Slashdot Mirror


Box-Office Giant Ticketmaster Recruits Pros For Secret Scalper Program (www.cbc.ca)

Box-office giant Ticketmaster is recruiting professional scalpers who cheat its own system to expand its resale business and squeeze more money out of fans, a CBC News/Toronto Star investigation reveals. The report adds: In July, the news outlets sent a pair of reporters undercover to Ticket Summit 2018, a ticketing and live entertainment convention at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas. Posing as scalpers and equipped with hidden cameras, the journalists were pitched on Ticketmaster's professional reseller program. Company representatives told them Ticketmaster's resale division turns a blind eye to scalpers who use ticket-buying bots and fake identities to snatch up tickets and then resell them on the site for inflated prices. Those pricey resale tickets include extra fees for Ticketmaster. "I have brokers that have literally a couple of hundred accounts," one sales representative said. "It's not something that we look at or report." CBC shared its findings with Alan Cross, a veteran music journalist and host of the radio program The Ongoing History of New Music, who suspects the ticket-buying public will be far from impressed: "This is going to be a public relations nightmare." He said there have been "whispers of this in the ticket-selling community, but it's never been outlined quite like this before."

143 comments

  1. Ticketmaster is like... by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ticketmaster is like the Devil fucked himself, had a child, and that child grew up without any toys reading only out of context Scrooge McDuck comic panels.

    If at all possible I try not to buy tickets from them, and don't go to many concerts any more because that is becoming increasingly harder to avoid.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Ticketmaster is like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I recently bought some tickets and needed to get rid of a few legitimately.

      What ticketmaster now does is force people who are not "professional resellers" into mobile only tickets that are harder to sell. On top of that they won't let you resell under the retail price, only higher. This way if they have extra tickets, they can sell theirs for cheaper before anyone in their right mind would by yours. The only way I was able to sell my ticket was by going to Stubhub where I was allowed to sell them at a discounted price and get rid of them.

    2. Re:Ticketmaster is like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are much too kind to T*master. They've been around for a _long_ time -
      I remember them in the 70's, but I often wonder how they got the monopoly
      that they have today.

      CAP === 'restful'

    3. Re:Ticketmaster is like... by AsylumWraith · · Score: 1

      Weird. I sold a pair of tickets to Ozzy in Dallas, (something came up, I won't be able to go, :() for under retail, (by $11/ticket,) using their mobile app, just last week.

    4. Re:Ticketmaster is like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The appropriate government response to this is to REVOKE THEIR CORPORATE CHARTER.

      This is what should happen when a corporation breaks the law. They are put to death.

      They are not a person. There will be no tears.

    5. Re:Ticketmaster is like... by Build6 · · Score: 1

      Pearl Jam tried to go after them a long time back, and lost

      http://ultimateclassicrock.com...

  2. Just boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People need to stop buying tickets over MSRP. Don't support that shit or it'll only continue.

  3. Assholes. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suppose at the same time they're still busting non-company scalpers and insisting they're prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law?
    Seems to me that Ticketmaster should put in for a corporate name change to East India Company. Then they can call their payrolled scalpers 'privateers'.

    Isn't this that they're doing illegal? If not it should be. I hope they go bankrupt over this.

  4. Scalping tickets to the Washington redskins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then drinking firewater and fuckin squaws in the teepee

  5. F Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ticketmaster is the reason I never go to concerts.

    1. Re: F Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mom is dead you're boning a skeleton bruh

    2. Re: F Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still counts for cashing in his V card.

    3. Re:F Them by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      Ticketmaster is the reason I never go to concerts.

      Ticketmaster and scalpers... You know that if a large concert is sold out within an hour that the scalpers have figured out how to game the system. Now we find out that some scalpers are officially given an inside track by Ticketmaster. I guess that no one should be surprised by the corporate greed on display, but the fact that this is legal is what bugs me the most.

    4. Re:F Them by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Based on the article you shouldn't be differentiating the scalpers and ticketmaster because according to the article they are working together.

    5. Re:F Them by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily legal, fraud = obtaining money with deception. It sounds to me that if they're getting money from scalpers then they could potentially be defrauding the event managers.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    6. Re:F Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What should bug you is that ticket prices are not sold at their true market value to begin with, which would eliminate this whole mess.

    7. Re:F Them by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid there was this company that would high young people to drive around in an unmarked white van and approach strangers. In the van would be some merchandise... electronics or such, that the driver would claim was "lost" in shipment and they'd sell to you for a discount.

      I called the police on them once, and I was told they knew about them and it wasn't illegal.

    8. Re:F Them by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      And the goods were sold new, with usual warranty? Company had actual headquarters, contact information?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:F Them by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      And the goods were sold new, with usual warranty? Company had actual headquarters, contact information?

      Talking up the fantastic warranty wasn't part of the sales pitch.

  6. Mafia shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to be gutted by this.

  7. Does this surprise anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ticketmaster is an evil monopoly just *begging* to be regulated or broken up.

    That they create and monetize the secondary market is hardly surprising.

    1. Re:Does this surprise anyone? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yet the regulators had no problem with them and Live Nation (another spawn of the devil) merging. Who didn't see this coming with no competition?

    2. Re:Does this surprise anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Though I won't argue them being evil, they're hardly a monopoly. The last four concerts I went to, two of them the ticket sales were handled by Altitude, one was AXS and the last, we were in the area of the venue so we just went directly to their box office and avoided these peoples fees entirely.

  8. Another PR nightmare that doesn't matter by dirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, the public will not be happy, but what are we going to do? TicketBastard pretty much has a monopoly on concert tickets. It's not like I can go to another ticket vendor to get tickets, if they are selling them they are the only one selling them. And it's not like bands have a lot of options because so many venues are owned by TicketBastard. Unless the government steps in and starts regulating shitty, scammy business practices (not likely, especially not with this administration) there is no consequences to being a shitty company.

    --

    "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    1. Re:Another PR nightmare that doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They'll be fined $millions, then ticket prices will triple.

    2. Re:Another PR nightmare that doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could actually enforce antitrust laws.

      So yeah, it's completely impossible to solve this as it would require the courts to do the right thing for once.

    3. Re:Another PR nightmare that doesn't matter by phalse+phace · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe Amazon will one day getting into the ticket business.

      Watch Out Ticketmaster: Amazon In Talks To Offer Event Ticketing In US

    4. Re:Another PR nightmare that doesn't matter by phalse+phace · · Score: 2

      They'll be fined $millions, then ticket prices will triple.

      They'll be fined and customers will be given worthless discounts on future ticket purchases. And Ticketmaster wins again.

    5. Re:Another PR nightmare that doesn't matter by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >Yes, the public will not be happy, but what are we going to do?

      Unlikely to happen, but if everyone refused to buy scalped, or re-sold tickets of any form, the pre-scalped concerts would stand empty and some change might result.
       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    6. Re:Another PR nightmare that doesn't matter by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this. Why do so many people put up with TicketBastard? It's like music fans are so fanatic they'd submit to being raped, literally raped not just "wallet raped", if that meant they got tickets to that concert they're just dying to see. They're like freshmen who let fraternities and sororities haze them within an inch of their lives. The people have the power to stop this insanity, but enough choose to live with it for TicketBastard to survive.

      I can count on one hand the number of concerts I've attended. I'm averaging a bit less than one concert per decade.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    7. Re:Another PR nightmare that doesn't matter by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Yes, then I'm sure everything will be unicorns and rainbows.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  9. TM is the perfect example of the dark side by bjdevil66 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..of free markets, corporate greed and (most importantly) lack of accountability.

    I wonder what would happen if the Sherman Anti-trust Act was aimed at Ticketmaster. They have a virtual monopoly on their business model.

    1. Re:TM is the perfect example of the dark side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      TM is the perfect example of a monopoly, and what happens once one is allowed to exist. It is most definitely NOT an example of a free market. A market that is dominated by a monopoly is the opposite of a free market. In order for a market to qualify as free, there must be no barriers to entry. A market owned by a monopoly has impenetrable barriers to entry.

      So, there is your lesson in economic for the day.

      Forcing a breakup of TM would go a long way to making that specific market free again.

    2. Re:TM is the perfect example of the dark side by magarity · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In addition to what the AC said about barriers to entry, a free market also requires (reasonably) equal information available to all parties. The existence of a secret scalpers' support program was not known by the end customers.

    3. Re:TM is the perfect example of the dark side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but it's hardly surprising. By the time sales open to the public a huge portion of the tickets are already sold and the few remaining tickets get sold out ridiculously quickly. TM not knowing how that happens would be a bit of a shock.

    4. Re:TM is the perfect example of the dark side by Hasaf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You wrote all that without even once using the phrase "Market Failure." However, neither side in our dual party has any interest in imposing regulations or forcing competition (forcing competition is little more than creating market conditions that allow competitors to arise, thus promoting a free market; not being in opposition to it).

      One side feels that the magic of the market is all that is needed. The other side sees these tickets as nothing more than a luxury item, in no need of being addressed. Applying the sacrificial lamb principal, someone will have to die before it is on the screen of anyone in a position to address it. Frankly, I don't see that happening soon, after all, they are just concert tickets.

    5. Re:TM is the perfect example of the dark side by organgtool · · Score: 1

      Free markets lead to monopolies. This is easy to remember with the mnemonic "big companies are free to unleash ant-competitive behavior across the market." Perhaps you're thinking of "fair markets" but the only way to achieve those is to regulate the big players, which violates the concept of a "free market".

    6. Re: TM is the perfect example of the dark side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So for resold tickets does ticketmaster also avoid giving consumers a refund if the show is cancelled?

    7. Re: TM is the perfect example of the dark side by Type44Q · · Score: 0

      Bullshit; IP Laws and regulatory capture lead to monopolies.

    8. Re: TM is the perfect example of the dark side by organgtool · · Score: 2

      I never said that free markets were the only source of monopolies. Regulating markets is a lot like regulating vitamins in your diet: too little or too much tend to produce very similar symptoms.

    9. Re:TM is the perfect example of the dark side by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...The other side sees these tickets as nothing more than a luxury item, in no need of being addressed.

      And also, the entertainment industry is an important contributor to the party, equivalent to what oil and military contractors are to the Republicans. That's why Ticketmaster, RIAA and copyright unto the heat death of the universe get so much love from the Party Of The People.

    10. Re:TM is the perfect example of the dark side by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      I wonder what would happen if the Sherman Anti-trust Act was aimed at Ticketmaster. They have a virtual monopoly on their business model.

      Ticketmaster was allowed to merge with Live Nation in 2010. So their virtual monopoly has the blessing of the US Justice Department.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    11. Re:TM is the perfect example of the dark side by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      TM is the perfect example of a monopoly, and what happens once one is allowed to exist.

      Not quite. Remember these guys? Not saying they're better, but you've got to pick your poison.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    12. Re:TM is the perfect example of the dark side by dryeo · · Score: 2

      The latest copyright updates were just passed unanimously by Congress. The Republicans are pushing copyright (and patents) in NAFTA and wishing they'd stuck with the TPP. I'd say both your parties are in thrall to the entertainment industry.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    13. Re: TM is the perfect example of the dark side by dryeo · · Score: 1

      And which one led to Ticketmaster's monopoly? Enforcing contracts?

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    14. Re: TM is the perfect example of the dark side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I never said that free markets were the only source of monopolies. Regulating markets is a lot like regulating vitamins in your diet: too little or too much tend to produce very similar symptoms."
      I know something about vitamins--that is an assertion I've never heard before.
      "Too much" needs a better definition. Twice the "daily value"? 100 times?
      Taking 14-16 mg of niacin a day is enough to prevent pellegra. Increasing that amount will cause the niacin flush in most people. Some people flush at 50mg, some people don't at 3,000 mg. I will assert that nobody flushes at 10mg.
      Setting aside you drift into vitamins, I agree that free markets are not the only source of monopolies--not. What free market are you talking about? Put the following adjectives in front of fee market; the adjective may be more important than the fact it is 'free market': regulated, mercantile, crony, piratical, profiteering, or just plan vile, evil, conquering, or maybe socially conscious, Catholic Worker, (now that's an oxymoron). Then the followings markets, or un-markets can have monopolies, but can they regulated to include completition? Socialist, communist, and various versions. I remember reading where the Soviet Union had competition between factories for issues such as productivity...although the story I heard was that the winner of the most productive shoe factory did it my making all one size and one foot (left) women's shoe. Economic situations are organic and evolve and mutate, the result is a large plethora of possible phenomena, many unique.
        See Eat the Rich, by P. J. O'Rourke, comments that no country has a 'pure' economic system, and many are held together by ad hoc band aids, duct tape, and bailing wire, and none are sustainable. Also see comments in Skunk Works: A Personal Memoir... Ben Rich, (2nd head of Lockheed Skunk Works) where he comments that the US Military Industrial economic sphere was anything but pure capitalism. He explains that there used to be 4 to 6 companies vying to make the next military plane. Sometimes the contract winner did not have the best plane, but the military leaders saw a benefit in keeping all 4 or 6 companies in the black, and awarded contracts to keep a faltering company afloat. Then Congress passed a new bean counter regulation, and in a few years the number was down to 2 or 3, and he saw that was not a good thing. Even though he was the head of one of the company's secret labs.

    15. Re: TM is the perfect example of the dark side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read an article about TM and scalping somewhere 5 or 15 years ago. Years ago TM created a computer program that could sell thousands of tickets for an event in real time. We're talking something like 50,000 or 100,000 tickets that go on sale at 10 AM and sell out in 12 minutes, without selling duplicate tickets or leaving blocks of unsold tickets or simply crashing. Neat trick. No other company could do that. One of their competitors tried and their system crashed and totally botched ticket sales for some big rock event. This was decades ago.
      Of course, in some cases the hysteria of 'gotta get the tickets' before they sell out increases sales. But it still begs the question, if the event is 90 days in the future, do you need to do it all in 12 minutes?
      Today: I don't know if any other company has the computing ability to compete in doing that.
      But TM is still on my list of companies I hate to do biz with.

  10. Convert to Auction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Open bidding
    2. Everybody bids what they are willing to pay for tickets
    3. Close bidding
    4. Starting with highest bid, in descending order:
    4a. Collect bid amount
    4b. Allow bidder to choose seat or request bid refund
    5. Repeat from 4 until all seats are sold

    Scalpers? Everybody already bid what they would have paid. By bidding higher, the scalper is pricing themselves out of their own market.
    Bots? It's either useless scalping (see previous line), or uselessly holding a spot only to request a bid refund.

    1. Re:Convert to Auction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why don't the artists perform for more days if there is more demand? Instead of performing 2 days, perform for 5 days.

    2. Re:Convert to Auction by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I think there is a more appropriate auction style for concert tickets -- the "Dutch" auction style.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Convert to Auction by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      While that sounds good at first, there will always be an opportunity to make money to sell tickets for something when the event is close at hand, rather than when tickets first go on sale...

      You can't wait to hold the auction until close to the time of the event because then no-one can book travel not being sure if they have a ticket or not.

      I'm not sure there is a great answer for scalpers other than doing whatever you can to make sure no-one can buy large quantities of tickets without careful vetting (you still want groups to be able to buy blocks of tickets after all).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Convert to Auction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup, the good old reverse auction is a simple solution to this problem.

    5. Re:Convert to Auction by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      It would work for individual seats. But how would it work for a party of 3 to sit together. I have given up on many concerts by being frustrated by the ticket buying process, even when I was willing to spend a little more, eg. to treat my parents to tickets for a show, it would be easier to buy 3 cars.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    6. Re:Convert to Auction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they do. They're touring. They have to leave to get to their next venue. You can spend a few extra days in plunketville or get over to the big city.

    7. Re:Convert to Auction by swb · · Score: 2

      An auction style process for selling tickets makes the most sense, keeping the price very high initially and only dropping prices once demand falls below some threshold.

      The real market failure here is that ticket face values are too cheap, the actual price many people are willing too pay is much higher than what the face value says. Scalping and resale markets wouldn't exist if the face value was the market equilibrium price.

      What I don't understand is why *artists* let this happen and give away much of the profit to scalpers or ticketmaster.

      If you're Taylor Swift and you sell out 2 shows in an hour, why not add shows until you wind up with a non-sellout? If the last show doesn't meet your touring costs, cancel it. The artist will make more money doing this. Raise supply to meet demand.

      I know raising ticket prices isn't popular and people are pissed that "real fans" can't see a concert for the price they want to pay, but unless you raise prices or increase supply you will have scalping.

      There's only two reasons I see why artists won't increase supply (perform more). One is they're just lazy and don't want to perform more. Touring sounds grueling generally, so maybe that's true but I'm guessing that doing 25% more shows or whatever isn't going to kill them. They can space out dates, lengthen the tour, etc, to make it less demanding. Touring isn't *that* grueling for top-tier acts with access to luxury hotels, private planes, and assistants who keep them supplied with anything they want.

      The other is manufacturing demand -- the artist is only "popular" because ZOMG TICKETS ARE SOLD OUT. They intentionally limit supply to generate demand. The cynic in me thinks this is probably the case, although I question if this dynamic really works as well as they think given how much outrage there is over ticket prices, scalping, etc. All those problems go away AND the artist makes more money if they play more shows.

      I'm sure there's some kind of argument against more shows based on venue availability, but given that so many tour dates are announced months in advance it sounds like they'd have no problem picking slots with facility availability.

    8. Re:Convert to Auction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... It looks better on the "resume" if the last 10 shows were sold out
      (because they only performed for 2 days in each of the 5 cities) rather than
      perform 3 or 4 days and not have the shows "sold out". Sure, attendance
      would probably be higher, but that's not how the marketers think... Also,
      there are probably real-life scheduling issues - if they played extra days, would
      fans be able to attend on those days (i.e. they have jobs, etc.)?

      CAP === 'happens'

    9. Re:Convert to Auction by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's been done. Particularly to break the back of Ticketmaster. Keep adding shows until they don't sell out. Leave the first two shows empty and TM tholding worthless tickets, for which the act go PAID.

      But the acts don't really care that much.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Convert to Auction by swb · · Score: 1

      There's no good reason I can think of that doesn't boil down to artificially generated demand and marketing perception.

      But even this doesn't make sense. How does a bunch of disappointed fans who can't see the show due to shortage-driven ticket price inflation improve their fan experience?

      Are there really people who want to see Taylor Swift or some other pop star mostly because tickets are hard to get? "I really wanted to see her but the tickets were easy to get, so now I don't want to go" -- I mean that doesn't even make sense.

      It's not like pop stars also couldn't simply cancel dates that were less than 80% full if they played multiple nights in the same town.

      The BS about venue scheduling or other logistics doesn't make much sense, either, they plan most high level concerts MONTHS in advance, including ticket sales, and can probably pretty easily coordinate tours with venue availability for consecutive nights, including booking slightly smaller venues to avoid partially full venues.

      The only thing that MIGHT make sense is capitalizing on "buzz" and trying to get to as many markets as possible before the latest album loses popularity. Extended stays in some towns would slow the tour's geographic progress, but usually a hot star will do world tours that take most of a year.

      I just don't get how any possibly negatives make "give all the money to scalpers and ticketmaster" a better alternative. Just play more shows and sell more tickets.

    11. Re:Convert to Auction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But no one would bid if they couldn't book any travel plans. So, you close the initial auction, then you'll a reseller market for the tickets sold and a fixed time added to bid on unsold tickets. Tickets can be sold up to the end of the concert (or whatever). The highest prices are achieved when the maximum number people are bidding, which would be well before the event.

    12. Re:Convert to Auction by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Sometimes bands want to sell their tickets to their fans (relatively) cheap.The other year here, the Tragically Hip's lead singer/writer came down with brain cancer and did a farewell tour. They were quite pissed off at Ticketmaster as they wanted to sell the tickets for a reasonable amount to allow their average fan to buy them.
      Also when you have brain cancer and 6 months to live, and want to hit a bunch of cities, you can't really just keep adding shows. Even the average band that is not terminal still is up against the logistics of planning a big tour ahead of time and not having time to add more shows. If you're planning on 200+ cities in a year, you really can't add more then the odd show here and there and wanting the odd day off is not being lazy.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    13. Re:Convert to Auction by sjames · · Score: 1

      Have you seen an actual tour schedule? They may just do 1 or two shows in your town, but that's out of 6 months or longer touring. Then they need to find time to recover and then compose and record their next album.

    14. Re:Convert to Auction by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 1

      Regardless of how the price is determined, it is clear that for many events there is a large market for tickets at prices far above the original price from the primary ticket vendor. Usually, scalper prices are at least double or more. It means that in a free-market or auction sale, people would pay even higher prices than today. If that's worth it just for the sake of getting rid of the third party scalper market is more a question of moral.

    15. Re:Convert to Auction by swb · · Score: 1

      They wanted to price their product below market demand and limit market supply and wondered why they had problems with scalping? I mean the lack of fundamental economics is as much a problem with these artists as anything else.

      200+ cities? That's a global tour for a major artist who may not hit all 50 states and will often only hit 1 city in many states.

      Only smaller bands with more cult followings would realistically try to hit 200 cities in the US, and even then that's 4x per state -- how many cities are they really going to visit in Alaska, Wyoming, Idaho, Nebraska, Kansas...?

      Bottom line this is an economics problem of supply and demand, not a Ticketmaster problem. Not that Ticketmaster doesn't suck, they're just exploiting artists' marketing-driven logic and lack of economics understanding.

      If the artists really cared about the fans, they would sell tickets directly to fans and travel with some kind of circus tent they could setup on whatever patch of open ground could be leased. Bypass Ticketmaster, their local monopoly contracts on venues, the whole thing.

    16. Re:Convert to Auction by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Not everything is about money. Your last paragraph is a good idea though it is weather dependent, which doesn't always co-operate up here in Canada.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    17. Re:Convert to Auction by Agripa · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is why *artists* let this happen and give away much of the profit to scalpers or ticketmaster.

      The artists are under the false impression that if they lower their ticket prices below equilibrium, then their fans who cannot pay equilibrium will be able to buy the tickets allowing the artist to gain goodwill. In practice they are just transferring their profits to unofficial and now official scalpers.

      The goodwill argument as merit and sometimes shows up in other industries. Smith & Wesson for instance sold .44 magnum model 29 revolvers below equilibrium because they believed that selling them for the optimum price would have alienated customers.

    18. Re:Convert to Auction by swb · · Score: 1

      Everything being sold for currency just happens to be mostly about money.

      Those circus tents can be heated with forced air heaters. They set them up here in Minnesota, and we're as cold as most of populated Canada.

  11. Antitrust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isnt this a textbook case of illegal monopolistic collusion?

  12. And how many will go to jail? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many of the scalpers will likely go to jail, BUT, this was a program being admined by Ticketmaster itself. Nearly all states have anti-scalping laws on the books. As such, Ticketmaster employees that KNEW about this should be going to prison (aiding/abetting or participating). BUT, I am guessing that not a ONE will see prison, esp the executives, even though they were almost certainly in on it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:And how many will go to jail? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Nearly all states have anti-scalping laws on the books

      How do those stand up against Right of First Sale, anyway?

      I bought it, it should be mine to do with as I please.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:And how many will go to jail? by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:And how many will go to jail? by ilctoh · · Score: 1

      Many of the scalpers will likely go to jail, BUT, this was a program being admined by Ticketmaster itself. Nearly all states have anti-scalping laws on the books. As such, Ticketmaster employees that KNEW about this should be going to prison (aiding/abetting or participating). BUT, I am guessing that not a ONE will see prison, esp the executives, even though they were almost certainly in on it.

      Not everything that is illegal is punishable by prison time. And I would not expect scalping concert tickets to carry a penalty of prison time, nor would I want the tax payers to bear the costs associated with imprisoning someone convicted of scalping.

      Ideally, this crime would be punished by levying a hefty fine against Ticketmaster, and investing that money into something which benefits society as a whole.

      --
      How many slashes would a slashdot dot, if a slashdot could dot slashes?
    4. Re: And how many will go to jail? by nasor · · Score: 1

      Ticket scalping is legal in most states (including Nevada, where the convention was held).

    5. Re:And how many will go to jail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly all states have anti-scalping laws on the books.

      So is it just lucky they used the states that don't?
      Seems everyone is smarter than you.

    6. Re:And how many will go to jail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the article? It is covered by CBC News/Toronto Star which might give you a hint this isn't in the USA.

      "These questions are even more pertinent in Canada because, unlike in the United States, we do not have a clearly defined “first sale” doctrine, particularly with respect to copyright law. "
      http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/first-sale-doctrine-and-canadian-law

      So, the Canadian laws apply in this situation.

  13. They have a convention? by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    Why does Ticketmaster have a convention? They control something north of 90% of the ticket market in the US; it is nearly impossible to go to a concert or professional sporting event anywhere in this country without them making money off of you. Who are they having a convention with?

    This sounds like just a charade they put on to try to convince people that there is competition in this market or that consumers have choice.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:They have a convention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Without reading the article, etc...

      Conventions have more than one purpose. Sometimes, the entire purpose of a convention is to pad pockets. To show people a good time, while also receiving deductions as it is advertising/business cost.

      Think -- little gifts when you show. Free rooms. Free food. Free shows, etc. Even cash in the form of gift cards.

      It's a way to KEEP business, year after year, because "the little guy" can't compete / come close to the show you put on...

    2. Re:They have a convention? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The way I heard it on the CBC today, it was a scalpers convention that Ticketmaster attended, not a Ticketmaster convention that scalpers attended.
      The surprising thing is that scalpers are organized enough to have a convention.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:They have a convention? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Why does Ticketmaster have a convention? They control something north of 90% of the ticket market in the US; it is nearly impossible to go to a concert or professional sporting event anywhere in this country without them making money off of you. Who are they having a convention with?

      Do you mean why do they control so many venues? Ticketmaster controls the market so well that the venues have to deal with them if they want to remain in business.

      Edwards Theaters in California did the same thing. Within the area they controlled, they required film distributors to sell new releases only to them. Competing theaters in their area had to wait weeks and over time, Edwards bought them for low prices as they went out of business.

  14. There is a reason i dont go to concerts anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that reason is ticketmonster.

  15. Obligatory Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a model that encourages a perfect mix of the rich and the gullible.

  16. And yet you people keep paying by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OMG, I better pay $300 a cheapo ticket to see some fat 50 year olds sing songs from my childhood

    these people were fun when my mom hated them, now they are just like all other old people

    1. Re:And yet you people keep paying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, I better pay $300 a cheapo ticket to see some fat 50 year olds sing songs from my childhood

      these people were fun when my mom hated them, now they are just like all other old people

      I was thinking of something like this as well, but more along the lines of the entire concert going scene being on a downward spiral anyway.

      A long time ago, you had bands that played instruments. Since that is less and less the case, what exactly would you be going to see in about 30 years when today's young artists are in their 50s?

  17. Scalper? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I thought the s-word was as insensitive as the n-word.
    But anyway, Ticketmaster is no sensitivity champion.

  18. This is called illegal wiretapping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when are the reporters going to jail for illegal wiretapping?

  19. All TicketMaster needs to do.... by forkfail · · Score: 2

    .... is rename themselves TicketParent, and all will be forgiven by us, the TicketChildren, I'm sure.

    --
    Check your premises.
    1. Re:All TicketMaster needs to do.... by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      Way underrated comment. Wish I had mod points today.

    2. Re:All TicketMaster needs to do.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, TicketSlave.

  20. And the boycott continues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure there's some great A/V experiences I'm missing out on by refusing to purchase through Ticketmaster, however... a stand must be taken.

    And... there's always Youtube, or the 'official' live recordings online to boot.

    To be continued....

  21. Double-dipping on fees by sinij · · Score: 1

    While public has very little recourse against this, artists and labels do. TM is effectively selling tickets multiple times, getting their cut multiple times, but paying artists only for the original ticket sale.

    1. Re:Double-dipping on fees by fonos · · Score: 1

      Artists and labels don't have that much recourse. Most big venues in the US are owned by LiveNation, the parent company of Ticketmaster. You play at a Ticketmaster venue, Ticketmaster gets to sell the tickets.

    2. Re:Double-dipping on fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhhhh, what? Most big venues in the US are public buildings. Seriously, almost certainly you can rent out your local football stadium. Now, if you can afford the rental fee and the staffing and fulfilling some of the minimum requirements is another story. But if a public bond was taken out with tax payer approval to build the thing, the tax payers can rent the facility. Football teams obviously get dibs when booking during football season, but yeah, it's no different than renting a public park for an afternoon event, albeit more expensive. They may have contracted Ticketmaster to handle their box office, but that does not mean Ticketmaster owns the venue.

  22. Disencorporation is the ONLY solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nuke them from orbit. Teach the rest of those fuckers something..

    1. Re:Disencorporation is the ONLY solution. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      It's the only way to be sure.

  23. Soooo cute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll hit puberty soon son.

  24. StubHub by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tried reselling some tickets on Ticketmaster for a concert we couldn't make it to because it seemed easier to just do it through their website. They were up there for several weeks without selling. When i tried to drop the price of the tickets the week before the concert to try and get rid of them i discovered the Ticketmaster site wouldn't let me drop them below a certain amount (an amount that i believe was higher than what i'd initially paid for them.) Maybe there was some way to get around the artificial limit, but if so i couldn't figure out how. I'd say that maybe they wanted to insure a minimum level of fees for themselves, but if the ticket is priced too high to sell they're not going to get _any_ fee, so that seems counter-productive.

    So i canceled that offer and switched the tickets over to StubHub, which had a much better UI and let me lower the ticket prices to whatever i wanted. (I ended up managing to sell them about an hour before the concert for about $200 less than i originally paid for them after getting into a negative bidding war with someone else =P)

    I'd strongly recommend checking out StubHub and any other ticket resellers before resorting to TicketMaster, especially after hearing this news.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:StubHub by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried reselling some tickets on Ticketmaster for a concert we couldn't make it to because it seemed easier to just do it through their website. They were up there for several weeks without selling. When i tried to drop the price of the tickets the week before the concert to try and get rid of them i discovered the Ticketmaster site wouldn't let me drop them below a certain amount (an amount that i believe was higher than what i'd initially paid for them.) Maybe there was some way to get around the artificial limit, but if so i couldn't figure out how. I'd say that maybe they wanted to insure a minimum level of fees for themselves, but if the ticket is priced too high to sell they're not going to get _any_ fee, so that seems counter-productive.

      They wanted to ensure that they sold all of their tickets before anyone would buy yours. Ticketmaster already had your X dollars. Why would they settle for a fraction of X when they can get X from another patron? Even better, they can just keep making new tickets to oversell the venue, never sell your tickets, and no one is the wiser!

    2. Re:StubHub by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      You're right, in retrospect that's an obvious incentive for them =P

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    3. Re:StubHub by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Silly question perhaps, but couldn't you just put them up on eBay?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:StubHub by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      You could, but...

      1: from what i understand it can be hard to gain traction in ebay if you don't have an established account with some good reviews. With StubHub if you're going with the electronic option (which most people do) then the buyer knows that something at least resembling a real ticket has already been uploaded and they have some recourse if it turns out to be invalid.

      And 2: discoverability in ebay seems rather poor. StubHub has listings for most big concerts already and has seating charts for most venues and will give you a fairly good idea of where each of the tickets for sale is located. (Honestly i've only sold tickets through StubHub so far, but it seems like the UI for buying tickets may be more useable than that of Ticketmaster itself.)

      Of course you may be paying a higher fee to StubHub than ebay (though certainly not as high as TicketMaster) so i guess it depends on how in demand you think the tickets are and thus how hard people will be looking for them.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  25. #METOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Various executives from Ticketmaster gangraped me and thousands of other children when I was only five. They also sold tickets to other people who stood in line to rape me. Everyone at the executive at Ticketmaster needs to be jailed for child rape.

    1. Re: #METOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the accusations COMMENCE!!!

    2. Re: #METOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why Chris claims to be 350# and a power lifter? To stop the ticket show? No one will ever know....

      Wait, it is "no one will ever care".

  26. When it comes to Capitalism, this is not a bug. by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    This is one of the undocumented features of Capitalism, or its logical conclusion, if you will.

    In publicly traded corporations, (and probably privately owned ones too,) the ONLY metrics of success involve MONEY, mostly something called ROI, return on investment, and dividends, stock value, etc.

    When it is true, (and it is,) that a company could make more money, both up-front, or near-term, and in the end, (long term,) killing you and your family in broad daylight in front of a hundred witnesses, with cameras rolling, they’d do it unhesitatingly. The ONLY thing that might stop them, (and in practical reality, what DOES stop them,) is the fact that the actual employee pulling the trigger, and probably whoever told him to do it, would risk going to jail.

    IF, however, there were no risk of that, the streets would run red with profit.

    It is specifically BECAUSE profit, and related things I’ve mentioned above, are the only drivers that this is the case. It’s why companies make and sell cigarettes, loaded with chemicals that are there to addict you hopelessly, and why advertising exists. It’s why companies dump toxic chemicals into your family’s air and drinking water, even when that ends up killing them, (because there’s no one trigger-man who can go to jail,) because doing so makes them more money.

    Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not decrying greed, private ownership of the “means of production,” or a completly decentralized approach to resource allocation and industrial decisionmaking regarding what exactly to bring to market. However, the result we see is a natural consequence of the system we have. There’s no need to round up the “filthy rich,” line them up against a wall, and shoot them dead. To fix this, we simply need to find an effective means to make the wellbeing of the people in the community, in the state, the country, and the world, a bigger, more important factor than money, in judging the success of a corporation. Then, implement that.

    Social media would SEEM, via public shaming, for example, to be a vehicle for this BUT... it hasn’t, I don't think, lived up to its promise, because of problems with the design. Even WERE this effective, all it would do, through the very same evolutionary processes that made this species (and all others,) is create a new strain that exists without shame, that is impervious to any kind of criticism.

    Some would argue that such a breed already, regrettably, exists. Some would argue further that the system did not breed that constellation of personality traits into being, but I’ll tell you... the system sure does seem to reward that kind of person disproportionately, which is sad, when you stop and think about it, because that kind of person often seems to have a disproportionate ability to inflict tremendous damage upon the world around them, and the people who have to live in it.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:When it comes to Capitalism, this is not a bug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To fix this, we simply need to find an effective means to make the wellbeing of the people in the community, in the state, the country, and the world, a bigger, more important factor than money, in judging the success of a corporation. Then, implement that."

      That would be communism, which is the only sociopolitical / economic system that supports the welfare of the people over profit.

    2. Re:When it comes to Capitalism, this is not a bug. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Communism is brutal dictatorship disguised as Social Justice. It appeals to fools and villains.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:When it comes to Capitalism, this is not a bug. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      You can go ahead and quote the parts of the communist manifesto that talk about promotion of violence and monarchy.

  27. Ticketmaster is just responding to what you want.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like Ticketmaster's ways, don't buy from them. Skip the show, tell the artists why. Ticketmaster isn't doing anything wrong other than responding to customer demand. If people want to pay for higher priced tickets, let them. In fact, it might be a good thing to just auction tickets off, similar to how Austin landlords use Rentberry so they keep with the market.

  28. Re: Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, there's a life saving medicine malaria victims can get for free, if they are willing to bare-knuckle fight each other. And, Ticketmaster provides the ticket sales to those events. So, your indignation to this travesty only hurts these poor souls, you uncaring monster!

  29. The last concert I went to by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    The venue fees, ticketshafter fees, and I don't remember what other fees, added up to more than the cost of the ticket itself.

    There'$ a very good rea$on why that'$ the la$t concert I buy a ticket for.

    1. Re: The last concert I went to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't a fee. It was a service payment. And it wasn't a concert. It was a public bathroom. And it wasn't Ticketmaster. It was a hooker on meth.

  30. Re:Ticketmaster is just responding to what you wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Ticketmaster isn't doing anything wrong

    This is exactly why uber-capitalists and lolbertarians should die a thousand horrible deaths, I'll get started today!

  31. I used to consult for a scalping company... by Jahoda · · Score: 1

    ...a MAJOR one in Houston, Texas. Shelves and shelves, hastily constructed, loaded with workstations (this was pre-virtualization, can't imagine what it is now), just sniping tickets from the ticketmaster website one after another. And these people were not smart enough to "game" this system.

    1. Re:I used to consult for a scalping company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a bullshit story. If you are not using blockchain and AI for the scalping then you're not serious about stealing people's money

  32. Let me play devils advocate for a moment... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
    As frustrating and expensive for concert and event goers this is, there is one small consideration worth thinking about. Scalpers have always been part of the ticket buying market. I remember as a kid seeing guys standing outside Maple Leaf Gardens hawking tickets to that days Toronto Marlies. Back then, you had to buy tickets at the kiosk and they set ceilings on how many tickets you could buy. All that meant was that professional scalpers paid friends, family and even the homeless to stand in line and each buy the maximum. (plus, they would also buy tickets off people who decided not to go after all, but that was a small fraction of their ticket supply)

    Think of tickets to a venue as a physical form of DRM, only ticket holders can get in to see the show. Scalpers just slipped into that place between supply and demand. In that light, Ticketmasters decision to cooperate with the scalpers can be seen as a "can't beat them, might as well join them" sort of thing. Doing it this way allows Ticketmaster (as the article says) to extract a bit more profit from the ticket sales and at no risk to themselves. If the event isn't as popular as expected, it's the scalpers who take it in the teeth in the form of tickets that they can't resell. Ticketmaster not only gets to sell unwanted tickets at full price, they also get to collect that bulk sales fee.

    What I'm going to be interested in finding out is if the contracts with the various acts and performers includes their share of these extra fees. If Ticketmaster and the scalpers can sell tickets over retail price, that means the fans value attending the performance that much. That is a direct expression of the value of the artists in question. If people are willing to pay 150% of the retail price for a floor ticket for The Who, that means The Who is just that much more popular and should be getting paid more as a result. And I think that is the line of argument the fans need to bring to the artists attention: "These middlemen are making more money off you and you're not getting a piece of it." If enough big headliners with enough clout demand all of that extra revenue, you'll see Ticketmaster drop those policies PDQ.

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    1. Re:Let me play devils advocate for a moment... by Strider- · · Score: 1

      So.. why not make tickets non-transferrable (like airline tickets) and also refundable? If you can't make it to the game/concert, return the ticket for a refund (less a nominal fee). Those returned tickets go back into the pool and can be sold again. On the day of, at least one person on the order must have appropriate ID to enter the venue.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    2. Re:Let me play devils advocate for a moment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same risk reduction for Ticketmaster could be achieved for cheaper with insurance, but Ticketmaster would have plenty of money to self-insure for cheaper still.

      As for Ticketmaster taking a cut of the higher scalping prices, that's a crime in some states. There are plenty of legal ways to overcharge people, safer to pick one of those instead.

    3. Re:Let me play devils advocate for a moment... by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      So.. why not make tickets non-transferrable (like airline tickets) and also refundable? If you can't make it to the game/concert, return the ticket for a refund (less a nominal fee). Those returned tickets go back into the pool and can be sold again. On the day of, at least one person on the order must have appropriate ID to enter the venue.

      Because the one who decides is Ticketmaster

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:Let me play devils advocate for a moment... by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Not no risk.

      There are some states with very capable scalping laws that would make it possible to go after employees of ticketmaster with knowledge of what's happening. This undercover recording is going to be quite the prize in those states and I wouldn't be surprised to see law enforcement move in and make deals with lower level employees to get the executives.

      Ticketmaster executive staff should be hiring lawyers and working out a strategy to mitigate liability or they might end up in jail.

    5. Re:Let me play devils advocate for a moment... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
      I think their legal strategy is this: "Authorized resellers" are not scalpers, but business partners. The state would only be able to go after these resellers for not collecting taxes and/or not declaring income.

      I'm fairly confident that the contract Ticketmaster has with the acts and producers allows them to sell tickets directly or through business partnerships. That sort of boilerplate would be required for cases like a small concert sponsored by your local Chamber of Commerce where you can get tickets from Ticketmaster, the venue itself or from the Chamber. Both the venue and the Chamber would technically be resellers, selling tickets that they obtained from Ticketmaster. (I assume that venues get a discount on the tickets they buy and some kind of "buy only what you've already sold" deal so they can make a profit too.

      To use an example: Imagine The Who as a band contracts with WorldWide Promotions to handle a tour. This contract almost certainly covers ticket sales, venue selection, stage equipment management, the whole enchilada. WorldWide contracts with Ticketmaster to handle ticket sales, with a subsidiary contract with the Toronto Rogers Centre/Skydome to provide the venue, declaring Ticketmaster to be the sole authorized source of tickets, with the right to subcontract ticket sales.Then Ticketmaster contracts with the venue and other resellers, where is the crime? Scalpers who have a bulk purchase account and pay the fees would just be "authorized resellers" or "authorized sales agents"

      It reminds me of how in the fine print for signing up for a marketing email usually includes things like "business partners" or "media network partners", exempting mass emails from those sources from being considered spam for legal purposes. You may have never heard of XYZ inc and regard email or sms messages from them to be spam, but technically you agreed to it when you signed up with ABC inc whether you realized it or not.

      What society considers to be a wrongful act isn't necessarily an illegal act. As a society, I think we do better in the other direction, virtually everything that is actually illegal is something that most of us can agree is wrongful.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    6. Re:Let me play devils advocate for a moment... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      A possibility of the artists getting more? You clearly don't understand entertainment industry accounting.

    7. Re:Let me play devils advocate for a moment... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      If enough big headliners with enough clout demand all of that extra revenue, you'll see Ticketmaster drop those policies PDQ.

      Good one. There are a few instances of artists challenging TM, the most visible of which was Pearl Jam. The artist always loses.

    8. Re:Let me play devils advocate for a moment... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Why would TM do *anything* other than tricks to increase their profit? They have no competition and a captive audience.

  33. Re:Ticketmaster is just responding to what you wan by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    If you don't like Ticketmaster's ways, don't buy from them.

    Since Ticket Bastard has a lock on concert tickets, that means don't go to any more concerts.

  34. Re: Ticketmaster is just responding to what you wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing that putting profits above all else is limited to the entertainment industry and for profit institutions are not delivering people's basic needs such as housing, education, health care, food, water and defense. Oh wait, you know what? You're just a dipshit. Why are you even commenting on this article then? Apparently you DO care but are just an asshole.

  35. Time to ban scalping by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Its way past time to ban scalping completly. And not just penalties for the scalpers but penalties for the sites that allow scalping to take place like Viagogo and others.

  36. Re:Ticketmaster is just responding to what you wan by AsylumWraith · · Score: 2

    AXS, Etix, Eventbrite, and especially Ticketfly. I rarely buy from Ticketmaster, (although, as mentioned above, I did recently buy tickets from them.)

  37. Lying or just forgot to read your link? by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1
    Windy says...

    Nearly all states have anti-scalping laws on the books.

    His link says...

    There is no federal law against scalping, but, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), 15 states ban the practice in some way, most labeling it as a misdemeanor with penalties including fines and/or up to a year in jail. States that restrict scalping include: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin.

    1. Re:Lying or just forgot to read your link? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      neither.
      I was under impression that it was illegal in nearly all states. I posted the link AFTER to clear up my statement.
      Therein lies the difference between you and me. You lie, troll, and AC constantly. I make mistakes, but clear them up and admit it. You OTH, continue to lie and just BS upon BS upon BS. Of course, that is what you are paid to do, in china.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  38. TicketMaster, some kinda cheezy he-man villian? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    I wonder what would happen if the Sherman Anti-trust Act was aimed at Ticketmaster. They have a virtual monopoly on their business model.

    Nothing. Because they control a large swath of the market, that doesn't make them a monopoly. You can (and many have) started their own ticket selling business. It is only when they use their market dominance to run you out of business that you have a case. Until the start doing something like blacklisting artists that use your service, you got nothing on them legally. There aren't any rules against winning the game, only cheating to win.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:TicketMaster, some kinda cheezy he-man villian? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Until the start doing something like blacklisting artists that use your service, you got nothing on them legally.

      They own or have exclusive deals with venues. Artists either use them or don't use the venues.

  39. Edit button would be nice... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    sorry. missed a word:

    that doesn't make them an illegal monopoly.

    Slashdot, grow the fuck up and add an edit button on posts like every other site on the internet.....

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  40. Here you go just bullshitting agin by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    I was under impression that it was illegal in nearly all states. I posted the link AFTER to clear up my statement.
    Therein lies the difference between you and me.

    No, the difference between you and me is I check first.

    You pretend you know things. State them as facts, (often when you have already previously been shown you are wrong). And basically just lie constantly.
    Even on the occasion you have a valid point, you still exaggerate it and manage to turn it into a lie as well.

    You lie, troll, and AC constantly.

    You claim that all the time, but have still failed on every occasion to show any. Care to try again?

    I make mistakes, but clear them up and admit it.

    You posted a link, with absolutely nothing else.
    Is that supposed to be an example of you admitting your mistake and clearing it up?
    Because it seems to normal people, that you posted a link to show you were right, but were too stupid to actually bother to read it first.

    You OTH, continue to lie and just BS upon BS upon BS. Of course, that is what you are paid to do, in china.

    Where are the lies?
    Where is the BS?
    You have never shown a lie, can you even show some BS?

    I often point out your lies and lies more lies more lies even more lies lies and lies When you aren't lying, you are just making shit up that is in no way believable, and lying.

    Only one time did you ever admit your 'mistake'. And that was after you 'mistakenly' claimed the same thing over and over going back years. Why did you never check?

  41. Windy the clueless strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who modded this up is a disgrace to the human race.
    You should know by now, never trust a Windy post.

    They won't go to jail because it is perfectly legal in the vast majority of places.
    Hardly any states have anti-scalping laws.
    It doesn't matter as it's not illegal.
    You guessed one right, but only because you are clueless and were trying to be ironic.
    There is nothing to be in on if it's perfectly legal.
    What a bunch of dumbfucks.

  42. Where do you get so many wrong impressions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was under impression

    Where do you get so many wrong impressions? Does your boss email you a talking points list every day? Or do you actively go out searching for the wrong information?

  43. Free Market Rips People Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because it can.

    News at 11.

    Well, duh. We all knew it. Free market is just "free" for those who have the money. And they are becoming less and less. Until the pitchforks and guillotines come out.

    And then, the cycle repeats.

    Sigh. If we just could set up a system in which greed (while somehow accepted, because human) doesn't take the first seat, our lives might be a tad more pleasant.

  44. Re:Ticketmaster is just responding to what you wan by sh00z · · Score: 1

    That's exactly what it's going to take--the fan community simply has to walk away from the resale marketplace. On the very morning that public tickets went on sale for Elton John's farewell tour, Ticketmaster was already offering the best seats at 75-100% markup through their reseller program (probably all purchased "legally" through the AmEx presale process). I said thanks but no thanks.

  45. Re:Ticketmaster is just responding to what you wan by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Ticketmaster isn't doing anything wrong other than responding to customer demand.

    Wouldn't it at least qualify as false advertising if they're complicit in snatching tickets for low advertised prices and enabling reselling them at much higher prices?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  46. It's Pronounced "TicketBastard" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Pronounced "TicketBastard"