Slashdot Mirror


US Cyber Command Operation Disrupted Internet Access of Russian Troll Factory on Day of 2018 Midterms: Report (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The U.S. military blocked Internet access to an infamous Russian entity seeking to sow discord among Americans during the 2018 midterms, several U.S. officials said, a warning that the group's operations against the United States are not cost-free. The strike on the Internet Research Agency in St. Petersburg, a company underwritten by an oligarch close to President VladiÂmir Putin, was part of the first offensive cyber campaign against Russia designed to thwart attempts to interfere with a U.S. election, the officials said. "They basically took the IRA offline," according to one individual familiar with the matter who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss classified information. "They shut 'em down." The operation marked the first muscle-flexing by U.S. Cyber Command, with intelligence from the National Security Agency, under new authorities it was granted by President Trump and Congress last year to bolster offensive capabilities.

121 comments

  1. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Existence justified without the need to give proof. Government level tier.

    1. Re:Good by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thanks Comrade. Good to know you got the network up and running again.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apk impersonates me and others

      Proud of the US cyber space command

      - Delfino

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Comrade? Russia is a capitalist state for the past 25 years.

    4. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I took Russian in college in 1992, the teacher still used the word tovarishch. She didn't seem to think it had any Soviet connotations.

    5. Re:Good by speederaser · · Score: 1

      Russia is a capitalist state for the past 25 years.

      You misspelled "kleptocracy".

    6. Re:Good by jarle.aase · · Score: 1

      Is there a difference?

  2. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all

  3. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So "Russian owned" Trump gives Cyber Command authority to take out Russians during mid-terms?
    Cunning Russian, that Trump. Get Moose and Squirrel on the case.

    1. Re:Huh? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Or maybe once exposed, it was in both sides' interests to appear tough. After all, Russia thinks sanctions are bad now...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Maybe. Or maybe once exposed, it was in both sides' interests to appear tough. After all, Russia thinks sanctions are bad now...

      Exposed?

      What has been exposed, pray tell?

      After more than two fucking years, Mueller has managed to find that a few lobbyists failed to register as foreign agents?

      Two years, and that's ALL?

      From the same fucking FBI that deliberately ignored the law when James Comey pulled "no reasonable prosecutor" out of his ass in order to exonerate Hillary!?

      From the same fucking FBI that worked to create an "insurance policy" against Trump winning?

      From the same fucking FBI that withheld evidence they knew the Steele dossier was paid for by Hillary! while also being completely unverified from FISA judges in order to spy on Trump? FOUR TIMES??

      And this same FBI, in two fucking years, has NOTHING to show Trump colluded with Russia at all?

      Despite the obvious anti-Trump bias they've consistently displayed?

      THEY HAVE NOTHING

      The only thing exposed is the partisan hackery.

      Hillary! is not President!!! Trump is!!!! BWHAAAA HAAAA HAAAAAAAA!!!!!

      I hope that makes you feel like you're going to explode. I really do.

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hillary! is not President!!! Trump is!!!! BWHAAAA HAAAA HAAAAAAAA!!!!!

      I hope that makes you feel like you're going to explode. I really do.

      Oooooooh, and finally the truth comes out: Any pretension by Trumpers of caring about the law, or decency, is a facade. Trump being an accused rapist, self-confessed habitual sex predator, or traitor ringleader doesn't matter to them... They're all just dead-ender cultists in the Cult Of Stigginit. Yes, you may yet help Putin destroy American leadership of the free world, you suuuuure stuck it to us libs. We'd also be totally triggered if you stuck your dick in a venus flytrap.

      Fortunately, the Special Counsel and the seventy one sealed indictments (and counting!) he's filed don't care what you think. As much as I'm sure you'd LOVE to see the unredacted reports so Putin's gangsters could murder everyone who knew the truth...

    4. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand how investigations work do you...

      Do you really think Mueller would show all of the evidence as he gets it so Trump can destroy anything related to it?

      It takes years to bring down crime syndicates and Mueller at this time is bringing down piece by piece.

      He also needs to be careful to prevent mistrials and such.

      The fact so many people have already been taken down in this inner circle though is good evidence this is likely to succeed

    5. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Mueller's investigation was suppose to find out whether or not Trump "colluded" with Russia during the campaign. The only problem is that "collusion" is not a crime without an underlying illegal act. Even the democrats acknowledged early on that there is no evidence that Russia's actions effected the actual voting process. Even the democrats agree that so far the indictments Mueller has filed have absolutely nothing to do with Trump colluding with Russia which was the entre purpose of the investigation.

      The real investigation needed would be why did the Obama administration act on all the intelligence they had in hand 8 months before the Presidential election? They waited until after the election to publicize the information. Their reason at the time is they did not want to influence the campaign. So they had proof Russia was trying to influence the election but didn't release it because it might influence the election. Why is it that Russia is allowed to influence the election and not the US? Maybe Obama was convinced that Clinton was going to win the election so there really wasn't a big promise. Would any of the ongoing investigations ever seen the light of day if Clinton won? Would Facebook have been called to Congress to explain how their platform was used to manipulate the voters? Personally I do not think this entire matter would have pursued in any form or fashion had Clinton won.

    6. Re: Huh? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mueller's investigation was suppose to find out whether or not Trump "colluded" with Russia during the campaign

      Actually, if you look it up, the relevant excerpt is: [The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct an investigation into..]

      (b) ..
      (i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
      (ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
      (iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. 600.4(a).
      (c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.
      (d) Sections 600.4 through 600.10 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations are applicable to the Special Counsel.

      So, yeah, whatever conspiracies the president and his team joined with Russia against the USA, fall under Mueller's authorization. And also, any other crimes that you uncover while taking to witnesses or seizing evidence, which have turned out to be many. So the president's crimes, his family's crimes and his campaign staff crimes are all fair game. Trump failed to compartmentalize his criminal enterprises. Even John Gotti was a smarter crook than this fuckwit. Trump needs to watch Kansas City Confidential and Reservoir Dogs, not just Sicario.

      The only problem is that "collusion" is not a crime without an underlying illegal act.

      As you can see now, they're only interested in all the illegal acts. It was never about "collusion," since the investigations had already moved far beyond that, even before Mueller was appointed.

      Even the democrats acknowledged early on that there is no evidence that Russia's actions effected the actual voting process.

      Apparently Mueller is one of those Republican cops, who all think that if you shoot your rifle at someone and miss, you'll still be charged with assault or attempted murder. The Democrats have totally failed to get through to him. All the fucker seems to care about is fighting crime.

      (I think what's confusing you is that you've forgotten Trump's motive. Why did he conspire against America? The answer: he did it for the money. He did it to steal from America, and also to take bribes from foreign government to influence the Us government to do things for them instead of us, in any situations where our interests conflict with other countries'. He did it to help him commit further crimes against you and me. So nobody really cares whether or not Russia's help was effective. He conspired to attack America for profitable reasons, so he's going to eventually be prosecuted for the conspiracy.)

      Even the democrats agree that so far the indictments Mueller has filed have absolutely nothing to do with Trump colluding with Russia which was the entre purpose of the investigation.

      Yes. Even us non-Democrats agree to that. See item (b)(ii) and (c) above. Since so many of Trump's staff and family have committed other crimes in the attempt to cover up the conspiracy, and since they were so easily caught, they've given Mueller a gift to use, to roll them up. (Crooks don't usually make things this easy, but Mueller was fortunate to be charged with investigating some unusually stupid crooks.) The conspiracy with the Russians against America is Mueller's end game. Whether those charges will be the final charges he files, we don't know. But it's the main act, and everyone is looking forward to it. (The problem, of course, is that the president himself is one of the criminal conspirators, and sending presidents to prison is hard.)

      Personally I do not think this entire

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    7. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was not necessarily the CIA break-in that doomed Richard Nixon's Presidency, but the cover up of the original crime that resulted in Nixon leaving office in shame.

      Of course, President Trump does not seem to ever experience shame, but the attempts to cover up his crimes will certainly result in him being pursued to the ends of the Earth

      For the most part, US Federal police departments work to make examples of criminals, which are so hard that they prevent other criminals from committing the same acts.

      For example, El Chapo was not run down, tried and convicted because he lead a drug smuggling syndicate, he was hunted down because some underlings within the organization killed a US Federal Officer, Enrique Camarena.

      That act is what resulted in decades of effort to bring El Chapo down and, by example, prevent any other drug syndicate leader from allowing any of their underlings to commit a similar act.

      The burning corpse of the Trump Organization will serve a similar purpose in dissuading any other US politician from even considering working with a foreign government to win an election.

    8. Re: Huh? by Narcocide · · Score: 0

      Yea except Clinton lost because she ran on the platform of starting WW3 with Russia. So that sorta blows your entire theory.

    9. Re:Huh? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      So "Russian owned" Trump gives Cyber Command authority to take out Russians during mid-terms?
      Cunning Russian, that Trump. Get Moose and Squirrel on the case.

      Even under the most extreme theory of Trump being a Russian agent and his inner circle being in direct collaboration with Moscow he still doesn't have a lot of Pro-Russia allies in Washington.

      If he didn't grant them additional capabilities a more aggressive congressional bill probably would have shown up on his desk.

      And once the Cyber Command exists it's going to do it's thing. Trump couldn't appoint pro-Russia leadership even if he wanted to.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    10. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary! is not President!!! Trump is!!!! BWHAAAA HAAAA HAAAAAAAA!!!!!

      I hope that makes you feel like you're going to explode. I really do.

      Oooooooh, and finally the truth comes out: Any pretension by Trumpers of caring about the law, or decency, is a facade. Trump being an accused rapist, self-confessed habitual sex predator, or traitor ringleader doesn't matter to them... They're all just dead-ender cultists in the Cult Of Stigginit. Yes, you may yet help Putin destroy American leadership of the free world, you suuuuure stuck it to us libs. We'd also be totally triggered if you stuck your dick in a venus flytrap.

      Fortunately, the Special Counsel and the seventy one sealed indictments (and counting!) he's filed don't care what you think. As much as I'm sure you'd LOVE to see the unredacted reports so Putin's gangsters could murder everyone who knew the truth...

      Trump is my hero, and as a european, he just makes me laugh and laugh

      - TrumpFan

  4. Stupid facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is in no part a "national security" or otherwise strategic resource.

    1. Re:Stupid facebook by TigerPlish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      is in no part a "national security" or otherwise strategic resource.

      A single place full of people's likes and dislikes, vacation schedules, who's in their circles of friends and famlies, what car they own, where they live.. pictures and vids of all of the above and more.... none of this is strategic?

      It's very strategic, just not to the normal, well-adjusted human. But for thieves, conmen, and anyone interested in gathering intel on a target? Pricelessly strategic.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:Stupid facebook by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize that the vast majority of Facebook is fake-as-hell information

      This is an example of Sturgeon's Law: 90% of everything is crap.

      But that doesn't much diminish the value of the remaining 10%. Knowing everyone's friend graph is valuable information. Knowing everyone's interests is also valuable. Knowing who is easily influenced by the false information is very valuable.

    3. Re:Stupid facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in possession of an alphabetized list of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of almost everyone in my city who has a landline. I am willing to sell it to the highest bidder.

    4. Re:Stupid facebook by JoePete · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't the Russians or Facebook. It's the lot of us stupid Americans. Seriously, what's the difference whether the propaganda comes from the Russians or the major parties? If it is a Democrat or Republican spewing crap we call it a "debate," but if it is another country, we call it a felony?

    5. Re:Stupid facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      what's the difference whether the propaganda comes from the Russians or the major parties?

      It is both.

      A bunch of senators in one of the major parties is on Russian payroll.
      So it isn't really a difference. The Russian propaganda comes from one of the major parties.

      The funny thing is how cheap it is to buy people.
      You just have to pay them for some small thing once, then they are on the hook and have to keep following your bidding to make you not expose them.

    6. Re:Stupid facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet an endless stream of trolls, like yourself, feel a need to attack him

      In my opinion, that shows Bill to be very effective and not blathering in any sense

    7. Re:Stupid facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind operating their own 'Internet Research Agencies' such as the former 'Correct the Record' and 'Media Matters' and 'Moveon' and 'Heartland Institute'. Russian trolling operations are nothing compared to what is done by the super pacs.

    8. Re:Stupid facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, that publication you're hawking didn't have family photos, vacation schedules, or relationship maps.

  5. Let me summarize by x0ra · · Score: 1

    US build the internet to be resilient to such "attacks"
    Bad russians congregate in a central location to allegedly "attack" the US
    US get proud

    Story sounds *very* fishy... Any stupid kid can coordinate such "attacks" from all over the world.

    1. Re:Let me summarize by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      Your manner of phrasing is very typical of Russians.

    2. Re:Let me summarize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "US get proud"?? Gee, Ivan, sounds like you flunked colloquial American English at Moscow U.

    3. Re:Let me summarize by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Your manner of phrasing is very typical of Russians.

      I was thinking Polandball...

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    4. Re:Let me summarize by x0ra · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm well infiltrated in your society then, comrade Shaitan... Wait... "Shaitan"... that sound Chinese, you spy bastard !

    5. Re:Let me summarize by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Fine, seppo three letter agencies, brag about giant bloody nothing burger, taking down a Russian click bait farm. The messages nothing but bait to get people to click and serve up the actual message, an add for some crappy product, for which they make money, meanwhile across the internet, tens of thousands of click bait farms most of them in the fbloody US continue on merrily. Next we will have claims of holistic Russian espionage agents, who with no contact to Russia, do most the, well, what ever bullshit the seppo three letter agencies come up with (The government of the USA, the Union of Shitty Arseholes, you seppos really need to do something about the corruption in your government, it is becoming embarrassingly public, your pollies are becoming dags on a sheeps butt and you lot are the sheep).

      Russian enough for yah.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Let me summarize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Shaitan means the Devil (Satan) if you translate.

    7. Re:Let me summarize by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      Nope, can't hear a Russian accent when reading that at all. Much better.

  6. Interbomb them back to dialup! by bigmacx · · Score: 2

    Now that the binawar is won, let's welcome home our digital warriors. Sunglasses for all!

    1. Re:Interbomb them back to dialup! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that the binawar is won, let's welcome home our digital warriors. Sunglasses for all!

      Too bad the only positions the VA jobs placement program can get BinaWar I vets is as content monitors for Facebook. We'll be dealing with the fallout of these brave warriors' PTSD for decades to come.

  7. Just remember, kids... by null+etc. · · Score: 0, Troll

    Trump doesn't believe in intelligence.

    1. Re:Just remember, kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      To be fair, intelligence doesn't believe in Trump either.

    2. Re:Just remember, kids... by jarle.aase · · Score: 1

      He believe he is intelligent, so he is excused.

  8. Perhaps.. by x0ra · · Score: 1

    the Russians should buy Huawei equipment and not Cisco...

  9. Republicans don't give a by pablo_max · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Republicans don't seem to care at all about this, since the russians helped their team win.
    I thought they were the "our guns protect your freedom" patriots who love 'murica so much?
    Small minded Republicans, ask yourselves, why would Putin want Trump to win? Is it because he loves you and loves 'Murica?
    Maybe, just maybe there is a different reason. Maybe he knows something you don't.
    Of course, should the democrats win in the next election, I am pretty sure the world will hear you screaming your disingenuous little hearts out about how the Russians hacked the elections and how the results are not valid and blah blah blah. Why? Because you are pieces of shit who don't care about the US, or the world at large. You only care that your teams wins, regardless of what it costs every other person on the planet.

    1. Re:Republicans don't give a by rickb928 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Democrats have never been accused of outsourcing election fraud.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Republicans don't give a by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0, Troll

      Republicans don't seem to care at all about this, since the russians helped their team win. I thought they were the "our guns protect your freedom" patriots who love 'murica so much? Small minded Republicans, ask yourselves, why would Putin want Trump to win? Is it because he loves you and loves 'Murica? Maybe, just maybe there is a different reason. Maybe he knows something you don't. Of course, should the democrats win in the next election, I am pretty sure the world will hear you screaming your disingenuous little hearts out about how the Russians hacked the elections and how the results are not valid and blah blah blah. Why? Because you are pieces of shit who don't care about the US, or the world at large. You only care that your teams wins, regardless of what it costs every other person on the planet.

      Well then ... I'm glad that with you, we won't have all that awful "discord", lol Just sweet harmony.

      (BTW, Democrats lovedy-loved-loved Russia right up until it stopped being the most murderous communist dictatorship ever. As someone not born five minutes ago, I find this new Red scare super entertaining.)

    3. Re:Republicans don't give a by Penguinisto · · Score: 1, Troll

      Republicans don't seem to care at all about this, since the russians helped their team win.

      You'd think there would be evidence of this somewhere... after all, There's been an independent counsel running for around two years now, and so far they've found approximately bupkis (well, they found a pack of Russkies who bought $100k of Facebook ads, and a couple of idiots who got roped into pleading to unrelated process crimes... but strangely enough, no actual evidence of Russkie-Trump collusatory involvement, let alone electoral hacking of any kind...)

      Guess we'll find out for certain in a week or three once that report comes out, but in all honesty, if there were evidence that didn't sit firmly in fever-ridden and overstretched speculation, it would have come out long, long before now. I'm willing to be wrong, though. Question is, are the Donks?

      I am curious though - what will a lot of the media do with the news, given that they've often breathlessly preached that impeachment/removal of the president '...is just around the corner - any day now!' from a man (Mueller) whom they painted as some sort of avenging angel to smite OrangeMan to the Outer Pits of Hell (or Nebraska, whichever is closer), etc...

      But then, I believe I can already see the narrative shaping up for that as well, given the (newly Democrat) House Judiciary Committee's ramping up of a possible subpoena (and investigation/prosecution?) of the independent counsel, who in turn seems about to fail at delivering what the Democrats were hoping for so badly... It's almost like they have no clue what an independent counsel actually is or does...

      Either way, my shipment of popcorn (and a spare microwave to make big batches of it) should arrive before the end of the week, so if Mueller can hold out for at least that long....

      So, bring the knee-jerk down-mods, but you know I'm right, campers.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re: Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would "those types" be encouraged whether or not you, some dumb twit, pays attention or not? They didn't even give their names. You wouldn't know them if you saw them. The information is however valid.

      If valid information is something you actively avoid, maybe you should consider being a Republican? It's their MO to the T.

    5. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Meanwhile, Clinton literally rigged the DNC primary to steal it from Sanders.
      That is according to the DNC chair at the time, Donna Brazil.

      But don't let ACTUAL PROVABLE election fraud interfere with your rant that there is no evidence of. Or are you going to quote Clapper and Brennen, both proven liars under oath to Congress to refute me?

    6. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why? Because you are pieces of shit who don't care about the US, or the world at large. You only care that your teams wins, regardless of what it costs every other person on the planet.

      A lot of them believe the planet is going to be cleansed by God with fire. Why should they give a shit if it's a little hotter and dirtier when that happens?

      Yes, they seriously believe this.

    7. Re: Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herm it seems to me, one example is politics and the other is a crime. As defined by law.

    8. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans don't seem to care at all about this, since the russians helped their team win.
      I thought they were the "our guns protect your freedom" patriots who love 'murica so much?
      Small minded Republicans, ask yourselves, why would Putin want Trump to win? Is it because he loves you and loves 'Murica?
      Maybe, just maybe there is a different reason. Maybe he knows something you don't.
      Of course, should the democrats win in the next election, I am pretty sure the world will hear you screaming your disingenuous little hearts out about how the Russians hacked the elections and how the results are not valid and blah blah blah. Why? Because you are pieces of shit who don't care about the US, or the world at large. You only care that your teams wins, regardless of what it costs every other person on the planet.

      How is this Score: 4 insightful?

      How did Russian's "hack" the election? lol Why are you not upset that Russia gave Hillary and the Clinton Foundation over $120 million dollars? Double standard much? Ah, can't take you serious, or any other liberal at this point. It truly is a mental disorder.

    9. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the Q team says, "Anyone on the Liberal side currently running for President is trying to protect themselves." Get your popcorn ready. Show will be starting in 2020. Just need to clear out a few more Obama-era judges to cleanse the Judicial. Can't have any Deep State actors still embedded.

      LoL @ Liberal hypocrisy on this /.

    10. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Republicans don't seem to care at all about this, since the russians helped their team win.

      A) I don't think it helped them win, it was mostly nonsense like Jesus arm wrestling Satan. You might think I'm kidding, but no, that was literally one of the examples given of the evil Russian memes. So you'll have to explain how posting Jesus arm wrestling Satan online helped the Republicans win. I'm waiting. Oh, maybe you mean the emails? Well, the only part that affected my vote was learning all the illegal things they were up to, you know, like quid-pro-quo with the WaPo party, classification doesn't matter (and let's ask various departments to reclassify things to get us out of trouble), hey, let's collude with Colin Powell to violate the Presidential Records Act in an email, etc. Ooops, wait, the Colin Powell emails came from the FBI investigation, not Russia or any other hackers! Oops.

      B) It's speech on the internet. If you say that political speech from other countries needs to be blocked, then why are you going on about the Steele dossier? He's a British spy and it's more likely to influence elections than silly memes about Jesus and Satan. It's ironic that in talking about hypocrisy you ignore this.

      > I thought they were the "our guns protect your freedom" patriots who love 'murica so much?

      That's a non-sequitur because freedom of speech, including speech that's wrong or disagreeable, is enshrined in our Constitution.

      > Small minded Republicans, ask yourselves, why would Putin want Trump to win? Is it because he loves you and loves 'Murica?

      I don't give a crap about Putin, and I don't believe he helped him win. I note that you always make assumptions about how other people voted, without bothering to listen to those of us who voted for Trump (or, more precisely, against Hillary).

      > Maybe, just maybe there is a different reason. Maybe he knows something you don't.

      That Hillary is owned by China? Yes, he's looking out for himself. I'm down with condemning him for, say, poisoning people. I'm not down with saying that Russians can't post about US politics online, or saying that all political speech must be true. If you want the last one, you have to let me decide what is or isn't true. If you won't, you expose the fundamental problem with that.

      > Of course, should the democrats win in the next election, I am pretty sure the world will hear you screaming your disingenuous little hearts out about how the Russians hacked the elections and how the results are not valid and blah blah blah. Why?

      Well, Mueller has worked with Oleg Deirpaksa, despite their attempts to throw him under the bus as well, I mean, your Steele of the Steele dossier worked for him. And they gave Mr. Pedo Island Epstein quite a deal, though he's connected to a lot of people (including some random Trump appointee, Bill & Hillary, and even Trump flew one random flight, albeit not to Pedo Island like Bill).

      But no, I don't plan on saying that unless there's actual evidence thereof. Something you guys haven't really produced. Instead, your collusion theory looks something like:

      1) Russian bots posted memes online
      2) ???
      3) Trump wins!

      > Because you are pieces of shit who don't care about the US, or the world at large. You only care that your teams wins, regardless of what it costs every other person on the planet.

      I do care.

      But the planet is screwed, the only question is when and how miserable we make each other in the mean time. Maybe it's later when the sun expands enough to fry the Earth, maybe it's earlier when it gets nuked or whatever, I dunno. Actually, there are a lot of things that will eventually screw over life on Earth, including asteroids, etc. Just hopefully none of those happen any time especially soon and maybe we can make things last a bit longer. I don't want to screw over the planet, I live here, dumbass.

      Besides, you're moralizing the problems, that's an anti-pattern for actually solving them. Sadly, it's by design, politicians have convinced you that your survival is dependent on them protecting you from your political enemies to control you. Yes, they do that to all of us. I wish it didn't work so well but it does.

    11. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Russian hold a gun to your head at the polls. No.

    12. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why is US so concerned about what the other side is trying to do to the american voter? I'd assume the voter can makeup their own mind just fine. Moreover, how is this any different than the US interfering in other countries elections since they always make it well known who they support hint!hint! pick this person. They also fund their campaigns covertly and directly by stating here's some money to help you in addition supplying crude information the gov. collects and gives to their contender. Moreover, the US broadcasts Voice of America over the airwaves to also influence a countries citizens.

      A good example of this is Argentina. The US stating we don't like you, so we'll cut trade and limit finances by sanctions, then publicly state who we really want and get the rest of the worlds buy-in. Also to speed things along, here's some free food as a donation to get the population on the side we like.

      So in the end the US is no different than those they are trying to scream about for trying to influence the voter population. It's all about disinformation warfare. I'm surprised the US hasn't gone back to air dropping leaflets on the mass population - but that is outdated when its cheaper just to send out SPAM emails to everyone (direct marketing).......

    13. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Democrats have never been accused of outsourcing election fraud.

      No, they're quite competent at it all by themselves. (Hello Chicago!)

    14. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Never forget this

      - people who voted for obama both times stayed at home for hillary
      - hillary got less of the female vote than obama
      - hillary lost WI to bernie then never visited it again
      - in the close of the election hillary was pushing in red states shed never win
      - in battleground states hillary had a very weak / non existent campaign

      Hillary lost because they decided to do campaign different than Obama or Bill Clinton.

      Hillary lost because they relied on Big Data but the data was wrong and never double checked.

      Hillary lost because they assumed everyone who voted for Obama would also vote for Hillary.

      But now all they want you to think of is RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA!

      Dont trust me - Google all this for yourself.

    15. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of them believe the planet is going to be cleansed by God with fire. Why should they give a shit if it's a little hotter and dirtier when that happens?

      Yes, they seriously believe this.

      Who are these people?
      Because there isn't any significant denomination of Christianity that believes this at all.
      Is it some Hindu or Muslim belief?

    16. Re:Republicans don't give a by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      The data was right. They just misinterpreted it because they were arrogant. You're right about the rest of it.

    17. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL -1 because truth hurts? Go moderators go... just go in fact..

    18. Re:Republicans don't give a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off idiot

      Such a well crafted and articulated argument

  10. In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are blocking memes from spreading on social media. This gives the moderators time to smoke weed and have sex in the hallways.

  11. Re:LIBERALS LOL by halivar · · Score: 2

    "under new authorities it was granted by President Trump and Congress"

  12. Nice Attempt... by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but most of the damage is done in the weeks leading up to the election. Shutting them down on election day is too late.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Nice Attempt... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Depends - are we talking social-media influence, or are we talking about modifying actual votes/ballots? The latter could be more easily hidden on Election Day during the crush of votes cast then (and in some cases, such as Oregon which uses computer-counted mail-in paper votes, it's likely the only day you could get any such thing done...)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  13. Doscord?? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    The U.S. military blocked Internet access to an infamous Russian entity seeking to sow discord among Americans during the 2018 midterms

    Discord?!? We can't have discord during ... democratic elections!

    Thank God our crack troops protected the motherla ... I mean, baseball and apple pie, from ... {shudder} ... discord!

    1. Re:Doscord?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In much the same way Rotten Tomatoes is protecting movies from bad reviews.

      Can't have discord. Step in line, citizen, or I will call you racist again.

  14. "An Oligarch close to" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oligarch is a stupid buzzword that hacks throw into a non-story to make it sound spookier.

    Elon Musk, an oligarch connected to Trump, ....

    Jeff Bezos, an oligarch close to the Trump Administration...

    Warren Buffet, an oligarch with ties to the Obama Foundation..

    Mark Zuckerberg, an oligarch connected to Isreal

    1. Re:"An Oligarch close to" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now can see the stupid Slashdot moderators.
      That comment is not troll but informative.

      Oligarchs are people, who use their money to gain influence and to gain favorable laws by giving money to senators, judges and lawmakers.

  15. On the day of? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    How timely. Sure, it's an important day, but the days leading up were also important...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Re:LIBERALS LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uh oh spaghettios it looks like it's contagious, you should have yourself checked out.

  17. "tired narritive" doesn't begin to describe it. by Iamthecheese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know why I bother, since you're clearly determined. Stop pushing political narratives. Hell, this would even be worth discussing if it weren't the thousandth article pushing "Russia hacked the elections". The ironic thing is your side has so thoroughly discredited itself that when you have real news that supports your cause it is going to be ignored. I don't even like Trump!

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  18. Speaking On Condition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of anonymity as someone who is close to Russian trolls. This really hurts bad. I hope you get a suspiciously vague amount of satisfaction from knowing that something somewhere may have happened according to someone that hurt the Russians.

  19. The US considers cyber attacks an act of war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would like to remind everyone that the the US would consider the same done to them as an act of war which would justify a military response, up to and including a nuclear strike.

  20. Re:Republicans don't give a treasonous fake tear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Almost all of the cases of fraud we've heard about this cycle have been GOP fraud involving hiring consultants to "help" people fill out and cast their ballots, often without their consent or knowledge and obviously illegally so.

    https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/the-tearful-drama-of-north-carolinas-election-fraud-hearings

  21. Doesn't pass the sniff test by guruevi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A bit more detail would be nice. Did they shut down the Internet on Russian territory? Probably not, that'd be some hot potato if they were found. If they blocked the IP on the US-side, there are plenty of proxies both in and out of the US to work through.

    Either these trolls are very stupid and don't know anything about how the Internet works or this is just another story about how someone blocked an IP address and thinks they saved the world.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Doesn't pass the sniff test by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      A bit more detail would be nice. Did they shut down the Internet on Russian territory? Probably not, that'd be some hot potato if they were found. If they blocked the IP on the US-side, there are plenty of proxies both in and out of the US to work through.

      We've seen plenty of cases where power failures, bugs, script kiddies, or downright stupidity or apathy have brought major companies to a standstill. If any organization could undertake a successful, targeted attack on the internet and networking structure of a specific company without collateral damage, it would be the NSA.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Doesn't pass the sniff test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was thinking they deployed a broken AS to BGP myself.

  22. Traitor apologist excuses from Republican faggots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "and don't take a cell phone anywhere that might be considered shady." - And if you're going to launder money for the Russian mob for 30 years, lol don't let your "fixer" lawyer guy record your voice talking about it for 15 years. Fucking moron.

    A little bit of opsec and these Alfabank betas might have gotten away with it! A LITTLE BIT! "Russia, if you're listening..." - Seriously. Roger Stone now accepting rogering, will sing for lube. The whole treason is falling apart.

    And why? BECAUSE HE PICKED A FIGHT WITH A PORN STAR. Let's just count the hundreds of times Trump has fucked himself, it's almost impossible to contain them all in your mind at one time. In his own WORDS a traitor!

    We should be pitchforking his ass RIGHT NOW, instead you're making false equivocations and excuses for a known traitor. YOU ARE BECOME THE TRAITOR.

  23. Guruevi the shit-smelling pedo knows nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey "Guru" Evi, why don't we play a game? You make retarded obviously-wrong-on-their-face assumptions and assertions, and people who know at all about this because they read about this will just laugh at your retarded lack of chops, moron.

  24. "Penguinisto" the faggot traitor can't read I gues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol. Russians have been charged, Manafort and others have been convicted, gone to prison for this. Are you such a retarded traitor that you're pretending you forgot how to read too? Suck Roger Stone's cock in prison you treasonous faggot.

  25. When will you demand Obama apologize then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If Russia is so bad, when are you going to demand Barack Obama apologize for demonizing Mitt Romney for daring to call Russia an adversary to the US?

    Or are you just going to memory-hole that?

    1. Re:When will you demand Obama apologize then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Demonizing? He said Romney was a fool who sat on both sides of the fence he was using to pretend he was "hard" on foreign affairs. And Obama was right about that. Romney's spine is a windvane.

      At that point Putin wasn't President, Medvedev was. It "appeared" Russia was opening up at that time, seeking business accords. Putin's machinations put the kaibosh on that, which came shortly after in Crimea, etc.

      How do you Trumptard traitor apologists forget history in so few years? Do you take Trump-branded stupid pills?

    2. Re:When will you demand Obama apologize then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He peddles the same brand he takes. Explains how he contradicts himself within the same Tweet even.

  26. Re:Republicans don't get educated anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually Uranium One was more Republicans than Democrats, and not illegal. Don't let facts get in the way of a good yarn though, pizzagate traitor faggot apologist Fox Tards. Say hi to Putin's cock for us, traitor Republicans. Kiss it.

    Putin's cock runs your party now.

  27. Re:Republicans don't give a treasonous fake tear by rickb928 · · Score: 0

    You may have missed a few.

    Of course, it would seem there's hardly any reason to suspect this, right?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  28. Re:Republicans don't get educated anymore. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    'not illegal'.

    So we've finally abandoned the fiction of 'the appearance of impropriety'.

    Good. Multimillion dollar contributions, tens of thousands of dollars in speaking fees, certainly not illegal except by a strict reading of the law.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  29. Re:LIBERALS LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see your 4/8chan and raise you. FYI, JFK, the Trilateral Commission, the Masons, the Bilderberg group, the Illuminati, even the Magnetic Pole Shift machine operators and the group that controls the sunspot seeding satellites, they all take orders from the Johnson Duality -- a secret lifeform composed of former presidents Andrew Johnson and Richard Nixon who's physical being is kept alive by chemicals and a constant bath of embryonic fluid in an secret underground bunker beneath the Infowars studio near Austin TX.

  30. Re:Republicans don't give a treasonous fake tear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    " Thursday, October 18, 2018 " "If true there will be serious consequences,” he said. - And nothing was found. I guess you'll have to try harder to equivocate, GOP fraudster.

    Last week, the North Carolina Board of Elections, confronted with evidence of widespread election fraud, ordered a new election in North Carolina’s 9th congressional district. Local officials didn’t have much of a choice: both parties agree there was a Republican operation that appears to have engaged in fraudulent and illegal activity.

    It was against this backdrop that Donald Trump had very little to say on the subject. On Friday afternoon, a reporter asked the president whether he was prepared to condemn his own party’s election fraud in North Carolina. His answer was a mess.

    TRUMP: Well, I condemn any election fraud. And when I look at what’s happened in California with the votes, when I look at what happened – as you know, there was just a case where they found a million fraudulent votes. When I look at what’s happened in Texas –

    Q: There haven’t been any cases –

    TRUMP: Excuse me. Excuse me. When I look at what’s happened in Texas. When I look at that catastrophe that took place in Florida where the Republican candidates kept getting less and less and less and less. And fortunately, Rick Scott and Ron ended up winning their election, but it was disgraceful what happened there.

    So I look at a lot of different places all over the country. I condemn any voter fraud of any kind, whether it’s Democrat or Republican – or when you look at some of the things that happened in California, in particular. When you look at what’s happened in Texas with all of those votes that they recently found were not exactly properly done, I condemn all of it. And that includes North Carolina, if anything – you know, I guess they’re going to be doing a final report. But I’d like to see the final report. But any form of election fraud, I condemn.

    If we were to rank Trump’s lies on an offensiveness scale, his ridiculous claims about election fraud would have to be among the most exasperating.

    Let’s take these one at a time:

    * There is literally no evidence to support the assertion that a million illegal ballots were cast in California. It’s absurd. There’s a right-wing Facebook post that’s circulating among conspiracy theorists that apparently served as the basis for the presidential nonsense, but there’s no reason anyone should take it seriously.

    * Trump’s reference to “what’s happened in Texas” is likely about the Texas secretary of state’s office alleging that roughly 95,000 non-citizens may be on the state’s voter rolls. It soon became obvious that the list included naturalized citizens, and the whole initiative quickly became something of a joke.

    * The president pointed to election results in Florida, where his far-right allies prevailed, but where their margins shrunk as more votes were tallied. Trump considers this “disgraceful.” In reality, the only “disgrace” is the voter purge Rick Scott’s (R) administration orchestrated ahead of the election, and the evidence that suggests Bill Nelson (D) would’ve been in a position to win were it not for incompetent election management in Broward County.

    But as important as these details are, they’re only part of the larger problem with Trump’s rhetoric on Friday.

    Confronted with actual evidence of his party engaging in election fraud, Trump quickly tried to change the subject to voter fraud, pointing to examples that are fictional.

    It wasn’t just a matter of partisan convenience: the president needs the public to believe voter fraud (which isn’t the same thing as election fraud) is a real scou

  31. Re:Republicans don't get educated anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's nothing illegal about either contributions or speaking fees if there's no actual quid pro quo, as there was apparently not in the Uranium One deal, which involved no fewer than 12 government agency sign-offs on the merits.

    That's obviously quite different than Trump now facing over 200 felonies in 48 states for his fraudulent charity operation, fraudulent University program, unpaid illegal laborer recruitment, and collusion with Russian Intel to sabotage 2016 elections.

    When Trump dies in prison maybe you'll understand how these are not equivocal, but I doubt it. Your head is wedged in there pretty good, if you fart you could blow your brains competely out. Hold it in, gassy GOP traitor.

    The rope is coming, hang in there.

  32. Republicans get the rope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Trump must accept the valid election results!" - Well, they probably meant without using Putin's hacker teams or illegal in-kind contributions, both felonies for old Dunnold. He'll die in prison, the fucking moron. Oh well.

    And nothing of value was lost when the GOP turned traitor and disintegrated as a valid party.

    As an independent myself, it's going to be hilarious when Trump hangs. I bet Obama will golf a lot more after Trump dies, just to rub it in a bit for Trump's treasonous inbred faggot authoritarian apologist followers.

    They don't understand how this works yet lol.

  33. Re:Republicans don't get educated anymore. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    What 200 felonies? Really?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  34. The army blocks internet for us not to discord? by Pirulo · · Score: 1

    US Army had to interfere with the internet traffic so to avoid Americans not to enter into discord due to fake news. It is presented as a good thing that just happened. Americans lost any little left discerning capabality and now the military is tasked with protecting their thoughts. We are at the bottom already.

  35. takes time by Comboman · · Score: 1

    Proxies take time and resources to set up, which is likely why the disruption happened on election day and not weeks before, so they wouldn't have time to respond.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:takes time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incredible point of view. So Russian propaganda facility is assumed to have less IT skill then a small internet shop?
      In any case this is meaningless news. Russian internet agents are not campaign workers and don't need to wait for the election date for a "final push".

    2. Re:takes time by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I can set up about 10 proxies in less than an hour. If I script it and with control over something these "russian hackers" also supposedly have state-side control over - massive international botnets - I could probably get a proxy deep into one or another military or government contractor network.

      Seriously, look up "setting up SSH tunneling" or SOCKS proxy. You can go to any modern 'cloud' provider and spin up a few thousand instances across the globe in seconds.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  36. Re:LIBERALS LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see your infowars and raise you. The Patriarchy is the one behind them all.

  37. So now its an oligarch? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    Not GRU? Still got Bear?
    U.S. Cyber Command went up against an oligarch and not the GRU?
    Notice the magical way classified information gets to the media?
    Why are we reading about classified information in real time?
    If it was a real NSA mission that would stay secret for decades.
    So historian would mention an accept of such a mission it in 40-50 years with approval.
    No US gov/mil would tell any other nation of how it likes to do its cyber and what was done.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  38. Re:GOP faggot whines about Russian interference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy Trump's second term, soy boy!

  39. Re: "tired narritive" doesn't begin to describe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The operation marked the first muscle-flexing by U.S. Cyber Command, with intelligence from the National Security Agency, under new authorities it was granted by President Trump and Congress last year to bolster offensive capabilities.

    What narrative? Go back to Moscow, really.

  40. HACK THE PLANET! HOW I HACKED PUTIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yesterday i was sitting home eating my doritos when i noticed some activity on my internets. i quickly typed in some perl one-liners into my pi ssh and noticed we were being invaded by RUSSIANS! i typed some more one-liners, this time using awk, sed and a combination of some core utils and i shut down the RUSSIAN invasion! i saved the internet and nobody knows. i'm only mentioning this so you know there are people like me who are watching out for you. you're welcome, billy. you're welcome.

    1. Re:HACK THE PLANET! HOW I HACKED PUTIN! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      That's some mighty fine cybering.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  41. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Is there a difference?

    No.

  42. Re:LIBERALS LOL by cwatts · · Score: 1

    And he's doing all this at the spry young age of 101... Uh huh. /s

    --
    chris watts íë¦ìS ì(TM)ì