Slashdot Mirror


Choose Your Representatives On the Open Source Initiative Board (opensource.org)

Bruce Perens writes: The Open Source Initiative is holding an election for 6 board seats. We shouldn't have an election without a policy debate! Even if you aren't an OSI member, you can (and should) ask questions of the candidates. To do so, go to the election site, register on the wiki, and then enter questions at the bottom of each candidate's statement. The XWiki syntax is here.

33 comments

  1. No need to register by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been informed that it is not necessary to register on the Wiki, and you can post comments anonymously. Uh-oh. Might be a lot of work for the OSI admin tomorrow. Please be gentle to him and post serious questions to the candidates.

    1. Re: No need to register by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymity is for, well, a conversation stopper for any serious discussions

    2. Re:No need to register by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4chan is going to have a field day with this.

    3. Re:No need to register by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Do they allow kids to vote?

  2. Darl McBride write in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets make it happen! For the luls.

    1. Re: Darl McBride write in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      No just no. Anonymity is a clusterfuck

    2. Re:Darl McBride write in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh hell yes! He's been part of the open source story for so long he's basically family!

  3. OSI is a waste by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The OSI organization is a failure and has ruined the Free Software movement. The entire organization should be abandoned. We had a chance to make Free Software free forever and we blew it. Now Open Source is being used to monitor and sell us out to the mega corporations. And there is nothing we can do about it because we gave it away with "corporate friendly" OSI efforts.

    1. Re:OSI is a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The OSI organization is a failure and has ruined the Free Software movement. The entire organization should be abandoned. We had a chance to make Free Software free forever and we blew it. Now Open Source is being used to monitor and sell us out to the mega corporations. And there is nothing we can do about it because we gave it away with "corporate friendly" OSI efforts.

      Furthermore, the source 'contributed' by the corporations often come with MASSIVE STRINGS ATTACHED , making them not truly open source, nor allowing us to use them on our own projects !!

      I thank Bruce for informing us of the OSI election, like ICANN (once an organization open for all Netizens), OSI's priority is for those with power and influences.

    2. Re:OSI is a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      problem is, free software has been betrayed by it's own advocates because of their own inability to grasp they are being played for free work by corporations

    3. Re:OSI is a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there is nothing we can do about it because we gave it away with "corporate friendly" OSI efforts.

      Free Software was tainted right from the beginning. The GNU Compiler Collection quite easily could have had terms such that the resulting binaries had to be under a free software license but in order to gain popularity Stallman abandoned his morals and allowed and it to be used to create all manner of freedom-disrespecting software.

    4. Re:OSI is a waste by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Stallman abandoned his morals and allowed and it to be used to create all manner of freedom-disrespecting software.

      Do your homework. They did think it through. It's essentially an application of Freedom Zero.

  4. What is this nerds take back Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linking Syntax is normal, I thought we were talking about bullshit that takes all our money and uses everything we worked on.

  5. Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kick out all those authoritarian regressive freaks who defend safe spaces and codes of conduct.

    1. Re:Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      AMEN TO THAT! The abnormal monstrosities and aberrations don't realize something. They are the freaks and think they have power? They exist at our leniency and mercy only to expose you can't give them a leg up or they abuse it. Lets use fags as an example. They claim it is not a physical problem. I would argue it is. Perhaps too much testosterone during the development process of a female creates a homosexual male. They say it is NOT this so it must be mental. Abnormal mental. Sex is for procreation. Can a male and another male make another human being? No. They are fucked in the head and prove it on that alone saying homosexuality is NOT a physical problem so thus it must be mental (proving they are fucked in the head and abnormal aberrations). You can't help them. Their abnormal brains interpret it as "we have the power now" and nutjobs you NEVER did, ever. The rest of us normal folks learned a lesson here. Don't ever give them a chance. It's giving mentally fucked loons a chance.

    2. Re: Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Lap dog

    3. Re:Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing our luck, they will try and put Steve Shives on the board.
      We should write in Sargon of Akkad to the board!

    4. Re:Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      I still need to check for cucks among the men, but I just did a quick audit of the women on the list and here's what I've come up with so far. First their names, then my personal "threat rating" (lower means less likely to be SJW, higher means stay the fuck away), then my reasons for why I gave said rating.

      Carol Smith (1/10): Works for Microsoft, otherwise doesn't seem that bad.

      Christine Hall (3/10): Journalist for 47 years. No other overt signs of trouble, but that alone has me worried.

      Mariatta Wijaya (8/10): Wrote some kind of "CoC hotline" software for a project with a shitty CoC.

      Elana Hashman (1/10): Had to give one point of *potential* caution due to being a Debianite. No other overt signs of trouble.

      Molly de Blanc: (10/10): Running for re-election. Member of Outreachy's Anti-harassment team. VOTE THIS BITCH OFF THE ISLAND AT ALL COSTS.

      Pamela Chestek: (0/10): Yeah, she's a copyright lawyer, but she's on our side. She's also wearing an oversized hot dog hat, thus making her a shoe-in for the coolest woman on the list, hands down.

    5. Re:Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      I missed one.

      Hong Phuc Dang (1/10): I kinda wish she'd dispense with the "I am representing women in tech" crap and stand on her own merits, but otherwise doesn't seem too much trouble.

    6. Re: Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually a great idea.

    7. Re: Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      It is as long as he is no SJW penis sucker described here logically proven mentally abnormal/aberrant https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    8. Re:Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      You'll always be a nothing faggot lol

    9. Re:Kick out the SJWs by sheramil · · Score: 1

      I didn't realise Command and Conquer needed a hotline. It seemed fairly straightforward.

    10. Re:Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      this is a really nice list. But careful. There might be also men in this SJW mode.

      I totally agree on the "VOTE THIS BITCH OFF THE ISLAND AT ALL COSTS."

      This should be about Free Software and it has become about lets' waste all our time debating about
      the overly sensitive person that got hurt because somebody looked at him/her in the wrong way.

    11. Re:Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      And one more...

      Kate Stewart (?/10): Hasn't filled out anything in her profile. How lazy.

    12. Re:Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      My goodness, how progressive of you. I'm sure your peer group is impressed.

    13. Re:Kick out the SJWs by The+Vorlon · · Score: 1

      Only 1 point awarded for being a Debian Developer? You've badly misjudged. Our next release will include a click-through license that requires all you idiot men's rights activists to marry your dogs as a condition of using the software.

      Can't handle codes of conduct that obligate you to behave like a decent human being? Suck it up, snowflake.

    14. Re: Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any condition placed on the Four Freedoms is abhorrent and should be rejected on principle.

    15. Re:Kick out the SJWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. I awarded only one point because Debian's dev team is fucking enormous and spans the globe. I wanted to give some benefit of the doubt in case she wasn't one of "those people". There's still plenty of good people contributing to projects that have been otherwise polluted with CoCs and SJWs and other assorted filth. The Linux kernel is one such project.

      If Debian's dev team were a tiny room with only six people in it, then fuck, sure, I'd give a 9/10 or a 10/10 because you obviously wouldn't be welcome in that room without drinking the kool-aid first, but we're talking about a very, very large group of people, here.

      And wait... did you just call me a snowflake, whilst defending codes of conduct? I thought my brain was hurting from too much Jack Daniel's... nope, it was you who did that. AmiMojo, I think you're logged into the wrong account.

    16. Re:Kick out the SJWs by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Kick out all those authoritarian regressive freaks who defend safe spaces and codes of conduct.

      "Anonymous Coward" never seemed more appropriate...

  6. Resist social just-us nazism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free Software developers of the world, open your eyes! Our communities are being raped, our work pillaged.

    Detestable villains - thieving, mean spirited, belligerent, racist, unprincipled - are using underhanded tricks to force hypocritical "Codes of Conduct" on the projects we built.

    These petty-authoritarian CoCs are always imposed anti-democratically. There is never free debate, and usually no public discussion at all. They are imposed by force without a vote. If the CoCs were put up for a fair democratic vote by project contributors, they would always lose by a landslide.

    The purpose of these CoCs is to allow social activists, who have contributed nothing to the project, to conduct witch hunts against anyone who opposes their hate-driven agenda. Thereby they plan to steal our work for their shadowy corporate paymasters.

    You can readily tell these CoCs are not about "just being nice" - because they are ALWAYS supported by the very LEAST NICE, most aggressively mean and shamelessly bigoted people you can imagine. Look how the CoC-mongers treat anyone who disagrees with them as subhuman.

    If a project to which you contribute has been raped by CoC-mongers there is a simple solution: WALK AWAY. Never contribute again. If you have a patch almost ready, count the time you spent on it as a loss and throw it away. If you see a security issue, remain silent and do nothing. IT'S NO LONGER YOUR PROJECT. YOU ARE NOT WELCOME THERE.

    If you are evaluating new software, don't even consider any projects burdened under the tyranny of a CoC. Their technical attributes do not matter - just don't consider them. Never be openly political, always make up a technical reason for rejecting CoCed projects.

    Don't argue in public about the CoC. Doing so only exposes you to needless risk. You might be dis-employed, blackballed, and even set up for a #MeToo purge. Just stay far away. If you resign from a project that gets CoCed, try to do so on the same day the CoC is imposed. But give "spend more time with friends & family" or "pursue other interests & projects" as your reason for resignation. Protect yourself!

    Comrades: Individually we are powerless, and easily crushed beneath the iron boot of Corporate Social Just-Us. But together in solidarity we are millions and we are strong. The Internet itself depends on our collective labor. If we stop working, the internet stops working.

    Free Software developers, save yourselves and save your communities! Just WALK AWAY from any project with a CoC. Without our labor they are nothing.

  7. Screw them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run my own open source initiative, and so can you.

  8. No SJC's and No COC's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    The social justice cult likes to vote people onto boards and use it to create a foot hold through COC's. They'll then use the COC to kick anyone who dares do something as horrible as *gasp* disagreeing with a Womxn. Especially a Womxn of ColourTM. Mertiocricy is the only thing that matters in FOSS.