Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Sues Former Employees For Allegedly Stealing Data, Autopilot Source Code (reuters.com)

Tesla is suing a former engineer at the company, claiming he copied the source code for its Autopilot technology before joining a Chinese self-driving car startup in January. Reuters reports: The engineer, Guangzhi Cao, copied more than 300,000 files related to Autopilot source code as he prepared to join China's Xiaopeng Motors Technology Company Ltd, the Silicon Valley carmaker said in the lawsuit filed in a California court. Separately, Tesla lawyers on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against four former employees and U.S. self-driving car startup Zoox Inc, alleging the employees stole proprietary information and trade secrets for developing warehousing, logistics and inventory control operations. The Verge reported on the lawsuit filed against Cao: Tesla says that last year, Cao started uploading "complete copies of Tesla's Autopilot-related source code" to his iCloud account. The company claims he ultimately moved more than 300,000 files and directories related to Autopilot. After accepting a job with XPeng at the end of last year, Tesla says Cao deleted 120,000 files off his work computer and disconnected his personal iCloud account, and then "repeatedly logged into Tesla's secure networks" to clear his browser history before his last day with the company. Tesla also claims Cao recruited another Autopilot employee to XPeng in February. Tesla claims that it gives XPeng "unfettered access" to Autopilot: "Absent immediate relief, Tesla believes Cao and his new employer, [XPeng], will continue to have unfettered access to Tesla's marquee technology, the product of more than five years' work and over hundreds of millions of dollars of investment, which they have no legal right to possess," the company's lawyers write.

87 comments

  1. Fishy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wiping your browser history and personal stuff is pretty standard before leaving a company, hardly suspicious.

    If he did steal their tech then you have to wonder if it's worth it. They are years behind in this area, rolling back their promises and no longer talking about a timeline for it.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla isn't afraid of competition. They are afraid of any one analyzing the source code and seeing the "autopilot" is held together by duct-tape and a random generator. Teals is afraid of any regulator looking into it and getting it banned.

    2. Re:Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you think that Tesla is behind, then you obviously are not paying attention.

        About the only one close, if not beating them, might be Google. But the rest are way behind.

    3. Re:Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I'm more wondering about some of the claims made here. 300,000 files? Let me guess, he ran "git clone https://path/to/git/server/autopilot.git" ?

      And he uploaded them to iCloud... because of a new version of MacOS shoved down their throat by Apple that automatically syncs your documents folder to iCloud?

      Sounds like two independent things conspiring together without the developer's knowledge to me.

    4. Re: Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This exactly

    5. Re:Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No thanks for the spam link Merlin. "Do Achievements. Get Paid." Yeah, right.

    6. Re: Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely, but that doesn't get headlines and fuel a persecution myth to encourage the fanbois to keep the faith.

    7. Re: Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lol that is literally all code running everything.

    8. Re:Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think Tesla has any self driving technology, then you’re a massive retard.

    9. Re: Fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially Google, methinks.

    10. Re:Fishy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Tesla has some level 2 driver assistance tech. Audi has level 3 but can't seem to get it approved for release, GM and Waymo/Google have full level 4 self driving.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Fishy by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Just flag as spam.

  2. Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked. SHOCKED! Well, not that shocked.

    1. Re:Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'd be more shocked if the Chinese could come up with something original. Chinese and Indians they're the same. They cheat, they steal and copy from US firms. And the fucking damning part is that the West is complicit in this by allowing these eastern fucktards to copy all the innovations. Congress is guilty because they have allowed US firms to offshore to China knowing full well the Chinese require those foreign firms to enter into partnerships with local companies (At least the Chinks are not utter idiots but we in the West are). Any idiot could have guessed what would happen and as the saying goes the rest is history.

    2. Re: Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stole gunpowder and countless other technologies from the east. Without which you would not have colonized and industrialized.

    3. Re: Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my fucking god, get over the faux crimes of a thousand years ago. Do you want reparations or something?

      Please join us in this millennia.

      No one gives a fuck what happened hundreds or thousands of years ago.

    4. Re: Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And furthermore, if the so-called east had all this tech]how come they didnt use it to industrialize? Maybe because something else was needed?

      Like, oh, say, an innovative culture that valued a broad based middle class and education for more than just the more elite of society?

      Fucking whiners.

    5. Re:Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL. Repeat after me: No NASA without Dr. Merkwürdigliebe.

    6. Re: Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stole gunpowder and countless other technologies from the east. Without which you would not have colonized and industrialized.

      So go steal from the arabs then since it was most likely them that brought the knowledge to the west.

      Do you have proof that theft was involved and not simply information sharing?

    7. Re:Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by junglee_iitk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man H1B really messed up the "intellect". Indians steal code from The West?

      Don't know if you lost a job to an Indian, but you are exactly the type of person who should.

    8. Re:Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used to say the same thing about Japan and Korea after WW2.

      It is a common trajectory that developing countries seem to go through:

      Manufacture for others --> Steal technology --> Bootstrap into creating things of your own

      Time will tell if China and India follow the pattern. Assuming they do, more manufacturing will probably move to Africa/South America (impacting the existing natural resources there at the same time). I'm 90% sure that China is already thinking about this, which explains a large part of their Roads and Bridges plan in Africa. It sets the stage for more close ties as China modernizes.

    9. Re: Chinese engineers stealing trade secrets??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... When you steal, you call those who were stolen from to STFU because they are whiners. But when you are stolen from, you call them thieves? Interesting...

  3. CaffeinatedBacon/Crimson Tsunami, was that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this you or just a friend of yours? I would guess so.

    Just like you to either troll, lie, cheat, or steal.

  4. Political Correctness at play again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did Tesla expect would happen ?
    They hired a Chinese man, and the guy acted like all Chinese do. They steal and copy from US firms with no qualms whatsoever.

    1. Re:Political Correctness at play again.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but USA is making it easy. It is their own fucking fault. At least in most of the west, we do not worry about not hiring somebody due to this issue. We worry more about the theft and simply do not hire possible, let alone probable, thieves.

  5. Don't hire Chinese employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are theives.

    1. Re:Don't hire Chinese employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't hire Chinese employees

      But but but that would be racist. We need to fill quotas dude. We need women (even if they're incompetent), we need latinos, latinas, lgbt, chinese, indians, cockroaches etc... Otherwise we're racists.

    2. Re:Don't hire Chinese employees by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Not hiring women is being racist? Since when?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:Don't hire Chinese employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but even they know how to spell thieves

    4. Re:Don't hire Chinese employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thursday March 21, 2019 @07:12PM

  6. Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by BlueCoder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He could have simply been taking his work home with him... could have. That he could do such a thing shows their poor security and ability to protect their own supposed trade secrets. He did it for over a year and not just before he left the company. He could have understood it was "officially" forbidden but in practice it was not enforced which is proven by how he did it for over a year before he left the company. Theoretically he could have simply been covering up frowned upon ways he cut corners that he used in order to perform in his job better. Not sure I believe it but it is easily plausible. Based on this he shouldn't be sued now.

    As far as the company that hired him... I wouldn't want to touch him if I intended to ever sell my cars in the western society; since it should be trivial to compel the company into an independent code review. Either for direct copyright infringement or code or against patents.

    P.S. On a tangent... I think all software sold in all markets for all commercial products should have it's source code be forced to be confidentially registered. Makes it easier to catch cheaters. So companies can't go out of business or claim a fire ate their homework. Would also make it easier to do automated code comparisons.

    1. Re:Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by quenda · · Score: 1, Informative

      The company could still learn a huge amount without actually directly using the source code.

      Why on earth would Tesla have ever allowed a Chinese national near their trade secrets?
      I hope the US military is not so careless.

    2. Re: Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I don't know. Chinese people, assuming he was Chinese, are very polite and usually ask permission to take things home or use their own equipment or whatever. I suspect any American who worked in China would carry some know how away with them when they left. Or are Americans incompetent and have terminal Alzheimer's? The reality is that the source code doesn't matter much. Any decent coder could write just about anything you have ever seen. It just takes time. The few really good and obscure software ideas are usually locked up tight, if a company has any. More to the point, why aren't they on a casual friend basis with someone they claim was given unfettered access? Seems like he'd be on the guest list to all their parties and they could just ask him themselves.

    3. Re: Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because in the US he could sue them for discrimination AND WIN.

    4. Re: Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by quenda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because in the US he could sue them for discrimination AND WIN.

      I see. Google tells me that "national origin" is a protected class in US federal employment discrimination law. Also citizenship status.
      This seems foolish.
      Is there really no exception for bona fide security concerns outside military contractors?

      You can be quite sure the Chinese would not allow westerners anywhere near their corporate secrets.

    5. Re:Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      There is a reason to employ the individual, get that data, there is a reason to fire the individual, well they copied proprietary secrets from the previous company, after we have that data, why should we continue to trust them, they are very likely to do the same to us.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also SOP (Standard Operating Procedrure) for China. Lawsuit, schmawsuit, they don't care as US jurisdiction /rulings can go hop - the "come over here and enforce it" taunt.
      And sloppy on Tesla's part for developing at speed over any concern for security.

    7. Re: Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Blocking people from jobs because of where they were born or their heritage is taking us right back to the 1930s.

      As it happens Chinese companies do allow westerners near their secrets. Plenty of jobs for foreign engineers over there. They are also getting into open source, e.g. Creality has open sourced both the software and hardware for its very popular range of 3D printers.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by jittles · · Score: 2

      Because in the US he could sue them for discrimination AND WIN.

      I see. Google tells me that "national origin" is a protected class in US federal employment discrimination law. Also citizenship status. This seems foolish. Is there really no exception for bona fide security concerns outside military contractors?

      You can be quite sure the Chinese would not allow westerners anywhere near their corporate secrets.

      You have no idea how absurd it is. I used to do work for the DoD that required US Citizenship. Was I allowed to ask people in an interview if they were US citizens? Nope. It was illegal. Never mind that the type of work we did required citizenship by law. We would have to find clever ways to determine if they were citizens. This is why most of those DoD jobs require active clearances to already be in the possession of the applicant.

      To be clear, I don't really care where someone is from and it would not usually factor into my decision on whether or not to hire them. In that particular case, I had no choice but to hire US citizens, though. Anyone else I hired wouldn't have been allowed in our building. AT least, that particular building we were working out of.

    9. Re: Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      can confirm, worked 2 years in Shenyang up north, had full run of office and resources, they were rather naive when it comes to security

      lol the real security is that you'd have to know chinese yourself to even make sense of it

    10. Re:Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before making any assumptions as you do, please read the law suit before going further.

      He could have simply been taking his work home with him... could have. That he could do such a thing shows their poor security and ability to protect their own supposed trade secrets. He did it for over a year and not just before he left the company.

      That would all depend on the contract he signed whether or not the company allowed him to work off site. I highly doubt that any sane company would allow that anyway. So this is not a reason.

      Also why would he really want to demonstrate the poor security? If he really wanted that, he would have reported the flaw long ago. Why would he did the back up the whole library since he started working (from April 2017)? Well, 300,000 files+directories won't take a couple days to copy and back up, will they? Besides, it looks like you need to log into the company's network to do that. So I doubt you can to leave your computer connected and leave the company. It is too obvious. Furthermore, if you are going to argue that he might have done it but the company didn't mention about it, then the law suit wouldn't exist. Why? Because it doesn't make sense at all (you should know what I meant).

      Even more evidence of his behavior, you should look at #32 in the law suit. Any one who can think critically should be able to make a time line and see something is way out of normal behavior. Just to give any who think the guy should be given a benefit of the doubt.

    11. Re:Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, how about I force you to inhale my semen until you violently choke to death on my Adonis sperm?

      We can do this confidentially, it makes it easier to hide the embarrassment from your family. So sperm gobblers can't claim they didn't want to be forced to eat cum, which in fact the entire them they were just craving that protein. It would also make it easier to bury your man juice gobbling corpse.

    12. Re:Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt it - Work from home at my company is you VPN into the corp network from your company laptop. It is 100% not approved to put company data onto a personal device.

    13. Re:Only demonstrates their own systemic problems. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would Tesla have ever allowed a Chinese national near their trade secrets?

      Because they are sane and likely agree that just because someone has black hair and yellow skin doesn't make them an undercover spy?

  7. Don't worry guise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't be too worried about this "theft." That source code is a huge trojan horse anyway, if I ever seen one. How many times has Tesla autopilot caused crashes, deaths, and mayhem so far?

    If China wants to bring Skynet Terminator robots running loose in their country without updates, bug fixes, and support from the original developers, they are going to reap all that is coming to them. Good luck, have fun!

    1. Re:Don't worry guise... by LetterRip · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wouldn't be too worried about this "theft." That source code is a huge trojan horse anyway, if I ever seen one. How many times has Tesla autopilot caused crashes, deaths, and mayhem so far?

      Autopilot is a different code base from the self-driving. Autopilot is a lane keeping and adaptive cruise control that doesn't have anything to do with their self-driving code.

    2. Re:Don't worry guise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet, it likely does a better job than you do.

    3. Re:Don't worry guise... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually they are the same code base. For example Tesla uses machine vision to provide blind spot warnings using the side cameras, which is also used by the self driving code to know when the neighbouring lane is clear.

      They are incrementally adding the features they need to get to full self driving, such as the ability to read traffic lights and road signs. Those features become available in the level 2 driving aids for live beta testing by their customers. That is their stated plan - let customers test the tech and train the AI.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  8. Poor 110010001000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plenty of companies create EVs. Problem is, that everybody wants to buy a superior vehicle that is also a superior value. And that is Tesla. It is not the crap that others like you seem to push.

    1. Re: Poor 110010001000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The car that provides optional features that kill people is the superior vehicle?

      Okey dokey, Gomer!

      After making such a stupid statement there is no need to reply further other than note how dumb you are,point, laugh. Laughing at you, not with you.

      Real car company EV are coming online in the next 2 years. The only question is which of the big makers will pick up Tesla in a firesale. My guess is Ford because they need a jump start into this market although they have a hybrid mustang coming so maybe not. Toyota? No. GM? Maybe. BMW? No chance. Mercedes already has superior driving tech so no. Nissan? Not their style. Mazda is headed another way with new ICE tech and still working on rotary engines.

      No one I can think of really needs Tesla tech. Will probably just die and go away.

    2. Re: Poor 110010001000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. You must be one of the retards. Tesla is saving lives. Fewer ppl have died running Tesla AP than would have driving themselves.
      You must be 110010001000.

    3. Re: Poor 110010001000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not binary person. I am not a retard (you are a bigot for using that word), I have never bought or sold Tesla stock.

      You have zero evidence Tesla has saved a single life. It is public fact that Tesla has driven people into concrete barriers and other solid objects resulting in their death.

      Hint: just stop, you are not scoring any debate points here. Even dumb Rei does a better job.

    4. Re:Poor 110010001000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, that everybody wants to buy a superior vehicle that is also a superior value.

      Until you get into a fender bender and need to have it repaired. Then you're going to be pulling out the big bucks.

      https://cleantechnica.com/2018/05/20/heres-what-7000-of-damage-looks-like-on-a-tesla-model-3/

      Seriously $7000 for a minor dent? I'm not sure I see the "superior value" here. Its a value until you realize the exterior of the car is pretty much an eggshell and if you bust anything on it, watch out, you're going to be paying out the nose(or your insurance is).

      It gets even worse, this poor guy had his Model 3 backed into https://forums.tesla.com/forum/forums/ridiculous-cost-and-time-repair-model-3

      What I did not expect was that it would take the insurance nearly a month of having my car at the shop before they decided to let me know that the cost will be $16,000+ AND i would not receive my car from the shop for AT LEAST another 7 weeks. Having had my car sit there for almost 4 weeks without any information every time I called was frustrating and that is on the insurance provider but Tesla taking "3-5 weeks" to deliver some fenders is honestly ridiculous.

      $16k worth of damage and weeks worth of waiting with your car in the shop? Thats insane.

      I'd much rather buy a car with a well supported pipeline of spare parts and a good geographic spread of service centers.

      Also there is the whole matter regarding the stability of Tesla as a company.

      Will they be there in 5 years when something breaks and I need to get a replacement part?

      I say this as someone who really, really likes the idea of owning a Tesla, but the costs of any potential repairs is a turnoff. We'll also ignore the fact that Tesla's are some of the most expensive vehicles to insure, due to the cost of repairs. I have a hard time seeing the real value at this point.

  9. Tesla advertises gift of Autopilot code to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alternatively, we could view this as yet another example of the "false protest" as USA gives China a leg up to help equalize the world. For instance, the only reason that China is a dominant force in manufacturing for USA is that USA wrongly classifies Thorium as a nuclear source material (you can't make a bomb out of Thorium, not even a dirty one, it's not very radioactive when dispersed). Thorium is found as in all rare earth mineral depositis, such as neodymium and dysprosium. Rare earth minerals are essential for making all "high tech" stuff, everything from smartphone glass to vehicle alternators. But in the USA the Thorium Regulations cause our rare earth mining operations to be very expensive. Meanwhile China leaves giant piles of Thorium just laying around (it's heavy, won't wash away, doesn't pollute... doesn't bind to organic chemistry so pollution yields little to no absorption into ecosystem).

    So, there's no real reason not to leave it laying around, but in USA it has to be separated carefully and then stowed back underground in the mine... Manufacturing moves near source material. It would be trivial for USA to deregulate Thorium (at least remove it from nuclear source material classification), and in one fell swoop this would bring rare earth mining competition to China (which now has a near defacto monopoly on rare earths). That single executive order would "Make America Great Again" (at manufacturing), if that were really Trump's goal... but politics is a game to distract fools from how the world really works.

    In the 1960's Thorium Reactors were invented in the USA ostensibly to create a power supply for large planes to fly non-stop. Nixon was told to back Uranium fuel because it yields Plutonium needed for "nuclear weapons", instead of the much safer Thorium Reactor... Now China is being allowed to develop Thorium Energy reactors ahead of USA. This is all by design, folks. The "we're actually enemies" shtick is just to quell the restless locals who would object to USA deliberately allowing China to beat USA both in terms of manufacturing and new energy technology (this is the real reason the energy sector is languishing). The aim these past decades has been to bring China out of 2nd world and solidify China as a 1st world nation. This is true "globalism" - i.e., hold some nations back so that the others can prosper.

    In a similar vein, USA gifted VHS to Japan then made it the standard as one of the many efforts to (re)build Japan's post-war economy.

    The real lever of power is the distribution and release of technological progress. There is more technology developed in secret and waiting in the wings, such as Thorium Reactors or other sources of energy (Tesla was correct when he said we were just swimming in a sea of electricity -- his towers did not pump electricity to the world, Tesla's Towers just harnessed the electrical potential that exists in thin upper airs). So, color me nonplussed if yet another innovation has essentially been gifted to China while we ineffectually kvetch about it via useless court room antics. We're doing this shit on purpose. Wake me when they're a competitor for something important, like Atmospheric Energy Collection.

  10. Re:Poor Rei by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who let the retards out?

  11. I would NEVER trust Zoox by Drunkulus · · Score: 1

    They could not do a simple thing like get me a date, then they charged me for an extra month. No way am I gonna let them drive my car.

  12. imagine using an App to drive a car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it is kind of amusing to imagine a future where cars are controlled by desktop applications. Especially an app that runs on a proprietary system like Windows or macOS. Things are going smoothly, you are traveling down the highway at 65 mph when suddenly: "There is a software update, please click OK to continue."

    Oh, but surely the application designers would turn off that feature, right? Or they might use something open source like Linux, but then they might not get the proper hardware drivers that they need to operate the camera system, or the video cards. Speaking of which, are they using commodity hardware for these cars? At some point they will need to lock in the hardware configuration, if the system is using object recognition it had better have some well tested performance before anyone should let it drive half a ton of metal down a busy street. There can't be any of this: "The car crashed because there was a defective video card."

    So what, exactly, are those fools at Uber and Google and Zoox doing with these self-driving projects? It all seems like a joke, because if they were anywhere close to a working technology then there would be secondary ripples in the technology market, there would be a boost for hardware manufacturers offering the most reliable products. Are we really supposed to believe that the first generation of true self-driving cars will be controlled by desktop computers with USB cameras and sensors?

  13. H1B labor is only cheap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if your intellectual property is worthless.

  14. What do you expect hiring a Chinese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh. Do you ever expect an amoral communist to care about ethics or obeying OUR laws? The only law that a Chinese person follows is to be loyal to the party. I guess that this generation is to blinded by dancing, singing, drugs, and 'reality shows' to have learned ANYTHING about Communism.

    1. Re:What do you expect hiring a Chinese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think China is *communist*? How sweet!

  15. Guangzhi Cao Stole? From US? To Chinese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noooo. Yes? Whodathunk!

  16. Wonderful! by fozzy1015 · · Score: 2

    Now Chinese cars can drive you into barriers and the back of fire trucks. At least this one found the hole: https://www.zerohedge.com/news...

    1. Re:Wonderful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that...

      Expand your first statement to receive remote commands via cellular... Now essentially, you're life is in your Governments hands in one of these.

      Not towing the party line? Extremely late on your debts? Interfering with competitive business, and your rival just happens to be politically connected?

      Nah. This isn't a dystopian nightmare brought to reality at all....

    2. Re:Wonderful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not towing the party line?

      It's "toeing". No, "tow the line" was never a real thing, no matter how many pseudointellectual waterheads try to "well in the navy you're towing a line bla bla bla", it was never that. It's "toeing".

  17. just post the code - open source it by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 1

    just post the code, open source it -- come on Elon.. be more open about it.. think about the safety benefits you can gain from the whole world knowing how it works... you can be like the movies;; Hackers (Fisher Stevens as Eugene), Antitrust (Tim Robbins as Winston)...

  18. Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REMOVE CHOPSTICK.

  19. And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The faux self driving badly named auto pilot stuff is lane assist and variable cruise control. CC is hardly advanced science. Tesla lane assist has resulted in several deaths.

    If they stole this tech they got nothing worth having. It is usually better to write your own than try to fix someone elses known fucked up code. If it was easy to fix then Tesla already would have.

    This is a faux news story posted because /. as revenue is missing target for the month and they only have a week left to catch up. Expect more zero value click bait until end of the month.

  20. Re: Only demonstrates their own systemic problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because their corporate secrets are written in English?

  21. Re: Only demonstrates their own systemic problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sir are taking out of your bum.

  22. Re:Tesla advertises gift of Autopilot code to Chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no thorium reactors, buddy. They are the same uranium reactors, except that the uranium is produced by worsening the neutron economy so that the thorium is transmuted into uranium by a part of the neutron flux. The produced uranium then burns.

    It is an awful idea, because you get a lot more radioactive waste than in the usual reactors, and the produced isotopes are the same as those coming out of a "normal", uranium reactor. It is also less efficient, more complex and what not.

    And it is only a concept, and not a "technology".

    Except among the less literate, who aggregate on /.

  23. citizenship is not a protected class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citizenship status is not a protected class. It can be a BFOQ (Bona Fide Occupational Qualification) - the notable example would be if you're hiring someone to work with export controlled information (ITAR, in particular). It is perfectly legal to have a hiring requirement of "US Person Only" or "US Citizen Only" (the former includes legal permanent residents, aka Green Card holders).

    national origin most certainly is something on which you cannot discriminate - it's not a "protected class" per se (like "female")

    1. Re:citizenship is not a protected class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not hire anyone that has recently (any time in their life) been in China. Not discrimination because a white guy would face the same fate.

    2. Re:citizenship is not a protected class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citizenship status is not a protected class.

      Maybe on a federal level, but on the state level that is not always true:

      https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/new-york-employment-discrimination-31665.html/
      https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/california-employment-discrimination-31690.html/

      as two examples.

  24. Re: Tesla advertises gift of Autopilot code to Chi by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    It is an awful idea, because you get a lot more radioactive waste than in the usual reactors

    That's an interesting claim. Everything I've read says the opposite; that they produce far less waste. I don't suppose you have any citations.

  25. If I'm on the jury, I vote against Tesla... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the crime of being stupid scummy sellouts. No jury should encourage this level of foolish-on-steroids in corporate America by finding in favor of Tesla - any society gets more of whatever it rewards, and sees less of what ir punishes.

    They hire a Chinese engineer, almost certainly in place of an American engineer, and give him access to all their stuff - and then they are SHOCKED that he steals it and plans to go live well off the ill-gotten gains back home in China?

    Nobody is that stupid legitimately; you really have to put your greed into overdrive, flush your patriotism down the toilet, and probably smoke enough weed to reduce your IQ down into the mid 50s.

  26. Data Leak Prevention. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a company's budget and effort on maintaining the security for a claimed "millions of dollars" of intellectual property is practically zero or otherwise worthless, because they do nothing to keep this all stored with appropriate security, then isn't whining about it after it gets taken a bit like storing all your money on the ground in front of your house, and then getting all butt-hurt when someone comes along and takes it?

    This seems more like a cheap way to modern forced indenture to keep wages of key employees down, by accusing anyone who takes their knowledge gained "on the job" and leaves for another company that then competes with them, and steals their talent.

  27. Re:Tesla advertises gift of Autopilot code to Chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China brings ideas to market very quickly.

    People were tired of waiting 20 years while the suits fight each other and try to wait out the inventors.

    Now the tech comes in 5 years or less.

  28. Re:Tesla advertises gift of Autopilot code to Chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And thorium can be transmuted to fissile material.

    Japan's bomb project was based on this.

    That's why it's controlled.

  29. Re:Tesla advertises gift of Autopilot code to Chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Posting as anon due to moderation.
    According to wikipedia there have been thorium based reactors. It is indeed a reactor type that uses Thorium (and neutrons) to produce uranium. The development took place at the beginning of nuclear era and another path was then taken. There are some experimental projects going on in India I think. I am not a big fun of nuclear for number of practical and moral (*) reasons but the way things go in our hyperhysteric societies in the West with Holy Greta and other signs of the Armageddon coming etc we will have to produce base load with something.

    * - The plumbers and financial gurus should insure their business then I have no problem. As it is currently, if things go bad we all pay and said plumbers and financial gurus go away without liability. These are moral grounds I have. Practical issues I have with it could be possibly overcome but nobody gives a damn anyway.

  30. Foreign Employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how about those H1B employees!! Yay!!!

  31. Targeted theft of US tech by China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese government has a list of technologies it wants to acquire. They send PHD students to universities and engineers to companies with the sole purpose of stealing. Classic example of China's economic war with the West and Japan is how they cornered the rare earth metals market and then used it as a weapon.

  32. Hey look, another stupid talentless chink thief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that stinky chinky, why do all chinese smell like shit and why can't they actually invent anything unique?

    those stinky chinkys are only capable of stealing shit, just like mexicans.

    stupid chinese chinks - the mexicans of the east. You ugly wide faced thieving chinese cucks.

    1. Re:Hey look, another stupid talentless chink thief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid?

      Who's stupid?

      The Chinese for stealing secrets?

      Or the US for inviting them in and saying 'hey guys, here are all our secrets, but you pinky swear you won't steal them right?'

      Your racist blinds you to the truth.