people will test for a long time before making anything really widespread and even then it will not be everyone Like bioengineered crops? Huge percentages of certain crops are now bioengineered. They haven't been adequately tested. Have NOT. Why can I say so, so definitively? Because when the whole butterfly thing came up, they had to go do some research before they could loudly and proudly declare that there was no problem. There is a problem, they did NOT KNOW the answer even though they had supposedly tested and tested the bioengineered crops for safety.
I have to agree with Utter regarding keyboard WIDTH. If you are having mousing problems there are a few things to look at: the way you click, where you wrist/base of your palm is resting, if your wrist is bent left or right, and lastly an easy to overlook issue, what your shoulder and upper arm are doing. Most keyboards force you to put your mouse WAAAYYYY over to the right, which is really bad. Or you must put your mouse on another plane, also bad. Very few people need the numeric keypad, which was added to the standard keyboard pre-mouse. It should long ago have been detached so that you can move it or remove it when you don't need it.
Frequency bands are reserved for transmission through the air. That doesn't mean that you can't use them in wire based transmission. Further, the FCC emissions regulations require that wire based transmission not interfere with air based transmission. It is entirely up to the wire based system to protect itself from interference caused by air based transmission. This is why you can't use a cell phone in a plane. The plane is protecting itself from interference from air based transmissions.
Actually, you just tickled my brain... Trademark law is pretty specific about how trademarks can be used, i.e. you can't say "The Xerox is broken", "Go make a Xerox", or even "Do you have a Kleenex?". It's supposed to be Kleenex (TM) tissue, Xerox (TM) copier, Kodak (tm) film or Kodak (tm) paper. And yet, http://www.kleenex.com goes to Kimberly-Clark's web page about all the various Kleenex (TM) brand products. Isnt' using kleenex as a domain name treading on think ice vis-a-vis proper use of trademarks under trademark law?
Slashdot Mirror
people will test for a long time before making anything really widespread and even then it will not be everyone
Like bioengineered crops?
Huge percentages of certain crops are now bioengineered. They haven't been adequately tested.
Have NOT.
Why can I say so, so definitively? Because when the whole butterfly thing came up, they had to go do some research before they could loudly and proudly declare that there was no problem. There is a problem, they did NOT KNOW the answer even though they had supposedly tested and tested the bioengineered crops for safety.
I have to agree with Utter regarding keyboard WIDTH. If you are having mousing problems there are a few things to look at: the way you click, where you wrist/base of your palm is resting, if your wrist is bent left or right, and lastly an easy to overlook issue, what your shoulder and upper arm are doing. Most keyboards force you to put your mouse WAAAYYYY over to the right, which is really bad. Or you must put your mouse on another plane, also bad. Very few people need the numeric keypad, which was added to the standard keyboard pre-mouse. It should long ago have been detached so that you can move it or remove it when you don't need it.
Frequency bands are reserved for transmission through the air. That doesn't mean that you can't use them in wire based transmission. Further, the FCC emissions regulations require that wire based transmission not interfere with air based transmission. It is entirely up to the wire based system to protect itself from interference caused by air based transmission. This is why you can't use a cell phone in a plane. The plane is protecting itself from interference from air based transmissions.
Actually, you just tickled my brain... Trademark law is pretty specific about how trademarks can be used, i.e. you can't say "The Xerox is broken", "Go make a Xerox", or even "Do you have a Kleenex?". It's supposed to be Kleenex (TM) tissue, Xerox (TM) copier, Kodak (tm) film or Kodak (tm) paper. And yet, http://www.kleenex.com goes to Kimberly-Clark's web page about all the various Kleenex (TM) brand products. Isnt' using kleenex as a domain name treading on think ice vis-a-vis proper use of trademarks under trademark law?