Slashdot Mirror


In China, Your Car Could Be Talking To the Government (apnews.com)

schwit1 shares a report: More than 200 manufacturers, including Tesla, Volkswagen, BMW, Daimler, Ford, General Motors, Nissan, Mitsubishi and U.S.-listed electric vehicle start-up NIO, transmit position information and dozens of other data points to government-backed monitoring centers, The Associated Press has found. Generally, it happens without car owners' knowledge. The automakers say they are merely complying with local laws, which apply only to alternative energy vehicles. Chinese officials say the data is used for analytics to improve public safety, facilitate industrial development and infrastructure planning, and to prevent fraud in subsidy programs.

But other countries that are major markets for electronic vehicles -- the United States, Japan, across Europe -- do not collect this kind of real-time data. And critics say the information collected in China is beyond what is needed to meet the country's stated goals. It could be used not only to undermine foreign carmakers' competitive position, but also for surveillance -- particularly in China, where there are few protections on personal privacy. Under the leadership of Xi Jinping, China has unleashed a war on dissent, marshalling big data and artificial intelligence to create a more perfect kind of policing, capable of predicting and eliminating perceived threats to the stability of the ruling Communist Party.

73 comments

  1. BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think Tesla isn't collecting every aspect of your driving?

    What happens when the government comes with a warrant? Is Tesla going to suddenly become an "activist" and fight the request on behalf of the user, for free? No, they'll turn that data right over, POST HASTE.

    1. Re: BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just tesla, all these companies.....too. All has to be said is us is NSL.

      Getting tired of seeing these articles spout gov, and reference as if Chinese only have to worry about BigBroXi (they do, and that's bad/worse), but as if we are living in some beacon of privacy fiefdom over here in West. Take one looks at goog, msft, and every major tech corp vendor spycraft and tell me they have your interests in mind, and nothing to worry about here.

      We just haven't reached there yet in West....

    2. Re: BULLSHIT! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      We just haven't reached there yet in West....

      Nice deflection there, my dude.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re: BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A delfection from what, i dont live in China, so i don't give a fuck about China. I care about the west, my home.

    4. Re: BULLSHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't think this is not in the works in the West. It is. Some governments are already heading in this direction and some are there. China is likely the worst with countries like the UK and Australia not far behind. Governments the world over are taking a keen interest in cashless societies being a thing. They all hate crypto and in some countries like England and Australia, failing to "unlock" content will result in a swift and radical change of address for the person refusing. American and other corporations ALWAYS cooperate with governments, even when they say they have end users' best interest in mind. They don't. They will all throw you under the bus at a moment's notice.

      Using things like Apple Pay, Google Pay, We Chat Pay, AliPay, mPesa, and others are the thin edge of the wedge of control. Yes, they are convenient, but at what cost? What if I want to legally buy a firearm or knife and I don't want anyone knowing? Here in Texas, face-to-face sales of firearms are legal. Cash only, no paperwork. Cannot do that if cash does not exist. Sure, you could barter for goods or services, but then the transaction is not once and done, which is the preference.

    5. Re:BULLSHIT! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Tesla HAS to collect extensive data on your driving, to use in defense in court when they inevitably get sued for their "self driving" car failing, when it was really your bad driving that caused the accident.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re: BULLSHIT! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? The TPS security hole is damn easy for the police to exploit, so easy that I'm downright sure most police departments are. It certainly explains my last few speeding tickets.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re: BULLSHIT! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding me? The TPS security hole is damn easy for the police to exploit, so easy that I'm downright sure most police departments are. It certainly explains my last few speeding tickets.

      Y'all don't know what deflection is? It's like a story about China that suddenly becomes about 'Murrica. It's about Cohen pleading guilty to misleading congress, and Trump saying "Her emails!"

      And notice that I did a purposeful example of deflection as well.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:BULLSHIT! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You think Tesla isn't collecting every aspect of your driving?

      Tesla is not the government.

      What happens when the government comes with a warrant?

      Look bozo, we're not concerned about it because we're worried that the mean cops will arrest you for knocking off a liquor store. People who are concerned about this are interested in civic liberties not some kind of moronic anarchism.

      When the government has to get a warrant, that is known to be different than if they don't have to have one. It is as simple as that.

  2. Re: Me Chinese me play joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese pee in our fentenyl, the Colombians pee in our coke

  3. FTFY by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It WILL be used not only to undermine foreign carmakers' competitive position, but also for surveillance

    Fixed that for you.

    1. Re:FTFY by bobstreo · · Score: 2

      It WILL be used not only to undermine foreign carmakers' competitive position, but also for surveillance

      Fixed that for you.

      You forgot to add that your social media score will be "adjusted" if you speed, block traffic, make illegal turns, or drive to "certain areas" the government doesn't approve of.

      I am pretty sure the could/will should be changed to "is".

    2. Re:FTFY by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The MO of the CCP is to protect the CCP first and foremost. All others are expendable in that endeavor.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  4. Re: Me Chinese me play joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government Motors Corporation would never use the OnSpy service for such things. Real news says so and we can trust real news.

    Heil Hitlary as mandated by the law!

  5. ok by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Every day, Slashdot admins shocked to discover that China is a dictatorship.

    A real one, not an "OMG, my political opponents won something so oh noes" one.

    1. Re: ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, slashdot has gone done the shitter last 8 years or more. Not even sure why I still come here and read this millenial buzzfeed titled bullshit. Or their facade shock articles as if west has some beacon of authority over privacy care. One just needs to look at onstar, car kill switches, alexa in car, and.... No need to say much more.

      Alexa in car. Alexa in house. People have gone mad. Sure it's not communicating with gov, sure... Agencies only own their own azmn dedicated cloud contract

    2. Re:ok by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Slashdot admins? Really? They are shocked?

      They don't just aggregate stories that are news for nerds, stuff that matters?

      Where are these posts you speak about where admins express their shock?

      Posted by a very shocked msmash on Friday November 30, 2018 @09:10AM from the meanwhile-in-China dept

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  6. Other places, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could? Is.

    Australia is not too far behind. Government want all manner of access to about everything. Random breath tests (breath and cannabis/meth) everywhere, data retention everywhere. Some states are worse than others. Probably the state with the least amount of aggro is Queensland. NSW, VIC, and WA are fairly strict. Gun ownership, for example, in QLD is fairly easy. The cops aren't quite as aggressive unless you are into drama or get caught drink driving. Gun owners in NSW have to jump through far too many hoops.

  7. In USA... by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 2

    In USA, Your Card IS Talking To the Government: https://www.forbes.com/sites/t...

    1. Re:In USA... by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 1

      Of course, s/card/car/

    2. Re:In USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you can see the extreme difference in degree between requiring a warrant to track a single vehicle, and tracking all vehicles in realtime, all of the time?

    3. Re:In USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I believe there are some warrant exceptions, where cooperation is forthcoming naturally, RE amber alerts.

    4. Re:In USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that you only need a warrant if you want to bring the tracking as evidence in a trial. They can track you at any time for any reason so long as they keep it on the down low.

    5. Re:In USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the NSA

    6. Re:In USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA got that message; it's in 50 USC and was when the program was authorized. If you would read instead of repeat propaganda, you'd see that all extractions of NSA collected data on US persons requires a warrant, and that it's audited and that violations are audited and prosecuted.

    7. Re:In USA... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      In USA, Your Card IS Talking To the Government: https://www.forbes.com/sites/t...

      It says over and over in that article that they weren't spying, they had to get a warrant. In one case, it was a rental car. Remember, when you rent a car, it isn't your car.

    8. Re:In USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the government talks to your car.

    9. Re:In USA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like those singing greeting cards? That's okay--government employees probably get a kick out of having a chihuahua with a party hat and googly eyes sing "Happy Birthday" to them.

  8. In reality by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In reality, if your vehicle can be reporting on you, the only safe assumption is that it is doing so. It doesn't matter what country you live in, except that some countries may be more likely to abuse the information. Your automaker's EULA certainly gives them the right to sell that data to anyone they like. It might require a token attempt at anonymization, but we all know that can be reversed if you have enough data.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re: In reality by houghi · · Score: 1

      That EULA would not ve valid under GDPR.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re: In reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on who is doing the car making:

      BMW, Mercedes, or VW? No GDPR worries.
      GM or Ford? The GDPR would be used.

      The GDPR was made to be a lever for trade disputes. It wasn't crafted to actually keep European companies in line.

    3. Re: In reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the propaganda Ivan, but you're wrong.

  9. Uhm... by beep54 · · Score: 0

    The title of this bit is, er, a bit too long. Should say, "Your car is talking to the government." Full stop.

  10. My car is a 1998 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it wants to report to big brother, it will need a phone line.

  11. No, he got it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called messing with the competition. And yes, the cocaine-producing companies probably do adulterate fentenyl.

    The only thing wrong with the original post was calling it a joke. The illicit drug market is big business, they don't joke around. When producers and distributors urinate in each other's products, it's for business reasons, not for lulz.

  12. They are already there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we still wait for the GM Snitch model, I guess it's factory was closed as well.

  13. In Soviet Russia car spy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... on oh wait nevermind, this is the 21st century. In Soviet-esque Planet Earth, car spy on YOU!

  14. We do by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "...United States, Japan, across Europe -- do not collect this kind of real-time data."

    It's kinda cute that you believe that.
    signed: The NSA

    1. Re:We do by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Drove around the UK a few months ago, rental car had a feature where it displayed the speed limit at all times. It wasn't always right, but it did have this really creepy feature where it knew where the speed limit dropped around obviously-temporary roadwork. No way that was programmed into the nav system.

    2. Re:We do by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Nobody has access to whatever the NSA collects except the military, and they don't do law enforcement.

      Nobody knows what the NSA records, that includes you and me.

      Kinda "cute" that you believe you have knowledge of secret activities beyond merely that secret activities might be happening.

      And it is unlikely they collect that shit from cars in the US, it doesn't have any military value. If a war breaks out, they can simply start collecting it. You really do not appreciate the information glut that they likely have. It is useful to track vehicles in countries where the US could use special forces to apprehend an enemy of the State, or places where you can drop a missile on their head. You can't do any of that in the US, and NSA doesn't do law enforcement. They're military.

    3. Re: We do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like somebody that has no idea how long "temporary" roadworks in the UK last for.

  15. Something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something something Soviet Russia!

  16. To be fair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... In any other place where the intelligence agencies have enough resources, your car could well be doing the same.

  17. Poohbear Spies Everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if your car doesnt talk your neighbors, the gas attendant, the toll booth operator, and your own personal watcher all report to their superiors.

    TRADE WILL LIBERALIZE CHINA!

    Remember the lies they told us. Remember who your politicians served.

  18. Re: Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fentanyl is a wholely owned Chinese/CIA operation. Stop being a fucking pleb.

  19. In the UK... by paulhar · · Score: 4, Informative

    > But other countries that are major markets for electronic vehicles -- the United States, Japan, across Europe -- do not collect this kind of real-time data.

    Sure they do.

    ANPR. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Cell site locality/triangulation from the built-in-car phone.

    And before anyone says 'real-time', with my aluminium foil hat correctly fitted, Snowdon showed that things are collected...

    1. Re:In the UK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since 2018 all new cars in the EU had to have an accident recorder on board, including a cellular data link and GPS receiver. I'm not sure how this is implemented, but the idea is that the car call back to the manufacturer in case of airbags deployed and also emergency services. The catch here is that the company developing it is under US ownership, so it is a simple matter for the NSA to forward a national security letter to any US citizen employed by that company to get your position and possibly audio. So things are exactly as bad in Europe. No need to point fingers of the Chinese.

    2. Re:In the UK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA is a Control Police Dictatorship State, the same as China, it's just distributed so you don't notice it.

      search youtube: Larken Rose Voting

  20. As discussed elsewhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you own a GM, Mercedes, BMW, Honda, Toyota, Ford, or a few others, there is a very real chance your car is phoning home to the government as well.

    The only thing separating China from the US is public perception and citizen apathy. And at the rate America is going that won't separate it for long.

    1. Re:As discussed elsewhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can make cracks about our Commander in Chief all day long anywhere in the world. If one were to make cracks about Chinese leadership on their soil, that person would disappear, and there would be some fresh organs for sale on the transplant market.

    2. Re:As discussed elsewhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True.

      But I very much doubt that is because of the difference in the leaders wishes.
      I think it has more to do with what kind of orders the rest of the staff is willing to follow.

      The recent Saudi incident seems to indicate that Trump doesn't really mind getting rid of people he finds impractical.

  21. Monkey see, monkey do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they keep up the good work, they may even be admitted into the world's biggest surveillance club, the five eyes.

  22. My car is silent by PPH · · Score: 2

    On the other hand, my insurance company OBD dongle and my RFID toll pass can't keep their yaps shut.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:My car is silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you a dumbfuck and not wrapping your RFID in foil.
      And a dumbfuck permitting insurance to track you.
      And a dumbfuck for buying vehicles with trackers in them.

  23. Taxing taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do not collect this kind of real-time data.

    How else could you implement comprehensive taxation system for the road users for maintenance and pollution control purposes? I'm sure many countries have already "balled around" the concept, mine included. Every car is included in such a system, not just the electric or gas ones.

  24. Not sure which is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having the gov collect data directly(China), or having corps collect it(USA), sell your soul for 5 bucks for adverts, and if the gov gets a warrant, give it to the gov for a fee. Maybe the companies in China sell your data too. In the end what matters is how the gov handles the data. If your car is stolen, you want the police to use the car's GPS tracking. If you are out buying drugs, then you'd rather they not. And I think we can all agree if you are at a peaceful protest, we'd prefer the gov and adverts not know. Take a cab and pay cash to it and leave the phone at home.

  25. Does Mazda talk? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I wonder if my car talks to the Mazda dealer. I drove past the dealership going to another place, and when I got back home there was an email saying my car could be overdue for service. This isn't the first time. Am I paranoid?

  26. Has WindBourne taught us nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only bad if China does it !!

    1. Re:Has WindBourne taught us nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only bad if China does it !!

      OK, now google: "What happened to the Falun Gong? Where are they now?"

    2. Re:Has WindBourne taught us nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean Bing. And it finds nothing??

  27. big net catches lots of other fishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My father was an insurance adjuster. He went all over the place.
    He frequently had free time between meetings and used it to learn more about the cities he was in.
    He also frequently looked for short cuts to the places he needed to go. This involved going through some bad neighborhoods.
    This kind of tracking, looking for who was in that area at odd times, would pick him up.
    Google maps has made more people take strange routes to places.
    This it ripe for abuse.
    Why were you hanging out with hookers and drug dealers?

    1. Re:big net catches lots of other fishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a thing. During riots around the world, police frequently speak to people whose phone was present in the area during the trouble times. Happens all the time. You would have to have a decent alibi, like a restaurant reservation or something. Plenty of people were arrested and questioned during OWS and in California.

      It kind of begs the question about pay apps and the data being sold to insurance companies. FB wants to sell data to everyone. "Sir, your rates are going up because we see you order triple-meat pizzas three times a week."

  28. OnStar + AI = always listening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the government can turn on your OnStar to listen to your conversations when it wants to.
    Add in AI to interpret your conversations and you can have the government listening to ALL in car conversations ALL the time.
    Where is your right to privacy?
    People who are willing to give up their freedom for security will lose both and deserve neither.

  29. The future is now by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And the future...is going to be some kind of warped Black Mirror episode with Bryce Dallas Howard, where the government watches all you do, then shuts off your access to loans and whatnot if you don't kowtow and your communist social score drops too low.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:The future is now by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Like Nazi Germany doing a trial run of blitzkrieg on Guernica, China is doing a trial run for this in Venezuela for the dictatorship there.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:The future is now by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Guernica was a bombing raid, not a land attack you ninny. And it only happened because their target was obscured by smoke and they couldn't see it.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:The future is now by mrwireless · · Score: 1

      Social Cooling is a word we can use to describe these large scale chilling effects: https://www.socialcooling.com

    4. Re:The future is now by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 1

      Well, welcome to 1984, by George Orwell.

  30. What do you mean, "in China"? It's EVERYWHERE! by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    If you have a vehicle that has wireless connectivity, it is 100% certain that it's 'phoning home' to either the manufacturer or the government. Guaranteed. Even if, somehow, your car isn't, your gods-be-damned smartphone is reporting your position anyway. Hell, between the two, when you're driving, it's likely providing differential GPS to whoever is collecting the data on you, thus improving the accuracy practically down to mere centimeters.

    Does this bother you? It should.
    o Locate, disconnect, and dummy-load the wireless connectivity in your car
    o Get rid of your smartphone, get a nice cheap dumbphone, and turn it off when you're not using it actively
    Now you have some privacy at least.
    "But Rick, I'm addicted to my smartphone! How will I check Facebook and Twitter every 5 minutes, or play Candy Crush, or watch movies? I have to be entertained every waking moment or I'll lose my mind!"
    Please, humans, grow up already. Or at least read a book when you're bored.
    "But Rick, how can I read an e-book without a smartphone or e-book reader?
    A paper book, damnit..

  31. Taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least a couple states are looking at requiring cars to have GPS reporting so they can tax you on miles driven to recoup lost "revenue" from lower gas sales.

  32. As Opposed To? by ememisya · · Score: 1

    In America the government talks to your car.

  33. Orwell not only had a tardis, must've been Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scary stuff.