Now terrorists will find it a lot easier (and be sure about it!) where to "fly" their aircrafts. I think placing these pixels over sensitive targets is security-wise counterproductive or outright dangerous!!
The whole issue-raising is ridiculous. If the system gets intrinsic security mechanisms from day 1 everything will be ok as if the medical records had never left their home country.
We Europeans have to accept the fact we live in a big unified community and many patients want to get treated in the best available centers, regardless they are in their own country or a neighbor one. Is this bad? C'mon, be realistic. Only advantages will come from this scheme.
And I there is also money to save by the logistics advantages of a unified record system in the long term regarding patient mobility, clinical trials, organ transplants matching, etc.
I'm not quite sure this "no follow" evolution is so dramatic...
Afterall, what's really important are the INBOUND Wikipedia links. I really like to see Wikipedia results ranked first, especially for one-word queries. From there, one can follow the Wikipedia links.
In other words, it's fine for me if Google links to the combined authority-hub system Wikipedia has become. The rest is up to me.:)
Detection and treating methods can be patented. A malady and its underpinnings not. That said, patents indeed slow down low-cost access to pharmaceuticals.
What about a "learning" search engine (and directory)?
I prefer to spend 15-minutes-per-week to tune this engine by feeding it with words, sentences, documents, etc. and then leave heuristics do the rest. Most of the things I search are similar to my work, hobbies, and interests. Ranking the results is critical for not wasting time.
Of course, a great and intelligent algorithm is imperative. My faith is in Google. Again...
I've been reading a lot about India's growing role in the business of electronic scavenging and recycling. Seems that this Asian country with the enormous population and booming e-economy tries to find new uses from obsolete equipment.
Read here:
http://www.physorg.com/news67098899.html
Slashdot Mirror
Exactly.
Now terrorists will find it a lot easier (and be sure about it!) where to "fly" their aircrafts. I think placing these pixels over sensitive targets is security-wise counterproductive or outright dangerous!!
Hmm, I don't know if you have noticed, but the old expression in silico will now have to be dropped...
In ferro perhaps!
Seems they need to new find ways to spend their fortunes...
Why don't they start working on their own OS to go head-to-head with Microsoft? If there is one company that can do it, Google Inc. is!
The whole issue-raising is ridiculous. If the system gets intrinsic security mechanisms from day 1 everything will be ok as if the medical records had never left their home country.
We Europeans have to accept the fact we live in a big unified community and many patients want to get treated in the best available centers, regardless they are in their own country or a neighbor one. Is this bad? C'mon, be realistic. Only advantages will come from this scheme.
And I there is also money to save by the logistics advantages of a unified record system in the long term regarding patient mobility, clinical trials, organ transplants matching, etc.
Probably it died after seeing the "ugly humans" studying it... hehe, jee, creepy shark!
Haha, how true!
I'm not quite sure this "no follow" evolution is so dramatic...
:)
Afterall, what's really important are the INBOUND Wikipedia links. I really like to see Wikipedia results ranked first, especially for one-word queries. From there, one can follow the Wikipedia links.
In other words, it's fine for me if Google links to the combined authority-hub system Wikipedia has become. The rest is up to me.
Detection and treating methods can be patented. A malady and its underpinnings not. That said, patents indeed slow down low-cost access to pharmaceuticals.
Just don't appear in a courthouse saying you read this article in the Economist and it wasn't you who broke the law but "your faulty brain"...
I smell dead people. Walking around like regural people... :p
What about a "learning" search engine (and directory)? I prefer to spend 15-minutes-per-week to tune this engine by feeding it with words, sentences, documents, etc. and then leave heuristics do the rest. Most of the things I search are similar to my work, hobbies, and interests. Ranking the results is critical for not wasting time. Of course, a great and intelligent algorithm is imperative. My faith is in Google. Again...
I've been reading a lot about India's growing role in the business of electronic scavenging and recycling. Seems that this Asian country with the enormous population and booming e-economy tries to find new uses from obsolete equipment. Read here: http://www.physorg.com/news67098899.html