Slashdot Mirror


US Indicts Chinese Hacker-Spies In Conspiracy To Steal Aerospace Secrets (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Gizmodo: The U.S. Justice Department has charged two Chinese intelligence officers, six hackers, and two aerospace company insiders in a sweeping conspiracy to steal confidential aerospace technology from U.S. and French companies. For more than five years, two Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS) spies are said to have run a team of hackers focusing on the theft of designs for a turbofan engine used in U.S. and European commercial airliners, according to an unsealed indictment dated October 25. In a statement, the DOJ said a Chinese state-owned aerospace company was simultaneously working to develop a comparable engine.

The MSS officers involved were identified as Zha Rong, a division director in the Jiangsu Province regional department (JSSD), and Chai Meng, a JSSD section chief. At the direction of the MSS officers, the hackers allegedly infiltrated a number of U.S.-based aerospace companies, including California-based Capstone Turbine, among others in Arizona, Massachusetts, and Oregon, the DOJ said. The officers are also said to have recruited at least two Chinese employees of a French aerospace manufacturer -- insiders who allegedly aided the conspiracy by, among other acts, installing Sakula, a remote access trojan, onto company computers.

80 comments

  1. Re:FBI should investigate Khashoggi killing by Bobrick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're forgetting the FBI has zero jurisdiction over a Saudi national being murdered in Turkey. What the fuck are you smoking, bot?

  2. FBI *do* have jurisdiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    He's an American resident, and US journalist, and they do have jurisdiction over US residents. Lest you forget the 14th Amendment.
    As Trump said, "you can't prove I haven't called the FBI in". He hadn't. He just didn't want to admit he hadn't.

    Two of the people involved Jared and Trump are business partners of Prince Bone Saw. Jared was involved in getting Khashoggi barred from Saudi Arabia after he was critical of Trump in a press conference, via the same Prince Bone Saw. Trump and Jared certainly helped in the cover up afterwards. Trump's pathetic "I believe them".

    This doesn't go away you know. Even as President he cannot help a foreign power murder a journalist he doesn't like and get away with it, he cannot help with the cover up afterwards. FBI need to investigate.

    He is not above the law just because he pretends to be above the constitution.

    1. Re:FBI *do* have jurisdiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trumps FBI is doing everything necessary. But, this article is about Trumps Justice Department - not Trumps FBI, Trumps NASA or even Trumps African Development Foundation.

    2. Re:FBI *do* have jurisdiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's an American resident, and US journalist, and they do have jurisdiction over US residents. Lest you forget the 14th Amendment.

      IANAL but AFAIUI it doesn't actually say that.

      All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

      It says "born or naturalised and [also] subject to the jurisdiction are citizens", it doesn't say "born or naturalised are therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the USG courts". Maybe it's just me (and if so, explain please) but I could rather read the reverse in it: Outside the jurisdiction you're no citizen.

      Then there's that whether "state" means "any united state and any sovereign state" or just "any united state". In the latter case, no, not at all. I think the practice and attitude is more of a barbary state reservation: "we'll fuck you up when we feel like it", which has been USG foreign policy for as long as they could get away with it, though it has certainly made the US a fair amount of enemies.

      This doesn't go away you know. Even as President he cannot help a foreign power murder a journalist he doesn't like and get away with it, he cannot help with the cover up afterwards.

      Now that the guy's dead there's really no way to go "extraordinary rendition" on his arse. Too bad, eh.

  3. Re:FBI should investigate Khashoggi killing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Woah, check your islamophobia, bigot. Dismembering dissident journalists with a bone saw is part of rich Saudi culture. Stop trying to impose your judeo-christian white male values on other cultures.

  4. Which one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is this the chinese spy that worked for pelosi for two decades?

    No? Still going to keep ignoring that one? Oh alright then.

    1. Re:Which one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Site your sources or stick a sock in it, wingnut.

  5. anybody surprised? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, China will continue spying on the west. They are in a cold war with the west.

    The real problem here, is that the west has dropped our guard and continues to allow Chinese (and russian) spies in.
    It is time to stop this insanity. We need to move security clearances back to the FBI.
    Oddly, Trump is headed down the right road on this.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:anybody surprised? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "move security clearances back to the FBI"
      But the companies that make mil/gov products need to have more diversity and have to reflect the demographics of the surrounding city and state.
      Think of what barriers to advancement by the local community new security clearances put up.
      Need to be educated.
      Not on drugs with a lifestyle that always needs funds to get more drugs.
      No lifestyle with compromising information.
      No gambling problems and open to offers of money.
      No criminals.
      Not spies for other nations. Not a spy for their faith/cult.
      No split loyalty to another nation.
      Not living in a tent city, RV due to poverty.
      Someone who actually is a real US citizen.
      Not an illegal migrant with fake/created state ID documents.
      A person with dreams that another nation could make happen in return for some long term spying.
      No political history of activism ie protester who will give information to other nations for party political reasons.

      Once all that is sorted only a very few will be able to get the really great new jobs.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:anybody surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans would never spy or steal, what is this blasphemy?

    3. Re:anybody surprised? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The west was too busy spying on itself to worry too much about external threats. After all, if they helped us secure our systems they would just be breaking their own ability to hack them! Better to keep those vulnerabilities for their own use than to get them fixed.

      Improving security to prevent spying is better than trying to arrest and convict the spies. Aside from anything else, there will likely be retaliation against US citizens in China who are accused of spying, and further restrictions on US companies trying to do business there in the name of "national security". Just quietly finding the spies and sabotaging them, e.g. with fake data, is much more effective and less costly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re: anybody surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Russia ... Trump ... right road...

      I was going to insert a joke about somebody being pissed about all this, but sometimes there are too many angles.

    5. Re:anybody surprised? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Funny, the Washington Post reported that ~5 million Americans hold security clearances. Were you unable to cut it?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    6. Re:anybody surprised? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      With trade imbalanced so heavily, China needs us much more than we need them. They won't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    7. Re: anybody surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA is kinda a deadbeat nation in a sense. It owes China trillions in goods supplied and they know they will never be able to spend it all before it gets inflated away.

      If i I was them I'd probably try to take anything not nailed down to the floor research wise roo. :)

    8. Re:anybody surprised? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Careful, they said that about the UK and the EU too, and look how that is working out.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:anybody surprised? by Gryle · · Score: 1

      That's about 1.5% of the total US population. What point are you trying to make here?

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    10. Re:anybody surprised? by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      With trade imbalanced so heavily, China needs us much more than we need them.

      What? How does that work? China has all the manufacturing, a billion consumers, and a huge cash surplus. What do they need the USA for?

    11. Re:anybody surprised? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      The percentage of the population is irrelevant. 5 million people is far from "a very few" that the GP stated.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    12. Re:anybody surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and fwiw, it's about 3.87% of the actual working adult population (129M as of Sept. '18). Not that it matters.

    13. Re:anybody surprised? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Why do they need us? Ask yourself why do they need the $505B we sent to them in 2017. You think they don't care if the US funds were to dry up?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    14. Re:anybody surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no, China does not have all the manufacturing. Manufacturing jobs have been on a steady climb in the US since the end of the recession.

    15. Re:anybody surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know they can print their own money just like you did to pay for it dont you?

      They are becoming rich enough to buy it for themselves anyway now. Or sell to Europe etc etc

  6. Losing team. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting how the Chinese have so little confidence in their own capabilities they have to "borrow" it from other countries to the tune of years.

    1. Re:Losing team. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this particular case China could have just bought the technology legally since the technology was for civilian grade aircraft engines. China should dial back their spying efforts in the US because they caught every couple of months doing this type of shit. Every time they get caught it reinforces the idea that China is technically incompetent (which they aren't) and needs to steal technology since they are not capable of building their own.

    2. Re:Losing team. by Bobrick · · Score: 1

      You're assuming your perception of China is in any way relevant to China. That's pretty absurd.

    3. Re: Losing team. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're not that informed but "face" (an excellent synonym for "perception") is managed very carefully in China, particularly when the outside world is involved.

    4. Re: Losing team. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shaddap anti-science republican faggot.

    5. Re: Losing team. by Bobrick · · Score: 1

      That obviously isn't stopping them from engaging in constant, blatant IP theft, state-sponsored industrial espionage and sabotage, not to mention an horrific human rights record. Right in the "face" of the entire world, face it.

    6. Re:Losing team. by cavreader · · Score: 1

      It is very relevant to China. Every time they get caught it provides the ammunition the government needs to ban Chinese products entering the US market. It can also lead to sanctions and prohibitions on other technologies that contain Chinese components in the products supply chain. Just ask Kaspersky Labs what happens when the US government decides to declare a company is a national security risk just because they are closely associated with a government hostile to the US.

  7. Re:FBI should investigate Khashoggi killing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting the FBI has zero jurisdiction over a Saudi national being murdered in Turkey.

    If you're speaking as a matter of law then no. However, the United States is a powerful nation with the ability to inflict great economic harms upon those nations which displease her. In fact the economic power of the United States is so overwhelming that her vast military powers rarely need to be demonstrated. Like the French Marshals of Napoleon or the Roman Legates of centuries past, merely displaying the baton is enough to command obedience and respect. On top of that, just about every nation on this planet, including Turkey, receives trading privileges with access to the US markets along with rather generous allowances of foreign aid, cheap loans, military and diplomatic assistance. In that regard the United States can also be a powerful and useful friend. Most nations have decided that it's better to be our friend or at least not openly our enemy and when you think about the geopolitical situation along those lines I think you will agree that the opinion of the United States in these matters caries great influence, both with the Turks and the Saudis. Either one or both them will almost certainly be willing to make substantial concessions when they are asked for by the American President, especially when done in ways that save face because after all, nobody likes public humiliation. I believe that the situation will be resolved in due course in a way that maintains the status quo and allows both sides a face saving climb down from these fruitless and ultimately pointless escalations. A couple of years from now, few outside the diplomatic community will even remember what happened.

  8. Escalation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When hacker or spy just doesn't grab the attention of the public anymore, hacker-spy!

  9. Re: Everyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ruining the world? What about the microprocessor, flight, the internet that you are currently using, the light bulb, GPS, nuclear power, etc.

  10. There's not investigating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wake me up when they subpoena Jared's WhatsApp Saudi communications. Or Trumps business records connecting him to Prince Bone Saw. Or the 15 days of too-ing and fro-ing that resulted in the "died in fist fight" bullshit and Trumps "I believe them" unsustainable bullshit.

    This needs a special prosecutor.

    They should have enforced the emoluments clause from the start, should have prevented the non-governmental back channels via Jared. If the story of Jared's Saudi visit is true, then that's a major crime and should be investigated. It's not enough to block Jared from having security clearance, if he's already abused the temporary security clearance he had.

    And then there's the $1.6 million dollar payoff for the abortion by Broidy. A well known middle east funding conduit. Man that is suspicious as f**k. Paid via Cohen, Trump's lawyer, with Keith M. Davidson involvement in all three (as fake lawyer to the two known Trump payoffs), same monikers, same timing, everything. That whole Broidy thing needs a special prosecutor too.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/13/us/politics/elliott-broidy-michael-cohen-payout.html

    "During the wide-ranging October meeting, Mr. Broidy raised numerous topics high on the agenda of the United Arab Emirates, a country that has given his security company a contract worth hundreds of millions of dollars. He pitched the president on a paramilitary force his company was developing for the U.A.E. and urged Mr. Trump to fire Rex W. Tillerson, then the secretary of state, who the U.A.E. believed was insufficiently tough on its rival Qatar."

    "The documents show that Mr. Broidy has worked closely with George Nader, an adviser to the U.A.E. and a witness in the special counsel’s investigation, to help steer Trump administration policy on numerous issues in the Middle East. Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, is examining Mr. Nader’s possible role in funneling Emirati money to finance Mr. Trump’s political efforts. There is no indication that Mr. Mueller’s team is looking into Mr. Broidy."

    "In 2009, Mr. Broidy pleaded guilty to charges that he made nearly $1 million worth of illegal gifts to New York State officials in order to win an investment of $250 million from the state’s public pension fund. Among the gifts were trips to Israel and Italy, payouts to officials’ relatives and girlfriends and an investment in one relative’s production of a low-budget movie called “Chooch.”"

    1. Re:There's not investigating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wake me up when they subpoena Jared's WhatsApp Saudi communications" - It's all in hand. There is a 9 day waiting period in effect, by law. Wait.

  11. I say chinese criminals deserve chinese punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Off with the head and feed it to the peasants making apple bling.

  12. THANKS IVAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know your entire comment history is available for people to see, right Ivan?

  13. No Wei by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Hao

  14. Re:You are right! Americans should NOT be surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one's saying China's actions are unreasonable from their perspective. But only because it makes sense for them to do it, doesn't mean that the US should allow it. If the US is in a position to do so it should most certainly thwart Chinese attempts to steal secrets.

  15. Internal Affairs by mentil · · Score: 1

    At these kind of companies, I'm surprised they don't contract to a company that hires Chinese and other nationalities to approach their client's employees and try to turn them into agents. Better that you find out who on your team's corruptible, than the competition finding out first.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Internal Affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not worth the risk. Wouldn't at all surprise me if they killed themselves rather then return to China. Quite frankly if they do it or are tossed from a plane at 20 thousand feet wearing a parachute made in China, I wouldn't care any more. Ten down, how many more thousands remain.

    2. Re:Internal Affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can already hear the screeching journalists accusing them of racial profiling and racism.

      Probably better for your company to be cleaned out by spies than ruined by an outrage mob.

    3. Re:Internal Affairs by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Companies like Amazon, Walmart, GM, Pioneer Seeds(du pont) and so on use 3rd party companies that hire or transfer a new person where thefts/IP-theft are happening, and the plant picks away until they're part of the ring itself. Then come either litigation and/or firings and/or both. You just don't hear about it much, outside of the "so-and-so worker/manager/upper-manager/production assistant/etc was escorted out of the building" with no reasons given and even the gossip queens have no idea why.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  16. Re:You are right! Americans should NOT be surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only the Europeans that the Americans stole from had been a bit more enlightened, we wouldn't have to put up with the America they turned into.

  17. must not have worked by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Well, apparently it didn't work because their rocket just blew up last week.

  18. I AM Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China actually services nearrly all its planes and can certainly deconstruct any commercial engine - so they can steal it fair and square in their own maintenance hangers. It is more likely they are stealing actual test results Vs claimed specifications. That way they can make better aftermarket parts, and not buy originals. More likely they were after how long it takes for the engine to fail under full military power.

    Besides China already has a few drone and helicopter engines from Iraq - so they know what they have to acheive on 100% locally produced engines by 2025.

    1. Re: I AM Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not understand manufacturing. China remains far behind on quality, precision, etc. Building rocket engines, turbine engines, etc requires extreme tolerances, otherwise the fans blow apart. So not surprising.

    2. Re: I AM Surprised by zilym · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't write them off so flippantly. China has been making huge strides on quality, precision, etc. I remember buying Made in China stuff when I was a kid and being subsequently hugely disappointed in the results pretty much every time. Nowadays, things I buy from China on eBay very often exceed my expectations.

      In a way, I'm kind of rooting for the Chinese to grab all the trade secrets they can so that they can produce higher quality stuff at amazingly low prices. The USA is so broken with backhanded gov't regulations, insane corporate management, bizarre public education, and other societal ills, etc that we may never be able to drive the prices down like they can.

      Of course, the danger is that they will grab all those secrets and then close the door on trading with us, preventing us from benefitting from their economic efficiencies while they enjoy all the improvements our trade secrets provided.

    3. Re: I AM Surprised by The+Snazster · · Score: 1

      Making a modern jet engine requires a body of knowledge that takes decades to build up. The organizations that make them have pretty much all been working on them since the middle of the last century.

      Being able to make rocket engines has little or nothing to do with it, by the way.

      The age of computer hacking has made it possible for China is attempt to jump the line and steal what they don't want to spend the time and money on to develop for themselves. Then, of course, they will do their level best to undercut and put out of business the very companies they stole it from.

    4. Re: I AM Surprised by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I remember buying Made in China stuff when I was a kid and being subsequently hugely disappointed in the results pretty much every time. Nowadays, things I buy from China on eBay very often exceed my expectations.

      In the 60's "Made in Japan" was a certificate of junkiness. That turned around in the 70's, and by the 80's Japan was starting to eat Detroit. In the 90's we were so like "Turning Japanese I think I'm turning Japanese at least I think so".

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  19. Funny how the names of NSA employees never leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it... one of the key missions of the NSA was and is industrial espionage, and as they say "to retrieve technology of interest", but we never find out any names of the people who do it... but China and Russia, it's like they just post a large bulletin on the internet declaring their names, employments, roles, and procedures for everyone to see.

    What's happening here is the U.S. tries to create discord with other countries by making up false accusations and indicting important people high up, hoping to create fallout within foreign governments or large corporations and industry when these people find out that suddenly they will be arrested basically for working for their own country and government.

    Anyone involved in industry espionage like this would sit behind a computer screen with no information about them accessible at all.

  20. It wuz haxx0rz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese, Russian, who cares? It's idiot bureaucrats, derping like the best of the "cybar h4xx0r" derps.

  21. Perspective by johnsie · · Score: 1

    US companies like Google, Facebook etc are constantly mining data and spying on people. But if the Chinese move a muscle then BOOM! Massive outcry.

    1. Re:Perspective by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Google and Facebook are out to make money. The Chinese are out to be a superpower. I like my chances better with the US than with China.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  22. New meaning by Wizardess · · Score: 1

    Gives a new meaning to the old slur, "Chinese copy," doesn't it.
    {^_-}

  23. Re: You are right! Americans should NOT be surpris by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    This is a game of chess. "Stealing" is a move we wish to prevent "the other guy" from making. How it makes you feel... (one way or the other) probably isn't relevant.

  24. Re: You are right! Americans should NOT be surpri by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    ....ain't nationalism just grand, though?! ;)

  25. Re:FBI should investigate Khashoggi killing by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    First of all, your original post is spoken like someone planting fake issues against the US. Maybe you're a Chinese government troll working to divert attention from the main issue presented.

    Next, the issue you raise isn't an American issue at all with the minor exception of the fact that Khashoggi worked for the Washington Post. Sure the Saudis are scum for doing this, and you're blaming Trump for that? As if the previous administration wasn't in bed with them too? Get a grip.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  26. Oh Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russians must stay silent ? Why exactly.

    Remember - talking is better than shooting if your archers use Plutonium arrows.

    1. Re:Oh Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laughable threat - your shitty Chinese missile couldnt hit the continental US even if you launched it from Kansas!

    2. Re:Oh Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, it could, if launched in KS....they fly so badly that it'd fall over on the launch pad and irradiate miles of strip-malled former prairie.

  27. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    P&W, GE, Rolls-Royce and other brand turbines disintegrate all the time. There is no such thing as perfect technology.

  28. Re: Saudi did us all a favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy was not a journalist. He was an opinion writer, a very high level member of the Muslim Brotherhood and a top level Turkish intelligence official/asset. He was a scumbag and we are all better off with him dead. Three cheers for the Saudis doing the right thing and ending this piece of shit.

    Why else do you think the British knew this was coming 3 weeks in advance and let it happen?

  29. Re: Funny how the names of NSA employees never lea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow thank you, Armchair Cold Warrior Spy Guy, for sharing your in depth real world experience as an international spy! I feel so much smarter after reading your well founded post!

    Which video game or Hollywood movie taught you all that? I want to be as smart as you!

  30. Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they don't need any process specifications for the creation of turbine metals and other materials.

  31. Re:FBI should investigate Khashoggi killing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if the previous administration wasn't in bed with them too? Get a grip.

    However, the similar situation was not occurred during the previous administration, so you don't know how they would react to the situation. Though, in your tone, you implied that the administration would react the same as this one.

  32. Re:FBI should investigate Khashoggi killing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, we will be asking Israel to return Palestinian land when?

  33. But But..m'Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the Russians CNN told me so.

  34. Remember the British jet engines... by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    The Chinese don't really need to grab anything, they own many Airbus and Boeing planes with those engines.

    Back in the 1960's they bought a few British passenger planes and made literally Chinese copies of the engines just fine.

  35. Re: Everyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the exception of perhaps the light bulb, it could be argued that all of those things you listed are ruining the world. Microprocessors and Internet are used to invade people's privacy, flight presumably contributes to global warming, GPS is used for military purposes, nuclear power generates pools of radioactive waste fuel rods that have no safe disposal procedures, etc...

  36. Do you know why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the USA totally lacks skilled engineers and therefore has to poach them from abroad or from foreign student programs.

  37. Send all Chinese students home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send all Chinese students home.
    Make all Chinese owned companies give up 51% of their control to Americans.
    Make China choose to either trade with the USA and allow territories within it to choose their own political systems (Tibet, HongKong, Macau, Taiwan)
    or
    keep their grip, disallow freedom of speech, travel, assembly and not trade with the USA. It is clear that cutting off Qualcom, Microsoft, Cisco, would destroy their ability to compete throughout the rest of the world for many years.

    Being nice to China hasn't been good for the world.

    1. Re: Send all Chinese students home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being denied microsoft would be a favor.

  38. Every Chinese immigrant is a potential spy by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    How it works:

    When you want to come to the west the Chinese Government will remind you that you still have family in China. If your working somewhere where they might want some information they simply will ask you to get it.

    Simple.