Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Resurrect 40,000-Year-Old Worms Buried In Ice (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Gizmodo: Earlier this month, in the journal Doklady Biological Sciences, a team of Russian scientists announced they had apparently discovered ancient nematode worms that were able to resurrect themselves after spending at least 32,000 years buried in permafrost. The discovery, if legitimate, would represent the longest-surviving return from the cold ever seen in a complex, multi-celled organism, dwarfing even the tardigrade. The worms were found among more than 300 samples of frozen soil pulled from the Kolyma River Lowlands in Northeastern Siberia by the researchers. Two of the samples held the worms, with one from a buried squirrel burrow dating back 32,000 years and one from a glacier dating back 40,000 years. After isolating intact nematodes, the scientists kept the samples at 68 degrees Fahrenheit and left them surrounded by food in a petri dish, just to see what would happen. Over the next few weeks, they gradually spotted flickers of life as the worms ate the food and even cloned new family members. These cloned worms were then cultured separately, and they too thrived.

125 comments

  1. A good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are these worms rare or threatened? I hope scientists are considering resurrecting species from this list.

    1. Re:A good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The scientists didn't resurrect anything. The worms just thawed out and weren't dead.

    2. Re:A good start by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      Good luck resurrecting an auroch or a Bali tiger. These worms were merely hibernating.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:A good start by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      Good luck resurrecting an auroch or a Bali tiger. These worms were merely hibernating.

      They should try resurrecting the Jurassic Blue parrot . . . it's just resting . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:A good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You've been saying that for 2 years now and nothing has happened.
      You will keep saying it until 2020 and nothing will happen.
      Then you will keep saying it until 2024 and nothing will happen.
      In the meantime you will start fantasizing about having homo sex with Trump since that's
      always the end result of such obsessive thinking about someone.

    5. Re:A good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it will get a whole lot more fun saying it after he is impeached and frog marched to prison

    6. Re:A good start by Ruede · · Score: 1

      it is more likely that the dems will bring trump into office for a 3rd term

    7. Re:A good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. And Trump isn't even a Republican. He was just able to steal their votes (with their acquiescence) because all of their possible candidates were worthless, just like the Democrats'. Only the Dems had a pretender to the throne. Pretender indeed.

      It's all the same people. But no one seems to see it.

    8. Re:A good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is a traitor. saying everyone is equally treasonous is retarded GOP bullshit. Sorry, he'll die in Federal prison and then you'll understand reality better.

    9. Re:A good start by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      Good luck resurrecting an auroch or a Bali tiger. These worms were merely hibernating.

      They should try resurrecting the Jurassic Blue parrot . . . it's just resting . . .

      Remarkable bird, the Jurassic Blue... beautiful plumage, innit?

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    10. Re: A good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then vote Libertarian as I did.

  2. And in other news... by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was recently fortunate to have an extraordinarily cute, 20-something science student resurrect a 53-year-old worm buried in her....um, never mind.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    1. Re:And in other news... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      And as a scientist you only focus on the worm, of course.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:And in other news... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the support structure benefitting said worm would have negative consequences, and is therefore something to be avoided.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    3. Re:And in other news... by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Let’s not open that can of worms.

    4. Re:And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leans forward, with keen interest Please, proceed with your account...from the beginning. (Waves to waiter) Garçonne! Drinks, please!

  3. Haven't you seen X files? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Haven't you seen X files?

    I want that placed ERASED.

    1. Re: Haven't you seen X files? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds more like the start of a Michael Crichton novel...

  4. Welcome nematode overlords! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, welcome our new nematode overlords.

  5. Bet... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    ...they might be surprised when they see a mobile phone.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  6. For most of the World by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    68 deg F == 20 deg C

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fahrenheit scale is less rounded, but more practical, than the Celsius scale. One degree Celsius jumps from pleasant to hot, and another from hot to hot as hell. The Fahrenheit scale gives smaller and more useful increments as integers, making for more natural conversations about the weather.

         

    2. Re:For most of the World by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      And water freezes at 32 deg, boils at 212 deg... very easy to remember.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of this amazing new invention? They're called Fractions.

    4. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metric people don't do fractions. They decimalize things. No one likes that. I like eight farthings to the half shilling. Get off my lawn!

    5. Re:For most of the World by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what your point is. The number of times I talk about phase transitions of water - pretty low. And then I really only care if there may be ice on the road. Number of times I pay attention to the outside weather, or the thermostat, pretty often.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    6. Re:For most of the World by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      But if you want to turn up the heat in winter you have to press the button on the remote twice!! Celcius is half as many presses, it's just so much more efficient.

    7. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of the decimal point?
      It's a revolutionary idea, I admit, but...

    8. Re:For most of the World by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I like eight farthings to the half shilling.

      So do I, when I'm buying.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's so practical why do only 3 countries use it in the world and why are all 3 3rd world shitholes?

    10. Re:For most of the World by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Metric people don't do fractions. They decimalize things. No one likes that. I like eight farthings to the half shilling. Get off my lawn!

      Would it be twelve farthings to the half shilling (or did you just disprove your own point)?

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:For most of the World by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      68 deg F == 20 deg C

      You mean there are places where this isn’t true?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    12. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And water freezes at 32 deg, boils at 212 deg... very easy to remember.

      Mr. Fahrenheit says: Brine freezes at 0F, and the human body temp is 100F (approx), and thus on his scale distilled water freezes at 32F and it boils at 212F at sea level.

      FTFY

      And every bit as logical as Mr. Celcius' plan, for all the metric snobs.

    13. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The metrically challenged will use any stupid argument to argue their bad historical system is superior. Not that many of those cave-men left, fortunately.

      As opposed to those who have to take off their shoes to count past 10, and are therefore limited to the metric system because they can't comprehend math more complex than adding or removing zeros?

    14. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you want to turn up the heat in winter you have to press the button on the remote twice!! Celcius is half as many presses, it's just so much more efficient.

      Oh snap. You've found the one thing that will convince everyone in America to switch.

      But wait, many of the thermostats in the European hotels I've stayed in had 1/2C increments, so I've had to push the button just as many times as a Fahrenheit thermostat. And a good thing too, because I find 21C too cold, and 22C too warm; I like 21.5C to be perfect for sleeping.

      Sorry, your compelling argument is not so compelling after all.

    15. Re:For most of the World by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      And the ego-challenged poster will use the word 'stupid', a lot ;-)

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    16. Re:For most of the World by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Btw why do you think in TFS the temperature is 68 F? Because 68 F is a nice rounded 20 C ...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    17. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metric people don't do fractions. They decimalize things. No one likes that. I like eight farthings to the half shilling. Get off my lawn!

      Would it be twelve farthings to the half shilling (or did you just disprove your own point)?

      There are 12p in a shilling. So 6p in a half shilling and thus 24 farthings in a "half shilling". But I'll happily give GP 8 farthings all day long for his half shillings. Even better, I'll give him Irish farthings.

      There were 20 shllings in a Pound Sterling, i.e. 240p. Also 29 Knuts in a Sickle, and 17 Sickles in a Galleon."

    18. Re:For most of the World by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      I'm not keen to open a unit war. But seriously, how Brine and body temps are accurate references? Brine is a high-concentration solution of salt in water, to salt solutions ranging from about 3.5% up to about 26%. Body temp differs 3~6% depending on (healthy) people ethnicity, activity etc...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    19. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's so practical why do only 3 countries use it in the world and why are all 3 3rd world shitholes?

      Five actually. And you owe Bahamas, Belize, Cayman Islands, and Palau an apology.

    20. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh snap. You've found the one thing that will convince everyone in America to switch.

      But wait, many of the thermostats in the European hotels I've stayed in had 1/2C increments, so I've had to push the button just as many times as a Fahrenheit thermostat. And a good thing too, because I find 21C too cold, and 22C too warm; I like 21.5C to be perfect for sleeping.

      Sorry, your compelling argument is not so compelling after all.

      21.5C sounds incredibly unhealthy for sleeping, air dry as anything. That temperature is too high for efficient daytime working already unless your profession is dust mite farming.

      In my youth, I got into trouble with my parents when the radiator in my bedroom froze and we had to take a blowtorch to the pipes. Of course, in modern times that cannot happen any more because of thermostat valves opening quite above the freezing point even at "off" setting, and I wouldn't advocate it either. But I doubt you'll ever get invited into an igloo again if you put the thermostat to 21.5C when the host wasn't looking.

    21. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Metric people don't do fractions. They decimalize things. No one likes that. I like eight farthings to the half shilling. Get off my lawn!

      Would it be twelve farthings to the half shilling (or did you just disprove your own point)?

      A half shilling are 6 pence or 24 farthings since there are 96 farthings to the florin.

      But you tell the young people of today, and they won't believe you.

    22. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is just a huge load of crap

    23. Re:For most of the World by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      The scale was based on how humans perceive temperature, 32 may be the freezing point of water but it is not the temp that is intolerable outside in winter. That was determined and set to 0, as well 100 unbearably hot. You know what, those extreme outdoor temps are STILL around the limits of human suffering. For humans and weather it is a perfect scale. Sure metric is great for everything else, but not really for a weather report. Does anyone really like dealing with decimal points for simple weather forcasts?

    24. Re:For most of the World by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 0

      68 deg F == 20 deg C

      You mean there are places where this isn’t true?

      Basing something on the melting and boiling points of water is a moving target as the atmospheric pressure changes. So yes.

    25. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      68 deg F == 20 deg C

      You mean there are places where this isn't true?

      Basing something on the melting and boiling points of water is a moving target as the atmospheric pressure changes. So yes.

      Both Fahrenheit and Celcius are based on freezing and boiling points of water at sea level (a.k.a. ST&P).

      So NO. There is nowhere in the whole damn universe where 68F == 20C. isn't true

      Back to school for you.

    26. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had trouble keeping up with school as compared to your classmates when you were a child, correct?

    27. Re:For most of the World by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      Of course in hotels they do it like that. Otherwise all the Americans who stay keep pestering concierge to have them explain how the ac works.
      Plus you can just imagine all the lawsuits from angry Americans who pressed the button in the night too many times without thinking. Next time just pay the extra for a European room, you will appreciate the difference.

    28. Re: For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      21.5C is called a tropical night if it happens to be that warm outside at night (anything above 20C actually) and its definitely much too warm to sleep. 16C is a good sleeping temp. I hate hotel rooms because you

      * can't set the thermostat below 18C in most if even that low.
      * even at 18C the AC will be blaring away constantly making it impossible to sleep. "White noise" makes me crazy, not sleepy
      * most hotels don't let you open the windows to just let in cool and fresh outside air
      * in most hotels you also don't want to open the windows because you'd hear all the other rooms' AC outside units or the central AC fans or the highway etc.

      All in all most hotels really suck.

    29. Re:For most of the World by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      I've noticed s lot of them still keep the internal temp in degrees C and just show it in F

      You can see the 9/5 if you count along when you press the buttons repeatedly.

    30. Re: For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's crazy. i wouldn't be able to sleep in temperatures that cold. even 20 is pushing in. a nice and humid 25 is perfect for sleeping

    31. Re: For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is patently false. anything below 40Â "F" is unbearably cold

    32. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the need to use it so much kinda destroys the argument that "Celsius is more rounded."

      In common everyday use, one can engage Fahrenheit scales using nice clean integers, whereas doing anything with Celsius requires the use of decimals.
       

    33. Re: For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its all about what you are used to. I never got used to Fahrenheit so for me talking about the weather in F is utterly useless. 68F is that hot? Comfy? Cold? I dunno because 40F and 68F and 80F all make my brain immediately think "ouch way too hot" as any number above 30 triggers my "too hot" reaction from being used to Celsius all my life (thanks to having been in Canada or Europe all my life). You are used to F so for you its the opposite. I need to calculate if I want to use F you for C. Big deal. Stop trying to make the other system bad by constructing reasons for why its bad. You can usually easily deal with whatever you're used to.

      Case in point from Europe I'm used to centimeters. I can estimate distances in meters and centimeters easily because in used to it. Distances are easy in kilometers. Miles? No fracking idea what that is, I gotta calculate. Canada uses metric for roads too. On the other hand, woodworking, reno around the house etc I use inches and feet here in Canada and I can estimate short distances in inches and feet too and do so regularly. Actually the longer I'm in one place the harder it is to accurately judge in the other system. Currently inches feel more natural as I'm in Canada and I overestimate in centimeters.

      Back to temps, I don't care if its 24, 24.5 or 25 for my comfort. All three depend on humidity and wind levels. With 30% relative humidity and a light breeze all these temps are really comfy. Make it no wind and 60% relative humidity and all three suck a lot!

    34. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you will about American but more people are coming then going. Everyone wants to come get education and many stay after they do. They want better lives.

      Funny, for such a shit hole country we sure do attract a lot of migrates.

      Dumbass.

    35. Re:For most of the World by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      Originally Fahrenheit was based on a salty brine solution, it was rebased it to water only sometime after his death. Do the phase changes of that brine scale exactly the same as plain water with atmospheric pressure? I am not a scientist so please elaborate and educate me, since I honestly don't know.

    36. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      38C is unbearably hot??? Maybe if you are Russian, Scandinavian or Canadian, but not so much for the rest of the world :P

      Also, the rest of the planet uses Celsius for weather reports just fine.

    37. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The freezing point of water is almost constant from 0.01 atm to 100 atm, so that point is moot: http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_phase_diagram.html

      The boiling point however changes significantly with pressure, but it doesn't matter either. The SI unit for temperature is the Kelvin, not the Celsius, and the Kelvin scale is defined as setting 0 K as the thermodynamic zero, and the triple point of water as 273.16 K.

    38. Re:For most of the World by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Good point, and that brings up the question of error bars. At 68 F one would assume that it was accurate within half a degree Fahrenheit, at 20 C one would assume it was accurate within 5 degrees Celsius. That's a big difference.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    39. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0 deg F is cold and 100 deg F is hot.
      0 deg C is just a bit chilly and 100 deg C is dead

      Which is more useful for daily life. It is similar to speed limits. 0 to 100 mph is a nice natural scale.

      The point being that while SI units are easy to convert, you rarely need to do so. Meanwhile, redneck units are scaled for practical use. If you are measuring something in feet, it is doubtful you will need to convert it to miles.

    40. Re:For most of the World by HiThere · · Score: 1

      No they don't. And I'm also sure that the official definition of temperature for BOTH scales talks about standard pressure rather than sea level. And that standard pressure is defined in a way that is not geocentric.

      Still, it was based around geocentric concerns in both cases. The refinements are due to concerns about the standard not remaining fixed over time. (But the real problem has been [recently] the precise definition of mass, i.e. the Kilogram, since the pound has been redefined to be based on the metric system. Have you ever tried to count precisely Avogadro's number of atoms of a precisely specified isotope? Think about the problem for a bit.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    41. Re:For most of the World by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

      Basing something on the melting and boiling points of water is a moving target as the atmospheric pressure changes. So yes.

      Which is why the Celsius scale is based on melting(*) and boiling points at a pressure of 1 atm. So no.

      (*) Yeah, I know that was redefined to use the triple point of water

    42. Re:For most of the World by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Yup. A lot of cooking recipes have either converted Celsius or converted and rounded Celsius in them. They start standing out once you notice them.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    43. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Americans could do simple math, they wouldn't need it dumbed down into F in the first place...

    44. Re:For most of the World by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      At 68 F one would assume that it was accurate within half a degree Fahrenheit, at 20 C one would assume it was accurate within 5 degrees Celsius.

      No one would assume 5 degrees. Commercial temperature controls for reptiles in a terrarium are more precise about that.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    45. Re: For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why Americans are destroying the planet by using up 10 times the electricity of normal people.

    46. Re:For most of the World by HiThere · · Score: 1

      We aren't talking about controls here, but about a news article. And I can easily imagine an editor rounding 24.5 degrees to 20 degrees.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    47. Re: For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure you know what error bar means. Sure doesnâ(TM)t mean an arbitrary assumption about precision.

    48. Re:For most of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose we base our temperature system of 0 as the melting point of gallium.

  7. That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    We currently have 70 year old worm living in the White House.

    1. Re:That's nothing. by iggymanz · · Score: 0

      48 year old Slovenian model keeps that worm alive

    2. Re:That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing? This is The Thing!

    3. Re: That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off ivan

    4. Re:That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point I'm seriously considering changing from 3rd party to Trump at 2020 just because the anti-Trump tirade is annoying and I want to see their heads pop like zits.

  8. WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you do this? We mammals donâ(TM)t need to bring more parasites back from extinction.

    1. Re:WHY? by gweihir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It tells us things about how long life could potentially travel through space. It is a bit hard to run a lab-experiment for 40'000 years...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the nerd! It took a while. How low /. has fallen.

    3. Re: WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It tells us things about how long life could potentially travel through space. "
      Not quite, space gets even colder and has radiation as well

    4. Re: WHY? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well, it gets colder, but once your frozen, getting colder just increases the shelf life. Radiation is a problem, but the insides of meteors are shielded from it somewhat.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  9. What could possibly go wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then there's all the running and screaming.

  10. dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do me next!!

  11. The Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks. I saw the John Carpenter movie. I know how this goes.

  12. Check the scientists' blood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you never know what kind of Thing those worms might turn out to be.

  13. Watch out! by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

    This is done by Russians, and this is Putin's attempt to get rid of heaven western world is, and it's superior ideals and superior people by genetically modifying these ancient worms to travel all the way to America (and their overlords, Israel), and attach themselves inside their human hosts after which the human host will start acting as a proxy to do Putin's work on bringing down America.

    If you ignore this warning, Trump will be your president forever.

    1. Re:Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will ignore this warning. While the Democraps are busy filling their diapers and whining, i will be busy amassing wealth and power to get Trump through again.

    2. Re:Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off faggot

    3. Re:Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know games aren’t real life, right?

    4. Re:Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you said before I got Trump to become president through my single-handed Russian hacking.
      Do you dare repeat history?

    5. Re:Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP's point bears repeating. I've always found it amazing how people think it's reasonable to assume something is more sinister simply a Russian person did it. Like a DDOS C&C server being in Russia making it part of some larger conspiracy. Or news coming from RT automatically being an attempt to control the government. If I said that news coming from a paper with a Jewish editor automatically made it suspect, I would quite rightly be called antisemitic. OP makes a good point about bigotry against Russian people.

    6. Re:Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, you really are an old worm. And bitter. I'm hungry, so I will still eat you. Nom nom nom.

  14. Fitting nick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    politicizing basic science makes you look like a bit of a d

  15. it wasn't the scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worms came back all by themselves. All the scientists did was turn up the temperature.

  16. Yikes by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Oh great. Now we have retro worms to worry about?

  17. Brain worms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brain worms!

  18. As Lovecraft said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That is not dead which can eternal lie, and after strange eons even death may die."

  19. I've seen this X-Files episode, we're all doomed by pote · · Score: 1

    DOOOOOMED!

  20. Re:I've seen this X-Files episode, we're all doome by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    Was that the one with the loggers, or do you mean the one with the fluke on the submarine?

  21. Meh, that's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Republicans resurrected a 70+ year old worm to be our president.

  22. Greaaat... by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    Lovely... Russian zombie worms. Actually, that's probably the least of our worries. It does beg the question though... are Russians running out of worms? Is this some new, wild trend in keeping the populace fed? "Let them eat 40,000 year-old dead, zombified worms" just doesn't have the same ring to it as "let them eat cake". Does this make these the new oldest living things on Earth? Or does it not count to be alive, then alive 40,000 years later, if you were dead in the intervening time? Just curious.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  23. Jeff Goldblum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TRIGGERED

  24. Re: I've seen this X-Files episode, we're all doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Itâ(TM)s the first season one that takes place in Northern Alaska. Basically an X-Files cover of Thing. Pretty good episode. I think itâ(TM)s called Ice.

  25. Zombies human next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those zombies worms will be eaten by chicken and zombify them.
    Those zombies chicken will be eaten by humans... and... the world war zombies will start the plague...
    Run humans'!! Zombies are coming to eat your brains!!!

  26. These guys not watch the X-Files "Ice" episode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the episode where scientists unearth ancient parasitic worms from the ice that cause them to murder each other?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_(The_X-Files)

    Not a good idea!

  27. All hail the God Shai-Hulud. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May his passing cleanse the world.

  28. Makes one wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes you wonder what crime they had committed against the state for them to be sentenced to not just the gulag, but to be buried in the permafrost surrounding the gulag!

    In Soviet Russia, scientists resurrect you!

  29. Oldest living thing which is not a plant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, does this qualify as the oldest living thing which is not a tree or a plant?

    1. Re:Oldest living thing which is not a plant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alien life doesn't count.

  30. Don't look behind the curtain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you probably shouldn't look too closely into how they measure the weather and do forecasting etc. Because it's all in C. They just convert it to F at the end so Americans don't get confused and can understand it.

    1. Re:Don't look behind the curtain by HiThere · · Score: 1

      As long as the internal measure is in floats or rationals it would hardly matter.

      FWIW, I use both Fahrenheit and Celsius, depending on what I'm thinking about, and sometimes Kelvin. Use the tool that fits the problem. And the thermostats that I'm familiar with can easily switch the display from Celsius to Fahrenheit or back. I rarely see one that handles Kelvin, though.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Don't look behind the curtain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn you fake nerds are annoying, taking intro CS doesn't make you smart.

  31. only 'murika matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ur funny. eu hotels arent 'murika. only 'murika matters. make 'murika greedy again.

  32. Anyone else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else read the headline as "Scientists Resurrect 40,000-Year-Old WOMAN Buried In Ice "

    Need the coffee to kick in...

  33. Re: WHY? Arrgh!! Homonyms! by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Well, it gets colder, but once you're frozen, getti...

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  34. Re:I've seen this X-Files episode, we're all doome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the host?, who btw came from rusia.

  35. Had to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new resurrected nematode overlords.

  36. Iceworm Special anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool!

    Who is pickling them in alcohol and serving Iceworm Specials?