Slashdot Mirror


Bacteria Discovered In Irish Soil Kills Four Drug-Resistant Superbugs (msn.com)

NBC News reports on how microbiologist Gerry Quinn "followed up on some folklore his family had passed on to him." Old timers insisted that the dirt in the vicinity of a nearly 1,500-year-old church in County Fermanagh in Northern Ireland, an area once occupied by the Druids, had almost miraculous curative powers.... "Here in the western fringes of Ireland there is still a tradition of having this folk cure," Quinn told NBC News. "We can look at it and see maybe it's just superstition -- or we can actually investigate and ask, 'is there anything in the soil that produces antibiotics...?'"

Once Quinn and his team decided to focus on the Irish soil, they narrowed their search to a specific type of bacteria, called Streptomyces, because other strains of this bacteria have led to the development of 75 percent of existing antibiotics, Quinn said. The bacteria was discovered by a team based at Swansea University Medical School, made up of researchers from Wales, Brazil, Iraq and Northern Ireland. The researchers first tried the newly discovered strain of Streptomyces on some garden variety bacteria. In their petri dish experiment, "it knocked them out," Quinn said. "Then we thought we'd take it one step further and find some multi-resistant organisms."

The bacteria in the experiment killed four out of the top six organisms that are resistant to antibiotics, including MRSA. "It's quite surprising," said Quinn... "The lesson is, some of the cures are right underneath your feet."

Vaughn Cooper, an evolutionary geneticist/microbiologist at the University of Pittsburgh's School of Medicine, tells NBC that more research is needed before this yields a super-antibiotic -- but "it's a cool discovery."

The World Health Organization has named antibiotic resistance as one of 2019's ten top public health threats.

88 comments

  1. It was alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Drunken Irish bacteria are good fighters

    1. Re: It was alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read it and weep! Yay!

    2. Re:It was alcohol by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      a nearly 1,500-year-old church in County Fermanagh in Northern Ireland, an area once occupied by the Druids

      And now the Christians and Druids will have a war in Northern Ireland over whose bacteria it is.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re: It was alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I met a pharm strudent in savannah a couple hours aog and joked about this and actually got llaid. don't doubt it till ya tried ittttt

    4. Re:It was alcohol by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      More like one set of Christians, another set of Christians, and the Druids.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:It was alcohol by jcr · · Score: 2

      The druids have been gone for over a millennium. Hippies LARPing as druids aren't druids.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:It was alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came for this very comment; was not disappointed.

    7. Re:It was alcohol by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Obligatory XKCD.
      https://xkcd.com/1217/

    8. Re:It was alcohol by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They're still vastly preferable to Asatru-tards.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Happy St Patties Day by wolfheart111 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A gift from the Irish. WE need all the good news we can get today... CC

    --
    [($)]
    1. Re:Happy St Patties Day by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2
      There's also this other headline, which for some reason has had less coverage:

      Material Discovered In Chernobyl Soil Kills Four Drug-Resistant Superbugs

      Can't imagine why this is less newsworthy...

    2. Re:Happy St Patties Day by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What's bothering you, Brexit or the Rugby?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Happy St Patties Day by DethLok · · Score: 1

      Is it... radioactive material?

      So it kills 4 drug-resistant superbugs. And pretty much every other cellular life too.

      This is not great news...

      Now I'll go and read the article... oooh, there is no linked article! Why is that, I wonder?...

      Searching for "Material Discovered In Chernobyl Soil Kills Four Drug-Resistant Superbugs" finds... with Google, just this article.

      Hmmm.

    4. Re:Happy St Patties Day by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Nah it's probably some kind of toxin.

    5. Re: Happy St Patties Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It'd be the rugby. It's the English who voted for the collapse of the Good Friday Accords when they voted for Brexit.

    6. Re:Happy St Patties Day by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Don't trip over your cape, Captain Obvious!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re: Happy St Patties Day by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Well .... they actually voted for Vera Lynn doing a spit roast with Richard Todd & John Mills on the white cliffs of Dover plus 20 squagillion in tax cuts for Rees-Mogg & his chums. I mean for the NHS. Oh, and to be allowed to keep the Queen on stamps.

      The GFA was just collateral damage.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. correlation & causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    again: not the same thing

    I'll avoid being kiled by incompitent "scientists" and stick to the best method to preserve helth and happyness. reading my bible and praying

    1. Re: correlation & causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some film noir to cleanse the palate

    2. Re:correlation & causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump 4ever!

    3. Re: correlation & causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll avoid being killkilled by incompetent "scientists" and stick to the best method to preserve health and happiness; reading my bible and praying.

      *incompetence averted*

  4. Here we go by AlanObject · · Score: 1

    I can see where this is going.

    The profit-driven pharmaceutical industry is going to capture this bacteria, culture it, and formulate some new medication that will "save thousands of lives."

    Everyone happy, right?

    Maybe. That's not the end. Right now that magical cure is "right underneath your feet" (TFA). What they will ignore are those bacteria are part of a complex ecosystem where the parts are interconnected and dependent on each other. But they can't package and make a profit on an ecosystem just some molecule or gene sequence that they can isolate and mass produce to have some immediate effect.

    Then they will proceed to hype the threat, scaring hundreds of millions into thinking they must have their product or die a horrible death.

    Result: it will be way over-prescribed and recklessly used (because hey, insurance covers it, right?) so that the harmful pathogens circulating will evolve into something resistant to it. Any side effects of the new wonder drug will be downplayed and anyone pointing any of this out will be ridiculed as anti-science.

    You read it here first, folks.

    1. Re:Here we go by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You read it here first, folks.

      What you said was so generic, I doubt even a single person read it here first.

      You didn't name the name of the thing, so it doesn't even have that much difference compared to the standard rant.

    2. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Most of the drug resistant bacteria arise in third world countries with lax regulation and enforcement of pharmaceutical laws. This is augmented by the low-IQ of the mud people who get pills from their pharmacist, a turd worlder with hardly more than a junior high school education. The lack of control on distribution of antibiotics allow the low IQ indigenous people eat antibiotics like candy for aches, pains, or any other inappropriate use. This gives rise to antibiotic resistant pathogens, all of which have their origin in third world mud holes.

    3. Re: Here we go by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Was he trolling? It's hard to tell. Pretty weak either way.

    4. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As rants go, it was pretty much a 4 anyway. Now we just need to spread this dirt on Kendall and see what happens. Fucking coprophages need to die.

    5. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^ Fun at Parties! ^^^

    6. Re: Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost as weak as your "the 737 c8 is totally safe and should continue flying without skipping a beat" idiot's superfail, right? Moron. You and Kendall are probably the same incel.

    7. Re: Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep, you describe the mudhole that is the U.S. very well.

      They should be burned to the ground, really.

    8. Re: Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still smarter than anything you've ever said in all of your sad, pathetic and worthless life.

    9. Re: Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to buy a vowel, Alex. Are there any left (A, E, I, O, U and sometimes ... Hmmm what letter was sometimes a vowel)?

    10. Re:Here we go by Required+Snark · · Score: 2
      Completely accurate. Want an example: anti-bacterial hand soap/dish soap. Advertising is awash (pun intended) with "Kills 99.99% of Germs!". Meanwhile current bacteria populations are becoming immune to the agents used in these products. It's called evolutionary adaptation and it works no matter what anyone thinks about evolution or god.

      Meanwhile, if someone can make money on new antibiotics now the future can just go fuck itself. Use it up and breed (pun intended) future trouble because PROFIT!

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    11. Re: Here we go by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Now you know why Irish Spring soap is so strong! Never leave home without it! Eat two bars before entering a hospital just to be safe! Always wash your hands with hand sanitizer.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of bacteria resistance is due to antibiotics use raising animals for slaughter in industrialized western "agriculture". They feed the animals antibiotics so they can raise them in very close quarters and low hygiene (cheaply) and because those animals do not develop an immune system and thus grow bigger.

      So you see it's not the low-IQ people, it's the "high IQ" devils; you racist idiot!

    13. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Completely accurate. Slashdot even had a story about it: Third World Superbug Resistant to 26 antibiotics

      Years ago I knew a girl who was a fellow student in high school. She took a trip to India and came in contact with some awful pathogen which proceeded to destroy multiple organs and resulted in her death, despite the best available medical care in the US.

      India is still a filthy third world country, with raw sewage flowing in the streams and rivers.

      Given how many good, interesting, and quite safe places there are to travel in the world, you'd have to wonder why people want to go to a shithole like India.

    14. Re: Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some idiots will take offense at that statement, but nobody cares what Democrats think. Import the third world and you are the third world. Unfortunate that these fools believe in magic dirt - and I don't mean the Leprechaun manure kind from tfa

    15. Re:Here we go by DethLok · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah...

      Just like bacteria that were found to be penicillin resistant decades BEFORE we started using penicillin...

      like this article says:

      https://www.theatlantic.com/sc...

      Penicillin is use by bacteria to defend themselves. Of course there are other bacteria that are resistant to it! That's how bactiera A can eat bactiera B! Bacteria A are resistant to the effects of bacteria B's defenses, penicillin.

      We "discovered" it thousands of years after bacteria had. So obviously there are many bacteria out there in the world who know how to defend against penicillin, it's not a cure-all, it's a defense.

      Though I think I'm missing an article that I read a few days ago and... can't be found. Pffft.

      I should mention that the discoverer did say that we shouldn't over-prescribe penicillin due to the likelyhood of transferred immunity, but... seems that a number of greedy nations paid no attention that, and went for the money instead of life.

    16. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that the countries where this is a problem aren't those where medical care is lacking or non-existing.
      African doctors in places that don't even have clean water are typically trained by western doctors and knows about this problem.
      You find the highest concentration in countries with high corruption.
      India, Russia and China creates a lot of superbugs partly because of hubris and partly because of not giving a fuck about anyone else.

    17. Re: Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half of US is third world. The half that is afraid of teh Indians.

    18. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good points. China, Russia, and India are rife with corruption. The company I work for pulled out of China because the CEO got tired of paying bribes and ad hoc "export taxes". And now our political overlords are trying to introduce Chinese processed food into our food supply. Yuck. No thanks. I'd rather eat boiled acorns.

    19. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory link.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dotori-muk

    20. Re:Here we go by jbengt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Penicillin is use by bacteria to defend themselves. Of course there are other bacteria that are resistant to it! That's how bactiera A can eat bactiera B! Bacteria A are resistant to the effects of bacteria B's defenses, penicillin.

      Your main point might be correct, but this is not. Penicillin was derived from mold, not from bacteria. RTFA that you linked.

    21. Re:Here we go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its name is Streptomyces sp.myrophorea. It is wintergreen smelly.

      They are working on purification. Such bacteria can also case potato scab, so dont go spreading it around Idaho accidentally.

      Now I have just spoiled the patent for combining wintergreen like oils with antibiotics taken at the same time. It is possible that resistant receptors are fooled to lock on to some chain to assist starch breakdown.

      Screw medicine - this sounds like useful for potato vodka mash.

    22. Re: Here we go by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      Now you know why Irish Spring soap is so strong! Never leave home without it! Eat two bars before entering a hospital just to be safe! Always wash your hands with hand sanitizer.

      I get my bacteria resistance by eating Lucky Charms cereal. That crap tastes like medicine anyhow.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    23. Re:Here we go by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Completely accurate. Want an example: anti-bacterial hand soap/dish soap. Advertising is awash (pun intended) with "Kills 99.99% of Germs!". Meanwhile current bacteria populations are becoming immune to the agents used in these products. It's called evolutionary adaptation and it works no matter what anyone thinks about evolution or god.

      Meanwhile, if someone can make money on new antibiotics now the future can just go fuck itself. Use it up and breed (pun intended) future trouble because PROFIT!

      You know, I've been hearing about the resistant-microbe-pocolypse on /. for what, 20 years now?

      Nobody doubts the existence of resistance, but the apocalypse part is taking a little longer than anticipated.

    24. Re:Here we go by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      1. Go to a hospital (not that I'm wishing you ill health, this is just an example).

      2. Stay long enough to learn the names of about ten nurses and janitors in addition to several doctors.

      3. Develop an antibiotic resistant infection.

      Voila! The apocalypse has arrived for you. Get well soon.

    25. Re: Here we go by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No, see, when you don't have information yet, but you're making conclusions, you're already wrong.

      If the event ends up happening the way you guessed, you were still wrong when you made the conclusion without evidence.

      I stand by everything I said; there was not yet enough information to judge. The only public information was eyewitness accounts. If you don't believe the eyewitness accounts, it is still true at that stage that they are the only information you have. So the realistic, rational choices about what to believe happened are:
      1) I don't know
      2) I don't know
      or 3) I don't know

      Guessing is claiming you know, when you don't. You do that because you're an idiot. You even suspect it is true, which is why you hate anonymously. Come on, big boy, trim that neckbeard, make yourself presentable, and put your pseudonym next to your hate

  5. How did it kill them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By killing the host organism.

  6. better start rebuilding the soil then... by js290 · · Score: 1

    "The use of cattle and cover crops in agriculture operations provide the link to completing the nutrient cycle in the soil."https://t.co/8XwmQjt0c9

    — Savory Institute (@SavoryInstitute) February 21, 2019

    --
    "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
  7. Old Wives Tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    'But do not despise the lore that has come down from distant years; for oft it may chance that old wives keep in memory word of things that once were needful for the wise to know.'
    -- Lord of the Rings

  8. Bioprospecting, aka: nothing's new under the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news aspirin was extracted from willow bark. Most medications up to the end of the 20th century were derived or extracted from natural sources known about for hundreds (or even thousands) of years.

  9. So don't over use it by NerdENerd · · Score: 1

    How long until there is resistant to the new super antibiotic?

    1. Re:So don't over use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't over use it" is advice that I've determined, is impossible to follow. Hear me out.

      Yeah, OK, in some perfect world it might be possible to use antibiotics with discipline. That world isn't this world though.

      If you have a loved one with some mysterious ailment and it might be bacterial in nature, you push for treatment with antibiotics. Similarly, doctors often want to take the safe road and issue antibiotics prophylactically. Livestock owners look at the cost of losing an animal and it's large next to the cost of an antibiotic shot. Even putting antibiotics in feed, it's a terrible practice from the perspective of resistance, but it's cost-effective economically or else they wouldn't do it.

      But suppose we really cracked down. No trivial use of antibiotics! And somehow it works, the rules are obeyed. Antibiotic resistance will still evolve, it will just take longer. The fundamental problem remains. We'd better face up to that.

      Bacteria are powerfully adapted to survive. They breed rapidly and prolifically. Antibiotic resistance is just the latest challenge for them in a billion+ year struggle for survival. You know who or what bacteria's greatest enemy is? Viruses. Mankind is small potatoes compared to that.

    2. Re:So don't over use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such antibiotics use is banned in sweden and it works fine.

      The use of antibiotics is in part to prevent piglets from dieing from diarrea, but that problem is solved by giving the pigs different food.

    3. Re:So don't over use it by fafalone · · Score: 1

      But I have a runny nose and need a prescription for the strongest antibiotic there is, NOW!

    4. Re:So don't over use it by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      Sure but other bacteria/fungus/mold will evolve ways to beat those bacteria. Most of this resistance probably doesn't come from us using the antibiotics at all but rather from the bacteria competing with each other. Which is how they evolve their offensive (antibiotic) capabilities in the first place.

      I think the overuse concern is overblown in any case. The issue isn't the drugs being overused, the issue is the drugs not being used completely. If you take the full course and you completely wipe out the infection then there is nothing remaining to evolve. It's when you mostly kill the infection but there are stragglers in the low level antibiotic environment that there is a chance to breed resistant bacteria.

    5. Re:So don't over use it by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Except that the whole time you're peeing that antibiotic into your nearest convenient body of moving water.

      Not finishing a full course of antibiotics is definitely bad, it turns your body into an experiment in directed evolution. Overuse (not just in humans) of antibiotics is also bad because it turns your local waterways into similar experiments.

  10. How long until by Shazatoga · · Score: 1

    this is over used and MRSA et al become resistant to it?

    1. Re:How long until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does it matter. If you don'y use it, you still have MRSA, don't you?

    2. Re:How long until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is over used and MRSA et al become resistant to it?

      Do us a favor and don't use it when you get MRSA.

  11. Cure for the common cold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I can beg my doctor to prescribe it for a viral infection I've got? That would work, right?

  12. Rub some dirt on it! by cdsparrow · · Score: 2

    So, the macho 'rub some dirt on it' thing actually works if you have special dirt... #themoreyouknow

    1. Re:Rub some dirt on it! by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      Rather than turning this into a drug they should stick with this method of application. That will curb usage a bit.

  13. But did you know St. Patrick was a paedo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm? He was. By definition.

  14. One bit of woo is true by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    If one bit of woo is true, then two bits of woo are true. If two bits of woo are true, all woo is true.

    You can bet pounds to pigshit that some people are going to interpret this as proof that crystals, homeopathy and pyramids work.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:One bit of woo is true by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      Nonesense. This is nothing but evidence that the druids worked with aliens who engineered this bacteria for them.

    2. Re:One bit of woo is true by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. But I'm willing to concede that there's precious little evidence to the contrary.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. A proper trial, then another one by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    They need to run a proper trial, and then another one.

    Why? To be sure, to be sure!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. Old Wives' Tale by Whibla · · Score: 1

    I can't remember where or when I first heard this - it was a long time ago - but it's a toss up between congenital laziness and 'belief' in the 'wisdom of wives' that accounts for my casual attitude towards cleaning / a little bit of dirt.

    "A child that hasn't eaten their weight in dirt by the time they're two won't make it past five"

    1. Re:Old Wives' Tale by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      It is pretty far fetched to assume that playing in the dirt is beneficial because of its anti-bacterial properties. For each bacterium that the dirt kills, it brings hundreds of other ones.

    2. Re:Old Wives' Tale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > For each bacterium that the dirt kills, it brings hundreds of other ones.
      Yep. And the vast majority of them are harmless. This gives your immune system a whole bunch of moving, but relatively unarmed targets to practice on. Because of this, it'll be in much better shape to defend you by the time something actually dangerous appears.

      A bit like vaccination really, but instead of (something like) a 10,000x boost against one specific invader, it's a 10x boost against every invader.

    3. Re:Old Wives' Tale by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      "It is pretty far fetched to assume that playing in the dirt is beneficial because of its anti-bacterial properties."

      And yet this site would have never been discovered if playing in dirt didn't turn out to be beneficial for the locals who were aware of it over the course of thousands of years. Or are you suggesting playing in the dirt was not beneficial and this superbug killer bacteria that was found when looking for the explanation of the benefit is just a coincidence?

    4. Re:Old Wives' Tale by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Or are you suggesting playing in the dirt was not beneficial and this superbug killer bacteria that was found when looking for the explanation of the benefit is just a coincidence?

      It would only be a coincidence if the dirt from the next town did not have similar properties. However, it is quite common for soil bacteria to make anti bacterial toxins. Most of our antibiotics are based on them. The problem is not so much finding them, but rather finding the ones that we can safely ingest or apply to open wounds, while still maintaining their effectiveness.

      According to folk tradition, people would not "play in the dirt", rather they would wrap it in cloth, and place it under their pillow:
      https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-no...

      I struggle to imagine how the anti bacterial properties would work in that case.

      Playing in the dirt is probably effective to train our immune system, not as a way to ingest anti-bacterial chemicals (which would only be effective if you were actually infected, making it less likely that you would actually go outside to play in the dirt)

    5. Re:Old Wives' Tale by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's not due to the antimicrobial properties of dirt. It's due to the microbes in the dirt. Many studies, some very large, have shown that exposure to a greater variety of microbes as a child is associated with a better immune system: both better at fighting infection and less likely to engage in autoimmune reactions.

      The trick is to get that exposure without catching something that will actually kill you. Dirt is pretty decent for that.

    6. Re:Old Wives' Tale by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The trick is to get that exposure without catching something that will actually kill you. Dirt is pretty decent for that.

      As long as you don't get soil-borne anthrax.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Old Wives' Tale by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      "It would only be a coincidence if the dirt from the next town did not have similar properties."

      I'd contend it would still be a coincidence even if the bacteria exists throughout a fair bit of the region. There are no passed down tales of healing with the dirt where I live and I'd venture this particular variety of highly effective bacteria isn't here either.

      "However, it is quite common for soil bacteria to make anti bacterial toxins." It is not however common for those toxins to more effective than known antibiotics for killing superbugs. The bacteria in this soil do.

      "According to folk tradition, people would not "play in the dirt", rather they would wrap it in cloth, and place it under their pillow:"

      I've heard of druidic traditions of using mud packs and burying in dirt/mud the current traditions may well stem from them. However, given the amount of skin and oil and outright filth in bedding, especially bedding since druidic times tossing it under the pillow could serve to inoculate the bedding.

      You might contend I could play the "what if" game forever. Changing the parameters forever. Normally you'd be right. But there is a very simple logical flaw in your reasoning vs mine and these researchers. We've started with the observation of the results and are forming hypothesis, and they have tested theirs successfully while I'm piggy backing on their results, you've started from a conclusion that isn't based on evidence or observation and seek to justify it.

  17. this is not yahoo news Gehy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wtf? why is this on /. ??
    gehy

  18. Like a Chuch Yard Shadow, Creeping Up On Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh... Land near a christian church invariably means a graveyard.

  19. "the lastnature, nature" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is good news!
    a new place we can dump chemical toxins and radioactive waste to let nature solve the problem!
    the other places are busy already.

  20. Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are enough promising discoveries like this to produce somewhere between 4 and 6 new families of antibiotics. The basic research on several of these candidates was done years ago. All that needs to be done is for a drug company to refine the research and complete the testing process.

    The problem is, there is not a lot of money in antibiotics. They tend to make people better after just a few doses. So the drug companies aren't interested.

    The next generation is going to have it rough because of the pure greed of this generation. I guess it sucks to be them.

  21. Indian have such beliefs too by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    One of the common practice in Hinduism is the thirtha yatra[*] , meaning (thirth = water, yatra = journey sanskrit) water pilgrimage. Visit so many holy temples and take a ceremonial drink of a few drops from that temple pond.

    Thinking about it, this would be like deliberately exposing oneself to various pathogens, fungi, bacteria, virii that are endemic to different parts of the country. And this is a sort of primitive immunization protocol, isn't it. If it so happens some temple pond is always infested with cow-pox virus, these pilgrims will get immunity from small pox. Edward Jenner's casual observation "milkmaids who get cow-pox never get small pox" was how the entire vaccination (vacca = cow in Latin) science started.

    Looks like they stumbled on to an useful practice by trial and error.

    [*] Many variations and pronounciations in various Indian languages.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  22. cough cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bullshit.

  23. People are dying; distribute the new drug NOW!! by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Seriously, though--good on the researchers if they've found yet another antibiotic, but...
    Everyone here knows this just buys us a (little) time and doesn't address the fundamental issue, right?

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    1. Re:People are dying; distribute the new drug NOW!! by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Everyone here knows this just buys us a (little) time and doesn't address the fundamental issue, right

      There is no fundamental issue to be solved, there is only buying more time.

  24. "Super" antibiotic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate that type of sensationalism. It's a new strain of antibiotic that hasn't been mass produced so bacteria haven't evolved a resistance to it yet.

  25. Kills more than that by neuro88 · · Score: 1

    Bacteria Discovered In Irish Soil Kills Four Drug-Resistant Superbugs

    Although missing from the summary, it also kills potatoes.

  26. Re:Christchurch by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    You watch the video? dont...

    --
    [($)]