I find this to be an interesting Freudian slip on your part, and very telling. Neither billy_bob (whose post I had replied to) nor I ever used the word "idiot". He referred to the Christian right, I agreed and added that these people's minds are already made up and no one can tell them anything different, and you seem to have made a connection between the aforementioned Christian right and the offensive title of "idiot".
Moving on to the "Pot Calling the Kettle Black" department, I'd very much like to hear how having the opinion that "stem cell research has serious medical potential to make life worth living for millions of people while it is not in any way, shape or form a matter of ethics", can in any way be called "blind agreement" whereas being a member of the Christian right and repeating the mantra that "stem cells are people too" somehow does not qualify as "blind agreement". It's a rather poor attempt at Swiftboating the discussion.
Amen! (sorry). I expected more from posters to this site - my bad. This is blatant election-time propaganda. Fortunately, the only ones likely to fall for it are already of "that persuasion", if you know what I mean.
Slashdot Mirror
Warmonger.
Done. Consider yourself flipped.
You seem confused. I'd like to help but you'll need to be a bit more specific.
I find this to be an interesting Freudian slip on your part, and very telling. Neither billy_bob (whose post I had replied to) nor I ever used the word "idiot". He referred to the Christian right, I agreed and added that these people's minds are already made up and no one can tell them anything different, and you seem to have made a connection between the aforementioned Christian right and the offensive title of "idiot".
Moving on to the "Pot Calling the Kettle Black" department, I'd very much like to hear how having the opinion that "stem cell research has serious medical potential to make life worth living for millions of people while it is not in any way, shape or form a matter of ethics", can in any way be called "blind agreement" whereas being a member of the Christian right and repeating the mantra that "stem cells are people too" somehow does not qualify as "blind agreement". It's a rather poor attempt at Swiftboating the discussion.
Amen! (sorry). I expected more from posters to this site - my bad. This is blatant election-time propaganda. Fortunately, the only ones likely to fall for it are already of "that persuasion", if you know what I mean.