Slashdot Mirror


House Panel Issues Scathing Report On 'Entirely Preventable' Equifax Data Breach (thehill.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Hill: The Equifax data breach, one of the largest in U.S. history, was "entirely preventable," according to a new House committee investigation. The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, following a 14-month probe, released a scathing report Monday saying the consumer credit reporting agency aggressively collected data on millions of consumers and businesses while failing to take key steps to secure such information. "In 2005, former Equifax Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Richard Smith embarked on an aggressive growth strategy, leading to the acquisition of multiple companies, information technology (IT) systems, and data," according to the 96-page report authored by Republicans. "Equifax, however, failed to implement an adequate security program to protect this sensitive data. As a result, Equifax allowed one of the largest data breaches in U.S. history. Such a breach was entirely preventable."

The report blames the breach on a series of failures on the part of the company, including a culture of complacency, the lack of a clear IT management operations structure, outdated technology systems and a lack of preparedness to support affected consumers. "A culture of cybersecurity complacency at Equifax led to the successful exfiltration of the personal information of approximately 148 million individuals," the committee staff wrote. "Equifax's failure to patch a known critical vulnerability left its systems at risk for 145 days. The company's failure to implement basic security protocols, including file integrity monitoring and network segmentation, allowed the attackers to access and remove large amounts of data." The Oversight staff found that the company not only lacked a clear management structure within its IT operations, which hindered it from addressing security matters in a timely manner, but it also was unprepared to identify and notify consumers affected by the breach. The report said the company could have detected the activity but did not have "file integrity monitoring enabled" on this system, known as ACIS, at the time of the attack.

75 comments

  1. Oh wow by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A scathing report? That will show them!

    1. Re:Oh wow by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Is that harsher than a firmly written letter? How does it compare to being brutally frank?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Oh wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for the scathing report on the FCC open-comment NN covered-up-Russian-bot-attack that just "happened" to be pushing Ajit Pai's position... I'm hoping there's scalding involved too, maybe some feathers. Fingers crossed.

    3. Re: Oh wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah!

    4. Re:Oh wow by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

      It is a very firm and clear message being sent, that they must answer to: all calls from Congressional re-election PACs asking for donations.

    5. Re:Oh wow by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
      And it's missing the big picture.

      The bigger problem is that Equifax themselves has the data.

      Who cares if some small-scale spammer got their hands on the leaked data? They don't have the skills, resources, or knowledge of how to abuse it.

      The fact that the huge data mining companies like Equifax, Facebook, and Google are building such databases is far more concerning from a privacy point of view.

    6. Re: Oh wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scathing report is the equivalent of a pat on the back. No go find me more election data, but be more careful.

    7. Re:Oh wow by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Indeed. What needs to happen in cases of negligence like this that could not really get any more gross (considering what was to be protected) is that the CEO and the CISO go to prison for a few years. In addition, anybody that has their data stolen should, say, get $500 just by asking for it and the full damage including legal costs if they did suffer more.

      Before we have serious consequence for such extreme screw-ups, nothing is going to change.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Oh wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they should draw a red line on the issue.

    9. Re:Oh wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bigger problem is that Equifax themselves has the data.

      Real question - then who should have the data? In our credit based economy unless someone holds the data of your credit history how are businesses to decide if you are credit worthy enough to lend to or be given a credit card? How do balance data needs of businesses with privacy of individuals who want to work with those businesses?

    10. Re:Oh wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      building in some real accountability would be a good start. destroying the slave/credit based economy and hanging the usurers would be better.

    11. Re:Oh wow by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

      A scathing report? That will show them!

      Ye!
      In meantime all they income indicators for 2017 are green and seems like "one of the largest in U.S. history" data breach does not even deserve congress hearings.

  2. Scathing!!!1 by nwaack · · Score: 0

    Ooh, a scathing report!!! On the punishment severity scale that must be somewhere between a slap on the wrist and taking away some of their Schrute bucks.

  3. Shucks by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    And they thought _strrev() was a secure way to encrypt the user passwords. I guess this time they will switch to ROT13. Twice, for extra security!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, next time they will upgrade the logging system to send all of the logs generated to /dev/null just to be extra safe. /partial sarcasm

      Note for the technically challenged: It's partial because the result is no logs at all. Which ultimately means they will do it again but be more careful not to get caught or be held liable.

  4. great, now... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...let's stop the Federal government 'picking winners' entirely, and see a report about the 'entirely preventable' 2007-2008 credit crash where the Congress-selected private firms that provided bond ratings simply didn't do the one thing they were tasked to do: objectively appraise and rate bundled funds as to riskiness?

    I think suing those firms into oblivion, jailing their entire management team for fraud, and then NOT picking ANY private firms as "official" successors designated by the Federal Government will remind the marketplace that information too has value and the lack of any official designation means that investors will have to manage their OWN risk.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:great, now... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      let's stop the Federal government 'picking winners' entirely

      Well, since the voters can't be bothered, how do you propose we do it?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:great, now... by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Accept the consequences of our choices as a society until voters can be bothered. Unless you're going to carry the torch on this topic to get the voters to care a little bit sooner or overthrow the government and try to fix things, there really isn't a lot left to do about it.

    3. Re:great, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The primary reason that companies seek government contracts is so they can utterly fail to do anything at all, and still get all the money.

      You can't fix perfect.

    4. Re:great, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since the voters can't be bothered

      I think that's rather disingenuous. People can't vote for politicians who aren't running--or at least, randomly voting in people you think will "make things better" isn't effective. Meanwhile, politicians that are running on a specific platform often explicitly refuse to follow through because they become "enlightened" once reaching Washington--ie, they aren't willing to do what needs to be done and promptly fired by voters when the economic chaos follows.

    5. Re:great, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since the voters can't be bothered, how do you propose we do it?

      Thus begins the road to idiocracy.

    6. Re: great, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the voters CAN be bothered. I'm not a voter myself, but I'm bothered. People who vote for criminal politician on the left, people who vote for criminal politician on the right... Maybe they haven't been bothered enough to provoke what they already know, into conscious thought: That government in all its past forms during humanity's latest run here has been oppressive, and a system where there is ANY ONE SINGLE PERSON with the power to single-handedly define how ANYTHING goes, is a stupid, absolutely broken system that does not operate with regard to reality. Simple.

      There are far too few seats in government, for government's reach. I mean come on, how many people in this country? Ratio to how many politicians? This is common sense. We are a slave plantation.

      Rich people are not going to be controlling local politics much longer. I'm not a voter. Instead, I recognize my power to be voted FOR in the future. This extends beyond me, though, and that is my point. This is a paradigm that has been rooting and which now is coming to broad daylight.

      Look at midterms. It's already happening. I'm 28 and let me tell you, the youngsters born in the late nineties... They don't give a flying fuck at a rolling donut hole for socio-political antiquities. And neither the fuck do I. Instead, I care about the well being of humanity at large, and that is certainly still the popular consensus among most people in the world. And I don't give a fuck if people don't like that. What's good for us all is not the business of anyone who doesn't think for us all.

      Also, older people get tired of fighting and eventually die, and old ways go with them. It's a simple truth, I mean no harm. It's just how it is. If older generations don't swing it, and even if they do, there are those of us who are smiled at by disillusioned old women, and we're going to tear this fucking thing to the ground and build what is needed right back up. It's not as complicated as the constant barrage of news and madness makes it out to be and it's going to be like ripping a bandaid off when it finally fucking comes to it.

      People do listen with a raised brow to those of us who know innately how to take care of Earth and humanity. In fact, we all know innately how. That expertise is diverse and unique from every person to the next, but those of us who have bigger pictures in mind, we are talking about them and common sense will prevail.

      Common sense always prevails.

      Clock keeps ticking.

    7. Re: great, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually what got us here. They were all "ripping off the band-aid", except back then I think it was called "shifting the paradigm" or something like that. But it turned out that a small group of people who "knew better" actually didn't. But please, by all means... I'm sure this time, it will be different.

    8. Re: great, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no. The invisible free hand of the market will sort it out. Along with negative externalities, free riders and the tragedy of the commons. Only two things are needed. Tax cuts for the rich and fewer regulations for those same rich. Three things, to ban abortion and deviant sexual activities like anything other than missionary position.

    9. Re:great, now... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      What Congress-selected firms? There are three firms that control 95%, but there are several other competitors.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    10. Re:great, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      private firms that provided bond ratings simply didn't do the one thing they were tasked to do: objectively appraise and rate bundled funds as to riskiness?

      They maximised shareholder value and profits, and pawned that crappy debt on other people by labelling it as AAA rated debt ... that's kind of the goal of capitalism, isn't it?

      It's all one big Ponzi scheme, and always will be, because greed will win every time, and the players will always value profit over ethics.

      The companies who rated junk debt as AAA rated debt, and the companies packaging up that debt and selling it knew exactly what they were doing. They just didn't give a fuck.

    11. Re: great, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot to add "for reproduction only"

  5. A scathing report! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But because it's authored by Republicans I'm sure their solution is a market driven solution. I'm sorry to say that something this egregious shouldn't have a market driven solution.

    1. Re: A scathing report! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not! We should have the gubermint do it because they never get hacked.

  6. Scathing A Fucking Goat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd get more action, and public outrage if you scathed a fucking goat, than the non-fallout from the Equifax breach.

    No penalty.

    No public outcry.

    No change what-so-fucking-ever .

    Equifax is laughing their fucking asses off. 'Wow, bro! We almost got wrecked. Let's do that again!!!!!'

    1. Re:Scathing A Fucking Goat by nwaack · · Score: 1

      Nah, there was definitely public outcry, the government just didn't care. Equifax must've provided our congress-critters with some REALLY high quality recreational drugs.

    2. Re:Scathing A Fucking Goat by I+kan+Spl · · Score: 1

      There wasn't really a huge public outcry.

      Slashdot is not the demographics of the country as a whole. The vast majority of the population only has a vague idea of what a credit rating is, what it is used for, and what could happen if the information gets out.

      The news folks went and interviewed random Joe/Jill-on-the-streets on this issue when it happened. The majority response was "What's an Equifax?".

      --
      My UID is prime and so is this number: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0.
    3. Re:Scathing A Fucking Goat by saider · · Score: 1

      It is a distraction to divert attention away from the government's failure to secure the data of millions of security clearance applicants.

      OMB data breach - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Personnel_Management_data_breach

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    4. Re:Scathing A Fucking Goat by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it was a deliberate distraction but FFS the OMB breach should be far and away the biggest concern! Its a major compromise that put intelligence assets at significant risk, and basically every federal employee and their families in all the same ways the Equifax breach and others do.

      We also have a lot of reason to think China was behind it.

      Frankly the way it was handled is disgusting. Firstly being and Obama admin failure the press basically ignored it to the degree they could. Because it was China the politicians did nothing in terms of retaliation or punitive actions.

      Really forget the damned Russia investigation we need to be investigating China and every one in governments ties to it! How is a top interpol official can just disappear in China and it gets virtually no press coverage, and nobody on the hill talks about it but we go weeks because the Saudis kill a some Muslim brotherhood propaganda mouthpiece; because woop de doo he got a few opinions published in some our rags a few times therefore anyone touching him is a threat democracy.

      Two things are clear:
      China owns our government and press corps.

      Our government is absolutely in capable of protecting our information assets as organized today, while there are some smart people at NIST and the NSA they are not making the decisions around how the chicken coup is guarded. I would argue until the Federal government is able to re-establish itself as an exemplar for good information security and asset protection they have no business telling anyone else what to do. Make some standards, prove them out in government first and then if they really are good, regulate and force them on others but ONLY then

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Scathing A Fucking Goat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you mean the OPM "breach"? that wqas actually the scum in washington hiring a chinese state actor to handfle US gov records then acting surprised when they shared it with the chinese state. no exactly a hack or breach in the sense it's usually used. just boring old treason by the pigs in washington.

  7. Of course by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

    Equifax is part of a sector of the financial industry that makes some tidy profit monetizing fear of the incompetence of the financial industry. It is not exactly surprising they could not wrap their heads around how competent they needed to be to not get caught. But then again, having been caught being incompetent, how much do they care?

  8. I know there'll be a lot of outrage on this thread by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but is anyone going to actually change how they vote based on this? If not, then all that outrage is exactly as effective as this report...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  9. Re:I know there'll be a lot of outrage on this thr by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, next time I am voting for the other guy instead of that guy.

  10. If only the people writing this report had power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only the people writing this scathing report had the power to pass legislation to actually change something. Instead, they're stuck writing words!

    Where are the leaders of the country when you need them?

  11. Re:I know there'll be a lot of outrage on this thr by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    but is anyone going to actually change how they vote based on this?

    They had their chance last month... And in spite of it all... the GOP/DNC remains firmly entrenched for another two years. And you're right, the outrage is comedic, and a bit tragic...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  12. Hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA (government) collects and tracks everyone and these hypocrites are mouthing off about how other people are collecting data?

    These clowns that have almost never worked a real job in their lives and in some cases can't even handle their own emails are lecturing other people on what they did right and wrong to secure data? What is this kangaroo court bull crap?! Since when did the public answer to congress? Screw these wannabe oligarchs.

    The judicial system has the right to judge, not congress.

    This does not excuse Equifax at all.
    The point is that the imbeciles in congress should shut their mouths.

  13. I can Securitize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can securitize, i can has job pls?

    I have BA in musicology, good enough.

    Blinky light good, solid red light bad.

    pls to giving me job pls.

  14. Equifax is still in business by Streetlight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right. One question (of many) I have is why are they still in business? Why weren't put out of business? There'd still be two credit bureaus out there. I'm not sure who regulates this kind of operation but they sure weren't and haven't been doing their job.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:Equifax is still in business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Why weren't put out of business?

      What I want to know is why the Apache developers that allowed such an easily exploitable vulnerability to be shipped with their software weren't summarily marched out in front of a wall and shot to death!

    2. Re:Equifax is still in business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is actually a 4th credit reporting agency, i can remember what it is called. so putting one out of business leaves three.

    3. Re:Equifax is still in business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... why are they still in business?

      Because the corrupt US ideology demanding veneration of corporations means they can't be punished and their shareholders who profited (literally) from incompetent/criminal behaviour, are excessively rich and mustn't be punished. Plus, they are too big to fail/jail: If they're not the major vendor, the market they occupy is so vertical that removing their (incompetent) services would eliminate whatever 'free' market exists. Lastly, dumping social responsibilities like job creation, pensions, healthcare onto corporations means eliminating the psychopath results in destroying all the wealth owed to employees. (On paper at least: In reality, a corporation can refuse to pay anytime.)

    4. Re:Equifax is still in business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the sanctions weren't enough, they should have BEEN PUT out of business by the government.
      I mean you can't handle the data you have been entrusted with then you don't deserve.

      Have you asked any company you do business with if they use equifax?
      Have you told them I dont do business with you if you do business with equifax?
      No, no one did thats why they still are in business.. because 99% of people just dont care unless it affect them directly.
      Unless 1 000 000 get their identity stolen because of that breach then nothing is going to happen.

      You want the world to be ruled by money... you got it.

    5. Re:Equifax is still in business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innovis.

  15. Re:I know there'll be a lot of outrage on this thr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pfft. There's going to be outrage no matter what. This is Slashdot, after all.

  16. Coroporate death penalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Applying a corproate death penalty would be an excellent way to fix this problem. Nothing would be lost since there are other credit bureaus, and it's a function that's easy to replicate.

  17. Consequences? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Don't be silly. Corporations in America are never held to account for screwing people over.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Consequences? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Don't be silly. Corporations in America are never held to account for screwing people over.

      Unless it's The Rich who got ass-raped, in which case Heads Will Roll over it. But you, me, and all the other plebs? We're irrelevant, you're right.

    2. Re:Consequences? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Excellent point, my friend!

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    3. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For sure. Pretty much every government department or think-tank could write a 'strongly worded report' and jack shit would actually happen about it.

      If politicians feel a little unsettled by it, then they'll "deliver a robust solution" which will do absolutely nothing to fix the problem and will probably see a few plebs in jail while the managers and CxOs get pay rises after winning a fat government contract.

  18. ACIS WhAt DoEs ThAt EvEn MeAn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACIS_(disambiguation)

    Could someone please add the meaning of what ACIS stands for to wikipedia?
    Using acronyms in articles without mentioning their full meaning in an article should be punishable by keelhauling.

  19. What a crock! by oldgraybeard · · Score: 1

    OK, so the Congress that had both Dem and GOP email systems hacked, the house employing crooks to do IT support, the Obama administration which was in power and running things had the OPM hack happened. is going to ridiculed Equifax, granted Equifax screwed up, but this is just to Rich for me.

    Just my 2 cents ;)

  20. I'm not even sure I fucking care anymore. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Just like GMO crops, the data lost in the Equifax breach is already long-since in the wind, and no amount of barn-door-closing-after-the-horse-is-gone will reverse that. The data likely has been copied and sold dozens of times already, and nothing short of crashing the Moon into the Earth, destroying everything and everyone, could possibly ever erradicate all the copies, or find all the people responsible and all the people who had access to it. It may as well been uploaded to USENET, for fuck's sake. Therefore, just like the meme: I ain't even mad. Not anymore at least.

    What the fuck are they going to do, now, anyway? Round up all the Equifax execs responsible for this shitshow, introduce them to Monsieur Guillotine, then mount their severed heads on poles all up and down Wall Street? Sure, I'd like to see that, but it still won't change anything. Maybe institute some strong reforms of financial regulations and practices, enforced by federal law? LOL, they'll weasel out of it somehow, lobby the ever-loving fuck out Congress, and make sure none of it happens -- and with the Trump Administration around, they'll make damned sure none of it happens, hell they'll probably de-regulate them even more, for maximum consumer ass-raping potential the next time around.

    Want my advice what to do about this? Put your money in an old coffee can and bury it in your backyard. At this point that's safer than any bank, and until and unless all of Wall Street is marched out and publicly executed as a warning, I don't see where anything is going to change.

    1. Re:I'm not even sure I fucking care anymore. by remoteshell · · Score: 1

      Best advice I've heard in all morning! What brand of coffee do you recommend?

      --
      Just the washing instructions on life's rich tapestry
  21. Re:(((G-d's chosen))) dindu nuffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill
    Your
    Self

  22. You could vote in your primary by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    there were a ton of left wing candidates who accept no corporate PAC money that tried to primary the right wing "Clinton" Democrats. Most of them lost but a few (notably Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who took out the "young" 55 year old replacement for Nancy Pelosi).

    The real power in American politics is in primary elections. By the time it gets to the general it's too late. But that doesn't mean you can't vote in your primary.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You could vote in your primary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good is voting in a primary if all you get is Republican and Democrat, each towing their respective party's line? How to you prevent the Party from simply choosing the nominee they want, versus the one the people choose?

      Here in my state (Florida), you must be registered to one of the Two Sacred Parties to participate in the primaries. More than 27% of Floridians, like myself, are registered to third-parties or have no party affiliation (NPA), and are thus locked out of primary participation altogether, except for a handful of municipal or county officials. Even then, there's only one third-party candidate, and some of them are worse than the Republicans or Democrats!

      Back to the topic at hand: Equifax. Organizations which repeatedly violate the trust of the people they are supposed to serve (the general public), who allow incompetent members of their organization to expose the public's information to breach and theft, and who don't seem to care enough to change their ways, must be brought down, broken up, and restructured under the supervision of one or more entities with proven track-records of secure, fair, and trustworthy dealings with the public. Yes, there still are some of those out there.

    2. Re:You could vote in your primary by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Back to the topic at hand: Equifax. Organizations which repeatedly violate the trust of the people they are supposed to serve (the general public), who allow incompetent members of their organization to expose the public's information to breach and theft, and who don't seem to care enough to change their ways, must be brought down, broken up, and restructured under the supervision of one or more entities with proven track-records of secure, fair, and trustworthy dealings with the public. Yes, there still are some of those out there.

      And how long will such "supervision" with "proven track records of secure, fair, and trustworthy dealing with the public" stay that way when they make money hand over fist by being a little bit less "secure, fair, and trustworthy"?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  23. So scathing that they'll never be neglectful again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We wouldnt want to fine them now would we?

  24. 148 million... by scott365 · · Score: 1

    At what point do we just go ahead and say "everybody?" 148M = basically everybody in the US with credit history. Let's fix this news headline ... "Equifax screws EVERBODY"

  25. "The Company" failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the HUMANS who run the company failed, and they should lose their jobs; their stock options, and for the rest of their lives work topay back what their malfeasance cost their customers. It's called "corporate accountability"!

  26. Business secrets theft befor the breach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember Equifax getting worried that a nation was trying to steal its trade secrets to set up a similar business back home?

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/before-it-was-hacked-equifax-had-a-different-fear-chinese-spying-1536768305

  27. Re:I know there'll be a lot of outrage on this thr by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

    Ballot initiatives were somewhat successful in bringing in some nice electoral changes, mostly with regard to district drawing, in certain states.

    Similar initiatives could be used to end First-Past-The-Post (I think Maine voted for the first time using instant runoff in this election), which would remove the spoiler effect and make third parties viable.

    As long as FPTP prevails, the 2-party system will remain. It's not just about who people vote for, but the choices they have. Bernie Sanders is an Independent, but he only had a real chance running as a Democrat.

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  28. Request not to deal with Equifax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I get a new mortgage or credit card, I should be able to ask the loan company to not send my information to Equifax, and also ask the loan company to not request information about me from Equifax.

    Here's a way to do that: The loan company would give me a list of all the credit bureaus that the loan company deals with. I would get the option to choose one of those credit bureaus, and tell the loan company, "Please don't send information about me to this credit bureau, or request information about me from them." Of course, I'd pick Equifax.

    Besides protecting me, this would be a way to punish Equifax - by drying up their source of information, and their business.

    1. Re:Request not to deal with Equifax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd get that request honoured in writing. I can totally see a loan officer sitting there hearing your request and then just submitting your information to Equifax anyway once you're out the door. Two reasons for this:

      1) It's "procedure". In other words, it's how our company always operates and we're not going to change for you, but we'll kiss your ass and make you think that's what we're doing.

      2) You could be dealing with a moron who actually believes Equifax learned their lesson, and that your request to exclude a specific credit bureau means that you have something to hide.

  29. Begins ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BEGINS ???

    You must be new here.

    Do you like money ?
    I like money too...

  30. Stop Using Debt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Credit Reporters service the Debt industry, not you. So do not use debt.

    This will require increased earnings and savings on your part.

    Buy your house , car, boat, in Cash.

    Do not use credit cards or Bank cards.
    Go Dark... and they won't have your data to steal.

    Buy your own Yellow Vest in cash,
    & join the revolution.

  31. My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 20 years ago I sent a legal letter to them and other credit reporting agencies and I informed them that all data referencing me is MY intellectual property and they were ordered to destroy all data and material which references me in any form or else they agree to pay me ten million dollars or they can opt out by simply destroying all information.

    As a result, I have no concern for any credit score because I don't buy things on credit.