Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates, Amazon and Google Urge Followers To Share Data On Teacher Friends

theodp writes: Facebook may be facing the threat of a multi-billion dollar FTC fine for privacy lapses that included allowing companies to obtain users' email addresses from their friends, but that didn't discourage Bill Gates from taking to Twitter to urge his 46.5 million followers to give up the names and email addresses of teachers so they can be contacted by tech-bankrolled Code.org for a chance to receive a "Computer Science Scholarship" (attend Professional Development workshops). Or Amazon. Or Google. "The success of our professional learning program depends on the work of our partners to spread the word," explained Code.org in a Medium Post. "Corporate partners like Amazon, Infosys, and Google are rallying their employees and communities to nominate a teacher, and so are fellow teachers, parents, and students. We couldn't do it without you! [...] Code.org (and these scholarships) are supported by: Amazon, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Facebook, Google, Infosys Foundation USA, Microsoft [...] Code.org has prepared almost 100,000 educators to teach our courses, and they give our program rave reviews. We welcome teachers from all subject areas-no CS experience needed!"

In May, Code.org announced it was crowdsourcing a database of U.S. K-12 schools that teach -- or don't teach -- CS, with a goal to "gather data for 100% of U.S. schools by the end of 2018." The database would be used by the nonprofit and the CS community to "make our shared vision [for every school to teach computer science] a reality." Several months later, Amazon disclosed its involvement with the data collection effort, explaining it "will help us bring access to the schools that need it most." Amazon on Thursday announced it had selected 1,000 high schools to receive Amazon-funded CS classes and will be tapping another lucky 1,000 schools in the next few months. An Amazon press release said the company hopes to "inspire and educate 10 million children and young adults each year from underprivileged, underrepresented, and underserved communities to pursue careers in the fast-growing field of computer science and coding" through its Amazon Future Engineer program, which the e-tailer describes as "a four-part, childhood-to-career program."

65 comments

  1. I will avoid formatting my friends by uulbri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a CS engineer, I would never recommend any of my teacher friends to attend a brainwash from the GAFAMs in order to help them format the students for the industry.
    If the GAFAMs really want to help education, they may start by paying their taxes.

    1. Re: I will avoid formatting my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But the goal is to pump out CS majors in order to flood the market with them to drive down salaries. How could anyone possibly be against that? Can't do that and collect and store email addresses in a database if people aren't told to signal boost....

      On the count of three, everybody with me now! ... One! ... Two! ... Ethics is for suckers when it comes to business as usual in the US of friggin A!

      If you can do 'em, screw 'em. People don't become wealthy, they don't live their best lives, by being squeemish over selling out their friends, family members, neighbors, and colleagues.

    2. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 0

      If the GAFAMs really want to help education, they may start by paying their taxes.

      I'm curious - which of the GAFAMs didn't pay their taxes?

      If you know that they didn't, I have to assume you're a tax lawyer who works for one of them, and didn't report whatever illegal activity you noticed when doing so, so you should be able to cite chapter and verse of the tax law(s) they broke, as well as provide info to the relevant prosecutors....

      Do note that if (as I suspect) you're NOT a tax lawyer, it's unlikely in the extreme that you have clue one whether any particular entity (other than yourself, and maybe not that) has broken ANY tax laws, anywhere....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re: I will avoid formatting my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Honestly, forget about salaries, think about quality of life while at work. A friend of mine is working on a degree in something and is having to take a python course. He asked me for some help and the stuff he didn't understand I didn't believe somebody could find confusing. He's a nice guy and all, but some people just aren't wired to program. I'll play TTRPGs with him, but I don't want to work with him.

    4. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, it was in the news last week that amazon was paying 0 in taxes on something like 5 billion in profits. Now, it's perfectly legal, but one could rightfully argue it is also them "not paying taxes" which may be what the GP actually meant.

    5. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by dcw3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was $5B in '17 and over $11B in '18. That doesn't mean they're doing anything illegal, or immoral. From CNN...

      "This is tax avoidance, not tax evasion. There's no indication of any wrongdoing, except on the part of Congress," said Matthew Gardner, senior fellow at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a liberal think tank.

      US tax code allows money-losing companies to reduce their future taxable income.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    6. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yes it's just a huge coincidence there is a loophole every place a corporation could be paying taxes.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yes it seems that all the loopholes corporations need to evade taxes are right there. Imagine that!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    8. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right, if it is legal it must also then be moral. That makes a lot of grey area much clearer thanks.

    9. Re: I will avoid formatting my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because something is legal or illegal doesn't mean it should be. If I had $5 billion in profits, I'd expect a sizable chunk to disappear because I make far less than $5 billion and I see a sizable chunk.

      If you're for promoting exploitative behaviors at the cost of others, then that's you. I for one am not because that's why this country is so screwed up already. We worship exploitation for some reason. There are differences between optimization, outright exploitation, and praising creativity.

    10. Re: I will avoid formatting my friends by dougdonovan · · Score: 0

      anything backed by gates, im in.

    11. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by hey! · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be entirely bad if it really made people suitable for employment, but it strikes me more as a *vanity* project than as anything actually practical.

      You can teach anyone with a decent education to code in a few weeks. Mastery takes longer, of course, but starting out young with only marginally competent teachers is a recipe for a lifetime of mediocrity.

      Better to focus on analytical/inductive reasoning skills, effective writing, and a broad and sound understanding of science, math, and culture.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re: I will avoid formatting my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But all the cool Kids are doing it?

    13. Re: I will avoid formatting my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, silly.

      The goal is LOOK LIKE you pump out CS majors, or at least start the stream on the lowest end, and so when there is a mere trickle on the other end (because you AREN'T FUNDING COLLEGE EDUCATIONS) you can simply shrug your shoulders, blame the educational system and keep right on hiring H1-Bs.

      See? It's a win-go-fuck-yourself.

    14. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Hey ass-hole, it is well know that companies like Microsoft, Google and Apple off-shore their profits in order to evade paying taxes. Tim Cook laments about this all the time. Got Trillions of dollars off-shore but doesn't want bring them to the US because he'll have to pay taxes. The EU told Apple they owe Ireland, Apple's tax free zone in Europe, back taxes. Tim Cook said Ireland can have taxes or jobs not both.

      You can fuck off now.

    15. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, everybody thinks to know what it should be done, and that's fine, but money should not give power for a few to push their beliefs over the majority without proper trial, if that was the case, industry could turn children into laboratory subjects to.... wait a minute!

    16. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the correct answer is all of them because they all shelter money made overseas in tax havens. Amazon is just lucky enough to pay 0 taxes on US earned money. I will happily vote for anyone that campaigns on breaking them up, as I feel they are the greatest threat to society right now - those taxes are all getting handed over to smaller businesses like mine.

    17. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Well specifically how much tax should they pay? The amount is defined by the law, if you think the law is immoral then you need to change the law. Do you just volunteer to pay additional tax or do you pay the amount you need to pay as defined by the law?

    18. Re:I will avoid formatting my friends by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Not disagreeing at all. I'm a conservative, but believe we need to get the money out of politics because it's corrupting the system. SCOTUS fucked up when they bought into the "corporations are people" bullshit.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  2. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a collection of over 1.1 million email addresses from known spammers/hackers on my websites, maybe I should submit them.

    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...maybe I should submit them.

      Yes, please do!

  3. Spam spam spam spam. Wonderfull SPAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not care WHAT your motivation is. Do NOT send me unsolicited e-mails!

  4. Bill Gates? Who the fuck is Bill Gates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And why would I want to "follow" him? On Twitter, of all things?

    What's this "Twitter" thing, anyway?

    1. Re:Bill Gates? Who the fuck is Bill Gates? by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, Twitter is a place where you get banned for telling people to "learn to code"...

      --
      Check your premises.
  5. data share by rocky700 · · Score: 1

    We all know that data sharing is a thing that we all are scared of and by the post, we can see how big companies are sharing our data and making millions and billions of money. The whole database is being transferred from one company to another. As I got to know this from https://applesupportnumber.net... while being concerned with the data on my ios devices.

  6. Underprivileged, underrepresented by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Focus on the people who can actually pass all their tests and exams every year.
    Without needing extra non academic consideration.
    Full academic scholarships for the very best in every state after all passing exams.
    Years of testing should find the top percentage of every generation, every decade.
    The underrepresented can sit the same free tests, pass the same exams as all other students.
    Data sets, workshops, a new CoC, money, academic programs, charity cant help people who can't and won't study.

    Some people want to be vets, lawyers, historians. To play a sport, do music. Learn a language. Become a mathematician.

    Put that new support into all of education.
    Let people select what they want to do and ensure the needed academic support is not all about computers and a code CoC.
    Let the underprivileged select their own professions. Carpenter, plumber, law, arts, math, languages, sport, math.
    They may want to find work with topics such as agriculture, chemistry and finance.
    Computer work is not underrepresented. It just needs really smart people who can actually study.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Underprivileged, underrepresented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You spew a good churn, but what in your bullshit spiel about "really smart people who actually study" is anything of any actual value? Do you just talk because you can? You have a captive audience and that's enough?

      You've literally said this exact bullshit phrased slightly differently at least a half dozen times. If you were smart you wouldn't be giving this useless unsolicited bullshit advice ad nauseam. You'd have better hobbies.

    2. Re: Underprivileged, underrepresented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you were smart, you would have understood the meaning. Instead you are upset at him/her due to your lack of comprehension. They are right, deal with it

    3. Re: Underprivileged, underrepresented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were smart it wouldn't be so retarded, slightly changed from the last time it was spammed to no consequence. His hobbies are as worthless and faggoty as your personality. Do yourselves a favor and die together soon.

  7. I guess all these efforts to monitize teachers by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    just forgot to buy the data from Bookface. /s

  8. If you ever wondered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the evidence that these people are nothing but a bunch of narcissistic psychopaths. Collecting information on unrelated people, invading their privacy at your own convenience at any time with out a thought or care about what they might think about it, as if they'd themselves, personally, would enjoy having to deal with all the crap that gets pushed at you non-stop when you can't afford to hire layers of people to filter it down for you.

    The mental disconnect of these people are unfathomable.

    1. Re:If you ever wondered by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Here's the evidence that these people are nothing but a bunch of narcissistic psychopaths. Collecting information on unrelated people, invading their privacy at your own convenience at any time with out a thought or care ...The mental disconnect of these people are unfathomable.

      The real mental disconnect here is that Gates will most likely succeed in getting email addresses for almost every teacher on the planet. A sufficient percentage of his followers will comply with his request - either unthinkingly or with full knowledge of the implications, and frankly I'm not sure which is worse.

      We as a society are selling out each other's privacy, and making ourselves available to brainwashing programs, at an astonishing rate and with hardly ever a second thought. What we're allowing the tech sector to do to us is the important consideration here - the voracious psychopathy of tech corporations, and corporations in general, hasn't been news for a very long time.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:If you ever wondered by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      While I'm in general agreement with your comment on the companies, I don't think public school teacher's email addresses should be private. They're paid for by our taxes, so unless there's a specific privacy/security concern, I don't think any government data should be kept private. Am I missing something?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    3. Re:If you ever wondered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one thing to have a public address, it's another thing to sign up other people to a spam campaign.

      And why do teachers need publicly listed addresses? They're for use for school activities, meaning for their students and those student's parents. There's no good reason why someone three states over should be emailing them. Private, public, and publicly listed are all different things.

    4. Re:If you ever wondered by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      While I'm in general agreement with your comment on the companies, I don't think public school teacher's email addresses should be private. They're paid for by our taxes, so unless there's a specific privacy/security concern, I don't think any government data should be kept private. Am I missing something?

      It isn't a privacy issue, it is yet another way to aggregate data for darn near nothing. email addresses of individual teachers can be found on school web pages, no doubt all of their students and their parents hve them. But to en masse send them to billyboy, or you know many will be posted right to Twitter's toxic environment, this will be a problem. There are people in this world who don't like teachers for their political leanings (perceived or otherwise).

      It's like my email address isn't any secret, but I'm not going to post it to Twitter with a note saying "Send bobs and vagene".

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  9. A Test? by Barny · · Score: 2

    Maybe it's a test of basic courtesy? When you enter someone's details, they get contacted and asked if someone asked their permission to post their email address. If they say no, an orbital laser fries the brain of the person who DIDN'T HAVE THE COMMON FUCKING COURTESY TO ASK BEFORE SHARING PEOPLE'S DETAILS.

    Onto a more legitimate point, at least they are asking people and not just skimming it all automatically.

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
    1. Re:A Test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Onto a more legitimate point, at least they are asking people and not just skimming it all automatically.

      ...as far as we know.

    2. Re:A Test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Onto a more legitimate point, at least they are asking people and not just skimming it all automatically.

      This is their excuse to use the skimmed data. When asked where they go it, they can say some true bullshit like "this service receives contact info from people related to your position" even if the email's only source was data mining.

    3. Re:A Test? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'asking' part is just a courtesy.

  10. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would any smart kids want to study computer science? Wages in Silicon Valley haven't gone up in a decade, while cost of living more than doubled. The ranks of unemployed programmers are steadily growing, as more and more American programmers are laid off and replaced with H1B scabs.

    When I started out, programming was a profession with a bright future. A great field for smart young men without the family connections to make it in the old boys clubs of law and business.

    Nowadays? Programming is dumbed down factory work - and we don't even have a union. Moreover, the big majority of what Silicon Valley builds is frankly evil.

    Only a fool would waste their time studying computer science today. Better that students learn history, literature, & art. Those won't help ones career any more, or any less, than CS. But at least it will help one be a cultured and civic-minded citizen.

    1. Re:why? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Bingo. Companies haven't made it a good place to study. Now they reap what they sow.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with you; wish you also posted or pasted under your nick (won't send it to Billy boy =)

      Back on topic, this scheme sounds too much like We want teachers to teach MS Word as it is widely accepted on most recent computers in 3 companies you can name

  11. Anyone have experience with these programs? by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to wonder about programs that are supposed to get ordinary teachers to teach CS. I expect many of us had teachers (especially in primary school) who were teaching stuff they personally did not like or understand. Seems to me that's the likely result here: take someone who doesn't really like CS, and doesn't really understand it either - and have them try to teach it. Seems like a great way to turn students off.

    Anyone have practical experience with these programs, who can comment?

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Anyone have experience with these programs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't have any practical experience with these programs, but I do have practical experience with the companies and have even worked at a couple. So I can say they aren't to be trusted. These programs aren't being developed for the benefit of the students or society in general. You don't need to look at the programs, look at who's creating them and their history and how they currently operate. As petty as local governments can be, do you really want to aid the slow slide to corporate funded education? It's a game to them in how many people they can push their products on regardless of if those products would be helpful or not with no regard for the future as well.

    2. Re:Anyone have experience with these programs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother-in-law taught grade school Code.org programs. She liked it because as the computer teacher for a Catholic school, she could offer something that the average grade school computer teacher couldn't: rudimentary coding classes. As for the classes themselves, they are mostly computer-based puzzle games that require breaking down a character's movement into logical steps (using loops and conditionals and such) so that the character can complete the tasks they need to do. Some kids really get into it and blow through the game, and some are slower, just like with any subject. The kids won't be writing web apps in Django or whatever, but they will at least do some basic logical thinking.

    3. Re: Anyone have experience with these programs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HS mathematics teacher here.

      I tried a few of the lessons, but only a few were able to complete the rudimentary lessons. The rest needed lots of help, and it took time away from teaching the lessons I was required by the state to complete at the end of the year.

      For students interested in coding, they can get better instruction from a dedicated teacher with more complete knowledge of the subject.

  12. No they won't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if people like you repeat it often enough, they might start to believe they have to conform, and help you self-fulfill your prophecy. Congratulations.

    It'd likr with Justin Bieber. Who only got popular because everyone kept dragging him throigh town for hating him and saying he is for teenage girls and way too popular, even though he wasn't yet... Until said teenage girls went "Okay. If you say so. I guess I'll fill my role.".

    Sometimes I wonder how many of the people like you are paid false-flag puppets, and part of a campaign.

    1. Re: No they won't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a trend is and has been occurring, it's hardly a self-fulfilling prophecy to observe and point out a trend as OP did. The only way to stop a trend is to make people aware of the trend. Arguing that being aware of a trend to avoid it leads to a trend is utter BS promoting ignorance that only advantages those exploiting the trend. Potential for change requires knowledge while ignorance is business as usual.

      Your post is guilty of exactly what it protests: puppeteering. Points for recursion though

  13. A good argument for data privacy laws by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we can't get you to sign up we'll get friends to do it for you so we can spam you.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  14. Sure, I'll help my competition. NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this competitive world, why would anyone help their future competition? This could impact your ability to work, your pay, your family status for generations.

    Are people really that stupid?

    It is clear why tech giants want this - it dilutes the labor market and drops prices for them. Do CS and programming people want to be paid like McDonald's cashiers? Then help your competition.

    Ok, I'm not really this hard up, but I'd like for my at least 1 of my 3 kids to have a good life coding for a living. One is an architect, the other is a social media "inflluencer" and the last one, the least likely to do anything, has gotten a job doing IoT stuff in a PhD program. I was shocked, since he never showed any interest beyond gaming with any computers. He doesn't have a smart phone, and is very happy with a $20 cell phone.

    Anyway, looks like he will be doing coding. I won't be helping his competition, even though I rarely find 4 people out of 100 in a college CS program who are going to remain in coding.

    BTW, I used to teach Linux at the local University. I seems kids are dumber and dumber, with a few, very few, talented folks. I'd assign a trivial shell script and you'd think I was asking for a 50 pg research paper on _War and Peace_. And I'm tired of girls thinking that crying about how hard it is will help their grades. You'd think they'd be smart enough to google the answer - but if there isn't a smartphone app, this generation is pretty dumb, mostly.

  15. They will be brainwashed by someone else. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be it the copyright lobby, the magazine sales lobby, or another group.

    I can't even remember all the pitches teachers made to me in k-8 that in hindsight were obviously propaganda for some special interest group or other, all preached as dogma. Made me understand a bit more those parents who kept their children out of the various activities or 'special education sessions'.

    Disappointing, but it's not a first for our schoolteachers.

  16. Sounds like intimidation to me by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

    Urging followers to "out" the friends of teachers...

  17. Nope by dwillden · · Score: 2

    I have many friends who are teachers, from elementary to HS and college. Not going to post a single one of their email addresses. Because it's not my information to post. If they want spam they can sign up for it.

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a good old fashioned misinformation campaign?
      Adjust the signal to noise a bit for the worse...

  18. Employee value by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Why don't they share more of their success with their workers? Maybe then kids will see other people who are successful in development and follow them. When you work for a company you are creating value. If they are going to strip all that value away and leave the worker with the bare minimum of compensation that the market dictates regardless of the value they create then they will get a poor job pool to pick from because there is no motivation to educate in it.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  19. Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, now that many states are imposing moratoriums on charters, they have to do SOMETHING to get all that tasty data. These fools will never change, only regulation and legal action will put them in their place. Associating any of their names with education, or intelligence for that matter, is a disgrace.

  20. They will remain friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teacher or not, these firms should know better., and not resort to scumbag tactics. (What else is it called? Oh I remember-- d-bag tactics, like exes do)

    1. Re:They will remain friends by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Only sociopaths make it to be the head of large companies, so they wouldn't see what is wrong with this.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  21. Maybe we could just teach math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those of us who know CS know that much of it is just math. Seen any stats on how students are performing at math? Just because the internet and its associated riches and fame made computers fashionable doesn't mean that suddenly everyone who sucked at math will become good at CS. This is dumb.

  22. virus by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    If someone went viral with a video or something and wanted to round up all the email addresses of CEOs and executives of large companies, I wonder what the reaction would be?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re: virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to understand the differences between nobility and little people, and the faster the better. The consequences for displeasing or, worse, aggravating the rich and powerful may be grievous to you and your family.

  23. Not the same thing by a long shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dislike the big brothers as much as the next guy, but I can't see how asking clients for contacts or to spread the word is equivalent to Facebook giving these contacts away without the consent of anyone involved.

  24. Slashdot Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My Dear Slashdot Friends, I am reaching out to you because I have this great idea for how to handle privacy. What I need you to do is pass this along, because I need to reach the smartest and richest mind on the planet. So I need you get me any and all the contact information for one individual, this is not overwhelming, it is only one guy, Bill Gates. He asked his twitter followers to reach out and share their contact information for their teachers without permission, I doubt he would frown on his own information being shared. So lets get this information out there,
    • Home Phone
    • Cell Phone
    • Alt Cell Phone
    • Primary Work Phone
    • Secondary Work Phone
    • His private Airplane Phone
    • Home Address
    • Second Home Address
    • Third Home Address
    • All his office addresses

    AND be sure to include his wife and kids as well, because what is goose is good for the gander. I would not want him to circumvent sharing by hiding behind his wife and kids. Remember this is the sort of future he wants for the rest of us, he need to include him as well. Sincerely, Privacy By Gone

  25. Do not do it by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    If it's a legitimate request, it will be forwarded to them via their schools, colleges, and universities.

    If they're just trying to monetize the teachers and have them work below scale for others, it won't.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  26. Amazon by sadafba786 · · Score: 1

    To maximize the power of your product listing , ensure that the negative reviews or the complete lack of reviews is taken care of on your listing page. Both are equally lethal!