Slashdot Mirror


Engineers Build Teeny-Tiny Bluetooth Transmitter That Runs On Less Than 1 Milliwatt (ieee.org)

Engineers at the University of Michigan have built the first millimeter-scale stand-alone device that meets Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) specifications. "Consuming just 0.6 milliwatts during transmission, it would broadcast for 11 years using a typical 5.8-mm coin battery," reports IEEE Spectrum. "Such a millimeter-scale BLE radio would allow these ant-sized sensors to communicate with ordinary equipment, even a smartphone." From the report: The transmitter chip, which debuted last month at IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, had to solve two problems. The first is power consumption, and the second is the size of the antenna. An ordinary transmitter circuit requires a tunable RF oscillator to generate the frequency, a power amplifier to boost its amplitude, and an antenna to radiate the signal. The Michigan team combined the oscillator and the antenna in a way that made the amplifier unnecessary. They called their invention a power oscillator. The key part of an oscillator is the resonant tank circuit: an inductor and a capacitor. Energy sloshes back and forth between the inductor's magnetic field and the capacitor's electric field at a resonant frequency determined by the capacitance and inductance. In the new circuit, the team used the antenna itself as the inductor in the resonant tank. Because it was acting as an inductor, the antenna radiated using changing magnetic field instead of an electric field; that meant it could be more compact.

However, size wasn't the only thing. Quality factor, or Q, is a dimensionless quantity that basically says how efficient your resonator is. As a 14-mm long loop of conductor, the antenna was considerably larger than an on-chip inductor for a millimeter-scale radio could be. That led to a Q was that was about five times what an on-chip inductor would deliver. Though it was a much more efficient solution, in order to meet BLE specifications, the team needed a better way to power the power oscillator. Their solution was to build an on-chip transformer into the circuit that supplies power to it. The transformer looks like two nested coils. One coil is attached to the supply voltage end of the oscillator circuit, and the other is attached to ground side. Pumping the transformer at a frequency twice that of the power amplifier wound up efficiently boosting the flow of power to the antenna.

43 comments

  1. Key word: would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It *would* run for 11 years off that tiny battery. The key word is "would". The battery will discharge and degrade just as fast, on its own, with no load.

    1. Re:Key word: would by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Highly unlikely. They should maintain their nominal voltage for well over 10 years unused. This shit is real.

      However horrifying.

    2. Re: Key word: would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fail. A mm-sized device with a coin-size battery? The inventor was seen earlier riding an electric scooter towing a semi trailer with batteries behind it.

    3. Re: Key word: would by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Battery size isn't mandatory.

      PS: I don't actually know how big this thing is, you'd think they could have mentioned the size in such a long summary about something that stands out from the crowd due to its size, but nooooooo. Welcome to Slashdot.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re: Key word: would by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I already have coin cells that power ble for a shorter period, so why is this so surprising?

      The power levels they mention make the claims realistic using fairly standard coin cells.

    5. Re: Key word: would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it cheap? doesn't matter that it's "too small" if it works doesn't it?

      I for one would like to know if a Bluetooth keyboard using this lasts for long on a coin battery. Or a mouse on coin cell or AAA. Can it do Logitech 2.4GHz?
      Can it use a tiny solar panel and a capacitor and have infinite battery life?

      Can you transfer a megabyte?

      Reminder that absurdly low power client computers are undeveloped (and like, how come I had infinitely more fun with a 1989 Game Boy than with GHz Android junk)
      Imagine a dedicated word processor / pocket computer with keyboard, e-ink or other low power display, MRAM and BLE technology. I don't care that it runs at 33 MHz or something

  2. Great! It will fit inside my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can you hear me NOW!?!?

    1. Re:Great! It will fit inside my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is that you APK?

    2. Re:Great! It will fit inside my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you hear me NOW!?!?

      Your ass!

    3. Re:Great! It will fit inside my ass. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That already exists. https://www.amazon.de/Lovense-...

    4. Re:Great! It will fit inside my ass. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If that is your goal, on youtube you can find Naomi Wu doing a review of a "prison cell phone."

      Better range than BLE.

  3. Range? by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

    FTA: "magnetic field instead of an electric field; that meant it could be more compact".

    IIRC an antenna's magnetic field intensity falls off as the cube of distance, whereas the electric field falls off as the square. I'd be interested to know how the range of this new tech compares with a more traditional transmitter having similar output power.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re: Range? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's still using EM(photons), this is just the internal circuitry powering the antenna.

    2. Re:Range? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Um, you can't have one without the other. They are simply talking about the near field, in the far field it's classical behavior.

    3. Re: Range? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on trying to make a pertinent comment while we all talk about teeny-tiny genitalia.

    4. Re:Range? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Both fall with the square of distance, a no brainer. There is nothing to "IIRC" ... as in recall. Just use a piece of paper and draw it up ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Range? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC an antenna's magnetic field intensity falls off as the cube of distance

      The intensity fall off isn't some magic thing that happens.

      Think of it as distributing grains on an area. With a small area the density is high, with a large area the density is low.
      The area is the sides squared so if you increase both sides the grain density falls of with the square.

      Radio signals (and other waves) will travel in a straight line away from the emitter. (As long as they don't hit anything.)
      Since the distance of all points in the wave is the same from the center point you get a circular expansion. (Or a spherical if it happens in a volume.)

      Since the surface area of the sphere expands with the square of the radius the signal intensity has to fall off with the square of the distance.

      With this in mind you don't need to "recall correctly". It should be fairly straightforward to realize that the magnetic field also falls off as a square of the distance.

      One might believe that directional antennas would mean that you had no fall off but to my knowledge no-one has ever been able to direct a signal in a line shape.
      Directional antennas are at best shaping the signal into a spherical segment so you still have a fall off by the square.

    6. Re:Range? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Actually both will fall with the cube of the distance. The problem is you do need to use your brain since the fields react differently between near field, far field and depending how the source of the radiation is setup.

      If you don't use your brain at all then the GP was correct. Magnetic fields will fall off with the cube of the distance always. But then magnetic dipoles don't radiate and therefore don't generate a far-field response. If you think about it more then they are even more correct since the magnetic field here is used to charge an inductor within the device, they aren't talking about far-field and both magnetic or electric fields presented here would follow the inverse cube law.

    7. Re:Range? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Actually both will fall with the cube of the distance.
      That is correct, I copy pasted the wrong word, no idea why I wanted to copy cube, though, I guess I sometimes write qube ....

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  4. All the better to spy on you with, my dear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great. So now we know they can build even smaller little spy toys to listen in on us.

  5. Re: Great! It will fit inside my ass... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I am HOSTing cocks and balls at the truck stop... apk

  6. Pff... that's nothing! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno why these Michigan bros are so excited. I mean, I talked to a homeless guy that told me all about how he had fillings that had microphones, their own power source and wireless transmitter. On top of that, they were installed over a decade ago. Seriously, these guys are behind the curve. ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  7. Nothing new under the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They called their invention a power oscillator."

    Sounds very much like the way the old regenerative radio receivers worked, if I am not mistaken... Using the antenna as an inductor in the resonator circuit... If the regeneration was cranked up, the receiver turned into a transmitter.

    1. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.. Look into the design of 315Mhz and 433Mhz transmitters. Same thing. Nothing new. Antenna and LC tank is one and the same. Still it's very low power; that's impressive. Combine with some of the low power 430 CPUs that TI makes and you have something. I wonder if the antenna/loop cam be made very directional? Then it would useful. As the transmit power is all in the direction you need it.

    2. Re:Nothing new under the sun by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      NSA Playset https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Wonder what TINYALAMO software with BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) and allowed keystroke surveillance and injection did?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Nothing new under the sun by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lol, I love it when young engineers "discover" decades old designs. Hell regenerative receivers are past the century mark now. Next up for discovery is the gunn diode and unijunction transistor. They are gonna shit themselves when they discover thin clients for the third time.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    4. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I think this is a pulse power amplifier after the resonator circuit, driven at 2x frequency.

      So fairly different, though both do use an inductor.

    5. Re:Nothing new under the sun by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Lol, I love it when young engineers "discover" decades old designs

      They built a hell of a thing. It's incredibly small and incredibly low power.

      But this is slashdot: the lace where the incompetent love to shit arrogantly on the competent.

      Hell regenerative receivers are past the century mark now.

      This is more involved than "simply" a transmitter with ositive feedback.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Nothing new under the sun by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I think shitting arrogantly is the only pleasure some people have in life. Sad.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Nothing new under the sun by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

      Well, that and taking the moral high ground.

      (and arguing about the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow)

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    8. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The engineers knows that this is a non-story.
      However, marketers are gonna market. The school requires headlines and by inflating a non-story to a story you get those.

      Don't direct the blame at the engineers, they are just playing the game.
      Instead, point out that the University of Michigan doesn't have enough original research and tries to compensate with implementations of old research.

    9. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      African or European?

  8. Key word: could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They actually make button cell batteries with different chemistry for long life. Instead of CR2045 for example, I think it is BR2045, or something like that. The regular ones have the properties they do because of the exigencies of economics, NOT the constraints imposed by battery technology, chemistry, or physics.

    In fact, most promising technologies reported in the press that never reach production fail not because they cannot work at all or fail to deliver as promised, living up to expectations, but rather they end up economically infeasible for some one reason, or more likely literally dozens of reasons.

    1. Re:Key word: could by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They actually make button cell batteries with different chemistry for long life.

      Several, actually.

      The poster child is Lithium Thionyl Chloride. (LiSOCl2)

      Ten years or better in service. -55C to +85C (or still higher with a slightly tweaked chemistry.) Enormous capacity. (A size-D is 19 amphours at about 3.6V)

      It's what they use in things like EPIRBs, underwater drones, and long life or extreme temperature IoT package tracking / environment monitoring tags.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  9. Teeny tiny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for keeping it scientific, guys.

  10. Re:Your "impersonation" of me proves 1 thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    impersonation != satire/ridicule

  11. Re:Your "impersonation" of me proves 1 thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still more stupidity from you. Grow up.

  12. Great. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Even more connection issues with Bluetooth. Just what the world needs.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  13. Re: Your "impersonation" of me proves 1 thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You freak, why are you constantly bragging about your debased activities?