Slashdot Mirror


Australia Parliamentary Network Hacked In Possible Foreign Government Attack

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Sydney Morning Herald: National security agencies are continuing to scour the Parliament's computer network for threats to MPs' data after what is being described as a "sophisticated" hack attack that could be the work of a foreign government. Alastair MacGibbon, head of the Australian Cyber Security Centre, said the government's cyber experts would work over coming days and weeks to make sure all the breaches had been detected and the hackers' presence removed. The hacking comes just three months ahead of the federal election, prompting fears that if MPs emails or data were stolen they could be used to cause political interference of the style Russia perpetrated against the United States in the 2016 presidential campaign. Sources said the fact that Parliament had significantly upgraded its cyber defense since an attack by Chinese intelligence agencies in 2011 suggested the latest hackers were highly skilled, potentially pointing to a foreign government. Mr MacGibbon stressed it was too early to say who was behind the attack but said this part of the investigation. The network is used by all MPs, including ministers. House Speaker Tony Smith and Senate President Scott Ryan said in a joint statement there was "no evidence that any data has been accessed or taken at this time, however this will remain subject to ongoing investigation." They said they had no evidence the hack was an effort to "influence the outcome of parliamentary processes or to disrupt or influence electoral or political processes."

31 comments

  1. This is what happens.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .....when your top cyber security advisor is a lowly EL2.

    Pay peanuts, get monkeys.

    1. Re:This is what happens.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      elephants like peanuts too
      anyone seen creimette lately

    2. Re:This is what happens.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimette has a new video explaining Microsoft's "Get Certified with Confidence" special offer and GetCertified4Less has a better discount on that special offer.

  2. Evidence? by AHuxley · · Score: 0

    But code litter?
    Set around 9 to 5 Moscow time?
    IP range?
    Powerful Bear code litter left all over the computer?
    Will the magic code litter left to be found be Korean, Farsi, Chinese and Russian?
    Did all the data move out on a new 100000/100000 network?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is the influence market out there that should be big enough to feed even talented and well-trained hackers. It wouldn't be so far fetched to think that many of the so-called nation state hacks are in fact perpetrated for the benefit of those organizations. Evidence can be seen in the way they harvest social media handles during the national and local elections of even the smallest states, being ready to sell the services to the local actors willing to break their election laws. The only requirement is probably the sufficient level of development and the use of social media as a source of influence and news.

  3. What a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just after the opt out cut off date for the my health record too. We can definitely trust the Australian government with the sensitive medical data of the Australian public after something like this happens to their internal systems....

    1. Re: What a joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This

  4. Cut them off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Frankly I really don't know why we, the west, allow interconnects with Russia, China and North Korea.

    They are really more trouble than they are worth, cut them off their interconnects and let them pursue their own path.

    1. Re:Cut them off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How else would the US be able to frame them?

    2. Re:Cut them off by AHuxley · · Score: 0

      How can NATO and 5 eye nations spy on a Russia and China if the network is not working.
      A US embassy worker talks with a Russian gov/mil worker and hands them an email address and network information.
      Lots of US cash for top secrets emailed out of Russian mil/gov.
      Nobody from an embassy, US backed NGO wants to get seen collecting the material sold in person.
      So the internet to Russia and China stays on.

      Want a color revolution in Russia? To have Communist China become like free Taiwan?
      That needs western social media to spread the slogan, show the interviews, the "freedom" messages and plan protests.
      The English speaking charismatic Russian protest leaders giving interviews on time for the US news cycle.
      Everyone spying on Russia needs the internet in Russia to be working, fast and ubiquitous.
      Spying and Western funded protests in Russia by Western NGO's depend on good internet in Russia.
      Russia has to believe it really needs the internet for networked science, education, games and fun.
      Russia without the internet would result in a lot of CIA and MI6 work getting discovered due to the number of people having to collect information in person again.
      With the make up, wigs, SUV, walking, getting found with Russian secret documents.
      With internet working, spying is a network connection to the West with all the risk is back on the person who wants to "spy" for US cash.
      To walk out with a data set, send it out of Russia via the internet. Just another encrypted file moving along the vastness of the internet.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  5. Oh, those Russians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    "prompting fears that if MPs emails or data were stolen they could be used to cause political interference of the style Russia perpetrated against the United States in the 2016 presidential campaign"

    Do tell more, what was the actual interference? Or is the Sydney Morning Herald just making stuff up?

    Maybe it should read, political interference of the style the US does around the world to push elections whichever way the MIC wants a country to turn.

    1. Re:Oh, those Russians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...cause political interference...perpetrated against the United States

      Clickbait summary implies the election would have gone another way without "the Russians". Seriously folks - Hillary was a gift to the Republican party, she had no chance of winning.

    2. Re: Oh, those Russians! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >no chance.

      There were about 300,000 votes that made the difference in a knife-edge election. I call you out as a troll.

  6. Finally, Australia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Australian MPs are starting to learn why private & secure communications are essential for a democracy to function well. Now can they drop the draconian, Orwellian proposals for violating all Australian's privacy?

    1. Re:Finally, Australia... by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Nah they'll just use it as a pretext to ratchet up the paranoid surveilance state. We're talking politicians here, not reasonable men

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re: Finally, Australia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have the wrong end of the stick there. It's only politicians' network connections that must be totally secure. The rest of us can get fucked because.... terrorists!

    3. Re:Finally, Australia... by mentil · · Score: 1

      Just give them a year's free credit monitoring, let the subcontractor responsible off scot-free, giving them preferred status in future bidding, and everything's ok right? What's good for the goose...

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  7. Specialised? by pigsycyberbully · · Score: 0

    What security? what detection system? what kind of specialised attack? what foreign government Jimmy's bedroom?
    News that does not reveal news.

    This posting was typed on a specialised keyboard from a specialised computer on a specialised desktop in a specialised property at a specialised location, on a specialised news story about a specialised hack. In a specialised country in a specialised location. https://youtu.be/ZyasLH9GfRI

    1. Re:Specialised? by pigsycyberbully · · Score: 0

      Department of Parliamentary Services Parliament House 202.14.81.88 Windows Server 2008 Microsoft-IIS/7.5 08/02/2019
      https://202.14.81.88/

  8. My bet is on man in basement by Severus+Snape · · Score: 1

    Alastair MacGibbon, head of the Australian Cyber Security Centre said, "You might know of some of their entry points and some of the ways they’ve grafted themselves into a system and you can take action against those and do things like the password reset,"

    The article stinks of a phishing attack and it sounds like they haven't figured out 2FA yet. Which says a lot about his claims of who could be responsible. Who remembers Comodo?

    What is interesting about actual nation state attacks now taking place is if the locales, IPs, timezones, code snippets point to say; China. Well then they've probably been set up. Unless you're NK, they clearly can't hide shit and are happy to take credit. I recall the leaks that WannaCry came from had tools to change code to make it look foreign.

    1. Re:My bet is on man in basement by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Betcha some MP clicked on a bad link.

      I love the second last paragraph of the article:

      "This is a great system to be targetting if you are a nation-state. Lots of juicy correspondence between staffers about who is doing what and dirt files on politicians."

      Perhaps such networks should be world readable so citizens can see who's wasting government resources gossiping.

    2. Re:My bet is on man in basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Who got pissed at last night's booze up and who's shagging who. Highly sensitive national security data. It beggars belief that any "nation state" would be in any way interested in what happens among those Canberra drongoes.

    3. Re:My bet is on man in basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, it would be difficult to see how a foreign entity could do more harm to Australia than these dropkicks have done by themselves. Probably it's the mer-cans inserting a live feed so they can keep track of who is PM is this week, don't wan't to embarass the pres again.

  9. Open Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most governments claim to be open and transparent, yet they all panic when someone accesses their computer files.

  10. Australian Government is filled with morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... who can barely operate a computer ,let alone recognise if computer security has been compromised.

    1. Re: Australian Government is filled with morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... could have been l33t al-Qaeda h@X0Rz. Did any Australians like Larry Silverstein have double indemnity insurance policies against hack attacks or act of terror or something really ODD like that? Real news should investigate!

  11. Re:This is what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and you're an example of what happens when morons fall for any flimsy piece of shit propaganda.
    Do you really think Chinese hackers leave calling cards?

  12. Another US eavesdropper discovered in Australian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is really quick to start pointing fingers elsewhere but we've known for many decades that the US has been spying on its allies every bit as much as it does on its foes (which it creates with absurd rapidity). Until here is actual solid *evidence* of who is behind this particular incident but believe the US to be by far the most likely culprit, based on past history.

    Go to it trolls.

  13. Re:This is what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well if they're anything like Russian hackers they do when they want people to know that they've done something.

  14. Didn't notice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The influence of malicious players in your government back in 1996?