Slashdot Mirror


In Massive Breach, Ex-NSA Contractor Pleads Guilty to Hoarding Highly Classified Secrets (usatoday.com)

"A former National Security Agency contractor on Thursday pleaded guilty to stealing secret defense information over two decades in what legal experts have described as the biggest breach of classified information in U.S. history."

Long-time Slashdot reader mencik quotes USA Today: In his plea deal in U.S. District Court in Baltimore, Harold Thomas Martin III admitted to removing highly classified digital and hard copy documents, then storing them in his home and car from the late 1990s through 2016. Prosecutors say there is no indication Martin ever shared the stolen secrets. His defense attorneys say he simply hoarded the information... One of his lawyers previously described Martin as a "compulsive hoarder" who took home work documents...

Martin, who held multiple security clearances while working at government agencies as a private contractor, said he knew stealing the documents risked the country's security. He pleaded guilty on Thursday to one felony count of willful retention of national defense information. He could be sentenced to nine years in prison.

Martin also told a federal judge that he'd been diagnosed with ADHD. "His actions were the product of mental illness," his federal defenders' statement said. "Not treason."

82 comments

  1. We need FBI back on clearance duty by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, we need to drop all of these idiotic private companies doing clearance duty. We are getting far too many ppl that do not belong.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seriously, we need to drop all of these idiotic private companies doing clearance duty. We are getting far too many ppl that do not belong.

      Absolutely! The next thing you know, they'll be letting in idiots that won't even type out entire words! -_-

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re: We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not hitchhiking anymore. We're riding!

    3. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't US security clearances investigated and made by the Defense Security Service for DoD and by the Office of Personnel Management for government employees?

    4. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe some are. Some are not.
      https://www.nbcnews.com/news/i...

    5. Re: We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the executive branch does, and the President is responsible for all of it. Especially when the rest of the DoD says not to give your son in law top secret clearance and then you order them to give it to him anyway.

    6. Re: We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exact figures

    7. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by gweihir · · Score: 0

      Clearance is basically worthless. Anybody planted will get a clearance, the effort in planting them is just higher. Anybody else, they will just screen out the more competent and enterprising people, and hence decrease the skill on the position targeted with no security advantages whatsoever.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Clearance is basically worthless. Anybody planted will get a clearance

      The basic purpose of a clearance is to ensure the individual is not any easy mark for another country to exploit.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    9. Re: We need FBI back on clearance duty by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Nope. Private business does most of it now.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    10. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Nivag064 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, we need to drop all of these idiotic private companies doing clearance duty. We are getting far too many ppl that do not belong.

      Absolutely! The next thing you know, they'll be letting in idiots that won't even type out entire words! -_-

      Far worse, they may even elect a president, who has extreme difficulty typing a coherent sentence, and are proud of their ignorance!

    11. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Entrope · · Score: 1

      That's old information. The National Background Investigations Bureau has done most of the background investigations for a while, but NBIB is now moving that entire function to be part of the DoD.

    12. Re: We need FBI back on clearance duty by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Also make that they do not have loyality/tendancies to another nation, or at least understand how far it will go.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      from the late 1990s through 2016

      So the clinton FBI let him in and he stopped after the current president got in? Yeah lets blame trump!

    14. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearance is basically worthless. Anybody planted will get a clearance, the effort in planting them is just higher. Anybody else, they will just screen out the more competent and enterprising people, and hence decrease the skill on the position targeted with no security advantages whatsoever.

      Everyone should have to go through the same process. Want to run for office, and that office has access to classified information? Well you apply for the clearance before you run, and if you don't have it on day 1, you lose.

      This nonsense of Trump telling people to clear his family members against the best advice of the people in charge is so much worse than Hillary's email crap as to be in a completely other category. You are giving clearances to people that have financial entanglements that make them clearly easy to compromise.

      Some of the data hoarding and extracting classified information can be reduced by simply making it harder. No printers, save special permission and it being logged. No usb ports, etc.

    15. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by mi · · Score: 1

      Hillary Clinton was a government employee (as she's always been, as a matter of fact), when she did her part. Being a government official is no guarantee — you are just much harder to fire over it...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everyone should have to go through the same process. Want to run for office, and that office has access to classified information? Well you apply for the clearance before you run, and if you don't have it on day 1, you lose."

      You are confused, thats only true for 'little people'. Important people are on the 'our' side, they need no checks and balances.
      AHAHAHAH - fking shithole...

    17. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because it's you on the left who are the rational ones.
      hahahahahahahahahahahaha

    18. Re:We need FBI back on clearance duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you intend to do that? The Constitution allows people to run for office, it does not require they have a clearance to do so. What you are suggesting is prudent, but illegal.

      The President is the ultimate classification authority, he delegates the clearance process, but he is ultimately in control of the entire apparatus.

  2. biggest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until the next bigger biggest

    People who annoy you: baggers

  3. Not a crime by tomhath · · Score: 4, Funny

    He was just extremely careless. His record should be fully expunged.

    1. Re:Not a crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Taking home over 50TB of classified information is not careless. That's criminal.

    2. Re:Not a crime by BlueStrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Taking home over 50TB of classified information is not careless. That's criminal.

      He was extremely careless but there was no ill intent, no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

      Oh wait, he's not a corrupt and wealthy dynastic politician?

      Throw him under the toughest PMITA prison!

      After all, some animals are more equal than others.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    3. Re:Not a crime by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It is actually hilarious. Shows nicely what kind of people work for the TLAs and that they do not deserve any level of trust.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Not a crime by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't know if I'd go along with the defense reasoning that his actions are the result of a mental illness, but if they can't prove that he intended to share any of the information at any point, then charges of treason shouldn't stick either.

      However I can well imagine that willfully mishandling classified information (taking it home when you have no authority to do so) constitutes a crime under US law. Merely having classified info in your possession when you shouldn't certainly is a crime in my own country.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Not a crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed willfully mishandling classified information is a crime. If he's got a mental illness and didn't disclose it on his classified clearance applications that also has consequences. If he had any potential foreign ties he'd probably be in solitary confinement. If he was a general or other type of bigwig he'd get a slap on the wrist. So it'll be interesting to see what happens to somebody in the middle of that spectrum.

    6. Re:Not a crime by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Not careless at all but all preplanned, it was employment insurance. With the US rabid dog eat rabid dog (healthy dogs do not eat each other) economy, anything goes. So simply stick piling core proprietary designs and engineering to take to their new company, should they ever be let go from the current company, so inter company espionage and not foreign espionage. It's the sort of thing you would expect in an extremely corrupt system, everyone is hedging their bets, ready to turn on each other, at the drop of a dime. I'll bet there is a whole bunch of extortion going on in the US war industrial complex, as the corrupt and incompetent seek to keep their positions. Building up extortion material to keep their job, to gain promotions, to shift corporations for a bigger piece of the pie. The whole war industrial complex is being run on corruption and this is the kind of behaviour you should expect and it will get much worse.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    7. Re:Not a crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's got a mental illness and didn't disclose it on his classified clearance applications that also has consequences.

      Perhaps he wasn't mentally ill at the time of his application? Perhaps the job caused his mental illness? Back when the CIA was experimenting with LSD, there are known cases where one CIA employee drugged another CIA employee and caused the drugged employee to go crazy. Someone even jumped out the window of a tall building to his death after getting LSD'ed.

      Also, the nature of mental illness could in itself preclude him from disclosing mental illness on his application. There are plenty of mentally ill people who swear up and down that they are not mentally ill and they may even be highly convincing, until you investigate further or actually get to know the person.

      Honestly, there are loads of people in government, corporations, etc that probably haven't been clinically diagnosed as being mentally ill yet are arguably mentally ill.

    8. Re:Not a crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he wasn't mentally ill at the time of his application?

      While I doubt his mental status changed, he was still obligated to disclose any changes in status that would effect his clearance such as diagnosed mental illness, bankruptcy, foreign contacts and so forth. If he was never diagnosed or sought treatment then I would consider mental illness a weak defense. He'd have to prove he wasn't mentally healthy enough to be aware of the consequences of his actions and yet his illness was undetectable by himself or others.

  4. ADHD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Martin also told a federal judge that he'd been diagnosed with ADHD. "His actions were the product of mental illness," '

    How is an 'inability to sit still' in any way the cause of improper handling of classified data? Do we all have a get-out-of-jail-free card that we didn't know about?

    1. Re: ADHD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It annoys the fuck out of me that he is trying to use this as an excuse, being diagnosed with a similar condition myself. Am I now suspect because this idiot blames his criminal behaviour on ADHD? It isn't a mental illness anyway, it's a neurological variation.

      Add 2 years to his sentence for making this pathetic excuse as far as I'm concerned.

  5. Onion/magnet link anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta get that info out while it's still possible!

    NSA: America's enemy number one.

  6. What about OUR data? by oic0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this the same thing they tell us they do with our data? they just collect it all, but outside of official work against terrorists and stuff, they are just holding it and doing nothing with it right?

    1. Re: What about OUR data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who laughs last? Ha! Lol! Not funny?

  7. What about their ADHD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, the government suffers from ADHD.

  8. Not an excuse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if that was downloaded from piratebay, then it would be doing them a favor.

  9. Hillary Clinton begs to differ by melted · · Score: 0, Troll

    > Taking home over 50TB of classified information is not careless. That's criminal.

    Hillary Clinton begs to differ

    1. Re:Hillary Clinton begs to differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you're wrong. She had a few emails within terabytes of data that had a few minor nits. This guy had the serious crap that can get people killed. But don't let that stop you from blindly hating hilliary, loving donald (who granted clearances overriding Kelly to both J&I who use WhatsApp to communicate) and whatever else you trumpites do to keep you happy at the klan rallies.

    2. Re:Hillary Clinton begs to differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt Clinton had anywhere to store 50TB of anything.

    3. Re:Hillary Clinton begs to differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're wrong. She had a few emails within terabytes of data that had a few minor nits.

      James Comey disagrees. Hundreds of classified and top secret e-mails, not "a few" and not "minor nits". Even then, Mr. Comey stated:

      To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

      The ONLY reason Hillary was excused was because she was politically connected. People with the same level of violations would have faced security and administrative sanctions, at a minimum. Per James Comey.

      But there are two sets of rules - one for the common people, and one for the politically connected...

    4. Re:Hillary Clinton begs to differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Comey and the rest of the senior intel officials were pretty much in Clinton's pocket.

      FBI too - now even the Dems realize that if they are getting into hot water with city/state police, they should run to the FBI - see Smollett.

  10. No problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These documents are for China!

  11. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowden leaks showed that NSA = NAS for any entity, especially a state actor, that can plant a [sub]contractor.

  12. Terabytes of information is much! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its massive reading of classified information (i believe that it is not confidential, it may have black bars) is equivalent to hundreds of months of intense readings ...

    It could result an illness as the ADHD for any people that tries to do this massive job.

  13. But that would be OMGCOMMUNISM!!1eeven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta over-fulfil Mussolini's dream, and turn the entire state into a network of private for-profit corporations! Aka privatization. Literally aka fascism. (Look up the origins!)

    1. Re: But that would be OMGCOMMUNISM!!1eeven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The origins? Okay, it would be pretty neat to have high-ranking politicians flanked by lictors.

  14. Mental illness vs domestic spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why is mental illness an excuse but revealing a wholesale federal domestic spying operation isn't.

    1. Re:Mental illness vs domestic spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't waste your keypresses. "Patriots" that still think Snowden is a traitor aren't about to let reason or logic sway their thinking now.

  15. But They Deserve The Keys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, this is a reputable organization that deserves encryption keys to absolutely everyone's private electronic correspondence.

    In fact let's give them to every Three Letter Agency. No, we only have to give them out to one. Then that one will leak them to every TLA, then from there to local police departments, then from there to by-law offices, then from there to news organizations. Then from there to the Russians, the Israelis, the Iranians, the North Koreans, the South Africans, then...

    Eventually every tag on every dog and cat will have the encryption keys permanently engraved on the back. Just to make sure they don't get lost. Safe and secure!

  16. Being negligent (not careful) with it is a crime by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the US, it is a crime to negligently allow it to leave the proper secured systems. Negligent means "not being careful". One recent example of someone who was prosecuted is a Navy sailor who sent home a selfie - aboard ship. The interior of US Navy ships are classified.

    A manager who carries papers around in a briefcase could be prosecuted for accidentally leaving a classified document in their briefcase and taking it home. With the security clearance comes a legal duty to be careful - to check that all of the classified documents are removed before taking a briefcase home.

  17. Another Booz Allen Hamilton breach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guy was employed there same time Edward Snowden was. I wonder if Snowden discovered his document stash and simply turned copies of that over to Greenwald/Poitras? It make more sense getting from a single source than him being a uber hacker getting into a bunch of different NSA systems undetected. I previously thought that Snowden might have gotten his documents from a Booz Allen director who previously worked as former director or dept. director, I can't remember exactly) of the NSA since lot of the released Snowden document are power point presentations rather than raw intel, which is the kind of the data that executives are more likely to possess. Of course with oligarch Pierre Omidyar putting the kibosh on any further Snowden leaks (less than 2% estimated leaked), we'll never know for sure.

    I think document hoarding amongst former intelligence personnel or contractors is more commonplace than previously thought, particularly if familiarity with various intel projects would be of use in their next security job.

  18. Re:Being negligent (not careful) with it is a crim by fafalone · · Score: 1

    Well you can't blame people for being confused when 'negligent' and 'extremely careless' mean different things. Of course then again Comey did basically say anyone else would be prosecuted for the same thing.

  19. Attention Deficit Disorder a Myth by iggymanz · · Score: 0

    ADHD is an invented disease to excuse the behavior of hyperactive unruly kids, and now thieving NSA contractors

    1. Re: Attention Deficit Disorder a Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with having high energy levels, it requires no excuses. Making such a child sit in a classroom 6 hours a day should be considered criminal abuse.

    2. Re:Attention Deficit Disorder a Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ADHD is an invented disease to excuse the behavior of hyperactive unruly kids, and now thieving NSA contractors

      Autism is an invented disease to excuse cunts like you posting on Slashdot.

    3. Re:Attention Deficit Disorder a Myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of whether or not it's invented, many people do have a greater than average inability to pay attention or sit still, making it unduly difficult to participate in society as we have organized it, and thus medication is often the lesser of two evils, as it allows kids like myself to not sit on the margins of a society that is not designed for how their brains work

    4. Re: Attention Deficit Disorder a Myth by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      so it's still not a disease then

  20. All Are Equal Before The Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Hillary Clinton was able to get off scot-free then this guy should get the same.

    I'm not even an American!

  21. Why you lie again WindBourne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you get tired of all those lies and made up stuff?

  22. Lying constantly WindBourne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already see how far you go.

  23. Re:Agreed, which tells me 1 thing... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God job - hahah you must have said something right to get -1 score - you stepped on someone toes. My bet would be

    She's got "blackmail dirt" and
    Unbelievable how "shit REALLY works" out there. Disgusting!

    Disgusting indeed. Assholes pretending to be 'honest/hardworking/blahblahblah' while in reality its a corrupted nontransparent shithole.

  24. ADHD, really? by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

    Mother fucker *I* have ADHD too. I've never tried to use it as a goddamn excuse in court though. Wtf people. Grow the hell up.

    --
    Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
    1. Re:ADHD, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no way you'd be able to focus on anything with 50TB of work.
      Then again that might be why he ended up with that much, could focus on anything, always had to bring more.

    2. Re:ADHD, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no way you'd be able to focus on anything with 50TB of work.
      Then again that might be why he ended up with that much, could focus on anything, always had to bring more.

      Not being able to focus is a myth, we just can't control our focus or where it lies.
      I'm ADHD and have bouts of pathological hyperfocus, I know of other ADHD folks whom have them as well.

      Think: Focusing on reading, say an entire novel series over a weekend, foregoing pretty much everything else.

      The guy and his attorney(s) are assholes for associating ADHD with mental illness.

    3. Re:ADHD, really? by fieldstone · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have ADHD also, and I study psychology. A learning disability is technically "mental illness", but no it didn't make anyone steal anything.

  25. 1990's...why you so clueless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it because you never bother to read the summaries?

  26. WindBourne will be along soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To tell us how we need even more spying on Americans.

  27. ADHD is NOT a "mental illness" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have ADHD too, and it's ridiculous to claim that it's a mental illness. Sure, it makes some things harder to do, and fitting in with what society expects of you isn't quite as easy, but it doesn't lead me to commit crimes! (Although I do have a slight tendency to hoard things, too) :P

  28. Ah, that all-too-common "highly" classified by gtvr · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see what the actual classification level was. It certainly wasn't "highly."

  29. Re:Being negligent (not careful) with it is a crim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sailor took a picture of the engine room on a nuclear vessel. AFAIK, the ship's interior is not necessarily classified, but the engine room definitely is.

  30. More lies from WindBourne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    The National Background Investigations Bureau (NBIB) is a semi-autonomous U.S. Government agency housed within the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that is responsible for conducting security clearance investigations into individuals who need to hold security clearances for employment purposes. Creation of the agency was announced in January 2016.[1] NBIB is the primary service provider of background investigations for the U.S. Government and conducts approximately 95 percent of government-wide background investigations for more than 100 federal agencies.[2] The agency's background investigation information technology (IT) systems will be designed, built, secured, and operated by the United States Department of Defense.[3]

    Why you always so clueless liar?