Slashdot Mirror


Over 1,100 New Arcade Games Added To the Internet Archive (archive.org)

Jason Scott, writing for Internet Archive blog: The Internet Arcade, our collection of working arcade machines that run in the browser, has gotten a new upgrade in its 4th year. Advancements by both the MAME emulator team and the Emscripten conversion process allowed our team to go through many more potential arcade machines and add them to the site. The majority of these newly-available games date to the 1990s and early 2000s, as arcade machines both became significantly more complicated and graphically rich, while also suffering from the ever-present and home-based video game consoles that would come to dominate gaming to the present day. Even fervent gamers might have missed some of these arcade machines when they were in the physical world, due to lower distribution numbers and shorter times on the floor.

46 comments

  1. The Internet Archive is a treasure by bobstreo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and should be fully funded as part of the Smithsonian or Library of Congress.

    1. Re:The Internet Archive is a treasure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

    2. Re:The Internet Archive is a treasure by antdude · · Score: 2

      "It belongs to the museum!" --Indy -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  2. Why are they allowed to do this? by iampiti · · Score: 2

    The vast majority of games available will be unlicensed commercial games. In a time where many rom sites have been shut down why is archive.org exempted from this? Is it because right holders are more lenient about arcade games?

    1. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Because gamers are more interested in preserving our culture then draconian copyright laws that holds it hostage.

      Seriously, are there ANY publishers making money from selling OLD classic arcade games like Marble Madness ??? No, then the copyright should revert to the public domain instead of being hoarded away for "some day".

    2. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they secured permission?

    3. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a time where many rom sites have been shut down why is archive.org exempted from this?

      I guess that being a nonprofit helps a lot with it. Rom sites full of ads on the other hand...

    4. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The vast majority of games available will be unlicensed commercial games. In a time where many rom sites have been shut down why is archive.org exempted from this?

      Copyright law allows for registered libraries to archive and loan copyrighted material that is no longer actively for sale.
      This actively for sale rule only applies to registered libraries however.

      Combined with the first sale doctrine and sony bono act, it is legal under copyright law for archive.org to lend these materials.

      I only remember two cases in the past decade someone uploaded currently covered and for sale material, and archive.org removed it immediately in both cases.
      I'm sure there have been more than just those two, but my point is this happens so rarely that no one in the authors guild or legal system believes for a moment they are responsible for any mass copyright infringement.

    5. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Because if they don't do it now, the source material simply won't be available to preserve when the copyright finally expires.

    6. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have Rectal Ranger and FartZone.

    7. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "In a time where many rom sites have been shut down why is archive.org exempted from this?"

      I guess because libraries get a few free mandatory copies of every book published as well.

    8. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by RevDisk · · Score: 2

      Spoke with Jason at HOPE a couple weeks back. This came up tangentially. He's a nice guy, and an interesting personality.

      They had to recode big sections of MAME for functionality but so getting the code licensed correctly. Some of it is actually securing rights from copyright owners. They've been contacting hundreds of copyright holders and securing permissions. Part of it is also they get leeway as the Internet Archives is a registered library. Registered libraries get perks when it comes to lending out copyrighted material.

      It's all a LOT of legwork and they're doing a lot more than posting ROM dumps. And they're doing an insanely lot of very very deep emulation work to preserve as much as possible that is not obvious. It is very much ridiciously detailed archivist work. Which is hilarious because a lot of more academia archivists (think folks with master degrees or even PhDs in library sciences) are pissed that the Internet Archives folks call themselves archivists.

    9. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's all a LOT of legwork and they're doing a lot more than posting ROM dumps

      Not to mention, they're not technically making the ROMs available. You can play it in your browser, but you'll note there's no link to download the ROM itself - it's only available that way.

      Of course, anyone with a modicum of knowledge of how to use "Developer mode" in their browser can easily get at the real ROM files. It's not hard and left as an exercise to the reader. Presumably there are controls in place to keep users from writing scripts to mass download the ROMs.

    10. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Preserving only the (subjectively) good ones would give a false impression.

      It's not like they take up space to prevent others from being stored.

    11. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Download is on right hand side halfway down:
      https://archive.org/details/arcade_64street
      Just click "ZIP"

    12. Re:Why are they allowed to do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem I have is that I on a couple of occasions, I have seen material removed that is completely legal on multiple occasions. I've even showed EULAs and legal citations and other evidence, but apparently they can't be bothered to care or look into it, so its gone.

      At least, after years of pressure and criticism, they reversed their ridiculous rules that made both robots.txt and 410 status codes retroactive.

  3. Nintendo = assholes, that's your answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Nintendo still pretends to sell its games, but most aren't suing to shut down people keeping these old gems going.

  4. Good guy Internet Archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile Scumbag Wikimedia Foundation would delete them as "not notable".

  5. Jason Scott: World's Biggest Loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He who lives in the past, does not get laid tonight." LOL

  6. Be sure to call to pre-order! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Most importantly, do they have Battletoads?

    Why, yes, they do.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Be sure to call to pre-order! by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I bet they don't have Polybius.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    2. Re:Be sure to call to pre-order! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet even more that you checked before you posted this.

  7. My fav puzz loop by subanark · · Score: 1

    I find this entry interesting, as the more well known game Zuma basically took this idea and made a PC version with the core game mechanics, and many reviews, not knowing Puzz loop called it original.

    Note: It looks like only Puzz loop 2 is uploaded.

  8. Re:Republican RAPIST supreme court nominee by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Nope. With his previous comment, it made me read it as "steroids".

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  9. Woohoo! by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    This removes any reason I had to leave my basement. Woohoo!

    1. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a hot chick on your main floor dude. Check it out.

  10. The nonsense of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "lend" ... data ...

    Seriously... what level of drugs does one have to be on, to achieve mental contortions and delusional ignorance of that level?

    They KNOW that information is always *copied*, and the concepts of "lending" "owning" or "selling" make no sense whatsoever in the context of informationspace. Their own licenses exist precisely because of this fact. Yet publicly, they act like it’s a law of nature. Which means what we already knew: Nobody *ever* reads any of their licenses, let alone understands them.

    ["they": cokeheaded media Mafia]

  11. No Polybius, no Gyruss either by tepples · · Score: 1

    Descriptions of Polybius closely resemble the gameplay of Gyruss. It's not included in this particular collection, but you can find it elsewhere if you arrr interested.

    1. Re:No Polybius, no Gyruss either by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Gyruss had such a good soundtrack. An 8 bit cover of the Sky cover of the Bach Toccata in D.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  12. 1,100 more examples of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how video games were little more than a contrivance to separate money from stupid children, one quarter (or two) at a time.

  13. Re:And all the other rom sites get shut down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet Archive is a legally recognised library. They are exempt from copyright.

  14. Internet Archive is pretty legit by fortunatus · · Score: 1

    I hope there is a way to compensate those copyright owners who still wish to receive a royalty.. I don't know if Internet Archive has already made arrangements? Maybe one way would be to have a donate button to provide for a compensation fund? I'd click it for asteroids. I'd click it twice for omega race.

    1. Re:Internet Archive is pretty legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Archive.org is free...so should royalties in this case be a percentage of zero?

  15. Re: Are people on /. this clueless nowadays?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lighten up, buttercup

  16. Re:And all the other rom sites get shut down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not exempt from copyright, but special copyright rules apply to them.

    They are allowed to make copies of materials they own, for example, to aid the visually- or audio-impaired, but they can't just distribute copies willy-nilly.