would have been fucked. Both eyes when they decided to be a problem went from clear to 75% gone within two months. The other eye decided to be a problem about 1.5 years after the first one was operated on. Here in America I saw one of the best doctors in the US and it was done within a few weeks. I'm a pilot and that would certainly ground me during that time. So I'd be out for almost 3 years. I got the multifocal lens. It's a bit like christmas at night with the rings around the lights. As they have settled in it isn't as bad. I can still fly a single engine plane into Tampa or NYC at night, no problem.

    29. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Why don't you leave. So negative. My son lives at John and Front in a superb condo. He walks to work, has all amenities, and his rent is around 1600/mo for 1 bedroom apt. If he commutes by moving away, he gets a 3 bedroom for a little more than that amount.

      I work here, right now. That's why. And I'd rather fix the province, then let the left and progressives continue to destroy it. I'll also bet that your son's superb condo is around 350sqft. Which is roughly the norm in John and Front St.

      And you forgot to mention --- NO GUNS -- and Low crime rate. Look at gun killings for all of Toronto and all of Canada.

      LOL guns are all over the place in Toronto. Go look at the TPS crime map, the number of "shots fired" cases recorded are unbelievable. The number of shootings in the GTA is up 55% from last year making it more dangerous then Thunder Bay, and gang activity from last year is up a whopping 240% from 2017. And we're not even finished the year of 2018 yet.

      And many workers work from home and use skype or other and attend meetings in person once every 10 days.

      Really? Cause going by the demands of companies in the area they want you to be on-site all the time. Likely because the whole telecommuting thing has been on massive decline over the last year.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    30. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Private for-pay practices are generally not allowed in Canada. Just another benefit of universal healthcare.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    31. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Wow... Such a misleading post.

      Except it's not, see why don't you check ontariogasprices.com for instance. See that greenshield link? Yep, click on it. The average wait time for a bypass is 84-196 days. Did you even click on your own link? You should probably check and validate your own post, it explains why you posted as a AC though.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    32. Re:Not a surprise by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      You know, the parts where you're wrong are the parts where you disagreed with me. I mean, in what world is Milton west and north of Toronto? When it's SOUTH and before Mississauga. I could round out the other parts where you said I was wrong, but there's no point.

      Bullshit to the above, if you live in Toronto you don't need to own a car unless you have children

      Really? Which is why everyone owns a car unless you're a block from the subway system.

      The above is capital C conservative propaganda. Sometimes we do have bad wait times but not really. My father's cancer treatment was much faster (Barrie) and even dislocating a shoulder on hallowe'en I was in/out of St. Joseph's (Toronto) in less than four hours.

      Kinda like this, did you even look at the wait times? No you didn't. If you did, then you'd know it was reality. Do you really not understand why doctors started revolting in the last 3 years over the Ontario(Liberal) policies? Talk about being fundamentally ignorant of what's going on in your own backyard.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    33. Re:Not a surprise by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      You would be assuming wrong. My uncle is in Quebec City, my friend practices at the largest cancer center in Alberta, my wife's biopsy wasn't done at a hospital, but a regional lab. The big issue with looking at the reported wait times, is that it lumps everyone together. Delivery in Canada is largely based on priority and urgency, not how much money you have, or how gold plated your insurance is. If you have a minor blockage in your heart, you may wait 2-3 months for surgery (or longer), but if you have a major blockage you'll be in surgery within a week. Same with cancer, my friend treats more aggressive lung cancers so there is more urgency to see his patients. Health care delivery is an individual Provincial responsibility and each province sets their own drug formulary. While some provinces do group together to purchase drugs, there is no requirement to do so. For example BC and Alberta work together, Quebec does it's own thing. Is the system perfect, absolutely not, but it does a far better job in allocating resources to where they are most needed. As of 2015 the US spends almost twice as much per capita on healthcare vs Canada. Yet Canada has better overall healthcare outcomes, and its easy to see why from just a few interactions my close friends and family has had with the US system 1. My friend, before coming back to Canada, practiced in Boston. In Canada his hospital has 4 MRIs that run almost around the clock (you can get in pretty quick if you're willing to get your MRI done at 3:30am), at the hospital in Boston (which was half the size), they had 5 MRIs that only ran 9-5 and included one within the cancer center portion that was used at most 2 hours a day (they didn't want to share their MRI with the general hospital population) 2. While in Boston he was instructed by management to personally attend MRI scans for people with insurance. This not only allowed the hospital to bill insurance for a "doctor supervised scan" at 3 times the price, but it "looked good" to the patients improving their satisfaction scores that were used by marketing. He's not a radiologist, he didn't run the MRI, he just stood there in his white coat. In Canada, he enters the MRI prescription into the system, the patent goes down to radiology and he gets the results. He can see 2 times the patients here since he doesn't have to do a whole raft of pointless things that had zero to do with healthcare delivery while in Boston 3. My wife, while in the states had to take my son to the hospital for a minor respiratory infection (thankfully we had travel insurance). After the free valet parking took care of the rental car, my son had a chest x-ray and MRI of his chest. When we got home, our family doctor was dumfounded as simply listening to my sons chest with a stethoscope would have been sufficient to diagnose the infection and prescribe an antibiotic. Insurance paid out almost $10k for what should have been a trivial diagnosis

    34. Re:Not a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just checked. Where are prices above 4.5/gal? Also checked bypass wait times showing 70 days around Toronto. I have to agree, your data sources don't check out.

    35. Re:Not a surprise by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      I met a guy at a pool party that had a very scared up shoulder. He had major surgery done. He said he was a British citizen and hurt it. They said it would be a little over 5 years to wait to fix it, however they would fix it eventually. So he said it was actually faster to move his family to America, become citizens, get coverage and get the operation done here.

      Then I keep hearing how great the UK and Canadian systems are.

  8. Geoffrey Hinton Effect? by jma05 · · Score: 1

    He has back problems and won't fly - "I sat down in 2005".
    This is the deep learning industry growing around his lab.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...

  9. and that's thanks to stupid urban planning by skam240 · · Score: 2

    Those high prices are thanks to the region's stupid growth planning. If prices are so high, where is all of the new construction? At those prices San Francisco and the Valley south of there should be on a building spree of new high-rise construction which would make tons of money for developers and push up housing supply which would lower prices for everyone. This isn't being allowed to happen by local government and now those people selling us our food live in poverty at $20 an hour.

    The Bay Area's housing price problem is a simple problem of supply being kept artificially low in the face of huge demand. This has been going on long enough that it looks like it is finally effecting the region's economy.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:and that's thanks to stupid urban planning by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      it looks like it is finally effecting the region's economy.

      Wrong. The region has had an economy for a long time now.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:and that's thanks to stupid urban planning by blindseer · · Score: 1

      We'll see if the economy still exists in 15 or 20 years.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    3. Re:and that's thanks to stupid urban planning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High rise would also require a functioning public transport in the Bay Area. The traffic is already a nightmare.

  10. Toronto will never beat San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    when it comes to anonymous gay sex. I get my cock sucked on a daily basis, never once the same twink. No matter where I am, I can do to the bathroom, whip out grndr and have another man's lips wrapped around my engorged pecker before I'm finished taking a shit. I was in Toronto for a week and had to jerk off a couple times! It's that bad!

  11. Dodging bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toronto also created more shootings than all of those other cities combined.

    Something like 650 gun related incidents a year now.

    1. Re:Dodging bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Toronto also created more shootings than all of those other cities combined.

      Something like 650 gun related incidents a year now.

      But Canada already banned all the guns. What are they going to do now, ban them again?

    2. Re:Dodging bullets by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      No, America still makes us look good.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Dodging bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toronto also created more shootings than all of those other cities combined.

      Something like 650 gun related incidents a year now.

      But Canada already banned all the guns. What are they going to do now, ban them again?

      There are plenty of guns in Canada. You should diversify your news sources.

      https://globalnews.ca/news/1354803/fact-checking-michael-moore-does-canada-have-more-guns-per-capita-than-the-us/

  12. Leela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leela come in Leela

    1. Re:Leela by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to officer 1BDI?

  13. Guess who will take credit by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sadly, Ontario just gave a Trumpoid former drug dealer and his fundamentalist Conservative Party a majority government. No doubt they'll claim this is all thanks to them (although they've only been in power for a couple of weeks). And when they blast the provincial debt through the roof with unfunded tax cuts, then sell off taxpayer-owned assets to pretty up the books, they'll blame everybody but themselves. It happened before with a cretinous monster named Mike Harris.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    1. Re:Guess who will take credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, Ontario just gave a Trumpoid former drug dealer and his fundamentalist Conservative Party a majority government. No doubt they'll claim this is all thanks to them (although they've only been in power for a couple of weeks). And when they blast the provincial debt through the roof with unfunded tax cuts, then sell off taxpayer-owned assets to pretty up the books, they'll blame everybody but themselves. It happened before with a cretinous monster named Mike Harris.

      It's ok, even a rotting goat carcass is better than the retarded lesbian we just got rid of.

    2. Re:Guess who will take credit by alexo · · Score: 2

      then sell off taxpayer-owned assets to pretty up the books, they'll blame everybody but themselves. It happened before with a cretinous monster named Mike Harris.

      And very recently with a Liberal premier named Kathleen Wynne.

    3. Re:Guess who will take credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And when they blast the provincial debt through the roof

      You can't claim to be worried about what Ford will do for the provincial debt after the liberals have *more than doubled it* during the period in which they were in power.

    4. Re:Guess who will take credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hydro was divided by Harris for the purpose of selling it.

      Politics in Ontario isn't as partisan as what is going on in the U.S. The "Liberal" party, in power for 15 years reversed few of Harris' decisions and even saw through some of the unpopular ones such as continuing on hydro privatization.

      Ford is the first partisan asshole to take the office in my lifetime. That said, he's not the smartest guy and not the most evil either. I don't expect him to get much done.

      Harris was smart and evil. Bad combination.

    5. Re:Guess who will take credit by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      The main difference between Harris and Wynne was the buddies they had lined up to gang rape Ontario taxpayers. There was even a certain amount of overlap in their policies: privatize a taxpayer asset and sell it to their friends at firesale prices. Both worked to privatize Ontario Hydro, for example.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
  14. Math can also be really misleading .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Right now, our total household income (both wife and I work full time in I.T.) is nowhere near $250,000/yr. -- but we certainly qualify as "upper middle class".

    My current mortgage payment is around $1,600/month and that's for a 2,200 square foot, 3 bedroom house with a 2 car detached garage, in Maryland.

    If I looked at the extra income we'd have if we had $250,000 between us each year? I'd still be really hard pressed to sign on the line for any mortgage resembling $6,000+ per month! We pretty much live paycheck to paycheck on the current income, by the time you consider the costs of raising 3 kids and the (I think reasonable) decision for both of us to buy nice, newer model vehicles to drive around.

    The tendency for lenders to loan money and make recommendations on "what you can afford" based simply on percentages of your total income is what got a whole lot of people in over their heads with home buying before the last economic crash.

    There's so much else to consider, including the rising cost of KEEPING whatever home you buy as its cost increases. If you have more land, you have more yard maintenance to deal with. Did you budget the cost of all that landscaping in? (I have a bunch of trees and shrubs that grow over the property line on both sides of my house, requiring constant pruning back. If you slack off on that, they clog the gutters and lead to water problems in the basement -- multiplying your cost of dealing with it all. Last time I got a quote to trim back just one side of that mess? The guy wanted over $2,000 for his landscapers to cut it all back to the fence line and haul it all away.) If you have more square footage, you owe more every year in property tax AND more in utility bills to keep that much air space heated or cooled.

    Even our basic bills for sewer and water have gone up exponentially. Clean water used to be something most people just received as almost a "throw away" bill. You know .... every few months you'd have to send the water company $30-40 to keep it paid up. Not anymore! The cost to treat the river water where I live is really high, and they have to pass it on to customers. Quarterly bills of hundreds of dollars are the norm.

    1. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by byteherder · · Score: 1

      If I looked at the extra income we'd have if we had $250,000 between us each year? I'd still be really hard pressed to sign on the line for any mortgage resembling $6,000+ per month! We pretty much live paycheck to paycheck on the current income, by the time you consider the costs of raising 3 kids and the (I think reasonable) decision for both of us to buy nice, newer model vehicles to drive around.

      When you have met your basic needs, all the income above that is disposable. If your income doubles, your food cost does not double, nor does your electric, gas, water, cell phone, cable, transportation costs. Your kids don't where twice as many clothes, your car payment doesn't increase. Basically, you are no longer living paycheck to paycheck.

      The tendency for lenders to loan money and make recommendations on "what you can afford" based simply on percentages of your total income is what got a whole lot of people in over their heads with home buying before the last economic crash.

      This was an exercise in what is possible, buying a home in San Francisco. The ultimate decision is still up to the individual.
      During the housing boom and then bust, lenders were making loans up to 50% of stated income. That is a little crazy.

      There's so much else to consider, including the rising cost of KEEPING whatever home you buy as its cost increases. If you have more land, you have more yard maintenance to deal with. Did you budget the cost of all that landscaping in? (I have a bunch of trees and shrubs that grow over the property line on both sides of my house, requiring constant pruning back. If you slack off on that, they clog the gutters and lead to water problems in the basement -- multiplying your cost of dealing with it all. Last time I got a quote to trim back just one side of that mess? The guy wanted over $2,000 for his landscapers to cut it all back to the fence line and haul it all away.) If you have more square footage, you owe more every year in property tax AND more in utility bills to keep that much air space heated or cooled.

      Even our basic bills for sewer and water have gone up exponentially. Clean water used to be something most people just received as almost a "throw away" bill. You know .... every few months you'd have to send the water company $30-40 to keep it paid up. Not anymore! The cost to treat the river water where I live is really high, and they have to pass it on to customers. Quarterly bills of hundreds of dollars are the norm.

      The cost of maintaining that $1.6m house is not necessarily more. It isn't sitting on a larger piece of land, just sitting on a way more expensive piece of land. Landscaping costs, irrigation, tree trimming costs, utilities are all about the same, Property taxes are proportional to the value of the home.

    2. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      We pretty much live paycheck to paycheck on the current income, by the time you consider the costs of raising 3 kids and the (I think reasonable) decision for both of us to buy nice, newer model vehicles to drive around.

      I hate to break it to you, but if you are living paycheck to paycheck, then it's not a reasonable decision to buy "nice, newer model vehicles to drive around.". You should save some money from your vehicle expenditures and get out of your paycheck to paycheck financial situation.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Definitely not. I've done 3 variants and it's a world of difference.
      First was a bus pass. IMO this was the 2nd best transportation experience despite there being a lot of waiting, ripoff cabs for late night travel, and limitations on employment / residential opportunities. Saved up money for option 2:
      A used car. Initially worked well but starting 6 months later it would have one surprise or another which made it a shop queen (idler pulley went, caliper bolt fell out causing the car to be unable to reverse, replacement headlight wouldn't mount properly due to unreported damage, impossible to pinpoint belt screech when starting, temperamental starting, mysterious electrical problems, battery died if car was not driven at least 20 miles a week, new battery did not help). As someone who doesn't care to work on cars, this got at best frustrating and at worst expensive. After putting 20,000 miles on it across 9 states, the district and 2 provinces, I no longer felt safe going faster than 60 or further than my county in it. I had gotten a sweet deal on a house, but because I would lose access to the bus as a backup option, I decided to keep renting. This was when I determined the car was more liability than asset, so on to option 3:
      A certified pre-owned car, barely 6 months old. Still had the Sirius XM free trial from when the previous owner drove it off the lot. Runs like a top, needs nothing but scheduled maintenance and oil changes. While the up-front cost was higher, my budget stopped having random holes blown in it from all the surprise problems.

      Now a buddy of mine loves working on cars, so for him getting random $500 decade-old beaters and managing to keep them running for years is a hobby of his. Makes sense for him. For anyone else... well there's a reason most cars in the parking lot are nice, new, or both.

      tl;dr Getting an older used car is rolling the dice on your budget, better to stick with the bus or spring for something newer.

    4. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      1. GP could have bought cheaper cars.
      2. Modern cars are a lot more reliable. There is a reason the average age of cars on the road in the USA is about 12 years. I own a 14 year old car (being driven by my daughter now) and I could put a new engine in it and still be way ahead on costs versus a new car.
      3. Almost everyone (probably you included) underestimates the cost of depreciation and doesn't add in the increase in insurance premiums on newer valuable cars.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are single and have no kids.

    6. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Idler pulley. Wow, you should have just junked it.

      How does the monthly $300 car payment and $200 full coverage insurance payment compare to the occasional repair bills?

      There is a reason most cars are 'new shiny'. Stupid people make their decisions with their egos.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Yeah when it went it took a bunch of belts with it, including the A/C. If the repair bills were occasional I'd have agreed - but it was in one shop or another almost every month. And unlike the monthly car payment and insurance, a "it could be fine or it could need $1000 of work next month" wreaks havoc on any budgeting. And that's the thing about rolling the dice - you could get a lemon or you could get something perfectly fine. But you never know. With a new(ish) car you get a mfgr warranty.

      Also to pass emissions inspections I needed to pour one of those "guaranteed to pass" fuel cleaner things in and drive 200 miles to naturally clear the codes. So I was making an annual trip to the nearest Chick Fil A (just under 100 miles from home) the day before inspection.

    8. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      My shitty car was a 2005 model - it was only 7 or 8 years old when I got it. Did all the research and everyone online swore those cars could go 250,000 miles easy.
        The one good thing was the low purchase price allowed me to leave enough invested to afford the newer car in cash later. In college I saw a video about buying a used car instead of a new one, and taking what you would have made in car payments and investing it. I one-up'd the advice and took the bus while investing, then bought the shitbox in cash figuring a real car in cash would be just around the corner. My $500/month investment kept getting eaten by shitbox maintenance, so I figured if I'm basically making erratic car payments on a shitty car, might as well pay the same and have something that actually works. So cash+2 year loan = fully paid off nicebox.

    9. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Now you're just making shit up. Cars have only had one serpentine belt for about 30 years.

      The idler screaming was a warning, most people replace them before they seize. Any moron can do it.

      If you put half a car payment per month into an older car, in 6 months it will be straight. Unless you bought an old french car or something really stupid like that.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps GP's problem wasn't the car, but the shop or shops he was taking it too.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    11. Re:Math can also be really misleading .... by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      It didn't scream, it just gave up with no warning and suddenly I was idling like I was going through an earthquake. Car smoothed out at speed. According to mechanic when it broke it damaged something needed for the AC (which I had immediately noticed as well, due to it being 90+ outside that day), I blame Japanese car manufacturers for putting everything so close together. And no amount of throwing money into that hole worked, every time one thing was fixed something else would break months later. At one point I even brought it to the dealership (due to a problem with a car-specific emissions-related part, which would throw a code intermittently which eventually became always).

      I will say that my "a bunch of belts" was a lazy retelling of something that happened years ago. I don't know wtf was wrong with it just that my wallet was leaking and a new car made it stop.

  15. Canadian Hospitality? by foxalopex · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have to wonder with anti-everyone almost Trump policies in the US if Tech companies aren't just relocating to Canada because you don't end up in silly situations such as your lead tech speaker being denied at the border due to race issues or something else going wrong in the US such as the Tariff wars that are going on now. Canada has the accessibility from Toronto to International Markets and isn't busy trying to Tariff everything.

    1. Re:Canadian Hospitality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to be this retarded.

    2. Re:Canadian Hospitality? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Maybe eat lots of fish.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  16. Not for much longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Trump clone that is PM of Ontario is doing his best to drive industry away and from all report, he is suceeding.

    1. Re:Not for much longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look. Biff was terrorizing us with his Trumpian stupidity before Trump was president. You should be blaming us for el jefe naranja

  17. Re: Oh no you know what that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will be very happy if you take PopeRatzo off our hands.

  18. Did you write perl or shell for my company? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    Downside to Toronto? Nearly 75% of the 1/3 of the population of Canada(Windsor to Ottawa) lives in the area.

    Your post was good, but I have to laugh at this. It reminds me quite a bit of some of the shell and perl I inherited on my job from past employees who are now gone. 75% of 1/3 is 24.75%, or by rounding up, 25%. But I guess it's more fun to say "75% of 1/3 of Canada's population" than "25% of Canada's population".

  19. Doug Ford - Ontario Premier by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    He might not be the brightest politician in Canada but he is under adult supervision. The Conservative party limited his tweeting before the election and I'm sure they will take it away soon. He can blow a lot of hot air but he won't actually do much. His powers are limited and he has few allies in his party. The cabinet seems to have been chosen from the most competent elected members of the Conservative party. (disclaimer - for the first time ever I spoiled my ballot in the provincial election. I didn't like any of my options. I thought Wynne was by far the smartest leader but her party became to socialist even for me. I would have voted Conservative if the party had chosen either Christine Elliott or Caroline Mulroney)

    1. Re:Doug Ford - Ontario Premier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Biff's cabinet is strong and they're reigning him in so far... but given the damage his idiot brother did as a literal powerless mayor in a weak mayor city I trust Biff to find a way to screw up worse than Wynne.

  20. Quality of jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all due respect, did anyone investigate the quality of jobs? In my experience, Canada gets all the shit jobs that US-based companies outsource to them. Who cares how many low-paying shit jobs get opened in Canada? What matters is how many quality jobs open here. How many new businesses actually have their world HQ in Toronto?

  21. 100% Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody would vote a drug dealer into power, no matter what your allegation. If you're talking about the Globe and Fail hit piece on Doug Ford from four years ago, none of the sources were identified and there has never been a single shred of solid evidence or record of police interaction.

    I don't know what Trump has to do with Doug Ford, but I don't recall Trump stumping for Ford, so you are wrong there too.

    The Liberal party ran the provincial debt up from $132 Billion to $308 Billion for sixteen years from 2002 to 2018 due to profligate spending. While you would love to blame Doug Ford for something he hasn't yet done, the Liberal Party and NDP have a clear record of running up deficits.

    You lied about Ford, you ignored the record of the previous government in power for nearly two decades, and you are speculating on something that hasn't happened yet. Pathetic mudslinging at its worst. No wonder people are so fed up with your ilk.

    1. Re:100% Incorrect by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Nobody would vote a drug dealer into power, no matter what your allegation.

      Don't underestimate the stupidity of an electorate. We used to have Marion Barry. Mayor for life. At least mayor until the news papers stopped telling Washington to not vote for him because he was a no good, good for nothing bastard. Even the Simpsons made fun of him. As soon as the press layed off, he was out. Seemed like there was always a scandal with him. Kickbacks, etc. They were like - see, don't tell us we can't elect him!

      Supposedly Bill Clinton had big drug connections when he was Governor. They used to fly the drugs right into his state. Don't know if it's true or not. If it is, then we elected a drug dealer President.

  22. More Taxes!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Increase the TAXES!!! CA can't handle all the poor, they need to increase the taxes.

  23. How long til the invasion? by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Of bums, tramps, druggies looking for free this or that, and the influx of kids driving the housing costs through the roof?

    1. Re:How long til the invasion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without a degree it's going to be tough for Silicon Valley refugees to immigrate. All those high school drops outs will have to keep working on NodeJS in San Francisco.

  24. That's because the faggot rectum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...gets loose from the constant buttfucking. They literally cannot hold in their shit...even with a buttplug!

  25. I thought SF... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...had all the faggots and Toronto had all the frogs.

  26. Trump's finest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Datavirtue is relatively wealthy in a economically depressed part of the country. He boasts about how cheap everything is there but can't figure out why the bank considers his home to be a risky investment. When all your neighbors are a welfare cut away from becoming renters the limousine liberals at the bank decide your house is a risk even when you're white! Unfair!!

    Maybe if he learned about accounting, economics, or business he could figure out how to run his 'small business' and not feel bad after paying the taxes that feed 15% of his state, the 3rd largest consumer of welfare in the country.

  27. Re: Oh no you know what that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because all H1B indians moves there, Turdeau's wet dream achieved. Not so funny for the displaced locals, especially the middle age white males, thw few remaining ...

  28. Real Estate Organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So a real estate organization is an authority on jobs and techiness of areas eh? My call? BALONEY. The assertion may be true or may not be, but a "survey" by a real estate group just isn't a source that properly avoids a critical eye. This could just be baloney to heat up Chinese purchases of real estate in Canada outside of the West Coast. Actually that is likely EXACTLY what this "report" is.

    A real estate group report forecasting the value of property by evaluation of tech job growth is like a primary and secondary school ranking published by the man-boy love association. Just too much impure interest there.

  29. Nothing at *all* to do with the idiot by whitroth · · Score: 1

    In the WH. No, no, nothing here, nothing to do with a national healthcare system (which means corporate benefit costs are vastly less, and don't go up 5%, 10%, 30% every year, as they do here.

    And Toronto just completely banned handguns. I suppose Canadians aren't that afraid of either their government, or of each other.

    Nah, there are no good reasons....

  30. Where are you prices coming from? Space? by BrianMahoney1357 · · Score: 1

    Lots of posts about prices of housing in Toronto, not sure why they're quoting 1.5 million. Average price in the GTA, that's Durham in the east, Halton in the north west, Peel in the west and York, that being Toronto, was under $800,000 CDN. The median is lower than the average, about $150,000 as of July, 2018. Right now, $700,000 CDN is $535,500 USD. Nowhere near the prices posted in some posts here. To be honest, we don't really want Americans moving up here, at least I don't. We have a decent degree of racial harmony, lots of cultures and ethnicities co-mingling and we're pretty happy with that. Our police can be caught profiling but they don't shoot as many African Canadians as are shot in the U.S. We've got our own problems but they pale in comparison to those south of the border. You're in deep, deep dodoo down there but I don't think you realize it. Politics is pretty much a team sport down there, we've got several parties federally and provincially. We actually switch from one to the other on a reasonable frequent basis. We also turf parties that fail to meet our standards. It's not Utopia up here but it's not bad. We don't go into debt when we get sick. Our infrastructure is solid. We're pretty smart about where we send our military to die. Oh, and we don't do the jet thing at every sporting event. Nine times out of ten, our military personnel aren't dying for our 'freedom', they're dying for someone else's freedom. I think the last war we started was .... wait, maybe there wasn't one. If our government started throwing the military in our faces every chance they got, we'd laugh about it then get rid of them. The Guess Who's 'war machine' was apropos then and it is now.

  31. re: cheaper cars by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I know I took a while to respond here, but in case you're still following replies to your posts?

    I agree completely with this other guy who replied to you on this. Buying old, cheap used cars is a fool's errand UNLESS you enjoy working on them yourself AND have the flexibility and free time to do it.

    I spent a LONG time learning that lesson. (Screw those lying bastard mechanics that preach about it always being wiser and cheaper to keep your old vehicle running. That's the line they give you to ensure their pocketbooks stay well lined.)

    I have friends who were employed as engineers in the auto industry, and they'll even tell you they're constantly paid to only engineer vehicle parts to last a certain target number of miles and years of use. If they make it more durable than that, it's considered "over-engineering" it and a cost liability that has to be adjusted by using cheaper/less reliable alternatives. For example, if a plastic gear will do for something like a power window assembly, you can bet they'll choose that over the steel gear that would clearly outlast it. It's lighter weight AND a bit cheaper. Both of those attributes are multiplied by the hundreds of thousands of vehicles they plan on building that way.

    So many of the older cars you see on the roads, making up those statistics about "cars lasting longer these days" have back-stories about all the maintenance costs sunk into them to keep them going. Often, people have a certain sentimental attachment to an older car so they spend more than it's worth to keep it. Other times, they just believe that gamble that, "If I just do this ONE more big repair, it should be good for a while." But the fact is, every part in there is wearing out at the same time. Your 12 year old car that gets a brand new engine still has a 12 year old transmission, heating and cooling system, suspension parts and dashboard gauges and controls, plus sensors of all types. Even the frame/body is only designed to resist rust for so many years. It's likely getting "cancer" from the inside, out, in places like the lower door sills.

    And depreciation costs? Meh... I always try to buy certified pre-owned so the first owner took that big initial depreciation hit, while I'm still getting a vehicle that's more or less in new condition. I've really never been upside-down on a car loan when I purchased one this way ... but obviously, you have to also look out for ripoff dealerships who overcharge for one.

    When I bought my Jeep Wrangler, in fact? I bought brand new and STILL came out with almost 0 depreciation after a few years, because Chrysler kept upping the price for the same vehicle year after year.

  32. Re: cheaper cars by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Buying old, cheap used cars is a fool's errand UNLESS you enjoy working on them yourself AND have the flexibility and free time to do it.

    I agree that buying a car that is too old can cost you more than a newer car, but that doesn't mean you have to buy a new or CPO car.

    My wife and I have bought about 25 cars in our lives. 5 of those were bought new. I have never bought a CPO. I only bought one used car from a dealer. The oldest car I have bought was 40 years old.

    All those used cars have been far cheaper to run when depreciation is considered than the new vehicles. All of them. And I don't do a lot of work on the cars myself (with the exception of the 40-year old car (now 60 years old).

    One car I bought was a Ford Thunderbird. It was 15 years old when I bought it. It cost me $1800. I ran it for 3 years, with one repair (done at a local shop for $500) and at the end of that time, it developed a catastrophic problem, so I scrapped it. So that is less than $800/year. There isn't a new or CPO car in the USA that will cost less than $800/year (apart from your Wrangler), when depreciation is taken into account. Another older car I bought, I ran for 9 months, did zero maintenance and sold it for more than I paid for it.

    My daughter bought a 15-20 year old car a couple of years ago, ran it for two years. No repairs needed, then it got written off in an accident. The insurance company paid her more than she had paid for the car.

    I have a Subaru, which I bought from a private seller. Prior owners had experienced depreciation of about $4000/year on this car. My depreciation has been about $1000/year. Repairs (all done professionally by a local shop) have cost nowhere near $3000/year.

    Also, insurance is more expensive on newer cars.

    I have heard that some manufacturers (eg. Chrysler) design parts with a minimum lifetime of 100,000 miles. However, other manufacturers appear to design cars with the intent that the car should last longer. The vehicle that I have owned with the biggest repair costs: a Chrysler. Perhaps there is a connection between those two facts? In other words, when buying an older car, it's important to consider the manufacturer.

    And depreciation costs? Meh...

    Your "Meh" suggests that you really are not accounting fully for your depreciation costs. Most people don't.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!