Slashdot Mirror
Netflix, Amazon, and Hollywood Studios Shut Down Dragon Box (arstechnica.com)
The entertainment industry has shut down Dragon Media Inc.'s "Dragon Box" device, which connects to TVs and lets users watch video without a cable TV or streaming service subscription. According to Ars Technica, the company has "agreed to shut down the Dragon Box services and pay $14.5 million in damages to plaintiffs from the entertainment industry." From the report: Dragon Media was sued in January 2018 by Netflix, Amazon, Columbia Pictures, Disney, Paramount Pictures, Twentieth Century Fox, Universal, and Warner Bros. Dragon Media's lawyer initially predicted that the lawsuit would backfire on the entertainment industry, but the Dragon Box maker must have decided it had little chance of winning at trial. The plaintiffs and defendant filed a proposed settlement Monday at U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
The settlement requires Dragon Media to "cease all operation of the Dragon Box system" and related services within five days. Under the settlement, "[j]udgment shall be entered against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs' claims of copyright infringement, and damages shall be awarded to Plaintiffs in the amount of U.S. $14,500,000," the document says. Dragon Media, Dragon Media owner Paul Christoforo, and reseller Jeff Williams "[s]hall be further enjoined from operating any website, system, software, or service that is substantially similar to the Dragon Box service," the settlement says. The settlement also prohibits the defendants from making its source code or other technology available to others.
The settlement requires Dragon Media to "cease all operation of the Dragon Box system" and related services within five days. Under the settlement, "[j]udgment shall be entered against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs' claims of copyright infringement, and damages shall be awarded to Plaintiffs in the amount of U.S. $14,500,000," the document says. Dragon Media, Dragon Media owner Paul Christoforo, and reseller Jeff Williams "[s]hall be further enjoined from operating any website, system, software, or service that is substantially similar to the Dragon Box service," the settlement says. The settlement also prohibits the defendants from making its source code or other technology available to others.
Was this just another box that streams torrents off the net and pretends that it was legal?
I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
Dragon Media's lawyer initially predicted that the lawsuit would backfire on the entertainment industry, but the Dragon Box maker must have decided it had little chance of winning at trial.
"Hmmmm," thought the lawyer. "If we sue, people will get mad at us, and pirate more, leading to a bigger settlement from Dragon Box."
Who at DB thought this strategy might work?
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
Designed by Bruce Lee before his death, and kept in a secret vault since, Dragon Box was capable of turning Hollywood films with American actors into Chinese films with Chinese actors. Its a shame they shut it down. Rumors are that Ghandi, before his death, also designed a similar box. This one turns Hollywood movies into Bollywood action movies as you watch them. Look what the box does to a typical Woody Allen film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
The heads of the RIAA/MPAA should be sealed in prison.
Corporatism != Free Market
Just like a plumber gets $1 every time a toilet he installed gets flushed and electricians get 10 cents every time a circuit they installed is used. What? No? Weird. Some people have to continue to work to get paid? Unreal.
This is similar to Kodi, and how they tried to shut Kodi boxes down. Like a hydra this will multiply.
I mark the "watch anything for free" boxes on my local CL as prohibited :p
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Every PC that has been connected to a TV has let the users watch video without a cable TV or streaming service subscription.
Your summary sucks slashdot.
Just like a plumber gets $1 every time a toilet he installed gets flushed and electricians get 10 cents every time a circuit they installed is used. What? No? Weird. Some people have to continue to work to get paid? Unreal.
I wonder if after you retire you would be happy if your 401k went to $0 and/or your pension vanished. Because that is what would happen in a world where previous investment was worthless and continued work was the only way to make income.
-- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
It's the very definition of pay-per-view. And if you don't think pay-per-view applies to physical media like Bluray as well then you're kidding yourself - studios can blacklist keys for a given disc at any time of their choosing. It never was your property.
Of course the disc is your property, it's just the data on it is not and you have no intrinsic right to decrypt it outside of approved software.
That your rights to the content are limited isn't really the point. It's still not pay per view because that implies it's metered or somehow linked to the number of plays.
Is this the same rampaging jackass Paul Christoforo of the PAX twitter from 2012??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://www.engadget.com/2011/...
Why? Because it's exactly correct, and completely defeats the argument posed by the mafia shill?
Because artists can't put money in a 401K?
Play Command HQ online
Your analogy sucks balls. Hopefully you knew that because if not you are one dumb fuck.
It's the very definition of pay-per-view. And if you don't think pay-per-view applies to physical media like Bluray as well then you're kidding yourself - studios can blacklist keys for a given disc at any time of their choosing. It never was your property.
Studios can blacklist all they want - my blu-ray player is not Internet connected, so such blacklists will never be updated. I can see my movies till the physical media wears out.
Not if they're not getting paid because nobody is making movies other than amateur ones any more as the levels of piracy get to the point it isn't worth it.
I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
Because artists can't put money in a 401K?
You missed the point. The OP was implying that movie studios and other investors in movies shouldn't get royalties and other ongoing payments because they aren't performing any actual work after the movie is created. This is essentially the same as saying you shouldn't get dividends from stock you own because you aren't performing any actual work.
So if this is how the world worked, the artist could put money in a 401k but it wouldn't matter because capital is worthless. Only labor would be worth anything. I know it is ridiculous, just like thinking movie studios should get paid royalties on existing work.
-- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
Your analogy sucks balls. Hopefully you knew that because if not you are one dumb fuck.
The OP implied movie investors should not get paid royalties because they aren't doing any actual work after the movie is produced.
I compared that to the dividends and other returns you would get from your 401k, in which the 401k investment is analogous to the investment of producing a movie.
How exactly does the analogy fall apart? If you don't think movie producers should continue to make money on their investment for years/decades after their initial investment, why should a 401k investor?
-- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
No, because it implies all investment is worthless and only labor is worth anything. It really is a horrible analogy. In such a world capital would be worth next to nothing.
-- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
Check out Locast.org
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/0...
They have an app for streaming local TV. Claim it's legal since they are a nonprofit and don't allow transmission beyond the local broadcast area.
Should be interesting to watch.
I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
Not the original AC, but here's how your analogy falls apart:
The 401k holder is in fact a part owner (stockholder) of the companies in his portfolio. Those companies ARE in fact producing a good or service. The companies are receiving revenue in furtherance of running that business. The only case where this would fall apart is for patent trolls, or other IP hoarders that produce nothing other than lawsuits protecting their IP. Your analogy is no different than saying a plumber is not entitled to his bill remittances for work performed just because he sent his apprentice to solder the pipe.
Those little things called dividends are the profits earned by the companies in the due course of business. Capital gains/losses on sales of shares are in itself a type of business no different than if you bought a house and sold it later at a profit (or loss) because the street value changed during the period you owned it.