Slashdot Mirror
Verizon Plans To Roll Out Its 5G Mobile Network In 30 Cities This Year (engadget.com)
Verizon has announced plans to turn on its 5G mobile network in 30 U.S. cities this year. "It revealed the plan during an investor meeting Thursday, though didn't disclose the list of cities," reports Engadget. From the report: Verizon already offers home broadband service via 5G in Los Angeles, Houston, Indianapolis and Sacramento. This month, it hinted at upcoming rollouts in New York City and Atlanta, as well as Medford, Massachusetts, suggesting Verizon will bring 5G to nearby Boston too. The provider plans to flip the switch on its mobile 5G network in the first half of this year, and it will expand its home 5G service to more markets later in 2019. One of the first phones to support Verizon's nascent 5G network will be the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, which was unveiled yesterday at Samsung's Unpacked event. The device has a larger screen and battery than the S10 Plus, and will temporarily be a Verizon exclusive before expanding to other carriers in the weeks after launch. It's slated to go on sale sometime "in the first half of 2019."
5G isn't for the customer -- the customer already has fast data in the form of 4G. It's for device makers who want to put a camera and mic in everything, phoning (hah!) home to the mothership, governments that want to roll out surveillance networks on the cheap. You're the product, not the customer.
Me? I've turned off my data plan and now pay under $20/mo, if and when I choose to bring my cell with me. All hail Ned Ludd!
Meanwhile I don't have any cell service whatsoever at my home in Maine. And I'm not even far from the center of my town and only 15 minutes from 2 cities...
When 5G gives everyone cancer does verizon pay the bill?
here in nowheresville, middle america, we only have 4g in spotty areas in a narrow band along the interstate only... everything else is still edge and 3g, and we're gonna lose those plus significant rural voice coverage in december 2019 (confirmed by local verizon corporate rep), and we all get to 'upgrade' our handsets to get this reduced service. thanks verizon for fucking us over. we really do appreciate the hard work and dedication you've shown in your anal rape of rural markets.
Verizon has announced plans to turn on its 5G mobile network in 30 U.S. cities this year.
Cities, cities, all the time cities!
Wireless isn't (just) about cities, where you have a concentration of devices to connect, short distances between them, and infrastructure for building infrastructure.
Wireless is about being able to serve customers WHEREVER they are.
Yes, that includes devices moving around in cities, in a sea of tiny cells to serve the enormous data throughput needs through the limited radio bandwidth. But, more critically, it also includes drive-through / flyover country, with a sparse distribution of devices which can be served by a handful of giant cells, cited on high pointsthe or towers.
This serves the city customers, when they're on the move through the thin spaces between cities, and (as a bonus) the the rural customers, too far apart to be served cost-effectively by landlines.
When cell phone service was first deployed, the limited number of carriers understood what they were selling was the ability to be connected to the (then voice only) net, no matter where they were
But the new generations of administrators of the sea-of-competitive-carriers, deploying the new generations of cell phone/data technology, in their (legitimate) pursuit of profit, have forgotten what it is they're selling. By trying to cherry-pick high density collections of usually-near-home customers to get the most financial bang for the infrastructure investment, they've left even their urban customers down when they're on the move.
The mistake is trying to treat each cell as a profit center, and not installing cells where the traffic through the cell doesn't pay for it (directly). This misses that a cell in a low-traffic are eliminates a hole where the customers who are USUALLY in a high-traffic area come to occasionally, and are suddenly not receiving the service they have paid for and may truly need. Revenue from a handful of residents in the boonies-cell's service area is a bonus.
So they're rolling out the new tech in a few cities? Well, you've got to start somewhere. (Yawn!) Wake me when they get enough of a clue to deploy a few rural cells, too, and create a coverage map that looks like a paint splash, rather than a few carefully drawn dots.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
After Superstorm Sandy, Verizon refused to repair a lot of their damaged copper POTS lines, and required customers affected to use (4G) wireless connected via an adapter to their landline phones.
They're rolling out 5G to kill off copper completely, and to recover from the financial disaster of FiOS as a broadband strategy.
Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
how will they differentiate between 3G, 4G, and 5G cancer?
Donald Trump's gonna roll out 6G!
I tell you, the best wireless. You're gonna get tired of winning this wireless.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
... I pretty much ignore all the 5G announcements of late. The cell industry definitely blew it, big time, with all the unsubstantiated 5G hype. I just do not believe what they say anymore. The cell ISPs need a new marketing team.
5G poles have been popping up around the Tampa Bay area in Florida. But I have no idea who is installing them.
How can I determine who is putting up the towers?
So, is this so-called 5G going to live up to the 4G specs in terms of speed?
Is this trying to intentionally kill insects or is it being done unknowingly?