Slashdot Mirror


FCC Accused of Colluding With Big Cable To Game 5G Legal Challenge (theregister.co.uk)

An anonymous reader shares an excerpt from a report via The Register: U.S. telecoms regulator the FCC has been accused of colluding with companies it is supposed to oversee in order to protect a controversial decision over new 5G networks. Chair of the House Commerce chair, Frank Pallone, has sent a letter to FCC chair Ajit Pai asking for copies of communications between the FCC and the big telcos regarding legal challenges to the regulator's 5G order, which forces local governments to charge a flat fee for installing new base stations. In the letter [PDF], Pallone strongly implies that the committee has heard from a whistleblower.

"It has come to our attention that certain individuals at the FCC may have urged companies to challenge the order the Commission adopted in order to game the judicial lottery procedure and intimated the agency would look unfavorably towards entities that were not helpful," it reads. In effect, the letter alleges that FCC staff -- almost certainly from Pai's office -- put pressure on the big telcos to challenge an order that is designed to benefit them as a way of gaming the judicial system so the case didn't end up in a court likely to overturn it.

104 comments

  1. You don't say? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    The whore colluding with the john against the government? No way!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re: You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well just watch and see what happens. Off hand I would say this is the perfect opportunity to see what these people are really up to. Literally get out the popcorn.

    2. Re:You don't say? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The whore colluding with the john against the government? No way!

      Collusion is just how business is conducted these days, amirite?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re: You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err.. no, blow jobs are the stock and trade of business. Err...

    4. Re: You don't say? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Err.. no, blow jobs are the stock and trade of business. Err...

      Still livin in the 90's, fo shizzle.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:You don't say? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Calling Ajit Pai a whore is an insult to whores.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    6. Re:You don't say? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Collusion is just how business is conducted these days, amirite?

      Giuliani is that you?

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    7. Re:You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get government out of regulating businesses. He is doing a great job.

    8. Re: You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes even the central tenet of every business differs by a small amount

    9. Re:You don't say? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 3, Funny

      He is doing a great job.

      I agree! It takes a lot of butt-hole exercise to prevent prolapse when you're taking that much corporate dick.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    10. Re: You don't say? by Charbroiled++PENIS · · Score: 0

      Have some CHARBROILED PENIS toppings while watching Ajit Pai being hung for treason.

    11. Re:You don't say? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      Calling Ajit Pai a whore is an insult to whores.

      At least with a whore, there's a happy ending.

    12. Re: You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but we're talking about regulating a monopoly; which is necessary in this case given all the local government barriers of entry. Since capitalism is not an option here with only a single viable option in each jurisdiction, regulation is the only action that can be effective in the short term. It would take decades to undo all of the local pole rights written into law.

    13. Re:You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, you'd probably be better off calling him a criminal like most of the people donald's put in power.

    14. Re: You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That affair was well within regulation

    15. Re: You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you can allow competition at the last mile. Its pretty simple.

    16. Re: You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pai is an Obama appointee. You can't blame that on Trump.

    17. Re:You don't say? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Collusion is just how business is conducted these days, amirite?

      Giuliani is that you?

      Is crime even crime?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re: You don't say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In 2011, Pai was then nominated for aÂRepublican PartyÂposition on the Federal Communications Commission by PresidentÂBarack ObamaÂat the recommendation of Minority leaderÂMitch McConnell.[18]Â" wiki article

      Turns out he shouldn't have trusted the Republicans. Also, he wasn't chairman and thus had no power

    19. Re:You don't say? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't mean to insult working people who actually provide a valuable service to the population.

      I'd like to apologize.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. They should be charged by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    with treason and sentenced to death.

    1. Re:They should be charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, you nutty fuckstick.. Explain how any of this would be treason.. Or do you not know what the definition of treason is?

  3. Drain that Swamp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another win for the MAGA useful idiots

    Carrying water for billionaires

    1. Re: Drain that Swamp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Assholes and cunts, the whole lot of them.

    2. Re: Drain that Swamp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although Ajit Pai was first installed by Obama, Tom Wheeler did a much better job. This has nothing to do with draining the swamp.

      The best part about the Trump administration is that the overall effect has been to drain the swamp. The Muller Probe guilty pleas, the White House turnover, exposing corruption and collusion which threatens the United States itself - this is all great for our country.

      Nobody wants surgery to remove a tumor. It is a painful process, being cut open, having flesh removed, and installing a stint to drain the pus. However, it is often necessary to save the patient. Hang in there USA, it gets better.

    3. Re: Drain that Swamp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ajit Pai was picked by the Republicans, Obama appointed him as a bipartisan tradition. Pay attention. Obama was playing by 100% different rules than Trump, who knows no US traditions he doesn't violate intentionally.

    4. Re: Drain that Swamp! by kqs · · Score: 1

      The best part about the Trump administration is that the overall effect has been to drain the swamp. The Muller Probe guilty pleas, the White House turnover, exposing corruption and collusion which threatens the United States itself - this is all great for our country.

      Well, no. All of the corruption being removed now was installed by the Trump administration, so the overall effect is zero. And he's appointing new corrupt folks as quick as we're removing them, and now we don't have time to deal with the pre-existing corruption, so the overall corruption is increasing rapidly.

  4. Re: Subtext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True dat

  5. Color me surprised! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would've thought a "ex" ISP Shill would collude with ISPs. Crazy talk.

    1. Re: Color me surprised! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no I in collusion you see. Oh wait. Where are you going with that sawed off shotgun so early in the morning? I expect a full report hissy bitch

  6. Re: turd flinging app polluting i/osphere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So basically the corporate shill game is find the CEOs favorite consumer gouging move and then drop the boom on them? Makes sense in a really weird way

  7. Re:Subtext by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Informative

    Id I may point out, courts do not have to be corrupt for judges to have different policies on the bench, especially judges in different states and at different levels of state or federal judiciary. For cases involving millions of dollars and the profitability of entire industries, it is unsurprising that they and their attorneys would invest in "court shopping". It would be considered unethical for their lawyers _not_ to steer the cases to the venue that best serves their clients' interests.

  8. Re:Subtext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Different judges have different tendencies and views even without being corrupt. "Gaming" judge assignments is a known lawyering trick in several countries.

  9. Ammobox moment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government for the past 10 years has proven it won't charge, nevermind try and convict its own police officers for egregious abuses of their privileges, nevermind tacking on color of the law penalties.

    Half the voting public has chosen to vote in someone who is a complete RINO and former DINO over either a third party, or a first party representative who help up their beliefs.

    And the FCC has been a cesspool for the past 2 years.

    Now is the time to lock and load, or put out a bounty on the persons you believe most in need of house cleaning.

    1. Re:Ammobox moment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brave words from leftist anonymous cowards. But when exposed to the public you are as cheap tawdry and cowardly as Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi, AOC and any other left wing progressive fucktard.

      Since Democrats have decided to play fast and loose with government funding and the rule of law, do not expect kindness at the polls. And I don't plan to hit the brakes if I see one of them crossing the road.

    2. Re: Ammobox moment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, who isn't playing loose? Republicans will shut down government over deficit increases if they can exploit the situation for political favor, but when there's no Democratic president to tear down, and they want some shiney new ships, missiles, and lucrative defense contracts for their cronies, theyre all for putting more on the credit card.

      Please stop being worthless and use your damn brain.

    3. Re: Ammobox moment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta keep em on a short leeesh and smack em in the mouth if ya dislike it

  10. Re:Subtext by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

    "Id I may point out, courts do not have to be corrupt for judges to have different policies on the bench"

    The law is the law, so it requires either malice, incompetence, or both.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the Democrat who hates the FCC makes an accusation (with no evidence) with an inference that there's a whistle blower (no evidence) that Ajit Pal (evil decepticon) is corrupt and needs to be investigated.

    If there's a whistle blower (which I highly doubt) then they should present the evidence as well.

    Color me surprised the Democrats would follow their SOP playbook.

    1. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, where's your evidence he hasn't done anything?

    2. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he just makes sure you donâ(TM)t hear about it

    3. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked under the (U.S.) law evidence that a law has been broken rests with the prosecution. No one is require to present evidence that they are not guilty.

  12. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Id I may point out, courts do not have to be corrupt for judges to have different policies on the bench"

    The law is the law, so it requires either malice, incompetence, or both.

    You think the law is black and white and not open to interpretation? Or legislatures aren't clear?

    Many years ago, a state (I think TX: Google is failing me.) passed an open container law. The entire legislature vote for it. However, the law just said "open container" and the lawmakers assumed that everyone would "know" that it must means alcohol.

    They had to scramble to amend it because some sharp law professor pointed out that the law allows cops to arrest people who have open cans of Coke or open bags of potato chips. The judge would have to convict because of the way the law was written.

    1. Re:Really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Many years ago, a state (I think TX: Google is failing me.) passed an open container law. The entire legislature vote for it. However, the law just said "open container" and the lawmakers assumed that everyone would "know" that it must means alcohol.

      That phrase generally has a specific legal meaning, which returns me to my original point. Either malice (deliberately ignoring that meaning) or incompetence (not knowing that meaning) is required for the interpretation of the law to vary. The law can also be written maliciously and/or incompetently, of course, in order to attempt to cause such problems.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a judge and you cannot interpret the specific intended legal meaning of a law... The question must be raised... Should you be a fucking judge?

    3. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're a representative and you don't know how to write clear laws should you be a representative?

      A lot of the "specific legal meaning" of things has come through the judiciary because THEY try to be clear about what they write.

  13. More ISP choices seems like a good thing to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FCC forces limits on local governments to charge a flat fee for installing new base stations instead of collecting $2B worth of fees -- that sounds like a GOOD thing to me. If local governments were to charge the 5G carriers up the wazoo, those costs would be passed on to their customers. The FCC stepping in to limit fees means more 5G coverage going in and lower prices for us consumers.

  14. QUEENSRYCHE "Revolution Calling"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & this lyric from it: "Now I see the payoffs everywhere I look - who do you trust WHEN EVERYONE'S A CROOK?" - Queensryche "REVOLUTION CALLING"

    * Is it ME, or is the world going slowly nuts?

    (I've made a point of asking my elders this & they say "it's the world the past few years now, not you" & I've been on this planet for over 1/2 a century++ & THOSE I ASK, A LOT LONGER... even younger folks than I feel this way too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Seems a lot of things are crooked (& maybe it's always been that way to SOME extent BUT not like I see now + no, it's not that it's just "more exposed & faster now due to the internet" either)... apk

  15. Re: Subtext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your naÃveté is soooooo hot I could not resist replying in fact I have never seen such striking lack of awareness before

  16. Re: Subtext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly which laws are the law? State laws vary.

  17. I said it before and I'll say it again by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Informative

    is this gonna change how anyone votes in 2020? No? Then so what.

    As long as we keep voting in corrupt folks they're gonna keep being corrupt. And once again I'll drop this link to the only wing of any party that makes it a litmus test to refuse corporate PAC money. As always if anyone knows a GOP equivalent I'm all ears.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I said it before and I'll say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a pronoun problem. They are never just corrupt folk, they are either "our corrupt folk" who share "our values" or "their corrupt folk" who do not have "our values". And it should be remembered, their corrupt folk is worst.

    2. Re:I said it before and I'll say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Too bad that's the wing of the Democrat Party that wants to make success illegal and tax jobs out of the country.

    3. Re:I said it before and I'll say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... a GOP equivalent ...

      You're asking the people claiming rich people have more rights, to deny rich people the right to buy whatever they want. The rich already can't (legally) buy armies and assassins, they's no way they're going to avoid bribery and traitors too.

  18. Big cable? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    So, the major telecom operators are "big cable" now.
    I am waiting for the days we'll call the leaders of the democratic party "big ass".

    1. Re: Big cable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome big ass give me a handout. I like it!!!!!!!!!!!!! What does Marcellus Wallace look like to you? Your point (lameness filter encountered)

    2. Re:Big cable? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      we'll call the leaders of the democratic party "big ass".

      Nope. "Big ass" would clearly be in reference to the $75 Billion global strip club industry.

  19. The jobs are leaving the country anyway by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Trump outpaced Obama for outsourcing and he's a GOPper. We tried your way and it didn't work. Now try mine. It works. It worked in the 50s when we had a 90% top marginal and it'll work now.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  20. Once the U.S. eliminated a major competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once the U.S. eliminated a major competitor in MANUFACTURING machined goods (in Germany's defeat in WW2) we enjoyed that - now, we have competition in that arena too.

    APK

    P.S.=> You're not looking @ the OVERALL economic picture between THEN & NOW rsilvergun... apk

  21. What the hell kind of article is this by chispito · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Who wrote this?

    Chair of the House Commerce chair, Frank Pallone

    From the department of redundancy department.

    Not only has Pai's office pandered to Big Cable to an excessive degree in the past two years, pushing through changes vehemently opposed by everyone that isn't one of the main telcos, there has been a rumors that the regulator is actively working in secret with companies it is supposed to oversee.

    Grammatical errors aside, this writing is just... awful.

    But local government officials were very suspicions something untoward was going on.

    This whole affair is very suspicions indeed.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  22. Wow that's a lot of effort for a shit post by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    so I can't resist feeding you a bit more, even though I know we're not supposed to feed the trolls.

    WWII doesn't really matter in this context. It's a strawman you're using to distract from my main point, which is that giving all the money to the 1% hasn't stopped them from outsourcing jobs. We just borrowed $1 trillion and gave it to the 1% in the form of tax cuts and they used it for mother f*king stock buy backs. No jobs, no investment.

    Companies don't hire because they've got money, they hire to meet demand. That is why demand side economics works and supply side (aka trickle down) fails. That's the "OVERALL" economic picture that you're ignoring.

    But you're just an alt-right troll. You're not interested in solving problems or being right, just winning. I'm not the one that figured that out either, this guy is. He's got a whole series of videos on guys like you.

    Thing is, if you're being paid it's not enough. Eventually they'll eat you alive. And if you've drunk the kool-aid then stop. It's poisoned. Go watch the videos on the Alt-Right playbook linked above and learn how you've been had.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  23. Just great by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    In effect, the letter alleges that FCC staff -- almost certainly from Pai's office -- put pressure on the big telcos to challenge an order ...

    Now we can look forward to an endless series of tweets claiming "NO COLLUSION" from Ajit Pai and the FCC too -- sigh. :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Just great by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Now we can look forward to an endless series of tweets claiming "NO COLLUSION" from Ajit Pai and the FCC too -- sigh. :-)

      Nah. Pai knows the fix is in. The Trump Justice Department will never charge him with anything. The House will puff and bluster and hold hearings, then do nothing. Even if they decide to impeach, the Senate will never convict (yes, impeachment applies to more than just the president). We all know beyond a shadow of a doubt those gutless partisan fucks will toe the party line no matter what. Pai can do any fucking thing he wants, including outright criminal conspiracy, and get away with it. And he knows it. On the contrary, not only will he not suffer consequences, he'll accept a cushy job from Verizon once he leaves the FCC.

  24. They don't _have to be corrupt by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but it sure helps.

    This is the result of two decades of court packing with pro-corporate justices. This is also what happens when you let money hoarding go unchecked. When it gets to be more money than a person can spend it's not money anymore, it's power.

    We've let too much power accumulate into the hands of too few. We're going to start paying the price more and more often.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They don't _have to be corrupt by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      As someone who is probably older than you, I've observed that "packing the courts" is commonplace. It upsets us most when we see the packing as unfair or against the common interest, or even against law itself. It's certainly occurred throughout the history of judges and whatever selection process is used for them.

  25. Addendum 4 "a revolution of the MIND"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & I'm the LAST ONE calling for some 'violent revolution' but MORE of 1 of a "revolution of the mind" to set things RIGHT again (with RULES & PARAMETERS that are just/fair).

    APK

    P.S.=> Thought I'd STRESS that... apk

  26. Re:Subtext by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    > The law is the law

    If I may point out, that statement is an aphorism. It contains a general truth, but often breaks down very badly if applied badly. Judges generally have a great deal of authority to make a decision _within_ the law. Sentencing guidelines are set in the law as _ranges_. If the law did not require interpretation, there would be far, far fewer lawyers.

  27. Who knew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody, everybody knew.

  28. rsilvergun Mr. +4 "informative" goes silent? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & "CAT GOT YOUR TONGUE" vs. https://yro.slashdot.org/comme... & https://yro.slashdot.org/comme... (& YOU SAID I DO NOTHING TO FIX THINGS vs. THAT? Please - FAR MORE THAN YOU EVER WILL & everyday) as you FLAP your COCKSUCKER, hmmm?

    * Yes, RoTfLmAo... blowhard FAKE NAME chattering TWAT do-NOTHING you are.

    (Your BIG MOUTH wrote checks it can't CA$H twice vs. me)

    APK

    P.S.=> Especially on the 2nd link: Tell us - HOW DOES EATING YOUR WORDS taste? Bit like your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them back down your CHICKEN NECK chattering TWAT?? Bit like the BITTER taste of SELF-DEFEAT (per the 1st link where YOU ESTABLISHED THE CONTEXT I USED & yet you TRIED vainly to say "the context you used" lmao)... apk

  29. weasel worded by tomhath · · Score: 1

    "It has come to our attention that certain individuals at the FCC may have..."

    Qualified accusation in the passive voice. Sounds like even the Register thinks it's Fake News.

    1. Re:weasel worded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're an ignorant buffoon.

  30. Re: Subtext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise known morw simply as "lawyering."

    What's the difference between a lawyer and a catfish?

    One is a scum-sucking bottom-feeder, and the other is a fish.

    Not that there aren't sincerely good-intentioned lawyers out there... But there are plenty of despicable cunts out there.

  31. Re: More ISP choices seems like a good thing to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fail the government quiz. But you have great prospects as a telco shill, please apply immediately!

  32. Binary voting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad that's the wing of the Democrat Party that wants to make success illegal and tax jobs out of the country.

    That's the type of jingoistic simpleton thinking that is ruining our country.

    Here's what I do: I vote on a binary algorithm. There's Candidate A and B. Who most closely represent MY interests?

    I vote accordingly. Over the next few years, I watch and see again, who represents MY interests? Wait?! MY candidate didn't vote for MY interests! Then it's the other guy! MY candidate is FIRED!! (At least with my vote.)

    I live in a very RED area. My CongressFuckers have fucked us up the ass and mouth and ears and eyes so many times...but, they still get elected back into office because - the American Electorate treats their government like a fucking NFL team!!

  33. Corrupt local gov't complains about corruption. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The local governments are complaining about flat flees that prevent them from charging outrageous access fees to their utility poles.

    This is actually in the FCC's wheelhouse since they can do things like prevent apartment complexes from banning satellite dishes.

    However, Ajit Pai's stance on a lot of things is stupid, of course. ISPs need to be corralled/coerced into lower prices (or at least offering a cheap service tier that isn't crap).

    (If these local governments were smart, they'd sue on the basis that the FCC should only be able to set access fees for telecom services. It would force ISPs to be either "information services" or telecoms, not both.)

  34. EAT YOUR WORDS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "you're just an alt-right troll. You're not interested in solving problems or being right, just winning" - by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Saturday January 26, 2019 @12:19PM (#58025920)

    EAT YOUR WORDS & let's see YOU do better vs. (on fixing things) https://yro.slashdot.org/comme... ok, CHATTERING TWAT? I do MORE than YOU ever have OR EVER WILL chump behind your FAKENAME!

    You're EATING THOSE WORDS right now vs. what I put up in that link that I DO that really DOES FIX THINGS... how about you?

    ZERO - just blowhard HOT AIR from you!

    That's in ADDITION to MY use of the CONTEXT YOU YOURSELF ESTABLISHED & I shot you to pieces on it https://yro.slashdot.org/comme... as you OVERLOOKED the OBVIOUS from both ECONOMIC & POLITICAL HISTORY, fool!

    (Made me laugh you trying to DEFLECT from that FACT you BROUGHT UP the 50's & we knocked out a MAJOR manufactured goods competitor in GERMANY right after WWII which IS the 50's dumbo!).

    YOUR DEFEAT = EVIDENCED by the FACT you had to VAINLY TRY to EFFETELY "HIDE" THIS LAST TIME I POSTED IT here https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

    APK

    P.S.=> I do more in a SINGLE DAY on the front of FIXING things, for free for EVERYONE, than all your CHATTER will do in a LIFETIME of that wasted HOT blowhard AIR of yours chump... apk

    1. Re:EAT YOUR WORDS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S.=> I do more in a SINGLE DAY on the front of FIXING things, for free for EVERYONE, than all your CHATTER will do in a LIFETIME of that wasted HOT blowhard AIR of yours chump... apk

      As long as we can continue feeding you and "forcing" you to type (or cut and paste) these long diatribes and follow various threads, we win.

  35. You established the context I used... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "WWII doesn't really matter in this context." - by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Saturday January 26, 2019 @12:19PM (#58025920)

    See subject & WRONG - it matters: You said "it worked the 50's" & that's post WWII (USA minus competition on manufacturing fronts as I SAID (& yes, it's fact, GERMANY was a MAJOR COMPETITOR out of the way there)).

    * YOU YOURSELF ESTABLISHED "the context", STUPID - I merely followed it thru to its common-sense outcome!

    Laissez-Faire (essentially a 'free-hand' minus TONS of gov't interfernce) ECONOMIC & POLITICAL POLICIES in gov't. ESTABLISH the rest - unless you want to do what JFK did THREATENING TO NATIONALIZE U.S. STEEL UNLESS THEY ROLLED BACK THEIR USURIOUS PRICES (How long did JFK live after THAT?).

    YOUR DEFEAT = EVIDENCED by the FACT you had to VAINLY TRY to EFFETELY "HIDE" THIS LAST TIME I POSTED IT here https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

    APK

    P.S.=> You're not only an UNDER-EDUCATED fool on economics AND history but a DUMB FUCK that didn't even RECALL what YOU YOURSELF SAID, lol... apk

  36. Re: More ISP choices seems like a good thing to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice try, cable shill.

  37. Be GLAD I'm here: Why? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & results in https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... https://yro.slashdot.org/comme... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://linux.slashdot.org/com... https://news.slashdot.org/comm... https://apple.slashdot.org/com... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://search.slashdot.org/co... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... https://apple.slashdot.org/com... https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... https://it.slashdot.org/commen... https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...

    * That's only recently while I've been on Linux (July 2018) & 100's of times vs. MANY other botnets/malwares etc. in the past circa 2006-early 2018 while I was on Windows: CONCRETE VERIFIABLE UNDENIABLE REALITY (see those links as proof). ... & that's ONLY what /. reported on (there are FAR more)

    APK

    P.S.=> "It's working: Neville... it's working!" - "I AM LEGEND" + HOSTNAME USE IS DOWN IN MALWARE https://unit42.paloaltonetwork... (my ACT OF FAITH is JUSTIFIED by fact)... apk

  38. "His 100th career rushing touchdown"... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject, my own post I replied to & 1st 2 minutes of THIS to describe what I do (& MOST don't) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... per an ATHLETIC HERO of mine (one hell of a guy & an example to others).

    * :)

    (Ah, it's GOOD to be KING (the "Lord of hosts", sarcasm but fits here, perfectly!)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Want the WORLD to change, for the BETTER? CHANGE, good change, STARTS w/ YOU (the man in the mirror) & you should ALL be applying yourselves to Make a Wheel (as I have) per https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di... instead of being CHATTERING TWATS behind FAKE NAMES... apk

  39. Addendum/Musical theme accompaniment... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I wanna see change in the future - I'm gonna make the best of WHAT I HAVE (hosts files)" per Queensryche "Best I can" https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    * TRY IT YOURSELVES CHUMPS - it's NOT that easy (but worth it, especially RESULTS that work https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

    (Ah, it's GOOD to be KING (the "Lord of hosts", sarcasm but fits here, perfectly!)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Want the WORLD to change, for the BETTER? CHANGE, good change, STARTS w/ YOU (the man in the mirror) & you should ALL be applying yourselves to Make a Wheel (as I have) per https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di... instead of being CHATTERING TWATS behind FAKE NAMES... apk

  40. I'll let Queensryche speak for me again... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I wanna see change in the future - I'm gonna make the best of WHAT I HAVE (hosts files)" per Queensryche "Best I can" https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    * TRY IT YOURSELVES CHUMPS - it's NOT that easy (but worth it, especially RESULTS that work https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

    (Ah, it's GOOD to be KING (the "Lord of hosts", sarcasm but fits here, perfectly!)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Want the WORLD to change, for the BETTER? CHANGE, good change, STARTS w/ YOU (the man in the mirror) & you should ALL be applying yourselves to Make a Wheel (as I have) per https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di... instead of being CHATTERING TWATS behind FAKE NAMES... apk

  41. I see what YOU see as does Queensryche... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & this lyric from it: "Now I see the payoffs everywhere I look - who do you trust WHEN EVERYONE'S A CROOK?" - Queensryche "REVOLUTION CALLING" https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    * Is it ME, or is the world going slowly nuts?

    (I've made a point of asking my elders this & they say "it's the world the past few years now, not you" & I've been on this planet for over 1/2 a century++ & THOSE I ASK, A LOT LONGER... even younger folks than I feel this way too!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Seems a lot of things are crooked (& maybe it's always been that way to SOME extent BUT not like I see now + no, it's not that it's just "more exposed & faster now due to the internet" either)... apk

  42. Quote from it that applies to ME specifically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & "For a PRICE, I'll do about anything (except 'pull the trigger' - for that I NEED A PRETTY GOOD CAUSE)" here's mine https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

    * :)

    Take a GOOD read, drink in & DIGEST THAT - & TRY do the same...

    APK

    P.S.=> Want the WORLD to change, for the BETTER? CHANGE, good change, STARTS w/ YOU (the man in the mirror) & you should ALL be applying yourselves to Make a Wheel (as I have) per https://isc.sans.edu/forums/di... instead of being CHATTERING TWATS behind FAKE NAMES... apk

  43. Retarded bitch APK is mad his ass gets beat daily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry retarded bitch Alexander Peter Kowalski, you are just a loser who is too dumb to realize you got stomped long ago.
    Here is a chronicle of your bitch ass getting beaten on your port filtering statements.
    Here is another one where your got beaten hard because you can't back up anything you say. This was about how you claim your shitware can block all hosts in a domain, which it can't.
    Then there is your claim that the Chinese copied you but you admit that at best all you have is wild ass speculation and can't offer any real proof or even actual evidence to support yourself.
    How about the list of experts you claim support your statements, none of which actually support your work and have been shown to actually be saying things different from what you stated they were.
    Maybe instead you can tell us about your "success" where a project rejected your stupid simplistic idea or maybe threaten to sue someone again because you are a insecure little man who is washed up and never amounted to anything.
    Better yet you can prove how defective you are by continuing to repeat your debunked BS some more.
    Why don't you get your pretend friend to post some fake support and then throw a fit when you get caught.

  44. Huawei? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    So, Ajit Pai has made a huge deal out of supporting deregulation of broadband in America. In fact, the FCC has been trying very hard to define 5G as a legitimate replacement for fiber (it could in theory work). And the American government has spent years attacking Huawei, even far past the point of rationally.

    Who in the White House has interests related to 5G infrastructure? I doubt itâ€(TM) Trump is involved, not unless they are helping him get the wall, though it could be. What about his cabinet?

    While I trust Huawei only a smidgen more than I trust Cisco (and Cisco feeds my family, but they are my creepy/dirty uncle), this is screaming conspiracy now. Someone who can influence the Whitehouse stands to profit hugely from keeping Huawei out of the 5G roll out. At least it really seems that way.

    It would also explain almost everything Ajit Pai has done since coming to power.

    What do you people think?

    1. Re:Huawei? by Required+Snark · · Score: 1

      Does it make any difference who the corrupt actor is in this case? Perhaps a company beholding to the Chinese state is worse then a corrupt US company in cahoots with the government/industrial complex, but you are screwed either way. Put another way, you could get hit by a speeding truck on the sidewalk or be shot by a stay bullet in your living room. Either way you're dead meat.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
  45. You lose vs. verifiable FACTS... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.) My program stops portfilter errs in hosts https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    2.) CHINA did hardcodes LONG AFTER I DID "Time is on MY SIDE" (Rolling Stones) lol, period.

    3.) Wildcards CREATE FALSE POSITIVES (try wildcard myftp.org, not all sites in it = bad). Hosts specifics don't cause that.

    4.) I never had to sue Thor SCHMUCK - CA rescinded their FALSE POSITIVE error, sold off their shitty antivirus & I said I'd speak to an attorney & I did who advised I go thru their removal process & I won.

    5.) /. users state the value of hosts for getting users more speed/security/reliability/anonymity listed here (enumerated as "Registered /.ers reviews") https://it.slashdot.org/commen...

    6.) Security pros galore + /.ers praise the layered security efficacy of hosts quoted here https://it.slashdot.org/commen...

    APK

    P.S.=> You can't even STAND BEHIND YOUR WORDS (lies) you UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous STALKER of me... apk

  46. We get it retarded bitch APK you are a loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get it, retarded bitch Alexander Peter Kowalski has nothing and can only keep repeating his debunked BS. He is even too dumb to understand that he shows everyone that he is a loser when he keeps repeating himself because he has nothing.

    1. Re:We get it retarded bitch APK you are a loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a retard stalking apk all over slashdot using unidentifiable anonymous posts since you fear him. Nobody believes you.

  47. It is retarded bitch APK's pretend friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look it is retarded bitch Alexander Peter Kowalski's pretend friend to try and make it looks like someone supports him. If you actually aren't APK then you are an even bigger retard than he isn't even defending himself because he knows that every criticism of him is true. Although it might be his roommate that lives with him in the $1 house so he can afford to eat and pay the utilities each month

    1. Re:It is retarded bitch APK's pretend friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how apk nuked you here today then so easily proving why you hide from him by unidentifiable anon https://science.slashdot.org/c...

  48. We get it APK is a retarded bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get it Alexander Peter Kowalski is a retarded bitch who need fake support for himself and hide. He has nothing and can't backup his bullshit statements so he just keeps repeating them. They were all debunked originally yet he still chooses to keep repeating them thus proving how defective he is. Then like the retard he is he pretends that someone supports him. If the support isn't him then the person supporting him is an even bigger retard than he is.

    1. Re:We get it APK is a retarded bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are delusional as well as a stalker of APK. He dismantled each of your lies with verifiable facts here https://science.slashdot.org/c... and you are helpless against facts.