Slashdot Mirror


Mars Lander Seismometer Gets Protective Shield (theguardian.com)

Nasa's InSight Mars lander has placed a domed shield over its seismometer, completing that instrument's deployment. From a report: The seismometer will look for evidence of ongoing seismic activity on the red planet to provide data about the deep interior of Mars. This will help scientists determine how the planet formed. The seismometer, called the seismic experiment for interior structure (Seis), is the lander's highest priority science instrument. It is needed to complete about three-quarters of the mission's scientific objectives. The spacecraft touched down on 26 November 2018. On 19 December, a robotic arm picked up the instrument from its storage position and placed it on the martian surface about 1.6 metres away from the spacecraft.

24 comments

  1. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Need to protect it from all the fat Americans that will be landing there, thanks Elon

    1. Re:Good by olsmeister · · Score: 0

      You mean impacting there at whatever the terminal velocity is on Mars (I'll leave someone else to calculate that).

    2. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Maybe the lander can go repair the snot out of the rover

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Need to protect it from all the fat Americans that will be landing there, thanks Elon

      Being overweight was once a luxury. Thanks to scientific and technological advancements now it's a common problem in the US.

      Perhaps the trend will continue and people will whine about pervasive 200 year-old Americans filling up all the Musky-Martian luxury vacation spaceship seats.

    4. Re:Good by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      ...pervasive 200 year-old Americans...

      You can already find these at a cruise ship breakfast buffet.

  2. Silly question about the seismometer. by KixWooder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can anyone tell me what all the bow-tie looking symbols are that painted all over the seismometer. It looks like they are on the shield, as well.

    --
    I hate fat people.
    1. Re:Silly question about the seismometer. by Xolotl · · Score: 2

      These are reference points for assesing the position and orientation of the seismometer and the shield as they are put in place by the robot arm. They're like the smilar little bow-tie symbols on crash test dummies etc.

    2. Re:Silly question about the seismometer. by necro81 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Those are called fiducials. They are used to very precisely determine the location, distance, and orientation of an object when pictures of that object are taken. Because of their contrasting colors, the edges of different "wedges" are easy for a human or computer vision system to pick up; the center point is the intersection of those edges, etc. The "ovalness" of the fiducial can be used to determine the angle to the camera.

      The same kind of fiducials are placed all over crash tests to track motion and displacement.

    3. Re:Silly question about the seismometer. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1, Funny

      They are used to very precisely determine the location, distance, and orientation of an object when pictures of that object are taken.

      Location: On Mars
      Distance: Far away
      Orientation: Under federal statute, we are not allowed to ask

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Silly question about the seismometer. by KixWooder · · Score: 1

      I figured as much, but it's nice to have a title for them. Thanks for the info.

      --
      I hate fat people.
    5. Re: Silly question about the seismometer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very confusing word. Like lottery versus pottery.

    6. Re: Silly question about the seismometer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very nice !

  3. No Microscopes on Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    It is the ultimate proof of just how pathetic be-tas really are in how easily they swallow any and all guff from those they give their 'trust' to. Any given be-ta is trained by the specific set of 'authority/hero' figures carefully offered up to the be-ta.

    So here we have another 'Mars' story that can safely ignore the elephant in the room. Let's dribble about more instrumentation while ignoring the absolute ban on microscopes. Even tho the original issue about Mars was always "is there life on the Red Planet?".

    Recently Australian scientists have perfected methods to examine fossils for atomic traces of evidence- leading to the recent announcement that a key earth fossil showed the remains of ANIMAL life, not plant life. But the same tech has also proven that meterorites known to originate off Earth contain fossilised evidence of microscopic life- as was widely accepted in the late 1960s before Organised Religion pulled a 'big bang' on the data.

    Famously the American Mars probe that used chemical tests confirmed life on Mars, but the 'Church' rapidly converted that situation into "seeing is believing- chemical schemical"- the present position of all that speak for NASA. But advances in tech meant we could also "see" on Mars by simply sending microscopes there- a 'difficulty' solved by having outlets like Slashdot 'explain' why microscopes would be a "waste of time". And then the 'distraction' strategy of endless stalling coverage like this story.

    How many times have you read of water being discovered on Mars "for the first time". This one has been ongoing for more than tens years now. Not to mention endless rovers with worthless surface videos.

    Organised Religion has a power ignored by be-tas told to be both 'soft' religious and yet certain in their belief that the 'Church' is an irrelevant long spent force. Yet even the dumbest be-ta must be capable of pondering why NASA (and the Russians) bend over backward to avoid anything that would confirm to the public that life is actually widespread in our solar system (in a microscopic form at least).

    You be-tas wanna tell me you are interested in space, yet have no desire to know about the actually distribution of life in local space? How your 'religious' masters love the mental weakness of their slaves.

    1. Re:No Microscopes on Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      what is a be-ta
      i think it lost the format wars to v-hs
      not sure though

    2. Re: No Microscopes on Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Mars is a circus

    3. Re: No Microscopes on Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      It is u, the be-ta to my al-pha

  4. shoes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    We ain't got no shoes, but whiteys on the moon.

    No, we ain't got no shoes, but whiteys on the moon.

    1. Re:shoes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      n1gga don't front. you gotz $300 shoes.

  5. Maybe too late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My health teacher said never probe a strange planet's soil with your seismometer without first putting a domed shield over it.

    1. Re:Maybe too late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i probed creimette's crater with my seismometer
      if the grove is rockin
      don't come a knockin

    2. Re:Maybe too late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimette doesn't have time for your buggery. He has a new video explaining Microsoft's "Get Certified with Confidence" special offer and GetCertified4Less has a better discount on that special offer.

    3. Re: Maybe too late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the link to that awesome video

  6. Too bad they couldn't come up a recursive acronym by sconeu · · Score: 2

    If they could have come up with an MIC portion "on Mars InSight Craft"?

    Then it could have been a recursive acronym... SEISMIC Experiment for Interior Structure on Mars InSight Craft

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  7. toxic community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did hope for normative trips to mars and extended lifespan while defending a people as being victims of circumstance warrant someone taking the time to moderate -1?

    Are people so cynical here that the mere mention of hope or absence of insult isn't welcome?