As noted in a previous article http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=102 624 This is not being done to educate; it is done to control.
There are two groups this shafts:
1) The ignorant "sharer" who does not understand security and gets penalized by the government after "warnings" are done away with by the penal system
2) The intentional sharer who believes in free Interent access for all.
Why this needs to be legislated? Who knows... Sad state of affairs when the government tells people who is allowed to come over for supper...
Slashdot Mirror
As noted in a previous article http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=102 624 This is not being done to educate; it is done to control.
There are two groups this shafts:
1) The ignorant "sharer" who does not understand security and gets penalized by the government after "warnings" are done away with by the penal system
2) The intentional sharer who believes in free Interent access for all.
Why this needs to be legislated? Who knows... Sad state of affairs when the government tells people who is allowed to come over for supper...