Slashdot Mirror


Google Now Pays More Money in EU Fines Than it Pays in Taxes (computing.co.uk)

An anonymous reader writes: Google owner Alphabet has reported annual and quarterly revenues up again, largely on the back of increasing market share in online advertising. The company reported fourth quarter revenues up 22 per cent to $39.28 billion, while annual revenues were up 23 per cent to $136.8 billion. And the company also took the time to separate out "European Commission fines" in its consolidated statements of income in the company's accounts. These increased from $2.7 billion in 2017 to $5.1 billion in 2018, with a further 50 million euro already set to be added to the bill for its first quarter and 2019 accounts, thanks to French data protection authority CNIL.That fine compares to a provision for income taxes of just $4.2 billion for 2018, or 12 per cent of its pre-tax income.

Net income for the full year increased by a 143 per cent from $12.67 billion to $30.74 billion thanks largely to a radically lower provision for income taxes - down from $14.5 billion to just $4.2 billion. The company attributed this tax boost down to the US Tax Act of 2017, which had depressed net income in 2017. This had "resulted in additional tax expense of $9.9 billion in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to the one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign subsidiary earnings and deferred tax effects", the company claimed in its earnings release.

109 comments

  1. article is not very complete by TomR+teh+Pirate · · Score: 2

    From the article, one cannot tell what the fines are attributable to. For example, if the fines are in fact a form of back-pay on some of the taxes, then the comparison doesn't really make much sense. Google is presumably run by rational people who are working to optimize their bottom line.

    1. Re:article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      GDPR violations mostly. Google didn't specify in their listing either, they just said "EU com fines" and put up a total. They don't want people to remember they were for violations of EU privacy laws right at frontal lobe level.

    2. Re:article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google has paid fines for supporting free speech, Google has paid fines for being the market leader, Google has paid fines for abusing personal information and Google has paid fines for being an American mega-corporation. They've probably paid fines for bribing politicians, and they've certainly paid fines for failing to bribe politicians. But, fundamentally, fines against foreign companies are a great way to get money and domestic votes.

    3. Re: article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, is there a European company that is used for search in Europe more than Google? Certainly you could argue that Google is not a market leader in China, but Europe? Give me a break.

    4. Re:article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google paid fines for not bring in compliance with the law in a region from which they operate.

    5. Re:article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. The fines are primarily anti-trust. Like say this one:

      https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/18/17580694/google-android-eu-fine-antitrust

    6. Re:article is not very complete by swillden · · Score: 3, Informative

      GDPR violations mostly.

      I think very little was GDPR-related. As I recall, 2017's big fine ($2.5B) was for putting Google Shopping ads in Google Search results, and 2018's ($5B) was for bundling GApps with Android.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:article is not very complete by Computershack · · Score: 2

      EU doing what the US Government should have done.

      --
      I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
    8. Re: article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europeans pretty much missed on the whole internet phenomenon. They probably thought it to be a fad. Or simply they're not as smart as they like to think.

    9. Re:article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the company also took the time to separate out "European Commission fines" in its consolidated statements of income in the company's accounts. These increased from $2.7 billion in 2017 to $5.1 billion in 2018, with a further €50 million already set to be added to the bill for its first quarter and 2019 accounts, thanks to French data protection authority CNIL.

      That fine compares to a provision for income taxes of just $4.2 billion for 2018, or 12 per cent of its pre-tax income.

      Yes, it's not made clear how much of the $5.1 billion is for breaches of laws concerning, for example, data protection, and how much is for financial misdeeds.

      However, if I've understood what's been going on with the tax shenanigans, the fines mentioned in the article are not likely to be for financial misdeeds...

      The article mentions that these are "European Commission fines"; i.e. fines imposed by the European Commission.

      The tax shenanigans were tax advantages granted by national governments to big businesses, that the Commission later judged to be contrary to EU fair competition laws. The commission cannot impose fines or charges against these national governments, nor against the businesses in question, but it can require that these national governments recover the unlawfully avoided taxes from the businesses.

      For an example of Ireland and Apple, see:
      http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-2923_en.htm

    10. Re:article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could simply stop doing business with the EU - then no fines.
      Apparently, they think it's still worth it.
      The hard part would be firing the existing customers.

    11. Re: article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is an american company, so it must defended at all costs for the good of our flag and our nation, no matter how shitty it is. USA, USA!

    12. Re:article is not very complete by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      GDPR violations mostly.

      Nope. Google has had one GDPR fine and that isn't paid yet. They have been antitrust fines.

    13. Re:article is not very complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still hoping for microsoft to block chrome from running and block access to google properties from their OS..

    14. Re: article is not very complete by illiac_1962 · · Score: 1

      Fines are always cheaper than compliance.

  2. Do no evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ho ho.

    1. Re: Do no evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling for your mom?

  3. Alphabet Pays Taxes? by medv4380 · · Score: 1

    Are their accountants doing their job? Clearly their lawyers need more practice, or is that the Bag Men who've dropped the ball?

    1. Re:Alphabet Pays Taxes? by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      The lawyers promised everything was legal, even though they weren't doing any of it the way that the governments involved had written the regulations, and then later the governments had their own lawyers look at it, and those lawyers pointed out it was never legal, and they'd know if it was legal because google would be following the regulations as written.

      Loopholes are something that doesn't exist, that your lawyer promises will continue to not exist. The government might look the other way, but they also might just throw the book at you. Does google have the institutional intelligence to observe their results, and alter their formula?

      Time will tell! I'm guessing not, and they're going to pay a lot more than this in the future.

  4. Re:Yup. by Freischutz · · Score: 2

    It was obvious that Europe can not use their tax laws to go after Google (and other American tech companies), so, they were going to use their laws with MASSIVE fines. I had to laugh when somebody gripped about America fining VW 2.8B for their lying and polluting, while Europe will make up fake fines which are much higher against these companies and use it on their coffers.

    Yeah, because American mega-corps are such a nice honest salt-of-the-earth bunch people who never cheat on their taxes. I'm pretty sure the people running US corporations are the exact same species of greedy sociopathic assholes as their European colleagues. I for one despise them all equally.

  5. Windbourne is the world's dumbest faggot now? Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've concluded Europe doesn't have the right to their own privacy laws. You're the world's dumbest faggot for the moment. Amazing, congratulations.

  6. Amazing, congratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windbourne, world's dumbest faggot everybody. A round of applause, the moron thinks Europe can't have their own laws. He's that dumb.

  7. EU fines ARE taxes. by Chas · · Score: 0, Troll

    They're "You're making too much, we're going to invent a reason you're bad, and retroactively fine you to fund our pork projects!" taxes.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:EU fines ARE taxes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that policy the norm in those small, US towns with their traffic speed traps and such? Like in the Soviet Russia with vodka and jeans at random traffic stops.

    2. Re:EU fines ARE taxes. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's a lot easier to take if from someone else than to work for it

    3. Re:EU fines ARE taxes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they dont invent a reason you are bad, they dont need to, theres THOUSANDS of laws, they put the same kind of fines and sanctions to regular people, well actually is worse since the minimum fine to some random dude with an online bussiness is bigger than whatever fines google is getting

      you would know if you were european and had an online bussiness, everything data related IS a nightmare, but you are just talking with your ass

  8. Round of applause for the dumbass, everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windbourne, world's dumbest faggot everybody. A round of applause, the moron thinks Europe can't have their own laws. He's that dumb.

  9. This is BS, but, we really need to fix taxes by WindBourne · · Score: 0

    EU is pulling a fast one to get their coffers full by raiding American companies. They have no intention of raiding their own companies. BUT, the real issue is that there are so many tax loopholes all over the world, combined with brick/mortar vs internet vs service. Western nations are having difficulty. What is needed is for the western nations to get together, perhaps at G12, and discuss how to deal with taxation of companies.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:This is BS, but, we really need to fix taxes by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is easy. All taxes should be paid at point of revenue and all cost deductions should be proven and the associated profits with those deductions even offshore ones, should be taxed. So no matter where the cost goes, the profits associated with it are taxed as if they occured locally at the point of revenue, no profit shifting should be allowed. Not able to prove the cost and profit in a different country, pay tax on total revenue and tough luck on the loss.

      All taxes should be paid at point of revenue, the location where the customer spent their money.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:This is BS, but, we really need to fix taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're really not.

      The EU really can't be blamed whatsoever if Google keeps persistently breaking the law, the EU merely enforces it.

      What's more, it's often not even the EU that triggers these actions that lead to these fines, typically the EU only acts when it receives a complaint about some company breaking the law, and in fact, in the cases of the fines listed here two of them at least are due to anti-competitive actions, and the complaints were actually raised by US companies.

      So at least two of these fines, making up the bulk of the costs are the result of Google being found to be breaking competition law due to complaints from other US companies.

      The real problem is that America's competition laws are insufficient, so these problems don't get nipped in the bud in the US like they really should. There's a reason America ends up with things like the Microsoft anti-trust trial, concepts like "too big to fail", and so on and so forth.

      Really, the EU should be applauded for:

      a) Ensuring healthy competition

      b) Responding effectively to complaints by competitors damaged by unhealthy competition

      c) Not having a bunch of corrupt senators et. al. that can be paid off to bury investigations

      If the US wasn't the land of monopoly abuse and corruption that is then none of these things would even be an issue. The US bitches and moans about how the rest of the world should accept the free market, but you can't have a healthy free market without competition. If the US wants the rest of the world to accept the free market that's fine, but you can't expect them to import US corruption and anti-competitiveness because that just makes the whole adopt the free market thing a complete contradiction. The EU has accepted your free market ideology, and it's making sure it works, be happy with that; don't expect it to bring across the corruption in your political system that makes a mockery of the free market as well as that's a step too far and completely contradicts the free market you wanted the EU to follow in the first place.

    3. Re:This is BS, but, we really need to fix taxes by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      This is a joke, right?
      "All taxes should be paid at point of revenue"
      Okay - so I buy a chocolate - and pay tax where I buy it. Yep checks out.
      Okay - so I buy a song - and pay tax at my house. Yep checks out.
      Okay - so I travel to the EU and buy a song and pay tax in the EU. Pay tax in the EU from my US phone transaction from a US company... Uh...
      Okay - so I am referred to a Japanese site from a US company from my French search. The Japanese site paid a UK company for the referral. The French search was from a different US company, which outsources referral technology to the UK. I did not make a purchase. Who pays what tax now?

    4. Re:This is BS, but, we really need to fix taxes by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      U would think so.
      I continue to suggest that we should have the Delivery service pick up a sales tax on shipped goods.
      Of course, you then run into services. I can see companies simply shifting their services to other nations to avoid having to pay taxes, but it strikes me as bizarre that the west is NOT working together to prevent all of this.

      I get why EU is doing the massive penalties on American companies. Basically, it is their current approach to get the taxes they believe owed. BUT, until we stop the tax havens that are designed purposely to hide taxes (such as Ireland, Luxembourg (funny considering they are the seat of EU), Switzerland, Netherlands, Puerto Rico, etc) then little will change.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re: This is BS, but, we really need to fix taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You continue to suggest idiotic ideas. McDonald's delivers it's own things so collects it's own tax... yea no way to cheat that is there...

  10. Re:The EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huxley, when you're feeling retarded and chatty at the same time, which is most of the time, try this instead : Open the oven, turn it on. Let the fumes come for a full minute, all up into your worthless child's brain. Then stay there. Trust me.

    It will be at least as productive as what you're doing now, you fucking idiot. Die in a fire. Take Windbourne with you. The world doesn't need you morons. Nobody does. You're too stupid to continue existing, I'm very sorry. Godspeed. Die.

  11. Tax Breaks to Europe by sdinfoserv · · Score: 3, Informative

    So as the US Federal Government goes deeper into debt to fund Corporate Tax Breaks, the EU gladly hands down fines to collect the dollars those same companies are NOT paying in infrastructure reinvestment, average worker wages and benefits.
    What part of Reaganomics "trickledown" lead to raising taxes on the middle class 11 times in Reagan's 8 years are lost on people. Stop buying the "trickledown" lies.

    1. Re:Tax Breaks to Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the US economy doing pretty well? The EU's has stalled lately. On top of that, we in the EU are world "leaders" when it comes to the tax burden of workers. EU governments just love spending other people's money.

      Not sure if you've noticed but in Germany for example our infrastructure isn't doing too well, especially railways. Oh and of course benefits are going down because the social and healthcare systems aren't the healthiest either. Google isn't to blame for all that.

      The grass isn't always greener on the other side and all that.

    2. Re:Tax Breaks to Europe by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

      "Fund" a tax break? How does one "fund" a tax break? The government's failure to collect a percentage of money (via legal coercion) earned by an entity creating something of value is not "funding." I'm not saying that taxation is wrong per se, but to have an honest discussion about taxes and corporatism, we need to acknowledge that the government cannot "fund" a tax break. In the meantime, the EU with its non-representative, unelected, bureaucratic governance is not something to hold up as an example, especially if you're suggesting the US has anything to learn from that.

    3. Re:Tax Breaks to Europe by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      Business without guidance and regulations is left to the whims of the sociopaths who run them. Many CEO's of large corporations are successful because they are sociopaths, they have no regard for those hurt by their decisions. . (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/13/1-in-5-ceos-are-psychopaths-australian-study-finds/)
      We have laws because corporations place profit over life and safety. We as a society have agreed that educating the masses is a better option than dealing with uneducated hoodlum hordes running amok. Transportation infrastructure benefits both people and corporations to move goods and services.
      Roads, schools, law enforcement all cost money - as did the continental army that fought for, and won, US independence. Funding these things require taxes, which was recognized and passed by our founding fathers. "Taxes shouldn't exist" is socially and historically wrong. If you don't like it, move to a county with zero services including protection and see just exactly how long you keep that attitude.

  12. Windbourne, world's dumbest faggot everybody. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windbourne, world's dumbest faggot everybody. A round of applause, the moron thinks Europe can't have their own laws. He's that dumb.

  13. Follow the law or whine louder GOP INCEL faggots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    ANOTHER contender for world's dumbest faggot everybody! Another round of applause, another inbred moron thinks Europe can't have their own privacy laws. You can't make this stuff up, Republicans literally are this retarded now.

    They think they make the rules in Europe too, lol. Pity the inbred morons, they don't understand why they can't be kings and instead are worthless uneducated pawns.

  14. Re: The EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US government has made it very clear that American jobs are not going to be protected. We've lost our ability to scale our industrial base and are being eaten out from the insides by parasitic kleptocrats.

    Trump is right that we're being invaded by foreigners. But it's not the lowly farm hands from Latin America. It's European-Russian-Chinese-Korean industrist. Sadly all the sorts of people Trump loves to hobknob with.

  15. Re:Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...America is controlled by a Putin Puppet...

    Stopped reading right there.
    Take your slanderous assertions without evidence nor citations and shove 'em into /dev/null

  16. Re:The EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aww, you poor little baby. Are you butt-hurt for ahuxley making a spot-on comment about the communists in the EU? Apparently so since you are communist yourself. Soon the welfare programs will cease and you will either have to find a job or starve to death.

  17. "Europe" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You subtly acknowledge that the European countries are no longer sovereign states, but puppets of Brussels.

  18. Republicans - can they read at all, or not at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Isn't the US economy doing pretty well?" If Trump turning 8 years of growth into a recession is "pretty well" then sure. Shutting down the gov, trade wars, highest trade imbalance ever, corporate tax cut did nothing... great job.

    Are you illiterate or just financially so?

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/most-cfos-see-a-u-s-recession-coming-by-2020/
    https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/05/us-headed-for-recession-in-2019-as-fed-raises-rates-economist-warns.html
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/raulelizalde/2018/12/17/another-warning-that-a-2019-recession-is-coming/
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/12/20/feature/a-recession-is-coming-trump-is-going-to-make-the-recovery-worse/
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/housing-market-recession-coming-224827298.html

  19. Re:Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, actually the problem for Trump is there IS tons of evidence he's Putin's puppet, and his weak faggoty lies in denial didn't help. He's caught, hanged.

  20. Re:Yup. by Freischutz · · Score: 1

    they are NOT being fined for taxes. They are being fined for all sorts of BS that their own companies do, but it is not illegal....

    Such as? ... please enlighten us by elaborating and providing some citations to weasel stuff that European Corpocrats do but American ones would never dream of doing because they are such honest salt-of-the-earth people.

  21. Google, could you please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google, just move the fuck out of the EU. Move all operations because it seems like the EU just has a hard-on for Google.

  22. i think the USA by FudRucker · · Score: 0

    should block all foreign internet, ALL OF IT, and let the rest of the world wonder what happened to the internet for a few weeks, and watch what they say and do, i am sure it will have a dramatic effect since the biggest root servers that make all the domain names are located in the USA

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:i think the USA by jemmyw · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what effect you're after, but if you believe that will make the rest of the world go "oh gosh, we better not piss off amercian corporations again" I think you might be disappointed. If the desire is to keep control for as long as possible then not giving the world a good reason to build their own infrastructure is probably the best course.

      It would also seriously impact the business of those mega corps. Again, not sure what your goal is, but its probably not beneficial to the american economy as a whole... and outside short term pain, probably long term gain.

    2. Re:i think the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are so dumb you should be in government with Trump.
      Here is what will happen.
      The rest of the world will realise relying on the USA is a BAD thing, so they will build competing services. They will also try to limit their financial exposure to the whims of the USA and will choose to build stronger relationships with a wider base.
      Then there is the 2.5 Trillion in exports that is put at risk, how many jobs would be gone if that gets even a 5% drop ?

      Over 80% of the worlds economy does not involve the USA.

      Personally I am all for it, the US is less a friend than a bully.
      Start your trade wars, you will loose.
      Build your walls, they keep people in just as effectively as out (Canada may want to consider this too)
      Piss everyone off, they will let you keep your ball, but then they will play elsewhere.
      The USA has far more to loose than to gain.

    3. Re:i think the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're a capitalist and globalist. Good to know. You care about money and the economy and keeping the rich in power.

      Check your head.

    4. Re:i think the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm most servers are NOT hosted in the US and the root servers only matter for new domains, of which other countries are the smallest users of the US based ones. While it would be inconvenient for some (mostly americans) I think the rest of the world would happily survive.

  23. Re:Republicans - can they read at all, or not at a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bunch of journalists see a recession coming, eventually, maybe, in a couple of years. Right. Is that as reliable as the "magic wand" they said was needed to grow the economy when Trump got elected?

  24. Fuck Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Google, and fuck the lack of competition in general. There are too few companies to compete against Google, and it seems to be reasonless. There aren't enough attempts to even try. They've really done nothing magical, nothing special. Their claim to fame is Android, which is based on Linux. And Chrome is for suckers who don't mind sharing their personal information.

  25. Re:Republicans - can they read at all, or not at a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Economists and CFOs, if you learn to read. Experts. Not idiots like yourself. The journalists tabulated the data and statements. You're too dumb for this topic perhaps, like Donald.

  26. Round of applause for the dumbass, everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windbourne, world's dumbest faggot everybody. A round of applause, the moron thinks Europe can't have their own laws. He's that dumb.

  27. Re:Follow the law or whine louder GOP INCEL faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know you are trolling, but do you really think the potential for generating revenue due to violations of these privacy laws wasn't a driving factor behind the politicians who put those privacy laws into place, or do you really think they were looking out for the little guy?

  28. Re:Follow the law or whine louder GOP INCEL faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it's not provable unless you delve, and you're not doing that. However it's also irrelevant because they have the right to have laws! Google plays in their country's sandbox, not the other way around. Google != Sovereign.

    If they were really not wanting to pay the fines they'd ADDRESS THE VIOLATIONS OF LAW, which wouldn't be impossible and everyone else has to do it also, OR STOP OPERATING IN EUROPE. Them's the breaks kid.

    They choose to pay. They make massive profits anyway. Now if they only fix their models to protect user privacy over their multifaceted interconnected empire of data collection "for advertising" -wink, THEY WOULD BE ALL SET.

    Stop apologizing for a massive profit just because a country wanted to enforce their laws SLIGHTLY in the process. It's retarded. And no, I'm 100% not trolling.

    That idiot windbourne literally seems to think EU can't have different laws than the US, or what Google would prefer. Fuck him back to a Lego movie, he's an idiot. Completely not trolling, 100% serious.

    Capiche?

  29. Re:Follow the law or whine louder GOP INCEL faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I said country, I meant EU commission, same concepts apply. Sovereign lawmakers are allowed to enforce their standards, and frankly the GDPR is not unreasonable, it's very much the future world standard and current gold standard.

  30. What else would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When big corporations like Google refuse to pay their fair share in taxes and funnel money into shell corporations so they can claim losses to evade taxes, there's only so much you can do to make them pay up. I don't exactly agree with every fine the EU has imposed but it is clearly an effective way to make them pay their part. I only hope the U.S. smartens up and follows suite.

    1. Re:What else would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded?

      This is an example of how fines don't work. Fines are supposed to punish and discourage bad behaviour entirely. It's supposed to bury corporations that fuck up in fines that RUIN them. Instead, these fines are providing a way for wealthy multinationals to do whatever they want, so long as they have enough money to pay the fine, they can always have an advantage over their smaller competitors who have no choice but to behave themselves if they want to survive.

      Putting corporate executives in a federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison would actually affect some goddamn change. Three strikes. First two result in a fine, third strike results in biting the pillow while Bubba goes in dry.

  31. its pretty messed up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is something seriously wrong in how these multinational powerhouses are taxed if its cheeper to pay fines than paying tax...

    Im sure some are crying they should not be taxed but the fact is they are making containerships full of cash from us and should pay tax not just dividends to a select few!

  32. The fines aren't very much by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    not compared to the profits let alone the cost of running a government and associated services. If google can get out of paying taxes for fines they're way, way ahead.

    You're dead right about trickle down economics. Here in the states we changed the name to "Job Creators" and that stuck. Never underestimate the power of think tanks & focus groups.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  33. Re:Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I do not blame ANY of these companies for there actions"

    So, do you blame them for here actions, instead?

  34. Still making a lot of profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Otherwise they would have changed to conform with the law.

  35. Re:Yup. by Computershack · · Score: 3, Informative

    they are NOT being fined for taxes. They are being fined for all sorts of BS that their own companies do, but it is not illegal.

    Yeah actually in the EU it is illegal which is why they got fined.

    --
    I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
  36. Re:CUT THEM OFF by Computershack · · Score: 2

    Imagine if all of Europe suddenly was cut off from Google Services, Gmail, Maps, and the Play Store. I'm tired of foreign countries attempting to hurt American companies.

    Are you aware that there is actually a movement in the US that people sign up to to remove Google from their online lives? If Europe was cut off from Google Services they'd just use one of the plethora of alternatives. Remember the only reason you have the WWW and that Google exists at all is thanks to the British creator of HTML and the European foundation CERN.

    --
    I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
  37. Hey! Look at me! I'm an edgeboi! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Sorry. Did you have anything cogent to say?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  38. Re:Follow the law or whine louder GOP INCEL faggot by Chas · · Score: 0

    Tell that to the guys in the EU trying to regulate the length of candle wicks.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  39. they could pay zero in fines by houghi · · Score: 1

    Not paying any in fines is very easy. As well is it easier to pay the morally correct amount of taxes.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  40. Re:Follow the law or whine louder GOP INCEL faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me a name and I will.

  41. Re:CUT THEM OFF by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    Remember the only reason you have the WWW and that Google exists at all is thanks to the British creator of HTML and the European foundation CERN.

    Do you really think nobody else would've figured out how to transmit formatted text over the internet?

    That's like saying aliens wouldn't have rockets because Wernher von Braun lived on Earth.

  42. Re:Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 90s, everybody was investing in Russia, even McDonald's had a huge restaurant built in Moscow. Learn some history - anyone who was an investor of any kind saw it as a new market like how China and India had runs a few years later. Trump isn't the problem, he's actually trying to fix the offshoring and the current bear market in China is hurting the investments of some powerful people. The problem is that not just the jobs left, but the factories and skills as well. A nearly complete restart of industry is required. It'll be expensive, but that's why a one-time repatriation of funds is allowed at a low tax rate.

  43. Re:Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Case in point, how many machinists do you know? Those are the toolmakers. It's a skilled craft that can be aided by robotics, but not entirely replaced by them.

  44. Re:CUT THEM OFF by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    If Google pulled out of the EU then the shareholders would revolt and the greatest corporate shitstorm ever known would ensue. The EU market is vast and highly profitable. Quitting is just leaving huge sums of money on the table.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  45. that's not saying much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's not saying much since they nearly pay no taxes at all.

  46. Re:Yup. by Freischutz · · Score: 2

    ..They are being fined for all sorts of BS that their own companies do, but it is not illegal....

    What are you talking about? I said that BOTH Americans and European companies are doing this stuff, it is just that the European govs are going after the American companies.

    You suggested that the EU is unfairly fining US companies and not fining European ones for getting up to the exact same shenannigans the US companies are pulling, or, in other words the usual: Bwwwaaaaaaaahhhhhh. UNFAIR!!! ... whining that seems to be so in vogue with US conservatives these days.

    Here are some companies that have been fined by the EU for all kinds of dirty tricks over the last few decades:

    Daimler (German)
    Scania (Swedish)
    DAF (Dutch)
    Saint Gobain (French)
    Philips (Dutch)
    LG Electronics (South Korean)
    Volvo/Renault (Swedish/French)
    Iveco (Italian)
    Deutsche Bank (German)
    F. Hoffmann-La Roche (Swiss)

    The list is much, much longer and it consists of many European and Asian companies. The EU is not singling out US companies for 'unfair' treatment, it's more that US companies get away with murder in the US, with the help of US politicians to screw the US public, and they think they can get away with it everywhere else too. Well think again.

  47. Re:Yup. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Yeah actually in the EU it is illegal which is why they got fined.

    Well it's illegal in the USA as well. However the prosecutors don't go after companies for antitrust laws without actual proven dollar value impact on specified consumers, a bar which is incredibly high to meet.

  48. Usual WindBourne lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you ever tell the truth WindBourne?
    Show some examples of these lies you are claiming...

  49. Re:Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Windy again pretending to be a native English speaker.

    I do not blame ANY of these companies for there actions.

    Don't they teach proper English in India?

  50. Why are your posts always so full of shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why constantly make shit up?
    Can you ever back up anything that you say?

  51. But I'm Windbourne !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please believe my lies, it's all I've got.

  52. Does the EU collectt taxes? by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

    Well that it news to me I always belivedthat it is themember states that do the taxsation, foes the EU realy tax any entety directly? Inthis context thas is impotant because if the EU dos not tax anyone, butissues fines it wouldbe rather easyto pat themmoreinfinesthan i taxes.

    1. Re: Does the EU collectt taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you talking about.

      -1 gibberish.

  53. Re:Yup. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    As Zen boy shows, the top 5 fines against companies come against American companies
    Lets look at them.
    1) Microsoft was fined more than Servier, who likely cost ppl's lives. Please.
    2) Good with going after Qualcomm/Apple. I do think that 1.2B was excessive considering that Servier was .5B, but apparently, so does Qualcomm and now, the EU justice.
    3) Intel being charged 1.45 B for lowering their price to get others to use Intel over AMD? Please. That is pure competition at work. Thankfully, EU Justice is look at it, and will likely either kill it or cut it way down
    4) Totally great with EU going after Google for the Google shopping. That entire episode is the very definition of monopoly abuse, just like Servier was. Of course, 2.7B strikes me as excessive considering that BOTH Servier and Telefónica were fined about 1/6 and 1/10 of that. However, there is no doubt that all 3 were abusive monopolies.
    5) Then you have the recent Android action. Google allows you to install android, as you see fit.
    HOWEVER, if you want Google's help AND Play store, then you have to agree to install Google's apps. I see nothing wrong with that.
    Of course, paying them to install only Google's android as well as search is an issue. BUT, $5B, when they charge servier .5B for killing ppl, but otherwise doing the same thing? No. That makes no sense.

    So, yeah, this IS about going after American tech companies.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  54. Re:Yup. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    good posting. Thanx.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  55. Re: Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like the rules, then don't do business in those places. It's that fucking simple. It must be worth it and profitable or they would have pulled out like your mom should have.

  56. Re: Yup. by illiac_1962 · · Score: 1

    Don't attribute malice to that which is most likely caused by just not giving a fuck.

  57. Re: Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest fines for the biggest companies, who exactly is supposed to be surprised?

    Now like you claimed, show European companies getting away with not being fined for the same things.

    Of course you can't, your just full of shit.

  58. Re: Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you couldn't find even 1 example of what you claimed.

    Where are European companies getting away with the things US companies are being fined for?

    You think what Intel did to AMD was all ok. No wonder you 'think' the way you do on most things.

  59. You're the joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all things.

  60. Perfect for a sponge country like the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suck up everyone's money, make all your profits overseas, pay no tax at home. Just sell to low tax countries.
    Act surprised when the trade deficit tripples from it's already record highs.

  61. Are you for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's like complaining Americans spend more time in jail than church. Of course they do they are criminals.

    Dame with those companies, they pay more in fines than taxes because they are breaking the law.

  62. Are you for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's like complaining Americans spend more time in jail than church. Of course they do they are criminals.

    Same with those companies, they pay more in fines than taxes because they are breaking the law.