thats not the point mister..my main point is,the reason why we should put a warning sign is to notify user which site that were blocked..what if some of the sites are legitimate???and by using the IE, tadaaa..u've missed..the site had been blocked!?have u been thinkin' about it??i've experience things like that,and it does made me feel frustrated..yeah sure...what kinda jackass would visit that website once he knows that he's been spoof of?hell,we've just to make sure that end-user would want to know what the browser is blocking..
(make sure i didn't see ur face in class man..!!)
well..if they were meant to BLOCK the known webpages..its better for them to WARN instead..IE should let people know which website to be filtered..then,after that those websites will be block forever..Dont u agree wit me??( a good HCI is where the program lets the user feel in control..:) )
I'd say blocking phishing web pages are great...but if MPF is ONLY able to detect the KNOW phish..i'd say thats just a waste of time..another great HYPE from microsoft...hey bill,let go phishing!!!
well done bill...IE is now full load of patches..i'd say..if a ship were to have some holes and were patched,it still would not sink and thus those hole would remain be patched......but for an IE(or any particular microsoft softwarw), no matter how much u'd patch it up..new holes would then reappear...as if it was ENDLESS!!..come on Bill...u suck us dry with ur Windows..now do something quickly or else shit might happens again...
how can they rely 100% on computer's data analysis..while they do know that the computer may produce bad output data as well as some false alarm(imperfections in the Soviet military system )..thank god petrov do know when to follow his on intuition..which may be impossible to be implemented to any known system and any computer intelligence..if this things goes on....i WOULD see world war III for another 3 years..or maybe tomorrow..who knows!??its best that a system that is guarding such important task be tested a lot of times to make sure it is FOOLPROOF and BUGFREE...by the way..i hope microsoft isn't the one who created those system for the Nuclear Monitoring SYstem..or else..they'd be doomsday for the next day..and it would be TOO late for Bill Gates to find a 'patch' for it!!..:D
last words...best of wishes to Stanislav Petrov...May God Bless You...u were the world's hero....and still are THE HERO!!
Slashdot Mirror
thats not the point mister..my main point is,the reason why we should put a warning sign is to notify user which site that were blocked..what if some of the sites are legitimate???and by using the IE, tadaaa..u've missed..the site had been blocked!?have u been thinkin' about it??i've experience things like that,and it does made me feel frustrated..yeah sure...what kinda jackass would visit that website once he knows that he's been spoof of?hell,we've just to make sure that end-user would want to know what the browser is blocking.. (make sure i didn't see ur face in class man..!!)
hurm....do these online merchants use PayPal instead??or do they never heard of such names..:p
well..if they were meant to BLOCK the known webpages..its better for them to WARN instead..IE should let people know which website to be filtered..then,after that those websites will be block forever..Dont u agree wit me??( a good HCI is where the program lets the user feel in control..:) )
I'd say blocking phishing web pages are great...but if MPF is ONLY able to detect the KNOW phish..i'd say thats just a waste of time..another great HYPE from microsoft...hey bill,let go phishing!!!
well done bill...IE is now full load of patches..i'd say..if a ship were to have some holes and were patched,it still would not sink and thus those hole would remain be patched......but for an IE(or any particular microsoft softwarw), no matter how much u'd patch it up..new holes would then reappear...as if it was ENDLESS!!..come on Bill...u suck us dry with ur Windows..now do something quickly or else shit might happens again...
LOL!!
how can they rely 100% on computer's data analysis..while they do know that the computer may produce bad output data as well as some false alarm(imperfections in the Soviet military system )..thank god petrov do know when to follow his on intuition..which may be impossible to be implemented to any known system and any computer intelligence..if this things goes on....i WOULD see world war III for another 3 years..or maybe tomorrow..who knows!??its best that a system that is guarding such important task be tested a lot of times to make sure it is FOOLPROOF and BUGFREE...by the way..i hope microsoft isn't the one who created those system for the Nuclear Monitoring SYstem..or else..they'd be doomsday for the next day..and it would be TOO late for Bill Gates to find a 'patch' for it!!..:D last words...best of wishes to Stanislav Petrov...May God Bless You...u were the world's hero....and still are THE HERO!!