Slashdot Mirror


Google Remotely Changed the Settings on a Bunch of Phones Running Android 9 Pie (theverge.com)

Last week, a mix of people who own Google Pixel phones and other devices running Android 9 Pie noticed that the software's Battery Saver feature had been switched on -- seemingly all by itself. And oddly, this was happening when the phones were near a full charge, not when the battery was low. From a report: Initially it was assumed that this was some kind of minor bug in the latest version of Android, which was only released a few weeks ago. Some users thought they might've just enabled Battery Saver without realizing. But it was actually Google at fault. The company posted a message on Reddit last night acknowledging "an internal experiment to test battery saving features that was mistakenly rolled out to more users than intended." So Google had remotely -- and accidentally -- changed a phone setting for a bunch of real-world customers. Several staffers at The Verge experienced the issue. "We have now rolled battery saver settings back to default. Please configure to your liking," the Pixel team wrote on Reddit before apologizing for the error.

91 comments

  1. All your phones by Cornwallis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    are belong to us.

  2. Next Week's Headlines by mentil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In other news, Android users are mysteriously finding their Location Services and Google history settings turned to the 'on' position, even if they had previously manually turned them off. /s

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Next Week's Headlines by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I actually like both. I use the Sony Lifelogger app, although wish there was a better one out there (that one is too focused on fitness and they nerfed the timeline several years ago).

      What I really want from Google is a way to set a percentage charge limit. There's no point to putting excess wear on my battery on days when I'm not going to need a 100% charge. The rate of reactions with the electrolyte (and deposition of deposits on the anode) is proportional to the voltage; the lower the voltage you store your battery at, the lower the rate of degradation. I've seen an app to let you impose charge limits but it requires root and doesn't work on all phones.

      Even better than just a percentage charge limit would be scheduled charges, preferably with different schedules for different times of day. So e.g. for nighttime charges, to charge to 60% as soon as it's plugged in, then to wait until 20 minutes before my alarm to charge to a target percentage - but for daytime charges, to charge immediately to the target percentage.

      --
      They carry weapons and they know if you've been bad or good. Not everybody's good, but everyone tries.
    2. Re: Next Week's Headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's too bad for you, I don't trade privacy and security for convenience

    3. Re: Next Week's Headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not alone on the charge limit. I'd like to be able to have mine stop at 95%.

    4. Re:Next Week's Headlines by infolation · · Score: 1

      In other news, Android users are mysteriously finding their Location Services and Google history settings turned to the 'on' position, even if they had previously manually turned them off. /s

      Location settings are not under Location Services or Google history. They're in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'.

    5. Re: Next Week's Headlines by jnork · · Score: 1

      https://play.google.com/store/...

      Not as good as what you're asking for, but a decent stopgap. I admit I've been having problems with it on Pie. Just now got an update, we'll see if it's fixed.

      There are others, I picked this because it was versatile and let me choose music for my alarm. YMMV.

      --
      Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    6. Re:Next Week's Headlines by swillden · · Score: 1

      In other news, Android users are mysteriously finding their Location Services and Google history settings turned to the 'on' position, even if they had previously manually turned them off. /s

      Just in case anyone is confused, this did not happen.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Next Week's Headlines by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I actually like both. I use the Sony Lifelogger app, although wish there was a better one out there (that one is too focused on fitness and they nerfed the timeline several years ago).

      If there's a company more evil than tech company 'x', it's Sony, hands down. They hate their customers and actively work to screw them over. Why support them?

      What I really want from Google is a way to set a percentage charge limit. There's no point to putting excess wear on my battery on days when I'm not going to need a 100% charge.

      Well, there's a reason Android phones have "better" battery life than comparable iphones. There's also a reason most Android phones have user replaceable batteries. :)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    8. Re:Next Week's Headlines by Rei · · Score: 1

      They hate their customers and actively work to screw them over. Why support them?

      I probably won't after the Xperia XV2 series. With the XV3 they're moving to an AMOLED display; their use of LCD displays has been one of the main reasons I've stuck with them. I hate AMOLED; looks nice and pretty when you buy it, but after a year or two the color balance gets messed up and the whites end up off-white. Not an issue I guess if you swap phones every year, but as someone who doesn't, it's really annoying. Beyond that, they're generally good phones. XV2 Premium's camera setup for low light is especially nice; they have a separate greyscale camera specifically for capturing light in low-light conditions, and correlate the intensity data from it to the colour data from the primary camera. ISO 51200 ;) Also has 960fps 1080p slow motion and a good 3d capture stack.

      Companies "doing evil" is really pretty close to the bottom of the list of my concerns when shopping for a smartphone.

      --
      They carry weapons and they know if you've been bad or good. Not everybody's good, but everyone tries.
    9. Re:Next Week's Headlines by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      They hate their customers and actively work to screw them over. Why support them?

      Companies "doing evil" is really pretty close to the bottom of the list of my concerns when shopping for a smartphone.

      Generally, I'd agree. But Sony has been consistently very anti-consumer in their actions and activities, with things like the CD rootkit being truly notable as such activity was never legal.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    10. Re:Next Week's Headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..yet.

    11. Re: Next Week's Headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm amazed Android doesn't have better charge control settings already. With Samsung overcharging their batteries to 4.35V (normally lithium ions are charged to 4.2V max), and having so many batteries fail that they had to recall the Galaxy Note S7 line, AND still having serious battery failures, you'd think enough would be enough already...

  3. Who needs a backdoor? by meist3r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I have the keys to the entire apartment complex! No seriously, there was a light on in your bedroom. I HAD to come in and turn that off.

    1. Re: Who needs a backdoor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we do this for your own good! Our data indicates you needed our intervention"

      -Google

  4. News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word news starts with "new" for a reason.

    Maybe the slogan should change to Olds for nerds

    1. Re:News for nerds? by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Maybe the slogan should change to Olds for nerds

      Well, compared to the usual political bullshit, this article was news for nerds. Mega tech company does something, film at 11.

      As for Olds for nerds? This nerd would very much like to have a G-body Cutlass Supreme, tastefully done to appear stock while having enough go, stop and handling to be a lot of fun. I'm thinking a Rocket 350 fed by a quad of Weber twin-chokes, into a Tremec five-speed on the floor, with leather interiors and some kind of tasteful alloy wheels with period-looking tall-ish sidewall tires.

      What's your Olds for Nerds?

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:News for nerds? by dickplaus · · Score: 1

      As for Olds for nerds? This nerd would very much like to have a G-body Cutlass Supreme, tastefully done to appear stock while having enough go, stop and handling to be a lot of fun. I'm thinking a Rocket 350 fed by a quad of Weber twin-chokes, into a Tremec five-speed on the floor, with leather interiors and some kind of tasteful alloy wheels with period-looking tall-ish sidewall tires.

      What's your Olds for Nerds?

      Ah... I have an 81 Olds with a 350 (Chev ZZ4/355HP) with a Tremec five-speed and a 9'' rear that I just completed. Looks mostly stock (other than a few interior details and some minor trim). Talk about fast and fun!

  5. Google, the Big Brother by SigmundFloyd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they can do that, it doesn't seem too far fetched that they could also turn on the phone's cameras and microphones at will.

    --
    Knowledge is power; knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Google, the Big Brother by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Not too far fetched at all, rather more slamdunkfetched. Anything you'd hate Google to be able to do remotely to your device?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Google, the Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's why i sit naked on my phone when i'm not using it. If they want to go there, that's their choice.

    3. Re:Google, the Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already listen you via microphone 24/7, but of course according to Google, only to catch "Ok, google". It is up to each customer to either believe Google for that or not.

    4. Re: Google, the Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly

      It'll be like the Facebook data collection thing all over again

      "What do you mean google products listens and collects conversation data! They're just a search engine company"

    5. Re:Google, the Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know who else can do that? Every single app that you have granted camera and microphone access to!

      Really the only problem I see here isn't that Google can "remotely" do things, it's that permissions settings are a black list rather than a white list. That is, an app has access to the camera, microphone, etc unless you go into settings and explicitly deny access for every app you don't want to have that access.

    6. Re:Google, the Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is more likely that they released a new version that changed the existing settings.

      But sure, they could easily provide an update that takes control of your phone. So the question becomes, now that you know this, what will you do? Your options:
      A) Live your life as dangerously as you have so far
      B) Disable automatic updates, verify every new version by hand to see that there is nothing harmful coming in.
      C) Write your own software, just to be sure.

    7. Re: Google, the Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gps is captured and your position is logged when you open google maps even if your device has gps disabled.

      Sue them.

    8. Re:Google, the Big Brother by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      If they can do that, it doesn't seem too far fetched that they could also turn on the phone's cameras and microphones at will.

      Why stop your worrying there? They can also send a fleet of self driving cars to ram into your house in them middle of the night.

      You know why Google won't turn on your camera remotely? They like money. They like their stock price. They are a services company. IF they did that, there'd be a huge public backlash. They need people to keep using their services.

  6. So cool by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Isn't is awesome how Google has complete control over your "property"?

    1. Re:So cool by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Isn't is awesome how Google has complete control over your "property"?

      Yes, an operating system you choose to run on your property generally has control over the hardware. In other news, Microsoft has control over my gaming PC, and Linux has control over my work PC.

    2. Re:So cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux fixes known security holes rather than deliberately adding them. This is not equivalent to Google or Microsoft.

    3. Re:So cool by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Linux fixes known security holes rather than deliberately adding them. This is not equivalent to Google or Microsoft.

      Because nobody has ever introduced a bug in a Linux update. Oh wait. You are right, it's not equivalent. I've had *way* worse bugs in Linux than this.

      But anyway, why don't you run Linux on your phone then and be done with it?

  7. more users than intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry if you were not in a hurricane and did not need this, you insensitive clods.

  8. REDDIT? Not Google Plus? by cheekyboy · · Score: 0

    Google, please sack all employees who
    use twitter and reddit, and not GPlus.

    https://plus.google.com/104629...

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  9. Any word on how it was done? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is there any information on how the settings change was made?

    Obviously, OS updates could change settings(sometimes by legitimate necessity since an OS update can add new settings that need a default of some kind, remove features that used to have settings but no longer need them; or modify a feature enough that there isn't a clear answer for what 'preserving' the old setting would mean); so if it was done by pushing out an OS update with the wrong settings that would be sloppy but not fundamentally sinister.

    If, however, Google has sent MDM-like remote control(probably in Google Play Services somewhere), and they used that to toggle the setting things get rather less innocent.

    1. Re:Any word on how it was done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google can push out changes in many ways. How they do it doesn't make it any less evil. Google's "Announcement" is pure bullshit anyway. They cannot push any change out without going through a changemangement process which means mangement was not only aware of the change but authorized it. A single team let alone a single tech can't just make changes like this.

      Google got caught, nothing more.

    2. Re:Any word on how it was done? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Settings application was updated.

    3. Re:Any word on how it was done? by koick · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have a rooted Pixel 2 running Android 9 Pie on Project Fi network. Since my phone is rooted, I don't take OTA updates and instead update them manually from the factory images they provide every month (under developer options, I even have 'automatic system updates' turned off). My device had its battery saver activated last week. Like others, I guess thought it was a bug, and simply turned off battery saver. Yeah, I'd guess that command they sent came through Google Play Services. Their ability to do this doesn't give me much comfort, but then again I'm not that surprised.

    4. Re:Any word on how it was done? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Most likely, this was an update to the Settings app.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Any word on how it was done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Google Play Services - the omnipotent app that does automatically update itself regardless of your settings. Go look at its permissions in the settings :)

    6. Re:Any word on how it was done? by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 2

      Most likely, this was an update to the Settings app.

      You seem to have missed where they said:

      "..., I even have 'automatic system updates' turned off..."

    7. Re:Any word on how it was done? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Most likely, this was an update to the Settings app.

      You seem to have missed where they said:

      "..., I even have 'automatic system updates' turned off..."

      The Settings app gets updated from the Play store like any other app. Well, like any other pre-installed app.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:Any word on how it was done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It genuinely needs pretty much all of those permissions to do stuff on the device

      That said, when google pulls this shit then you have to ask about their internal competency, plus what a court order can do.

      I'm now treating my android device as if it has no security at all (because, well, if google can flip settings remotely, then it doesn't really have any security from people changing things I wont want them to (or by extension, retrieving information)) does it.

      This is actually worse than backdooring encryption.

    9. Re:Any word on how it was done? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Google can push out changes in many ways. How they do it doesn't make it any less evil. Google's "Announcement" is pure bullshit anyway. They cannot push any change out without going through a changemangement process which means mangement was not only aware of the change but authorized it. A single team let alone a single tech can't just make changes like this.

      So your theory is that Google has some devious plan to make our batteries last longer? Pure evil.

    10. Re:Any word on how it was done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one of the MANY reasons that I don't have a "smart" phone!

    11. Re:Any word on how it was done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your theory is that Google has some devious plan to make our batteries last longer? Pure evil.

      Orrr... slow down devices so people think they need new phones? See Apple.

      They pushed out a change without telling users.

    12. Re:Any word on how it was done? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Orrr... slow down devices so people think they need new phones? See Apple.

      Apple slowed down the phones because their aging batteries couldn't handle the power requirements of the CPU spike. Sure, point out that's a hardware design flaw but it's not some conspiracy to sell new phones.

      They pushed out a change without telling users.

      What are you even saying. They pushed out code with a bug (obviously) that changed a setting. Are you suggesting they should have sent a code review to all of their users before they pushed the change? Of course they have the ability to change the way the software works on the device, in the same way anyone that writes software distributed via OTA can do the same.

      If you are saying they installed an OTA without user consent, no they didn't. Auto app updates are an user selected option and the default is false. System updates do not install automatically.

      Software has bugs. Every software engineer knows that. When a company owns it and fixes it quickly that's just about the best possible outcome.

  10. The problem with auto installs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is the problem with auto updates. Not even one notification that something is being updated or changed. At the very least the end owner of said device should at least be notified what was updated. Without having to sift through blogs or forums to find answers.

    1. Re:The problem with auto installs by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      This is the problem with auto updates.

      The user had to explicitly turn on auto updates.

  11. Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enuf said.

  12. So Basically, hack that system and you have it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice. Thanks for leaving such a fucking gaping hole in our phones that you are able to do such a thing.

    And to think, all those crypto guys worried about broken-by-design crypto. You don't even fucking need that with this setup!

    (You have to be superuser privs to change those settings, google has this remotely. You're fucked)

  13. Re: So Basically, hack that system and you have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You notice that Google and Android phone manufacturers have never been taken to court for law enforcement officials to get access to the data on the phones.

  14. Welcome to the new Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You pay to own a device, but in reality you're only a renter.

  15. And this is why I'm done with smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple, Google, Samsung, it matters not. They all think they retain control over your device.

    A device that should be 100% under my control, since I paid for it.

    Fuck them all.

  16. ph-1 changed mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and I just HAPPENED to look in settings and noticed that my battery icon in the status bar was indicating battery saver?! I had just finished charging it a bit before. So, I go to check battery and notice battery saver, turn on at 99%?! WTF?! I HAD HAD it set to turn on at 15%!

    So, I just reset it back to 15% and didn't think much of it at the time other than maybe it had happened w/the September update and I just didn't notice UNTIL I saw these stories popping up. I also seem to recall some similar thread on the essential subreddit as well... but not specifically that Google had changed it, but like me speculating the Sept update...

    Also had the fscked up swiping, although in my case I just cleared storage and cache at which point it was back to 'normal'...

  17. Welcome to 2018 by mrops · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google writes the OS for the phones that drives all the hardware. I think this one is blown out of proportion. Yes, I would rather not have them change settings like this, it was a mistake, they admitted and that is more important. Apple, Samsung and Microsoft have same capability on their front, even Tesla can do the same for their cars.

    If you really want to stop this, install one of many open source initiative in the Android world and take control of your device, maybe pursue your elected official to regulate such updates. In the mean time, they have the capability to do whatever they want remotely, welcome to 2018.

    1. Re: Welcome to 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uncke google turned the camera on and got a video of your sister in the shower. They own the os. It was a mistake. Just like the other 537 videos on pornhub. It won't happen again.

    2. Re:Welcome to 2018 by vtcodger · · Score: 0

      I'm getting pretty fed up with Google for lots of reasons. But at least they apologized. I can't recall a whole lot of apologies from Microsoft, Apple ("You're holding it wrong"), et. al. for their screwups.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    3. Re:Welcome to 2018 by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Doing something shitty that people didn't know for sure they could do without user authorization isn't fixed with an "oops, our bad." And whataboutism doesn't make it any better either.

      Google, et. al. should not be able to arbitrarily change settings on my device without my consent to accept an update. Period. Anything else is unacceptable. What if they "accidentally" re-enable data collection and disable privacy settings on "a wider set of users than they intended" as their next screwup? Will that be fixed with "oops, our bad" as well?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re: Welcome to 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did his sister have her phone in the shower?

    5. Re: Welcome to 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have pie, I have updates disabled, my battery optimiser did not change settings.

    6. Re: Welcome to 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have pie and I'm rooted, so no auto-updates. I've also disabled some system apps like the google app, play movies, play music and such. I had the option enabled automatically and missed a few work alerts because of this. I though I was to blame for enabling powersave.

    7. Re:Welcome to 2018 by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      What if they "accidentally" re-enable data collection and disable privacy settings on "a wider set of users than they intended" as their next screwup?

      Man, forget whataboutism here we have whatifism.

      Complain about Google changing the privacy settings on your phone when it actually happens. I don't know about you, but my life hasn't run out of problems where I need to imagine new ones because they haven't been proved impossible.

      But anyway, what happens if they disable privacy settings on your phone? A huge backlash and tremendous negative press. That's why I "trust" them not to do it. They like money. They like their stock price. They are going to do as little as possible to effect that negatively.

    8. Re:Welcome to 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing something shitty that people didn't know for sure they could do without user authorization isn't fixed with an "oops, our bad." And whataboutism doesn't make it any better either.

      It's not whataboutism to say that yeah, computers, phones, software of all sorts will come with upgrades that sometimes, intentionally or unintentionally, overwrite user settings. It's happened for decades, it's commonly happened to me on Windows, on Mac, on Linux, iphone, android, etc. It's pretty common to try to preserve user settings, but to roll things back to default if your changes are extensive enough.

      And "Whataboutism" as a phrase, as a concept, is overrated. It seems to be the usual deflection when you call out someone for engaging in behavior you routinely engage in yourself.

    9. Re:Welcome to 2018 by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      Google, et. al. should not be able to arbitrarily change settings on my device without my consent to accept an update. Period. Anything else is unacceptable. What if they "accidentally" re-enable data collection and disable privacy settings on "a wider set of users than they intended" as their next screwup? Will that be fixed with "oops, our bad" as well?

      What you mean like Microsoft and Windows 10 does with every update?

    10. Re:Welcome to 2018 by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You missed the point.

      They should not have the capability to change settings on my device without my consent. Period.

      I don't care about the why or why not of a singular event of using the capability. I care about the capability existing at all.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    11. Re:Welcome to 2018 by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      They should not have the capability to change settings on my device without my consent. Period.

      Are you complaining that the software installed on your phone for the purpose of changing settings has changed the settings? Obviously there has to be software on your phone with the capability to change the settings. That's what makes them settings.

      You are acting like there's some master console at Google HQ with your name and all your device's settings. Where are you getting that info? This was a bug. Their software had a bug that incorrectly changed the setting. Software has bugs. Get used to it.

    12. Re:Welcome to 2018 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't possibly be this stupid.

    13. Re:Welcome to 2018 by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      When you are reduced you saying "you're dumb" like an angry 7 year old and providing no facts or even an argument, the conversation's over.

      You don't know software or software development, and you may not even have a grasp on technology. You might be used to terrorizing the stupid people in your life with your obvious technical prowess, but it won't work here, AC. That's why the OP here that agrees with me is mod'd insightful. A few AC trolls with zero rated posts won't change that. You don't even believe in what you say enough to post non-anonymously.

  18. Instant Apps Updates by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

    I have automatic updating turned off (all of it, Apps & OS). I have manual updating set for Wifi only.

    Explain to me then why over the last year I have caught Instant Apps updating on 4G LTE at least 3 times. Those are the times I was looking at my phone and found it was doing this. I managed to catch a screenshot a couple times. How many more times is Google forcing updates which I have explicitly opted out of?

  19. Even More Unsettling Than I'd Thought by tungstencoil · · Score: 1

    This happened to me. I've never used battery saver; when the power icon changed, I had to look it up.

    It was in close proximity with the 9-Pie upgrade. First unsettling bit was that I assumed it was a new setting, e.g. that power saver had more granular options, and my previous selection was mapped to this. This has happened with other things before; after all, when behavior changes, it changes, right?

    Second was how quickly I forgot. Not only did I forget something seemed odd, but I forgot when they fixed it. I liken it to when I get a new phone; I try to arrange icons like I had them. I can tell something is different, but not exactly what. I eventually become used to the 'new' way.

    This scares me, personally, because of how quickly I adapt to this. I just absorb the change, and don't really think I should dig further, investigate, change my own behavior. If I don't address it in the first 30 minutes or so, I just shrug my shoulders - whether I'm aware of this or not. The implications for this kind of stuff are kind of scary. I'm shocked at myself; I consider 'me' to be a little more aware.

  20. Err, rolled back everyone too? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The story indicated they rolled everyone back to the default.

    What about people who had actually turned on power saver themselves, did they have to go back and turn it on again?

    It seems like flipping it either direction without the user knowing is bad.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Err, rolled back everyone too? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      What about people who had actually turned on power saver themselves, did they have to go back and turn it on again?

      It seems they just blanket turned it off for everyone. When I noticed the problem (battery saver on at 99%), I changed it back to the default of 15%. I just checked now and found it turned off completely.

    2. Re:Err, rolled back everyone too? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Yikes. Well, at least you just have to set it back once and they probably won't be making that mistake again for a long while...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Err, rolled back everyone too? by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

      Well that explains why I've not seen my P2 turning on Battery Saver (I'd configured 25% both initially and after the Google screwup). Like others it had been switched on at 99% and I thought I'd done it somehow - random touches or something. Could they not think of maybe popping up a notification on the affected device? They seem to be happy to pop up 230987 others for useless crap, I don't see how a "Hey, Battery Saver has been turned off by Google due to a system fault, click to change your settings" wouldn't have been reasonable (actually I do, that would be admitting fault without backlash and prodding, which is impossible for any company nowadays it seems).

  21. Google is going through your underwear drawer by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    They're sneaking into your house at night when you're asleep and going through your underwear drawer, touching each and every one, and making little notes about them.
    That's about how creeped out you should be if you own an Android phone -- or ANY smartphone.
    You were warned, more than once, and you ignored it. Now you see the consequences of your lack of action: you bought and paid for a phone, but it's not YOURS, never was, never will be. Google will go through your underwear drawer whenver they feel like it, and there is nothing you can do to stop them -- other than get rid of your smartphone.

    1. Re:Google is going through your underwear drawer by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      They're sneaking into your house at night when you're asleep and going through your underwear drawer

      Seriously dude. A bug that changed a battery setting is same as going through your underwear drawer?

      you bought and paid for a phone, but it's not YOURS, never was, never will be

      The phone is yours. You choose to run Google apps on it. You are free to uninstall those apps. You may not like the experience. It's your choice though. Life rarely comes without compromises.

    2. Re:Google is going through your underwear drawer by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      If they can change settings on your phone without your permission then you're not in control of it, plain and simple. You own it, you should have complete control over it. Clearly you don't.

    3. Re:Google is going through your underwear drawer by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      If they can change settings on your phone without your permission then you're not in control of it, plain and simple. You own it, you should have complete control over it. Clearly you don't.

      I don't know if you are trolling or if you are technically illiterate. If you don't like that software has control over some aspects of a computing device, you are supremely confused about the nature of computing. I suggest you do not dig much deeper into this topic or you panties are really going to get in a bunch.

    4. Re:Google is going through your underwear drawer by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1
      Nah, I think you're the one who doesn't know what he's talking about -- or you're just in denial.

      He actually believes he has control over his smartphone

      Hilarious.

    5. Re:Google is going through your underwear drawer by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Hard to take you seriously when you can't even explain yourself. Cheers.

  22. SQL by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Someone ran an update query with the where clause missing. And they fixed it by running another update query.
    This is why you have History tables so you can fix mistakes by going back to the last setting not the default setting.
    Given Google's open plan offices and high noise level its only natural that its difficult to concentrate and this kind of stuff happens.
    You should trust your data to Microsoft. They have offices for everyone

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:SQL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... not really... They've been moving to the "Open Office" plan and several buildings that have been renovated now have everyone on a team sitting in the same room on desks next to each other. Not even with Cubicle Walls. :|

  23. And idiots from IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    think that Microsoft is the bad guy.

  24. Google just did an Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...

  25. Maps traffic is based on Location Services by Solandri · · Score: 1

    I had to think it through before reluctantly leaving Location Services on. I use traffic on Google Maps all the time. The only way Maps can show which roads are backed up is by the location data sent from phones of people sitting in traffic. So if it weren't for people having it on, there'd be no way to see the current amount of traffic via Google Maps. If I turned it off, I'd essentially be like a leecher for a torrent. Or someone who expects to receive blood from the hospital when injured, but never donates blood. So after much consideration, I turned Location Services on.

    My Google history is turned off. You should at least be glad Google allows you to turn these off if you like. Unlike Amazon, Facebook, and Apple which collect this data regardless of your wishes.