Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Teases Hiding 'Likes' and 'Retweets' Counts, Color-Coded Replies in Biggest Set of Changes To Its Social Media Service Since it Launched in 2006 (nbcnews.com)

Twitter is teasing some of the biggest changes to its social media service since it first launched in 2006, aiming to make good on the company's promise to promote "healthy conversation." From a report: The company is also introducing new features to enhance pictures and video on the app in an effort to encourage users to make more use of the cameras on their smartphones, a move that adds features similar to those found on the apps of some of its main competition: Instagram and Snapchat. "We've really intentionally tried to make the images and footage that are captured on the ground at an event look different than other images and videos that you might attach to a tweet," said Keith Coleman, Twitter's head of consumer product. On Tuesday, the company offered the public its first look at a new prototype for the Twitter app, which the company is calling "twttr" in a nod to CEO and co-founder Jack Dorsey's first tweet, that includes a variety of changes to how Twitter looks and operates, centered on a new format for conversations and color-coded replies. The prototype also removes the engagement counts showing the number of retweets or "likes" a tweet receives. This change is designed to make Twitter a little friendlier.

48 comments

  1. Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    You mean the platform that the orange traitor uses to yell at the porn stars he used campaign funds to buy off, illegally? That bullshit right? Who gives a fuck.

    1. Re:Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ORANGE MAN BAD

      You people are such parodies of even the most absurd characterizations.

    2. Re: Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh the famous vaunted democuck fallacy. Blame trump.

      Not to be outdone by the repubtard fallacy.

    3. Re:Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for clarification has anyone put forward allegations that campaign funds were used to pay off porn stars? To the best of my knowledge there 2 issues with various payoffs that have come to light and none of them involve misuse of campaign funds.

      The first is that Trump used his own money to payoff a porn star to stay quite during a campaign (Stormy). This is not illegal and has already been tossed out in similar cases (Edwards for one). The mere fact that the payoff may have benefitted his campaign is not enough to make it a campaign expense which needs to be reported. Even if it was the normal course of action when not reporting the use of your own funds during a campaign for campaign related activities is usually just to update the financial reports.

      The second, and more gray area, is the Enquirer paying off porn stars for exclusive rights to their stories and then burying them (McDougall). This can be considered an in kind contribution which should be reported and may exceed limits but once again like the Edwards case, can also be considered a known friend using their business to help a friend avoid embarrassing their family.

      Both are hard to prove but neither actually involves using campaign funds.

    4. Re:Twitter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ORANGE MAN GOOD

  2. Re: GNAA GNAA FELCH PATROL GNAA GNAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    need more that 140 characters for that

  3. But how will people track ratios? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems like it will take a lot of the (remaining) fun from Twitter, not being able to see the ratio of likes to comments...

    I can't see a good case to hide either. Seeing how much something is liked can be really inspiring for some meaningful or heartwarming tweet (yes there are such things).

    Similarly, seeing reply count is kind of nice as a metric of, should I even bother to reply, or read responses?

    Seems like all changes are made to fight content Twitter dislikes. But all it ever does is make things worse for good content, and for Twitter usability...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:But how will people track ratios? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron.

    2. Re: But how will people track ratios? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be intentional: SJWs have taken to using bots to artificially "ratio" prominent conservatives. (Because it "shows how dumb they are" or something.)

      Twitter is probably sick of the spam and considers hiding it a small price to pay if it will convince SJWs to stop spamming.

    3. Re:But how will people track ratios? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe there is a case to show how many of your friends liked something. But knowing how many random bots liked it is a disservice.

  4. A Twitter network outage would be great by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

    As a follow up to no Facebook, Twitter being down would be great also.

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    1. Re:A Twitter network outage would be great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can go down on a cock anytime you like, traitor. Putin will see you now.

  5. Alternate Headline: Twitter Steps Up MiniTrue by Elias+Israel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With this change, Twitter is doubling down on removing content they don't agree with and making it harder to see when dumb comments from their anointed "blue checks" are being ratio'd into oblivion. "Conform or be cast out."

    1. Re:Alternate Headline: Twitter Steps Up MiniTrue by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yup!

    2. Re:Alternate Headline: Twitter Steps Up MiniTrue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Push whatever content they like and call it "Popular"

    3. Re:Alternate Headline: Twitter Steps Up MiniTrue by segwonk · · Score: 1

      "are being ratio'd into oblivion."

      Honest question, can you explain what getting ratio'd means? I've looked this up on Urban Dictionary, but I'm still not clear. Are we talking about retweet to like ratio? Or are we talking about followed to following ratio? How are trolls and/or bots being used to change either of these ratios, and why would an average user care about those ratios anyway?

      I'm not trolling, I'm really trying to understand. Thanks.

      --
      - ------ Go 'til ya know.
    4. Re:Alternate Headline: Twitter Steps Up MiniTrue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Ratio'd" indicates a post with substantially more comments than likes. Considering the relative effort that goes into a comment versus a like, a comment with more response comments than likes is taken as a bad comment. Despite the grognards' whining, there's no reason this should be taken as an SJW thing-the mechanism should be consistent throughout twitter across ideologies. It should be noted that unlike slashdot, "into oblivion" is hyperbole-unless the user is embarrased enough to delete the tweet under their own power.

    5. Re:Alternate Headline: Twitter Steps Up MiniTrue by Elias+Israel · · Score: 1

      The "ratio" is a measure of what people think about a particular tweet and refers to the ratio of retweets vs responses. In general, it is thought that if a tweet receives far more responses than retweets, it's because most people think the idea expressed was not a very good one and are pushing back against it.

      Since this pattern was first noticed, users on Twitter have reinforced it, often by piling on with short replies on tweets (or personalities) they find risible, in an attempt to drive home the point.

  6. Back in the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    we used to have open protocols and you could make your client just so you liked it. And usually there were multiple clients to choose from, with all sorts of configurable options.

    These days it's world news when a stupid company with a stupidly dumb "product" adds a few teeny basic features "in biggest set of changes since it launched". Makes one wonder what they've been up to in the meantime.

    This you call progress.

    But all it does is make me feel old and yearn for the days when USENET (and FidoNet, and so on) were full of people who cared about what they wrote. There was less to read, but more to enjoy.

    1. Re:Back in the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truthfully the comments are why I still come to Slashdot. They tend to be better and far less memey than other new aggregate sites.

    2. Re:Back in the day by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Whenever I install mIRC, I still go to the about dialog and type "arnie".

    3. Re:Back in the day by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      IRC servers with quality tech channels are still around

    4. Re:Back in the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truly, September never ends.

  7. Hide more! by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about hiding tweets, and adverts too?

    How glorious would it be if Twitter was just a blank page?

    1. Re:Hide more! by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      They could take a page of out Facebook's AI and just self-censor itself in its entirety ;) https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

  8. And yet... by TopShelf · · Score: 2

    ...still no Edit button. *sigh*

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:And yet... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I know, right? I think "color coding" of responses would have been waaayyyy down on my personal list of desired changes.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Finally! A platform not afraid to highlight wrongthink so I know to immediately disregard their information without further consideration. Thanks big daddy, Twitter.

  10. Just die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do whatever you like, I don't use that garbage anyway. If Twitter went away tomorrow the Internet could only improve.

  11. 4/1? by jrq · · Score: 1

    It's not even 2 weeks until April First, for this kind of shit.

    --
    My UID is prime!
  12. This Information Is Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The information posted here is incorrect. Like and retweet totals are just not as emphasized when you tap into a reply. https://twitter.com/karissabe/status/1105895429361688576

    1. Re:This Information Is Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dataraping company with useless "product" changes font size... film at 11.

  13. That's nice by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I'm color blind, thx.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: That's nice by kiki60 · · Score: 1

      liked can be really inspiring for some meaningful or heartwarming tweet (yes there are such things). Similarly, seeing reply count is kind of nice as a metric of, should I even bother to reply, or read responses? https://audacity.onl/ https://findmyiphone.onl/ https://origin.onl/

  14. "My SJW fetish continues" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "SJW's are literally all I can think about now. They dominate my mind with their SJW-ness. Seriously, SJW was my favorite 3-letter word grouping, I used to be SJW myself until the hippies beat me up and stole it. Stupid SJW's! So mean."

    (sobbing sounds)

    1. Re:"My SJW fetish continues" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here comes the anonymous SJW to prove his point. Look at how triggered you are. Get help.

  15. Re:Kendall is the world's most desperate loser. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google's new toxicity filter would make short work of your stalker posting, and that's a good thing.

  16. velocity-vortex tuna melt by epine · · Score: 1

    I reengaged with Twitter for about a month not long ago, a decade after emitting my first tentative Tweet, and for a few days I didn't entirely hate the experience.

    At first I started small, but then I threw caution to the wind, and began following people from both the technological and the political side of the spectrum. Within two days of having technology and politics randomly jumbled into my feed, I had mothballed my Twitter account for another decade.

    I can be highly asynchronous in my mental appetites, but that brief fly-by of the ultimate conflation nearly killed me. I guess Twitter doesn't want to let me sort or partition my feed, because then some portion of it wouldn't be urgently fresh, and a week later—on a designated day of the week, perhaps—I might rudely bump some stale political threads that are hours cold.

    There is no solution that I can foresee to social media's inherent velocity problem.

    What fires together, wires together.

    Unless you want to turn your brain into a transporter-accident molten howl, the velocity-vortex tuna melt is best avoided.

    [*] Apparently there are some on again, off again add-ons to accomplish this in various browser environments, but I simply can't summon up the curatorial mojo to engage with this hapless cause.

    [**] GenX really should be called the Now generation. Like Woodstockers later in life, with the wisdom of years they'll recall their chosen mind-altering drug with hazy recollections of glam happening nostalgia and visceral shudders of inward disgust.

  17. Re:Kendall is the world's most desperate loser. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doubtful. The weird stalker culture here is kind of fascinating though, and one of the only reasons I read the comments. I haven't observed anything quite so targeted anywhere else. Against just a small handful of users, and regardless of what they say. I would never even consider making an account.

  18. Tweet this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Twitter is for twits.

  19. It is what you want it to be. by sheramil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "In order to build a perfect society, you need perfect citizens." - Shirow Masamune, "Appleseed"

    Twitter is a mirror. When a monkey looks in, no philosopher looks out.

  20. makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    twitter is just dumb enough to do this. will surely hurt their platform.

  21. Don't think, just consume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seeing the likes and retweets is useful to gauge how much support a thought expressed in a tweet actually has. You can easily identify marginal opinions and storms in a teacup. Hiding those will make it possible to promote tweets that the company likes, even if they are utterly unpopular.