Slashdot Mirror


China Gets on the Bandwagon To Provide Global Satellite Internet (qz.com)

Over the weekend, China launched a satellite into low-earth orbit, the first step of a plan to provide global satellite internet to people who still don't have reliable access. From a report: Nearly 3.8 billion people are unconnected to the internet, and women and rural poor are particularly affected. The satellite, called Hongyun-1, took off at China's national launching site Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center on Saturday (Dec. 22). Hongyun-1, or "rainbow cloud," is the first of 156 satellites of the same name developed by state-owned spacecraft maker China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC). CASIC intends to launch all the Hongyun satellites by around 2022 to form a constellation that will improve internet access in remote parts of China, and eventually in developing countries, a plan first announced in 2016. Most of the satellites will operate 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) above the earth, far lower than satellites are typically placed. The project is "moving the internet currently on the ground into the sky," said Hou Xiufeng, a spokesperson for CASIC, "It's China's first true low-orbit communication satellite... The launch will greatly boost commercial space."

86 comments

  1. Yeah by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    Hard fucking pass.

    1. Re:Yeah by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Agreed! I don't want to be part of the China mass surveillance program. If the choice for me ever become between Chinese-provided satellite internet and none, I will happily and readily unplug.

    2. Re: Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay happily in US or UK surveilance then...

    3. Re: Yeah by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      The areas this is being deployed for are already unplugged. There's nowhere for the plug to go but in.

  2. Rural America will finally be able to get internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rural America will finally be able to get internet!

  3. With all the planned low-orbit satellites planned by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    will there be any room left ?

    Should we just plan on building a ring of these around the Earth?

  4. Re:Rural America will finally be able to get inter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike anywhere in China, where the internet isn't allowed because Han Chinese are too stupid to handle freedom.

  5. Re:With all the planned low-orbit satellites plann by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    They will just start running into each other. Survival of the fittest.

  6. 155 to go! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    155 more by 2022.

    Almost 1/week, I believe that.

    Propaganda needs to be plausible, this isn't.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:155 to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They release more than one at a time you utter dipshit. You are a true moron of the old school of blathering.

    2. Re:155 to go! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They just launched one you halfwit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  7. Re:With all the planned low-orbit satellites plann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a moron.

  8. Here goes the Sinophobia again by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny

    I look forward to well-reasoned arguments that are totally not Sinophobic and dog whistle racism, just like all the other threads that mention China.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      I look forward to the day people stop throwing dog whistle around like its actually a thing

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks Chang. Do you work for a chink tank?

    3. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Strider- · · Score: 1

      The limitations imposed by Chinese internet filtering are pretty well known.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    4. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a chink told me the sky was blue I'd look up to check. Only for a second, because he'd probably steal my shoes while I wasn't looking.

      Chinese are bastards. Sneaky, lying, bastards.

    5. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      I look forward to the day America is not beset with Chicom propagandists who support the offshoring of all jobs to China, China's rampant forced organ harvesting of their political and religious prisoner populations, and their disappeared human rights attorneys and pro-democracy activists, etc., etc.

    6. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      I think you have it all wrong. People have no problem with the Chinese or their culture. The problem people have is with the Chinese government. You act as if you are unaware of their actions.

      - they have been suppressing dissent and then hunting down dissidents to jail them
      - the re-education prisons that they are putting Muslims into
      - the massive video surveillance network they are building out
      - the social ranking system they are using keep "undesirables" from traveling or buying things
      - let's not forget the organ harvesting program that at first "don't exist" and the later "we don't do that anymore"
      - they refuse to allow women to inherit things which is causing the gender ratio to be skewed

      I'm not saying all other governments are angels but Chinese government is downright evil. The Chinese people are as much a victim of them as the rest of us.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    7. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you truly not aware of the "Great Chinese Firewall"? China has a lot of things, but not actual internet.

    8. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It's not racism if it's about a political difference with the Chinese government. I can be opposed to the Soviet Union without being anti-Slav or opposed to the Nazis without being anti-Aryan.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    9. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have no problem with the Chinese or their culture. The problem people have is with the Chinese government.

      Pretty much this.

      A government which is openly trying to spy on everybody, exert its influence on everyone, and which repeatedly demonstrates a complete disdain for any form of law or the lives of its citizens is not to be trusted.

      Of course, written like that, I'll point out I don't trust most any other government either.

      I know and like Chinese people, Jewish people, Russian people, and American people.

      That doesn't mean I like or trust the Chinese government, the Israeli government, the Russian government, or the American government.

      In fact all four of those governments are ran by complete fucking assholes who I believe to be corrupt bastards.

    10. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      I look forward to well-reasoned arguments that are totally not Sinophobic and dog whistle racism, just like all the other threads that mention China.

      It's not that I distrust the Chinese any more than other countries, it's just that I simply credit the Chinese with being capable of the same skulduggery as the US, European countries or Russia. So when I see them getting in on the ground level in the emerging LEO satellite internet industry and knowing that in China no company is really private, the Chinese government always has their fingers in everything to some degree, I have to ask: Is there a better way for the Chinese to do what they are seeing the NSA doing than to build large international presence in the LEO satellite internet market, so they can to conduct wholesale interception and archiving of every scrap of as much internet data foreign and domestic that passes through their satellite internet backbone? This isn't paranoia, in view of that the US/UK in particular are doing, the Chinese would be dumber than a brick if they did not do this as well.

    11. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then try starting one instead of baiting...

    12. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      That and usage of the word gaslight.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    13. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, how's this:

      How can China expect to export the internet when China itself doesn't even have the internet? Great firewall and all that.

    14. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I notice that the last propaganda piece didn't result in anti-China posts.It backfired spectacularly.

      Quick! America! Find something so we can take an opportunity to piss on the Chinese again!

    15. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classic taking a play out of the Israeli state handbook of propaganda. Associate a country with an ethnic group, then denounce anyone criticizing the country as being racist.

      Fuck every last person that gives DNS-and BIND modpoints. He is a hateful admittedly russian troll which spends most of his time saying hateful things about Americans and Europeans and is now claiming those actions are wrong, but only when China is involved.

    16. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to mod him up just to piss you off.

    17. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. The communist dungeon best known for censorship and oppression of human rights wants to be my ISP.

      I look forward to connecting to the internet via the communist Chinese satellite system and using Google Dragonfly to search for information about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.

    18. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I look forward to well-reasoned arguments that are totally not Sinophobic and dog whistle racism, just like all the other threads that mention China.

      These suckers have ADS-B and AIS monitors, so the Chinese government will be able to monitor--in realtime--all aircraft and marine vessel movements across the globe:

      * https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/china-launches-first-satellite-for-broadband-communication-118122200369_1.html

      So they not only have a surveillance state of their own citizens, it will be possible to have the same information for the rest of the planet.

      There are of course other people doing this, but I trust NAV Canada (watching ADS-B via their Aireon) more than China, personally.

      Are these thoughts (overly?) xenophobic or paranoid?

    19. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here here

    20. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I look forward to the day when my old lady gets up out of the chair and brings me my beer, in a glass this time, huh? *and bring a twinkie for Mr. Davis*

    21. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      In fact all four of those governments are ran by complete fucking assholes who I believe to be corrupt bastards.

      Yeah, yeah, yeah, they just came down and took over while nobody was looking.

      Don't be an idiot. These people have to win elections. Well, we don't know about China exactly, but west of the Urals? People create their own problems. They don't resist unaccountable authority, on the contrary, they cheer it.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    22. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Obviously! There are no Chinese people in the Chinese government, military, not a single one is collecting a government check, or supports it in any way, right? Where do you suppose they are from? I am fascinated by this hard line that people draw between themselves and their government. I think it's to apply plausible deniability for what the government does, with full consent of theirs in the "west".

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    23. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Well now you've convinced me! Obviously, people always support the actions of their government. I suppose we should nuke North Korea because after all, they aren't victims of their government, they totally back it 100%. /s

      How are you this dumb?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    24. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Did I say anything about North Korea? Your absurd distractions are dumb.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    25. Re:Here goes the Sinophobia again by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Forgot to ask, since you brought them up: What's the North Korean army made up of? Martians?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  9. Great firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will the great firewall be built in, or will traffic have to be routed via a ground station? God forbid users be able to communicate directly with one another via the network.

  10. Re:With all the planned low-orbit satellites plann by treymichaelcook · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look at it this way - right now there are more than 52,000 merchant ships sailing the seas. Have we run out of space in the ocean? And then add in the fact that space is 3d, so adding in vertical stacks, the number of satellites that can be safely fit in LEO is huge. Or for harder numbers, the earth has a surface area of 510 million km^2. Figure 1 km^2 area per satellite, and 1 km between orbital levels, and LEO orbits from say 600 km to 1000 km, and you get 204 billion satellites.

  11. Re:Rural America will finally be able to get inter by treymichaelcook · · Score: 1

    I would wager on Space X being up and running first with their Starlink service.

  12. Chinternet for poor rural women, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They just want to make sure everyone is under total surveillance. China is a disgusting country that fears the flow of information and does everthing possible to stop it. The spiritual opposite of Internet and freedom.

    Nobody wants any kind of service from these foul commie slopes.

  13. One weird Lunar Eclipse trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The light in the Earth's shadow can't change because the moon is passing through it. So how does the lunar eclipse start out black, and end red?

    Lunar eclipse time lapse
    Next eclipse: January 20 2019
    Nat Geo: Why is eclipse red?

    For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.

    1. Re:One weird Lunar Eclipse trick by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Because the human eye is pathetic at seeing things that have vastly different brightness. As long as part of the surface is brightly lit, your eye perceives the rest as dark. See this illustration, If you use a camera and overexpose the bright side, you see that the dark side is indeed red: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:One weird Lunar Eclipse trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is not that it is not red, or is red. The issue is that it fades in. The human eye is actually pretty good at seeing differences in brightnesses. If you look carefully, you can often see the dark portion of a quarter moon or half moon, which is lit by light reflected off Earth towards the moon.

    3. Re:One weird Lunar Eclipse trick by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      That's called Earthshine, and it is very much brighter than the total eclipsed part of the Moon, plus the Moon is much dimmer since it is only partially lit. The full Earth is very large and bright as seen from the Moon. The tiny bit of sunlight that is refracted by the Earth's atmosphere during a lunar eclipse is nothing in comparison.

    4. Re:One weird Lunar Eclipse trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have good analysis. I will add that to things to check.

      Can you also give your analysis of the cause of red (and to lesser extent, white) light on the back of the moon?
      Solar Eclipse
      Look for HDR composite with blown-out inside edge of moon.

  14. the best movie on China: by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
  15. Dog Whistle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dog Whistle definition:
    I don't like your argument, but can't find a factual way to dispute it. My only methods to dispute it make me look like a total dumbass dipshit. Therefore, I will call your argument a "dog whistle" for racism. Since your argument wasn't racist either all I can do is claim your argument is "secretly racist".

    This is how calling someone "articulate" became an anti-black racist "dog whistle". Not making this up, someone got in trouble for describing a black man as articulate. I'm assuming the accuser assumed black men can't be articulate, which makes you wonder who was the real racist in the dispute.

  16. He who controls the spice ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He who controls the spice controls the universe.

    Controlling and providing internet access is pretty much the same thing ... the biggest ad network and spying mechanism on the planet.

    Why am I not surprised by this? Everybody wants internet users to be beholden to them and to have access to their data.

  17. Re:FCK U idiot Title writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinaman with pre-school English detected

  18. Re: Rural America will finally be able to get inte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You've mistaken "FEEdom" for freedom. There is no freedom in stupid america.

  19. 3 strikes oops.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err I mean 1 strike and they hall you off to the communist re-education camps.

  20. "Internet" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the airquotes when you talk about Chinese "internet".

  21. Re:With all the planned low-orbit satellites plann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look at it this way - right now there are more than 52,000 merchant ships sailing the seas. Have we run out of space in the ocean? And then add in the fact that space is 3d, so adding in vertical stacks, the number of satellites that can be safely fit in LEO is huge.

    Or for harder numbers, the earth has a surface area of 510 million km^2. Figure 1 km^2 area per satellite, and 1 km between orbital levels, and LEO orbits from say 600 km to 1000 km, and you get 204 billion satellites.

    Sorry, this analysis totally misses
      1) most ships and airplanes travel coordinated, non-intersecting, paths.
      2) ships and airplanes also maneuver to avoid each other
        3) while you have low density you also have very high sweep-rates

    Neither is the case with satellites (although #1 might be possible), and we will soon see a need for such. The actual statistics on oritiabl collision with either other satellites or misc launch debris is already getting pretty grim.

  22. Re:Rural America will finally be able to get inter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly as I posted above; I love rural America and hate living in the city. My best memories is when my uncle took me to the woods between the cities of Rosamund and Gorman, California.

  23. Re:With all the planned low-orbit satellites plann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ships on the sea are puttering along by comparison. Satellites are moving TREMENDOUSLY fast. They cover much, much more ground (well, sky) - at that altitude, they are probably moving something like 15,000 mph. Compare this to a container ship that may travel at something around 25 mph. And when these satellites collide they will create massive clouds of debris and potentially a cascading chain of collisions that would render LEO unusable, commonly called the Kessler Effect. A couple of container ships might bounce off each other, drop a few container, and keep on steaming (deadlines, you know). In short - these suckers move fast, and there is a much higher probability of their courses intersecting catastrophically than a ship on the sea and with much more disastrous consequences.

  24. Re:FCK U idiot Title writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me Chinese me pway joke.. Me put Pee Pee in your Coke.

  25. Re:With all the planned low-orbit satellites plann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will there be any room left ?

    Not if the renowned Slashdot collaborator from San Jose decides to place himself into orbit to have better spam control.

  26. LEARN HOW TO READ ARTICLES WIMPUSS DIPSHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "After the tests with the first Hongyun satellite, another four satellites will be launched by the end of 2020 to form a small network for the project’s trial run. Operational satellites will be launched after the first tests of the baseline network prove successful."

    The first is the testing prototype you dipshit, then they launch multiples every time you illiterate neckbearded cunt beta. Of course being a head-in-ass-Republican you can never admit you're so obviously, plainly wrong can you bitch?

  27. Re: With all the planned low-orbit satellites plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Satellite collision is an inevitable result since they arenâ(TM)t recovered from orbit when they run out of fuel.

  28. So what do the evil Chicoms want? by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    World domination of course.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  29. Should I care? by AndyKron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here we are live from [censored] and we're having a [censored] time! Come see [censored] at the [censored]!

  30. Re:Rural America will finally be able to get inter by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Spies deep in rural America will finally have a trusted network to send information collected out with.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  31. space isn't the issue, spectrum is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there maybe virtually unlimited space for all these LEOs, its spectrum that is limited.

  32. Why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in the hell would want to use the Chinese version of this. Even the Chinese would avoid it like the plague if they could connect via another less restrictive one.

  33. Re: With all the planned low-orbit satellites plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of container ships colliding are going to crumple like theyâ(TM)re made of putty and then sink. They are not designed as giant bumper cars.

  34. Re: With all the planned low-orbit satellites pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, they are.

  35. Re:Rural America will finally be able to get inter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. The US government will not fund something that eats the profits of its sponsors.

  36. aircraft and ship monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's their frequency allocation? Some comments on orbital slots, but there's also finite amount of spectrum available as well.

    What's more interesting IMHO is that these suckers have ADS-B and AIS receivers so that aircraft and ships can be tracked:

    * https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/china-launches-first-satellite-for-broadband-communication-118122200369_1.html

    While the global sat Internet may be useful, CN is more interested about monitoring things.

    Throw some lenses and image sensors, and you have pervasive surveillance of the planet:

    * https://warontherocks.com/2018/11/persistent-eye-in-the-sky-how-commercial-satellites-can-help-the-navy-achieve-superior-maritime-awareness/
    * https://www.c4isrnet.com/intel-geoint/2018/12/03/is-near-instant-satellite-imagery-in-the-near-future/

  37. It’s the easiest way to control the mass by ErstO · · Score: 1

    Of course this makes sense, both Russia and China figured out how to manipulate the people through misinformation, it’s cheaper then shipping them off to gulags

  38. Re: Rural America will finally be able to get int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no freedom in your stupid head you fucking spoiled American. Try live in a third-world country for a few days!

    Tard.

  39. Glad to hear it. by John.Banister · · Score: 2

    One thing I worried about when learning of other LEO Satellite Internet was the satellites being shot down as they pass over China. So, China putting up their own constellation that could be shot down in retaliation sounds like motivation for them not to throw stones. Plus, it will be amusing when they achieve commercial competitiveness by putting up internet for the rest of the world that is less censored than the internet that they provide domestically.

    1. Re:Glad to hear it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, its that ourboros thing!!! they knew it all along!!!!

  40. Re: Rural America will finally be able to get int by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have freedom to make fun of our leaders, no so in China, unless you want your organs donated.

  41. Re:With all the planned low-orbit satellites plann by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Space is big but it's more complicated than that. One kilometer between satellites is only a little over 0.1 seconds in the direction they travel since LEO is ~7.8 km/s. You also can't just lay them in parallel like lanes on a freeway, the orbits looks like a sinusoidal so the orbits intersect and get squished together at maximum inclination. Finally any satellites you're discarding must pass through the other orbital layers despite orbits intersection as you can't keep the exact same orbit from a different altitude. You can see a simulation with the orbital planes here. A few back-of-the-napkin estimates suggest to me that to keep all satellites an an offset and at >1 second from each other you'll probably not want more than ~1000 in a LEO orbital plane. That would put the total at something more like half a million. There is currently about 500 operating LEO satellites...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  42. Re:FCK U idiot Title writers by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

    So make a GNSS reciever that ignores any data from GPS satelites iand instead bases its calculationd on Galileo etc instead, presto no chance for the US to directly controll the input dara unless ofc the por in a call to ESa GSA and tell thrm to transmit bad data or else, but that is a different question and allso way ot. Have a nice day

  43. Re: Rural America will finally be able to get in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And your leaders are free to make fun of you all too..

  44. Re: Rural America will finally be able to get in by spinitch · · Score: 1

    Chinese can make fun of your leaders just as freely as you. We have freedom to make fun of our leaders, no so in China, unless you want your organs donated.

  45. Re:Rural America will finally be able to get inter by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    No doubt starlink will be in place before China, but I wonder if 1-web will be first? There are several others, but I think that starlink or 1-web will be up first.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  46. Re:Rural America will finally be able to get inter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt starlink will be in place before China

    No doubt WindBourne is sucking Elon's penis.

  47. CHINA provides SPECTRUM users backdoor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & imo (in modems w/ a login screen yet no routing (logon to WHAT is the question, right?)).

    I did as in years past & requested a modem w/ routing (for creating firewalling, port filtering, DNS change etc.).

    Got CANCELLED by policy @ warehouse level!

    AFTER I went to Spectrum local outlets asking for a NEW modem w/ more than 1 port WHICH I DID IN THE PAST no problem & got before.

    They had no NEW DOCSIS 3.1 COMPLIANT MODEMS w/ more than 1 port @ LOCAL outlets (thus request to their warehouse THEIR PEOPLE DID 4 ME).

    I'm 'stuck' unless I buy a firewall router to bridge w/ a NO SECURITY "dumb brick" - I DON'T TRUST THIS THING & I'd rather BUY an "ALL IN 1" cablemodem!

    I need DNS change/portfilter/firewalling in a MODEM/ROUTER to AVOID a China TECHNICOLOR REBRAND modem that "ODDLY" has a LOGON SCREEN NOBODY CAN ACCESS: Not EVEN the ISP despite sending a bin config file & WHY A LOGON TO A MACID IN A NIC (dumb passthru)

    I had to RIG MY HOSTS FILE JUST TO SEE A LOGON SCREEN!

    (In other routing featuring modems they gave me in the past I never had THAT issue)

    Their techs @ ALL LEVELS SEE it on their private WAN they peer up to other networks (& THEY CAN' LOGON EITHER).

    QUESTION - WHY INSERT LOGON CODE INTO A DUMB MODEM?

    SCREAMS "bad" imo like a NETWORK OF ATTACK BOTS in remotely compromisable 'modems'!

    APK

    P.S.=> Correct me IF I'm wrong (I hope I am)

  48. Re:With all the planned low-orbit satellites plann by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

    World space agencies have studied the issues and have written "guidelines" (see sect. 4) and self-policing policies, which tend to trickle down to the commercial sector. With government approvals in mind, there seems to be the equivalent of a "land rush" of commercial providers securing orbital real estate.