Slashdot Mirror


Honda-Waymo Talks Are Said To Have Faltered On Tech Access (bloomberg.com)

Honda has reportedly walked away from a deal with Alphabet's Waymo to jointly develop autonomous vehicles earlier this year. Instead, Honda bought into Cruise, the self-driving car startup whose majority shareholder is General Motors. Bloomberg reports on the possible reasons why the deal fell through: For one, Waymo wasn't willing to share the substantial technology it had already developed to run autonomous vehicles, and was seeking to cut a deal that would focus on Honda providing the cars, according to two people with knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be named because the talks were private. Essentially, Waymo wanted to be the brains and have Honda be the brawn in the relationship.

One person familiar with the talks said that Waymo wanted Honda to supply electric vehicles -- an area where the automaker is just beginning to establish itself. All of Waymo's existing partnerships supply EVs or plug-in hybrids because its autonomous driving system needs more power than the puny 12-volt batteries in conventional cars. After starting talks with Honda in late 2016, Honda told Waymo it was working on an EV for the partnership that would compete with Tesla Inc.'s Model 3. But by December of last year, Waymo was concerned about progress toward that goal and Honda went shopping for battery packs to power the vehicle, the person said.

27 comments

  1. Trump will die in Russian federal prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For failing to pay Blat taxes. #Dumbest traitor ever

    1. Re: Trump will die in Russian federal prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You again?

    2. Re: Trump will die in Russian federal prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be here when he hangs. I'll be here when Republicanism isn't a craven asslicking for Vladimir Putin again. I'll be here when Trump Junior is raped for the first time in Federal prison by a train of large inmates. I'll be here.

      Where will Melania be? Spending a traitor's money like he doesn't matter and never did, it's actually Fred Trump's money anyway. Fuck those clowns, go girl!

    3. Re:Trump will die in Russian federal prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your Ritalin please.

    4. Re:Trump will die in Russian federal prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boof some cocaine like a real Conservative rapist. Then lie about that under oath, why not. #No consequences, GET RAPED SOON!

    5. Re:Trump will die in Russian federal prison by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      This is America. We do NOT put our oligarchs in jail. It's in the constitution somewhere. The exception being Bernie Madoff who made the mistake of stealing from the rich rather than from the poor.

      Trump may be in a bit of hot water with some states in a year or two once the Democrats take over the house and broadcast his financial indiscretions to the world. It'll be interesting to see if he has the money to pay the assessments for back taxes.

      But Trump is a multi-billionaire? Yep. So was Madoff until the feds netted out his assets and locked him up -- ostensibly for 120 years.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  2. It's open season on Republican women, legally now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rape time! Trump is pro-rape and Kavanaugh makes it legal! I hope Senator Collins gets hers ASAP, BACK A RAPIST AND YOU GET WHAT YOU DESERVE. Totally legal now, rape a Republican today and show them you're a CONSERVATIVE.

  3. That make sense by schweini · · Score: 2

    Decent car manufacturers are a dime a dozen right now - whereas good autonomous car tech is not. So Waymo would've been silly if they would have given access to their crown jewels just for having a decent mechanical car.

    1. Re:That make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waymo has jack shit. That’s why they don’t any anyone exposing their scam.

    2. Re:That make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mechanical car? As opposed to??

    3. Re:That make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mechanical car? As opposed to??

      A solid state car.

    4. Re:That make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Funny

    5. Re: That make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither company needs each other. Not sure why this is even news. Plenty of car companies out there for Waymo to install their technology. And Honda has technology research centers of its own. Self driving cars are decades away except for these limited use cases as in Phoenix.

    6. Re:That make sense by vtcodger · · Score: 2

      "A mechanical car? As opposed to??"

      A bio-engineered car. It's next year's fad. If you move quick, you can catch the wave. Take a naked mole rat. Tinker with a few genes. And you have cheap, autonomous, non-fossil fuel transportation. I'm told experts in the area will be hauling in paychecks in the high six digits.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  4. Tech access by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    For one, Waymo wasn't willing to share the substantial technology it had already developed to run autonomous vehicles

    This shows that the accusation against China forcing American companies to share technologies is exaggerated and made up demonized China to rally support for the American political system and military industrial complex. As seen here, all countries make the same requests. And if an American company doesn't want to share, they can walk away like Waymo. And the foreign partner can just go to another American company that is willing.

    1. Re:Tech access by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      This shows that the accusation against China forcing American companies to share technologies is exaggerated

      No. Under WTO rules, American companies should have access to do business in China WITHOUT A PARTNER. They should be able to set up their own fully owned subsidiaries, just as Chinese companies can do in America. It is not an exaggeration to say that China uses illegal trade barriers to restrict market access.

    2. Re:Tech access by Corbets · · Score: 1

      Really? Cuz... China isn’t involved in this story,

    3. Re:Tech access by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    4. Re:Tech access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about a company from a republic as if it's representative of the entire country. I suggest a little more discipline on your part, jumping to wild conclusions based on insufficient data does not make for a good argument.

    5. Re:Tech access by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      A few issues with your argument:

      * the issue with the need to partner with domestic business partner is not the same as tech access we are talking about here
      * companies have very simple way to work around the domestic partner requirements -- for example, all major Chinese internet companies were owned by foreign VCs and investors; they operate by creating wholly own business entities that own the IP, trademark etc of the company but partner with a Chinese national who own the business license. Go read about that set up.
      * under WTO, China like all other developing countries are allowed such domestic partner requirements (as well as other benefits like unbalanced tariff level); in exchange, China agreed to terms like importing trash from the West since the West doesn't like the dirty job. It is all of deal negotiation the U.S, signed up to.

    6. Re:Tech access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > China like all other developing countries

      Ah, there's the problem. China should no longer be considered "developing". They should have lost that status 10-15 years ago at the least.

      Russia, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey should be denied that status as well. Indonesia and India I'm not sure about. South Africa should be classified as "decaying".

    7. Re:Tech access by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      1) China still has 1 billion of poor people;

      2) US itself agreed to such term and without setting a timeline.

      Of course the US never abide to its own commitment anyway.

      And, China has powerful nuclear weapons too

  5. EVs only because of âoepower requirements? " by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    There isn't a technical reason a fossil fuel powered vehicle can't supply enough power to run an autonomous vehicle. Even with a "puny 12 volt battery".

    The whole statement is cringe worthy. Google only wants to put their autonomous tech into EVs to encourage people to buy more EVs.

    Call it for what it is.

  6. Re:EVs only because of âoepower requirements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Waymo's entire fleet of Chrysler Pacificas are all ICE vehicles so this is obviously bunk.

  7. Re:EVs only because of âoepower requirements? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    Exactly what sort of hardware is Waymo stuffing into their vehicles if a typical 1KWh car battery won't power it? Maybe networked Univac-1s running Excel spreadsheets? Not that there isn't room for one or two additional 12v lead-acid batteries in a typical car.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  8. Re:EVs only because of âoepower requirements? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    Batteries aren't the issue. There isn't really an issue, it's made up, but if there were it would not be the battery. There's this thing called an alternator that provides power. The battery is used for starting.