Slashdot Mirror
First SpaceX Mission With Astronauts Set For June 2019 (france24.com)
schwit1 shares a report from France 24: NASA has announced the first crewed flight by a SpaceX rocket to the International Space Station (ISS) is expected to take place in June 2019. It will be the first manned U.S. launch to the orbiting research laboratory since the space shuttle program was retired in 2011, forcing U.S. astronauts to hitch costly rides aboard Russian Soyuz spacecraft. A flight on Boeing spacecraft is set to follow in August 2019. The timetable for both launches has already been postponed several times, but NASA said Thursday it would now be providing monthly updates on deadlines. Both missions are considered tests: the two astronauts transported in each flight will spend two weeks aboard the orbiting ISS before returning to Earth. SpaceX will carry out an uncrewed test in January 2019, and Boeing in March 2019.
Launch date set for 4/20, funding for Doritos and moon pies secured.
Who ever wrote this article spelled corpses wrong.
Musk hired competent people to run Space X. Too bad he won't do that for Tesla.
The ball of fire is the habanero farts that pollute your efficiency apartment. But I agree you do know your shit, runny as it is.
Since there was alleged sabotage of a soyuz, Russia will try to sabotage Crew Dragon, Trump will allow it.
Gonna blow right the fuck up, yeah buddy, Elon gonna spark a big ass blunt from the fireball and catch a truly righteous buzz.
Boeing doesn't play fair, and they would just hate to be upstaged by an upstart, when they've gotten fat off of sucking the federal tit forever.
Expect some unexpected developments, either in the media or on some legislative subcommittee or both, to try to slow Elon down.
You mad bro?
:)
I'm so happy for you! The rest of us not so much.
They are Finally seeing there's something better than money.
[($)]
they could just bash elon and short sell tesla stock, ya know.. like everybody else does.
SpaceX engineering is scarry sloppy, but they've hit the target orbit within a tolerable margin about half the time.
You sound unhinged, comrade. Babushka getting fucked too often in your tin shed?
Yet somehow they keep delivering stuff to the ISS? That's their rocket, and their vehicle. If they are as bad as you say the NOBODY would be flying their satellites on them. I'd love to see your source.......cause I actually work in the industry, and directly support their flights to ISS.
Nobody ever has hit a target without using spacecraft GNC after. Keep on your unicorn hunt, you'll never find one.
The Dragon capsule is no where near being man-rated, so the changes of actually flying with a human is ZERO right now.
says someone commenting on an article about the timetable for crew-rating the Dragon capsule in the near future.
Here are some articles about the crew-rating of Dragon and Starliner:
https://www.nasaspaceflight.co...
https://www.nasaspaceflight.co...
Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
Pretty sure that that's not true.
Though if it were true, it's no longer true, since I just watched a SpaceX launch that put the satellite into the target orbit....
"I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
If you put the tolerances tight enough then I expect no one ever achieved target orbit on a launch.
It is normal for a GEO satellite to burn itself out of GTO from the second stage. Otherwise you would have a second stage stuck in GEO or a near-GEO orbit!
Also the Dragon capsule has its own thrusters and guidance system to make the necessary orbital adjustments to dock with ISS, so there's no problem.
Hmm, yes, at least SpaceX isn't having test-stand accidents that end with hydrazine spilled all over the place.
#naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
All he need do is build cars and meet production goals, that will fix the stock price.
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
The Dragon capsule is no where near being man-rated, so the changes of actually flying with a human is ZERO right now.
Come on... Musk has his Gnatt chart that clearly shows he can hit that deadline... Never mind there is zero slack for mistakes or schedule slippages and zero tolerance for the unknown unknowns that always popup in complex engineering projects..
Business folks do this kind of projecting all the time. They sit down, assume nothing goes wrong, takes longer than estimated, or unforeseen problems pop up on the critical path and declare the end date certain when their engineers have a list of major risks a mile long and give them a zero chance of meeting that date. But the date is what the shareholders get to hear.
I've been involved in such project planning with business folks who where obsessed with stock price and performance. One time I gave them my gut estimate on the date and they beat me up for being uncooperative, demanding I shave 6 months off the 18 that I quoted. "What if nothing goes wrong, when can you deliver?" was the question. I made the mistake of agreeing to the year based on "nothing going wrong". Of course, stuff went wrong. We finished within a week of my original estimate.
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
A deadline based on the idea that nothing goes wrong is a good strategy. Obviously, things will go wrong, and you'll slip. But if you had put in sufficient slack right from the start, people would use up the slack, and then still hit problems.
Even shorter deadlines are counterproductive, because if prospects are completely hopeless, people start giving up. You want to give the engineers just enough hope that they can do it.
PHB alert..
Oh I get that, and we tried to meet their required dates, though within a month we had already slipped almost a month. You see the problem was, it will take as long as it takes. No amount of hurrying will fix that working longer each day only helps for a week or two and nothing good happens when the team is tired. It was during that project that I started managing risks aggressively though and I started publishing the probability we could meet the various milestones based on a list of risks. Management didn't care all that much and did their usual "throw resources at the problem" thing. However, when all was said and done, I expected to get fired for missing the dates, but what happened is my manager got canned for not listening to me in the first place. Why? Because, I had documented EVERY conversation, saved EVERY E-mail, and could prove that from the agreed to conditions for my schedule where not true and that the slippages where not due to my team not being ready. My PHB would have gladly tossed me under the bus, as I had directly opposed his decision to accept an unreasonable delivery schedule, but could prove I did my level best to meet it, knowing it would fail.
I would suggest that management that doesn't listen to their engineering staff, but just imposes a schedule based on the company's financial reporting schedule is acting stupidly. In my case, the delivery date was driven by the company's fiscal year, not engineering reality. This was the height of stupidity in my view and they should have accepted my 18 month schedule. We would have not had to miss revenue targets while working OT and doing system integration in front of the customer in country. It was a death march project.
Curious, I found a book afterwards called "Death March Projects" which I suggest engineers read.
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
Yeah, anyone with "scary sloppy" engineering can land 14 story rockets with disturbing reliability, operate the current heaviest payload capacity launcher, be well on their way to regular reuse of their first stage and have a launch reliability of ~96% and increasing. All of this of course and having the lowest cost per kg of any launch company out there.
Of all the articles on Slashdot, this one really WILL attract FUD from Russian trolls. It's Russia that is losing their NASA contract for ferrying US astronauts to the space station when SpaceX (and eventually Boeing) can do it.
The Trump administration had better invent some bullshit reason for continuing to funnel money to Roscosmos or a bunch of maintenance guys who know how to cobble together an ICBM out of spare parts are going to be out of a job.