Slashdot Mirror


New Facial Recognition Tool, Designed For Research Purposes, Tracks Targets Across Different Social Networks (theverge.com)

Researchers at Trustwave on Wednesday released a new open-source tool called Social Mapper, which uses facial recognition to track subjects across social media networks. Designed for security researchers performing social engineering attacks, the system automatically locates profiles on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and other networks based on a name and picture. Unlike tools such as Geofeedia that require access to certain APIs, Social Mapper performs automated manual searches in an instrumented browser window. The Verge: Those searches can already be performed manually, but the automated process means it can be performed far faster and for many people at once. "Performing intelligence gathering online is a time-consuming process," Trustwave explained in a post this morning. "What if it could be automated and done on a mass scale with hundreds or thousands of individuals?"

42 comments

  1. Excellent by bmimatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another reason to nuke social media profiles, if you have them.
    This is only going to snowball and eventually become very difficult to opt out of, if there's no meaningful legislation.
    I am not holding my breath for that though.

    1. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is only going to snowball and eventually become very difficult to opt out of, if there's no meaningful legislation.

      -

      What makes you think "meaningful" legislation is going to make any difference ?

      Laws don't stop people who don't care about the law.

      You must be very young ( or very stupid ) if you believe legislation will make a difference.

    2. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've completely given up on your government and don't even bother to participate anymore, then you have precisely ZERO rights to complain about the state of anything and everything in your country, because I can 100% guarantee you that there are people who participate in your government -- and they probably don't give a fuck what you want, how you want to live, what your values (do you have any?) are, but they do care about their agenda, and if that agenda includes taking away your rights, money, and maybe even your basic civil liberties, and you sit there and say nothing about it? Then you're no better than a farm animal waiting to be slaughtered, never seeing past the end of your own nose, and like an animal, only giving a shit about what you have to eat, being entertained, and getting your genitals serviced. So how about you start giving a fuck enough about what's going on in your own gods-be-damned government to at least talk to your elected representatives and tell them what you think!? Or is it just too much trouble and effort to get your fat overfed ass off the couch and stop playing your video games, watching sports, or whatever time-wasting crap you're wasting time with, to bother?

    3. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or is it just too much trouble and effort to get your fat overfed ass off the couch and stop playing your video games, watching sports, or whatever time-wasting crap you're wasting time with, to bother?

      .

      You should be more careful about insulting people you don't know.

    4. Re: Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I cannot find it in me to care about whatever garbage you typed

    5. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've completely given up on your government and don't even bother to participate ...

      .

      The REAL power in the US is not elected.

      Go ahead and vote. You have no power and you never will. And your vote will make NO difference.

      Thanks for the laughs, you pathetic smart-mouthed loser !!!!

    6. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the AC you are responding to.. but why? You an internet tough guy?

    7. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well said comrade, now how far do i have to crawl to kiss putin's balls.

    8. Re:Excellent by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Go ahead and vote. You have no power and you never will. And your vote will make NO difference.

      If that were the case, wouldn't Hillary have won.....?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re: Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the insults weren't necessary, he/she does have a valid point. Nearly half of eligible voters in the US don't even bother to show up once every two years.

    10. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voting is a fucking joke

    11. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This won't be useful with the younger people, all their profile pics are memes.

    12. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... wouldn't Hillary have won.....?

      You have the power to choose a puppet: In the first case, the president is an employee of congress, not the boss. Next, many laws are little-more than a bill of rights for corporations; that can be changed by a majority in Congress (which Democrats don't have) and the will-power to legislate for everyone (which Democrats don't have).

      During Obama, the Democrats planned to get the Latino vote. Then, their "most experienced" rich, white woman based her ticket to the White House on middle-class, white voters. Latinos tend to believe in socialist-capitalism, so maybe, the Democrat party was screwed, at a national level, regardless.

    13. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand what kind of legislation would be "meaningful" to you. Laws against publishing photos with your face? Laws against looking at photos that people publish voluntarily? Or should it be forbidden for a computer to look at photos, even if people are free to look at them?

  2. Re:recognize this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asking the hard questions. How good is this at recognizing dick pics?

  3. Re:recognize this by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

    Sorry, software is not designed to recognize anything as small as your balls.

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  4. Just once... by x0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...I'd like to read a story where social networks gets less creepy.

    m

    --
    In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    1. Re:Just once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Jeffrey Dahmer Story: An American Nightmare ?

      Mein Kamf ?

      Bataan Death March: A Survivor's Account ?

      These are all stories that are less creepy. How about:

      1984 by George Orwell ?

      .. oh wait .. sorry .. that's this story.

  5. What kind of idiot by bobstreo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    puts their picture in social media? I mean, if you're a sports star or actor, sure, but for everyone else, just stick to pictures of cats and your latest meal.

    And if you use the same name in different social media, well derp...

    1. Re:What kind of idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tracks targets. Targets are not necessarily users.

    2. Re:What kind of idiot by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      puts their picture in social media?

      Hey stupid, how else would people I barely know see where I am vacationing and what the food I'm eating looks like? And yeah, I need to be in the picture to prove I was there / I ate it.

    3. Re:What kind of idiot by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Tracks targets. Targets are not necessarily users.

      So they are tracking my cat ?

    4. Re:What kind of idiot by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      So they are tracking my cat ?

      No, the raccoon.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  6. This is just to save lives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Target walking north on Washington."

    "We are bringing up Metro."

    "Getting in an Uber."

    "Stand by...Kevin Phelps, 394 Broadway, 34, single, 5 traffic, no miz or felonies, social good...hold...no links, 12 crosses."

    "Advise."

    (pause)

    "Advised we cannot take the shot without more crosses. Most are not recent."

    1. Re:This is just to save lives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crosses?

  7. Prior Existing IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure that Veridian Dynamics is already working on this. I know I saw a documentary about it a few years ago.
    Anyone else remember that?

  8. faccia brutta by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is why I keep getting Brad Pitt's text messages by accident.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  9. Dis-TrustWave .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Designed for security researchers performing social engineering attacks, the system automatically locates profiles on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and other networks based on a name and picture.

    And who the fuck gave them permission to do that?

    Social media is bad enough, this shit is ridiculous.

    OK, if you work for TrustWave, you've forfeited all rights to privacy. Fuck them, fuck their family, fuck their friends ... all of them should have every aspect of their lives published on the internet. If they think it's fair to grab our personal information, they no longer have a right to keep theirs private. That goes for everyone who works for analytics companies.

    Enough of this shit.

    Crap like this is why I don't use social media, and I sure as fuck don't go posting pictures of myself online.

    The internet is beyond repair at this point. It's purely become a tool of corporations and governments. I'll use it for the things I need it for, I'll block the shit out of any trackers without a second thought, but all of this social media crap is just garbage.

    If I'm suspicious because I don't have a Facebook profile, then we really have lost the game.

    1. Re:Dis-TrustWave .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything you said is absolutely true.
      The internet is fucking shit now...
      This is a publicity stunt from TrustWave and hopefully gets them in trouble or hacked...
      "For Security Researchers" my ass...
      You mean for hackers you fucking piece's of shit.

    2. Re:Dis-TrustWave .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20180808_114623.11345 NLP Threat Analysis Module... execution complete. Score: 73.
      20180808_114623.11346 Social Media FastLane Linker running...
      20180808_114623.11346 Social Media FastLane Linker Failure. Obfuscated user.
      20180808_114623.11348 NLP Style Classifier. Cluster ID 593458-234-2394-23947
      20180808_114623.11349 Cluster Association Module: 47,375 primary records detected. Resolving...
      20180808_114623.11350 User Identified. Primary Shadow Profile ID: 234978-A23FNP-SDF8MNZ-BPOQM
      20180808_114623.11350 Response Code: 437 (Observe and monitor at level 3 potential threat, flag for random screening)

    3. Re:Dis-TrustWave .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at the python source to this... Looks like really shitty scripting!

      global linkedin_username
      global linkedin_password
      linkedin_username = ""
      linkedin_password = ""
      global facebook_username
      global facebook_password
      facebook_username = ""
      facebook_password = ""
      global twitter_username
      global twitter_password
      twitter_username = ""
      twitter_password = ""
      global instagram_username
      global instagram_password
      instagram_username = ""
      instagram_password = ""
      global google_username
      global google_password

  10. Publicity Stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a publicity stunt, the code is complete crap!

  11. Coding Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need a programming job at TrustWave since they obviously accept horribly shitty code!

  12. Common tool in the online dating industry by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    Online dating sites have been using tools like this internally for years to track users' activity on competitors' sites.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Common tool in the online dating industry by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      And what would they do with that knowledge? Seems awful hard to act upon.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Common tool in the online dating industry by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      I thought match.com owned most of the sites.

  13. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that must be the secret to getting content on the front page of Slashdot...
    Come up with a controversial and shady idea for a tool, write it as shitty as possible producing the most horrible code you can that reveals your limited understanding of the programming language you've written it in and release it to Sub Class C News site.

  14. Contrary to WA State Constitution and Canada's by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    let alone the EU GPDR.

    Stop doing this stuff.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Contrary to WA State Constitution and Canada's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not in WA State, canada, or the EU, so I doubt they care.

  15. Do not want! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not want YOU FUCKERS. Do NOT WANT!

  16. Tineye and Google Images do this already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great for doxxing. This is doxxing - New! Improved! With extra Scripty McScriptyFace!